Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 10

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Marshmallych in topic LammyTrammy

CBA Meal

  Pending

B dash (talk) 14:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


FRG2

  Pending

B dash (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

DatBoi2

  Resolved

TimothyJosephWood 14:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Gone. All contribs nuked. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


98.0.46.6

  Resolved

This is a cross-wiki vandal who has been at it on and off since May: see en:User talk:98.0.46.6, where there's a previous block. The user now has an active block from simple:User:Caliburn on Simple Wikipedia. Should I report them somewhere else also, or is there a bureaucrat who can handle this? --Closeapple (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

I've done a 1-month soft block of the range (98.0.0.0/17), and I've revision deleted the vandalism. I've also full protected the inappropriate categories so they can't be created and used again. You can request global blocking of this IP at Meta: (Steward requests/Global). Daphne Lantier 07:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Ashbalalr

  Resolved

Arjayay (talk) 10:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for a week and uploads nuked. Daphne Lantier 23:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

UCLA-Stanford the Ted Thompson draft bowl

  Resolved

UCLA-Stanford the Ted Thompson draft bowl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)

Please nuke the pages created by this cross-wiki vandal. Guanaco (talk) 22:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done Daphne Lantier 23:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Harassment

  Resolved

IPs from the 2601:84:4501:8003:* range have taking to bothering me here on COM. Please see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/StealthForce/Archive#03_August_2017 for reason for harassment. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done Protected your pages for a month and blocked 2601:84:4501:0:0:0:0:0/48 for a couple weeks. Daphne Lantier 20:40, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
@Daphne Lantier: Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

TMXX93

  Resolved

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

User warned. Next time block. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

105.102.70.82

  Resolved

Crasstun (talk | contributions) 11:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for 1 week, and remaining top edits reverted. Thanks for helping! Storkk (talk) 11:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, no problem!   --Crasstun (talk | contributions) 11:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

They're back ad 105.102.13.248 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log --Crasstun (talk | contributions) 14:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Пугачов Иван Петрович

  Not done

Supersonic1888 (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  • No editting history of Пугачов Иван on Commons, and edits by Пугачов Иван Петрович are minor. Request a CU if your adament about this. ~riley (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

105.102.13.248

  Resolved

Supersonic1888 (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked... same edits as the other 105.102 above. Storkk (talk) 15:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
I blocked 105.102.0.0/16 for 3 days. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Lenin's ghost

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Globally locked... what exactly are you requesting? Storkk (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Closed, as account is already globally locked. --Túrelio (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Miriamos

  Resolved

(talk) 17:34, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Vandalized file version deleted, user blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Sushilv115

  Resolved
Note: global lock requested. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Blocked, nuked, and locked. Just in case the global block is denied . --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Giày Guva

  Resolved

Tuanminh01 (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done Uploads deleted, account indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 10:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Thuận JcK

  Resolved

Tuanminh01 (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done Uploads deleted, account indefinitely blocked. --jdx Re: 10:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Hentaiisthegreatest

  Resolved

Bluemersen (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


Indefblocked by Rodhullandemu.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

IP 213.120.234.106

  Resolved

Perhaps for future investigations: Vandalism by IP 213.120.234.106 on my talk page, cf. ”so many sites I can be bad on lol”. Already reverted. — Speravir – 20:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

IP blocked for 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, also for reverting the other vandalism. — Speravir – 21:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Maxkris2001

  Resolved

--Alaa :)..! 17:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done Files tagged, last warning sent. Yann (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

203.92.10.188

  Resolved

Quite possibly the same as 203.92.10.188 (talk · contribs) and blocked Alamat123456 (talk · contribs). -- Tuválkin 14:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a day. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This person, or someone with the same agenda, Special:Diff/256278280 is back as 180.190.55.246 (talk · contribs). -- Tuválkin 09:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
I blocked the IP for 3 days. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sweet100000

  Resolved
Blocked and reverted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Penyair terlarang

  Resolved

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

User has made two silly, bad edits. I've warned them; a block seems to be premature at this time. Guanaco (talk) 09:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
  Agree --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Mikesscorn

  Resolved

WikiPedant (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him for a month (second block). Taivo (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Sunrider53

  Pending

Call of the Nightowl (talk) 00:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Call of the Nightowl: It appears that person has done more useful work on this project than you have.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
I wouldn't call these deletion requests useful, but they aren't vandalism. Guanaco (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G: Wow. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 01:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  Comment I wouldn't call this vandalism, just very unnecessary edits. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 01:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Kong of Lasers: My implementation of en:WP:BOOMERANG. Sorry if I was offensive or too acerbic or sarcastic. FYI, en:User:Jeff G registered on enwp about 5.5 months before I did, so I was unable to use that name,   — Jeff G. ツ 13:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Con Creegan

  Done

Sro23 (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked indef. --JuTa 06:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

14.203.99.67

Guanaco (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)   Done

Motorschubkarre kaufen

  Resolved

BuschBohne (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Spammer blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

E4024

  Resolved

❣Paseyn msg 12:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked Paseyn for 3 days due to edit warring. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Jesuschrist2017

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Last warning sent, files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Джими Хендерсон хуесос

  Resolved

Jimi Henderson (talk) 23:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Account blocked indefinitely, edits hidden/deleted. --jdx Re: 02:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


2003:E6:33D7:D700:2:8FF:FE01:D8FC

  Resolved

Jimi Henderson (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for six months (proxy), edits hidden/deleted. --jdx Re: 02:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Aryan823

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I warned Aryan and deleted all his contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Filgueira

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 06:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. All his uploads so far have been copyright violations. I blocked him for a month. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Chinno Exhibition

  Resolved

UAwiki (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done One week for a start. Yann (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Ras67

  Pending

B dash (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

You are are wrong! These are free NASA works, not allegedly copyvio images, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! Please inform yourself, this "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  Comment These files look like OK. Certainly no reason for a block. Please discuss if there is any issue. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

IKW-CV70

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked by Yann indef for abusing multiple accounts. Guanaco (talk) 08:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

User:The Rejector

  Resolved

Cats' photos (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indefinitely by Rodhullandemu. --jdx Re: 05:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

2602:30A:2E7E:D810:B4C6:CCD3:7290:5810

  Resolved

Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a month. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


162.231.237.129 + 98.143.148.138

  Resolved

Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Already blocked for one week by User:Jdx. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Elie H Abouaoun

  Pending

O1lI0 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Elie Abouaoun

  Resolved

O1lI0 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. Account is not registered, nothing to do here. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

EliesAbouaouns

  Pending

O1lI0 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

ElieAbouaouns.

  Resolved

O1lI0 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. Account is not registered, nothing to de here. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

ElieAbouaouns

  Pending

O1lI0 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

207.195.79.250

  Resolved

Justin (koavf)TCM 18:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

  Stale
Hasn't edited for over four hours; will consider block if this recurs. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


Doriforth

  Resolved

Guanaco (talk) 23:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: ,   Support after all the vandalism is directed towards my userpage. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 23:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
  Done. Vandalem-only account. Blocked indefinitely, vandalism is reverted. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

175.141.35.232

  Resolved

Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. After you warned the IP, vandalism has stopped. No other action is needed now. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

FromAbove

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


  Done 17:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC) PumpkinSky (talk | contribs) blocked FromAbove (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (obvious disruptive sock)   — Jeff G. ツ 18:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons uploader

  Resolved

Guanaco (talk) 02:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#Commons uploader.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
  Done Blocked indefinitely by Jmabel. --jdx Re: 05:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiVandal

  Resolved

Guanaco (talk) 01:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indefinitely both Hystrix (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Gvl 20

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him/her for a week and will delete his last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Mr.RJ78

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Additional vacation for quarter of year. Taivo (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


Anthony De Guzman

  Resolved
  Done. I blocked Anthony for a week and mass deleted all his contributions. Taivo (talk) 07:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

JerryLogan99

  Resolved

Guanaco (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indefinitely. --jdx Re: 02:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

various advertisment uploading accounts

All accounts show notorius the same habits: create new account; upload some advertisment, copyvio or screenshot pics; place commercial text and weblink into pic description; create next account and so on... See individual contributions and also [1], [2] (recent deleted files) Foreign Species (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


  Done + CU --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

EliesAbouaouns

  Pending

O1lI0 (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

  Done All blocked, except the last one which doesn't exist on Commons. Yann (talk) 08:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Mark Bowman

  Resolved

Only (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Blocked indef. Guanaco (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
@Guanaco: thanks for the block. You may need to revoke talk page access eventually as we had to on the other two. Only (talk) 16:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and do that now, so hopefully I can get some sleep. Guanaco (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

24.117.145.226 (talk · contribs)

  Resolved

Could someone blitz this vandalism? -- (talk) 18:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done It's dynamic IP, so I've blocked it only for a day. --jdx Re: 19:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

195.77.33.137

  Resolved

Magnolia677 (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done This IP has not been active on Commons since May. You should have reported him/her on d:WD:AN. Anyway, his/her edits on WD have been reverted. --jdx Re: 14:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Gogeta27

  Resolved

Txolo (talk) 02:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done User warned, uploads speedy deleted. --jdx Re: 07:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Jfjop9843

  Resolved

Can you remove and protect against recreation File:Johan Archiles.jpg (see the journal) ?

