Daphne Lantier

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page. This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Daphne_Lantier. This is the user talk page of Daphne Lantier, where you can send messages and comments to Daphne Lantier. Be polite. Be friendly. Assume good faith. No personal attacks. Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end. Put new text under old text. New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible. Click here to start a new topic. Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Deletion of Diane Lemieux photo Hi, you have deleted the picture of Diane Lemieux French and English wikipedia page. What is the procedure to get a photo up on the bio... This picture is authorized and official. I can have Diane Lemieux's personnal approval note if needed! It's the first time I work on editing wiki pages... i'm unaware of the procedure... Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandralev (talk • contribs) 19:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC) This was deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diane Lemieux Commission de la construction du Québec.jpg. The image in question was uploaded by you, and claimed as "own work" and also by User:Julie Gascon in April. Julie Gascon attributed the photo to Commission de la construction du Québec. To host the image on Commons, we would require OTRS permission from the copyright holder of the image. Diane Lemieux is the subject of the image, so I don't think she would be the copyright holder. That would be either Commission de la construction du Québec or the photographer. Daphne Lantier 22:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Request As you have just deleted File:Alberto Garzón.jpg, could you (speedily) delete the following derivative works? Regards File:Alberto Garzón (cropped).jpg File:Alberto Garzón (crop).jpg File:Alberto Garzón b (cropped).jpg File:Alberto Garzón (2011).jpg ‎Regards. --Asqueladd (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Daphne Lantier 22:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Deleted image I complained to User:Wdwd when he closed this nomination Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamat-Gader, 1976 - Job de Graaf.jpg less than 24 hours after being nominated. So, as the uploader has indicated he is trying to get an OTRS verification, I am surprised to see you closed what I consider would be a Less clear cases should remain open for at least seven days after just two and a half days. It is not for me to tell you the job but most admins seem to be a bit more measured in such cases. But thanks for all the work you do. Ww2censor (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC) @Ww2censor: I closed this because it was failed today at license review ({{Unfree Flickr file|1=Elisfkc|2=ND}}). We don't usually leave the file up if it's ND on Flickr. What's the big difference between waiting for OTRS with the file deleted or still live? Myself or any other admin can restore it easily if and when OTRS is received and processed. I don't appreciate your insulting passive aggressive comment about telling me my job and other admins being more measured. Keep those unpleasant comments to yourself if you post any further messages on my talk. Thanks. Daphne Lantier 22:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC) I am well aware a deleted file can be restored by you or any other admin but I believe closing quite so quickly tends to frustrate those less experienced uploaders who might appreciate a few days to try and solve their problem especially when OTRS is so backlogged these days. I think you are overreacting to a pretty simple question about a deletion closure. If you consider my comments insulting, passive aggressive or unpleasant I think you are taking my question far too seriously but I aplogise; in fact I acknowledged the hard work you do and I specifically did not tell you your job but asked if this was not a case for a slower close based on my experience here dealing with copyright issues. I could use far less tact but that's not my style. So let me ask you a question, if the file had an {{OTRS pending}} template, would you still have closed the nomination so quickly? Ww2censor (talk) 23:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC) If the file had an OTRS pending tag, do you think Elisfkc would've failed the license review? Maybe you should tell him to be a bit more measured? Now, unless you've actually got something to say, aside from phoney self-justification, please stop wasting my time. Daphne Lantier 00:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulus Ebner (talk • contribs) 09:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC) North Korean images Hi Daphne, I notice you made mistakes with your closures of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laika ac Yanggakdo Hotel Lobby (6894948461).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laika ac Yanggakdo Hotel (7984286520).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Getting a North Korean suit made in Pyongyang (10295124953).jpg. The deletion rationale was invalid, the content is in scope, and one file was in active use on two different projects when you deleted them. These images should have been kept, so I've re-closed these images as being Kept. There may be some value in discussing our approach to images which could be regarded as North Korea propaganda in future, however. Nick (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC) File:1893 Hermann Blodig.jpg Hello Daphne, you deleted File:1893 Hermann Blodig.jpg because of a copyright violation. The paintings in Category:Wenzel Ottokar Noltsch are all from the same painter (who passed away in 1908) and source, therefore maybe all these files have to be deleted as well. I thought that these images are public domain, because the painter died more than 70 years ago. In addition, some of the images from Category:Faculty of TU Wien are from the same source, but from other painters (they also passed away more than 70 years ago), like File:1927 Max von Ferstel.jpg, File:1928 Johann Oser.jpg, File:Oskar Primavesi 1936.jpg and File:1909 Eduard Dolezal.jpg. Thanks a lot! --M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC) No, this was a mistake on my part and that of the person who tagged it for deletion. PD-Art applies here, so I've reversed my action and undeleted the file. My apologies for the trouble. Daphne Lantier 16:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Dear Daphne, your first action was definitely right! The photograph of the portrait of Hermann Blodig was taken in 2015 by Thomas Györik, member of the Archives of TU Wien. The portrait, which is in custody of our archives, was photographed for the publication that was the source of the scan. This fact is stated in the photo credits in the book on p.155. I asked our legal department and they are sure that this case is a clear violations of (Austrian) copyright: - The name of the photographers are not mentioned (Thomas Györik, Erich Jiresch - as stated in the photo credits on p. 155) - No one ever asked the photographers and/or the owner of the copyright (TU Wien/Archives of TU Wien)for usage on wikipedia. Please delete the photo of Hermann Blodig and all of the scans of https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Rektoren_der_Technischen_Universit%C3%A4t_Wien that were taken of "Eine Sammlung von außerordentlicher Geschlossenheit, ISBN 978-3-205-20113-7 (Festschrift 200 Jahre TU Wien, Band 13)". Best regards&thanks in advance Paulus Ebner, Head of the Archives of TU Wien