User talk:Pudelek/Archive2

image details query

Using an image here: http://kidimg.com/#57

can you verisfy the stained glass came from St. Barbara Church, if not, can you suggest corrections? dugan -at- bio contact . org

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm a little sad that the EXIF data is missing, and I'd like some more information on the panorama (e.g. how many shots, what software used to perform stitching), but it's a technically solid shot of a beautiful subject. I see no stitching errors or exposure inconsistencies, and the subject is well-lit and acceptably focused. Just out of curiosity, is File:Moravskoslezské Beskydy.jpg a crop of this image? --Jonny-mt 16:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Comment - no, this [[1]] is another image --Pudelek 17:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlkolínec - houses.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skipark Ružomberok - bufet Daria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Passes for me. Lycaon 08:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

POTY

Nie widzę (nie mogę znaleźć) żadnego Twojego zdjęcia. Czyżby nie było? Jeżli jest to, w której galerii? Albertus teolog (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Pozdr ;-) Albertus teolog (talk) 20:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MFK Ružomberok stadium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks ok to me. Added a link in the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 08:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Liptovský Mikuláš.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why is this synagogue worth a scope? --Eusebius (talk) 10:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

   Question Because it has a own article at the polish Wikipedia? ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's only one photo of this synagogue. This synagogue is renovated and this is now museum, popular place in Liptov region --Pudelek (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I hadn't seen the (recent) article. The "usedin" field can be useful... --Eusebius (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 07:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church St Francis Xavier - Banská Bystrica (Besztercebánya).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details, nice atmosphere --Mbdortmund 19:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svätý Kríž - wooden gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK (could use less DOF though imo). --Coyau 11:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artikulárny kostol - Svätý Kríž.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Coyau 15:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Cities in Silesia‎

Hej,

rozumiem o co chodziło z tą kategorią. Problem jest tylko taki, że jeśli takowa istnieje dla Śląska, to musiałaby też na Kujaw, Małopolski, Podlasia itd. A z tego nie wyjdziemy nigdy. Często te regiony nie mają ściśle określonych granic. Nie robiłbym tutaj wyjątku dla Śląska. Co więcej nie podoba mi się podwójna kategoryzacja miast wg województw i regionów. Jedna starczy. Zresztą analogiczna kategoria jest na Wikipedii. Natomiast oczywiście może istnieć galeria Cities in Silesia, bo galerie i tak i tak muszą zawierać POVowy wybór. Pozdrawiam Sfu (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

