Reisio
Suppose.
Serval range map
I’ve uploaded a redrawn version at File:Serval_range.svg; let me know if you think it needs any revisions before I call it Done and substitute it for the one in the article.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Another reply
Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia:Village Pump (technical)'s talk page. (Sorry for the second notification, but it sounded like maybe you weren't going to check that talk page anymore.) - dcljr (talk) 23:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot of Firefox
Hello, Reisio
Your persistence to remove the name of the operating system from Firefox caption surprises me: While there is an entire discussion dedicated to choosing between the screenshots from different platforms, you claim that they are all similar? Well, I am sorry, your claim does not seem to have community consensus. Everyone participating in that discussion seems to think they are different.
In addition, what is the harm of a little more detail? In fact I think the name of the OS should be mentioned even if there is absolutely no difference between the screenshots of the same software program in different OSes because there is no telling what happens in the future.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 21:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- If the discussion is on which screenshot to use and not on whether or not to mention which OS the screenshot originated from at all, then it’s not relevant to my actions. I claim they’re similar because they are; it’s not a matter of opinion, the parts of the screenshot relevant to the article are demonstrably the same regardless of what OS the screenshot came from. ¦ Reisio (talk) 04:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi.
You claim that they are similar, then a discussion that prove the contrary is perfectly appropriate. Nevertheless, an article must answer all essential questions on the subject, including "if it is Firefox, why doesn't it look like what I have on my computer?" instead of denying them with an offensive attitude. So, if you met someone in person who punched you when you told him this screenshot is that of Firefox and called you a liar, don't be surprised.
For now, I drop the matter.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Discussions are usually appropriate when two people aren’t in agreement, and we’ve just had one (two if you count the edit summaries). If a person has Firefox on their computer, they already know what it looks like; and while, again, all relevant properties of what the screenshots depict will look the same, additional information relevant to the image (but not the article) are always (or at least frequently) available by clicking on it (something which the end user clearly has the capacity to do). Text doesn’t have attitude, it’s just pixels making up glyphs, but I appreciate your warning and if it gives you peace of mind, rest assured the actions of humans have little surprise left in them for me. ¦ Reisio (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Result of discussion: Firefox Proposal
I have just closed the unofficial request for change I started in proxy for you, as consensus was reached not to enforce your suggested change. If you should wish to contest this conclusion, you may open an official request for change here and invite other editors from relevant wikiprojects. You may also open a discussion at a wikiproject talk page if you feel your change should be adopted on a project-wide basis. If you you choose to take action to contest our conclusion, I would suggest asking for other peoples' opinions at Wikipedia:Software screenshots, and at Wikiproject Software. drewmunn (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:PS/2 connector#.22...almost_all_desktop_computers_still_have_PS.2F2_ports.....22".
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 05:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
ANI noticeHello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Appalling POV merging by Emmette Hernandez Coleman of Flag of WS/Flag of the SADR. Thank you. —Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC) No personal attacksHello, Reisio. You have new messages at El duderino's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2013_February_19. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I've already asked you twice to let it drop, then removed your personal attack twice. If you restore it again I will seek admin action. El duderino (abides) 01:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move?There's a discussion you might be interested in at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move?. I'm telling you this because you were involved in Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#Merger proposal and/or Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#UNMERGING_ARTICLES. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Clojure-icon.png)Thanks for uploading File:Clojure-icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC) That wasn't very niceAnna Frodesiak (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
YOu know perfectly well how to post at someone's talk. Use talkback or the like. Posting my signature like that gives the appearance that I started that thread at my talk and you replied. Looking at your history, I suggest that you make edits that are in better form. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Smartphones with no specified providerHi Reisio, I responded to you in the thread on the Computing refdesk. I'm not being argumentative — if it's possible to do what you say I'd genuinely be grateful to know how. Can you point me to anything on how to buy a smartphone without a specified provider? I'm in the US in case it matters. --Trovatore (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC) This Is What I Am DoingI have a wikidoc E-mail address of the guy. And I know the guys name. I tried a reverse E-mail check. ON something like E-mail finder. I was only able to undercover the town of the person with the E-mail account. Not the state. I can possiablely look is other E-mail account up. By paying with a credit or debit card. Its legal I am not breaking the law. I am asking would there be a free way to do it. A reverse E-mail look up there a many sites that do it. But they all charge. Could I do it for free some how. Without breaking the law. Look through reverse E-mail on Yahoo or google. If you want to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.174.186.165 (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
EM SpaceThis is just my curiosity, but why are you using EM-SPACE (%E2%80%83)? It looks incredibly strange when reading Wikipedia/the Refdesk, even more-so than the non-breaking space (U+00A0) when trying to force doublespacing after a period. Again, just my curiosity. Thanks! -- 143.85.199.242 (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at HTML element. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.
You're simply wrong here.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Hard return. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A dubious, inaccurate article with no sources that has been labelled as such for several years is hardly "drive-by tagging". It would be much more useful to address this problem than to start replicating its errors into other articles. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Edit warringEdit warring on ITo avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC) ANI-noticeHello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Reverts on Basic Latin alphabet and A, B, C, etc.Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Basic Latin alphabet, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". WP:MINOR, which you cited as rationale for marking your edits as minor, says that "Adding or removing content in an article" is not minor, and "Reverting a page is not likely to be considered minor under most circumstances". You did both these things by repeatedly clearing this page. LjL (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC) WarningHi, please desist from edit warring on articles to do with letters of the alphabet. Engage in discussion with other editors. And do not mark edits that change content as minor (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). If you cannot do this, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Regards, --RA (talk) 23:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22ndGreetings! Seeing that you've edited the article on Gainesville on Wikipedia, I'm inviting to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville,. If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL. Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2013 (UTC) June 2013To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Randykitty (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Randykitty (talk) 10:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Thomas.W (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W (talk) 06:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
|