Thanks. Habertix (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

I blocked the uploader indefinitely and deleted all his contributions. Also I added file:Johan Archiles.jpg into my watchlist. This helps me to discover new sockpuppets. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Carlos el crak

  Resolved

Ovruni (talk) 02:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Nuked and warned. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Erowid

  Stale

158.182.231.96 05:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. This account has not edited since 2012, and we have no way of confirming that Erowid is INC, unless Erowid logs in and starts editing. Guanaco (talk) 06:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

BartosCSIstvan

  Resolved

Mihai (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

The cross-wiki vandalism appears to be coming from anonymous IP users. You can request a global block at m:Steward requests/Global. There isn't much to be done on Commons, except that I deleted the image as a likely copyright violation. Guanaco (talk) 16:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Blocked, protection on WD requested. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Leonard Reeves

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

SonyXperia2017

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Blocked for 3 days. Guanaco (talk) 05:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Dschwen

  Pending

тнояsтеn 12:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Same again. --тнояsтеn 16:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Re-blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

And again... --тнояsтеn 20:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Re-re-blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Again. :-( --XRay talk 07:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

The bot seems to run without supervision. Please block indefinitely until Dschwen takes a look at this. --тнояsтеn 08:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Just to clarify the original report, Wikimedia Commons has no policies that prohibit running automated edits from a non-bot account. The bot flag is only required when the type of mass edits would be considered disruptive on the recent changes queues. Some contributors may have in mind Wikipedia's very strict policies that force most new automation to go through a bot review board, however on this project tasks like housekeeping of image pages using AWB or similar are welcome if they are helpful and remain uncontested. This comment is general and not an assessment of whether Dschwen's edits were okay without using their bot account. -- (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Bot account or not... some (a lot?) of the edits are not OK, see different complaints on User talk:Dschwen. So the bot should not run as long as its maintainer has not responded or even seen those complaints. --тнояsтеn 17:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Dschwen-bot blocked. Hope we can unblock soon, the bot is doing several other important tasks without problems. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey fellow commonists. Sorry about this mess. The backstory here is that I switched over some bots from deprecated password based authentication to OAuth. The Mediawiki instructions for Wikimedia sites (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikibot/OAuth/Wikimedia) say

OAuth allows your bot to use your primary account in a secure way, limited to whatever permissions you grant. The old way of having a separate bot account and primary account and using the latter only for actions which need extra permissions is not necessary (and not yet supported either); you can always use your primary account.

(Emphasis mine). So I added two OAuth consumers with tailored (reduced) rights. One for each bot. In the consumer application I descibed teh bots (and listed them as the applications using the credentials). I just tried to obtain credentials under the bot accounts. This doesn't work (my bot accounts do not have sufficient privileges on meta). It seems that Commons policy is a bit behind the technological state here. An issue I see is that the bot edits are not tagged according to the OAuth consumers they use. That makes them hard to filter out :-/. What should we do about that? In any case switching back to password based bot accounts is not an option. This _constantly_ failed and is deprecated now anyways. Cheers --Dschwen (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC) (Ping Steinsplitter, Hedwig in Washington, XRay, тнояsтеn)

@Dschwen: I'm pretty sure registering an owner-only consumer does not require special permissions on meta. The thing about separating accounts is that, if your bot go haywire, the bot can be blocked and you can still edit normally. With oauth, yes you can control what grants are given, but we cannot block that oauth consumer; you get blocked when the bot code go haywire. In other words, you are responsible for all actions under your account.
Also, I do think you misunderstood what is meant on mw:Manual:Pywikibot/OAuth/Wikimedia. It concerns usage of multiple bot accounts such as User:CommonsDelinker and User:CommonsDelinkerHelper, a helper with a higher privilege than the main, using two pywikibot configurations. What is meant by it not being supported is that with OAuth pywikibot will no longer switch between two accounts. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
BTW, AFAICT, neither enwp nor meta recommend using your main human account to run bots... --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Stupid question: Can you get the necessary rights for your bot(s) on meta? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
No, but the domain of an oauth consumer can be specified, which you can set to commons. The consumer would only be used to login to commons and use whatever rights the account has on commons. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiVāndāl2.0

  Resolved
  Done Blocked indef. Guanaco (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Sahand Ace

  Stale

B dash (talk) 15:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. No activity from this account since April. The final warning was given in September. Guanaco (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Drufft

  Resolved


White Trash Gangster

  Resolved

Rschen7754 02:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Blocked indefinitely by Josve05a, edits are reverted and hidden. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Johnny Test is Back

  Resolved

209.249.5.140 23:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done. The account is globally locked, you reverted the only edit. Taivo (talk) 06:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Важкі часи

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely. Rudolphous (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


AnettaClaire1999

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Blocked, wep. Utterly selfish and immature. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Lorenz Clormann

  Pending

Fraknö (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

  • I've tagged the remaining image as "no permission". The user's name suggests a relation to the subject of the photos, so I'll assume good faith here. I explained on their talk page what needs to be done to keep the images. Guanaco (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
    If you compare the current tagged image with his first deleted image, for which he stated [3] that he took it from a "highly paid professional photographer", it might be worthwile to compare the Exif data. If identical, the latest image is also from that other author. --Fraknö (talk) 19:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Fraknö, i have a full buyout deal with the photographer. Im working in Advertising and full buyout means that the photographer transmits all rights to the buyer. what do you suggest to do? And believe me, i really want to write the article correctly, but no one is helping me. just bashing. --Lorenz Clormann (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
@Lorenz Clormann: Please email our permissions team at permissions-commons wikimedia.org. Guanaco (talk) 20:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


The Tin Drummer

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 01:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Goldbladed

  Pending

Goodshort (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

I've deleted the uploads and given a final warning. Guanaco (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
OK, I will post there next time :-). Goodshort (talk) 08:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

INeverCry sockpuppet: false positive?

Hi all. I blocked 109.238.80.74 (talk · contribs) and 109.238.80.47 (talk · contribs) for a month, because (s)he created a lot of deletion requests with rationale "Out of scope: unused personal image.", just like INC does. The IP claimed, that this is not INC and (s)he is unfairly blocked. What do you think? Taivo (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

The IP writes in Russian, but maybe you remember: INC claimed to speak Russian too and some his sockpuppets wear Ukrainian names. Taivo (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Hello everybody! My name is D, I'm from the suburbs of Moscow and no one's puppet. All of these DR at UPF were done by me, 90% of these photos I found in the subcategories of Category:Media needing categories requiring human attention, a small part was from Category:User page images (of course unused, too). And, as I understand, there are no complaints to DR, because they are fair and have been satisfied. If necessary, I am ready to prove that I am me, and associate me with someone is wrong. Just tell me how. With muscovites can even met in person for coffee/beer :) And Yes, I have a dynamic ip (from the network 109.238.80.xx) and in my opinion, its the only thing you can blame me. With respect, 109.238.80.85 11:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Just a minor detail: INC proxies, say User:Enrique Vasquez-Valenzuela use (-) between "out of scope" and "unused"; and not (:). Sounds funny to me, because someone who made a socking claim about me several years ago, somewhere else, attracted the attention to the fact that both users put a period (dot) at the end of their edit summaries... (I'm sure if the edit summary was a question, they both used a question mark at the end of the sentence. :) As long as proxies or socks do good edits, let them do so; but never give them any "buttons". That's my opinion. Please don't lynch me. :) --E4024 (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
I unblocked the IP-s. You convinced, that you are not INC, by offering coffee/beer. INC has never done that. Unfortunately I have not been in Moscow since 1992 and now visa is required. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe someday we cross paths, my friends and I thinking for a long time about a road trip along the Baltic sea coast, but something always stoped us. And to be clear, when I had a free minute, looked through image and made bookmarks. And when I had a free hour, copied reason to the clipboard and do many DRs. Can I continue do like this? With respects, 109.238.80.85 15:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, you can do that. I have myself text file with reasons for closing DRs and then copy-paste. (Of course, I advice to work under username. It makes easier to understand, who's who.) Taivo (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

