Jump to content

User talk:ReformedArsenal: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: add Template:Not around – user ReformedArsenal hasn't edited since 2018 (using Not around v4.4-unpublished)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Not around|date=2018}}
==Servetus==
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Hello first I would like to thank you for your interest on Servetus. I do not really know much about templates, but I saw that template was suggested for deletion. I don't know why. And my second question is if there is a way of creating a template infobox for physician & theologian. Those were the two main fields he was outstanding in. Thanks for your advice.--[[User:Anatoly Ilych Belousov|Anatoly Ilych Belousov]] ([[User talk:Anatoly Ilych Belousov|talk]]) 19:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 62
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(31d)
|archive = User talk:ReformedArsenal/Archive %(counter)d
}}


{{User:SuggestBot/config|frequency=weekly}}
==Disambiguation link notification for April 25==


{{archive box|auto=yes}}
Hi. When you recently edited [[Chronological list of Christian Theologians in the 4th century]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Thebes]] and [[Nyssa]] ([[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chronological_list_of_Christian_Theologians_in_the_4th_century|check to confirm]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chronological_list_of_Christian_Theologians_in_the_4th_century|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>


== WikiProject Christianity Newsletter (June 2013) ==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
== Council of Nicaea and "Protestants" ==
{| style="text-align:center; border:10px solid black; background-color:black; width:100%;"
|-
|[[File:Ichthus dark yellow.png|center|55px]]
|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
|style="font-size: 350%; color:gold; "|<br>'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS''' <br><br>
|- padding:15em;padding-top:5em;"
|style="color:gold;"|'''June 2013'''
|}
<div style="background-color:#FFF;">
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">


'''From the Editor'''<br>
Greetings!
[[File:ბუმბული.png|left|50px]]Since its formation in 2006, WikiProject Christianity has come a long way. A significant number of new articles have appeared on a wide range of topics, and the quality of some key articles has seen dramatic improvement. Yet, by the very nature of the open, [[crowd-sourced]] development environment in which we operate, as the number of pages in the project has increased at times our attention has been naturally diluted. We should of course strive for quality everywhere, but we should remember that this newsletter is called [[Ichthys|Ichthus]].
Please forgive it taking me a week since your edit to commence this discussion. The reason I undid your adding of "Protestants" to the "Accepted by" list is simply that the list already contains "Anglicans", "Calvinists", and "Lutherans"; admittedly, this is not an exhaustive list of Protestants, but methinks that if "Protestants" should remain in the list, then these groups of Protestants should be removed from the list; it's having both that I deemed a "superfluous redundancy". Soon I'll be adding some text to the article (as I've added and edited somewhat in the past) and I'd like your consensus of what should be done before I proceed or, at very least, not intertwine this issue with the unrelated edits I intend to make. I thank you, [[User:Lipsio|Vincent J. Lipsio]] ([[User talk:Lipsio|talk]]) 11:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


Starting this month we will start a "Focus on" series, where we will try to "bring Jesus back" and focus on him. For five consecutive issues we will focus on one aspect of the study of Jesus. The goal of this series is to inform our members of what the project contains and highlight those articles which have reached quality and stability.
== Apologies ==


From this month until November we will focus on the historical Jesus, a topic which has been the subject of much discussion on article talk pages, as well as the general media. This is an important topic, and we have a good set of well referenced articles on that now. Then, starting in December we will focus on Christ, and the spiritual and theological elements that the title entails. Following that the review of the life and ministry of Jesus in the New Testament, his miracles, and parables will take place. And each month the "Bookshelf" will mention a book that fits the theme of the month.
I was working on two things (RS noticeboard) and the page simultaneously. I meant to place the Christ Myth section under Islam, as is proper (historical order etc.) then got distracted writing a note to the RS board, and lost my copy of the subsection I was to post in the Docetic page. Thanks for noticing that and beating me to restoring it. I'll do the edit now.[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 18:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
== Replaceable fair use File:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg ==
[[File:Ambox warning.svg|32px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg]]'''. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|fair use]], but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|first non-free content criterion]] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


We hope you will enjoy this journey as we present a new aspect of Jesus each month. And given that as the number of project pages increases, the ratio of those watching the pages declines, we hope that more of you will watch some of these central pages that help define this project.
# Go to [[:File:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg|the media description page]] and edit it to add {{tlx|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original replaceable fair use template'''.
# On [[File talk:Bruce Herman with a painting of his father.jpg|the image discussion page]], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.


Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission|requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license]], or by taking a picture of it yourself.


'''Church of the month'''<br>
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=ReformedArsenal&namespace=6}} this link]</span>. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria|non-free content policy]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> [[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 16:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
[[File:Church of All Saints, Winthorpe - geograph.org.uk - 1117642.jpg|150px|center]]
The current building of [[All Saints' Church, Winthorpe]] in [[Nottinghamshire]], England which was completed in 1888, is at least the third version of the church, which dates back to at least the early 13th century.


==Thanks==
Thanks for fixing my mistake on the [[Christianity]] page. I did think about the connotations of the word 'illuminate' but I didn't realise it had a theological connotation too. How is it used in the theological context? [[User:Jainsworth16|Jainsworth16]] ([[User talk:Jainsworth16|talk]]) 15:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
:Illumination is the process of God bringing a reader to understand what is revealed in the Scripture.[[User:ReformedArsenal|ReformedArsenal]] ([[User talk:ReformedArsenal#top|talk]]) 20:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


'''Good articles and DYKs'''<br>
==Template==
The article [[Jesus]] received the [[WP:GA|good article]] mark last month, as did [[Cleeve Abbey]]. A number of churches were featured on the main page in the [[WP:DYK|DYK]] section in May, namely [[St. Lamberti, Hildesheim]], [[Karja church]], [[Braaby Church]], [[St Patrick's Church, Liverpool|St Patrick's Liverpool]], [[Vlah Church]], [[Freerslev Church]], [[Cathedral of Our Lady of the Assumption, Mata-Utu]], [[St. Michael's Cathedral (Sitka, Alaska)]], [[St. Lamberti, Hildesheim]], [[Karja church]], [[Braaby Church]], [[St. Pierre Cathedral, Saint-Pierre]], [[Mont Saint Michel Abbey]], [[St Patrick's Church, Liverpool]], [[Vlah Church]], [[St Catherine of Siena Church, Cocking]], [[Catedral Nuestra Señora de La Asunción]], [[Roholte Church]], [[Notre Dame Cathedral, Taiohae]], [[Leicester Abbey]], [[Caracas Cathedral]], [[Caldey Abbey]], [[King's Mead Priory]], [[Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Hong Kong)]] and[[All Saints' Church, Winthorpe]], as well as the hymn [[What Wondrous Love Is This]].
</div>


<div style="float:right; width:49%;">
{{ sidebar with collapsible lists
'''Focus on...'''<br>
| expanded = {{#ifeq:{{{state|}}}|collapsed||flagged}}
[[File:Christ icon.jpg|left|100px]]
| name = Christian History
<BIG>T</BIG>HE</br>
| class = hlist
<BIG>H</BIG>ISTORICAL <BIG>J</BIG>ESUS
| headingstyle = background-color: lavender; border-bottom: 5px solid #efefef
{{clear|left}}
| listtitlestyle = background-color: lavender; text-align: center
Did Jesus exist? Did he walk the streets of Jerusalem? The '''[[Historicity of Jesus]]''' article answers these questions with a firm affirmative. Historicity does not discuss if Jesus walked on water, but if he walked at all. The issue was the subject of scholarly debate before the end of last century, but the academic debate is almost over now. As the article discusses, virtually all academic opposition to the existence of Jesus has evaporated away now and scholars see it as a concluded issue. The discussion is now just among mostly self-published non-academics.


