Interwar period: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by 192.189.12.5 (talk) to last version by Progüvo06
updating information
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|1918–1939 period between the World Wars}}
{{Redirect|Between the wars|other subjects|Between the Wars (disambiguation)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2015}}
{{Missing information|the [[Estado Novo (Portugal)|Estado Novo]] of Portugal established in 1933|date={{monthyear}}}}
[[File:Post WWI Conflict Map In New-York Tribune November 9 1919 Page 26.jpg|thumb|alt=Map of Europe with numbered locations|400px|
The ''[[New-York Tribune]]'' printed this map on 9 November 1919, of the armed conflicts in Central and Eastern Europe in 1919, one year after World War I had ended:<ref>{{cite news |url=https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1919-11-09/ed-1/seq-26/ |newspaper=New-York Tribune |first=Frank H. |last=Simonds |title=A Year After the Armistice—The Unsettled Disputes |date=9 November 1919 |page=26 |access-date=10 November 2019 |archive-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109153518/https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1919-11-09/ed-1/seq-26/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 8 ⟶ 9:
}}]]
[[File:BlankMap-World-1921.png|alt=|thumb|296x296px|Boundaries in 1920]]
In the [[history of the 20th century]], the '''interwar period''' (or '''interbellum''') lasted from 11{{spaces}}November 1918 to 1{{spaces}}September 1939 (20{{spaces}}years, 9{{spaces}}months, 21{{spaces}}days) – from the end of [[World War I]] (WWI) to the beginning of [[World War II]] (WWII). It was relatively short, yet featured many social, political, military, and economic changes throughout the world. Petroleum-based energy production and associated mechanisation led to the prosperous [[Roaring Twenties]], a time of [[social mobility|social]] and [[economic mobility]] for the [[middle class]]. [[Automobile]]s, [[Electric light|electric lighting]], [[radio]], and more became common among populations in the [[developed world|first world]]. The era's indulgences were followed by the [[Great Depression]], an unprecedented worldwide economic downturn that severely damaged many of the world's largest economies.
 
Politically, the era coincided with the rise of [[communism]], starting in Russia with the [[October Revolution]] and [[Russian Civil War]], at the end of World War IWWI, and ended with the rise of [[fascism]], particularly in Germany and Italy. China was in the midst of a half-century of instability and the [[Chinese Civil War]] between the [[Kuomintang]] and the [[Chinese Communist Party]] and many warlords. The empires of [[British Empire|Britain]], [[French colonial empire|France]], and others faced challenges as [[imperialism]] was increasingly viewed negatively and independence movements emerged in many [[Colony|colonies]]; in Europe, after protracted low-level fighting [[Irish War of Independence|most of Ireland became independent.]]
In the [[history of the 20th century]], the '''interwar period''' (or '''interbellum''') lasted from 11{{spaces}}November 1918 to 1{{spaces}}September 1939 (20{{spaces}}years, 9{{spaces}}months, 21{{spaces}}days) – from the end of [[World War I]] to the beginning of [[World War II]]. It was relatively short, yet featured many social, political, and economic changes throughout the world. Petroleum-based energy production and associated mechanisation led to the prosperous [[Roaring Twenties]], a time of [[social mobility|social]] and [[economic mobility]] for the [[middle class]]. [[Automobile]]s, electric lighting, [[radio]], and more became common among populations in the [[developed world|first world]]. The era's indulgences were followed by the [[Great Depression]], an unprecedented worldwide economic downturn that severely damaged many of the world's largest economies.
 
Politically, the era coincided with the rise of [[communism]], starting in Russia with the [[October Revolution]] and [[Russian Civil War]], at the end of World War I, and ended with the rise of [[fascism]], particularly in Germany and Italy. China was in the midst of a half-century of instability and the [[Chinese Civil War]] between the [[Kuomintang]] and the [[Chinese Communist Party]]. The empires of [[British Empire|Britain]], [[French colonial empire|France]], and others faced challenges as [[imperialism]] was increasingly viewed negatively and independence movements emerged in many colonies; in Europe, after protracted low-level fighting [[Irish War of Independence|most of Ireland became independent.]]
 
The [[Russian Empire|Russian]], [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]], [[Austria-Hungary|Austro-Hungarian]], and [[German Empire]]s were dismantled, with the [[Partition of the Ottoman Empire|Ottoman territories]] and [[German colonial empire|German colonies]] redistributed among the [[Allies of World War I|Allies]], chiefly Britain and France. The western parts of the Russian Empire, [[Estonia]], [[Finland]], [[Latvia]], [[Lithuania]], and [[Second Polish Republic|Poland]] became independent nations in their own right, and [[Bessarabia]] (now [[Moldova]] and parts of [[Ukraine]]) [[Union of Bessarabia with Romania|chose to reunify]] with [[Kingdom of Romania|Romania]].
 
In Russia, the [[Bolsheviks]] managed to regain control of Belarus and Ukraine, Central Asia, and the Caucasus, forming the [[Soviet Union]]. In the [[Near East]], [[Kingdom of Egypt|Egypt]] and [[Kingdom of Iraq|Iraq]] gained independence. During the [[Great Depression]], countries in [[Latin America]] nationalised many foreign companies (most of which belonged to the [[United States]]) in a bid to strengthen their own economies. The territorial ambitions of the Soviets,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/invasion-poland-september-1939|title=Invasion of Poland, September 1939|date=17 October 2023 |publisher=The National WWII Museum|quote="The result was the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August 23 [1939]… the crucial part of the agreement… reshaped the map of Central Europe… Bessarabia, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and eastern Poland would become part of Stalin’s sphere of influence…"|access-date=2024-06-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240511014822/https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/invasion-poland-september-1939|archive-date=2024-05-11}}</ref> Japanese, Italians, and Germans led to the expansion of their domains.
 
Militarily, the period would see a markedly rapid advance in technology which, alongside lessons learned from WWI, would catalyze new strategic and tactical innovations.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/military-aircraft/Interwar-developments | title=Military aircraft - Interwar, Developments, Technology &#124; Britannica | date=24 June 2024 }}</ref> While the period would largely see a continuation of the development of the technologies pioneered in WWI, debates emerged as to the most effective use of these advancements.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2018/2/28/interwar-airpower-grand-strategy-and-military-innovation-germany-vs-great-britain | title=Interwar Airpower, Grand Strategy, and Military Innovation: Germany vs. Great Britain | date=28 February 2018 }}</ref> On land, discussions focused on how [[armoured warfare|armoured]], [[mechanized infantry|mechanized]], and [[motorized infantry|motorized]] forces should be employed, particularly in-relation to the 'traditional' branches of the [[infantry|regular infantry]], [[horse cavalry]], and [[artillery]].<ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/military-innovation-in-the-interwar-period/armored-warfare-the-british-french-and-german-experiences/03DE45DCEB84DDD97B199F782B94A04C | doi=10.1017/CBO9780511601019.002 | chapter=Armored warfare: The British, French, and German experiences | title=Military Innovation in the Interwar Period | date=1996 | last1=Murray | first1=Williamson | pages=6–49 | isbn=978-0-521-55241-7 }}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis|url=https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/33688/64634986-MIT.pdf?sequence=2|title=Innovation, Wargaming, and the Development of Armored Warfare|first=Daniel S.|last=Carter|date=June 2005|degree=M. Poli. Sci.|publisher=Massachusetts Institute of Technology}}</ref> In the air, the question of allocating [[air forces]] to [[strategic bombing]] versus dedicating such forces to frontline [[close air support]] was the primary contention, with some arguing that [[interceptor aircraft|interceptor]] development was outpacing [[bombers]], and others maintaining that "[[the bomber will always get through]]." In the [[navy|naval]] sphere, the primary question was whether [[battleships]] would maintain their dominance of the seas or be rendered virtually obsolete by [[naval aviation]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2019/december/incubate-innovation-aviation-lessons-interwar-period | title=Incubate Innovation: Aviation Lessons from the Interwar Period}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1998/february/innovation-interwar-years | title=Innovation for the Interwar Years}}</ref>
The military deliberations and controversies characteristic of the interwar period would ultimately find resolution via the events of WWII,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/great-debate |title=The Great Debate }}</ref> which served as a foundation for many of the tenets, [[military doctrine|doctrines]], and strategies of [[modern warfare]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://today.usc.edu/impact-of-world-war-i-shaping-the-modern-world/ |title=How did WWI reshape the modern world? |date=9 November 2018 }}</ref> Overall, the innovations of WWI and the interwar period would see a shift away from 'traditional' [[Line of battle|line-]] and [[front line|front-based warfare]] and towards a significantly more mobile, mechanized, and [[asymmetric warfare|asymmetric]] form of combat.
 
== Turmoil in Europe ==
Line 58 ⟶ 61:
 
[[Italian fascism|Fascism]] took control of the [[Kingdom of Italy]] in 1922; as the Great Depression worsened, [[Nazism]] emerged victorious in Germany, fascism spread to many other countries in Europe, and also played a major role in several countries in Latin America.<ref>{{cite book |first=Stanley G. |last=Payne |title=A History of Fascism, 1914–1945 |location=Madison |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |year=1995 |isbn=0-299-14870-X }}</ref> Fascist parties sprang up, attuned to local right-wing traditions, but also possessing common features that typically included extreme militaristic nationalism, a desire for economic self-containment, threats and aggression toward neighbouring countries, oppression of minorities, a ridicule of democracy while using its techniques to mobilise an angry middle-class base, and a disgust with [[cultural liberalism]]. Fascists believed in power, violence, male superiority, and a "natural" hierarchy, often led by dictators such as [[Benito Mussolini]] or [[Adolf Hitler]]. Fascism in power meant that liberalism and human rights were discarded, and individual pursuits and values were subordinated to what the party decided was best.<ref>{{cite book |first=Robert |last=Soucy |chapter=Fascism |chapter-url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism/Common-characteristics-of-fascist-movements |title=Encyclopaedia Britannica |year=2015 |access-date=2 December 2017 |archive-date=25 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181025142743/https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism/Common-characteristics-of-fascist-movements |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
== Empire of Japan ==
{{Main|Empire of Japan|Japanese colonial empire|List of territories occupied by Imperial Japan|Statism in Shōwa Japan}}
[[File:Pacific Area - The Imperial Powers 1939 - Map.svg|thumb|Political map of the Asia-Pacific region, 1939]]
 
The Japanese modelled their [[Economy of Japan|industrial economy]] closely on the most advanced Western European models. They started with textiles, railways, and shipping, expanding to electricity and machinery. The most serious weakness was a shortage of raw materials. Industry ran short of copper, and coal became a net importer. A deep flaw in the aggressive military strategy was a heavy dependence on imports including 100 per cent of the aluminium, 85 per cent of the iron ore, and especially 79 per cent of the oil supplies. It was one thing to go to war with China or Russia, but quite another to be in conflict with the key suppliers, especially the United States, Britain, and the Netherlands, of oil and iron.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig">{{cite book |first1=John K. |last1=Fairbank |first2=Edwin O. |last2=Reischauer |first3=Albert M. |last3=Craig |title=East Asia: The Modern Transformation |location=Boston |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |year=1965 |pages=501–4 |oclc=13613258 }}</ref>
 
Japan joined the [[Allies of World War I|Allies of the First World War]] to make territorial gains. Together with the British Empire, it divided up Germany's territories scattered in the Pacific and on the [[Coastline of China|Chinese coast]]; they did not amount to very much. The other Allies pushed back hard against Japan's efforts to dominate China through the [[Twenty-One Demands]] of 1915. Its [[Japanese intervention in Siberia|occupation of Siberia]] proved unproductive. Japan's wartime diplomacy and limited military action had produced few results, and at the Paris Versailles peace conference at the end of the war, Japan was frustrated in its ambitions. At the [[Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920)|Paris Peace Conference]] in 1919, its [[Racial Equality Proposal]] led to increasing diplomatic isolation. The 1902 alliance with Britain was not renewed in 1922 because of heavy pressure on Britain from Canada and the United States. In the 1920s Japanese diplomacy was rooted in a largely liberal democratic political system, and favoured internationalism. By 1930, however, Japan was rapidly reversing itself, rejecting democracy at home, as the Army seized more and more power, and rejecting internationalism and liberalism. By the late 1930s it had joined the Axis military alliance with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig" />{{rp|563–612, 666}}
 
In 1930, the London disarmament conference angered the [[Imperial Japanese Armed Forces]]. The [[Imperial Japanese Navy]] demanded parity with the United States, Britain and France, but was rejected and the conference kept the 1921 ratios. Japan was required to scrap a [[capital ship]]. Extremists assassinated Japanese Prime Minister [[Inukai Tsuyoshi]] in the [[May 15 Incident]] and the military took more power, leading to rapid [[democratic backsliding]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Paul W. Doerr|title=British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zumqs15aTfwC&pg=PA120|year=1998|page=120|publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=9780719046728|access-date=16 March 2018|archive-date=17 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191117110339/https://books.google.com/books?id=Zumqs15aTfwC&pg=PA120|url-status=live}}</ref>
[[File:Zhang Xueliang and Chiang Kai-shek.jpg|thumb|Zhang Xueliang with [[Chiang Kai-shek]] in November 1930.]]
 
==== Japan seizes Manchuria ====
{{Main|Japanese invasion of Manchuria}}
 
In September 1931, the Japanese [[Kwantung Army]]—acting on its own without government approval—[[Japanese invasion of Manchuria|seized control of Manchuria]], an anarchic area thatin northeastern China hadthat notwas controlled inby the powerful warlord [[Zhang decadesXueliang]]. It created the puppet government of [[Manchukuo]]. Britain and France effectively controlled the League of Nations, which issued the [[Lytton Report]] in 1932, saying that Japan had genuine grievances, but it acted illegally in seizing the entire province. Japan quit the League, and Britain and France took no action. US Secretary of State [[Henry L. Stimson]] announced that the United States would also not recognise Japan's conquest as legitimate. Germany welcomed Japan's actions.<ref>{{cite journal |first=David Wen-wei |last=Chang |title=The Western Powers and Japan's Aggression in China: The League of Nations and 'The Lytton Report' |journal=American Journal of Chinese Studies |year=2003 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=43–63 |jstor=44288722 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Shin'ichi |last=Yamamuro |title=Manchuria under Japanese Dominion |publisher=U. of Pennsylvania Press |year=2006 |postscript=; }} online {{cite journal |title=Review |journal=Journal of Japanese Studies |volume=34 |issue=1 |year=2007 |pages=109–114 |doi=10.1353/jjs.2008.0027 |s2cid=146638943 }}</ref>
 
==== Towards the conquest of China ====
{{Main|Second Sino-Japanese War}}
[[File:First pictures of the Japanese occupation of Peiping in China.jpg|thumb|right|Japanese march into [[Zhengyangmen]] of Beijing after capturing the city in July 1937]]
 
