Jump to content

Coherent topology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Definition: minor clarification
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Topology determined by family of subspaces}}
In [[topology]], a '''coherent topology''' is a [[topology]] that is uniquely determined by a family of [[subspace topology|subspace]]s. Loosely speaking, a [[topological space]] is coherent with a family of subspaces if it is a ''topological union'' of those subspaces. It is also sometimes called the '''weak topology''' generated by the family of subspaces, a notion that is quite different from the notion of a weak topology generated by a set of maps.<ref>Willard, p. 69</ref>
In [[topology]], a '''coherent topology''' is a [[topology]] that is uniquely determined by a family of [[Subspace topology|subspace]]s. Loosely speaking, a [[topological space]] is coherent with a family of subspaces if it is a ''topological union'' of those subspaces. It is also sometimes called the '''weak topology''' generated by the family of subspaces, a notion that is quite different from the notion of a [[weak topology]] generated by a set of maps.<ref>Willard, p. 69</ref>


==Definition==
== Definition ==


Let ''X'' be a [[topological space]] and let ''C'' = {''C''<sub>α</sub> : α &isin; ''A''} be a [[indexed family|family]] of topological spaces, as sets subsets of ''X'' (typically ''C'' will be a [[cover (topology)|cover]] of ''X''). Then ''X'' is said to be '''coherent with ''C''''' (or '''determined by ''C''''')<ref>''X'' is also said to have the '''weak topology''' generated by ''C''. This is a potentially confusing name since the adjectives ''weak'' and ''strong'' are used with opposite meanings by different authors. In modern usage the term ''weak topology'' is synonymous with [[initial topology]] and ''strong topology'' is synonymous with [[final topology]]. It is the final topology that is being discussed here.</ref> if ''X'' has the [[final topology]] coinduced by the [[inclusion map]]s
Let <math>X</math> be a [[topological space]] and let <math>C = \left\{ C_{\alpha} : \alpha \in A \right\}</math> be a [[indexed family|family]] of subsets of <math>X,</math> each with its induced subspace topology. (Typically <math>C</math> will be a [[Cover (topology)|cover]] of <math>X</math>.) Then <math>X</math> is said to be '''coherent with <math>C</math>''' (or '''determined by <math>C</math>''')<ref><math>X</math> is also said to have the '''weak topology''' generated by <math>C.</math> This is a potentially confusing name since the adjectives {{em|weak}} and {{em|strong}} are used with opposite meanings by different authors. In modern usage the term {{em|weak topology}} is synonymous with [[initial topology]] and {{em|strong topology}} is synonymous with [[final topology]]. It is the final topology that is being discussed here.</ref> if the topology of <math>X</math> is recovered as the one coming from the [[final topology]] coinduced by the [[inclusion map]]s
:<math>i_\alpha : C_\alpha \to X\qquad \alpha \in A.</math>
<math display="block">i_\alpha : C_\alpha \to X \qquad \alpha \in A.</math>
By definition, this is the [[finest topology]] on (the underlying set of) ''X'' for which the inclusion maps are [[continuous function (topology)|continuous]].
By definition, this is the [[finest topology]] on (the underlying set of) <math>X</math> for which the inclusion maps are [[Continuous function (topology)|continuous]].
<math>X</math> is coherent with <math>C</math> if either of the following two equivalent conditions holds:
* A subset <math>U</math> is [[Open set|open]] in <math>X</math> if and only if <math>U \cap C_{\alpha}</math> is open in <math>C_{\alpha}</math> for each <math>\alpha \in A.</math>
* A subset <math>U</math> is [[Closed set|closed]] in <math>X</math> if and only if <math>U \cap C_{\alpha}</math> is closed in <math>C_{\alpha}</math> for each <math>\alpha \in A.</math>


Given a topological space <math>X</math> and any family of subspaces <math>C</math> there is a unique topology on (the underlying set of) <math>X</math> that is coherent with <math>C.</math> This topology will, in general, be [[Comparison of topologies|finer]] than the given topology on <math>X.</math>
Equivalently, ''X'' is coherent with ''C'' if either of the following two equivalent conditions holds:
*A subset ''U'' is [[open set|open]] in ''X'' if and only if ''U'' &cap; ''C''<sub>α</sub> is open in ''C''<sub>α</sub> for each α &isin; ''A''.
*A subset ''U'' is [[closed set|closed]] in ''X'' if and only if ''U'' &cap; ''C''<sub>α</sub> is closed in ''C''<sub>α</sub> for each α &isin; ''A''.


