User talk:Denniss/Archive 4

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

---

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Start a new talk topic.

---

Discussion page archive

• Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3

---

Images at Chail Military School Chail

We are glad that you have visited our wiki page to report copyrights. We have all the original images uploaded at our parent site http://chailmilitaryschool.webs.com/ and these images are either contributed by several living and dead people or taken by us to be used with school pages. We have also emailed permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about the permissions.

Is it possible to change name of our page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chail_Military_School to Rashtriya Military School Chail as the school name has changed. If you can let us know how to do it, we will be do it.

Once again thanks for your efforts and time.

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Lates niloticus.png
• File:Junkers Ju52 3M.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Denniss!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Power20302.jpg was uncategorized on 10 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

nothing is copywritten...done with dreamweaver

24.163.49.69

Hey,

Just wondering if I have done everything you've asked for. Thanks

(The Balance Music (talk) 18:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC))

WM Peugeot

Hi mate, excuse me, may be I don't know, you are telling me that is not allowed to take a pic from a video?--Vittorio 78 (talk) 11:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, now I see that I made a mistake, I didn't choose the right licensing.--Vittorio 78 (talk) 12:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Abb615 file "elephant_toothpaste_1.png

its a screencap from a youtube video im using in an article, that's okay, right? sorry im a bit confused with all the copyrights

edit: currently getting ORTS permission ... Abb615 (talk) 14:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tabatha_Cash_portrait.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tabatha_Cash_portrait.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tabatha_Cash_portrait.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Decade montages dispute (1980s, 1990s, 1960s, 1970s)

These are originally my montages, He has taken all the credit and changed them to the way he likes it, and stops anybody from improving them, only wanting it his way. I'm just trying to put them back where they belong and have my credit for it.CatJar (talk) 00:50, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Image Tagging File:UNNOBA_Logo_y_Edificios_3.jpg

Hallo Denniss.

I saw that you have labeled a picture I've uploaded, saying that it has no information on his license. The image was assembled by me, using Corel Draw. I have the CDR file available if required.

I have uploaded many photos taken by me and also graphs and diagrams drawn by me, leaving them free to be copied and used by others. The label says that "there is no proof that the author agrees to publish this photo under the informed license", but the author is me...

Please do not delete this work, and show me what is missing or what must I do.

Danke!

Regards,

--Germanramos (talk) 02:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Denniss. The label is still there. My work may be deleted and I don't know what to do. Danke! Regards, --Germanramos (talk) 12:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

What's the source of the images used for the compilation? Are the source images made by you or by others? You need to state the source of these images. --Denniss (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Diane Kruger pictures

Hello Denniss

I hope you are doing well. I really like Diane Kruger, what is the best way to upload a really good picture of her if you are not sure about the license of the picture. The way the policy is showing is that the only way to upload a picture of her is to have taken the picture yourself. Do you have any suggestions.

regards.

Control

HELLO

• Can you check [1] page?

Thank you. User talk:Merve.1996 18:46 April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Please give me some time

Hello, Could you please give me some time to upload the permission regarding all the images i have uploaded, since my Microsoft Office Outlook is corrupted? I'm planning to go to the local library to do the jobs. If you could not wait for me, there is another way - it is to ask the photographers of the images by going to the links underneath the images; I hope you won't have to do that. Thanks Sp33dyphil 08:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I don't know how to upload my Hotmail mails onto WikiCommons, I have tried my best but somebody has deleted the images. Could you pretty please show me how to upload the permissions because i don;y know what POP3 or IMAP are, PLEASE HELP ME! Thanks Sp33dyphil 07:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how to upload permissions

Hello Denniss, I don't know how to upload image permissions regarding VNA photos. I don't know what POP3 or IMAP or HTTP are. could you tell me what they are? Thanks Sp33dyphil 00:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol

Ich hab dich mal zum Autopatroller gemacht. Bearbeitungen von Nicht-Patrollern werden in den Recent Changes und der Beobachtungsliste mit kleinem roten Ausrufezeichen markiert. Siehe Template:Autopatrolgiven für die Standardnachricht. --Martin H. (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Danke --Denniss (talk) 06:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Image Tagging File:Kurilev_2009.jpg

HELLO Denniss.

You have labeled an image I've uploaded, saying that it has no information about license. After that I sent permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, 24 April 2010). But the label is still there. Can you check this image again?