The civilian government in Tokyo tried to minimise the Army's aggression in Manchuria, and announced it was withdrawing. On the contrary, the Army completed the conquest of Manchuria, and the civilian cabinet resigned. The political parties were divided on the issue of military expansion. Prime Minister Tsuyoshi tried to negotiate with China but was assassinated in the May 15 Incident in 1932, which ushered in an era of [[Japanese nationalism|nationalism]] and [[Japanese militarism|militarism]] led by the [[Imperial Japanese Army]] and supported by other right-wing societies. The IJA's nationalism ended civilian rule in Japan until after 1945.<ref>{{cite book |first=James L. |last=Huffman |title=Modern Japan: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YWLhAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA143 |year=2013 |page=143 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-63490-2 |access-date=16 March 2018 |archive-date=13 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213140338/https://books.google.com/books?id=YWLhAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA143 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
The Army, however, was itself divided into cliques and factions with different strategic viewpoints. One faction viewed the Soviet Union as the main enemy; the other sought to build a mighty empire based in Manchuria and northern China. The Navy, while smaller and less influential, was also factionalised. Large-scale warfare, known as the [[Second Sino-Japanese War]], began in August 1937, with [[Battle of Shanghai|naval and infantry attacks focused on Shanghai]], which quickly spread to other major cities. There were numerous [[Japanese war crimes|large-scale atrocities]] against Chinese civilians, such as the [[Nanjing massacre]] in December 1937, with mass murder and mass rape. By 1939 military lines had stabilised, with Japan in control of almost all of the major Chinese cities and industrial areas. A puppet government was set up.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig" />{{rp|589–613}} In the U.S., government and public opinion—even including those who were isolationist regarding Europe—was resolutely opposed to Japan and gave strong support to China. Meanwhile, the Japanese Army fared badly in large battles with the [[Red Army|Soviet Red Army]] in Mongolia at the [[Battles of Khalkhin Gol]] in summer 1939. The USSR was too powerful. Tokyo and Moscow [[Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact|signed a nonaggression treaty in April 1941]], as the militarists turned their attention to the European colonies to the south which had urgently-needed oil fields.<ref>{{cite book |first=Herbert |last=Feis |title=The Road to Pearl Harbor: The Coming of the War Between the United States and Japan |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1960 |pages=8–150 |oclc=394264 }}</ref>
 
== Spain ==
{{Main|Second Spanish Republic|Francoist Spain}}
 
=== Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) ===
Line 66 ⟶ 96:
The Spanish Civil War was marked by numerous small battles and sieges, and many atrocities, until the Nationalists won in 1939 by overwhelming the Republican forces. The Soviet Union provided armaments but never enough to equip the heterogeneous government militias and the "[[International Brigades]]" of outside [[Far-left politics|far-left]] volunteers. The civil war did not escalate into a larger conflict, but did become a worldwide ideological battleground that pitted all the [[Communism|Communists]] and many [[Socialism|socialists]] and [[Liberalism|liberals]] against [[Catholic Church|Catholics]], conservatives and fascists. Worldwide there was a decline in [[pacifism]] and a growing sense that another [[world war]] was imminent, and that it would be worth fighting for.<ref>{{cite book |first=E. H. |last=Carr |title=The Comintern and the Spanish Civil War |location=London |publisher=Macmillan |year=1984 |isbn=0-394-53550-2 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Robert H. |last=Whealey |title=Hitler and Spain: The Nazi Role in the Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939 |year=2005 |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |isbn=0-8131-9139-4 }}</ref>
 
== Great Britain and British Empire ==
{{Main|Interwar Britain}}
[[File:British Empire 1921.png|thumb|upright=1.8|The Second British Empire at its territorial peak in 1921]]
Line 74 ⟶ 104:
[[File:ImperialConference.jpg|thumb|[[George V]] with the British and Dominion prime ministers at the [[1926 Imperial Conference]]]]
 
[[British Raj|India]] strongly supported the Empire in the First World War. It expected a reward, but failed to get [[self-government]] as the government was still kept in control of British hands and feared another rebellion like [[Indian Rebellion of 1857|that of 1857]]. The [[Government of India Act 1919]] failed to satisfy demand for self-rule. Mounting tension, particularly in the [[Punjab region]], culminated in the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre|Amritsar Massacre]] in 1919. [[Indian nationalism]] surged and centred in the [[Indian National Congress|Congress Party]] led by [[Mahatma Gandhi|Mohandas Gandhi]].<ref>{{cite book |first1=Donald Anthony |last1=Low |first2=Rajat Kanta |last2=Ray |title=Congress and the Raj: Facets of the Indian Struggle, 1917–47 |publisher=Oxford UP |year=2006 |isbn=0-19-568367-6 }}</ref> In Britain, public opinion was divided over the morality of the massacre between those who saw it as having saved India from anarchy and those who viewed it with revulsion.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Derek |last=Sayer |title=British reaction to the Amritsar massacre 1919–1920 |journal=Past & Present |volumeissue=131 |issue=1 |year=1991 |pages=130–64 |doi=10.1093/past/131.1.130 }}</ref><ref name="Mowat 12">{{Cite book |last1=Mowat |first1=C. L. | author-link = C. L. Mowat |title=The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. 12: The Shifting Balance of World Forces, 1898–1945 |url=https://archive.org/stream/iB_CMH/12#page/n3/mode/1up |year=1968 |edition=2nd}} – 25 chapters; 845 pp</ref>
 
Egypt had been under [[History of Egypt under the British|''de facto'' British control]] since the 1880s, despite its nominal ownership by the [[Ottoman Empire]]. In 1922, the [[Kingdom of Egypt]] was granted [[Unilateral Declaration of Egyptian Independence|formal independence]], though it continued to be a [[client state]] following British guidance. Egypt joined the League of Nations. Egypt's [[Fuad I of Egypt|King Fuad]] and his son [[Farouk of Egypt|King Farouk]] and their conservative allies stayed in power with lavish lifestyles thanks to an informal alliance with Britain who would protect them from both secular and Muslim radicalism.<ref>{{cite book |first=Hugh |last=McLeave |title=The Last Pharaoh: Farouk of Egypt |location=New York |publisher=McCall |year=1970 |isbn=0-8415-0020-7 }}</ref> [[Mandatory Iraq]], a British [[League of Nations mandate|mandate]] since 1920, gained official independence as the [[Kingdom of Iraq]] in 1932 when [[Faisal I of Iraq|King Faisal]] agreed to British terms of a military alliance and an assured flow of oil.<ref>{{cite book |first=Gerald |last=De Gaury |title=Three Kings in Baghdad, 1921–1958 |location=London |publisher=Hutchinson |year=1961 |oclc=399044 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Bulliet |first1=Richard |others=et al. |title=The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History. Vol. 2: Since 1500 |year=2010 |publisher=Cengage Learning |edition=5th ed Cengage Learning |isbn=978-1439084755}} excerpt pp. 774–845</ref>
Line 80 ⟶ 110:
In [[Mandatory Palestine|Palestine]], Britain was presented with the problem of mediating between the [[Palestinians|Palestinian Arabs]] and increasing numbers of [[Yishuv|Jewish settlers]]. The [[Balfour Declaration]], which had been incorporated into the terms of the mandate, stated that a national home for the [[Jews|Jewish people]] would be established in Palestine, and Jewish immigration allowed up to a limit that would be determined by the mandatory power. This led to increasing conflict with the Arab population, who openly [[1936–39 Arab revolt in Palestine|revolted in 1936]]. As the threat of war with Germany increased during the 1930s, Britain judged the support of Arabs as more important than the establishment of a Jewish homeland, and shifted to a pro-Arab stance, limiting Jewish immigration and in turn triggering a [[Jewish insurgency in Palestine|Jewish insurgency]].<ref name="Mowat 12" />{{rp|269–96}}
 
The Dominions (Canada, Newfoundland, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the Irish Free State) were self-governing and gained semi-independence in the World War, while Britain still controlled foreign policy and defence in all except Ireland. The right of the Dominions to set their own foreign policy was recognised in 1923 and formalised by the 1931 [[Statute of Westminster 1931|Statute of Westminster]]. The Irish Free State effectively broke all ties with Britain in 1937, leaving the Commonwealth and becoming an [[Republic of Ireland|independent republic]].<ref name="Mowat 12" />{{rp|373–402}}
 
== French Empire ==
Line 126 ⟶ 156:
== Italy ==
{{Main|Fascist Italy (1922–1943)}}
{{Further|Second Italo-Ethiopian War|Italian invasion of Albania|History of Greece (1923–1940)}}[[File:Italy aims Europe 1936.png|thumb|Ambitions of Fascist Italy in Europe in 1936.<br />Legend:{{Legend|#073A09|Metropolitan Italy and dependent territories;}}{{Legend|#0F7612|[[Client state]]s;}}{{Legend|#083A39|Claimed territories to be annexed;}}{{Legend|#107776|Territories to be transformed into client states.}} [[Albania]], which was a client state, was considered a territory to be annexed.]]
[[File:Impero italiano.svg|thumb|right|Maximum extent of imperial Italy {{legend|#ff0000|Pre-Second World War}}{{legend|#ff00ff|Captured during the Second World War}}]]
 
Line 161 ⟶ 191:
{{Main|Republic of China (1912–1949)|Warlord Era|Nanjing decade|Chinese Civil War}}
{{Empty section|date=May 2022}}
 
=== Japanese dominance in East Asia ===
{{Main|Empire of Japan|Japanese colonial empire|List of territories occupied by Imperial Japan|Statism in Shōwa Japan}}
[[File:Pacific Area - The Imperial Powers 1939 - Map.svg|thumb|Political map of the Asia-Pacific region, 1939]]
 