== Examples ==
Given a topological space ''X'' and any family of subspaces ''C'' there is unique topology on (the underlying set of) ''X'' that is coherent with ''C''. This topology will, in general, be [[finer topology|finer]] than the given topology on ''X''.


* A topological space <math>X</math> is coherent with every [[open cover]] of <math>X.</math> More generally, <math>X</math> is coherent with any family of subsets whose interiors cover <math>X.</math> As examples of this, a [[weakly locally compact]] space is coherent with the family of its [[Compact space|compact subspace]]s. And a [[locally connected space]] is coherent with the family of its connected subsets.
==Examples==
* A topological space <math>X</math> is coherent with every [[Locally finite collection|locally finite]] closed cover of <math>X.</math>
* A [[discrete space]] is coherent with every family of subspaces (including the [[Empty set|empty family]]).
* A topological space <math>X</math> is coherent with a [[Partition (set theory)|partition]] of <math>X</math> if and only <math>X</math> is [[homeomorphic]] to the [[Disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]] of the elements of the partition.
* [[Finitely generated space]]s are those determined by the family of all [[Finite topological space|finite subspaces]].
* [[Compactly generated space]]s (in the sense of Definition 1 in that article) are those determined by the family of all [[Compact space|compact subspace]]s.
* A [[CW complex]] <math>X</math> is coherent with its family of <math>n</math>-skeletons <math>X_n.</math>


== Topological union ==
*A topological space ''X'' is coherent with every [[open cover]] of ''X''.
*A topological space ''X'' is coherent with every [[locally finite collection|locally finite]] closed cover of ''X''.
*A [[discrete space]] is coherent with every family of subspaces (including the [[empty set|empty family]]).
*A topological space ''X'' is coherent with a [[partition (set theory)|partition]] of ''X'' if and only ''X'' is [[homeomorphic]] to the [[disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]] of the elements of the partition.
*[[Finitely generated space]]s are those determined by the family of all [[finite topological space|finite subspaces]].
*[[Compactly generated space]]s are those determined by the family of all [[compact space|compact subspace]]s.
*A [[CW complex]] ''X'' is coherent with its family of ''n''-skeletons ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>.


Let <math>\left\{ X_\alpha : \alpha \in A \right\}</math> be a family of (not necessarily [[Disjoint set|disjoint]]) topological spaces such that the [[Induced topology|induced topologies]] agree on each [[Intersection (set theory)|intersection]] <math>X_{\alpha} \cap X_{\beta}.</math>
==Topological union==
Assume further that <math>X_{\alpha} \cap X_{\beta}</math> is closed in <math>X_{\alpha}</math> for each <math>\alpha, \beta \in A.</math> Then the '''topological union''' <math>X</math> is the [[set-theoretic union]]
Let <math>\{X_\alpha, \alpha\in A\}</math> be a family of (not necessarily [[disjoint set|disjoint]]) topological spaces such that the [[induced topology|induced topologies]] agree on each [[intersection (set theory)|intersection]] ''X''<sub>α</sub> &cap; ''X''<sub>β</sub>.
<math display="block">X^{set} = \bigcup_{\alpha\in A} X_\alpha</math>
Assume further that ''X''<sub>α</sub> &cap; ''X''<sub>β</sub> is closed in ''X''<sub>α</sub> for each α,β. Then the '''topological union'''
endowed with the final topology coinduced by the inclusion maps <math>i_\alpha : X_\alpha \to X^{set}</math>. The inclusion maps will then be [[topological embedding]]s and <math>X</math> will be coherent with the subspaces <math>\left\{ X_{\alpha} \right\}.</math>
''X'' is the [[set-theoretic union]]
:<math>X^{set} = \bigcup_{\alpha\in A}X_\alpha</math>
endowed with the final topology coinduced by the inclusion maps <math>i_\alpha : X_\alpha \to X^{set}</math>. The inclusion maps will then be [[topological embedding]]s and ''X'' will be coherent with the subspaces {''X''<sub>α</sub>}.


Conversely, if ''X'' is coherent with a family of subspaces {''C''<sub>α</sub>} that cover ''X'', then ''X'' is [[homeomorphic]] to the topological union of the family {''C''<sub>α</sub>}.
Conversely, if <math>X</math> is a topological space and is coherent with a family of subspaces <math>\left\{ C_{\alpha} \right\}</math> that cover <math>X,</math> then <math>X</math> is [[homeomorphic]] to the topological union of the family <math>\left\{ C_{\alpha} \right\}.</math>


One can form the topological union of an arbitrary family of topological spaces as above, but if the topologies do not agree on the intersections then the inclusions will not necessarily be embeddings.
One can form the topological union of an arbitrary family of topological spaces as above, but if the topologies do not agree on the intersections then the inclusions will not necessarily be embeddings.


One can also describe the topological union by means of the [[disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]]. Specifically, if ''X'' is a topological union of the family {''X''<sub>α</sub>}, then ''X'' is homeomorphic to the [[Quotient space (topology)|quotient]] of the disjoint union of the family {''X''<sub>α</sub>} by the [[equivalence relation]]
One can also describe the topological union by means of the [[Disjoint union (topology)|disjoint union]]. Specifically, if <math>X</math> is a topological union of the family <math>\left\{ X_{\alpha} \right\},</math> then <math>X</math> is homeomorphic to the [[Quotient space (topology)|quotient]] of the disjoint union of the family <math>\left\{ X_{\alpha} \right\}</math> by the [[equivalence relation]]
:<math>(x,\alpha) \sim (y,\beta) \Leftrightarrow x = y</math>
<math display="block">(x,\alpha) \sim (y,\beta) \Leftrightarrow x = y</math>
for all α, β in ''A''. That is,
for all <math>\alpha, \beta \in A.</math>; that is,
:<math>X \cong \coprod_{\alpha\in A}X_\alpha / \sim .</math>
<math display="block">X \cong \coprod_{\alpha\in A}X_\alpha / \sim .</math>


If the spaces {''X''<sub>α</sub>} are all disjoint then the topological union is just the disjoint union.
If the spaces <math>\left\{ X_{\alpha} \right\}</math> are all disjoint then the topological union is just the disjoint union.


Assume now that the set A is [[Directed set|directed]], in a way compatible with inclusion: <math>\alpha\le\beta</math> whenever
Assume now that the set A is [[Directed set|directed]], in a way compatible with inclusion: <math>\alpha \leq \beta</math> whenever
<math>X_\alpha\subset X_\beta</math>. Then there is a unique map from <math>\varinjlim X_\alpha</math> to ''X'', which is in fact a homeomorphism. Here <math>\varinjlim X_\alpha</math> is the [[Direct limit|direct (inductive) limit]] ([[Limit (category theory)#Colimits|colimit]])
<math>X_\alpha\subset X_{\beta}</math>. Then there is a unique map from <math>\varinjlim X_\alpha</math> to <math>X,</math> which is in fact a homeomorphism. Here <math>\varinjlim X_\alpha</math> is the [[Direct limit|direct (inductive) limit]] ([[Limit (category theory)#Colimits|colimit]])
of {''X''<sub>α</sub>} in the category [[Category of topological spaces|'''Top''']].
of <math>\left\{ X_{\alpha} \right\}</math> in the category [[Category of topological spaces|'''Top''']].


==Properties==
== Properties ==


Let ''X'' be coherent with a family of subspaces {''C''<sub>α</sub>}. A map ''f'' : ''X'' &rarr; ''Y'' is [[continuous function (topology)|continuous]] if and only if the restrictions
Let <math>X</math> be coherent with a family of subspaces <math>\left\{ C_{\alpha} \right\}.</math> A function <math>f : X \to Y</math> from <math>X</math> to a topological space <math>Y</math> is [[continuous (topology)|continuous]] if and only if the restrictions
:<math>f|_{C_\alpha} : C_\alpha \to Y\,</math>
<math display="block">f\big\vert_{C_{\alpha}} : C_{\alpha} \to Y\,</math>
are continuous for each α &isin; ''A''. This [[universal property]] characterizes coherent topologies in the sense that a space ''X'' is coherent with ''C'' if and only if this property holds for all spaces ''Y'' and all functions ''f'' : ''X'' &rarr; ''Y''.
are continuous for each <math>\alpha \in A.</math> This [[universal property]] characterizes coherent topologies in the sense that a space <math>X</math> is coherent with <math>C</math> if and only if this property holds for all spaces <math>Y</math> and all functions <math>f : X \to Y.</math>


