User talk:KingBozzyBoz59

Welcome!

Hello, KingBozzyBoz59! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 23:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you very much!! KingBozzyBoz59 (talk) 01:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clemson Tigers football statistical leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trevor Lawrence. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Shula

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chris Shula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FalconK (talk) 05:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aubrey Pleasant

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aubrey Pleasant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FalconK (talk) 05:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Johnny Juzang appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Sports transactions

Hello, I'm Natg 19. Your recent edit appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Natg 19 (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jordan Hawkins, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! GPL93 (talk) 04:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kearis Jackson, you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ąžuolas Tubelis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Bagumba (talk) 07:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SAIC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

KingBozzyBoz59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is not a sockpuppet account. This is an alternate account that is being used to purely edit sports transactions and to update American political organizations. I realize there are times that a transaction breaks and I jump the gun too early but this is no reason to block me due to these instances. As I have written in my bio, I apologized to all sports administrators for the times I have edited early while forgetting to properly cite my sources. This is a recurring habit of mine that I actively try to fix, but have not fully succeeded at accomplishing yet. I am also aware that in times of past, I made stupid choices and in no way am I trying to hide from them. I fully accept the consequences of my actions and understand now, after fully reading the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations, that I was in the wrong and that my status as an editor on Wikipedia was tarnished due to my ego taking control. However, I have sought to clean up my act and become a better Wikipedia editor within the sports community, which based off of your profile page, is something you administrate very heavily and I applaud you for trying to make Wikipedia a safer community. The block you just put on me for 48 hours is a reasonable block in every sense of the argument (I will not disagree on that, and am fully attentive to my actions), but to permanently block me from editing Wikipedia ever again in the future is a step too far and for that reason, I am appealing this decision. If I lose this appeal, I will understand your reasoning for permanently blocking me. However, I love to edit Wikipedia when it comes to sports and it is a big part of my daily life to be involved in the editing community and to do this as a side hobby. Taking this away from me would be devastating to me because I spend so much of my time here and quite often contribute to various sports articles, whether it be updates, creations of articles or just overall editing. I just would like to ask for a second chance and hope that in the future, we can form a successful partnership in the sports community, if that is possible.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is not a sockpuppet account. This is an alternate account that is being used to purely edit sports transactions and to update American political organizations. I realize there are times that a transaction breaks and I jump the gun too early but this is no reason to block me due to these instances. As I have written in my bio, I apologized to all sports administrators for the times I have edited early while forgetting to properly cite my sources. This is a recurring habit of mine that I actively try to fix, but have not fully succeeded at accomplishing yet. I am also aware that in times of past, I made stupid choices and in no way am I trying to hide from them. I fully accept the consequences of my actions and understand now, after fully reading the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations, that I was in the wrong and that my status as an editor on Wikipedia was tarnished due to my ego taking control. However, I have sought to clean up my act and become a better Wikipedia editor within the sports community, which based off of your profile page, is something you administrate very heavily and I applaud you for trying to make Wikipedia a safer community. The block you just put on me for 48 hours is a reasonable block in every sense of the argument (I will not disagree on that, and am fully attentive to my actions), but to permanently block me from editing Wikipedia ever again in the future is a step too far and for that reason, I am appealing this decision. If I lose this appeal, I will understand your reasoning for permanently blocking me. However, I love to edit Wikipedia when it comes to sports and it is a big part of my daily life to be involved in the editing community and to do this as a side hobby. Taking this away from me would be devastating to me because I spend so much of my time here and quite often contribute to various sports articles, whether it be updates, creations of articles or just overall editing. I just would like to ask for a second chance and hope that in the future, we can form a successful partnership in the sports community, if that is possible. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is not a sockpuppet account. This is an alternate account that is being used to purely edit sports transactions and to update American political organizations. I realize there are times that a transaction breaks and I jump the gun too early but this is no reason to block me due to these instances. As I have written in my bio, I apologized to all sports administrators for the times I have edited early while forgetting to properly cite my sources. This is a recurring habit of mine that I actively try to fix, but have not fully succeeded at accomplishing yet. I am also aware that in times of past, I made stupid choices and in no way am I trying to hide from them. I fully accept the consequences of my actions and understand now, after fully reading the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations, that I was in the wrong and that my status as an editor on Wikipedia was tarnished due to my ego taking control. However, I have sought to clean up my act and become a better Wikipedia editor within the sports community, which based off of your profile page, is something you administrate very heavily and I applaud you for trying to make Wikipedia a safer community. The block you just put on me for 48 hours is a reasonable block in every sense of the argument (I will not disagree on that, and am fully attentive to my actions), but to permanently block me from editing Wikipedia ever again in the future is a step too far and for that reason, I am appealing this decision. If I lose this appeal, I will understand your reasoning for permanently blocking me. However, I love to edit Wikipedia when it comes to sports and it is a big part of my daily life to be involved in the editing community and to do this as a side hobby. Taking this away from me would be devastating to me because I spend so much of my time here and quite often contribute to various sports articles, whether it be updates, creations of articles or just overall editing. I just would like to ask for a second chance and hope that in the future, we can form a successful partnership in the sports community, if that is possible. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is not a sockpuppet account. This is an alternate account that is being used to purely edit sports transactions and to update American political organizations. I realize there are times that a transaction breaks and I jump the gun too early but this is no reason to block me due to these instances. As I have written in my bio, I apologized to all sports administrators for the times I have edited early while forgetting to properly cite my sources. This is a recurring habit of mine that I actively try to fix, but have not fully succeeded at accomplishing yet. I am also aware that in times of past, I made stupid choices and in no way am I trying to hide from them. I fully accept the consequences of my actions and understand now, after fully reading the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations, that I was in the wrong and that my status as an editor on Wikipedia was tarnished due to my ego taking control. However, I have sought to clean up my act and become a better Wikipedia editor within the sports community, which based off of your profile page, is something you administrate very heavily and I applaud you for trying to make Wikipedia a safer community. The block you just put on me for 48 hours is a reasonable block in every sense of the argument (I will not disagree on that, and am fully attentive to my actions), but to permanently block me from editing Wikipedia ever again in the future is a step too far and for that reason, I am appealing this decision. If I lose this appeal, I will understand your reasoning for permanently blocking me. However, I love to edit Wikipedia when it comes to sports and it is a big part of my daily life to be involved in the editing community and to do this as a side hobby. Taking this away from me would be devastating to me because I spend so much of my time here and quite often contribute to various sports articles, whether it be updates, creations of articles or just overall editing. I just would like to ask for a second chance and hope that in the future, we can form a successful partnership in the sports community, if that is possible. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}