Thank You!

Regards,

-- Electric Guerillas (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File:ThaiPoliticalCrisis.PNG

Hello Denniss! I am writing regarding the file File:ThaiPoliticalCrisis.PNG that you've previously stated as No essential source information. I, Harley Hartwell (talk · contribs), as a friend of ThHorus (talk · contribs), the creator of the file in question, have already indicated all sources which have been used to make a derivative work in question, along with the original license. If you could kindly check the image in question and identified that source were added or if there are other problems regarding the image, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. --Harley Hartwell (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Should be fine now. --Denniss (talk) 06:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Answer:Portal do Intercâmbio.png

Thank you for the warning. I thought that it hadn't problem send to the Commons an image taken from a television series. In my opinion, it should be allowed to send images to the Commons, only writing the image source without need a free license, because it would contribute to a more illustrated Wikipedia. Nevertheless, thanks for the warning.

Vielen Dank für die Warnung. Ich dachte, es sei nicht Problem entsenden, um die Commons ein Bild aus einer TV-Serie übernommen. Meiner Meinung nach sollte es erlaubt, Bilder auf die Commons zu senden, sondern nur schriftlich Bild-Quelle ohne die Notwendigkeit einer freien Lizenz stehen, weil sie zu einer illustrierten Wikipedia beitragen würde. Trotzdem danke für die Warnung. (Automatic translation)
--Marcelo Henrique Bittencourt ^talk 21:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

A screenshot of copyrighted material is considered fair use and will be speedily deleted here. --Denniss (talk) 22:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I uploaded that image because I was trying to find a way to contribute to Commons. But if it's so, the solution is to wait until the Commons accept fair use (if it happen someday).

--Marcelo Henrique Bittencourt ^talk 23:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Won't ever happen as fair use is only accepted in a small number of countries. --Denniss (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Collage

Actually, at the moment I removed the tag there was already a deletion request going on. Simple maitenance: if you see a file with a DR and have additional concerns, it's not needed to tag the file, but to explain the concerns in the DR. The starter of it later withdraw it, which may had led to you finding the file without either thing. In any case, I didn't create that collage, I simply replaced a problematic image in it with another. But it's right, all images must be sourced. I started trying to locate the images, bu later changed my mind and simply create a new collage

If you are satisfied with the new one I made, we may universally replace the former one with the new, and then delete it. Have in mind that "Buenos Aires" is a national capital of an important country and a high visible article at projects: although we must still follow copyright rules, it should be better to do it in a way that doesn't leave all those articles without a lead image Belgrano (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

New compilation may be good but you have to respect the copyright of others. You can't use GFDL and/or CC licensed images and release the compialtion as PD. Using a FreeArt licensed image may also be a bad idea - i don't know if it's compatible with CC license types, you probably can't change CC to FreeArt and vice versa. --Denniss (talk) 22:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I have a question

Can I upload pictures from my mobile? My camera is broke. Soda POP (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

?

[2] MachoCarioca (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

[3] MachoCarioca (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Please read Template:PD-Italy and the relevant discussion page. Your license may be somewhat valid in Italy but not in the rest of the world. This makes it an invalid license for Commons and all files will be deleted soon. --Denniss (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

There is no discussion over there. The license is clear. MachoCarioca (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

I've found a discussion about 'italian photographs' at all, this is not the matter here, but 'screenshots'. MachoCarioca (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

PS That discussion about photographs has more 'keep' than 'delect', as I saw it.

Italian filmsscreenshots are PD, PD are PD, japanese (accepted here), finlandeses (accepted here), russians (accepted here) or americans (accepted here). You can't change italian laws over their own products or give 'interpretations' to a CLEAR and EXPLICIT law. MachoCarioca (talk) 18:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Stadiumsoccercity.jpg

Hi Denniss. I've removed the {{no source}} tag you added to this file. The uploader stated it was his/her own photo. - Gump Stump (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Luc Jochimsen

Hallo,

tut mir leid ich habe mich verschrieben bei meiner ersten email an Herrn Thalheim. Bitte schau auf die Diskussionsseite des Bildes. Danke!