J0pavam

  Resolved

Serhio Magpie (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done Account blocked indefinitely. --jdx Re: 00:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

hujwamwdupe

  Resolved
  Done Blocked. BTW. I'm not sure if it is in Sorbian, for sure it is in Polish. --jdx Re: 16:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
No such thing as "indefbanned" in enwiki.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


User:Cool_scripts_tester_228/common.js

  Resolved

Abiyoyo (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done Script deleted, account blocked indefinitely. Guanaco (talk) 23:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Rkdskaeovy

  Resolved

Offnfopt(talk) 08:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indefinitely. --jdx Re: 08:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


Smiling dog

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 21:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


  Done 21:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC) Jcb (talk | contribs) blocked Smiling dog (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Vandalism).   — Jeff G. ツ 21:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

109.238.80.74

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

  Oppose There's no evidence of an open proxy, and the editing pattern isn't consistent like a bot's typically would be. The IP was also investigated as a possible INC sock, and Taivo decided it's not. I agree with his assessment. Guanaco (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


JCVDwojownikbiały (Wikinger's sock)

  Resolved

~Cybularny Speak? 19:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

46.134.188.220

  Resolved
  Not done. That's right, definitely (s)he's not a newbie. But as no vandalism has happened, I see no reason to take any action. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

X2u2y2a2d2m2i2n2a2m

  Resolved

Serhio Magpie (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done. The user is indefinitely blocked, all contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Blvk

  Not done

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 11:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

This is stale; user hasn't contributed since March 2016. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
I did delete one of their contributions, and I'll delete the other after it's been globally replaced. Waiting on the delinker now. Guanaco (talk) 11:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)   Done 11:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


Anton V.

  Pending

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 11:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

  Not done I warned the user. Please try to explain things before reporting. Also, this board is only for blatant vandalism and spam. General clear-cut block requests can go to COM:AN/B; difficult cases requiring discussion go to COM:AN/U. Guanaco (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
THX a lot, but the user was warned in the past. I don't see any reason, why Anton V. should do it better in future... hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 12:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
I don't see a specific explanation about this issue in the past. A lot of people have no idea how copyright works, so sometimes words work better than blocks. Guanaco (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
The quick removal template is removed if its location is unreasonable.

The file descriptions and the entry in the discussion page were added after the template was installed. Further, the file was deleted without basis without discussion by one of the participants referring to articles not corresponding to this situation from the rules. Anton V. (talk)

@Anton V.: If you believe my deletion was wrong, please start a request at COM:UDEL. Guanaco (talk) 12:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Carolus

Moved to COM:ANU. This page is for reports of ongoing vandalism, which need immediate attention. This is not a place for disputes between legitimate users. Guanaco (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


Ад1мины ш1люхи

  Resolved

Jimi Henderson (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked indefinitely. --jdx Re: 20:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

36.79.6.226

  Resolved

Jimi Henderson (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for three days. --jdx Re: 20:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Kunal rakshit

  Not done

JaneySamuelsMA

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 05:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done 05:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Guanaco (talk | contribs) changed block settings for JaneySamuelsMA (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Abusing multiple accounts)
  — Jeff G. ツ 05:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: There is involved you to participate to the global ban of INeverCry. See m:Requests for comment/Global ban of INeverCry 2 99.109.85.105 06:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
  Done in these edits over four days ago. Thanks for your concern.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Reefer Wolfowitz

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 23:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Feel free to block longer. Yann (talk) 23:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
It's another INC sock, I've indeffed. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


Brij267840 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Probably INC.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Vojael

  Pending
  • User: Vojael (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: Apologies if I am in the wrong forum, I am not that familiar with Commons procedures. The noted user has made a lot of uploads which may be copyright violations. I've checked through a whole bunch (but not all), and they all seem to be the same issue. They have an unknown author, and are sourced to http://zeleznice.in.rs which is a train enthusiast web forum. The claimed license is CC-BY-SA 4.0 but there is no such license provided on the site and the google translation to English on the footer of the main page explicitly contradicts the claimed license ("All rights belong to Serbian railroad enthusiasts"). Can these be reviewed by an administrator and bulk removed instead of nominating each one individually?

Whpq (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

@Whpq: Hey there, the best way to batch-nominate is by enabling a gadget called "VisualFileChange" (the last tool in the maintenence tools section). I agree with the questionable copyright status and that we're going to need a lot more information to be satisfied that they're actually available under that license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
@Jon Kolbert: Thanks for the tip. I've enabled the gadget and mass nominated the appropriate files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vojael. This request can be considered closed. -- Whpq (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

177.128.156.117

  Resolved

 HarvettFox  96   10:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Joe Barton

  Resolved

k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


Lukabanjac

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 02:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Blocked 3 days. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

LeonardooG

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

3 days break, next time longer. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Cock Sparrow

  Resolved

Chico512   15:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Nothing at all. I have been accused falsely of sabotaging, that is quite indifferent to me because in my historial of contributions it's obviously not.

I just want Taichi to edit the comment that has left me in my user where he calls me a liar. That's all. Cock Sparrow (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked one week, talk page access revoked. This is an eswiki issue and should be left there. Guanaco (talk) 15:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Giovediundeo

  Resolved
Note: searching for user in the CentralAuth I found that he's doing a "crosswiki copyvio": he is substituting licensed images of politicians with "his" pictures. At enwiki (with an edit war too -note: all edits rollbacked), frwiki despite a rollback, eswiki, ruwiki, svwiki, and was indef banned from itwiki per block evasion. Btw, looking at this this edit war at enwiki, to the uninterrupted files' upload here (despite any warning), he seems not interested to the concepts of collaboration and copyright. I'll request a global lock. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Note 2: To confirm my suspects about Street View pictures (as said above), I did an attempt. I searched for "Chiesa Pollenza" on Google Maps and found this GSW image: perfectly identical. Please, note the 3 cars in both pictures: the white and long one, the light blue and the silver one. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
I blocked him indefinitely. Uploads are nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Reblocked for a week only. Yann (talk) 13:17, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

विनायक कटक

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Daniella10171989

  Resolved

Sro23 (talk) 08:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

G

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

@Tiven2240 and MusikAnimal (WMF): It is always a good idea, if you do not understand something, to ask first. Not to do page moves, DRs and Vandalism notices. The files you nominated for deletion are a part of a proposal to the current tech wishlist survey. They are uploaded to demonstrate the functionality of a proposed mediawiki extension. As this extension does not exist yet, I use the naming scheme of ".thumb.gif" which you broke with your change. Would you please be so kind and move back the file, and close the DR and this report? Thanks. --𝔊 (Gradzeichen DiſkTalk) 20:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

I guess I was pinged to confirm there is a proposal using these images. This is true, it's at Turn Stereoskopie into a MediaWiki Extension. I don't know if these images are still out of scope or named improperly, but it certainly isn't vandalism. MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
I would consider them as being in scope at least for the duration the Community Wishlist is open and active, if perhaps not permanently. If you could remedy the issues you've caused, Tiven2240, that would be appreciated. I would suggest, in future, double checking the global account of an uploader in a case such as this, and if they're an existing contributor to WMF projects, ask them what they're doing, ask if you can help, and perhaps consider providing useful advice, rather than filing a report and labelling them a vandal. Nick (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
@Nick, MusikAnimal (WMF), and G: If such is the case I would request to at least add template to the files that are for used for demonstration so it won't cause any problem in future. Thanks. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 01:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

THE ARCHANGEL MICHAEL

  Resolved

Gereon K. (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

  Blocked --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Exodasius

  Pending
  • User: Exodasius (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: apparent vandalism on image file File:IvyLeagueLocations.png by keeping adding "Western" to the map of Ivy League colleges despite my reversion. Exodasius also seemingly unabled me from reverting the vandalized file back and even leaves a message on my "talk" Wikipedia page saying me committing vandalism. Blocking from editing recommended.

