Jump to content

Napier Nomad: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Nomad II: Improved wording
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|British diesel aircraft engine}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2017}}
{{Use British English|date=December 2017}}
Line 20: Line 21:
|}
|}


The '''Napier Nomad''' was a British [[diesel engine|diesel]] [[aircraft engine]] designed and built by [[Napier & Son]] in 1949. They combined a piston engine with a [[turbine]] to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve [[fuel efficiency|fuel economy]]. Two versions were tested, the complex '''Nomad I''' which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the '''Nomad II''', using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest [[specific fuel consumption (shaft engine)|specific fuel consumption]] figures seen up to that time.<ref name="Gunston, Encyc. Aero Engines, p106" >{{cite book
The '''Napier Nomad''' is a British [[diesel engine|diesel]] [[aircraft engine]] designed and built by [[Napier & Son]] in 1949. They combined a [[piston engine]] with a [[turbine]] to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve [[fuel efficiency|fuel economy]]. Two versions were tested, the complex '''Nomad I''' which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the '''Nomad II''', using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest [[specific fuel consumption (shaft engine)|specific fuel consumption]] figures seen up to that time.<ref name="Gunston, Encyc. Aero Engines, p106" >{{cite book
|last=Gunston |first=Bill |authorlink=Bill Gunston
|last=Gunston |first=Bill |authorlink=Bill Gunston
|title=World Encyclopaedia of Aero Engines
|title=World Encyclopaedia of Aero Engines
Line 33: Line 34:
|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1967/1967%20-%201672.html
|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1967/1967%20-%201672.html
|date=17 August 1967
|date=17 August 1967
|pages=262
|page=262
|ref=Flight, 17 August 1967, Cancelled projects list
|ref=Flight, 17 August 1967, Cancelled projects list
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=March 5, 2016
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305152115/https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1967/1967%20-%201672.html
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 40: Line 44:
[[File:Napier Nomad Model E. 145 Diesel Engine.jpg|thumb|At the [[Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center]]]]
[[File:Napier Nomad Model E. 145 Diesel Engine.jpg|thumb|At the [[Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center]]]]
[[File:Napier Nomad I East fortune front.jpg|thumb|Napier Nomad 1]]
[[File:Napier Nomad I East fortune front.jpg|thumb|Napier Nomad 1]]
In 1945 the [[Air Ministry]] asked for proposals for a new {{convert|6000|hp|kW|abbr=on}} class engine with good fuel economy. [[Curtiss-Wright]] was designing an engine of this sort of power known as the [[turbo-compound engine]], but Sir [[Harry Ricardo]], one of Britain's great engine designers, suggested that the most economical combination would be a similar design using a diesel two-stroke in place of the Curtiss's [[gasoline|petrol]] engine.
In 1945 the [[Air Ministry]] asked for proposals for a new {{cvt|6000|hp|MW}} class engine with good fuel economy. [[Curtiss-Wright]] was designing an engine of this sort of power known as the [[turbo-compound engine]], but Sir [[Harry Ricardo]], one of Britain's great engine designers, suggested that the most economical combination would be a similar design using a diesel two-stroke in place of the Curtiss [[gasoline|petrol]] engine.


Before [[World War II]] Napier had licensed the [[Junkers Jumo 204]] diesel design to set up production in the UK as the [[Napier Culverin]], but the onset of the war made the [[Napier Sabre|Sabre]] all-important and work on the Culverin was stopped. In response to the Air Ministry's 1945 requirements Napier dusted off this work, combining two enlarged Culverins into an [[H engine|H-block]] similar to the Sabre, resulting in a massive 75&nbsp;litre design. Markets for an engine of this size seemed limited, however, so instead they reverted to the original Sabre-like [[Flat engine|horizontally opposed]] 12 [[Cylinder (engine)|cylinder]] design, and the result was the Nomad.
Before [[World War II]] Napier had licensed the [[Junkers Jumo 204]] diesel design to set up production in the UK as the [[Napier Culverin]], but the onset of the war made the [[Napier Sabre|Sabre]] all-important and work on the Culverin was stopped. In response to the Air Ministry's 1945 requirements Napier dusted off this work, combining two enlarged Culverins into an [[H engine|H-block]] similar to the Sabre, resulting in a massive 75&nbsp;litre design. Markets for an engine of this size seemed limited, however, so instead they reverted to the original Sabre-like [[Flat engine|horizontally opposed]] 12 [[Cylinder (engine)|cylinder]] design, and the result was the Nomad.


The objective of the design was to produce a civilian power plant with far superior fuel efficiency to the emerging jet engine. Thermal efficiency is given by <math>1 - T_e/T_p</math>, where ''T''{{sub|e}} is the exhaust temperature in [[kelvin]]s<!-- pluralized – see Kelvin#Usage conventions --> and ''T''{{sub|p}} is the peak combustion temperature. Jet engines have relatively low-temperature combustion systems which produce a ''T''{{sub|p}} of no more than about 1,000&nbsp;K, much less than the typical 5,000&nbsp;K of a reciprocating engine, and so jets have very poor thermal efficiency. The Nomad design focused on replacing the low-temperature combustion chambers of the jet engine with highly efficient Diesel combustion chambers. In practice, it was much too difficult to couple the diesel power output back into the turbine cycle. The maximum practical power of the Nomad was {{convert|4000|hp|kW|abbr=on}}, and it was much heavier than a pure jet of the same power. By this time civilian jets such as the [[Boeing 707]] were nearing completion, and the Nomad was never seriously considered by any aircraft manufacturer.
The objective of the design was to produce a civilian power plant with far superior fuel efficiency to the emerging jet engine. [[Thermal efficiency]] is given by <math>1 - T_e/T_p</math>, where ''T''{{sub|e}} is the exhaust temperature in [[kelvin]]s<!-- pluralized – see Kelvin#Usage conventions --> and ''T''{{sub|p}} is the peak combustion temperature. Jet engines have relatively low-temperature combustion systems which produce a ''T''{{sub|p}} of no more than about 1,000&nbsp;K, much less than the typical 5,000&nbsp;K of a reciprocating engine, and so jets have very poor thermal efficiency. The Nomad design focused on replacing the low-temperature combustion chambers of the jet engine with highly efficient Diesel combustion chambers. In practice, it was much too difficult to couple the diesel power output back into the turbine cycle. The maximum practical power of the Nomad was {{cvt|4000|hp|MW}}, and it was much heavier than a pure jet of the same power. By this time civilian jets such as the [[Boeing 707]] were nearing completion, and the Nomad was never seriously considered by any aircraft manufacturer.


===Nomad I===
===Nomad I===
Line 50: Line 54:
The initial Nomad design (E.125) or Nomad 1 was incredibly complex, almost two engines in one. One was a [[Twincharger|turbo-supercharged]] two-stroke diesel, having some resemblance to half of a [[Napier Sabre|Napier Sabre's]] [[H engine|H-24]]. Mounted below this were the rotating parts of a [[turboprop]] engine, based on the [[Napier Naiad|Naiad]] design, the output of which drove the front propeller of a contra-rotating pair. To achieve higher boost, the crankshaft drove a centrifugal supercharger, which also provided the scavenging needed for starting the engine from rest. During take-off additional fuel was injected into the rear [[turbine]] stage for more power, and turned off once the aircraft was cruising.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=170}}
The initial Nomad design (E.125) or Nomad 1 was incredibly complex, almost two engines in one. One was a [[Twincharger|turbo-supercharged]] two-stroke diesel, having some resemblance to half of a [[Napier Sabre|Napier Sabre's]] [[H engine|H-24]]. Mounted below this were the rotating parts of a [[turboprop]] engine, based on the [[Napier Naiad|Naiad]] design, the output of which drove the front propeller of a contra-rotating pair. To achieve higher boost, the crankshaft drove a centrifugal supercharger, which also provided the scavenging needed for starting the engine from rest. During take-off additional fuel was injected into the rear [[turbine]] stage for more power, and turned off once the aircraft was cruising.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=170}}


The compressor and turbine assemblies of the Nomad were tested during 1948, and the complete unit was run in October 1949. The prototype was installed in the nose of an [[Avro Lincoln]] [[heavy bomber]] for testing: it first flew in 1950 and appeared at the [[Farnborough Air Display]] on 10 September 1951.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=172}} In total the Nomad I ran for just over 1,000 hours, and proved to be rather temperamental, but when running properly it could produce {{convert|3000|hp|kW|abbr=on}} and {{convert|320|lbf|kN|abbr=on}} thrust. It had a [[specific fuel consumption (shaft engine)|specific fuel consumption]] (sfc) of {{convert|0.36|lb/hp/h|kg/kW/h|abbr=on}}.
The compressor and turbine assemblies of the Nomad were tested during 1948, and the complete unit was run in October 1949. The prototype was installed in the nose of an [[Avro Lincoln]] [[heavy bomber]] for testing: it first flew in 1950 and appeared at the [[Farnborough Air Display]] on 10 September 1951.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=172}} In total the Nomad I ran for just over 1,000 hours, and proved to be rather temperamental, but when running properly it could produce {{cvt|3000|hp|MW}} and {{convert|320|lbf|kN|abbr=on}} thrust. It had a [[specific fuel consumption (shaft engine)|specific fuel consumption]] (sfc) of {{convert|0.36|lb/hph|g/kWh|abbr=on}}.


The prototype Nomad I is on display at the [[National Museum of Flight]] at [[East Fortune|East Fortune Airfield]] in [[Scotland]].
The prototype Nomad I is on display at the [[National Museum of Flight]] at [[East Fortune|East Fortune Airfield]] in [[Scotland]].
Line 57: Line 61:
[[File:Napier Nomad ¾ front view.jpg|thumb|Front three-quarter view of a Nomad II]]
[[File:Napier Nomad ¾ front view.jpg|thumb|Front three-quarter view of a Nomad II]]
[[File:Napier Nomad Plan view.jpg|thumb|Topside view]]
[[File:Napier Nomad Plan view.jpg|thumb|Topside view]]
Even before the Nomad I was running, its successor, the '''Nomad II''' (E.145) Nomad 6, had already been designed. In this version an extra stage was added to the axial compressor/supercharger, eliminating the separate centrifugal part and the intercooler. The turbine (which also received an additional stage) was now only used to drive the compressor, and feed back any excess power to the main shaft using a [[Beier variable-ratio gear]];{{sfnp|''Flight'' (30 April 1954)|page=549}} the separate propeller from the turbine was deleted, just as the whole of the "[[afterburner]]" system with its valves etc. So the system was now like a combination of a mechanical [[supercharger]], and a [[turbocharger]] without any need for bypass. The result was smaller and considerably simpler: a single engine driving a single propeller.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=171}} Overall about {{convert|1000|lb|abbr=on}} was taken off the weight. The [[wet liner]]s of the cylinders of the Nomad I were changed for [[dry liner]]s.{{sfnp|''Flight'' (30 April 1954)|page=550}}
Even before the Nomad I was running, its successor, the '''Nomad II''' (E.145) Nomad 6, had already been designed. In this version an extra stage was added to the axial compressor/supercharger, eliminating the separate centrifugal part and the intercooler. The turbine (which also received an additional stage) was now only used to drive the compressor, and feed back any excess power to the main shaft using a [[Beier variable-ratio gear]];{{sfnp|''Flight'' (30 April 1954)|page=549}} the separate propeller from the turbine was deleted, just as the whole of the "[[afterburner]]" system with its valves etc. So the system was now like a combination of a mechanical [[supercharger]], and a [[turbocharger]] without any need for bypass. The result was smaller and considerably simpler: a single engine driving a single propeller.{{sfnp|Lumsden|2003|page=171}} Overall weight reduction was {{convert|1000|lb|abbr=on}}. The [[wet liner]]s of the cylinders of the Nomad I were changed for [[dry liner]]s.{{sfnp|''Flight'' (30 April 1954)|page=550}}


While the Nomad II was undergoing testing, a prototype [[Avro Shackleton]] was lent to Napier as a testbed. The engine proved bulky, like the Nomad I before it, and in the meantime several dummy engines were used on the Shackleton for various tests.
While the Nomad II was undergoing testing, a prototype [[Avro Shackleton]] was lent to Napier as a testbed. The engine proved bulky, like the Nomad I before it, and in the meantime several dummy engines were used on the Shackleton for various tests.


