Commons:Deletion requests/Image:No Israel.svg: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
removed strikethrough from other users' comment.
Line 30: Line 30:
: [[User:Rama|Rama]] 11:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
: [[User:Rama|Rama]] 11:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
* {{vk}} I agrre with [[User:Rama|Rama]]. --[[User:Maderibeyza|Maderibeyza]] 12:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
* {{vk}} I agrre with [[User:Rama|Rama]]. --[[User:Maderibeyza|Maderibeyza]] 12:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
*{{vd}} Wikipedfa is no place for antisemitic racist propaganda. Someone ban this troll. /[[User:Jebur|Jebur]] 22:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:52, 16 January 2008

  • Add {{subst:delete-subst|REASON (mandatory)}} on the page
  • Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Image:No Israel.svg}}--~~~~
  • On the log, add :
    {{Commons:Deletion requests/Image:No Israel.svg}}

This image seems to exist for the sole or principal purpose of attacking or intimidating other users and is of a nature apparently intended to shock or give offense to some, and appears to have no encyclopedic or other Wikimedia related use. Attack images should be considered a form of vandalism. Thuresson 18:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a candidate for a {{speedydelete}}. Mutter Erde 18:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. ‌I was thinking that it's the same of Image:Non aux religions.png, Image:No god.PNG, Image:No music.svg or Image:Anti-soccer.png, isn't it?--OsamaK 10:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep We have a large number of such images aimed at activities, ideologies and religions. --Simonxag 21:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We have too many images that's unencyclopedic (e.g. Personal photos or above ones..)--OsamaK 13:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This picture is only in use by OsamaK [1] and I don't think, that you can use this picture in any Wikipedia-Article -- Ra'ike Diskussion 11:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
All these images (Image:Non aux religions.png, Image:No god.PNG, Image:No music.svg or Image:Anti-soccer.png) not in used but in users pages, I can't see the different--OsamaK 13:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any answer for my questions? Remember that "Polling is not a substitute for discussion"--OsamaK 18:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete doesn't this fall under "The file/page is not potentially usable by any current or future Wikimedia project" not necessarily suitable for a speedy, but the fact that other similar but not the same images haven't been deleted isn't any sort of explanation of why this one shouldn't be, right? Jessamyn 04:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What about usera pages, aren't these one of Wikimedia's project pages? there are too many images that don't use but in a user page (e.g. Personal photos..).--OsamaK 10:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if it will be deleted, I'll request all these images above (and othere) ;) (can't see the different).--OsamaK 10:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Troll? Many users don't agree with that, you can see this link :).--OsamaK 11:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It would be very useful to see this request too.--OsamaK 11:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let´s do 2 votes: One for these people, who want to install you as admin and the other for these who want to ban you. I´m very curious. Mutter Erde 11:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mutter Erde, please try to stay calm and civil. Calling people names in a discussion remotely connected to Israel is like smoking in a petrol station. Rama 11:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No reason to delete:
    • We do have numerous images which are not a direct encyclopedic nature. Remember that we feed images to all Wikimedia projects, like Wikinews for instance
    • That the image is not of an encyclopedic nature remains to be proved
    • We do host images for the benefit of users' pages
    • We do host images which are scarcely used, if at all.
Rama 11:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]