Taekhosong (talk) 06:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

  • User: Template:Defendent
  • Defense: I provided my justification for adding "Western" to the map of Ivey league universities. It is clear from Taekhosong's lack of reading comprehension and incomprehension of English grammatical structures and flows that he is not a native of the English language. I do not recommend a punishment for this incorrect report as it is clear that there is a language barrier at work here. I do recommend that Taekhosong is reprimanded and I request that he sticks to editing on the Wikipedia where the language is one that he is natively proficient in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exodasius (talk • contribs) 07:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a clearly ridiculous claim. A similar name does not an Ivy League school make. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Please provide sources for your claim in which "Western" is listed as one of the Ivy League colleges, if there is any. Additionally, your last post also contains personal attack, which I shall request the administrator to take into consideration as s/he proceeds with the intervention. Taekhosong (talk) 07:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Nganchunyin

  Resolved
  Done You warned the user, all his/her contributions are deleted. Next time block. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

INeverCry is back

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Meepsheepy — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.21.192.95 (talk) 20:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

  ResolvedDuplicste report, account blocked by Guanaco.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

156.197.14.22

  Resolved

 HarvettFox  96   20:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

User:PS S nine

  Resolved

— Luchesar • T/C/U 19:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Indeffed. Appears only here to harass people. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

HKLBK

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him/her for a week. In my opinion all copyvios are deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)


Manuscriptus

  Resolved

thanks. zzuuzz (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done. Thanks Jon for your help. Guanaco (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

TwoDogsClucking

  Resolved

71.35.141.250 13:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Deleted racist vandalism and blocked uploader indefinitely. —RP88 (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

134.119.205.15

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 14:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Pringles3000

Pringles3000 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi, I indef. blocked the aforementioned account. It seems to be a single purpose account who is just here to argue about the monkey selfie case (creating disruptive DR's to make a COM:POINT). Second opinion? --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

  Support Clearly a sockpuppet, clearly a troll. Good block. Guanaco (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
  Support Good. I would delete Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg instead of closing it. Yann (talk) 21:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Lextrack

  Resolved

Stang 06:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done Agreed. No useful contributions. Yann (talk) 08:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

David Adam Kess

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ 23:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

You could also block him for repeated category spamming. He was told many times not to overcategorize his files, but once again Category:Quito is filled with his files that belong to a deeper level. --Sitacuisses (talk) 00:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for another month for disruptive editing. Guanaco (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


71.218.13.215

  Resolved

RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Jsonparser

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him indefinitely as spam-only user. Cleaning his edits now. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

MiningInfo

  Resolved

JD {æ} 21:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. The user has uploaded exactly 1 image, which is nominated for deletion. No other action is needed at moment. Only 1 edit was linkspam and you reverted that. This is simply new and unexperienced user. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
this "unexperienced" user posts affiliate links [5]; one only does that on purpose. he is already blocked on de.wp and en.wp for doing that. --JD {æ} 02:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I saw it. That's only one edit and it was reverted. If (s)he continues, then some action is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

61.123.23.217

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 13:47, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week. All his/her edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

LeonardooG

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him for 3 months. This was not his first block. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Williamluk atletico

  Resolved

222.167.166.187 03:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

What are the worst ones?   — Jeff G. ツ 08:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
For example, File:Jan_Oblak_with_Atletico_Madrid_supporters.jpg 222.167.166.187 10:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
  Done. I deleted the mentioned file with derivative work. As the user is not very active and has no deleted contributions for years, blocking is not needed. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Baron Frankenstein

  Pending

Nobody perfect (talk) 14:37, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Bird_Person

  Pending

Nobody perfect (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jerry Dandridge that I started back in October came back as "inconclusive". LX (talk, contribs) 14:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Please check edit history. He is adding typical Jerry-type uploads and voting "keep" for files from his other sockpuppets. Also uploading new versions of images from blocked sockpuppet. --Nobody perfect (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
I always check the edit history before filing a checkuser request, and I wouldn't have filed one if I didn't think the evidence was compelling. The result was surprising to me. LX (talk, contribs) 09:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Dsmatthews

  Pending

Fleet Command (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Codename Lisa and Fleet Command are probably the same person, Sockpuppet, or brigading Meatpuppet and they are trolls, look at their history. They are just trying to create drama for the sake of it. Given Codename Lisa has some association with Microspoft their current interference with a FOSS project page and similar behavior in the past should be seen as malicious. I request that action be taken against both of those users to prevent further disruptive and vexatious conduct. Furthermore I'd like to point out that due to their posts being done while "puppeting" they should not be treated as if they have the same rights as a user who is making a normal edit or comment and should be subject to removal when they are vexatious, dishonest or disruptive. --Dsmatthews (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Oh, cool! Another re-run of the show called "User:X is User:Y's sockpuppet because they disagree with me!" This time on Commons, and with a twist too: (Drumroll...) Connection to Microsoft! In fact this drama is popular on English Wikipedia that two parodies are made of it: All socks and Being Evil 101.
Joke aside, I am vetted against six different editors in English Wikipedia, including FleetCommand. Here on Commons, User:Jameslwoodward check-usered me against FleetCommand the very first minute I stepped in here. (I kept his emails too.) I don't mind you people checkuser me again... that's if you truely believe there is merit in the words of a person whose history of interaction in all projects have been 100% passive-aggressive behavior.
The only thing that slightly annoys me is that this user does not indent his message properly. ;)
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
A related note, Ronhjones has issued a warning to this user to cease vandalizing. Well, he has switched to casting aspersions instead. —Codename Lisa (talk) 01:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Nidou

  Pending

Pierre cb (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Ammazzavampiri

  Pending

Nobody perfect (talk) 14:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

See [6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nobody perfect (talk • contribs) 14:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
I’ve just reverted a couple of instances of this user replacing others’ signatures in DRs. It may be intended as an acknowledgement of alternate accounts or something, but regardless this seems highly irregular.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Dowasorma

  Resolved

Seewolf (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the user for a month and deleted all created pages. All other edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Now the account is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

LoganJohn

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

14.207.17.59

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

More specifically, death threats in these edits.   — Jeff G. ツ 09:45, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
  Done by Taivo.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


Goldmatters

  Pending

Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Oldeastco

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I deleted the userpage. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

203.180.41.60

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


114.170.84.213

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week and you reverted the edits. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

153.176.35.212

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week and you reverted the edits. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

153.189.5.139

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 14:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

126.94.223.182

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

49.104.3.245

  Resolved

Morio (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP for a week. Edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

DylanDean

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him for a week due to edit warring. (And, of course, no talk page access!) All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

50.203.175.203

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for a week. Guanaco (talk) 13:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Somsak Ung

User:Somsak Ung is making disruptive edits, tagging files with deletion templates (without creating discussion pages) based on groundless claims. These edits were probably made out of spite as I recently tagged two of his uploads as missing permission. I don't believe such disruptive edits need to be entertained. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Paul_012's picture incredibility is really own work.--Somsak Ung (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
@Somsak Ung: Is there a reason you don't think it's his own work? We need evidence of a copyright violation to delete these images. Guanaco (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
So you mean, if his picture not violation anybody, that's okay to keep it? and i ask something, how's about my upload?--Somsak Ung (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
I didn't see any image that you tagged for deletion (improperly) Somsak Ung, in the uploads of Paul_012 that makes me think the uploads are not scope or own work. I would almost call it harassment but i'd chalk it up to just a bad mood unless it continues. I think the (improperly made) DR's should be closed as Keep, I see no copyvio there. I do now have questions about Somsak Ung's 2 uploads but I didn't get into the sourcing too much so I'm not nominating them. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
So... should the incomplete deletion templates be removed? --Paul_012 (talk) 02:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Well this is found 22,500,000 places on the web so it very well may not be copyrighted but I don't know since this looks like a recent picture. If it's not copyrighted I don't want to tag it improperly. If it is not done properly it is liable to be nominated for DR again in the future because the tags are wrong. I could take an educated guess but would an admin care to weigh in since according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Thailand there should be copyright protection on this. As for this one I'm not sure if that is a copyrighted logo or if it is simple enough not to qualify as one, if that applies at all to a Thai music school, or no copyright protection is on the logo in Thailand. So I'd like another opinion. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I was asking about the tags Somsak Ung added to my uploads. But since it's been brought up, the royal portraits are released to the public for general use, and a free-as-in-beer to download, but were never specified to be without copyright restrictions. (And the Thai government does retain copyright over works created under its employment.) One should assume that modifications, for example, are not allowed (and may result in harsh legal actions not limited to copyright, but that's a separate issue). --Paul_012 (talk) 11:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm glad you told me all that, learn something new every day! But as to the (incomplete) DR tags; We need a real reason to suspect a copyvio. I did a google image search and didn't find any of your images anywhere else. That isn't definitive proof one way or the other but it doesn't support this being a copyvio. Therefor I'd support removing the DR tags. If someone wants to make a real claim of a copyvio they can file a real DR. I also looked through the edit history and didn't see any evidence of Edit warring on the part of either party. Does any admin have an objection to the removal of the (incomplete) DR tags? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:11, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
I got rid of the bad DR tags. As for Somsak Ung, the way I'm understanding Thai copyright law, File:King_Vajiralongkorn_2017.jpg doesn't sound like file we can host. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


Ta6513647

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

A.Savin has binned the contribs (see COM:AN) and Andy Dingley has initiated a conversation. Probably still worth keeping an eye on, though.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