The Japanese modelled their [[Economy of Japan|industrial economy]] closely on the most advanced Western European models. They started with textiles, railways, and shipping, expanding to electricity and machinery. The most serious weakness was a shortage of raw materials. Industry ran short of copper, and coal became a net importer. A deep flaw in the aggressive military strategy was a heavy dependence on imports including 100 per cent of the aluminium, 85 per cent of the iron ore, and especially 79 per cent of the oil supplies. It was one thing to go to war with China or Russia, but quite another to be in conflict with the key suppliers, especially the United States, Britain, and the Netherlands, of oil and iron.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig">{{cite book |first1=John K. |last1=Fairbank |first2=Edwin O. |last2=Reischauer |first3=Albert M. |last3=Craig |title=East Asia: The Modern Transformation |location=Boston |publisher=Houghton Mifflin |year=1965 |pages=501–4 |oclc=13613258 }}</ref>
 
Japan joined the [[Allies of World War I|Allies of the First World War]] to make territorial gains. Together with the British Empire, it divided up Germany's territories scattered in the Pacific and on the [[Coastline of China|Chinese coast]]; they did not amount to very much. The other Allies pushed back hard against Japan's efforts to dominate China through the [[Twenty-One Demands]] of 1915. Its [[Japanese intervention in Siberia|occupation of Siberia]] proved unproductive. Japan's wartime diplomacy and limited military action had produced few results, and at the Paris Versailles peace conference at the end of the war, Japan was frustrated in its ambitions. At the [[Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920)|Paris Peace Conference]] in 1919, its [[Racial Equality Proposal]] led to increasing diplomatic isolation. The 1902 alliance with Britain was not renewed in 1922 because of heavy pressure on Britain from Canada and the United States. In the 1920s Japanese diplomacy was rooted in a largely liberal democratic political system, and favoured internationalism. By 1930, however, Japan was rapidly reversing itself, rejecting democracy at home, as the Army seized more and more power, and rejecting internationalism and liberalism. By the late 1930s it had joined the Axis military alliance with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig" />{{rp|563–612, 666}}
 
In 1930, the London disarmament conference angered the [[Imperial Japanese Armed Forces]]. The [[Imperial Japanese Navy]] demanded parity with the United States, Britain and France, but was rejected and the conference kept the 1921 ratios. Japan was required to scrap a [[capital ship]]. Extremists assassinated Japanese Prime Minister [[Inukai Tsuyoshi]] in the [[May 15 Incident]] and the military took more power, leading to rapid [[democratic backsliding]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Paul W. Doerr|title=British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zumqs15aTfwC&pg=PA120|year=1998|page=120|publisher=Manchester University Press |isbn=9780719046728|access-date=16 March 2018|archive-date=17 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191117110339/https://books.google.com/books?id=Zumqs15aTfwC&pg=PA120|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
==== Japan seizes Manchuria ====
{{Main|Japanese invasion of Manchuria}}
 
In September 1931, the Japanese [[Kwantung Army]]—acting on its own without government approval—[[Japanese invasion of Manchuria|seized control of Manchuria]], an anarchic area that China had not controlled in decades. It created the puppet government of [[Manchukuo]]. Britain and France effectively controlled the League of Nations, which issued the [[Lytton Report]] in 1932, saying that Japan had genuine grievances, but it acted illegally in seizing the entire province. Japan quit the League, and Britain and France took no action. US Secretary of State [[Henry L. Stimson]] announced that the United States would also not recognise Japan's conquest as legitimate. Germany welcomed Japan's actions.<ref>{{cite journal |first=David Wen-wei |last=Chang |title=The Western Powers and Japan's Aggression in China: The League of Nations and 'The Lytton Report' |journal=American Journal of Chinese Studies |year=2003 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=43–63 |jstor=44288722 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Shin'ichi |last=Yamamuro |title=Manchuria under Japanese Dominion |publisher=U. of Pennsylvania Press |year=2006 |postscript=; }} online {{cite journal |title=Review |journal=Journal of Japanese Studies |volume=34 |issue=1 |year=2007 |pages=109–114 |doi=10.1353/jjs.2008.0027 |s2cid=146638943 }}</ref>
 
==== Towards the conquest of China ====
{{Main|Second Sino-Japanese War}}
[[File:First pictures of the Japanese occupation of Peiping in China.jpg|thumb|right|Japanese march into [[Zhengyangmen]] of Beijing after capturing the city in July 1937]]
 
