Jump to content

User talk:Sophia: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
^^James^^ (talk | contribs)
779 edits
→Hello Again: new section
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
Bots
6,486,012 edits
m Substing templates: {{WikiProject US Counties}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Culture}}
{{WikiProject Royalty and Nobility}}
{{WikiProject Germany}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=low|U.S. counties=yes|U.S. counties-importance=}}
<div style="position: absolute; top: 50px; right: 100px; z-index: 2">[[Image:Bouncywikilogo.gif|{{{1|100}}}px]]</div>
<div style="position: absolute; top: 50px; right: 100px; z-index: 2">[[Image:Bouncywikilogo.gif|{{{1|100}}}px]]</div>
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive1|Archive 1]] From 6th Jan 2006 to 6th March 2006
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive1|Archive 1]] From 6th Jan 2006 to 6th March 2006
Line 6: Line 10:
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive5|Archive 5]] From 8th October 2006 to 14th June 2007
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive5|Archive 5]] From 8th October 2006 to 14th June 2007
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive6|Archive 6]] From 14th June 2007 to 25th May 2008
*[[User talk:SOPHIA/archive6|Archive 6]] From 14th June 2007 to 25th May 2008
*[[User talk:Sophia/archive7|Archive 7]] From 25th May 2008 to 25th September 2011


== Jesus Myth discussion ==
== You're back! ==


You're back? Yes? Say yes! So good to see you on my feed!!! [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 22:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
As on the talk page, I understand that that was one of the points that was raised (the general "proponents are not respectable"), but other claims like the one I was talking about were also brought up, and I was trying to figure out what the deal was. Thank you for answering.
:I'm going to try! Life is pretty nuts but there are some articles that interest me and I will try to make time. Good to see you too. [[User:Sophia| <span style="color:purple;">'''Sophia '''♫</span>]] 22:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
::<nowiki>:-) </nowiki> Excellent. I hope r/l is nutty good and interesting, and not nutty bad and crazy-making. [[User:KillerChihuahua|KillerChihuahua]]<small><sup>[[User talk:KillerChihuahua|?!?]]</sup>[[User:Heimstern/Ignoring incivility|Advice]]</small> 23:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
However, I don't really understand how you're pinning the "bringing too much emotion" thing on me - I have been trying to be as neutral as possible on this page, frequently reverting anti-myth material that has no basis and trying to preserve pro-myth material as much as possible, and yet you keep attacking me as biased and seemingly denigrating me for the other kinds of articles I edit (like immediately assuming I'm trying to "apologetics the article out of existence", when even a cursory glance of my edits would show that prediction as ridiculous). I can try to be compromising and keep the discussion on the article, but at a certain point it's impossible for me to not get annoyed when I am near constantly attacked by you and certain other of the article's editors.<small>[[User:KrytenKoro|Not even Mr. Lister's]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|Koromon survived intact.]]</small> 07:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:...And I don't remember "crusading" for the Gospels to be taken as the ultimate source on that page. In fact, the closest thing to it that I can remember is claiming that the earliest of the canon Gospels were written in the first century, which is accepted by most historians. My question had been that earlier discussion had complained about ''any'' criticism (the topic starter specifically mentioned the "reputable" bit, but the discussion as a whole covered any criticism) being in certain sections of the article. That's it. No asking for a greenlight to remove the article, as you accused, just a question of what the positions currently were, so that, for example, I knew whether an editor adding quotes or info against the theory in a section should be reverted as POV, or merely have the edit checked and integrated.
::As I said, I'm doing my best to be as un-biased as I can be on that article, and all I'm asking you to do is to not attack me every step of the way. I honestly can't see anything I've done on the article that would warrant the things you accuse me of.<small>[[User:KrytenKoro|Not even Mr. Lister's]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|Koromon survived intact.]]</small> 17:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
:::...I understand that I don't have as much expertise in the topic as you, and have read less applicable books. I've never disputed that, as far as I can see. That's why I've studiously ''avoided'' editing any of the parts of the article that are out of my depth - I generally stick to vandalism reversion and general copyediting. In fact, I think I've actually made more edits which would be considered pro-myth than anti-myth on that article. I'm not asking to be given as much authority as you, I'm not asking for anyone to view me as ''any'' kind of authority on the subject - I'm just asking for you not to constantly attack me, since, again, I can't see where I've "overstepped my bounds" or done anything to actually warrant the accusations you've made towards me.<small>[[User:KrytenKoro|Not even Mr. Lister's]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|Koromon survived intact.]]</small> 22:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Have you seen the [[Jesus myth hypothesis]] article lately? I think we are finally making some progress and I remember your input on the talk page and tha tyou had been involved with it for 2 years. It would be good to see some old hands return now that the article seems to actually be going somewhere.--[[User:BruceGrubb|BruceGrubb]] ([[User talk:BruceGrubb|talk]]) 08:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 -->
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:SOPHIApets5.jpg]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]