User:I've seen better days

Sockpuppet of INC? Taivo (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

I would say so. Guanaco (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


History1245789

  Pending

Sfs90 (talk) 16:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

For some more input on the issue, I bring you to this sockpuppet investigation in Wikipedia, where more evidence is presented that this user's edits (coupled with those of his socks) are only for the sake of being disruptive.
In respect to the specific issue in the Commons, this revolves around the file I uploaded (File:CataloniaParliamentDiagram2017.svg) and the ones this user uploaded (File:New Catalan2017parliament.svg, File:Improved2017Catalunya parliament.svg). I first uploaded a gray version of the diagram on 19 November ahead of the election, then kept updating it as results came in. The final diagram with Cs at 37 and PP at 3 was uploaded in File:CataloniaParliamentDiagram2017.svg at 22:52, 21 Dec 2017, then this user re-uploaded it as File:Improved2017Catalunya parliament.svg at 23:02, 21 Dec 2017. This came after a previous update (the one with Cs at 36 and PP at 4) was first uploaded in File:CataloniaParliamentDiagram2017.svg at 21:52, 21 Dec 2017, yet this user had re-uploaded it as File:New Catalan2017parliament.svg at 22:35, 21 Dec 2017.
He seems to be using these uploaded images in his disruptive edits in the English Wikipedia too. Impru20 (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
I understand the Catalan elections is a contentious topic at the moment - as I was going through the RTRC I found History1245789 Vandalized this vandalism report. Looking through the contributions of both users it appears they both may need a small Christmas break for edit warring. Vandalizing a vandalism report though is beyond line. If you have a problem with a user take it to User problems, you don't change a vandalism report to indite the other user by changing the names on the report. That's just ridiculous. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
The user has been vandalizing all over the English Wikipedia as well, being a sockpuppet under investigation with his socks having been blocked several times (a whole IP range had to be blocked to prevent him from continuing on his vandalism, yet he has kept doing so under this account). I reverted him here already knowing he was a vandal there, and he has also engaged in vandalic behaviour here. If you also wish to give a "Christmas break", so be it, but you should keep that in mind and that I was merely reverting what were obvious acts of vandalism, as his "speedy deletion request" on File:CataloniaParliamentDiagram2017.svg was merely a vandalic act in response for me having tagged his files for speedy deletion (note how he merely copy-pasted my own speedy deletion request on File:Improved2017Catalunya parliament.svg, just changing the file link; diff1 diff 2 (check the hours)). He went berserk from there keeping adding the tag on File:CataloniaParliamentDiagram2017.svg under a clearly wrong premise, as upload times are crystal clear, and kept doing so despite repeated warnings from myself and Sfs90. Impru20 (talk) 17:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
User has kept vandalizing this page: diff1 diff2 diff3 diff4. Impru20 (talk) 17:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
I apologize. I was unaware of the sockpuppet investigation when I found this a few minutes ago. If you are fighting vandalism by all means do so! We need all the help we can get! I don't think Impru20 should be blocked. A tap on the shoulder should do. I just personally avoid the appearance of an edit war and if a vandal is so determined to keep up this activity I bring it to AN/U so an admin can ban/rollback again/nuke it all depending on what's appropriate rather then fighting them over and over. So when I see 3RR's I get suspicious. I looked at this history of this Vandal Report and History1245789 is even violating 3RR/vandalizing this report. To me, this shows good faith on your part and I'm sorry I grouped you both in the same group. Were you both edit warring? Yes. But, I don't really think this is true edit warring. You're trying to stop vandalism. He's vandalizing. That's pretty simple. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

3rd Eye Advisory

  Pending

Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

3rd Eye Advisory

  Pending

Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Zfx610

  Resolved

Painjet (talk) 07:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done 已删,并给了警告 --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikinger

  Resolved

63.142.254.233 18:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Also please mark all his puppets as socks of Wikinger just like that User_talk:SatanManson#You_have_been_blocked_for_a_duration_of_2_weeks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.142.254.233 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 28 December 2017‎ (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Jean_Lomax Special:Contributions/Jean_Lomaks another Wikinger sock. FOR immediate BAN. He successfully deceives polish admins: w:pl:Specjalna:Wkład/Jean_Lomax w:pl:Specjalna:Wkład/Jean_Lomaks. Global block needed. Also some pl-wiki advice from stewards too. 37.123.101.151 11:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

174.16.118.49

  Resolved

RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for a week. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

User Kuplop

  Resolved

Please block User Kuplop who deliberately inserts false information on the description of this page [[8]]. I corrected it several times but he has been starting again every time [[9]]. Κοινὴ διάλεκτος (talk, contribs) 23:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

I've protected it. COM:Edit wars are not the way to dispute a file description or name. Note that I'm not endorsing the current version of the text; indeed it should probably be some version of Constantin Cheynet's name given that Kuplop themselves gave a link in the DR supporting that, so the actual identification doesn't seem to be in serious dispute. I will leave decisions regarding any sanctions to other admins, so I'm not marking this as resolved. Storkk (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Storkk (talk), thank you for the protection of this page. Can you please also restore the picture description, which must be : "Constantin Cheynet de Beaupré en uniforme de lieutenant du 38e régiment d'artillerie monté" ?
Also, considering the message of Odysseus1479 (talk) below, I precise that I own two original versions of this picture. The photographer is Jacques Bert (1821-1887), active in Nîmes since about 1862 (for more information about this photographer, see [[10]]). The two pictures that I own are signed "J. Bert, Nîmes, 24, rue Jean Reboul"). I actually scanned one of this two pictures before uploading. If you think that it is appropriate, you might also specify the name of the photographer, Jacques Bert (Nîmes). For me, I am only the "scanneur".
Constantin Cheynet de Beaupré was lieutenant at the 38e régiment d'artillerie monté, in Nîmes (France), from 1876 to 1878.
Best regards,
Κοινὴ διάλεκτος (talk, contribs) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
@Κοινὴ διάλεκτος: I've updated the author, etc. per your information above. I've left the person's name as "Constantin Cheynet" as that much does not seem to be in dispute, but "de Beaupré" seems to be disputed, both by Kuplop and the website they pointed to. Please attempt to form some kind of consensus on the file talk page regarding his name, and then use an {{Edit request}} if appropriate. Storkk (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Storkk (talk), it's all right for me. I'll try to obtain a consensus about the description.
Regards,
Κοινὴ διάλεκτος (talk, contribs) 19:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I notice the file in question is sourced as “own work“; I presume this refers to the scan or second-generation photo made by the uploader. But since there is no author or provenance given for the original photo, if it weren’t for the protection I’d have tagged it with {{Dw no source since}}. (If the photographer is unknown, that’s fine—just say so, but “own work” is quite inadequate.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Gabriella Ruiz-Campos

  Resolved

Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already blocked by Herbythyme. Yann (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)


Raymondskie99

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already blocked by Guanaco Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

42.113.198.224 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Vandalism of my talk page, and creation of fake archive. Artix Kreiger (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for a month. We don't tolerate this sort of thing. Rodhullandemu (talk) 02:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


Constanza Zenere

Banfield - Amenazas aquí 13:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Rajkumar kar

  Done

Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

  Blocked for 3 months. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


AbdallahAbdullah

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

User page deleted, on my watchlist. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

42.113.198.242 (talk · contribs)

vandalism. Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

  Blocked for 1 week. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

47.34.138.24

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done. blocked for a day. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Khrapunov (talk · contribs)

  Pending
  • Reasons for reporting: Adding OTRS permission by non-OTRS member on several photos.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

As the ticket is today, rather than vandalism they might have got confused about what to do after sending in an email. -- (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
You could be right but doing it several times I thought I would bring it to someones attention. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


Parge Lenis

  Resolved
  • User: Parge Lenis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: See File:Pure Beauty.jpg. Yeah, large penis, haha--on en-wiki I just CU-blocked a couple of joker accounts, including User:RATHER LARGE, also obviously well-endowed, and socks of User:Dweemer3215. They all added this picture to various articles. Thanks!

