Commons:Deletion requests/2024/11/01

Revision as of 07:23, 6 November 2024 by Rosenzweig (talk | contribs) (already in another day's list)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

November 1

edit

Files uploaded by Azraumrn (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused text images, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   01:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work claim - small size, looks to have compression artifacts, no metadata. License makes no sense. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per nom. Beyond the dubious own work claim and low quality, if it is AI-generated as the licensing claims, then I'd say it's also of limited educational value and out of scope. The train is of the Pere Marquette Railway 1225, for which we also have sufficient quality photos of (see Category:Pere Marquette Railway 1225). ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 09:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The owner of the image does not want this picture of his to be on the internet, as it is an old photo that he did not intend to upload. He doesn’t know how to delete it and has just learned that he can request its removal, so he is sending this message. WONDERBEARdee (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how you can request deletion on behalf of the photographer, but are you saying the uploader was not the photographer, and if so, how do you know? This photo is probably out of COM:SCOPE, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Postage stamps of Romania are PD. There's zero evidence that photographs on postcards become PD simply because they contain a stamp though. That's not how the law usually works. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Taiwan modern postage stamps of Taiwan are copyrighted. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO. deleted Adamant1 (talk) 02:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


duplicate of File:3rd Proposal.svg Feitidede (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not own work, could exist under free licence due to being a government work. Also uploading File:KAPII Tarawa.jpg for same reason Traumnovelle (talk) 03:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted YouTube screenshot, not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel Didn't know this was an issue. My apologies. MaskedSinger (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:Flickr washing for more information. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted YouTube screenshot, not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely to be own work, small size, without useful metadata, user has multiple warnings/violation on his uploads NinjaStrikers «» 04:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work since I have a relative who knows Soe Thu personally, If you used reverse Google search like you always use, you can't find it anywhere. KhantWiki (talk) 09:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you aren't the photographer of this photo, you do not have the rights. NinjaStrikers «» 11:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It really doesn't matter even if I'm not the photographer, my relatives know the individual and have met him in real life, I, myself have met him in 2017/2016. There's tons of photographs of him with my relatives, and since it's my relatives they allow me the use of it. It is my own work. Again you can't find the photograph even using it by Google search. So, I have the rights. KhantWiki (talk) 11:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are not the photographer and thus you do not have the rights of the photo. And you can't release it like you own it without proper permission statement from the copyright owner/photographer. NinjaStrikers «» 12:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I own the work and I have the rights except to being the photographer, I don't think being a photographer means having the rights. If I created the work myself, I own the rights. You can't find the photograph anywhere, it's not a good idea to say who's the photographer without its credible visibility and popularity. I have proper permission from the photographer with whom I know and is a close relative of mine. In that case the photographer is my relative and I own the work since I uploaded it to Commons. KhantWiki (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, I get that you do not really understand Commons' licensing terms. NinjaStrikers «» 12:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is not the work of VOA as VOA reused the content of "Ko Paing Photography/Win Neinmitayon Monastery" per the watermarks at the upper right and left corners on the source video. needs clear permissions NinjaStrikers «» 04:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Norway A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


ライセンス表示が間違っていた 奥村大紀 (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hninsiphyutoxica (talk · contribs)

edit

Professional indoor shots with watermarks. need permission.

NinjaStrikers «» 03:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hninsiphyutoxica (talk · contribs)

edit

unlikely to be own works, small size, no useful metadata

NinjaStrikers «» 04:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Those are expressly not sufficient reasons for deletion, per COM:DR. However, since these are pictures of a Miss Universe Myanmar, that makes it much more doubtful they are really the uploader's own works, and I think that is a sufficient reason for deletion, with their sizes and lack of useful metadata functioning as supporting evidence, exactly as intended in COM:DR, which you might want to have a look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry and unused image, we have lots of options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This is a photo of the entire building and the area around it. The mural is unavoidably included and is entirely incidental to the overall subject-matter of the photograph (which is the entire building and surroundings). The mural was not the reason for taking the photograph.
The COM:De minimis#Guidelines say a file containing copyrighted work X is less likely to satisfy de minimis the more of these it meets:
the file is in use to illustrate X
the file is categorised in relation to X
X is referenced in the filename
X is referenced in the description
X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless
from other contextual clues (e.g., by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader) X is the reason for the creation of the file.