--PolskiNiemiec (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Fitxers jbaropuig

Quant carrego fitxers a commons, encara que siguin d'internet, procuro sempre seguir les llicencies. Els dos fitxers que vols anul·lar procedeixen d'un artxiu de lliure circulació (domini pùblic), cerca-ho en la pagina http://www.ejercitodelaire.mde.es/ , veurás que totes les fotos que espubliquen en aquesta pagina son de domini pùblic. 22.35 9/6/10 jbaropuig.

Berlusconi image

There is no need of OTRS permission, the source of the picture is fully compatible with Wikimedia Commons. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 16:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Emma Watson Flickrwashing

Thanks for noticing--I thought it looked a bit suspicious, but wasn't overly sure--it was for enwiki's Files for upload area, so I'm not intentionally trying to introduce more copyvios!  fetchcomms☛ 17:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I added the flickr user to COM:QFI to prevent such accidential flickrvios (or better: to find them). --Martin H. (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Wolfgang Stark

Both of those picture, I take it myself. If there is mis-write of license, please change it. Cheers. Albert 06:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Also the file of Messi. Albert 06:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

who are you

who are you? what do you want for my pic? i cant understand too deep english it shows your name by my page so i came here figure it out

Silvio Berlusconi (2010)-modif.png

Thanks you for your advertise, however, I already putted the permission taken from the site (Aviso legal). --Habib.mhenni (talk) 15:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Neither in the spanish version nor in the english version of "aviso_legal" are they talking about reusing images. There's only a statement: This information may be used in part or fully with no obligation to acknowledge the source but that's not a sufficient permission to reuse their images. --Denniss (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

This information reports to The content, organization, and choosing of the links found in la-moncloa.es... and in our case it concerns The content, so the use of this content may be used in part or fully with no obligation to acknowledge the source. This is my point of view. Cordially --Habib.mhenni (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

P.S. If I am wrong, how do you explain this :) ?

CHEVROLET CORSA

Caro amigo Denniss, eu não consigo entender como eu devo postar as imagens. Eu procurei elas no Google, em diversos links diferentes. Vejo que na wikipédia, tem inúmeras fotos, mas de onde os usuários retiraram estas fotos? Como faço para postar-las sem invadir os direitos autorais?

Eu tenho também estas fotos do Corsa, em meu computador, fiz um mosáico para não haver nenhum problema.

Obrigado pela atenção. Aguardo a resposta.

see the copyvio note on Mariobrasil's talk page --:bdk: 13:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Ana Lupe Fernandez - Txoriak Kantari diskoa (1971).jpg

Hello you were quicker than I was, I asked the uploader of the file to specify the license. --Neozoon (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Transport_GDL_MX.GIF

Hello and greetings, the design of the image is mine and I am User author: User: Jtorreslara01 of my work, to which design I it in my program of COREL DRAW and COREL-PHOTO PAINT, if the flocks volvere to put it again. Greetings and thank you very much. User: Jtorreslara01

Please always link source images for image compilations (even if they are your own work); using the bus company logos may be a trademark/copyright problem too. --Denniss (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blackhawk_close.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blackhawk_close.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Blackhawk_close.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

img deletion

hi! i think this image should be deleted. cheers!--Camr (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

No licence files (File:Pseudotsuga menziesii trunk.JPG,‎ File:Magnolia officinalis Rogów.JPG, File:Acer japonicum Rogów.JPG‎ and File:Thuja plicata foliage underside.JPG‎)

I forgot to add the license, now is ok --Crusier (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File:MNY2010-CB.jpg

Greetings, Denniss. I am a former admin on Commons (desysopped due to inactivity), and a member of the OTRS team. I have been in communication with the public figure w:Claire Buffie, and she agreed to license her photo under a free license. I uploaded the file, tagged appropriately. All this is detailed at File:MNY2010-CB.jpg. I see that earlier today you tagged the image as not having appropriate permission. When the author agrees in writing to release the image under a free license, in my experience that's all that is needed. So why did you tag it as "no permission", and what can we do to rectify the situation?

All the best, Quadell (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

(P.S., if you could reply on my talk page, that would be best for me. Thanks.)

