User talk:Buevell

November 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Latifa Al Maktoum (disambiguation), while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It was noticed that in your edits to this page an important word 'forcibly' was intentionally removed twice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latifa_Al_Maktoum_%28disambiguation%29&diff=1127073264&oldid=1126728448

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latifa_Al_Maktoum_%28disambiguation%29&diff=1125948350&oldid=1088804484

Please do not remove such factual details and refer to relevant article for citations.  Ohsin  16:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mvqr (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV

The article Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I am adding references, its my first page thats why i need much time to complete the task Buevell (talk) 17:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV, without adding a reliable source. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If this was a mistake, don't worry, it has been replaced. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Mvqr (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I just need some minutes, I will add reference, dont worry Buevell (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV, you may be blocked from editing. Mvqr (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvqr (talk) 17:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Sheikh Rashid bin Humaid Al Nuaimi IV, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I have added a reference. Also, I put some information to this page. Whats wrong with it? I need some time Buevell (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced editions

Your edits to the page Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan are unsourced so will be reverted. If you want to add something please provide "reliable sources" and do not use data from Arabic Wikipedia. Egeymi (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Why are you insisting on adding unsourced information. --Egeymi (talk) 13:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Egeymi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. it is last warning Egeymi (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khalid Al Qassimi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sultan bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, you may be blocked from editing. Egeymi (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moza bint Hilal Al Nahyan. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Please unblock me. I didn't add anything wrong to it. I just added his ancestors name according to wikipedia information. Unblock me. Please pardon my mistake. I will remember this issue while editing. Buevell (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I didn't want to vandalise pages, just gathered informations. Please unblock me Buevell (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buevell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have a request to unblock me . I didn't add anything wrong to pages. I just added informations what I gained from wikipedia pages. Please pardon my mistake. I will remember to add sources while editing. Please unblock me. I can assure that I will enrich Wikipedia with my knowledge.

Decline reason:

Strange though it may seem, Wikipedia itself isn't a reliable source. See WP:RS. Yamla (talk) 21:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buevell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes I have understood mistakes happened according to some rules of wikipedia, but I didn't want to do that. I am not much old here, I edited only few pages according to my sources, yes I forgot to add additional links. I didn't have any intentions to vandalise Wikipedia. Please pardon my mistake and give me another chance. I solely request you to unblock me. I will not do the same mistake again Buevell (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate a well sourced edit you would make to an article of your choosing by observing the following process: This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Reading our guide to improving articles.
• Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

• 1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
     • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buevell. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 16:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)