Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposição GDSesimbra.JPG: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
JozeSlb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Undo revision 53629501 by JozeSlb (talk)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delh}}
=== [[:File:Exposição_GDSesimbra.JPG]] ===
=== [[:File:Exposição_GDSesimbra.JPG]] ===
Permission was obtained only for Wikipedia. I [http://pedromendessb.blogspot.com/2010/08/exposicao-grupo-desportivo-de-sesimbra.html asked] for a more specific permission statement, but this remained unanswered for the past month. [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Permission was obtained only for Wikipedia. I [http://pedromendessb.blogspot.com/2010/08/exposicao-grupo-desportivo-de-sesimbra.html asked] for a more specific permission statement, but this remained unanswered for the past month. [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Line 7: Line 8:
::See also [[Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_26#Please_delete_2]] - [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
::See also [[Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_26#Please_delete_2]] - [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
i already asked pedro mendes about the specific permition, now we have to wait for his answer. [[User:JozeSlb|JozeSlb]] ([[User talk:JozeSlb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
i already asked pedro mendes about the specific permition, now we have to wait for his answer. [[User:JozeSlb|JozeSlb]] ([[User talk:JozeSlb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
:This file can be safely flushed now, 50 days have passed without any response after my question. [[User:Jcb|Jcb]] ([[User talk:Jcb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 15:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
----
'''Deleted:''' not valid authorization, only for wikipedia, not free license [[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 00:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
{{delf}}

Latest revision as of 19:34, 26 April 2011

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission was obtained only for Wikipedia. I asked for a more specific permission statement, but this remained unanswered for the past month. Jcb (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your portuguese is not the best one, when pedro mendes say "pode utilizar" means I can publish it under a free license JozeSlb (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My Portuguese is good enough to see that you didn't ask if he wants to publish it under a free license and that there is no reason to assume that he is aware of the fact that you would publish it under a free license. Jcb (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Portuguese is not good enough, but if you want it i can ask Pedro Mendes that JozeSlb (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to cheat with me. I can clearly understand your insufficiently formulated request for permission and the short answer. Also a PT-N admin confirmed to me that my conclusions were right. Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_26#Please_delete_2 - Jcb (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i already asked pedro mendes about the specific permition, now we have to wait for his answer. JozeSlb (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file can be safely flushed now, 50 days have passed without any response after my question. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not valid authorization, only for wikipedia, not free license Ezarateesteban 00:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]