Content deleted Content added
→Exclude: Per YFNS |
Animalparty (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 774:
# I read the discussions above and feel that given the source interrogation presented by YFNS ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cass_Review#c-Your_Friendly_Neighborhood_Sociologist-20241015194400-Void_if_removed-20241014211700| here]) leaves a lot to doubt about the source's quality. That said, much of the discussion concerned [[WP:MEDRS]] and [[WP:MEDASSESS]] in relation to [[WP:FRINGE]] and [[WP:DUE]]. I think the participants at [[WP:MED]] would be the natural next step for seeking input. I also did not see a detailed proposal as to the content for it were included, but I saw several proposals for how it could be weaved together onto what is currently on the page, which seems like putting the cart before the horse. [[User:Relmcheatham|Relm]] ([[User talk:Relmcheatham|talk]]) 10:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
# Per the very in-depth analysis of the source by @[[User:Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist|Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist]] and it's lack of [[WP:INDEPENDENCE]] at the related thread at [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#c-Your_Friendly_Neighborhood_Sociologist-20241027153200-FirstPrimeOfApophis-20241026093400]]. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 20:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Just to be clear, you're placing the opinion of one Wikipedian over the peer-reviewed editorial judgment of a reliable scholarly journal. Like amateur Wikipedans know science better than the science journals themselves? [[User:Animalparty|--Animalparty!]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]) 21:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
====Discussion====
| |||