Denniss

Dear Denniss

I like to find a really good picture of Diane Kruger, but most good pictures that I find, I am not sure about if it is public domain or who is the copyright owner. Can you please help me find a good picture of Diane Kruger that I can upload and it will be copyright protected. Regards

Hi Denniss, You flagged me for this (File:Pwelogo2.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation.) I'd like to know how it is a copyright violation when I own the image as I am the artist of said image? thank you 72.77.187.239 17:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

F-16 image

Hi, can you explain why the F-16 image (File:Pakistan F-16D block 52 high res.jpg) has been removed? If a comment in the metadata states it belongs to Lockheed-Martin, what about the source of the image (link here) which clearly states in the caption "U.S. Air Force photo"? --Hj108 (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

If the image metadata clearly stated Lockheed-Martin as source this is correct. Images made by US government employees are often clearly marked with rank/title uploader/creator or have this info in the Metadata. US Government websites holds many 3rd-party images, these are not always marked as "courtesy image". In short: wrong caption for the image on the linked website. --Denniss (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Laurent Terzieff

Hello, First, please excuse my english. I'm the owner of the photo of Laurent Terzieff. So why did you cancell it? ThanKs for your reply (and to restore my photo) Regards

Just taking a screenshot of something makes you not own the image. Instead the copyright of the source is transferred to this screenshot. --Denniss (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Take Ivy Book Cover

Hi, I've been having difficulty with the cover for a book that has been out of publication for a long time because I am unsure what its copyright designation is. The photo in question is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Take_Ivy-Book_Cover.jpg and it has been deleted before.

I would really appreciate your help in making it possible for this picture to stay in the commons.

Vielen Dank,

Robert

Type of aircraft

Hi Deniss. Last year you added the type of aircraft to several of my photos. This year I took two photos: File:Belgian_aircraft_M.jpg and File:Belgian_aircraft_N.jpg. Please could you look at it and add the right category if you know it? Thanks, Wouter (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, but all files here are listed. I see no reason for this template being there - thus I remove it. With Zugdidi, ok, I didn't do that immediately. Still all images are from commons, and easiest search would show them. --George M. (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Troy pictures

Dear Denniss

Thank you very much. I will read more and pay more attention about the images next time. Regards Strong.soldier23 (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyviol

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maruti_Exterior_1.JPG

Hi, this is a copyviol? --Corvettec6r (talk) 08:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SUZUKI_SAMURAI_PASSO_LUNGO.jpg copyviol (there are the logo of italian site Subito.it)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nuevo-fiat-uno-2009-renovado-para-argentina.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unoway.jpg copyviol --Corvettec6r (talk) 17:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File

Hi, the File has yes the source is by uncyclopedia. See you. Jacson (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Where's the primary source of this file? Where the license you added in the secondary source you listed ? --Denniss (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Is the originaly post in uncyclopedia. Jacson (talk) 16:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

1) Highly questionable claim. 2)Irrelevant as a closer inspection revealed a noncommercial cc-by-sa-3.0 license. Thus it will be deleted anyway. --Denniss (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

No, you're wrong, please go here. Thanks. Jacson (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Denniss is right. 1) The person who uploded it to uncyclopedia is likely not the author 2) The source is published under cc-by-nc-sa license, that license is not allowed here. --Martin H. (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Mateus Carrieri and Marcelo Adnet

Hello Denniss, look at these images on flickr, they can not be deleted! [4] and [5] their licenses are compatible with the Commons and I told the truth. Truu (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Falsche Kategorie

Hallo!

Du hast hier bei diesem Bild eine falsche Kategorie gesetzt, nämlich Category:Tank railway wagons. Diese Kategorie umfasst jedoch nicht - wie du vermutlich dachtest - den Transport von Panzern per Bahn, sondern Tankwaggons zum Transport von Flüssigkeiten und Suspension. Hier die korrekte Kategorie für diese Thematik: Category:Transport of military vehicles by rail. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 13:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Removal of passed flickrreview

What was the point in removing a passed flickrreview, including the link to the image on Flickr?--Edaen (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Please guide me further

According to my knowledge, i have sent an e-mail to the e-mail address mentioned in your message. But for confirmation, I am sending that e-mail again to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please guide me further in this matter. Thank you. Shahrukh syed (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Images of Gryllus bimaculatus virus

Hello Denniss,

Thanks for your help with the images File:Gryllus_bimaculatus_virus2.jpg, File:Gryllus_bimaculatus.jpg and File:Gryllus_bimaculatus_virus1.jpg. The author asked me to upload these images and I explained to him that he needs to send the standard email to Wikimedia Commons giving his permission. I will follow this up by telephone.