The civilian government in Tokyo tried to minimise the Army's aggression in Manchuria, and announced it was withdrawing. On the contrary, the Army completed the conquest of Manchuria, and the civilian cabinet resigned. The political parties were divided on the issue of military expansion. Prime Minister Tsuyoshi tried to negotiate with China but was assassinated in the May 15 Incident in 1932, which ushered in an era of [[Japanese nationalism|nationalism]] and [[Japanese militarism|militarism]] led by the [[Imperial Japanese Army]] and supported by other right-wing societies. The IJA's nationalism ended civilian rule in Japan until after 1945.<ref>{{cite book |first=James L. |last=Huffman |title=Modern Japan: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YWLhAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA143 |year=2013 |page=143 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-63490-2 |access-date=16 March 2018 |archive-date=13 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191213140338/https://books.google.com/books?id=YWLhAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA143 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
The Army, however, was itself divided into cliques and factions with different strategic viewpoints. One faction viewed the Soviet Union as the main enemy; the other sought to build a mighty empire based in Manchuria and northern China. The Navy, while smaller and less influential, was also factionalised. Large-scale warfare, known as the [[Second Sino-Japanese War]], began in August 1937, with [[Battle of Shanghai|naval and infantry attacks focused on Shanghai]], which quickly spread to other major cities. There were numerous [[Japanese war crimes|large-scale atrocities]] against Chinese civilians, such as the [[Nanjing massacre]] in December 1937, with mass murder and mass rape. By 1939 military lines had stabilised, with Japan in control of almost all of the major Chinese cities and industrial areas. A puppet government was set up.<ref name="FairbankReischauerCraig" />{{rp|589–613}} In the U.S., government and public opinion—even including those who were isolationist regarding Europe—was resolutely opposed to Japan and gave strong support to China. Meanwhile, the Japanese Army fared badly in large battles with the [[Red Army|Soviet Red Army]] in Mongolia at the [[Battles of Khalkhin Gol]] in summer 1939. The USSR was too powerful. Tokyo and Moscow [[Soviet–Japanese Neutrality Pact|signed a nonaggression treaty in April 1941]], as the militarists turned their attention to the European colonies to the south which had urgently-needed oil fields.<ref>{{cite book |first=Herbert |last=Feis |title=The Road to Pearl Harbor: The Coming of the War Between the United States and Japan |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=1960 |pages=8–150 |oclc=394264 }}</ref>
 
=== Latin America ===
Line 194 ⟶ 201:
The contrary ideals of ''[[indigenismo]]'' and ''[[hispanismo]]'' held sway among intellectuals in [[Hispanic America|Spanish-speaking America]] during the interwar period. In Argentina the ''[[gaucho]]'' genre flourished. A rejection of "Western universalist" influences was in vogue across Latin America.<ref name=Goebels/> This last tendency was in part inspired by the translation into Spanish of the book ''[[Decline of the West]]'' in 1923.<ref name=Goebels/>
 
==== Sports ====
Sports became increasingly popular, drawing enthusiastic fans to large stadiums.<ref>{{cite book |editor-first=David M. K. |editor-last=Sheinin |title=Sports Culture in Latin American History |publisher=University of Pittsburgh Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-8229-6337-0 }}</ref> The [[International Olympic Committee]] (IOC) worked to encourage Olympic ideals and participation. Following the 1922 Latin American Games in Rio de Janeiro, the IOC helped to establish national Olympic committees and prepare for future competition. In Brazil, however, sporting and political rivalries slowed progress as opposing factions fought for control of [[international sport]]. The [[1924 Summer Olympics]] in Paris and the [[1928 Summer Olympics]] in Amsterdam had greatly increased participation from Latin American athletes.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Cesar R. |last=Torres |title=The Latin American 'Olympic Explosion' of the 1920s: causes and consequences |journal=International Journal of the History of Sport |volume=23 |issue=7 |year=2006 |pages=1088–111 |doi=10.1080/09523360600832320 |s2cid=144085742 }}</ref>
 
Line 231 ⟶ 238:
 
== End of an era ==
The interwar period ended in September 1939 with the [[Nazi Germany|German]] and [[Soviet Union in World War II|Soviet]] [[invasion of Poland]] and the start of [[World War II]].<ref name=Overy-2016>{{cite book |last=Overy |first=R J |author-link=Richard Overy |title=The Inter-war Crisis, 1919–1939 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=phthPgAACAAJ |edition=2nd revised |year=2015 |publisher=Routledge |location=London, New York |isbn=978-1-1381-379-36 |orig-year=1st pub. 2010:Longman |oclc=949747872 |access-date=11 August 2017 |archive-date=14 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214081806/https://books.google.com/books?id=phthPgAACAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref>
 
== See also ==
Line 276 ⟶ 283:
 
== Notes ==
* For a guide to the reliable sources see Jacobson (1983).<ref>Jon Jacobson, "[https://www.jstor.org/stable/1864590 Is there a New International History of the 1920s?.]". ''American Historical Review'' 88.3 (1983): 617–645 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1864590 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201103225109/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1864590 |date=3 November 2020 }}.</ref>
 
== References ==
Line 282 ⟶ 289:
 
== Further reading ==
* Morris, Richard B. and Graham W. Irwin, eds. ''[[iarchive:harperencycloped00morr|Harper Encyclopedia of the Modern World: A Concise Reference History from 1760 to the Present]]'' (1970) [https://archive.org/details/harperencycloped00morr online]
* Albrecht-Carrié, René. ''A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna'' (1958), 736pp; a basic introduction, 1815–1955 [https://archive.org/details/diplomatichistor0000albr_b4c1 online free to borrow]
* Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and Jeremy Mitchell, eds. ''Authoritarianism and democracy in Europe, 1919–39: Comparative Analyses'' (Springer, 2002).
Line 290 ⟶ 297:
* Cambon, Jules, ed ''The Foreign Policy of the Powers'' (1935) Essays by experts that cover France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.130997 Online free]
* Clark, Linda Darus, ed. ''Interwar America: 1920–1940: Primary Sources in U.S. History'' (2001)
* Cohrs, Patrick O. "The First ‘Real’ Peace Settlements after the First World War: Britain, the United States and the Accords of London and Locarno, 1923–1925." ''Contemporary European History'' 12.1 (2003): 1-31.
* Costigliola, Frank C. ''Awkward dominion: American political, economic, and cultural relations with Europe, 1919–1933'' (Cornell University Press, 2018).
 
