Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 24 2023

Consensual review

edit

File:20210425_Apis_mellifera_02.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Bees at the entrance of their hive in the Deutsch-Französischer Garten --FlocciNivis 19:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose the bee in the foreground --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The out of focus bee in the foreground is quite distracting. --C messier 20:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Monkeys_of_The_Sundarbans_13.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Rhesus Monkey --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
      Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
      Oppose cropped fingers --Charlesjsharp 16:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: Besides does it looks blurry? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp enough/too noisy for QI. I know that's a tough standard. -- Ikan Kekek 22:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: Worked a bit on it. Is it ok now? Also, their fur looks blurry in the original. If this version doesn't work out, and also if you want I can give you the main pic so you can help me with the edit.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • The animal's fur isn't inherently blurry. It's hard to take sharp wildlife photos. Charles may have some advice for you. -- Ikan Kekek 17:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Шманьківці,_Нічлава,_Фоторобота_Максима_Огородника_«Паморозь_у_верболозах».jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Winter river--Максим Огородник 15:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment Quite prominent green and purple CAs. A geolocation would be welcomed too. --C messier 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 05:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The prominent CAs have not been fixed. --C messier 20:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Messier, also there's much grain --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Partido_Radical_de_Chile.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Radical Party of Chile. --Rjcastillo 02:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Overprocessed sky creates a very strong halo. --Gyrostat 18:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Gyrostat --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Gyrostat. BigDom 11:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. On top of that, some parts on top of the roof have taken on the color of the blue sky. Very strange. --Smial 12:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as above --Sandro Halank 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per above, clearly visible at thumbnail size --Poco a poco 16:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

*   Oppose I have to agree. -- Ikan Kekek 05:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

  •   Oppose per others --Milseburg 11:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment Looking at the blue fading into the building, it seems that the sky doesn't belong to the original shot. I'd suggest to restore the original one, as the overall quality of the rest of the picture is good. --Lion-hearted85 13:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   New version-Thanks for the review and suggestions. It was my mistake.I had lost the original file. --Rjcastillo (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
    @Rjcastillo: It's pretty much better now, I'm happy to   Support.But I think it will be difficult to overturn all of these votes in a short period. I would rather suggest you nominate it again.--Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Comment I wouldn't overturn my vote, the sky is washed out now. Was it a fake sky in the first version? that would be a bold nom for QI --Poco a poco 15:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality to me: the sky often looks just like that. But this issue should be addressed. -- Ikan Kekek 17:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 10:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)