Home
Random
Nearby
Log in
Settings
Donate
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Search
Viewing filter 879: Possible malformed edit
Home
Recent filter changes
Examine past edits
Edit filter log
Editing filter 879 (see also a
graph
of recent actions)
Filter parameters
Filter ID:
879
Description:
(publicly viewable)
Filter hits:
943 hits
Conditions:
(
documentation
)
!"confirmed" in user_groups & page_namespace == 0 & "<" in added_lines & !"<" in added_lines & "<" in removed_lines & !"<" in removed_lines
!"confirmed" in user_groups & page_namespace == 0 & "<" in added_lines & !"<" in added_lines & "<" in removed_lines & !"<" in removed_lines
Notes:
Background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/Requested/Archive_10#Warn_about_broken_proxies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard/Archive_3#Move_Special:AbuseFilter.2F879_to_disallow.2C_or_tag.3F Requested filter, tested at 773 (and improved on by Crow). See also 464 --TNT 11/11/2017 This should happen with one edit, so going off of added/removed_lines should do the job and is less expensive. It's possible a user only replaced one part of the page (on purpose), but this seems like an edge case and is likely to be disruptive anyway. Also check added_lines first, which in this case is most likely to evaluate to false. Finally, adding < and > for good measure ~MA no hits for a while, disabled - 1 Mar 2018 --zz
Flags:
Hide details of this filter from public view
Enable this filter
I understand that details of this filter will be hidden from users who cannot see [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format#Protected_variables protected variables]
Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:
18:33, 16 January 2020
by
Zzuuzz
(
talk
|
contribs
)
History:
View this filter's history
Tools:
Export this filter to another wiki
{"data":{"rules":"!\"confirmed\" in user_groups \u0026\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n\"\u0026lt;\" in added_lines \u0026\r\n!\"\u003C\" in added_lines \u0026\r\n\"\u003C\" in removed_lines \u0026\r\n!\"\u0026lt;\" in removed_lines","name":"Possible malformed edit","comments":"Background:\r\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/Requested/Archive_10#Warn_about_broken_proxies\r\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter_noticeboard/Archive_3#Move_Special:AbuseFilter.2F879_to_disallow.2C_or_tag.3F\r\n\r\nRequested filter, tested at 773 (and improved on by Crow). See also 464 --TNT 11/11/2017\r\n\r\nThis should happen with one edit, so going off of added/removed_lines should do the job and is less expensive. It's possible a user only replaced one part of the page (on purpose), but this seems like an edge case and is likely to be disruptive anyway. Also check added_lines first, which in this case is most likely to evaluate to false. Finally, adding \u003C and \u003E for good measure ~MA\r\n\r\nno hits for a while, disabled - 1 Mar 2018 --zz","group":"default","actions":{"warn":["abusefilter-warning-malformed"]},"enabled":false,"deleted":true,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"warn":["abusefilter-warning-malformed"]}}
Actions to take when matched
Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit
Number of actions to allow:
Period of time (in seconds):
Group throttle by:
user
See
the documentation on mediawiki.org
.
Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning
System message to use for warning:
abusefilter-warning
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Prevent the user from performing the action in question
System message to use for disallowing:
abusefilter-disallowed
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status
Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories
Tags to apply:
(see
Wikipedia:Tags
for use and formatting)
(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)
(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)
Require the user to complete a CAPTCHA in order to proceed with the action. Users with permission to skip a CAPTCHA are exempt.