In 2011 [[John Dickson (author)|John Dickson]] tweeted that if anyone finds a professor of history who denies that Jesus lived,[http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2012/12/24/3660194.htm he would eat a page] of his Bible (Matthew 1 he said). Dickson's Bible is still safe.
| pretitle = Part of a series on
| title = [[Christian history]]
| image = [[File:Bible.malmesbury.arp.jpg|frameless]]


The article discusses the ancient sources that relate to Jesus and how they fit together to establish that he existed. The evidence for Jesus is not just based on the Christian gospels, but by inter-relating them with non-Christian sources, and the fact that they all "fit together". Moreover, the existence of Jesus is not supported just by Christian scholars and in recent years the detailed knowledge of Jewish scholars and their discoveries (e.g. [[Shlomo Pines]]' discovery of the [[Josephus on Jesus|Syriac Josephus]]) has proven highly beneficial. We encourage you to read and follow the article, for the existence of Jesus is central to the existence of Christianity.
| list1title = [[Jesus]]{{,}} [[Christ]]
| list1name = flagged
| list1 =
* [[item a]]
* [[item b]]
* [[item c]]


'''From the bookshelf'''<br>
| list2title = [[Bible|Bible]]
[[File:SanDiegoCityCollegeLearingRecourceCity-bookshelf.jpg|left|100px]]''Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence'' by Robert Van Voorst, 2000 {{ISBN|0-8028-4368-9}}
| list2name = flagged
{{clear|left}}
| list2 =
Just a few years after its publication, [[Robert Van Voorst|Van Voorst]]'s book has become the standard comprehensive text for the discussion of ancient sources that relate to Jesus and his historicity. This detailed yet really readable book has received wide ranging endorsements - [[Craig L. Blomberg|Blomberg]] and [[Stephen L. Harris|Harris]] separately referring to it as the most comprehensive treatment of the subject.
* [[item a]]
* [[item b]]
* [[item c]]


'''Did you know...'''
| list3title = [[Other items]]
[[File:Soli deo gloria.jpg|thumb|right|100px|A Handel manuscript]]
| list3name = {{#if:{{{expand-nontrinitarian|}}}|flagged|unflagged}}
*... that [[Johann Sebastian Bach]] wrote the initials "S. D. G.", for [[Soli Deo Gloria]], at the beginning and end of all his church compositions to give God credit for the work, and that [[George Frideric Handel|Handel]] at times did the same?
| list3 =
'''[[Item 1]]'''
* [[Item 2]]
* [[Item 3]]


</div>
| below = {{portal-inline|Christianity}}
}}<noinclude>{{documentation}}<!-- place category and language links and usage notes on the /doc sub-page, not here --></noinclude>


<div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
John Carter said that he has built whatever needs to be built for the history workgroup. FYI. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 12:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
'''Calendar'''<br>
The coming month includes days dedicated to the honor of [[Beheading of John the Baptist]], [[Saints Peter and Paul]], the [[Nativity of John the Baptist]], and [[Saint Barnabas]].


-----
== '''Vejlefjord’s Request ''' ==
'''Help requests'''<br>
Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.


<div class="center">''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Christianity/Outreach#Newsletter|Ichthus]]'' is published by [[WP:X|WikiProject Christianity]].<br><small>For submissions contact the [[WT:WikiProject Christianity/Outreach|Newsroom]] • To unsubscribe remove yourself from the list[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Outreach/Full content delivery|here]]<br>
Would you, please, take a look at [[User:Vejlefjord/Theodicy and the Bible (3rd draft)]] and give me your opinion? I want a draft good enough to “go live” without being deleted or userfied so that other editors, perhaps you, can make it a better article. Do you think the draft is good enough for this purpose? Do you have specific suggestions that you think would make it better? I am unable to do much more work on the draft. Thank you. I will check back here next weekend. [[User:Vejlefjord|Vejlefjord]] ([[User talk:Vejlefjord|talk]]) 02:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
[[File:IchtusWikiproject.JPG|70px]]<br>[[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]])<includeonly>~</includeonly><includeonly>~~</includeonly><includeonly>~~</includeonly></small></div>
:: It looks pretty good. A few things that would make it better would be to use the citation templates available in Wiki for uniformity (if you don't, I will probably go through and do that after you publish it), and clean up some of the language (Debate re “natural freedom” is one of the subject headings, you should clean that up to something like "Debates on natural freedom and theodicy"). Other than that it looks like a very good article with lots of good sourcing. I don't see why this would be deleted, and the minor problems will fix themselves over time as other editors make their passes (Me included). Let me know when you publish it, I look forward to it.[[User:ReformedArsenal|ReformedArsenal]] ([[User talk:ReformedArsenal#top|talk]]) 14:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
</div></div></div>
::::Thanks for your reply and for your willingess to work on the article. Following your suggestion, I removed all uses of “re.” I tried to follow “Wikipedia:Citing sources” and ''The Chicago Manual on Style ''. I tried to understand the “citation templates” to which you referred, but I lack the Wiki-competence to do so. So I have published (“go live”) the article. Please check it out, remove the new article template if there is one, and rate it if you like. [[User:Vejlefjord|Vejlefjord]] ([[User talk:Vejlefjord|talk]]) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0537 -->
::::::Thank you for getting right to work improving "Theodicy and the Bible." Keep up the good work. [[User:Vejlefjord|Vejlefjord]] ([[User talk:Vejlefjord|talk]]) 17:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
:: '''Theodicy and the Bible Article.''' Notice that User:StAnselm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:StAnselm) has added a banner to the article “Theodicy and the Bible” that reads “This article is written like a personal reflection or essay rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (June 2012)” You might want to give your opinion to User:StAnselm. [[User:Vejlefjord|Vejlefjord]] ([[User talk:Vejlefjord|talk]]) 21:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


== Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination ==
==Long term cost of arguments==
One of the things I have noticed over the years is the long term effect of wiki-arguments, regardless of who wins the debate. We have seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Carlaude too many of these] now. That was a good user, but would argue passionately. He would sometimes win, sometimes lose, but in the end the bitterness left by the arguments "piles up". After a while it just gets to much and the retired banner appears. There are strategies for not letting that get to you, but that is a longer story.


[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested &#32;at [[Talk:Pre-Socratic philosophy|'''Talk:Pre-Socratic philosophy'''&#32; on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. &#124; Sent at 14:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
My advice would be not to get worked up about the use of the Aramaic, make a deal halfway and move on. What you can do is agree to have it in the Etymology section with a qualifier that there are no first century documents that include it and what there is based on the "reasoning of scholars". That will clarify it. Then it does not need to appear in the lede.


== You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service ==
I do not really care which way that inclusion goes (nor will 99% of other readers) but I think it would be best if you do not let it weigh on your heart either way. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 08:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


'''Hi ReformedArsenal!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]], but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over two years.
==Your suggestion==
I think I have started to agree with you, [[Talk:Jesus#Is_this_talk_page_running_into_WP:TE_.3F |as stated here]] now. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 10:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
== Apology for Corporate Election Comments ==


'''You do not need to do anything about this''' - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
Please forgive me for the improper tone and attitude concerning the tags assigned by you to the corporate election article. The defensive posture I took was unnecessary. I should have just asked for examples. I made a change to that post and noted my apologies to you in the comments box. While I see the validity in a couple of your examples (and will seek to make the proper corrections as I have time), I will need your patience in helping me to better understand the validity in the others.

Thank you,
# Go to the [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service page]].
ClassArm
# Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the [[WP:RFC|RfC]] and/or [[WP:GA|GA]] headings.
# Paste {{tlx|1=Frs user|2=ReformedArsenal|3=''limit''}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where ''limit'' is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
# Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on [[WT:FRS|the Feedback Request Service talk page]], or on [[User talk:Naypta|the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page]]. '''Thank you!'''
Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. &#124; Sent at 18:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

== You have been pruned from a list ==

'''Hi ReformedArsenal!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members]], but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members]].

'''Thank you!'''
Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. &#124; Sent at 18:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:15, 28 March 2024


WikiProject Christianity Newsletter (June 2013)

[edit]

ICHTHUS

June 2013

From the Editor

Since its formation in 2006, WikiProject Christianity has come a long way. A significant number of new articles have appeared on a wide range of topics, and the quality of some key articles has seen dramatic improvement. Yet, by the very nature of the open, crowd-sourced development environment in which we operate, as the number of pages in the project has increased at times our attention has been naturally diluted. We should of course strive for quality everywhere, but we should remember that this newsletter is called Ichthus.

