Jump to content

De facto embassy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: date, title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Mako001 | #UCB_webform 549/2323
m clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation, replaced: , → , (5)
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2016}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2016}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''De facto'' embassy}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''De facto'' embassy}}
A '''''de facto'' embassy''' is an office or organisation that serves ''[[de facto]]'' as an [[Diplomatic mission|embassy]] in the absence of normal or official diplomatic relations among countries, usually to represent nations which lack full diplomatic recognition, regions or dependencies of countries, or territories over which sovereignty is disputed. In some cases, [[diplomatic immunity]] and [[extraterritoriality]] may be granted.<ref>[http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201302050036.aspx New Taiwan-U.S. diplomatic immunity pact a positive move: scholar], ''[[Focus Taiwan]]'', 12 February 2013</ref>
A '''''de facto'' embassy''' is an office or organisation that serves ''[[de facto]]'' as an [[Diplomatic mission|embassy]] in the absence of normal or official diplomatic relations among countries, usually to represent nations which lack full diplomatic recognition, regions or dependencies of countries, or territories over which sovereignty is disputed. In some cases, [[diplomatic immunity]] and [[extraterritoriality]] may be granted.<ref>[http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201302050036.aspx New Taiwan-U.S. diplomatic immunity pact a positive move: scholar] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824222519/http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201302050036.aspx |date=24 August 2017 }}, ''[[Focus Taiwan]]'', 12 February 2013</ref>


Alternatively, states which have broken off direct [[bilateralism|bilateral ties]] will be represented by an "interests section" of another embassy, belonging to a third country that has agreed to serve as a [[protecting power]] and is recognised by both states. When relations are exceptionally tense, such as during a war, the interests section is staffed by diplomats from the protecting power. For example, when Iraq and the U.S. broke diplomatic relations due to the [[Gulf War]], Poland became the protecting power for the United States. The [[Embassy of the United States in Baghdad#Old embassy|United States Interests Section of the Polish Embassy]] in Iraq was headed by a Polish diplomat.<ref>[http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2003/18083.htm Former Polish Director of U.S. Interests Section in Baghdad Krzysztof Bernacki Receives the Secretary's Award for Distinguished Service], [[Department of State of the United States of America|Department of State]], 28 February 2003</ref> However, if the host country agrees, an interests section may be staffed by diplomats from the sending country. From 1977 to 2015, the [[United States Interests Section in Havana]] was staffed by Americans, even though it was formally a section of the Swiss Embassy to Cuba.
Alternatively, states which have broken off direct [[bilateralism|bilateral ties]] will be represented by an "interests section" of another embassy, belonging to a third country that has agreed to serve as a [[protecting power]] and is recognised by both states. When relations are exceptionally tense, such as during a war, the interests section is staffed by diplomats from the protecting power. For example, when Iraq and the U.S. broke diplomatic relations due to the [[Gulf War]], Poland became the protecting power for the United States. The [[Embassy of the United States in Baghdad#Old embassy|United States Interests Section of the Polish Embassy]] in Iraq was headed by a Polish diplomat.<ref>[http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2003/18083.htm Former Polish Director of U.S. Interests Section in Baghdad Krzysztof Bernacki Receives the Secretary's Award for Distinguished Service] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308200003/http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2003/18083.htm |date=8 March 2016 }}, [[Department of State of the United States of America|Department of State]], 28 February 2003</ref> However, if the host country agrees, an interests section may be staffed by diplomats from the sending country. From 1977 to 2015, the [[United States Interests Section in Havana]] was staffed by Americans, even though it was formally a section of the Swiss Embassy to Cuba.