Bernhard Zelazny (talk) 07:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Addition: I have phoned the author who explained to me that the email has not been sent yet and that he is going on leave in the coming days. I will remind him end of the month again to send the email.

Bernhard Zelazny (talk) 09:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

It may be possible these images will be deleted in the meantime. But if a sufficient permission arrives via OTRS they'll be undeleted. --Denniss (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Drago_Druškovic_Etching_sample_a.jpg

Hallo Denniss, danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit&Info.

Ich kenne den Künstler seit ~4 Jahrzehnten relativ gut, habe sein mündliches OK für derlei Uploads, erreiche ihn aber dzt. nicht (Urlaub?).

Frage:
Kann man die Löschung ohne allzu großen Tamtam ggf. noch weitere +2 Wochen hinauszögern? Falls nicht, auch kein S.E.H.R großes Problem, später neu hochladen kann ich diese Mini-Datei immer noch. lg, [w.] 07:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Auch wenn die Datei gelöscht werden sollte kann diese nach Erhalt der Genehmigung wiederhergestellt werden. Verschwindet ja nicht sofort im Mülleimer. --Denniss (talk) 16:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

ACK -- obwohl ich glaube, dass der re-Upload der geringere Verwaltungsaufwamd wäre -- ICH hab' ja Zeit. ;) &eod. -- lg, [w.] 18:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Milka.E.G..jpg

Какого вы удалили файл File:Milka.E.G..jpg ? Сведения о нём были переданы в OTRS и получено разрешение на публикацию от автора. Требую объяснений и восстановления файла.--Spaniel (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Canadian Constitution Act Signing.jpg

Please do not add deletion tags to images where OTRS is pending. It doesn't matter that you have arbitrarily decided that three months is enough time to have handled all OTRS issues. It is really disruptive to other projects to start needlessly deleting images used in articles; it is not very helpful to say that we can "undelete" the images later on (not to mention creates a lot of unnecessary work for everyone involved). If you think too much time has gone by, make an inquiry to find out the OTRS status before tagging the image. I have made that inquiry, so hopefully we will have an answer soon enough. I suspect that no OTRS submission was ever made (given the uploader's lack of activity on Commons), but it's important to get the actual facts before rashly deleting/undeleting files. Thanks. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

It looks like the OTRS request was never submitted. The volunteer has asked that someone else doubel-check. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:47, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Ritz-Montréal.jpg

Hi Dennis,

I don't unserstand your remark about this picture. The source is a personnel picture on the english wikipedia. What's wrong? Thanks?--Ancien et moderne (talk) 03:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Demi Lovato 2009 cropped.jpg

Could you please explain why you changed the licence of this image?^[6] To my best understanding, CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported is absolutely acceptable for derivative works where the original has been licensed under CC-BY 2.0 Generic. So, if there's indeed no incompatibility, then it would be entirely at my discretion to choose an appropriate (for Wikipedia) license for the derivative that I have created (and where the original author is properly given credit as required by the license). I'm afraid that unless you provide a valid reason for your change I'll be forced to revert it. Thanks. — Luchesar • T/C 21:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

In fact, even if you do have valid reasons, it would probably have been more appropriate to drop me a message on my talk page, rather than changing the license yourself, wouldn't it? — Luchesar • T/C 22:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

This small modification (cut-out) did not qualify for a licrense change. In no way does it qualify for additional restrictions (the share-alike add-on). It's always better to keep the original license type to avoid trouble. --Denniss (talk) 01:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, OK, that makes sense and thanks for the hint. But I still believe it's better to notify the user than to silently make modifications to their work. I realize this takes time, but then again, it's also the best way to avoid trouble. ;-) — Luchesar • T/C 09:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Lee_Ryan.jpg?!!!

Hi Denis, Did you even check the source to see if it is copyrighted or you just delete the picture because you were not comfortable with the license type? I just can't understand; I'm not suppose to talk like that but it WAS a free image from Dailymail website I believe, not a FAKE LICENSED picture as you described on the file deletion description. Or maybe I don't know how to use Wikipedia by now! SiarFisher (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

The latter. The file at source was not licensed under the selected {{Cc-by-2.5}}, it is not licensed by the copyright holder under any license conditions that allow unrestricted reuse by anyone, anywhere (not only in Wikipedia), for any purpose including modification and commercial reuse. But thats exactly what is required here on Commons and all other Wikimedia projects - simply: free content. See Commons:First steps, Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms. --Martin H. (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Removed file...

