default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDQoMEX 2011: Mechelen, Belgium
- Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2011, Mechelen, Belgium, September 7-9, 2011. IEEE 2011, ISBN 978-1-4577-1333-0
- Miguel Ríos Quintero, Alexander Raake
:
Towards assigning value to multimedia QOE. 1-6 - Dominik Strohmeier, Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö, Katja Eulenberg:
Open Profiling of Quality: Probing the method in the context of use. 7-12 - Julie Lassalle, Laetitia Gros, Gilles Coppin:
Combination of physiological and subjective measures to assess quality of experience for audiovisual technologies. 13-18 - Martín Varela, Jukka-Pekka Laulajainen:
QOE-driven mobility management - Integrating the users' quality perception into network - Level decision making. 19-24 - Jong-Seok Lee, Francesca De Simone, Touradj Ebrahimi:
Subjective quality assessment of scalable video coding: A survey. 25-30 - Savvas Argyropoulos, Alexander Raake, Marie-Neige Garcia, Peter List:
No-reference video quality assessment for SD and HD H.264/AVC sequences based on continuous estimates of packet loss visibility. 31-36 - Kazuhisa Yamagishi, Lina J. Karam, Jun Okamoto, Takanori Hayashi:
Subjective characteristics for stereoscopic high definition video. 37-42 - Blazej Lewcio, Benjamin Belmudez, Theresa Enghardt, Sebastian Möller:
On the way to high-quality video calls in future mobile networks. 43-48 - Christian Keimel, Julian Habigt, Manuel Klimpke, Klaus Diepold:
Design of no-reference video quality metrics with multiway partial least squares regression. 49-54 - Pengpeng Ni, Ragnhild Eg, Alexander Eichhorn, Carsten Griwodz, Pål Halvorsen:
Spatial flicker effect in video scaling. 55-60 - Nicolas Staelens, Iñigo Sedano, Marcus Barkowsky, Lucjan Janowski, Kjell Brunnström, Patrick Le Callet:
Standardized toolchain and model development for video quality assessment - The mission of the Joint Effort Group in VQEG. 61-66 - Selim S. Sarikan, Ramazan F. Olgun, Gözde B. Akar:
Quality evaluation of stereoscopic videos using depth map segmentation. 67-71 - Tsung-Jung Liu, Weisi Lin, C.-C. Jay Kuo:
A multi-metric fusion approach to visual quality assessment. 72-77 - Martin D. Dimitrievski, Zoran A. Ivanovski, Tomislav Kartalov:
No-reference image visual quality assessment using nonlinear regression. 78-83 - S. A. Amirshahi, Mohamed-Chaker Larabi:
Spatial-temporal Video Quality Metric based on an estimation of QoE. 84-89 - Songnan Li, Lin Ma, King Ngi Ngan:
Video quality assessment by decoupling additive impairments and detail losses. 90-95 - Beibei Wang, Dekun Zou, Ran Ding, Tao Liu, Sitaram Bhagavathy, Niranjan D. Narvekar, Jeffrey A. Bloom:
Efficient frame complexity estimation and application to G.1070 vide quality monitoring. 96-101 - Marie-Neige Garcia, Alexander Raake:
Frame-layer packet-based parametric video quality model for encrypted video in IPTV services. 102-106 - Sebastian Möller, Jens Berger, Alexander Raake, Marcel Wältermann, Benjamin Weiss:
A new dimension-based framework model for the quality of speech communication services. 107-112 - Fitri N. Rahayu, Ulrich Reiter, Junyong You, Andrew Perkis, Touradj Ebrahimi:
Subjective visual quality assessment in the presence of audio for Digital Cinema. 113-118 - Katrin Schoenenberg, Alexander Raake, Janto Skowronek:
A conversation analytic approach to the prediction of leadership in two to six-party audio conferences. 119-124 - Toon De Pessemier, Katrien De Moor, Adrian Juan Verdejo, Davy Van Deursen, Wout Joseph, Lieven De Marez, Luc Martens, Rik Van de Walle:
Exploring the acceptability of the audiovisual quality for a mobile video session based on objectively measured parameters. 125-130 - Tobias Hoßfeld, Raimund Schatz, Sebastian Egger:
SOS: The MOS is not enough! 131-136 - Kristina Kunze, Dominik Strohmeier, Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö:
Comparison of two mixed methods approaches for multimodal quality evaluations: Open Profiling of Quality and Conventional Profiling. 137-142 - Stephen J. Davis, Eva Cheng, Ian S. Burnett, Christian H. Ritz:
Multimedia user feedback based on augmenting user tags with EEG emotional states. 143-148 - Luís Pinto, João Carreira, Sérgio M. M. de Faria, Nuno M. M. Rodrigues, Pedro A. Amado Assunção:
Subjective quality factors in packet 3D video. 149-154 - Jing Li, Marcus Barkowsky, Patrick Le Callet:
The influence of relative disparity and planar motion velocity on visual discomfort of stereoscopic videos. 155-160 - Jari Korhonen, Ulrich Reiter, Junyong You:
Subjective comparison of temporal and quality scalability. 161-166 - Hani Alers, Lennart Bos, Ingrid Heynderickx:
How the task of evaluating image quality influences viewing behavior. 167-172 - Zicong Mai, Mahsa T. Pourazad, Panos Nasiopoulos:
Contrast effect on 3D and 2D video perception. 173-176 - Asiya Khan, Lingfen Sun, Jose Oscar Fajardo, Ianire Taboada, Fidel Liberal, Emmanuel C. Ifeachor:
Impact of end devices on subjective video quality assessment for QCIF video sequences. 177-182 - Ulrich Engelke, Yohann Pitrey, Patrick Le Callet:
Towards an inter-observer analysis framework for multimedia quality assessment. 183-188 - Thomas Richter:
SSIM as global quality metric: A differential geometry view. 189-194 - Anish Mittal, Anush K. Moorthy, Alan C. Bovik, Lawrence K. Cormack:
Automatic prediction of saliency on JPEG distorted images. 195-200 - Judith Redi, Ingrid Heynderickx:
Image quality and visual attention interactions: Towards a more reliable analysis in the saliency space. 201-206 - Seyed Navid Haji Mirza, Ebroul Izquierdo:
Examining visual attention: A method for revealing users' interest for images on screen. 207-212
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-11-15 19:19 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