No sam jednak piszesz, że są różne podziały, więc miejsce na POV jest. Argument o międzypaństwości Śląska jest kiepski. Nie powinno się liczyć, co chcemy pokazać i z jakimi legendami walczyć. Powinien się liczyć stan faktyczny. A faktem jest, że podział wg nich może być dyskusyjny. Druga kwestia to to, że nie można robić wyjątków dla pewnych regionów. Co np. z miejscowościami na wschodzie polski? Czy to zaliczać np. Zamość do Lubelszczyzny czy historycznie do Rusi. Co do walki z utożsamianiem Śląska z województwem (walki o prawdę) to Wikipedia służy o niebo lepiej. Kategorie na Commons mają logicznie grupować zdjęcia, tak aby łatwo było do nich dotrzeć ludziom piszącym artykuły. Łatwo jest sprawdzić w jakiej gminie leży dana wieś, ale w regionie — często nie da się tego określić. Obawiam się, ze takie kategorie wprowadzą więcej zamieszania. I tak brak ludzi do porządkowania tych wg województw. Podsumowując, ze względu na brak ściśle określonych granic wielu regionów i inny cel Commons niż Wikipedii jestem przeciw, bez wyjątków. Sfu (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Aha, dlaczego nie galeria? Myślę, że to dobry pomysł, można do niej podlinkować w wiki. Kategorie o regionach powinny raczej zawierać mapy, zdjęcia strojów, jakiś zwyczajów, potraw itp. Sfu (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Ma związek. Jeśli z takich powodów nie możemy utrzymywać kategorii dla np. Mazur, Rusi, czy Podlasia, to nie może istnieć sytuacja w której taka kategoria jest dla Śląska a dla jakiegoś ważnego regionu nie. To co mówisz dalej to prawda, ale na Wikipedii. Nie ma sensu wprowadzać drugiej kategoryzacji o niepewnych kryteriach, kiedy nie ma komu pracować nad podstawową. Celem commons nie jest uświadamianie ludzi, ale umożliwienie im łatwego znalezienia obrazka. Galeria o Śląsku to umożliwi, kategoria nigdy nie będzie kompletna, mogą być o nią boje. Nieakceptowalny jest fakt, że analogicznych może nie być dla innych regionów. Sfu (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Zależy w taki sposób, że sytuacja w której istnieje rozbudowana kategoria o Śląsku, a o innych regionach nie jest kuriozalna (kategoryzować powinniśmy wszystko, więc każda wioska powinna znaleźć się w odpowiedniej kategorii regionu). I nie chodzi tu tylko o chęci, ale też o określenie granic. Oczywiście, że nie kategoria będzie dokończona, przecież kategoriom o województwach daleko do tego. Co więcej jeśli miasta to czemu nie wsie, jeśli pałace to czemu nie kościoły — pracy od groma, tylko dla udowodnienia, że taki region istnieje. A wystarczyłaby galeryjka i nie ma tu problemu z koniecznością wrzucania wszystkiego z danego regionu. Ale nie będę się upierał. Jednak uważam, że commons to kiepskie miejsce na promocję śląskości. BTW zarchiwizuj dyskusję, u mnie strona wczytuje się kilka sekund, a każdy nowy wpis kosztuje już 85kb miejsca na serwerach (choć go teraz nie oszczędzamy ;). Sfu (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Mimo wszytko wolałbym, żeby poświęcić tą energię w lepsze kategoryzowanie wg województw, powiatów i gmin, a tych ostatnich to nie mamy póki co nawet połowy. Nierówne rozwinięcie opisów regionów świadczy to raczej przywiązaniu mieszkańców do regionu i świadomości jego istnienia. Sfu (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock tower in Banská Bystrica (Besztercebánya).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments right side of the tower slightly tilted to the left --Mbdortmund 19:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Comment tower is tilted --Pudelek 20:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC) found it in the article --Mbdortmund 00:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veľká Fatra - panorama-czysta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Levoča.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can you please add geo-coordinates to the image description. -Richard (talk)19:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Comment eee... geo-coordinates are under description --Pudelek (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Uups, sorry. -Richard (talk)20:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Scope is fairly appropriate because of the church with the carvings by Paul of Levoča.
•  Support ok for me-Richard (talk)21:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in Żywiec Beskids-2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, no noise, virtually no CA, and you did not oversaturate the colors of the house. --Notyourbroom 17:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TV station on Chopok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - skilift on Chopok.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gas station in Turčianske Teplice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brillant. Fingalo 20:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staré Hory - cesta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schöne Komposition. Fingalo 20:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stained glass - Kutna Hora.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stained glass - Kutna Hora.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oppeln by night1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oppeln by night1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopok TV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting --High Contrast 19:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lowoschau - Kirche.jpg

Witaj!

Jeśli uważasz, że źle nazwana jest któraś z załadowanych przez Ciebie grafik, załaduj ją ponownie pod prawidłowym tytułem. Potem otwórz edytuj w nieprawidłowej, skasuj w niej cały tekst i dodaj szablon {{badname|prawidłowo nazwana wersja.jpg}}. Chyba zawsze używasz jpg. To często wykorzystywany szablon, więc może minąć nawet kilka dni, nim administrator skasuje. Ale jeśli usuniesz cały tekst, oprócz badname nie będzie przeszkadzać w żadnej kategorii. Będzie w ukrytej, do której umieszczane są duplikaty do sprawdzenia czy wszystko gra. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chudów castle in March.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Technically good, interesting subject, big resolution. Please geocode --Siipikarja 19:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)  Info +location :) --Pudelek 09:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ski lift on Chopok (white-black).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and very interesting Albertus teolog 14:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)  Request Please geocode --Siipikarja 20:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC).  Info done --Pudelek 09:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oder in Deschowitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok.Pro2 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chudów castle and wooden wall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here.Pro2 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chudów castle in March1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Technically good, interesting subject, big resolution. Does it only look, or is the subject slightly tilted counter-clockwise? If so, could you please fix it. Please geocode. Good work Pudelek. --Siipikarja 19:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)  Info new version and location :) --Pudelek 09:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Seems like you lost some of the sharpness in the rotation process. The original is sharper. Thanks for the coordinates. --Siipikarja 21:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Upss... 3rd version - I think now sharpness is OK --Pudelek 09:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)  Support Approved. --Siipikarja 01:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