---

File Tagging File:Anders_Sandberg.gif Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anders_Sandberg.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 12:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Hello Denniss,

Exactly why did you remove this picture? Anders is my best friend and I took this picture myself during a photoset i Spain a couple of years ago..

Best Regards

Raffen 14:39 2010-08-28

Yehudi Menuhin

Scuza dar nu stiu limba engleza, asa ca iti vorbesc in romaneste. Fisierul insertat de mine cu Yehudi Menuhin este cam din anul 1935 in care Yehudi Menuhin a avut un duet cu Grigoras Dinicu si imaginea este opera mea deoarece este o captura din filmare.

Drago, nochmals (permissions)

Hallo Denniss, ich erhielt soeben das "Forward" einer heutigen Mail von Drago Druskovic (beliebige Schreibweisen ;) an "permissions" -- statt den von mir vorgegebenen Text per COPY+PASTE zu übernehmen, hat er ihn allerdings offensichtlich abgetippt und bei den Dateinamen Fehler gemacht (ein Künstler eben... ;)

Frage: Ist dies dennoch fürs OTRS-Ticket akzeptabel, oder soll ich ihn nochmals bitten, die "permission" mit exakten Dateinamen zu erteilen? S. dazu ggf. User_talk:W.#Files_you_uploaded_may_be_deleted

lg, [w.] 12:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Ich glaube meine Anfrage ist auf Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Category:Drago_Dru.C5.A1kovi.C4.8D besser aufgehoben -- ob Du Dich dann drum kümmerst, oder sonstwer, überlasse ich "Euch allen" ;))

lg, [w.] 12:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Wiki AL CD 3.jpg

Wiki AL CD 3.jpg Denniss (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC), в чём может быть нарушение? Не понял! Фото сделано мной. Лобановский в курсе того, что страницу о нём делаю. Он предоставил информацию. Верните файл!13243546A (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Trailer Sink the Bismarck! : copyright ?

Hello, If you still think the files from the trailer Sink the Bismarck! must be removed due to copyright infringement, thank you to attach a banner 'Idw' (file deletion warning) so that the community can discuss the question (my argument is that this is the US theatrical trailer - thank you not to remove the link -, released without copyright notice). Good Day. CecilF (talk) 08:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:B-2_spirit_bombing.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:B-2_spirit_bombing.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blagoveschensk-guard-ship.jpg

Warum hältst Du hier ein OTRS-ticket für nötig? --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Leopard3.jpg

Hi Denniss, I saw this image in the article about Leopards in the English wikipedia with the caption titled "Indian leopard (Panthera pardus fusca)". But since you did not provide any info when you initially uploaded this file, I would just like to know where you took this photo of the leopard. I just wonder whether this is really an Indian leopard. Looking forward to your reply - I suggest in this very section of yours. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Apocalypse Now

Hi Denniss, I got your message. I have the links to the pages where it is explicitly mentioned that these images can be used under CC license: "Attribution -- Noncommercial -- No derivative works." But I have already uploaded the images and don't know where to provide those links to corroborate its rational use. Please enlighten me, or if you would, I can send you the links in the next post and you can do the necessary. Looking forward to your reply.-- Cupidcobra1 (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but noncommercial and nonderivative are restrictions not accepted at Commons, please see Commons:Licensing --Denniss (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Direktor Marti.jpg - upload von bfswebstat

Hallo Denniss

Danke für die Meldung an bfswebstat betreffend "file:Direktor Marti.jpg".

Soeben haben wir von BFS Serviceweb eine Mail mit einer Permission geschickt. Ich hoffe, das geht so in Ordnung? Falls nicht, melde Dich bitte wieder.

Liebe Grüsse bfswebstat

Das ist in Ordnung so, die Bearbeitung einer solchen Mail dauert aber ein wenig. --Denniss (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Mail has been received (in the French-speaking OTRS permission queue), approved and processed; I just have to create a template to tag the images created by User:Bfswebstat, so that they can easily refer to this blanket permission (which covers future uploads by this user as well). Schutz (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Eliane Bastos cover arts

Hi Martin! Some files were deleted, but I think it was a mistake. I'm the designer of all Eliane Bastos' cover arts. I'm also the producer of the singer. So how could we revert the deletions of the files?