The only one of these that this photo failed is "X is referenced in the description" to remedy that I have updated the description. I think this file can be safely kept.

Lorax (talk) 02:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: unused printout of a deleted enwiki draft. Omphalographer (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Ninjastrikers as Speedy (Nonderivative) - Contradicts VOA license template. Which is correct? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This screenshot is from a VOA video which shot at the funeral of the monk. The video includes a picture of the monk and this screenshot comes from it. COM:DM? NinjaStrikers «» 06:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
VOA allows their videos or photos to be used and marked under the public domain if you credit them respectfully. KhantWiki (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
VOA re-shoot the photo of the monk. That photo is not their work and they can't release it under PD. NinjaStrikers «» 10:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Upon your claims, I visited the source in my description and found that there's a VOA watermark, credits which it claims, right beside the photo, doesn't that mean they created it and they can allow it to be released under public domain? As far as you dive deeper into the source and see what's actually there, Voice of America (Burmese) credit to themselves only and not others. If they don't create the work they won't have to put the watermark there or they would put a credit to who created the work. KhantWiki (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At 0:37 of video, there was the picture of the monk which is not the work of VOA. Even VOA created the whole video, that picture is the work of someone and probably copyrighted. NinjaStrikers «» 11:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have previewed the source again, that 37 seconds of the video you're talking about is the term "အရှင် ပညာစာရ ကြခတ်ဝိုင်း" (Ashin Pannasara Kyauk Taw Win) actually refers to a religious title and location associated with a Buddhist monk, not to any statement about VOA ownership or copyright status. It could also means that the photographer of the photo, granted access for permission of usage to Voice of America (Burmese) to use it on the video, which they owns now. KhantWiki (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ပြောတာ သဘောမပေါက်ဘူးထင်တယ်။ ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ဘုန်းကြီး ဓာတ်ပုံကို ဗီအိုအေ က ရိုက်ထားတယ်။ မူရင်း ဘုန်းကြီး ဓာတ်ပုံမှာ မူပိုင်ခွင့် အခြေအနေမသိရဘူး။ ဗီအိုအေက ပြန်ရိုက်တဲ့ ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ပါနေတာနဲ့ အဲဒီဓာတ်ပုံကို သူတို့ မပိုင်သွားဘူး။ အဲဒါကို derivative work လို့ခေါ်တယ်။ ဓာတ်ပုံကို ဓာတ်ပုံ/ဗီဒီယိုပြန်ရိုက်လိုက်တာနဲ့ ပြန်ရိုက်လိုက်တဲ့သူက မူရင်းဓာတ်ပုံရဲ့ မူပိုင်ခွင့် အခွင့်အရေးကို ပိုင်မသွားဘူး။ မူလဓာတ်ပုံဆရာမှာပဲ မူပိုင်ခွင့် ရှိနေတယ်။ ခုတင်ထားတဲ့ ပုံသည်လည်း ဗီဒီယိုထဲမှာ ပါနေတဲ့၊ VOA က မပိုင်တဲ့ ဓာတ်ပုံတစ်ပုံဖြစ်နေလို့ ပြောနေတာ။ NinjaStrikers «» 12:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
သဘော‌ပေါက်ပါတယ် ဒါပေးမဲ့ အဲ့ဒီ ရိုက်ထားတဲ့ပုံရဲ photographer က VOA Burmese ကို permission အပြည့်ပေးထားလို VOA က photographer ရဲ credit ကိုမထည့်တာ။ photographer က သူ့တို့ရဲပုံကိုပေးသုံးရင် VOA မှာသုံးခွင့် permission ရရင် public domain ထဲ့ရောက်ပါတယ်။ (I understand what you're trying to say, but, the photographer who captured the photo could have given permission to VOA Burmese, that's why they didn't put the credit of the photographer next to the photo. If they have given the permission, VOA Burmese can upload the picture under the PD.) KhantWiki (talk) 12:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This document was added to Common in accordance with Wikiversity's procedure : https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cognitive_science Rbmn (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Posting your essay as a "see also" link to a PDF document on a stub resource is not an established procedure on Wikiversity (or any project that I'm aware of). Omphalographer (talk) 16:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