Drmies (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Toppole69

  Resolved

W3ird N3rd (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  Comment I added 2 warnings for now. Yann (talk) 04:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. He has been messing around for half a year on several wikis though. Most of it was already reverted and I cleaned up everything that wasn't. (except for the mediawiki link) He was told at wikimedia to stop, it would seem that he did for a while but now he's here. Good faith, good faith, good faith.. I don't know if you can configure his account so that every edit he makes is double checked, but that would be a good idea if possible. Is there some way I can also put him on my own watchlist? W3ird N3rd (talk) 06:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
An anonymous IP changed this section from "Pending" to "Resolved". (that should never happen) I have just undone that, as Toppole69 hasn't learned anything. Alexis Jazz (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
  Not done. This is problem of en.wiki. Do not bring problems from other projects into Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: this user does not care which Wiki they are screwing up. Now he needs to be taken care of on 6 wikis seperately and a few dozen more in the future when he starts to vandalise other language Wiki projects? (he already has done that on si.wiki) Toppole hasn't even proven yet to be capable of speaking any language beyond saying "fy". Am I supposed to now follow Toppole everywhere he goes and revert any edits that are missed by others? Alexis Jazz (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Speak that in meta, not in Commons. Taivo (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't aware of what to do with cross-wiki problems. It's been done. Alexis Jazz (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz and W3ird N3rd: Thanks. See also m:SRG#Global_lock_for_User:Toppole69.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps @Ruslik0: could lock this user for cross-wiki vandalism?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Yilmaz seker

  Resolved

Magnus (talk) 16:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done. I warned the user 3 days ago and vandalism has stopped. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Sz pez

  Resolved

Cobblet (talk) 03:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done Account indefinitely blocked, uploads nuked. --jdx Re: 04:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Dan Koehl

  Resolved

Kai3952 (talk) 13:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thats not vandalism nor disruptive. The person thinks that your uploads are fine and do NOT need someone else to review it. It does not add any workload to you. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: Yes, I know. But I do "not" want to accept the permission of autopatrol to edit Wikimedia Commons.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
@Kai3952: , why do you NOT want it? If there is reason, you can email me Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
@Artix Kreiger: My reason is: I have the freedom of choice. Getting the "RESPECT" of others is not a vandalism!--Kai3952 (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not done autopatroll issue should be resolved with me declining the request. Whilst there is no right to cause other editors extra work Kai3952's behaviour clearly indicates that his edits need patrolling. Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


玄史生

  Resolved

Kai3952 (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit #1 in your list was fully correct per our policy Commons:Categories#Over-categorization, as Category:2016 Ching Chuang Kang Air Force Base Open Day is a sub-cat to Category:2016 in Taichung, whereby the less specific cat should be removed. So, your revert of this edit violates OVERCAT-policy. If the other reported edits follow the same pattern, this thread can be closed. --Túrelio (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
身為臺中人,感謝足下對臺中照片的繫年整理。不過地方性活動分類的照片繫年,只要將上位活動子分類直接加上地方繫年分類即可,不必每一張活動照片都加地方繫年分類。--玄史生 (talk) 13:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@玄史生: 因為User:Taivo已經做出裁決,所以我回應你的話轉移到你的討論頁。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
  Not done. All those 64 edits were correct. No action is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

RRRROOAST

  Resolved

theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

USER/IP

  Resolved

Rgn2427250 (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Sure looks like vandalism to me. All four of the OP's edits. NOTHERE.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
I deleted his user page that was advertising some website. Jeff reverted his edits and wrote him a note. The user stopped his behaviour. --Ruthven (msg) 17:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Cesinha Robin

  Pending

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


Markheffron2

  Pending

Ruthven (msg) 16:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

As a first step I've removed the personal attacks and left him an according note. --Túrelio (talk) 17:06, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Mohammedjaseem66

  Resolved

General Ization (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already blocked. Yann (talk) 06:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Kurodita09

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 01:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 06:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Karentalent

  Resolved

RA0808 (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC); edited 18:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done I blocked Karentalent and deleted the upload. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Kanhaiya sao

  Pending

Anna Staveley

  Resolved

INC.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done Yann (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

2A01:E34:ECF0:9360:494:8A41:9E39:3A50

  Resolved

Ariadacapo (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

IP blocked for 1 day and edit hidden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

escorte girl - hot line

  Resolved

some one can see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Kalpanawagle17 --Chatsam (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Re-uploads of earlier deleted spam nuked and user blocked for 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
I reblocked this account indefinitely. This person is obviously not here to contribute to the project. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Category: Fur in art by artist

Please, can somebody help to end our edit war?

See: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kboht&curid=32137291&diff=287320735&oldid=287297601

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kboht

The User:Kboht‎ is not really responsive. Thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked Kboht for a week and reverted a lot of edits. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! -- Kürschner (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

The Real Berean Hunter

  Resolved

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done. Indefinitely blocked. Thank you for posting. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Hafeezullah2k

  Resolved

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done 6 months block. Next time should be indef. Yann (talk) 12:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Kumgam

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 21:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

I am unimpressed by the user's naming and describing capabilities.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Likely a Kumgam-sockpuppet: Tatop u (talk · contribs). --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
@Túrelio: I warned Tatop u for you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Image censorship

Please warn User:Peppa Pig the Second for image censorship, and also please revert File:Rugae vaginales.jpg. 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

  Done. Materialscientist (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
User warned. Please block if vandalism persists. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
  Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


VFD Trooooooolll

  Resolved

Closeapple (talk) 08:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

IPhones-are-for-d!cks

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

@~riley: Thanks, but it's back as IPhones-are-for-c0cks (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
  Done The account is locked and its contributions are reverted. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

미ㄷㅈㅐㅌㅂㅁ

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 01:46, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

pub

some one can see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Sit_and_Pop

bye --Chatsam (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Aim4truth2

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 17:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

175.158.211.0/24

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

@~riley: Thanks, globally blocked for a week.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


175.158.208.0/23

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done /20 blocked, abuse filter being updated. ~riley (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
@~riley and Steinsplitter: Thanks again.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


Manz Oralde Taib

  Resolved

-WayKurat (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

  •   Not done, user has been given a final warning here. If the user continues to upload copyvios, a block is in order. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

USER/IP Avril1975

  Resolved

193.187.3.11 10:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Reasons for reporting: REASON. User Avril1975 only uploaded pornographic and/or nude pictures, showing penetration, usage of penetrative tools, naked selfies, and a naked selfie of a concerningly young girl which must have been obtained via "Sexting". This image was also added to the article on Sexting (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexting)

193.187.3.11 10:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

  Not done. This is not a reason to block him/her. The uploads are in our project scope. Remember: Commons is not censored. Some of his/her uploads from time to time get deleted due to bad quality, but generally – if you do not like his/her uploads, do not look at them. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Shubham7878

  Resolved

Sandstein (talk) 17:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

  Not done. The user has only 2 edits in Commons. You reverted the vandalistic upload and I warned him/her. Let's hope that's enough. If (s)he continues, then (s)he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

72.64.6.55

  Resolved

Ebyabe (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Also these sockpuppets of the same user
2600:1000:b02b:1a6:7cc2:91c2:2182:313 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log,
2600:1000:b01c:e61:6403:215b:13ab:d0af (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
2600:1000:B00F:A0E9:D7B:F6A0:71A5:87A0 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

--Ebyabe (talk) 22:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done range blocked - 1 week. ~riley (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

JimmyBarnes43

  Resolved

JimmyBarnes43 (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done Speedy deleted the image in question. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Ratitaescondida123

  Resolved

IagoQnsi (talk) 05:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done Indef'ed, no useful contributions. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Oshwah

  Resolved
  Done Indef'ed User:Stacy Donalds (vandalism-only account). Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, sweet boomerang.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Special:Contribs/203.92.8.0/21

Long-term soft block, please – the flooder of Philippines again. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done I blocked 203.92.10.0/24 for 6 months. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  Done It continues, so I blocked a larger range. Yann (talk) 11:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Just a note about MRYSOCKER2017 (talk · contribs) – “abusing multiple accounts” is dubious as we cannot remember another account of the vandal. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

No more: MRYSOCKER2018 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. The time for check-user? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  Done We a CU. Yann (talk) 14:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

RoyalYoungWikiWorld

  Resolved

Bidgee (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

and back again RoyalYoungWikiWorld3 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Bidgee (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
and seems they keep throwing the accounts away and create new ones. Latest RoyalYoungWikiWorld4 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Bidgee (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I blocked the remaining accounts I saw and protected the affected user talk pages. Why is talk page vandalism getting so frequent lately? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks @Zhuyifei1999: , first time I seen such disruptive and repetitive vandalism. Bidgee (talk) 09:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
  Done One more blocked. Yann (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

출장마사지

  Resolved

Sixflashphoto (talk) 11:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Hmm, Special:Abusefilter/195 should've been triggered... Hmmmmmm. — regards, Revi 08:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

2A02:1778:113:0:0:0:0:29

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Done, but seems I need to... get a wider range? — regards, Revi 08:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I’d suggest to hard block the IPv6, as well as
as a precaution because of:
$ host 2a02:1778:113::29
9.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3.1.1.0.8.7.7.1.2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer ipv6.s29.hekko.net.pl.
$ host s29.hekko.net.pl
s29.hekko.net.pl has address 185.204.219.172
s29.hekko.net.pl has address 185.204.218.162
s29.hekko.net.pl has address 185.208.164.129
Also, it is IMHO a rare case where block may be used as a punishment—for IP-sock disruption—, and we have not necessarily to investigate which namely registered acc stands behind it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

