Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Latuff nazi camp 2.png

File:Latuff nazi camp 2.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2009 at 20:38:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by en:Carlos Latuff - gif version uploaded by Pieter Kuiper, converted to png and uploaded by Liftarn, - nominated by Pieter Kuiper -- Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of Latuff's more accomplished cartoons, awarded 2nd prize at an international contest, notable in its own right as the subject of controversy. -- Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: no problem with it being on the featured list, but I think we should generally not feature current propaganda images on the front page. - Jmabel ! talk 04:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh? Propaganda? :o Diti the penguin — 07:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hanay (talk) 06:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Diti the penguin — 07:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very neat illustration, I which I had this level! Diti the penguin — 07:19, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ranbar (talk) 07:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please state a reason for opposing as a courtesy to the nominator. -- JovanCormac 07:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the illustration is neither "notable in its own right", nor "of high artistic merit", "of high historic merit" or "of high illustrative merit" (see "Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents" under "Commons:Featured picture candidates->Formal things"). --Kjetil_r 07:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very politically incorrect (and wrong, but that's an opinion). Tomer A. 07:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality scan of a very interesting and controversially famous cartoon. -- JovanCormac 07:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insulting the memory of the 6 million murdered in the Holocaust will cause a lot of damage to this project. It is enough that this garbage is in commons, but to put in the main page? How dare you? Unfortunately I can'y say that I'm surprised considering the nominator. Indeed, it is a very sad day for commons. Kooritza (talk) 08:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Yoavd (talk) 08:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --רוליג (talk) 08:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why? Let me tell you why, because that image is not only propaganda, it is propoganda of hate, but yet it is not even added to category "propaganda". Why it is propaganda? There's absolutely nothing that let one to compare the wire of the concentration camps of The Holocaust and West Bank security fence. The former was built to prevent innocent victims from getting out, the latter was built to prevent terrorists from entering in. that cartoon is highly offencive to many people, who lost relatives in the w:The_Holocaust, who are w:The Holocaust survivors.Could you imagine featuring Muhammad cartoons? Why that man in cartoon is crying? He probably cries because he just lost a son, who committed homicide bombing inside Israel. One of the biggest reasons for nominating that was retaliation to me personally. And besides technical quality of that is absolutely horrible. What in the world is sticking out of the man mouth (white from one side, and red from the other)? BTW no normal cartoonist and/or painter will paint his name in the very midlle of his work--Mbz1 (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - against politicization of the commons. Deror avi (talk) 09:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Mila and Kooritza. And per myself, because myself feels personally insulted by what this drawing claims to represent. Wolf (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Polemic, I liked!--Econt (talk) 09:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This picture shouldn't get nominated here. This topic is far too controversial. Religious conflicts will never get solved and mostly (like in this conflict too) both sides act inhuman. "Imagine there's no countries - It isn't hard to do. Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too" - John Lennon Imagine --AngMoKio (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should have never been nominated here, but I do not agree that conflict is "religious". It is not about religion for Jews, it is about surviving. And besides look at the other parts of the world. Don't you see what's going on around? If we do not stop terrorism now, in few years, we well end up building security fences around our own countries to prevent terrorists from killing our own kids.--Mbz1 (talk) 10:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - propaganda or not, somehow I quite doubt if it follows the quality guidelines. As for the propaganda... gee... as far as I know, the Hamas rules in Gaza strip, and if there are still refugee camps there, it's because they serve their intentions... --Yuval Y § Chat § 10:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose גוונא (talk) 10:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you are really sure that you are not a socket puppet? --AngMoKio (talk) 10:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what about you? Kooritza (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are funny. I have more than just 2 edits on this nomination. Furthermore i was not talking about you. --AngMoKio (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

גוונא is not a sock, but has many contributions on hewp; probably there was some canvassing. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Issue solved then. --AngMoKio (talk) 10:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this should be announced on arwp and fawp for balance? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the cartoon is even more offencive because quite a few prominent Palestinians helped nazi to prosecute the Jews during the war--Mbz1 (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is unbelievable. per Kooritza and Tomer A. Ravit (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, this propaganda is outside of commons' scope, promoting it shows very poor judgement. Odedee (talk) 10:48, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 5 support, 14 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. SNOW closure, no realistic chance of being featured. Nomination very questionable in the context of Pieter Kuiper's other recent edits. Adambro (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]