Starting this month we will start a "Focus on" series, where we will try to "bring Jesus back" and focus on him. For five consecutive issues we will focus on one aspect of the study of Jesus. The goal of this series is to inform our members of what the project contains and highlight those articles which have reached quality and stability.

From this month until November we will focus on the historical Jesus, a topic which has been the subject of much discussion on article talk pages, as well as the general media. This is an important topic, and we have a good set of well referenced articles on that now. Then, starting in December we will focus on Christ, and the spiritual and theological elements that the title entails. Following that the review of the life and ministry of Jesus in the New Testament, his miracles, and parables will take place. And each month the "Bookshelf" will mention a book that fits the theme of the month.

We hope you will enjoy this journey as we present a new aspect of Jesus each month. And given that as the number of project pages increases, the ratio of those watching the pages declines, we hope that more of you will watch some of these central pages that help define this project.


Church of the month

The current building of All Saints' Church, Winthorpe in Nottinghamshire, England which was completed in 1888, is at least the third version of the church, which dates back to at least the early 13th century.


Good articles and DYKs
The article Jesus received the good article mark last month, as did Cleeve Abbey. A number of churches were featured on the main page in the DYK section in May, namely St. Lamberti, Hildesheim, Karja church, Braaby Church, St Patrick's Liverpool, Vlah Church, Freerslev Church, Cathedral of Our Lady of the Assumption, Mata-Utu, St. Michael's Cathedral (Sitka, Alaska), St. Lamberti, Hildesheim, Karja church, Braaby Church, St. Pierre Cathedral, Saint-Pierre, Mont Saint Michel Abbey, St Patrick's Church, Liverpool, Vlah Church, St Catherine of Siena Church, Cocking, Catedral Nuestra Señora de La Asunción, Roholte Church, Notre Dame Cathedral, Taiohae, Leicester Abbey, Caracas Cathedral, Caldey Abbey, King's Mead Priory, Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Hong Kong) andAll Saints' Church, Winthorpe, as well as the hymn What Wondrous Love Is This.

Focus on...

THE
HISTORICAL JESUS

Did Jesus exist? Did he walk the streets of Jerusalem? The Historicity of Jesus article answers these questions with a firm affirmative. Historicity does not discuss if Jesus walked on water, but if he walked at all. The issue was the subject of scholarly debate before the end of last century, but the academic debate is almost over now. As the article discusses, virtually all academic opposition to the existence of Jesus has evaporated away now and scholars see it as a concluded issue. The discussion is now just among mostly self-published non-academics.

In 2011 John Dickson tweeted that if anyone finds a professor of history who denies that Jesus lived,he would eat a page of his Bible (Matthew 1 he said). Dickson's Bible is still safe.

The article discusses the ancient sources that relate to Jesus and how they fit together to establish that he existed. The evidence for Jesus is not just based on the Christian gospels, but by inter-relating them with non-Christian sources, and the fact that they all "fit together". Moreover, the existence of Jesus is not supported just by Christian scholars and in recent years the detailed knowledge of Jewish scholars and their discoveries (e.g. Shlomo Pines' discovery of the Syriac Josephus) has proven highly beneficial. We encourage you to read and follow the article, for the existence of Jesus is central to the existence of Christianity.

From the bookshelf

Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence by Robert Van Voorst, 2000 ISBN 0-8028-4368-9

Just a few years after its publication, Van Voorst's book has become the standard comprehensive text for the discussion of ancient sources that relate to Jesus and his historicity. This detailed yet really readable book has received wide ranging endorsements - Blomberg and Harris separately referring to it as the most comprehensive treatment of the subject.

Did you know...

A Handel manuscript
  • ... that Johann Sebastian Bach wrote the initials "S. D. G.", for Soli Deo Gloria, at the beginning and end of all his church compositions to give God credit for the work, and that Handel at times did the same?

Calendar
The coming month includes days dedicated to the honor of Beheading of John the Baptist, Saints Peter and Paul, the Nativity of John the Baptist, and Saint Barnabas.


Help requests
Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity.
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe remove yourself from the listhere

EdwardsBot (talk)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pre-Socratic philosophy on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

[edit]

Hi ReformedArsenal! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over two years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|ReformedArsenal|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

[edit]

Hi ReformedArsenal! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]