* Dailey, Andy, and David G. Williamson. (2012) ''Peacemaking, Peacekeeping: International Relations 1918–36'' (2012) 244 pp; textbook, heavily illustrated with diagrams and contemporary photographs and colour posters.
* Doumanis, Nicholas, ed. ''The Oxford Handbook of European History, 1914–1945'' (Oxford UP, 2016).
Line 295 ⟶ 305:
* Feinstein, Charles H., Peter Temin, and Gianni Toniolo. ''The World Economy Between the World Wars'' (Oxford UP, 2008), a standard scholarly survey.
* Freeman, Robert. ''The InterWar Years (1919–1939)'' (2014), brief survey
* Frieden, Jeff. "Sectoral conflict and foreign economic policy, 1914–1940". ''International Organization'' 42.1 (1988): 59-90; focus on US policy. {{doi|10.1017/S002081830000713X}}.
* Garraty, John A. '' [[iarchive:greatdepressioni0000garr/page/n7/mode/2up|The Great Depression: An Inquiry into the Causes, Course, and Consequences of the Worldwide Depression of the Nineteen-1930s, As Seen by Contemporaries]]'' (1986).
* Gathorne-Hardy, Geoffrey Malcolm. ''A Short History of International Affairs, 1920 to 1934'' (Oxford UP, 1952).
* {{Cite book |last1=Grenville |first1=J. A. S. |title=[[A History of the World in the 20th Century|A History of the World in the Twentieth Century]] |year=2000 |pages=77–254}} [https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%28J%20A%20S%20Grenville%29 Online free to borrow]
Line 313 ⟶ 324:
* {{cite book|last=Meltzer|first=Allan H.|author-link=Allan H. Meltzer|title=A History of the Federal Reserve – Volume 1: 1913–1951|year=2003|publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]|place=Chicago|pages=90–545|isbn=978-0226520001}}
* [[Mowat, C. L.]] ed. (1968). ''The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. 12: The Shifting Balance of World Forces, 1898–1945'' (2nd ed.). – 25 chapters by experts; 845 pp; the first edition (1960) edited by David Thompson has the same title but numerous different chapters.
* Mowat, Charles Loch. ''Britain Between the Wars, 1918–1940'' (1955), 690pp; thorough scholarly coverage; emphasis on politics. {{Webarchive|url=[https://web.archive.org/webdetails/20180624204435britainbetweenwa0000mowa_f7k1/https:page/n8/www.questia.commode/library/705977/britain-between-the-wars-1918-1940 |title=Britain between the Wars, 1918–1940 |author=Charles Loch Mowat|date=24 June 2018 |id =archived exerpt}}; [https://archive.org/details/britainbetweenwa00mowa also1up online free to borrow]
 
* Murray, Williamson and Allan R. Millett, eds. ''Military Innovation in the Interwar Period'' (1998)
* Newman, Sarah, and Matt Houlbrook, eds. ''The Press and Popular Culture in Interwar Europe'' (2015)
Line 320 ⟶ 332:
* Seton-Watson, Hugh. (1945) ''Eastern Europe Between The Wars 1918–1941'' (1945) [https://archive.org/download/in.ernet.dli.2015.183358/2015.183358.Estern-Europe-Between-The-Wars-1918-1941.pdf online]
* {{Cite book |last1=Somervell |first1=D.C. |title=The Reign of King George V |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.176466 |year=1936}} – 550 pp; wide-ranging political, social and economic coverage of Britain, 1910–35
* [[Raymond James Sontag|Sontag, Raymond James.]] ''A Broken World, 1919–1939'' (1972) [https://archive.org/details/brokenworld1919100sont online free to borrow]; wide-ranging survey of European history
* [[Raymond James Sontag|Sontag, Raymond James.]] "Between the Wars." ''Pacific Historical Review'' 29.1 (1960): 1–17 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3636283 online].
* Steiner, Zara. ''The Lights that Failed: European International History 1919–1933''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
* Steiner, Zara. ''The Triumph of the Dark: European International History 1933–1939''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Line 331 ⟶ 342:
=== Historiography ===
* Cornelissen, Christoph, and Arndt Weinrich, eds. ''Writing the Great War – The Historiography of World War I from 1918 to the Present'' (2020) free download; full coverage for major countries.
* Jacobson, Jon. "Is there a New International History of the 1920s?.". ''American Historical Review'' 88.3 (1983): 617–645 online.
* [[Raymond James Sontag|Sontag, Raymond James.]] "Between the Wars.". ''Pacific Historical Review'' 29.1 (1960): 1–17, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/{{JSTOR|3636283 online]}}.
 
=== Primary sources ===
Line 346 ⟶ 358:
{{Financial bubbles}}
{{Financial crises}}
{{Western cultureworld}}
{{Eastern world}}
{{Authority control}}