Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposição GDSesimbra.JPG: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
JozeSlb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Undo revision 53629501 by JozeSlb (talk)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
'''Deleted:''' not valid authorization, only for wikipedia, not free license [[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 00:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
'''Deleted:''' not valid authorization, only for wikipedia, not free license [[User:Ezarate|Ezarate]]<small>[[User Talk:Ezarate|esteban]]</small> 00:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
{{delf}}
{{delf}}

Pedro Mendes says: 25 Abril, 2011 "Tal como anteriormente mencionado autorizo a utilização da foto. You can use the photo for Wikipédia. Em inglês pode alguém não ter percebido."

Pedro Mendes said he authorizes the use of the photo!! what are the reason for the photo be deleted??? [[User:JozeSlb|JozeSlb]] ([[User talk:JozeSlb|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:34, 26 April 2011

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission was obtained only for Wikipedia. I asked for a more specific permission statement, but this remained unanswered for the past month. Jcb (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your portuguese is not the best one, when pedro mendes say "pode utilizar" means I can publish it under a free license JozeSlb (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My Portuguese is good enough to see that you didn't ask if he wants to publish it under a free license and that there is no reason to assume that he is aware of the fact that you would publish it under a free license. Jcb (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Portuguese is not good enough, but if you want it i can ask Pedro Mendes that JozeSlb (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to cheat with me. I can clearly understand your insufficiently formulated request for permission and the short answer. Also a PT-N admin confirmed to me that my conclusions were right. Jcb (talk) 20:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_26#Please_delete_2 - Jcb (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i already asked pedro mendes about the specific permition, now we have to wait for his answer. JozeSlb (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file can be safely flushed now, 50 days have passed without any response after my question. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not valid authorization, only for wikipedia, not free license Ezarateesteban 00:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]