غلاف كتاب له حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 06:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

أنا أعد مقالة عن الكاتب نفسه وأعطاني كامل الحق لنشر هذا الغلاف وجميع أغلفة كتبه الأخرى تحت قانون المشاع بويكيبيديا، وبالتالي فلا أرى داعيا لحذف الصورة من هذه الناحية، ولكم واسع النظر FLABISO (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FLABISO:

العربية: اقترح على حضرتك تبعت اثبات الاذن لفريق COM:VRT
English: i suggest sending the premssion proof to COM:VRT team

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.54.17.205 (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kani (talk · contribs)

edit

{{NoFoP-Finland}}

TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 06:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical image, person depicted in the image died in 1933, unlikely to be own work. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 06:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Book cover. There's no proof if author, publisher or copyright holder explicitly allows it (e.g., through a Creative Commons license or public domain dedication). –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 07:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced this auto-traced raster file with a PNG version. Kj1595 (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo and the other photos by this uploader might be own work. The photos have EXIF data and the uploader is likely acquainted or associated with the subject (or is the depicted subject) judging by the uploader's username (RAPiS DX). There is a section called "株式会社RAPiS" on the subject's Ja Wiki article[1] which also mentions the letters "DX", so the uploader's username is in that article and it looks like RAPiS is the name of the subject's company[2]. A similar, but different, photo is also used as the profile picture of the subject's Instagram[3]. So, possibly a work for hire for advertisement purposes, or upload by a company representative, or upload by the subject of the photo. Either way, the images might be out of scope as advertising in nature, and the company potentially lacking encyclopedic notability (the article on the subject has been nominated for deletion on Ja Wiki[4]). Nakonana (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 1.33.123.150 as no source (No source since) Krd 07:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Info Uploader has been blocked indefinitely from jawiki for longterm vandalism (and sock puppetry?). Nakonana (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:FOP Taiwan メイド理世 (talk) 07:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not a free image. Taken from Instagram. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 08:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. Taken from Instagram. LuCKY 💬 ✒️ 📂 08:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

Ukrainian copyright law does not contain a general exception for reproductions of works in public places. Museum exposition with author's works. File is a derivative work and sources or permission of the original works are not given. Uploader did not create this paitings. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Так а чиї це роботи?--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Не знаю. Але не знаю ніякої художниці Регіни Костюк. І дядько Гугль теж не знає. І дядько Фейсбук не знає. У племінника ТікТока я не питав. Отже, точно не авторки світлини. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Знайшов — авторка полотен художниця Тетяна Балбус! Відкриття персональної виставки у музеї Юліуша Словацького відбулося 19 вересня 2024 року. Дозволу від Тетяни Балбус нема, тож це порушення авторських прав. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

all the information here are fake: not the English channel, but the Mediterrenean Sea, not own work, not 2024 - meta information refers to Reuters, watermark to Italian Navy, license bogus - image published besides many others 2016 here: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/fluechtlingskrise/mittelmeer-frontex-rechnet-mit-300-000-fluechtlingen-aus-libyen-14294497.html Albinfo (talk) 08:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file has previously been deleted under File:Islamic flag as shown in the Cantino Planisphere (1512).png due to being a misrepresentation. The map does not depict the flag of the Malaccan Sultanate but instead uses this very same design to represent multiple Muslim kingdoms, including the Ottoman Empire which obviously did not have a black crescent on their flag. EmpAhmadK (talk) 08:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Leoblade56 (talk · contribs)

edit

These three images are all snatched from the paper:
White, William T. (March 28, 2024). "Dichichthyidae, a New Family of Deepwater Sharks (Carcharhiniformes) from the Indo–West Pacific, with Description of a New Species". Fishes 9 (4): 121. MDPI AG. DOI:10.3390/fishes9040121. ISSN 2410-3888.

Asked on their user talk page on English Wikipedia, uploader has not responded.