On an equivalent power basis, the Nomad II had an SFC of {{cvt|0.327|lb/hph|g/kWh}} at {{cvt|25000|ft}} cruise altitude.<ref name="DP195409">{{cite magazine |issn=1040-8878 |magazine=Diesel Progress |title=What's going on in England: Napier Nomad |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_diesel-progress_1954-09_20/page/56 |pages=56, 58 |publication-date=September 1954 |given=Hamish |surname=Ferguson}}</ref>
A further development, the Nomad Nm.7, of {{convert|3500|shp|abbr=on}} was announced in 1953.<ref>[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%201456.html ''Flight'' Nov 1953 p 610]</ref>


A further development, the Nomad Nm.7, of {{cvt|3500|shp|MW}} was announced in 1953.<ref name="FI19531106">{{cite magazine |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%201456.html |magazine=[[Flight International|Flight]] |title=Here and there |publication-date=November 6, 1953 |page=610 |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 13, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413032333/https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1953/1953%20-%201456.PDF}}</ref>
By 1954 interest in the Nomad was waning, and after the only project, the [[Avro Shackleton|Avro Type 719 Shackleton IV]], based on it was cancelled, work on the engine was ended in April 1955, after an expenditure of £5.1 million.

By 1954 interest in the Nomad was waning, and after the only project, the [[Avro Shackleton|Avro Type 719 Shackleton IV]], based on it was cancelled, work on the engine was ended in April 1955, after an expenditure of £5.1 million. The design was also considered for the [[Canadair Argus]], a similar [[maritime patrol aircraft]] being designed for the [[Royal Canadian Air Force]]. This design turned to the [[Wright R-3350 Duplex-Cyclone|Wright R-3350]], the design the Nomad was intending to best.