• File:Capa Toda Essencia.jpg
• File:Capa Toda Essencia alternativa.jpg
• File:Capa CD Alem de Mim.jpg

Luis.filidis (talk) 23:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Please follow instructions given by the no permisson notice of your last upload. With this permission mail you may notice the already deleted files to have them undeleted. Or just reupload them after our permission was confirmed as sufficient. More info at COM:OTRS. --Denniss (talk) 17:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Permission granted for files : Keyti_by_Haessner.jpg and ALIF_By_Haessner.jpg

Dear Denniss, I sent the required authorization to permissions-commonswikimedia.org on October 19th. Thank you for taking it into consideration. Regards, JennyMbaye (talk) 14:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Ajka accident images

Hello Denniss,

I see that you start to insert insourced warning templates into the images I have uploaded.

Would you be so kind as to:

1. check the images, do read the image license, the source and if you insist, check the linked page for the permission [apart from the fact that I have the official permission in writing as well as I happen to be the person to actually requested the officials to made it possible for these images to be used in Commons];
2. remove your templates since I have unfortunately no time to clean up that many pages;
3. if you have any further questions be so kind as to ask first, tag after. If you do not have the time to actually read the license and ask about it - if you have any questions - then be so kind as not to insert false templates into the images. This ignorant behaviour makes Commons a lot worse place for end-users than it should be.

Thanks for your kind cooperation. --grin ✎ 13:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

File licence and copyrights violation

Hi Denniss,

I recieved many messages regarding rights and copyrights violations for pictures I have uploaded to illustrate video game pages. I understand that it is important to respect copyrights, but I actually work for Namco Bandai and I have the rights to use and publish those images on Wikipedia.

I honnestly don't really know what extra permissions I have/can give, as I "am" the direct source of those pictures. (Should it be for the copyright violation or the OTRS). Could you enlighten me do what I have to do extra ?

Thank you very much,

--CharlotteNBGE (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Please follow instructions given by the no permisson notice of your last upload. With this permission mail you may notice possible deleted files to have them undeleted. Or just reupload them after your permission was confirmed as sufficient. More info at COM:OTRS. It may take a while for the OTRS volunteers to process your mail though. --Denniss (talk) 12:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I added source

File:Hanninen.jpg

I´ve added link to source at flickr.com where it is under Creative Commons Attribution license. Now it´s ok right?

Images permission

Hi! I recieved a message from you telling that I need to send a permission for using the following images: File:Hand_oxygen_mixer2.jpeg

File:OxyStone2.jpg The owner of the site www.oxycock.com and the owner of The Oxycock Company let me use these images for the articles about the oxygen cocktail. Please, tell me in what form should I send this permission because I got it through e-mail and in Russian. Is it supposed to be a scan of a written document of some kind?

Logos

Denniss, we've in teracted on ENWP before. I find the Commons to be highly confusing in taggin articles as possible copyright vialoations. Can you point me to a page tht deals with these issues? It concerns the image File:Nikita 2010 logo.svg. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 07:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Hakeem

You're right about that Hakeem photo, I think. I just cropped a photo I saw on here without bothering to check the license, and copied the tag. See here. Quadzilla99 (talk) 11:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Angela_Merkel_2008_cropped.png

File:Angela_Merkel_2008_cropped.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lettres (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Shaved_penis_banana.jpg

File:Shaved_penis_banana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

89.247.199.71 00:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

For all the help tagging copyvios - it is appreciated. If you feel it appropriate maybe having the rights to deal with them yourself might be worth considering? Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Adriana Lobo

• PT - Favor, indicar (melhor) como autorizar para que minhas fotos permaneçam. Adriana Lobo (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

• EN - Please indicate (best) to authorize that my pictures remain. Adriana Lobo (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Dennis, vc indicou esses artigos acima para eliminação por dizer que faltam informações. Sinceramente, discordo. Adriana Lobo é autora do trabalho, é a retratada na obra, e ela própria posta as fotos, colocando-as sob domínio público. Está explícito nas informações das fotos td isso. Se não se importa, vou remover as marcações que vc colocou. Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

About File:Ciudad_La_Plata_montage.jpg

I thought I had put the source in the file. Anyways I updated the info. I think now it is ok. --Tincho GELP (talk) 12:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jana_simkova.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jana_simkova.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jana_simkova.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Denniss (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm the author of this photo. I give you all details about licence and author during the upload process. I don't understand why I need to give this information again ...