Sam Sailor 09:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A map from a fantasy game. VRT permission from game publisher needed. MKFI (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the Tikhon of Zadonsk statue built in 2005 according to the plan of sculptor Ivan Dikunov (1941–2022) on the territory of the Monastery of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary (Zadonsk) (see [5]). The file would need to be renamed when undeleted (in 2093?) as it is not located in the city of Yelets and not even in the Yelets eparchy, but in Zadonsk, in the Lipetsk eparchy. I've marked the file for bot transfer to Ru Wikivoyage. Please give the bot some time to do the transfer before deleting the file. There will be a note by the bot in the file history once after the transfer is done. Nakonana (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected COM:NETCOPYVIO: previously published in https://www.dm.unibo.it/~ruggeri/CV_Tommaso_Ruggeri_n.pdf. MKFI (talk) 09:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by VeritasVanguard as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This image depicts identifiable children who may not have provided consent for their likeness to be shared publicly. Since minors cannot legally consent in India, and due to potential privacy risks, this image may require review or removal under privacy guidelines.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. As this shot was taken 6 years ago, the depicted children will look quite different now. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have no evidence that these children have knowledge where the picture/image was going to be used. It is still a privacy concern. VeritasVanguard (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Keep Great portrait. Yann (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Keep Good quality image and cultural record. Personality rights warning exists for just such concerns and covers it. FotoFree (talk) 09:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FotoFree This image should not be generalized as 'Children of Punjab', as India is a diverse nation where people look different if you change cities. Please read on the topic before making a comment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_India VeritasVanguard (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't seem like a generalization to me. These are simply some children of Punjab. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Derivative work: photograph-of-photograph. Original source and author unknown. MKFI (talk) 09:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI created video. Taken from web with unknown author. Normally this would be COM:NETCOPYVIO but I am not certain if AI created videos are copyrighted. MKFI (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was an AI-generated video produced by the Russians for election interference in the U.S.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-false-claims-russian-disinformation-groups/
The Russians laundered the AI video through Twitter user Alphafox78.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html Greatbrookcondor (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright violation: previously published in https://www.allrail.eu/mediaposts/continuing-to-help-the-railway-workers-of-ukraine-and-their-families/ MKFI (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by VeritasVanguard as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 This may be useful, but it is a picture of a picture. We need the permission from the original author. Yann (talk) 09:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the picture is the picture of a picture, it is still F10. Person(s) in this image is non notable. and do not justify 'Wedding in Punjab' Title. VeritasVanguard (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please also see Commons:NOTHOST & Commons:NOTSOCIAL. VeritasVanguard (talk) 10:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This might be a good candidate for Category:Men of Punjab, India, but I actually wonder if it is not a digital picture modified to look old. Please see other uploads by this user. Yann (talk) 10:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it looks like a print under a transparent sheet in a photo album, like other images in the same series. It doesn't look especially modified or made to look old. No real opinion on the request, but the sum of several potential issues could justify deletion. 1. It would be useful to have a confirmation by the uploader that they are really the author of all the original photos. 2. And real dates of the original photos. 3. There are privacy concerns about those photos of non notable persons in a private setting. 4. Not sure that all those dozens of photos can be in scope for Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having just look at all 5 photos linked in this DR and another one lower down this page, I agree that they are F10. Photos of a wedding itself can be useful, but these are strictly personal and not really high-quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we have concluded that the photos are F10. And should be deleted. VeritasVanguard (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Amnears (talk · contribs)

edit

Not own works. Some may be in the public domain, but more information is needed.

Yann (talk) 10:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For instance File:1942-04-12; Premier match de l'histoire du WAC au handball.jpg comes from this newspaper LeFnake (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License NC only. Yann (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright for this stamp of 2018. See Commons:Stamps#Italy. Wouter (talk) 10:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo with no educational value Renvoy (talk) 10:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image shows an erroneous distribution of Zoraida sinuosa in Mozambique and South Africa. A corrected image has been uploaded. I am the author of the original and the corrected images. The corrected image is File:Zoraida distribution2.jpg. Bernhard Zelazny (talk) 10:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gill Prabhnoor (talk · contribs)

edit

Pictures of pictures. Who is the original photographer?

Yann (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Holy-DYVR (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:PACKAGING with prominent artwork.

Belbury (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Holy-DYVR (talk · contribs)

edit

More COM:PACKAGING with artwork and/or complex logos.

Belbury (talk) 10:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The artwork, which represents Opoku Ware II, is probably not in the public domain and there is no FOP in Ghana. — Racconish💬 11:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Derivative work using copyrighted character image. Nv8200p (talk) 11:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright violation: claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author andrii pasichnyk Copyright holder andrii pasichnyk". VRT permission from Andrii Pasichnyk needed. MKFI (talk) 11:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

suspected per COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. This photo was originally posted and owned by Natpakorn Hansri, a Thai makeup artist, not by the uploader. The photo via his instagram post: https://www.instagram.com/p/DBb4XZAyMX1/ Ddjingjing (talk) 11:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the picture. and credit has been given to the owner of the image. Why is it still offered as a photo deletion? Kromla (talk) 07:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I found out that the image was used by regular news agencies. and published to the public Why is there such an effort to put out good images? and replace it with an image that makes the winner look ugly. Kromla (talk) 07:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File seems to be problematic or damaged in its form. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 11:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is totally blurry Dagmawi-M (talk) 11:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep The picture is from a moving train, so it is normal (movement stripes at the edges). The middle (remote view) is not blurry. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
for me it is a usefull view from a railway bridge in the valley.
BUT: I guess the 7. (!!!) sock-troll-account (with only few edits, but fast deletion requests) to one of my files. I no longer believe in coincidences after 6 (!!!) incidents in this matter:
Users created:
8. Juni 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mikael1973
only 4 edits, 1 deletion request to one of my files; BLOCKED by User:Yann; 100% sock
3. Juli 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dagmawi-M  ???????????? (similar time of account creation, only few edits like the others; same text „Because it is totally blurry“ like some other account with few edits and deletion request to one of my files.
Only 267 edits; 1 deletion request to one of my files; „Because it is totally blurry“
2. Juni 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Neau
only 7 edits, 1 deletion request to one of my files; not blocked yet; same text „Because it is totally blurry“; --> same sock text
28. Mai 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vanished_user_27334ce4baf553c335b31aef09591e9a = HuseynAZE99
only 127 edits, 1 deletion request to one of my files; BLOCKED; same text „Because it is totally blurry“; --> same sock text
1. Mai 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pilotico72
only 12 edits, 1 deletion request to one of my files; BLOCKED by User:Yann
3. April 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kbsdg
only 503 edits, 1 deletion request to one of my files; BLOCKED by User:Turelio, Vandalism: apparent sock
18. März 2023
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cyberlorg
zero edits; send me a thanks for a file nominated; 100% sock
@Yann: can you check this socks out? Greets -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 21:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouf of scope (?) material. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by David Chirwa (talk · contribs)

edit

Spam. The uploader was blocked on enwiki due to undisclosed paid editing.

SCP-2000 12:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Converted it into svg years ago from an existing file, not own work, a new signature (in svg format) is avaliable from other upload (not by me). Want it deleted for copyright reasons - at the time did not know. A better version of the signature exists in the said other file and there is no reason for this one.

Best regards, Wikisempra Wikisempra (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikisempra: I am failing to understand under what policy-based rationale you are proposing that this file be deleted. In particular, signatures are not generally protected by copyright. Xover (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not my own work. Wikisempra (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a personal image and I do not want this image to be available publically anymore. Ex6tenz98 (talk) 13:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a personal image and I do not want this image to be available publically anymore. Please consider deleting this photo. Ex6tenz98 (talk) 13:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a personal image and I do not want this image to be available publically anymore. Please consider deleting this photo. Ex6tenz98 (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are so many small penis pictures in Commons, upload a photo of your big ass better. 186.175.232.124 14:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

defect file, easy to replace with original flags, not in use Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Useless and lousy collage. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative 186.175.12.183 13:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not like own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eeamarante (talk · contribs)

edit

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   14:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outside project scope, "FIFA Ballon d'Or 2017" does not exist because the FIFA/Ballon d'Or partnership ended in 2015. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ntulande (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused low quality promotional materials, which are unlikely own work, out of project scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 14:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence provided, nor precedent established, that Associated Press or Cole County, Missouri released this image under any Creative Commons license. Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old picture of mine used to test Wikipedia in sandbox feature, but now shows up when searching my name on Google Smibrick (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe das Bild 2020 hochgeladen. Keine Seiten verwenden die Datei. Bei einer Google-Suche unter dem Namen Anneli-Sofia Räcker erscheint ein Hinweis auf den File unter der Überschrift Wikipedia, was suggerieren könnte, das ein entsprechender Eintrag folgt, was jedoch nicht der Fall ist. Deshalb beantragt die abgebildete Person, Frau Räcker, die Löschung des Files in Wikimedia commons. Danke für ihre Mühe. Charlydia52 (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (variant).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This old Virgin Media logo appears to be above the threshold of originality in the UK. Xeroctic (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dr. Grampinator (talk · contribs)

edit

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unwatermarked and unapproved for public publishing nudity 158.222.69.218 16:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Speedy keep nonsense request, incomprehensible. Dronebogus (talk) 13:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is unwatermarked and unapproved for public publishing nudity. This deletion request is not nonsense nor incomprehensible. One should expect professional photographers to claim their work and not hide behind anonymity in order to "publish" nude photos. 158.222.69.218 15:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know who this profesional photographer is? 200.39.139.10 15:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"This photo is unwatermarked and unapproved for public publishing nudity" is incomprehensible. (1) We don't want watermarks. (2) Unapproved by whom? And I don't understand the rest of your remarks. What Commons policy can you cite that requires deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Keep no valid rationale for deletion. Nudity is allowed in Commons and his or her expectations are not reflected in Commons' policies. Günther Frager (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped my picture YounessFakoiallah (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason. But by all means, argue on the file's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In user RecycledPixels opinion, PP-US of this image seems suspicious Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely copyvio. File was uploaded to Commons from Flickr in 2014. The linked Flickr page shows that the image was uploaded to that site in 2010 with an All Rights Reserved copyright tag, and no other history of licensing tags used. Neither the Flickr page nor this page provides a justification of when or where this image was ever published without a proper copyright notice. My attempts to verify the copyright status of this image have failed, and the original uploader, who was a prolific image uploader, has been banned from Commons. RecycledPixels (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alamy also has it PD, though I don't know where they got it. It says UtCon Collection / Alamy Stock Photo. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the picture has no metadata, I believe it is pulled straight from the club’s website and is subject to copyright. Link here SunnyTango (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: no realistic educational value. Plenty of better quality pictures of "Women" on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


In the words of the uploader an "artsy" variant of Frans Timmermans' signature, I don't see how this falls within the scope of this project. Pennenetui3000 (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was originally uploaded to be "critical" on the Dutch article on Timmermans, accusing the Dutch editors of being "very politically biased" for not keeping it in the infobox. (link) Pennenetui3000 (talk) 16:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Delete. I don't know about "artsy"; this seems more like it was intended to be demeaning to the subject. Omphalographer (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks by Cordula Paul (who doesn't seem to be the uploader); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wrong street, non standard, numeration missing; unclear GioviPen GP msg 17:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank with no content. Doesnt match the description Rathfelder (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep As is obvious from the source page, this is the reverse of the work; the obverse is shown under "other versions". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

license washing Mateus2019 (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely a personal file. Out of project scope: COM:HOST. Ratekreel (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JorgeVBis (talk · contribs)

edit

Likely Flickrwashing. Photos from a recently opened Flickr account and uploaded to Commons the same day as they were uploaded to Flickr. Notice that the user a month before these uploads was also blocked for Flickrwashing [6].

Günther Frager (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aziztablo (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused very low quality images, unlikely own work

~TheImaCow (talk) 17:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality promotional materials, out of scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 18:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by СТАРМАС1 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused low quality images apparently uploaded for promotion, out of project scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

because thats me i didn't upload it at all it and i know that from the user name (desing_dr) so pls remove it Egeorgegr (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not a bad photo. But it is tagged as "Television" at the source, and thus most likely a screen grab. 109.71.220.186 18:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably he is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by P199 as Dw no source since (dw no source since)

No FoP in France. Mosaic looks more recent than the 1950s. Abzeronow (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there is no information about the credit near the site, the Mosaic is a communal creation. It's a deception about this delete decision. Sidoinec (talk) 23:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Le mur de Moretti. Conçue initialement pour les Halles de Paris, l’œuvre de l’artiste Raymond Moretti retrace l’histoire du monde, l’apparition de l’homme et du langage. Cette immense fresque fut peinte à l’huile sur du béton en seulement 90 jours. Un exploit !
Extrait : Tautavel Découvrez la cité préhistorique et ses activités en huit bons plans, 2013
https://www.lindependant.fr/2013/06/05/tautavel-decouvrez-la-cite-prehistorique-et-ses-activites-en-huit-bons-plans,1768782.php Sidoinec (talk) 23:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information. Raymond Moretti died in 2005, so this can be restored in 2076. Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


