Talk:Linx (railway company): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Nathan2055 (talk | contribs) GA |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Trains}}, {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject Sweden}}, {{WikiProject Norway}}. Tag: |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
{{GA|20:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)|topic=Engineering and technology|page=1}} |
|||
|action1=GAN |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
|action1date=20:59, 13 August 2011 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1link=Talk:Linx (railway company)/GA1 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1result=listed |
|||
⚫ | |||
|action1oldid=444688721 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|dykdate=10 November 2010 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|currentstatus=GA |
|||
|topic=transport |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Trains|importance=mid|passenger=yes|portalSAweek=44, 2016}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Talk:Linx (railway company)/GA1}} |
{{Talk:Linx (railway company)/GA1}} |
Latest revision as of 18:39, 16 February 2024
Linx (railway company) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 10, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Linx (train pictured) cited competition from low-cost airlines for terminating their Oslo−Stockholm train service? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Linx (railway company)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nathan2055talk - review 20:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
The chart
[edit]Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | There was a small problem in the lead, but I fixed it. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Looks great! It was an awesome article to read. Congratulations! A bot will update the article in about five minutes. 20:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Any time! Thanks, Nathan2055talk - review 20:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class rail transport articles
- Mid-importance rail transport articles
- Passenger trains task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- GA-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages
- GA-Class Norway articles
- Unknown-importance Norway articles
- WikiProject Norway articles