*

Dear Marcin Szala, We'd like to use the picture of stained glass with St. Francis in our catechetical book for children to be published in Sweden August. If you mail me at -myname- + @ gmail.com then, I can send you a copy, when its printed! Best regards,

marcelinogauguin

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krnov - synagogue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quality image --Ianare 04:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Liptov in winter1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is better but the town is cut-off --Ianare 05:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Liptov in winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight overexposure but nice composition --Ianare 05:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruntál (Freudenthal) - market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Yann 08:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krnov castle - entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Krnov (Jägerndorf).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 23:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Krnov.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 CommentPerhaps the scope should be changed to "Synagogue, Krnov (exterior)" --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment I don't now... on the commons are the only pictures from outside the synagogue --Pudelek (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old bridge in Krnov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little noisy but OK --Ianare 15:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone sculpture in St. Annaberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Here I like this light (Is it called 'harsh' in english?) --Berthold Werner 16:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture in Jeschona.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 10:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruntál - house on market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details on the houses but, therefore IMHO QI inspite of the camera-problems with the statue. --Mbdortmund 12:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cvilin - Křížová cesta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 11:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krnov - St. Martin church and market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a tad sharper and a smitten larger, but OK for me. Lycaon 22:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CoA - Bruntal Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine for me. --Eusebius 07:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt in der Stadt Freudenthal, Tschechisch Schlesien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 02:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opolska Wenecja1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitätskirche in Troppau - innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done, especially considering that the lighting conditions were not ideal. Maedin 16:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)  Comment This would be better in a portrait. Yann 19:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spring - statue in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, quality image. --Romanceor 12:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Summer - statue in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition (camera is great idea), quality image. --Romanceor 12:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall tower in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Berthold Werner 15:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Oppeln, market square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Tasto 19:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus Christi Church in Rosenberg - side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. Yann 14:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruntál.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Alternative scope - Market square in Bruntál

•  Support It is certainly the best image from the town. I have considered the town vs. market place subscope dilemma. An alternative manner to present a town could be as an aerial shot or from a high viewpoint, but I also think such a central and characteristic location is OK. The image is probably not entirely representative of how buildings look like in general in Bruntál, as it is probably more pitoresque in this photo, than what you would see on any street corner. On the other hand the market square is probably the feature of the town which makes it distinct from other towns in the area. I therefore think the town scope is OK, and I would also have been reluctant to support a market square subscope as I think it would be too narrow to be of sufficient interest for WMF projects. --Slaunger (talk) 10:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I've added an approximate (western) heading to your geotag. It gives this nice arrow on the Commons icon shows in GM and GE, when you click the link. You may want to adjust it to a more precise value. I recommend using the heading parameters in these types of photos - adds value. --Slaunger (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Slaunger (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Jasná Ski Resort - skilift on Chopok.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jasná Ski Resort - skilift on Chopok.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotschanowitz (Kiefernrode, Chocianowice) - main altar in new church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good frontal composition and colours --George Chernilevsky 17:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Consulate of Germany in Opole (Oppeln).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Informative subject, no significant technical weaknesses. --Iotatau 10:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kudoba - Kirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With some reservation I promote this image. The framing is tight and the parking car is a pity. But it's a nice building. Lighting and exposure are good. --Iotatau 21:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnen in Rosenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 06:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opole - most kolejowy na Odrą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good infrastructure panorama. --Iotatau 13:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Śnieżnik Mountains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --George Chernilevsky 07:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

User categories

Dzień dobry Marcin. Could you add user categories to your files as here please? Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 09:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Hehe. Take your time, I'll help if I can. Lycaon (talk) 11:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenberg - Way of the Cross near St. Anna church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Maedin 19:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cows in mountain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Ianare 00:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Minor opinion