1943 photo is unlikely own work. Real photographer, his/her death year and first publication data are needed to determine copyright status of the photo. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a school; VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freely licensed photographs with a slide containing a copyrighted DW and costumed characters that are likely copyrighted. Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ahligud (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused content related to non-notable musician uploaded for promotional purposes, out of the project scope: d:Q66385497

Nutshinou Talk! 19:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

URAA restored copyright. Memorial in Siilinjärvi, Finland, by Finnish sculptor Väinämö Killinen (Wikidata:Q97634048), died in 1941, memorial unveiled in 1933. Has been PD in Finland since 2012. URAA date of restoration in Finland: January 1, 1996. Will be PD in US in 2029. No FoP in Finland for sculptures, only buildings Htm (talk) 19:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Consuelo (Neus) (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope: plain text. These materials should be maintained as text on a project wiki, not as PDF files.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lamento mi error. Soy una persona mayor. Pedí ayuda para saber como editar pero la verdad es que la respuesta fue muy confusa para mí. Si fuesen tan amables de indicarme qué debo hacer para que se publiquen esos artículos. Muchas gracias Consuelo (Neus) (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lo siento, señora, ninguna posibilidad. Borrar186.175.135.72 23:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Это фото устарело Lysenkov Alexey (talk) 20:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP in France & The author died in 1960. Sémhur (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by ACoolWikiEditor (talk · contribs)

edit

These images are sourced to a NRHP nomination form. These forms are filled out locally, not by federal government employees, so the {{PD-USGov}} license is not applicable.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the image was published (not merely taken) before 1929 as claimed by the license. It is unlikely that the image was even taken by 1929, as the auto shown is a style not generally seen until the 1930s. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Architectphd (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused content related to non-notable architect uploaded for promotional purposes, out of the project scope: ru:Олег Викторович Прокопенко

Nutshinou Talk! 20:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While certain logos look simple enough to be considered a simple shape (e.g. Rotaract old black logo.jpg), several others are way above the threshold of originality and have no permissions from Rotaract.

Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i think some of them are allowed (or can be) for {{Pd-logo}}: like File:Rotaract old black logo.jpg and File:Rotaract old red logo.jpg. GioviPen GP msg 20:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also File:Rotaract France logo.png probably? it contain the standard new logo and a self uploaded self made work; or just a france-shaped border so under threshold. idk GioviPen GP msg 20:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Keep the one i mentioned (too basic) GioviPen GP msg 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gabidulla (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused content related to non-notable foundation uploaded for promotional purposes, out of the project scope: kk:Қатысушы:Gabidulla/Алтын Сапа ИПК

Nutshinou Talk! 20:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 1951 sculpture located in Norway is a work by Norwegian sculptor en:Arnold Haukeland, who died in 1983. So it is still copyrighted in Norway. Per COM:FOP Norway, there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Norway for statues/sculptures etc. (only for architecture), so the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2054. Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States. Sculpture too prominent in image. Nv8200p (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@Nv8200pa Can you just delete the old version of the image? I've cropped out the sculpture. -Another Believer (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That certainly resolved the copyright issue. New image is great. Thanks. Nv8200p (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in the United States Nv8200p (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no freedom of panorama for murals in France. Günther Frager (talk) 21:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. Copyright marked on image. No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Nv8200p (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Screenshot Nv8200p (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Screenshot Nv8200p (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama for 2D artworks in France. Günther Frager (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in France. Günther Frager (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


A very blurry version of File:P80824-133817.jpg Tbi1233 (talk) 21:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thrash (F10, Com:Penis etc) 186.175.232.229 22:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not your WC. Go jerk off somewhere else 186.175.232.229 22:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grabbed from the web: no meta data / https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1846876602060308&id=1441926039222035&set=a.1441926625888643 Albinfo (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my original photograph! Agonsta24 (talk) 02:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a version with meta data? Albinfo (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]