Wikipedia:Requested moves

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandrocozzi (talk | contribs) at 17:49, 25 May 2007 ([[25 May]] [[2007]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.

Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.

Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
  • Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Uncontroversial proposals

Only list here proposals that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list and use {{subst:WP:RM2|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required.

If you object to a proposal listed here, please relist it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.




Incomplete and contested proposals

If a requested move is incomplete (not all steps of the procedure are followed), or if there are reasonable objections to an "uncontroversial" proposal, it will be listed here until it is requested in full or five days pass. Upon completion of a request, please move the entry to the top of the "other proposals" section. Please place new entries at the top of this list, and sign (~~~~) or put a timestamp (~~~~~) at the end.


Other proposals

Full listing. Moving to dated section. Dekimasuよ! 09:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Consolidated city-countymetropolitan government —(Discuss)—I do not believe that the redirect from metropolitan government as a Consolidated city-county is a type of metropolitan government. I believe that this page should be moved to, or split into metropolitan government.The current title makes this form of government seem more exclusive than it is. Especially the part about it being exclusive to America. There are metropolitan governments in Canada, specifically Toronto. The page should be expanded to show that metropolitan governments are not exclusive to America, and that they can be in more forms than just City-County.--Bballoakie t/c 09:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eldorado, A SymphonyEldorado (album) —(Discuss)— The proper title of this album is simply "Eldorado" and as they are other Eldorado articles in this English Wikipedia, the naming convention would make the album fall under "Eldorado (album)." I have no idea why this album is currently under "Eldorado, A Symphony." No website out there refers to the album as this. —Douglasr007 21:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • CORAL 66 programming languageCoral 66 —(Discuss)— The descriptor "programming language" is not part of the language's name, and is not needed for disambiguation; if it were, brackets would be required. The target page is a redirect to the article, but has one edit (the insertion of a space before 66 to bypass another redirect), which is why I can't move the page myself. Additionally, although some sources use upper case for the name, 'The Official Definition of Coral 66' uses title case throughout (except on the front cover, where the whole title is in upper case). —Grant 11:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]