Commons:Deletion requests/Louvre-Lens

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Louvre-Lens|year=2024|month=November|day=07}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Louvre-Lens|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Louvre-Lens}} at the end of today's log.

Louvre-Lens

edit

Although I believe most of the works are likely in PD, all have self published cc licensing tags. All these are photographic reproductions of 2D work or of 3D work. All require both work details pertaining to lifespan of the artist and the applicable licensing tags for the work of art. I assume most are a mix of PD-100 or PD-old-assumed but given the lack of information It's not clear. Works are a mix of 2D and 3D.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added my remarks on file 4 and 5 - copies made by unknown artists of lost originals by Polycles the elder
For my part, you can add public domain at the files I upload and that are listed here. More informations about pictures on the article L'Europe de Rubens. I don't have the time to add these informations from Wikipédia to Commons in this moment. I hope a day a system will be developped with Wikidata. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-old. Ruthven (msg) 06:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]