Hi Marcin, you have many attractive subjects among the QI nominations but I find a lot of them too dark. Check out "Liechtensteinschutzhaus elephant", for instance. If I have a look at the histogram the right quarter is hardly used. Here is a modified version with shadows lifted by 30% in Photoshop. Hope you don't mind. Best regards Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "Pod Śnieżnikiem" mountain hostel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Do you know the location? Then you can add it to the summary. If you ever nominate a valued image candidate you'll need it anyway :) --Iotatau 19:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)  Comment - geolocoation :) -Pudelek 23:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Thanks, great! --Iotatau 23:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liechtensteinschutzhaus - elephant.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An elephant at an unusual place. --Iotatau 17:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glatzer Schneeberg - panorama from mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Iotatau 11:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pramen Moravy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sign a bit overexposed but OK --Ianare 08:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opole (Oppeln) - old city.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice city detail. Here the exposure is very good. --Iotatau 22:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Art Nouveau building in Gleiwitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could benefit from a brightening. --Iotatau 22:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Now I like it. --Iotatau 10:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Zdjęcia

Witam! Prosiłeś o mesejdża, więc oto i on :)

Pozwoliłem sobie wykorzystać niektóre z Twoich zdjęć zamieszczonych na Wiki Commons na portalu www.gorny-slask.eu, portalu który z założenia jest wirtualnym albumem zdjęć i fotografii obrazujących urbanistykę, architekturę i infrastrukturę Górnego Śląska, a także zbiorem map i rysunków kartograficznych oraz innych materiałów historycznych przedstawiających woj. śląskie.

Celem strony jest zobrazowanie i opisanie przemian przestrzennych, urbanistycznych i architektonicznych w danym regionie poprzez prezentację fotografii historycznych, map i rysunków kartograficznych, jak również udokumentowanie stanu obecnego infrastruktury i innych przedmiotów kultury materialnej poprzez prezentację zdjęć współczesnych oraz zilustrowanie i opisanie historii materialnej regionu (np. różnego rodzaju wydarzenia historyczne).

Pozdrawiam i miłego dnia życzę :)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krúpova hoľa - information table.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, useful --Ianare 03:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Tatras - view from Ďumbier.jpg

Hi, Marcin!

The result of editing not absolutely good: CA remains. Whether give You to me the permission to edit this photo?

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done

I use first version of file and corrected CA on shnow edges. EXIF are saved in new file.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nízke Tatry - Ďumbier cirque1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 20:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nízke Tatry - dark time.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Low Tatras - view from Ďumbier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Request corrections need - CA on shnow edges left and right bottom --George Chernilevsky 08:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)  Info new version --Pudelek 10:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)  Support Now ok. QI for me --George Chernilevsky 19:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamenná chata 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- H005 15:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizke tatry - panorama from Krúpova hoľa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- H005 15:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solaris Center - roof1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamenná chata - outhouse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesujący widoczek --Sfu 21:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for permission to use your beautiful "Sunflower from Silesia." I am creating a video on the "Se Livrer" meditation of Saint Therese Couderc. Your sunflower fits perfectly with the passage where she speaks of being "no longer concerned with self except to keep it continually turned toward God." Of course, I am properly attributing the photograph to you in the credits. User:Faylei

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Low Tatras - blue trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Maedin 09:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica - neo-renaissance building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Jcart1534 22:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopok and Kamenná chata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. -Jcart1534 02:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica synagogue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -Jcart1534 00:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica (Banská Štiavnica (Schemnitz, Selmecbánya) - old synagogue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -Jcart1534 00:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Your photocamera

Hi, Marcin!

You nominate very nice composition for QI. But white balance not well for me (very blue). Please, check Your camera.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I can see some blue in old nominations (Tatras Mountain) and now in this:

• File:Banská Štiavnica (Selmecbánya, Schemniz) - town hall.jpg
• File:Banská Štiavnica - old bulding in center.jpg

I verify white balance on two separate monitors. I like Your creativity, and think, than is possibly manual white balance problem.

With best regards, George.