Crosswiki issues

Hi. I'm from pt.wikipedia. I notice that you sometimes revert copyrights violations on pt.wiki (and others wikis). I came to ask you to report me on pt.wiki - if possible - about the future copyvio's related with this case. He ocasionally edits at pt.wiki also when he creates another account here on Commons. This user is blocked indefinitely on pt.wiki for these violations. Including, he was range blocked there also, which I think you should do the same at least for a short period. You can also report some user on Meta if you detect a new sock puppet since pt.wiki has no checkusers at this moment. I would be glad if you can do that. Thank you.” T_eleS (T _{PT @ C G}) 04:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Patrick Tyler - Susan Biddle photo

Dennis - Not sure how to give you everything you need on Susan Biddle photo, which was provided to me gratis for use in biographical references and promotion of my book, A World of Trouble. It has been used on Amazon.com for more than a year and other places on the web. She also shot the jacket photo for my book. What else can I provide ? - Patrick Tyler

File:Sharman Joshi partyy.jpg

Hi,

• File:Sharman Joshi partyy.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I do not understand your tag of this image. The source is stated in the infobox. Did you intend to tag differently or perhaps made a mistake? Thanks, Fæ (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

It was tagged with a reason. First, the source is not directly linked but via another website using images from the source site. A license verification is not possible this way. Second, the image is tagged as reviewed by an admin or image reviewer but the uploader does not seem to be any of these two. --Denniss (talk) 12:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

This file was discussed on the OTRS noticeboard. Images of this type and from this source are correctly covered by the OTRS ticket quoted, if you are being misled then this is a problem with the clarity of the template. The uploader may not have been a recognized image reviewer (and neither am I) but the notice you added challenges the source, not the nature of the reviewer.

Note, I have updated the template used with more accurate wording based on the original OTRS email received. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for clarification of the template. I'll remove the no source tags from valid images. EDIT: Does the template produce an autotag if an unauthorized users reviews the images? --Denniss (talk) 17:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

No, I have no idea how we would do that either. It would be a cool addition. Fæ (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

The Flickrreview template does this, I believe I have also seen this with picasareview. Maybe worth asking there how to implement this. --Denniss (talk) 18:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Good suggestion, I'll investigate in a few days time as I'll be tied up with other events for a bit. Fæ (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Turminha da Graça.PNG

I have placed the free license of the photo. Please, can you take out the file of the rapid elimination filter? Thanks, --Richard Leoni Leon (talk) 19:04, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Android 2.2 Screenshot

Hello Deniss, I've changed the permission and license on the screenshot I've uploaded to wikimedia commons following the permission and license the previous version of Android screenshot. Is it already ok? Thanks! Zakiakhmad (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Turminha da Graça.PNG

I've send the authorization to the e-mail:permissions-pt-nf@wikimedia.org, and placed the correct permission in the file. Please, see if everything is okay. Thanks.

Cordially, --Richard Leoni Leon (talk) 12:04, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Mozambique army officer

Hi Denniss. For File:FADM Training Officer.jpeg, I am a bit puzzled why you queried the source information on this file. It is PD-GOV-USA, U.S. Marine Corps, and the exact webpage that the file came from is listed - Marines.mil, or the U.S. Marine Corps. What is unclear? Please do explain, because I do not understand right now. Kind regards from Aotearoa New Zealand, Buckshot06 (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Low res image, no Exif-data, link to file missing, text did not indicate it was actually made by an US Gov employee. Just because an image is hosted on a US Gov server does not automatically render it into a PD-USGov license type. --Denniss (talk) 02:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

OK. Since you tagged this I've added the U.S. VRIN number, added a link to the hi-res image, and I would draw your attention, again, to the fact that these are all U.S. Africa Command official propaganda photos. I do not actually know what Exif-data is, but if you explain that to me I'll fix that as well. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

permitions

i already put the permitions for all my images.its everything ok now with the images? JozeSlb (talk) 22:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)