A Nomad II is on display at the [[Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center]] in [[Virginia]].<ref>[https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/napier-nomad-model-e-145-horizontally-opposed-diesel-engine/nasm_A19640017000 Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center - Napier Nomad] Retrieved: 7 April 2020</ref>
A Nomad II is on display at the [[Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center]] in [[Virginia]].<ref>[https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/napier-nomad-model-e-145-horizontally-opposed-diesel-engine/nasm_A19640017000 Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center - Napier Nomad] Retrieved: 7 April 2020</ref>
Line 71: Line 77:
|journal=[[Flight (magazine)|Flight]]
|journal=[[Flight (magazine)|Flight]]
|date=17 April 1953
|date=17 April 1953
|title=Aircraft Intelligence: Great Britain
|title=Aircraft intelligence: Great Britain
|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%200489.html
|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%200489.html
|page=485
|page=485
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=April 16, 2016
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160416181604/https://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1953/1953%20-%200489.PDF
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
* [[Avro Lincoln]] (test bed only)
* [[Avro Lincoln]] (test bed only)
Line 91: Line 100:
|ref={{harvid|Flight (30 April 1954)}}
|ref={{harvid|Flight (30 April 1954)}}
|access-date=18 December 2009
|access-date=18 December 2009
|url-status=dead
|archive-date=October 8, 2012
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121008202652/http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1954/1954%20-%201215.html
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
|bore={{convert|6.00|in|mm|abbr=on}}
|bore={{convert|6.00|in|mm|abbr=on}}
Line 107: Line 119:
|oilsystem=
|oilsystem=
|coolingsystem=[[Radiator (engine cooling)|Liquid-cooled]]
|coolingsystem=[[Radiator (engine cooling)|Liquid-cooled]]
|power={{convert|3150|hp|kW|abbr=on}} max take-off at {{convert|89|psi|kPa|abbr=on}} boost including 320 lbf residual [[thrust]] from the turbine at 2,050 [[Revolutions per minute|rpm]] (crankshaft) and 18,200 rpm (turbine)
|power={{convert|3150|hp|kW|abbr=on}} max take-off at {{convert|89|psi|kPa|abbr=on}} boost not including 320 lbf residual [[thrust]] from the turbine at 2,050 [[Revolutions per minute|rpm]] (crankshaft) and 18,200 rpm (turbine)
|specpower={{convert|1.25|hp/in3|kW/L|abbr=on|}}
|specpower={{convert|1.25|hp/in3|kW/L|abbr=on|}}
|compression=18.1 (cylinder ratio), 31.5:1 (overall pressure ratio)
|compression=8.1 (cylinder ratio), 31.5:1 (overall pressure ratio)
|fuelcon=
|fuelcon=
|specfuelcon=0.345 lb/(ehp·h) (0.210 kg/(kW·h)) (combined unit) at 11,000 ft and 300 kn
|specfuelcon=0.345 lb/(ehp·h) (0.210 kg/(kW·h)) (combined unit) at 11,000 ft and 300 kn
Line 174: Line 186:
}}
}}
*https://www.thegrowler.org.uk/avroshackleton/the-nomad-proposal.htm – ''The Nomad Proposal'', research by Chris Ashworth – it was amongst the original sources of the article according to the history
*https://www.thegrowler.org.uk/avroshackleton/the-nomad-proposal.htm – ''The Nomad Proposal'', research by Chris Ashworth – it was amongst the original sources of the article according to the history
*{{cite magazine |issn=0005-2175 |magazine=[[Aviation Week]] |title=Compound diesel engine design analyzed |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_aviation-week-space-technology_1954-05-17_60_20/page/30 |department=Aeronautical Engineering |pages=30–32, 34 |publication-date=May 17, 1954 |volume=60 |number=20}}
*{{cite magazine |issn=0005-2175 |magazine=[[Aviation Week]] |title=New Nomad's fuel appetite is small |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_aviation-week-space-technology_1953-04-06_58_14/page/30 |department=Aeronautical Engineering |pages=30–32, 37–38, 41 |publication-date=April 6, 1953 |volume=58 |number=14 |given=David A. |surname=Anderton}}
*{{cite magazine |issn=0005-2175 |magazine=[[Aviation Week]] |title=Weak production handcuffs British air |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_aviation-week-space-technology_1951-10-08_55_15/page/12 |department=Farnborough Verdict |pages=12–15 |publication-date=October 8, 1951 |volume=55 |number=15 |given=David A. |surname=Anderton}}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Napier Nomad}}
{{Commons category|Napier Nomad}}
*[http://www.enginehistory.org/Piston/Napier/napier.shtml Aircraft Engine Historical Society photo gallery of Napier piston engines]
*[http://www.enginehistory.org/Piston/Napier/napier.shtml Aircraft Engine Historical Society photo gallery of Napier piston engines]
*[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1952/1952%20-%201121.html "Napier Nomad" a 1952 ''Flight'' advertisement for the Nomad engine]
*{{cite magazine |author=D. Napier and Son Limited |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1952/1952%20-%201121.html |title=Napier Nomad |publication-date=April 25, 1952 |magazine=[[Flight International|Flight]] |page=35 |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 28, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150328122318/http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1952/1952%20-%201121.PDF}}
*[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%200350.html "Nomad NNm6"] a 1953 ''Flight'' article on the Nomad II
*{{cite magazine |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%200350.html |title=NOMAD NNm6: Napiers' new compounded engine |page=348 |publication-date=March 20, 1953 |magazine=[[Flight International|Flight]] |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 18, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140518084225/http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1953/1953%20-%200350.PDF}}
*[http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1961/1961%20-%200750.html A Napier Nomad 2 mounted in the outboard nacelle of a Shackleton] in a 1961 issue of ''Flight''
*{{cite magazine |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1961/1961%20-%200750.html |title=Napier, Luton... |publication-date=April 1, 1961 |magazine=[[Flight International|Flight]] |pages=760–761 |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 5, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305171930/https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1961/1961%20-%200750.html}}


