Valereee

Joined 17 March 2006

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Valereee (talk | contribs) at 20:40, 26 October 2024 (Thank you: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 1 day ago by Valereee in topic Thank you

Need help and don't know where to find it? Help!

Gourmand Cookbook Award

I came across this award reviewing a draft and it appears to be a notable award mentioned in several articles. Thought you might be interested in creating an article. See also es:Gourmand World Cookbook Awards. S0091 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hm, it has an entry in 8 language wikis. Definitely seems worth investigating, thanks! Valereee (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

More India

This video [1] is about the current court-thing, but at ca 12:50 he (Nikhil Pahwa) mentions the older "map-thing", I thought it was interesting. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've been really interested in that case. If the choice is between identifying editors and being blocked by India, I'd choose being blocked by India every time. Is Asian_News_International#Lawsuit_against_Wikipedia really all we have on that? Seems like it ought to be an article. Valereee (talk) 12:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Per "This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:" on the talkpage, you can probably make an article about it. Perhaps the topic fits at Censorship of Wikipedia? I don't remember if some minister threatened blocking about the map. And yes, if they want to block, let them block. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Like I said in 2020:[2] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Draft:ANI vs. Wikipedia. Unfortunately many of the sources are behind paywalls for me, but if you can get to them, feel free! Valereee (talk) 12:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Now we're waiting for media-coverage on that article... Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, and hoping we don't get some judge demanding WMF tell ANI who I am so they can sue me. :) Valereee (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
YES!!! Wasn't really expecting Delhi High Court-coverage, though. Interesting. That was a crazy idea for an article you had, I obviously had nothing to do with it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
[3]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
ANI has accused you of "pressurising the Ld. Single Judge". And, the Chief Justice of the Court appears to be quite sympathetic to the accusation. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't think I've seen this much media-coverage so quickly on a WP-article since Recession. Hope you're holding up. I don't think I've started a WP-article that got media-coverage... Yes I have! Catherine Nakalembe said on a BBC interview "Imagine, I now have a Wikipedia page." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I don't typically write or even edit articles that get media coverage. Honestly I'm just kind of bemused. This is all stuff widely published in reliable sources. How is this subjudice disclosure or pressuring a judge by Wikipedia if it wasn't by the dozen sources we're citing? I'm trying to decide whether it's just grandstanding on the parts of the judges? Valereee (talk) 19:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
If I understand it correctly, as the judges see it, you, me, text on WP, are reps of WMF, so the article is WMF:s attempt to influence the trial, and that is naughty. BOLD doesn't exist in their world, the publication of your article was decided by WMF in advance. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I think I understand...they're saying that because WMF is a party, WMF shouldn't be discussing. They don't realize that WMF didn't discuss. Valereee (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
That poor lawyer! Restrain your client! Valereee (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do feel sorry for him. Coming into court and having the judges slamming the ANI vs WMF article in his face can't have been much fun. But if you hadn't started it, I or someone else probably would have. The sources are there, and it's interesting. There might be some discussion on this in the talk-section of the next Signpost, we'll see. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
This writer does realize that, it's encouraging: [4] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
So, the article was mentioned by court, then taken down by WMF. That's quite a distinction. Category:Wikipedia Office-protected pages Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am all agog! Valereee (talk) 08:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I did not expect that. This conversation may or may not interest you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Btw, if you make a "An article I started/edited has been WP:BLACKLOCKED!!" userbox, let me know. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
hahaha...my proudest achievement. Valereee (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Seeing a Streisand Effect on this...every paper that has covered the issue at all over the past several weeks has released a story in the past few hours. How long do you think it'll be before it gets picked up outside of India? Valereee (talk) 09:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm a little disappointed it hasn't, hence my gentle prodding of SH. And many many papers quotes what WP says about ANI too. If you see a good source (not reddit), add it to List_of_Streisand_effect_examples#India. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not about India, but good for him. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Block of 70.83.133.243

Thanks for your block of 70.83.133.243 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). If you look at the history at Walking with Dinosaurs (film) you'll find numerous IPs all doing similar edits with the same (invalid) edit summary. Don't know if more blocks might be appropriate, but wanted to flag. --ZimZalaBim talk 21:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2024)

Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

Image

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Longshore drift • Navy


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request

Hello Valereee, I hope you're doing well. I recently moved the Imphal Airport Wikipedia page to Bir Tirkendrajit International Airport, but I accidentally used the incorrect spelling. The correct title should be Bir Tikendrajit International Airport, which reflects the official name of the airport. Unfortunately, I am unable to correct the move myself due to system restrictions. Could you kindly move the page to the correct title: Bir Tikendrajit International Airport? Thank you very much for your help and time! Best regards, AstuteFlicker (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

RFC Jewish Chronicle

Thanks for closing the Jewish Chronicle RFC, given the contentious nature and heat of some recent RSN discussions all closes are much appreciated. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 21:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, AD. I tried to be very careful, literally put together a spreadsheet. Valereee (talk) 21:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm not surprised, it was a complicated RFC and even if I did closes it would be one I would've avoided. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 22:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

World Health Organization

Hi, I have added a sentence on the Italy page; could you please help me format the source correctly? JacktheBrown (talk) 04:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

So when this happens, look at the source again and see if you can figure it out the citation info. In this case, there was an easy way: click on 'download citation', then on 'plain text', it even allows you to copy. Then all you have to do is enter the information manually in the correct format, which in VisEd on a laptop is easy. No idea about using a mobile device. I've fixed that one. Valereee (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI

Hello, Valereee,

In your second comment in your closure of a discussion at ANI, I think you are missing a word or two in the sentence. It's like you are starting to issue a warning but then the sentence just ends without you completing the thought. I don't disagree with your closure but it just seems like the second part of the closure is missing a word or phrase. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hm, I meant 'please note when you're involved' as 'when you're involved, please note that'. But I just saw someone else not interpreting it that way, too. I've revised, can you take a look? (Also hm...I didn't underscore/strike, just revised...that okay, you think?) Valereee (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

Good close! Thank you! Bishonen | tålk 20:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC).Reply

Thanks! Valereee (talk) 20:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply