Narayanese

Joined 26 April 2006

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Narayanese (talk | contribs) at 07:33, 12 March 2021 (Unhelpful?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 3 years ago by Narayanese in topic Unhelpful?

Hello there!

Just so you know, an IP made a couple of edits to your user page that I don't think you would've allowed, so I reverted them. They haven't made any other edits with that IP though, so I don't know what their motive is. But anyway, just thought I'd let you know! Cubs197 04:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also, they left this on your page "Vi är tillbaka! Missade du oss?" which translates to "We are back! Did you miss us?". It seems that you have had an issue in the past with some vandals. If it continues, I would suggest contacting an administrator by placing {{Admin help}} on your talk page to get assistance. Cubs197 04:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Narayanese (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Referenda

Per your recent edit summary. It is incorrect to say that all referenda are non-binding. The referendum on the alternative vote was binding because the enabling act of parliament specifically said so (and it was parliament that passed the act). --Elektrik Fanne 14:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you say so, I'll trust you on that. I'm not keen on going through the referendum act, so as long as BBC's work of doing so is good enough... Narayanese (talk) 14:33, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I'm actually trusting a couple of sources including a piece by a consitutional lawyer (whatever that really is) in the Finacial Times. I have not had a look at the actual Act itself. --Elektrik Fanne 14:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Ireland outline.png

 

Thank you for uploading File:Ireland outline.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Can you nominate capture of Qayyarah for ITN

Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Obaidi today declared that Qayyarah has been captured. It's capture isthe part of Mosul offensive (2016). Qayyarah is an oil-producing region and an its capture is strategically important for capture of Mosul. I think it's capture is worth for being included in ITN but I can't figure out how to nominate it. I know you nominated capture of Manbij earlier. Can you nominate Qayyarah as well? Thanks a lot. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Narayanese. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Open access journal

Hi, Would you be interested in being an editor for the WikiJournal of Science? It's a journal modelled on the successful Wikipedia-integrated academic journal: WikiJournal of Medicine. Currently several physicists have joined the editorial board, but it is hoped that the journal will be open to all STEM topics. It'd mostly involve inviting articles and organising peer review. Anyway, let me know if it's the sort of thing that might interest you (Relevant short letter in Science). T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 00:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Narayanese. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Narayanese. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

Hi Narayanese. I'm contacting to ask whether there are any Wikipedia articles you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and having submitted for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, they are a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

The WP:WikiJournal article nominations page should allow simple submission of existing Wikipedia pages for external review. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nothing at the moment, thanks for the info. Narayanese (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Hope you find the idea interesting, and you're welcome to drop by if you ever have something in mind. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 23:38, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:SiRNA structure 2.jpg

 

The file File:SiRNA structure 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unhelpful?

Could you please explain why this edit was unhelpful? –Kammilltalk07:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Let me finish building the page instead of attack me and it. I know what elements a new page should have. And it'd would have been a bad introduction if I'd been a new user. Less drivebys please. Narayanese (talk) 07:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Narayanese, neither I attacked you nor the page. I added those templates so that the page may be improved. –Kammilltalk07:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
OK. If you say so. Narayanese (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply