User talk:Palauenc05: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
ArchiverBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 180 days) to User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 40
Line 419: Line 419:


{{#invoke:Autotranslate|autotranslate|1=File:Andlau tour sorciéres(3).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Runi Gerardsen|Runi Gerardsen]] ([[User talk:Runi Gerardsen|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 07:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Autotranslate|autotranslate|1=File:Andlau tour sorciéres(3).jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} [[User:Runi Gerardsen|Runi Gerardsen]] ([[User talk:Runi Gerardsen|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 07:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

== Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 - Deutschland ==

[[File:WLM-Banner-Bg{{#switch:{{Zufallszahl|3}}|1 = -2016|2 = -2017}}.jpg|1032px]]
{{clear}}
Hallo Palauenc05,
[[File:Marksburg im Winter.jpg|thumb|Sieger 2023 – Marksburg im Winter ]]

bald ist es soweit: Vom '''1. bis zum 30. September 2024''' findet zum 14. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb '''Wiki Loves Monuments''' (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat [[:User:Rolf Kranz|Rolf Kranz]] mit einer Winteransicht der Marksburg und der Schornsteine der Blei- und Silberhütte Braubach gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2023 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel in [[:de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Schenkenzell|Schenkenzell]] in Baden-Württemberg oder in [[:de:Liste der Baudenkmale in Oyten|Oyten]] in Niedersachsen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft [[:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Deutschland/Denkmale|diese Übersichtsseite]]. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der [[:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Deutschland/Mitmachen|Mitmach-Seite]].

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine [https://uploadmap.toolforge.org/denkmalde.html Upload-Karte] erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr [[:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Deutschland/Sonderpreis|drei Sonderpreise für Bilder zum Thema „Kinderwelten“]] ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Bauwerken, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind. Dieser Sonderpreis wird gemeinsam mit dem [[:de:Klexikon|Klexikon]] vergeben.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

<div style="text-align:center; margin:1em 0;">{{Clickable button|target=https://uploadmap.toolforge.org/denkmalde.html |text='''{{LangSwitch|de=Klick hier, um deine Fotos über die neue Upload-Karte hochzuladen!|en=Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map}}'''|iconSecondary=ui-icon-heart|class=ui-button-green ui-button-large|external=true}}</div>

<div style="text-align:center; margin:1em 0;">{{Clickable button|target={{fullurl:Special:UploadWizard|campaign=wlm-de-special_2024}} |text='''{{LangSwitch|de=Klick hier, um deine Fotos für den Sonderpreis hochzuladen!|en=Upload your photos for the special price}}'''|iconSecondary=ui-icon-heart|class=ui-button-green ui-button-large|external=true}}</div>

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab '''Anfang September 2024''' an der [[:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Deutschland/Vorjury|Vorjury]] teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist [https://voting.wikilovesmonuments.de/prejury/index.php hier] bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

<div style="text-align:center; margin:1em 0;">{{Clickable button|target=https://voting.wikilovesmonuments.de/prejury/|text=Vorjury-Tool|iconSecondary=ui-icon-heart|external=true|class=ui-button-red}}</div>

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der [[:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024/Deutschland/Support|Support-Seite]] zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte [{{fullurl:de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments/Deutschland/Optout|action=edit}} hier] ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --'''[[User:Z thomas|Z]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Z thomas|thomas]]</sup> 17:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:11, 29 August 2024

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Mutter Gottes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Waldemar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld Banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, RV: Martin Luther..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehrang Blankenheimer Kreuz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Stadtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Kurfürst Ludwig I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier-Biewer St-Jakobus-Brunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted/lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version. --Palauenc05 18:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*Good quality -- Spurzem 19:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "Mutter Gottes"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "False Waldemar is not let into the town"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Jakobus-Fountain in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Söhne der Stadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Landkreis 1 Million 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: three sons of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain (1829-1898) at Viehmarktplatz in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: view of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Datum

Hallo! Ist das Bild vom Treppenaufgang Pfeiffersbrücke auch von 2022 wie das von der Petrusskulptur, oder vom 16.3.24? Kann man normalerweise davon ausgehen, dass das Aufnahmedatum dem angegebenen Datum entspricht? (Da ich der Vollständigkeit halber gerne das taken-on-Template einsetze) VG P170 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Palauenc05: Vielleicht möchtest Du bei Gelegenheit nochmal genauer auf die Frage(n) antworten :-) --P170 (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Die in den Bildbeschreibungen angegebenen Daten sind die Aufnahmedaten. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar, Danke --P170 (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Pfeiffersbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Petrus 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: Prince-elector Ludwig I..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fischers Maathes reclining on his sofa..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blankenheimer Kreuz in Trier-Ehrang, Germany (after restoration)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Saint Peter in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former stairway to "Pfeiffersbrücke" in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier-Ruwer Wegekreuz 1632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mertert wayside shrine (1882).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1632) in Trier-Ruwer, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mertert-Manternach Brücke über die Syr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Challenging light. If you have the RAW file: Can you further work on the highlights. Small areas of one stone are burnt, the same with areas of the sky. --Tuxyso 12:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version. --Palauenc05 23:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Tuxyso 06:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zadar Votive column bell tower of Saint Elijah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Koorscht o Kneisjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Wichshänsjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 14:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen3 (Krons Ton).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 16:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Koorscht o Kneisjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Wichshänsjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Krons Ton" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 16:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 09:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weimar 50 Pfennig 1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamburg Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andlau tour sorciéres(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Runi Gerardsen (talk) 07:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 - Deutschland

Hallo Palauenc05,

Sieger 2023 – Marksburg im Winter

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2024 findet zum 14. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Rolf Kranz mit einer Winteransicht der Marksburg und der Schornsteine der Blei- und Silberhütte Braubach gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2023 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel in Schenkenzell in Baden-Württemberg oder in Oyten in Niedersachsen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Bilder zum Thema „Kinderwelten“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Bauwerken, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind. Dieser Sonderpreis wird gemeinsam mit dem Klexikon vergeben.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 
Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 17:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]