The file [[:File:SOPHIApets5.jpg]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
== HK30 ==
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote>
He is HK30. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 01:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
:Two reasons. The first is the decision of "[[User:Professor33]]" to contact "[[User:HK30]]". They didn't overlap as editors (HK30 was blocked in May2006, Professor33 wasn't created until June 2006). HK30 posted this "email" over at Wikipedia review. Giovanni33 admits to being Professor33 even though at the time he denied it is as vocally as he denies his other, more recent, sock puppets. Professor33 "contacted" HK30 for "help" to get unblocked. The only other people he contacted were admins. In the email and in other places, Professor33 published the material that HK30 was banned over. In reality, HK30 and Professor33 are the same person (according to MusicalLinguist as well) and he used the HK30 to publish the "email" at Wikipedia review. It was practically the only thing that HK30 did at Wikipedia Review and he used that account because it was already banned at Wikipedia indefinitely. here's more evidence [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Musical_Linguist/Easter] but you've probably seen this. Giovanni33 has also admitted that ML was correct about his sockpuppets. His denial about HK30 is not credible given all of his admissions, the evidence that link all the accounts he has admitted to, the coincidences and the material being published by his sockpuppets being so similar (including the outing information). --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 14:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
::I don't think Giovanni is SimplePilgrim or TrollWatcher, though I haven't looked at them closely. I think he got caught up with them when they were doing their stuff and helped them. Here's the most compelling sequence of edits that introduces HK30 (HK30 is a play on another users name KHM03, which is similar to other SP accounts he's admitted to).
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48084090 G33 edit]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48085699 G33 revert]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48086933 G33 revert]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48140172 IP revert from Bay Area (G33 is from Bay Area)]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48141625 Same IP revert]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48142875 Same IP revert]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48149630 First edit by HK30 ever, revert to IP, same day as the other reverts]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48150520 Second revert HK30]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48151618 3rd revert HK30]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48152356 4th revert HK30]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48155338 5th Revert HK30]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48203386 G33 returns]
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity&diff=next&oldid=48304301 HK30 reverts]
[http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=2376&hl=HK30 Here's] the WR post.
It's just not believable that they aren't the same person given the circumstances and the fact that he's admitted to all the other ones that Musical Linguist identified and this one fits the pattern of his other ones in terms of account name and linguistic clues. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 22:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].
Read [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Professor33&oldid=69388927#prognostication.3F this rant] where the "Professor" talks about the sites that you are concerned about and also protests how innocent he is. Then read this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FGiovanni33%2FWorkshop&diff=221036713&oldid=221032674]. I think this is the first time he's actually admitted to this sockpuppet, previously only admitting that he used sockpuppets in the past and only admitting to the confirmed checkuser cases. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward|talk]]) 23:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:SOPHIApets5.jpg|the file's talk page]].
== Thanks and bye for now ==


Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
Dear Sophia, you welcomed me some time ago at Wikipedia. Thank you for this but I can see that I will "leave" for some indefinite time. I tried to contribute to the Jesus Myth (and historicity), in a way which I felt similar to yours. But I must say I am giving up now, it is so time consuming, and in some sense hopeless. I will let evolution do her work by herself :-) Good luck in your further endeavours![[User:Jelamkorj|Jelamkorj]] ([[User talk:Jelamkorj|talk]]) 12:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Page history|page history]] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 01:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
==Conflict of interest==

Sorry, but I don't think it's rude and it makes sense to me. You're not making a credible case that being an atheist does not give you a conflict of interest. Being an atheist gives you a conflict of interest with any of the Biblical claims just as it gives you a conflict of interest with any religious claims. It's possible for an atheist to accept the historicity of Jesus in the same way that it's possible for a Christian to reject the existence of a personal God or that Jesus didn't rise from the grave (as some Christians do). That doesn't change the fact that is in the best interest of an atheist to deny the truth claims of any religious work. You can't tell me there's no conflict of interest. Do you think it's a sheer coincidence that those who assert the Jesus Myth are all atheists? Where are all the Jews, Buddhists, and Hindus denying that Jesus ever existed? They have absolutely no stake in his existence whatever, and the Jews in particular have a stake in his non-historicity. You really seem to think that atheists are incapable of personal bias and are uniformly objective in their assessment of evidence and issues which infringe on their worldview. That's just not realistic. But all of this is beside the point. The fact remains that a case has been made which is entirely falsifiable. All you have to do is falsify it. --[[User:Taiwan boi|Taiwan boi]] ([[User talk:Taiwan boi|talk]]) 14:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
:Ok, so you chose not to respond to any of this, except to repeat your demand that I don't 'refactor' your posts. I'm going to repeat the point. The fact remains that a case has been made which is entirely falsifiable. All you have to do is falsify it. --[[User:Taiwan boi|Taiwan boi]] ([[User talk:Taiwan boi|talk]]) 23:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

==CfD nomination of Category:Brights==

[[Image:Info non-talk.png|left|36px|]]'''[[:Category:Brights]]''', which you created, has been nominated for [[Wikipedia:Category deletion policy|deletion]], [[:Category:Categories for merging|merging]], or [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)|renaming]]. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 26#Category:Brights|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Cgingold|Cgingold]] ([[User talk:Cgingold|talk]]) 14:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

: The [[Brights movement]] seems to be a British thing. I once said, "I seem to be pretty bright (intelligent) but not too Bright (naturalistic thinking)." In other words, I don;t seem to have much cnfidence in my sense of common Sense.

:Can you tell that my typing skills are rusty? I wish I could hire someone to take [[dictation]],

:I would like you to send word to my sister, Dawn Marie Vanderhyde, nvywfe72@ yahoo.com, NAVy WiFE, DMV, &c. She is my [[durable power of attorney]] for medical affairs. We've talked enough that she knows I consuder you to be another sister, or at least a [[J. R. R. Tolkien|tolkienish]] Elf-friend. Dawn knows who SOPHIA is, anyway. I'm going down the membershio roll at [[User:Archola/The_Centrist_Fellowship]]. [[Scooby Gang|Dawny Dawny Doo, where are you?]]

:I am suffering from [[lung cancer]] that invaded the [[human brain]] and required [[brain surgery]]. Trying to [[coordinate]] [[information]] in my [[environment]] is like waiting for the [[Pony Express]]. (Coordination is going to be difficult suce the lung tumor invaded my brain through the [[Cerebellum]]-[[Spinocerebellar tract]] complex. Oh, joy! Not to mention that I heard the doctors here at [[Skilled Neurosurgery]] discussing with my sis that they were planning to remove a bone from my skull and let my neck muscles support the back of my head.

== WikiProject History of Science newsletter : Issue V - January 2009 ==

It's here at long last! The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Newsletter/January 2009|January 2009 issue]]''' of the ''WikiProject History of Science newsletter'' is ready, with exciting news about [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Darwin Day 2009|Darwin Day 2009]]. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --[[User:Ragesoss|ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 02:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

== [[Nicholas Beale]] ==

Hi Sophia, I believe you've been involved before in determining whether [[Nicholas Beale]] fits our notability criteria. Although the article was deleted, the subject has moved it back into mainspace. Would you mind taking a look at the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:NBeale here] and offering an opinion, if you have time? Many thanks, <font color="green">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="pink">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 00:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

== Hello Again ==

Not much has changed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Acharya_S&diff=334981763&oldid=334950427]. I think we went over this a few years ago. Take care, [[User:^^James^^|^^James^^]] ([[User talk:^^James^^|talk]]) 21:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:03, 4 June 2024

WikiProject iconCulture NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconRoyalty and Nobility
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
WikiProject iconGermany NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: U.S. counties NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.
  • Archive 1 From 6th Jan 2006 to 6th March 2006
  • Archive 2 From 6th March 2006 to 15th April 2006
  • Archive 3 From 16th April 2006 to 6th July 2006
  • Archive 4 From 6th July 2006 to 8th October 2006
  • Archive 5 From 8th October 2006 to 14th June 2007
  • Archive 6 From 14th June 2007 to 25th May 2008
  • Archive 7 From 25th May 2008 to 25th September 2011

You're back!

[edit]

You're back? Yes? Say yes! So good to see you on my feed!!! KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 22:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try! Life is pretty nuts but there are some articles that interest me and I will try to make time. Good to see you too. Sophia ♫ 22:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
:-) Excellent. I hope r/l is nutty good and interesting, and not nutty bad and crazy-making. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 23:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SOPHIApets5.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:SOPHIApets5.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sophia&oldid=1227297143"