IP 185.156.173.13

  Resolved

Vandalizing other people user talk page. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done, 3 days. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
A proxy in use by more than one LTA, reported to stewards. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Epicburn321

  Resolved

Ahem... The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done Images speedied as vandalism. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
@Srittau: there is an open DR on those files; I suppose someone should close it?—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, closed. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

85.12.0.0/16

  Pending

2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:1D15:DB40:B5E0:1826 19:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

85.12.76.63 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log was blocked for a year.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
And IMO blocking the IP again now, almost a year after their recent vandalism is pointless. Ankry (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
One may soft-block 85.12.84.243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log for some years following w:Special:Contributions/85.12.84.243, if to block anything. Do not see any reasonable pretext for action against other IPs in the range reported. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
OK, plus please also global block both 85.12.84.243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log and 85.12.76.63 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log because these IP is putting vandalism on many WMF wikis. These gblocks should be soft block. Because of abuse of two IP, global block is needed. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:2418:439E:E62B:DC9 07:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Global blocks are stewards' domain, not Wikimedia Commons admins. Ankry (talk) 08:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Please send these two IPs to m:SRG so stewards can gblock these IPs. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:2418:439E:E62B:DC9 08:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Done at M:SRG#Global block for 89.46.66.0/24.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: how relevant is another range which even does not lie in the same A-class (/8, or 224 addresses) network? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
This is the wrong range. 85.12.84.243 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log and 85.12.76.63 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log should be sent to m:SRG for cross-wiki abuse. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:CA3:AB16:CEF9:FB2A 19:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, you can post there yourself.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
nope, m:SRG semi-protected. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:CA3:AB16:CEF9:FB2A 20:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
You could get an account or post on its talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:46, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Tyg728

  Pending

MNXANL (talk) 14:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

My idea is to make the classification look more clear
translator: Google


Engelbert Scherow

  Pending
Hi Sitacuisses, Could you please fill up a request for a check-user: Commons:Requests for checkuser‎. Thanks, Yann (talk) 04:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Messina. --Sitacuisses (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

162.220.223.50

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SA 13 Bro (talk • contribs) 17:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

  Blocked by Rodhullandemu for 3 days. SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Also globally blocked by a steward for three months. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
And Jdx blocked it for a year. I agree: 3 days was too few. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

M.m.salamat

  Resolved

B dash (talk) 00:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

  Done. This is a copyvio-only user and I blocked him/her for a month. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Boogy72(jazz_pants)

  Not done. Only one deleted upload. I think, that indefinite block in en.wiki is enough, no block in Commons is needed at moment. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay. I was expecting "account only used for vandalism" to be a valid reason for a block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Do not bring problems from other wikis into Commons. But you can bring problems from other wikis into meta and vandalism-only accounts will get easily globally locked there. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: there were precedents of indefinite blocks (by Green Giant in this case) for just one uploaded file user for vandalism abroad. It is not exactly about solving “problems from other wikis”, but about protecting reputation of Wikimedia Commons. When somebody looks at Special:CentralAuth/John_Doe everywhere in Wikimedia (including Meta-wiki) and sees the acc not blocked here, it should be a sort of quality label, namely, that the person behind the account is not a vandal, not a blatant copyvio uploader, the account is not an obvious sock. I would not be happy if Commons’ standing within Wikimedia degraded to one comparable to Spanish Wikipedia. Commons should work hard after the “famous” story of a sockmaster promoted to check-users and one on his puppets to sysops, not to turn blind eye to scum operating from here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
This must be solved case by case. Razgradski uploaded hoax coat of arms for capital city, Boogy72 uploaded hoax (?) high school mascot. By contribution I am not convinced, that this is vandalistic user: maybe the high school really has such mascot? Or at least similar? If Boogy is indefinitely blocked in en.wiki – probably not. But there's a difference between whole country and a high school. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
I'd mostly agree with Taivo. The user I blocked had a more extensive contribution history and was aiming to provoke other users with an incendiary image. This user is more likely to have misunderstood (or ignored) copyright rules and is probably a student playing a prank. Obviously if they extend their activities, then the situation can be reviewed. Green Giant (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Mrsmith14

  Pending

Zaccarias (talk) 16:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


198.91.15.106

  Pending

Stylez995 (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

It is a school IP with long-time disruption in en.Wikipedia. Sysops, please soft-block it for a year as a minimum. Incnis Mrsi (talk)
I've reverted the remaining edits and conventionally 1-day-blocked the IP, before seeing this thread. (No idea how a "softblock" is done.) --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Sincemouhamed741

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 23:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done. After Jeff warned Sincemouhamed, he has stopped vandalism. Only one uploaded copyvio plus two vandalistic edits. If he continues, then he must be blocked. Taivo (talk) 06:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Yuriiop

  Resolved

hiàn 22:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Withdrawn; user was locked. hiàn 23:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Ghostbag

  Resolved

219.78.191.3 10:48, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Citing no evidence.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done. Now evidence is given here and I blocked Ghostbag indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

130.126.255.203

  Resolved

Mobius6 (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Tammy Eliot

@Tammy Eliot: is making a lot of edits to @Rodhullandemu: 's files like [80] - which look fine until you see what they're changing the author to. Needs investigation/a mass-revert... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Mass rolling back with Hoo man's script --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)   Done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)


Standing in the kitchen

  Resolved

Bidgee (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Standing in the kitchen

  Resolved

WFinch (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


SockPuppetry INC. ‎

  Resolved

Bidgee (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Blocked by Jcb.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

AceDouble

  Resolved

Rapsar (talk) 22:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

No action taken, these edits are not vandalism - create DRs as necessary if you believe there are copyright violations. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Alex Tarub

  Resolved

Allurya (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

  Not done Commons is not censored, but we have better images of better dicks. Better to nominate for deletion as lacking educational purpose. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  Comment File DRed as out of scope. User warned about COM:PENIS. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Monkey1123

  Resolved

Vandalizing other people user page. SA 13 Bro (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done, blocked by Taivo, I deleted the uploaded images and created template. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

187.232.13.151

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for 1 month. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@Jon Kolbert: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Frescia Arrangements

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already blocked by Jon Kolbert. Alex Shih (talk) 05:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@Jon Kolbert and Alex Shih: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Mittalwiki

  Resolved

廣九直通車 (talk) 11:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Copyright violations deleted. As far as I can see, there have been no more uploads after the first batch, so let's wait and see. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@廣九直通車: Please see VFC (sorry, no translation in any Chinese language).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Open proxies 4 lyfe

  Resolved

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Buy me a backup Wii-U

  Resolved
Just noting that I'm Azbeztos (Cruizir), not INeverCry. Anyone who claims I'm INeverCry will have Category:Russavia added to them. Buy me a backup Wii-U (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
This proxy is already under a global rangeblock but it's anon only due to some OTRS ticket. Go figure. Buy me a backup Wii-U (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Fine, hardblock it.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done. Locked, indefinitely blocked and tagged as INC. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

112.198.64.0/18

LTA My Royal Young. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked the IP, vandalism is reverted by others. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


Azbeztos H

  Resolved


2402:3A80:9B6:1C6B:0:58:7F41:901

  Resolved
  Done I also semi-protected the talk page. Yann (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Officialandyriversmusic

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 06:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: report accs already indeffed in Wikipedia straightly to stewards next time, rather than to our local operators. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done. Now the account is globally locked. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Shivamsinghsoni7

  Resolved
  Done Indefblocked and files deleted, as this is not an isolated incident of self-promotion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:31, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Alessandrademartino

  Resolved

廣九直通車 (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for 3 days, files deleted/tagged for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

2600:1702:1690:e10::/64

  Resolved
  Done Rangeblocked a day, no talk page access. Guanaco (talk) 05:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: Longer, please.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done Blocked 3 days. Guanaco (talk) 03:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: “Personal attacks and harassment are not allowed. While some harassment is also vandalism…, harassment in itself is not vandalism and should be handled differently.” Watch your block rationales, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
You're right, "intimidation/harassment" fits this better. I've changed the rationale. Guanaco (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Ruiz Cuellar 1

  Resolved

廣九直通車 (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Moreover, his/her recent uploads

(example)tried to fabricate fake public domain files by using Template:PD-old and Template:PD-art indiscriminately, which violates COM:LL and is a act of license laundering.廣九直通車 (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hackexploits

  Resolved

廣九直通車 (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

See also here.Due to the files are advertisment of illegal services, I hereby request an urgent quick deletion of the files.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

SHBS

  Resolved

- Alexis Jazz 11:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Update: socketpuppet Sohila55: File:Behnam Safavi-2.jpg. - Alexis Jazz 11:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
They are either having lunch now or Sohila55 was actually a meatpuppet and they both woke up (Sohila55 possibly talking to SHBS offwiki) when I copied all the warnings from User talk:SHBS to User talk:Sohila55. If the havoc doesn't continue within an hour they maybe don't need an indefblock.. I'm guessing neither understand English by the way. - Alexis Jazz 11:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  Done. I blocked both indefinitely. As the user descended into sockpuppetry, I'll semi-protect the targeted files for a month. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: did you verify them as sockpuppet (and not meatpuppet)? Both have contributed to the same article on fawiki and neither gets reverted over there. Registration dates don't make much sense either. (SHBS 5 months ago, Sohila55 3 months ago and edited on fawiki 3 weeks ago) Even if they are on the same IP, I could imagine them being siblings and one asking the other to overwrite the picture when we keep reverting their overwrite. The other sibling (Sohila55) complies (kind of a meatpuppet in this case), I copy all the warnings from User talk:SHBS to User talk:Sohila55, Sohila55 starts yelling at their sibling and both cease overwriting the files. I don't know if that is what has actually happened, but it seems plausible and I think we have to assume good faith in the end. Sohila55 overwrote both pictures concerned only once, after I copied the load of warnings to their talk page the overwrites completely stopped from both accounts.
If we assume it was meatpuppetry, I think SHBS should get a shorter term ban (probably did not read or understand the warnings given) and Sohila55 no ban as they ceased right after the first warning. - Alexis Jazz 16:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I am not checkuser, so I cannot confirm sockpuppetry. I acted only by contributions. Neither of them has now edits in Commons. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: even if you were checkuser you couldn't confirm them as sockpuppets because finding two siblings on one IP would not be uncommon. I initially also thought "sock" based on their actions on Commons, but when I looked at fawiki and the overwrites as it turned out really did stop after warning Sohila55 just once I started thinking it could have been a meatpuppet action. Should I inquire about this at COM:AN? - Alexis Jazz 17:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I understand. Copying the warnings was not a very good idea, because timestamps were wrong. I thought, that at time of uploading last copyvios Sohila had 3 warnings, while actually (s)he had none (all warnings came later). Under such circumstances I'll unblock Sohila. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. If the ban for SHBS stands, could you also add a template User talk:SHBS to inform them it's possible to request being unblocked? Without hard proof for socking, I imagine SHBS could be unblocked if they apologize and familiarize themself with the rules. I think I have seen such a template before but I simply don't know the name of that template. (it's also possible I saw it on enwiki so maybe we don't have it) - Alexis Jazz 18:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

bsrppp

  Resolved

GermanJoe (talk) 17:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done. I deleted the file and blocked the user indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

74.195.76.60

  Resolved
  Done. Blocked. -- Geagea (talk) 01:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Sivakrishna149

  Resolved
  Done I blocked the 2 newest accounts. No useful contributions, obvious socks. Yann (talk) 13:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

126.74.99.37

  Pending

アルトクール (talk) 16:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

  Done. Blocked 3 days, image deleted. Guanaco (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Undetected sleeper

  Resolved

109.157.143.45

  Resolved
  Done Yann (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

193.0.219.47

  Done Yann (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

2606:A000:6604:D700:CCA7:80C:ADF4:2D50

  Resolved
  Done. I blocked 2 IP-s for a week and reverted the vandalism. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

188.64.206.7

  Resolved

Guycn2 · 10:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done by User:Geagea, Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Guycn2 · 12:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

MazzyBor

  Resolved

The so called User:MazzyBor keeps uploading mostly Serbian and Yugoslavian flags in a never adopted darker color shade (see file history) or putting colors from the socialist period on the +40 older monarch version (see file history). Recently he started rewriting history (see file history) and spreading Serbian irredentism by overwriting a correct map, claiming former Byzantine lands/almost the entire Balkans were Serbia in the year 1358 and Austria beeing a part of Germany (which was not even unified in that time), he also made countries like the "Republic of Ragusa" totally disappear and created new like "Thrace" - which was a part of the by Ottomans occupied Byzantine Empire. (No sources were even added on this edit; I have reverted it to the correct version)

I just wanted to report this, and I hope someone will have time to check this out.

Best regards, MateoKatanaCRO (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

  Not done Let's discuss this over on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

I Hate IloveRumania

  Resolved

User:Gabomirandaperez123456

廣九直通車 (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 11:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

46.39.50.244

-- Tuválkin 16:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  •   Done: 2018-05-06T17:22:30 Ankry (A) (talk | contribs) blocked 46.39.50.244 (talk) with an expiration time of 1 week (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Intimidation/harassment) Thanks! -- Tuválkin 23:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

CB1000

Pit rock (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done. I upload-protected the file for a year and blocked one sockpuppet indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Wojciech Cejrowski 2011.jpg repeated vandalism

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done. One month block (sockpuppet indefinitely). Taivo (talk) 08:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Mohamedvolt

User warned. Please re-comment or ping me if disruption continues. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: as Incnis Mrsi told me on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 10#Officialandyriversmusic: "report accs already indeffed in Wikipedia straightly to stewards next time, rather than to our local operators." Although this user wasn't indefblocked on Mediawiki (blocked for 2 weeks), when they continue the exact same vandalism here while still blocked on Mediawiki is enough of a red flag for me.. - Alexis Jazz 04:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: Ok, I was waiting for a second block before reporting to the Stewards.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Jon Kolbert just might have given him that if he had known the crap here is just a continuation of the crap that got him blocked on Mediawiki. - Alexis Jazz 04:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
The policy based norm is that stewards may accept requests for global blocks once the minimum of blocks on two projects has been reached. There remain good reasons for COM:BP to be interpreted for block length, solely on the evidence presented on this project. -- (talk) 04:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

John wick7841

Drmies (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

  Comment Doesn't seem like a valid reason to block the user here. File:Pecs.jpg may actually be in scope as an image of crossdressing. - Alexis Jazz 19:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
  Done, uploads nuked, user blocked. Vandalism, possibly harassment. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
@Srittau: As I explained at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pecs.jpg I can understand the deletion to protect the people in the photos but doubt it's any serious kind of harassment. Also John wick7841 hasn't vandalized Commons. He uploaded one personal image that would be deleted because it was out of scope, one image in the category Category:Men wearing bras and one that would fit in the category Category:Males in female clothing (we don't seem to have Men wearing dresses?). I admit: I have my reservations about John wick7841 becoming a productive member of this community. (but I wouldn't rule it out entirely) But in general users don't get blocked here because they vandalized enwiki. Also, you have given him no explanation of any kind on his talk page as to why he was blocked or even the fact he has been blocked. - Alexis Jazz 01:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Users get blocked all the time if all they do is vandalize sister wikis. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Srittau: I have seen users get globally blocked for crosswiki vandalism, but that's not the case here. If the vandalism on enwiki was something extremely disruptive (like racist crap or something) that may also be enough to warrant a global block. Also not the case. I already said I have reservations about this user becoming a productive member of this community, so even though I don't fully agree there isn't too much of a point in actually trying to get that block undone.
But could you at least put the usual notice on their talk page that tells them they were blocked and why? The "why" in this case would be "vandalism on enwiki", which as I've said I don't think is usually enough to block a user here, but if you want to stick with the block I'll accept it if you provide that as the reason on his talk page. - Alexis Jazz 02:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  Info: the account has been globally locked.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Odysseus1479: I see. Although he used at least one of the photos he uploaded for vandalism on enwiki, I disagree he vandalized Commons. The photos he uploaded could be used for other things. He didn't mess up anything here, didn't upload any copyvios we are aware of, uploaded only one photo that was quite clearly going to be an unused personal photo without COM:EDUSE and he had chosen poor filenames. But none of those things are breaking any rules. I can understand we deleted the other two photos as well for personality reasons but mostly out of courtesy. John wick7841 was goofing around, vandalized enwiki and once more: I do have my reservations he would become a productive member of this community anytime soon. But I don't think he vandalized Commons. - Alexis Jazz 04:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Uploading files for the purpose of vandalizing other wikis is and always has been considered vandalism on Commons. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Thomas Aoibhneas

Bksgs

- Alexis Jazz 18:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll withdraw this for now, they have been quiet for now so I just put the test template on their talk page. The Oreo overwrite seems to have not been vandalism in hindsight, the other two may have been just test edits. - Alexis Jazz 12:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The Ringits

Syujhtrrdy

clpo13(talk) 21:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done vandalism-only account Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Musicsliveme

134.223.230.151 18:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

2001:b400:e282:6ca9:7c39:1654:f03:9cd3

B dash (talk) 07:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

LammyTrammy

Oleg3280 (talk) 12:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  Done, locally blocked by -revi, globally banned by Alaa. Marshmallych 14:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)