Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
fixing link
Line 524:
:::Looking specifically at the F10 article, I do not see edits by 1292simon that rise to the level of edit warring. Or, if they do, then U1Quattro is even more guilty of edit warring with their greater number of reverts. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 14:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
:::: I note that at the G30 article, U1Quattro added a large chunk of unsourced material, 1292simon reverted it pointing out why, and U1 re-inserted it, claiming that removing it was "disruptive editing" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_5_Series_%28G30%29&type=revision&diff=963508141&oldid=963488374]. That doesn't look great, to be honest. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 18:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
:::* 1292simon here. Regarding the [[BMW 3 Series (E36)|other article]] where the accusation is "content was removed without reason", I made a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_3_Series_(E36)&diff=963894497963189140&oldid=963189140963189104 dummy edit] straight after the one in question, in order to add an Edit Summary (fat finger error... IIRC I accidentally pressed the Enter key instead of Shift key when at the start of typing in an Edit Summary). It's pretty obvious what happened, so U1Quattro probably knows this and is just trying to score a point here. Cheers, [[User:1292simon|1292simon]] ([[User talk:1292simon|talk]]) 21:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 
:::::{{U|Black Kite}} the material was properly sourced and sources were present in the article, infact at the end of the section. Three sources were present. You're taking assumptions without even reading the sources.[[User:U1Quattro|<span style="color:darkgreen;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #a6a6a6">U<sup>1</sup> <sub>q</sub>uattro</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:U1Quattro|<span style="color:green;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #"><small>''TALK''</small></span>]] 02:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)