Let ''X'' be determined by a [[cover (topology)|cover]] ''C'' = {''C''<sub>α</sub>}. Then
Let <math>X</math> be determined by a [[cover (topology)|cover]] <math>C = \{ C_{\alpha} \}.</math> Then
*If ''C'' is a [[refinement (topology)|refinement]] of a cover ''D'', then ''X'' is determined by ''D''.
* If <math>C</math> is a [[Refinement (topology)|refinement]] of a cover <math>D,</math> then <math>X</math> is determined by <math>D.</math> In particular, if <math>C</math> is a [[subcover]] of <math>D,</math> <math>X</math> is determined by <math>D.</math>
*If ''D'' is a refinement of ''C'' and each ''C''<sub>α</sub> is determined by the family of all ''D''<sub>β</sub> contained in ''C''<sub>α</sub> then ''X'' is determined by ''D''.
* If <math>D=\{D_\beta\}</math> is a refinement of <math>C</math> and each <math>C_{\alpha}</math> is determined by the family of all <math>D_{\beta}</math> contained in <math>C_{\alpha}</math> then <math>X</math> is determined by <math>D.</math>
* Let <math>Y</math> be an open or closed [[subspace (topology)|subspace]] of <math>X,</math> or more generally a [[locally closed]] subset of <math>X.</math> Then <math>Y</math> is determined by <math>\left\{ Y \cap C_{\alpha} \right\}.</math>
* Let <math>f : X \to Y</math> be a [[quotient map (topology)|quotient map]]. Then <math>Y</math> is determined by <math>\left\{ f(C_{\alpha}) \right\}.</math>


Let <math>f : X \to Y</math> be a [[surjective map]] and suppose <math>Y</math> is determined by <math>\left\{ D_{\alpha} : \alpha \in A \right\}.</math> For each <math>\alpha \in A</math> let <math display="inline">f_\alpha : f^{-1}(D_\alpha) \to D_\alpha\,</math>be the restriction of <math>f</math> to <math>f^{-1}(D_{\alpha}).</math> Then
Let ''X'' be determined by {''C''<sub>α</sub>} and let ''Y'' be an open or closed [[subspace (topology)|subspace]] of ''X''. Then ''Y'' is determined by {''Y'' &cap; ''C''<sub>α</sub>}.
* If <math>f</math> is continuous and each <math>f_{\alpha}</math> is a quotient map, then <math>f</math> is a quotient map.
* <math>f</math> is a [[closed map]] (resp. [[open map]]) if and only if each <math>f_{\alpha}</math> is closed (resp. open).


Given a topological space <math>(X,\tau)</math> and a family of subspaces <math>C=\{C_\alpha\}</math> there is a unique topology <math>\tau_C</math> on <math>X</math> that is coherent with <math>C.</math> The topology <math>\tau_C</math> is [[Comparison of topologies|finer]] than the original topology <math>\tau,</math> and [[Comparison of topologies|strictly finer]] if <math>\tau</math> was not coherent with <math>C.</math> But the topologies <math>\tau</math> and <math>\tau_C</math> induce the same subspace topology on each of the <math>C_\alpha</math> in the family <math>C.</math> And the topology <math>\tau_C</math> is always coherent with <math>C.</math>
Let ''X'' be determined by {''C''<sub>α</sub>} and let ''f'' : ''X'' &rarr; ''Y'' be a [[quotient map]]. Then ''Y'' is determined by {f(''C''<sub>α</sub>)}.


As an example of this last construction, if <math>C</math> is the collection of all compact subspaces of a topological space <math>(X,\tau),</math> the resulting topology <math>\tau_C</math> defines the [[Compactly generated space#k-ification|k-ification]] <math>kX</math> of <math>X.</math> The spaces <math>X</math> and <math>kX</math> have the same compact sets, with the same induced subspace topologies on them. And the k-ification <math>kX</math> is compactly generated.
Let ''f'' : ''X'' &rarr; ''Y'' be a [[surjective map]] and suppose ''Y'' is determined by {''D''<sub>α</sub> : α &isin; ''A''}. For each α &isin; ''A'' let
:<math>f_\alpha : f^{-1}(D_\alpha) \to D_\alpha\,</math>
be the restriction of ''f'' to ''f''<sup>&minus;1</sup>(''D''<sub>α</sub>). Then
*If ''f'' is continuous and each ''f''<sub>α</sub> is a quotient map, then ''f'' is a quotient map.
*''f'' is a [[closed map]] (resp. [[open map]]) if and only if each ''f''<sub>α</sub> is closed (resp. open).