{{Napier aeroengines}}
{{Napier aeroengines}}

Latest revision as of 13:41, 11 May 2024

Nomad
Napier Nomad II
Type Turbo-compound
aero-engine
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Napier & Son
First run October 1949
Major applications Avro Lincoln (test bed only)

The Napier Nomad is a British diesel aircraft engine designed and built by Napier & Son in 1949. They combined a piston engine with a turbine to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve fuel economy. Two versions were tested, the complex Nomad I which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the Nomad II, using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest specific fuel consumption figures seen up to that time.[1] Despite this the Nomad project was cancelled in 1955 having spent £5.1 million on development, as most interest had passed to turboprop designs.[2]

Design and development

[edit]
At the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center
Napier Nomad 1

In 1945 the Air Ministry asked for proposals for a new 6,000 hp (4.5 MW) class engine with good fuel economy. Curtiss-Wright was designing an engine of this sort of power known as the turbo-compound engine, but Sir Harry Ricardo, one of Britain's great engine designers, suggested that the most economical combination would be a similar design using a diesel two-stroke in place of the Curtiss petrol engine.

Before World War II Napier had licensed the Junkers Jumo 204 diesel design to set up production in the UK as the Napier Culverin, but the onset of the war made the Sabre all-important and work on the Culverin was stopped. In response to the Air Ministry's 1945 requirements Napier dusted off this work, combining two enlarged Culverins into an H-block similar to the Sabre, resulting in a massive 75 litre design. Markets for an engine of this size seemed limited, however, so instead they reverted to the original Sabre-like horizontally opposed 12 cylinder design, and the result was the Nomad.

The objective of the design was to produce a civilian power plant with far superior fuel efficiency to the emerging jet engine. Thermal efficiency is given by , where Te is the exhaust temperature in kelvins and Tp is the peak combustion temperature. Jet engines have relatively low-temperature combustion systems which produce a Tp of no more than about 1,000 K, much less than the typical 5,000 K of a reciprocating engine, and so jets have very poor thermal efficiency. The Nomad design focused on replacing the low-temperature combustion chambers of the jet engine with highly efficient Diesel combustion chambers. In practice, it was much too difficult to couple the diesel power output back into the turbine cycle. The maximum practical power of the Nomad was 4,000 hp (3.0 MW), and it was much heavier than a pure jet of the same power. By this time civilian jets such as the Boeing 707 were nearing completion, and the Nomad was never seriously considered by any aircraft manufacturer.

Nomad I

[edit]
Schematic drawing of Napier Nomad I and II.

The initial Nomad design (E.125) or Nomad 1 was incredibly complex, almost two engines in one. One was a turbo-supercharged two-stroke diesel, having some resemblance to half of a Napier Sabre's H-24. Mounted below this were the rotating parts of a turboprop engine, based on the Naiad design, the output of which drove the front propeller of a contra-rotating pair. To achieve higher boost, the crankshaft drove a centrifugal supercharger, which also provided the scavenging needed for starting the engine from rest. During take-off additional fuel was injected into the rear turbine stage for more power, and turned off once the aircraft was cruising.[3]

The compressor and turbine assemblies of the Nomad were tested during 1948, and the complete unit was run in October 1949. The prototype was installed in the nose of an Avro Lincoln heavy bomber for testing: it first flew in 1950 and appeared at the Farnborough Air Display on 10 September 1951.[4] In total the Nomad I ran for just over 1,000 hours, and proved to be rather temperamental, but when running properly it could produce 3,000 hp (2.2 MW) and 320 lbf (1.4 kN) thrust. It had a specific fuel consumption (sfc) of 0.36 lb/(hp⋅h) (220 g/kWh).