George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

New version has far better colour balance, but bit overcontrasted. Try first bit decreate contrast, then correct blue.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica - Nový zámok1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might have been a tad sharper, but still QI. Lycaon 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica (Selmecbánya, Schemniz) - town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good work! -George Chernilevsky 06:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrej Kmeť statue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Maedin 10:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Pudelek!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 23:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Smizany erb.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Rusovce erb.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Spišský Štvrtok - erb.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Veľký Slavkov - erb.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Podbiel-Erb.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment If "Biserica Patriarhiei" = "Catedrala Patriarhală" = "Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral", you could add a link in the scope to the Commons category. --Myrabella (talk) 22:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banská Štiavnica - old bulding in center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentI think it would have looked batter if dark parts of the building on the right where croped --Sfu 12:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Info new version --Pudelek 09:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC) ok --Sfu 13:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - the Plague Column (part).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Cayambe 06:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Low Tatras in Juni - view from Donovaly2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, despite the lack of sharpness on the mountains (and not tilted anymore :-) -- H005 22:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Low Tatras in Juni - view from Donovaly1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, despite the lack of sharpness on the mountains (and not tilted anymore :-) -- H005 22:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - Mestský hrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice picture. Very usable, good quality. Note: Geocoding would be appreciated! --NormanB 22:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremnica - The Plague Column.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment Geocoding would be appreciated! --NormanB 22:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - Plague Column (part2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, as the next one. --Cayambe 10:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ružomberok - Hrabovo pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- H005 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow is not ideal, but with overall quality it's acceptable. -- H005 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ružomberok - Hrabovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although sharpness is just borderline -- H005 21:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 12:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty sharp, and nice composition as well. -- JovanCormac 15:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

permission for your photo

Hi i was just messaging you to tell you that im using your photo for a computer project. thanks.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support -- H005 16:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI IMO. --Cayambe 13:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good in my opinion. --Cayambe 15:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good IMO. --Cayambe 15:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 14- shrine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. -- Sfu 14:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, good --George Chernilevsky 19:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Múzeum slovenskej dediny 12 - church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture is well made. The light conditions have produced very hard contrast also here. But the important parts of the building are visible and not lost in the dark as is the case with the other picture of the same church. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strečno - viem from castle1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 22:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strečno - pano from castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very minor Stitching error in the tallest peak. It's not easily noticeable, but it should be easy to fix. --Relic38 02:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment hmm... on a single image this peak look the same. Probably this is not stitching error --Pudelek 11:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC) OK, I believe you. Promoted --Relic38 12:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žilina (Zsolna) - Kostol Najsvätejšej Trojice a Burianova veža.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light conditions were not perfect, but good enough here. I cannot see anything that speaks against QI. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinaia Monastery, The Great Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Pudelek (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Strečno - window2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather tight crop to the left, but on the other hand an interesting capture of the shadows. -- H005 20:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Strečno - window1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- H005 20:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žilina - fontain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good IMO. --Cayambe 14:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debrecen - Protestant Great Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --Cayambe 07:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žilina (Zsolna) - Mariánske námestie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The awning seems to have blotchy pixellized colour patches. Can this be fixed? --99of9 00:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Comment Hmm... In my opinion is OK --Pudelek 10:08, 2 October 2009 (UTC) CommentIt's not there when I look again, must have been some weird glitch on my comp. Recommending promotion - I love the clouds as well as the buildings. --99of9 14:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strečno castle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK - could you add a geocode, please? -- H005 09:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debrecen - Protestant Great Church1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 20:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debrecen - park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, except for the street lamp above the head of the statue. --Cayambe 10:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protestant Great Church of Debrecen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  request Could you please link the scope as to make the reviewing process easier? Lycaon (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

 Answer done :) --Pudelek (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Best image in its category (where there are some funny pictures), all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 21:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oradea (Nagyvárad) - piaţa Unirii 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks much more appealing than Piaţa Unirii in Bucureşti. :-) But can you please add a geocode to all three images? -- H005 20:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oradea (Nagyvárad) - piaţa Unirii.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Cayambe 16:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debrecen - McDonald's.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oradea-Nagyvárad - Crişul Repede and synagogue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, though a bit dark IMO. --Cayambe 09:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debrecen - csonka templom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Cayambe 13:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oradea-Nagyvárad - statue of Ladislaus I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica Colţea - fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good. --Cayambe 12:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulevardul Unirii - fountain2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulevardul Unirii - fountain1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Makes this ugly place almost look beautiful. :-) -- H005 21:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rusovce erb.gif

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rusovce erb.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rusovce erb.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

 Mercy (☎|✍) 21:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - old city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:32, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building in Bucharest - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:32, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Images von Braşov

Hallo Pudelek, Ich habe gesehen daß Du eine Reihe Bilder von Braşov (Kronstadt) ins Deutsche „Kronstadt“ umbenannt hast, was eigentlich nicht korrekt ist. Da sich diese Stadt in Rumänien befindet sollte sie hauptsächlich mit der Landessprache (rumänisch) benannt werden, Kronstadt in Klammer (...). Sorry ich kann kein polnisch und auch kein schlesisch. Grüße, --L.Kenzel (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Pudelek, danke für Deine Antworten. Daß in Brasov (Kronstadt) auch Deutsche noch leben ist mir bekannt, aber wegen der Benennung, siehe hier. Grüße, --L.Kenzel 19:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Curtea Veche in Bucharest 2009.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curtea Veche in Bucharest 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. Cayambe 07:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Arcul de Triumf 2009-7.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcul de Triumf 2009-7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough IMO. --Cayambe 08:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Arcul de Triumf 2009.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcul de Triumf 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness not the greatest, but OK. -- H005 20:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

File:2 x M in Bucharest.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 x M in Bucharest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment No geocode, not even street names or the building's name. Looks like Unirea Shopping centre, or am I wrong? At least this fact should be documented. -- H005 21:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)  Info this is metro station on piaţa Unirii and probably Unirea Shopping. Geocoding soon --Pudelek 21:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)  Info - location is done --Pudelek 22:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC) OK. --H005 20:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - Village Museum 7 - old CoA.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - Village Museum 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kretzulescu Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Quite OK to me, fulfills all criteria. --Myrabella (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curtea Veche church - tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica Curtea Veche - entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ateneul Român 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. -- Smial 18:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:BRD Tower in Bucharest.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BRD Tower in Bucharest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedrala Patriarhală 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Cayambe 09:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest after the rain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Insufficient description (no street name or geocode) -- H005 00:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)  Info location --Pudelek 11:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Shows very well the typical chaos on Bucharests's streets. :-) -- H005 19:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Underpass in Bucharest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Insufficient description (no station name or geocode) -- H005 00:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)  Info location --Pudelek 11:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Good. -- H005 19:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - mural 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - mural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unirii Boulevard and Palace of the Parliament.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A minor issue, after reflection. --Cayambe 19:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Adnotacje

U mnie dzialaja, moze to jakas chwilowa awaria. Herr Kriss (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Moze masz jakis gadzet, ktory to psuje? Herr Kriss (talk) 11:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - Council Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. My only wish is that the tent in front was gone, but that's probably not in your control! --99of9 10:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creţulescu church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Silesian descriptions

Hi and many thanks for adding Silesian description to some of my pictures! Could you please expand the Silesian descriptions so that they correspond to the other descriptions (Czech, English, Russian)? I do not dare to do it myself as unfortunately my Silesian is very bad. Thank you in advance!--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 17:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Ahoj Marcine, díky za odpověď! Určitě nechci vytvářet nějaká nová slova. Myslel jsem spíš na překlad názvů, které se obvykle překládají (například Židovská autonomní oblast - polsky Żydowski Obwód Autonomiczny). Tak, aby popisek fotky ve slezštině odpovídal popisku v ostatních jazycích.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Díky!--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronstadt (Braşov, Brassó) - Art Nouveau building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could have been better, and probably needs minor gamma adjust, but apart from that meets QI criteria. -- Smial 02:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - mural 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Aqwis 15:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romanian Patriarchal Cathedral - external mosaics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Aqwis 15:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Szyndzielnia-1907.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Szyndzielnia-1907.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Herr Kriss (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

A miales te pocztowke w reku? Herr Kriss (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Zdarzaly sie i takie przypadki, ze autor byl podany z drugiej strony. Herr Kriss (talk) 20:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

No to jest cos w stylu pd-anonyumos. Poszukaj, moe bez myslnika, moze z wielkimi literami. Herr Kriss (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)