==Notes==
== See also ==


* {{annotated link|Final topology}}
<references/>


==References==
== Notes ==
{{reflist}}


== References ==
*{{cite encyclopedia | last = Tanaka | first = Yoshio | editor = K.P. Hart |editor2=J. Nagata |editor3=J.E. Vaughan | title = Quotient Spaces and Decompositions | encyclopedia = Encyclopedia of General Topology | publisher = Elsevier Science | location = Amsterdam | year = 2004 | pages = 43&ndash;46 | isbn=0-444-50355-2}}

*{{cite book | last = Willard | first = Stephen | title = General Topology | publisher = Addison-Wesley | location = Reading, Massachusetts | year = 1970 | id = {{isbn|0-486-43479-6}} (Dover edition)}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|last=Tanaka|first=Yoshio|editor=K.P. Hart |editor2=J. Nagata |editor3=J.E. Vaughan|title=Quotient Spaces and Decompositions|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of General Topology|publisher=Elsevier Science|location=Amsterdam|year=2004|pages=43&ndash;46|isbn=0-444-50355-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Willard|first=Stephen|title=General Topology|url=https://archive.org/details/generaltopology00will_0|url-access=registration|publisher=Addison-Wesley|location=Reading, Massachusetts|year=1970|isbn=0-486-43479-6|id=(Dover edition)}}


[[Category:General topology]]
[[Category:General topology]]

Latest revision as of 01:51, 19 January 2024

In topology, a coherent topology is a topology that is uniquely determined by a family of subspaces. Loosely speaking, a topological space is coherent with a family of subspaces if it is a topological union of those subspaces. It is also sometimes called the weak topology generated by the family of subspaces, a notion that is quite different from the notion of a weak topology generated by a set of maps.[1]

Definition

[edit]

Let be a topological space and let be a family of subsets of each with its induced subspace topology. (Typically will be a cover of .) Then is said to be coherent with (or determined by )[2] if the topology of is recovered as the one coming from the final topology coinduced by the inclusion maps By definition, this is the finest topology on (the underlying set of) for which the inclusion maps are continuous. is coherent with if either of the following two equivalent conditions holds:

  • A subset is open in if and only if is open in for each
  • A subset is closed in if and only if is closed in for each

Given a topological space and any family of subspaces there is a unique topology on (the underlying set of) that is coherent with This topology will, in general, be finer than the given topology on

Examples

[edit]

Topological union

[edit]

Let be a family of (not necessarily disjoint) topological spaces such that the induced topologies agree on each intersection Assume further that is closed in for each Then the topological union is the set-theoretic union endowed with the final topology coinduced by the inclusion maps . The inclusion maps will then be topological embeddings and will be coherent with the subspaces

Conversely, if is a topological space and is coherent with a family of subspaces that cover then is homeomorphic to the topological union of the family

One can form the topological union of an arbitrary family of topological spaces as above, but if the topologies do not agree on the intersections then the inclusions will not necessarily be embeddings.

One can also describe the topological union by means of the disjoint union. Specifically, if is a topological union of the family then is homeomorphic to the quotient of the disjoint union of the family by the equivalence relation for all ; that is,

If the spaces are all disjoint then the topological union is just the disjoint union.

Assume now that the set A is directed, in a way compatible with inclusion: whenever . Then there is a unique map from to which is in fact a homeomorphism. Here is the direct (inductive) limit (colimit) of in the category Top.

Properties

[edit]

Let be coherent with a family of subspaces A function from to a topological space is continuous if and only if the restrictions are continuous for each This universal property characterizes coherent topologies in the sense that a space is coherent with if and only if this property holds for all spaces and all functions

Let be determined by a cover Then

  • If is a refinement of a cover then is determined by In particular, if is a subcover of is determined by
  • If is a refinement of and each is determined by the family of all contained in then is determined by
  • Let be an open or closed subspace of or more generally a locally closed subset of Then is determined by
  • Let be a quotient map. Then is determined by

Let be a surjective map and suppose is determined by For each let be the restriction of to Then

  • If is continuous and each is a quotient map, then is a quotient map.
  • is a closed map (resp. open map) if and only if each is closed (resp. open).

Given a topological space and a family of subspaces there is a unique topology on that is coherent with The topology is finer than the original topology and strictly finer if was not coherent with But the topologies and induce the same subspace topology on each of the in the family And the topology is always coherent with

As an example of this last construction, if is the collection of all compact subspaces of a topological space the resulting topology defines the k-ification of The spaces and have the same compact sets, with the same induced subspace topologies on them. And the k-ification is compactly generated.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Willard, p. 69
  2. ^ is also said to have the weak topology generated by This is a potentially confusing name since the adjectives weak and strong are used with opposite meanings by different authors. In modern usage the term weak topology is synonymous with initial topology and strong topology is synonymous with final topology. It is the final topology that is being discussed here.

References

[edit]
  • Tanaka, Yoshio (2004). "Quotient Spaces and Decompositions". In K.P. Hart; J. Nagata; J.E. Vaughan (eds.). Encyclopedia of General Topology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. pp. 43–46. ISBN 0-444-50355-2.
  • Willard, Stephen (1970). General Topology. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-486-43479-6. (Dover edition).