The prototype Nomad I is on display at the National Museum of Flight at East Fortune Airfield in Scotland.

Nomad II

[edit]
Front three-quarter view of a Nomad II
Topside view

Even before the Nomad I was running, its successor, the Nomad II (E.145) Nomad 6, had already been designed. In this version an extra stage was added to the axial compressor/supercharger, eliminating the separate centrifugal part and the intercooler. The turbine (which also received an additional stage) was now only used to drive the compressor, and feed back any excess power to the main shaft using a Beier variable-ratio gear;[5] the separate propeller from the turbine was deleted, just as the whole of the "afterburner" system with its valves etc. So the system was now like a combination of a mechanical supercharger, and a turbocharger without any need for bypass. The result was smaller and considerably simpler: a single engine driving a single propeller.[6] Overall weight reduction was 1,000 lb (450 kg). The wet liners of the cylinders of the Nomad I were changed for dry liners.[7]

While the Nomad II was undergoing testing, a prototype Avro Shackleton was lent to Napier as a testbed. The engine proved bulky, like the Nomad I before it, and in the meantime several dummy engines were used on the Shackleton for various tests.

On an equivalent power basis, the Nomad II had an SFC of 0.327 lb/(hp⋅h) (199 g/kWh) at 25,000 ft (7,600 m) cruise altitude.[8]

A further development, the Nomad Nm.7, of 3,500 shp (2.6 MW) was announced in 1953.[9]

By 1954 interest in the Nomad was waning, and after the only project, the Avro Type 719 Shackleton IV, based on it was cancelled, work on the engine was ended in April 1955, after an expenditure of £5.1 million. The design was also considered for the Canadair Argus, a similar maritime patrol aircraft being designed for the Royal Canadian Air Force. This design turned to the Wright R-3350, the design the Nomad was intending to best.

A Nomad II is on display at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia.[10]

Applications

[edit]

Specifications (Nomad II)

[edit]

Data from Flight 1954[12]

General characteristics

Components

Performance

  • Power output: 3,150 hp (2,350 kW) max take-off at 89 psi (610 kPa) boost not including 320 lbf residual thrust from the turbine at 2,050 rpm (crankshaft) and 18,200 rpm (turbine)
  • Specific power: 1.25 hp/in3 (57 kW/L)
  • Compression ratio: 8.1 (cylinder ratio), 31.5:1 (overall pressure ratio)
  • Specific fuel consumption: 0.345 lb/(ehp·h) (0.210 kg/(kW·h)) (combined unit) at 11,000 ft and 300 kn
  • Power-to-weight ratio: 0.88 hp/lb (1.45 kW/kg)

Turbine section

[edit]

General characteristics

Components

Performance

See also

[edit]

Comparable engines

Related lists

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gunston, Bill (1989). World Encyclopaedia of Aero Engines. Cambridge, England: Patrick Stephens. p. 106. ISBN 1-85260-163-9.
  2. ^ "Cancelled projects: the list up-dated". Flight: 262. 17 August 1967. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
  3. ^ Lumsden (2003), p. 170.
  4. ^ Lumsden (2003), p. 172.
  5. ^ Flight (30 April 1954), p. 549.
  6. ^ Lumsden (2003), p. 171.
  7. ^ Flight (30 April 1954), p. 550.
  8. ^ Ferguson, Hamish (September 1954). "What's going on in England: Napier Nomad". Diesel Progress. pp. 56, 58. ISSN 1040-8878.
  9. ^ "Here and there" (PDF). Flight. 6 November 1953. p. 610. Archived from the original on 13 April 2016.
  10. ^ Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center - Napier Nomad Retrieved: 7 April 2020
  11. ^ "Aircraft intelligence: Great Britain" (PDF). Flight: 485. 17 April 1953. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
  12. ^ Gunston, Bill (30 April 1954). "Napier Nomad: An engine of outstanding efficiency". Flight: 543–551. Archived from the original on 8 October 2012. Retrieved 18 December 2009.
[edit]