Content deleted Content added
Cassiopeia (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by 212.55.60.213 (talk): disruptive edits (HG) (3.4.12) |
m Minor gramatical changes |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 3:
{{emotion}}
[[File:Allegory of Pride Met DP888806.jpg|thumb|Allegory of pride, from {{Circa|1590}}–1630, engraving, 22.3 cm × 16.6 cm, in the [[Metropolitan Museum of Art]] (New York City)]]
'''Pride''' is defined by the [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary as "reasonable [[self-esteem]]" or "confidence and satisfaction in oneself".<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pride | title=pride | website=Merriam-Webster | access-date=3 September 2022 | archive-date=3 September 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220903201629/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pride | url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Oxford Dictionary of English|Oxford]] dictionary defines it as "the quality of having an excessively high opinion of oneself or one's own importance."<ref>{{cite book|title=The New Oxford Dictionary of English|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1998}}</ref> Pride may be related to one's own abilities or achievements, positive characteristics of friends or family, or [[National pride|one's country]]. [[Richard Taylor (philosopher)|Richard Taylor]] defined pride as "the justified [[Self-love|love of oneself]]",<ref>{{cite book|last=Taylor|first= Richard|title=Restoring Pride: The Lost Virtue of Our Age|isbn=9781573920247|year=1995|publisher=Prometheus Books}}</ref> as opposed to false pride or [[narcissism]]. Similarly, [[St. Augustine]] defined it as "the love of one's own excellence",<ref>{{cite book|author=[[Augustine of Hippo]] |url=http://freespace.virgin.net/angus.graham/DeAmore4.htm |title=De amore|volume=IV |access-date=9 November 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081105090845/http://freespace.virgin.net/angus.graham/DeAmore4.htm |archive-date=5 November 2008|quote=Est autem superbia amor proprie excellentie, et fuit initium peccati superbia.|lang=la }}</ref> and [[Meher Baba]] called it "the specific feeling through which [[egoism]] manifests."<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Meher Baba|last=Baba|first=Meher|year=1967|title=Discourses|volume=2|location=San Francisco|publisher=Sufism Reoriented|page=72|isbn=978-1880619094}}.</ref>
[[Philosopher]]s and [[social psychology|social psychologists]] have noted that pride is a complex secondary emotion that requires the development of a [[sense of self]] and the mastery of relevant conceptual distinctions (e.g. that pride is distinct from happiness and joy) through language-based interaction with others.<ref name="Sullivan">{{cite journal | last1 = Sullivan | first1 = G.B. | year = 2007 | title = Wittgenstein and the grammar of pride: The relevance of philosophy to studies of self-evaluative emotions | journal = New Ideas in Psychology | volume = 25 | issue = 3| pages = 233–252 | doi = 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.03.003 }}</ref> Some social psychologists identify the nonverbal expression of pride as a means of sending a functional, automatically perceived signal of high social status.<ref name="Shariff">{{cite journal |last1=Shariff |first1=Azim F. |last2=Tracy |first2=Jessica L. |title=Knowing who's boss: Implicit perceptions of status from the nonverbal expression of pride |journal=Emotion |year=2009 |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=631–639 |doi=10.1037/a0017089 |pmid=19803585 }}</ref>
Pride may be considered the opposite of [[shame]] or of [[humility]],<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/pride |title=PRIDE synonyms |website=Merriam-Webster |access-date=2023-12-01}}</ref> sometimes as proper or as a [[virtue]]
While some philosophers such as [[Aristotle]] (and [[George Bernard Shaw]]) consider pride (but not hubris) a profound [[virtue]], some world [[religion]]s consider pride's fraudulent form<ref>{{Citation |title=LGBTQ |date=2024-10-21 |work=Wikipedia |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ |access-date=2024-10-24 |language=en}}</ref> a [[sin]],
==Etymology==
Line 15:
== Ancient Greek philosophy ==
[[Aristotle]] identified pride ({{transliteration|grc|megalopsuchia}}, variously translated as proper pride, the greatness of soul and magnanimity)<ref>{{cite book|title=[[Nicomachean Ethics]]|author=[[Aristotle]]|at=[https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/aristotle/nicomachean-ethics/f-h-peters/text/book-4#chapter-4-1-2 IV.2–3]}}</ref> as the crown of the virtues, distinguishing it from vanity, temperance
{{blockquote|By a high-minded man we seem to mean one who claims much and deserves much: for he who claims much without deserving it is a fool; but the possessor of a virtue is never foolish or silly. The man we have described, then, is high-minded. He who deserves little and claims little is temperate [or modest], but not high-minded: for high-mindedness [or greatness of soul] implies greatness, just as beauty implies stature; small men may be neat and well proportioned, but cannot be called beautiful.<ref name=TNE4.3>{{cite book|title=[[Nicomachean Ethics]]|author=[[Aristotle]]|at=[https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/aristotle/nicomachean-ethics/f-h-peters/text/book-4#chapter-4-1-3 IV.3]}}</ref>}}
He concludes then that,
{{blockquote|High-mindedness, then, seems to be the crowning grace, as it were, of the virtues; it makes them greater, and cannot exist without them. And on this account it is a hard thing to be truly high-minded; for it is impossible without the union of all the virtues.{{r|TNE4.3}} }}
Line 27:
== Psychology ==
Pride, when classified as an emotion or passion, is both cognitive and evaluative; its object, that
=== Emotion ===
Line 61:
Terry Cooper describes excessive pride (along with low self-esteem) as an important framework in which to describe the human condition. He examines and compares the [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustinian]]-[[Reinhold Niebuhr|Niebuhrian]] conviction that pride is primary, the feminist concept of pride as being absent in the experience of women, the [[humanistic psychology]] position that pride does not adequately account for anyone's experience, and the humanistic psychology idea that if pride emerges, it is always a false front designed to protect an undervalued self.{{r|Cooper2003}}
He considers that the work of certain neo-Freudian psychoanalysts, namely [[Karen Horney]], and
Cooper refers to their work in describing the connection between religious and psychological pride as well as sin to describe how a neurotic pride system underlies an appearance of self-contempt and low self-esteem:
<blockquote>
|