Governments of [[List of states with limited recognition|states not recognized by the receiving state]] and of territories that make no claim to be sovereign states may set up offices abroad that do not have official diplomatic status as defined by the Vienna Convention. Examples include the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office]]s; [[Somaliland]]'s Representative Offices in London, [[Addis Ababa]], Rome, and [[Washington, D.C.]]; the [[Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office]]s that represent the government of that territory; and [[Gibraltar House]], [[Representative of Bermuda, London|Bermuda House]] and [[Falkland Islands Government Office, London|Falkland House]] in London, representing the three dependent territories in their "motherland". Such offices assume some of the non-diplomatic functions of diplomatic posts, such as promoting trade interests and providing assistance to its citizens and residents. They are nevertheless not diplomatic missions, their personnel are not diplomats and do not have diplomatic visas, although there may be legislation providing for personal immunities and tax privileges, as in the case of the Hong Kong offices in London and Toronto, for example.
Governments of [[List of states with limited recognition|states not recognized by the receiving state]] and of territories that make no claim to be sovereign states may set up offices abroad that do not have official diplomatic status as defined by the Vienna Convention. Examples include the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office]]s; [[Somaliland]]'s Representative Offices in London, [[Addis Ababa]], Rome, and [[Washington, D.C.]]; the [[Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office]]s that represent the government of that territory; and [[Gibraltar House]], [[Representative of Bermuda, London|Bermuda House]] and [[Falkland Islands Government Office, London|Falkland House]] in London, representing the three dependent territories in their "motherland". Such offices assume some of the non-diplomatic functions of diplomatic posts, such as promoting trade interests and providing assistance to its citizens and residents. They are nevertheless not diplomatic missions, their personnel are not diplomats and do not have diplomatic visas, although there may be legislation providing for personal immunities and tax privileges, as in the case of the Hong Kong offices in London and Toronto, for example.
Line 24: Line 24:
Many countries maintain formal diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China but operate unofficial "trade missions" or "representative offices" in Taipei to deal with [[Foreign relations of the Republic of China|Taiwan-related commercial and consular issues]]. Often, these delegations may forward visa applications to their nearest embassy or consulate rather than processing them locally.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20110616133351/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MF14Ad01.html ''De facto'' embassies in Taipei folding the flag], ''[[Asia Times]]'', 14 June 2011</ref>
Many countries maintain formal diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China but operate unofficial "trade missions" or "representative offices" in Taipei to deal with [[Foreign relations of the Republic of China|Taiwan-related commercial and consular issues]]. Often, these delegations may forward visa applications to their nearest embassy or consulate rather than processing them locally.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20110616133351/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MF14Ad01.html ''De facto'' embassies in Taipei folding the flag], ''[[Asia Times]]'', 14 June 2011</ref>


When the United States recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate entity of "China" in 1979, it established a non-governmental body known as the [[American Institute in Taiwan]], to serve its interests on the island. By contrast, other countries were represented by privately operated bodies; the United Kingdom was informally represented by the "Anglo-Taiwan Trade Committee", while France was similarly represented by a "Trade Office".<ref name="hibou">[https://books.google.com/books?id=UdsBUEQa6qIC&lpg=PA157&ots=bFUV9aZtm9&dq=%22Anglo-Taiwan%20Trade%20Committee%22%201976%20visa&pg=PA157#v=onepage&q=%22Anglo-Taiwan%20Trade%20Committee%22%201976%20visa&f=true ''Privatising the State''], [[Béatrice Hibou]], C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 2004, pages 157–158</ref>
When the United States recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate entity of "China" in 1979, it established a non-governmental body known as the [[American Institute in Taiwan]] to serve its interests on the island. By contrast, other countries were represented by privately operated bodies; the United Kingdom was informally represented by the "Anglo-Taiwan Trade Committee", while France was similarly represented by a "Trade Office".<ref name="hibou">[https://books.google.com/books?id=UdsBUEQa6qIC&dq=%22Anglo-Taiwan+Trade+Committee%22+1976+visa&pg=PA157 ''Privatising the State''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124558/https://books.google.com/books?id=UdsBUEQa6qIC&dq=%22Anglo-Taiwan+Trade+Committee%22+1976+visa&pg=PA157 |date=30 March 2023 }}, [[Béatrice Hibou]], C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 2004, pages 157–158</ref>
[[File:Sign stone of Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association 20190901.jpg|thumb|[[Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association]] in Taipei.]]
[[File:Sign stone of Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association 20190901.jpg|thumb|[[Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association]] in Taipei.]]
These were later renamed the "British Trade and Cultural Office" and "French Institute" respectively, and, were headed by career diplomats on secondment, rather than being operated by chambers of commerce or trade departments.<ref name="hibou"/>
These were later renamed the "British Trade and Cultural Office" and "French Institute" respectively, and, were headed by career diplomats on secondment, rather than being operated by chambers of commerce or trade departments.<ref name="hibou"/>


France now maintains a "[[French Office in Taipei]]", with cultural, consular and economic sections,<ref>[http://www.france-taipei.org/ La France à Taiwan]</ref> while the "[[British Office Taipei|British Office]]"<ref>[https://www.gov.uk/government/world/taiwan British Office]</ref> and [[German Institute Taipei]]<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://taipei.diplo.de/tw-en |title=German Institute Taipei |access-date=19 January 2020 }}</ref> perform similar functions on behalf of the United Kingdom and Germany.
France now maintains a "[[French Office in Taipei]]", with cultural, consular and economic sections,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.france-taipei.org/ |title=La France à Taiwan |access-date=30 January 2016 |archive-date=2 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102070424/https://france-taipei.org/ |url-status=live }}</ref> while the "[[British Office Taipei|British Office]]"<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/world/taiwan |title=British Office |access-date=29 January 2016 |archive-date=3 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203050935/https://www.gov.uk/government/world/taiwan |url-status=live }}</ref> and [[German Institute Taipei]]<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://taipei.diplo.de/tw-en |title=German Institute Taipei |access-date=19 January 2020 |archive-date=18 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200318113935/https://taipei.diplo.de/tw-en |url-status=live }}</ref> perform similar functions on behalf of the United Kingdom and Germany.


Other countries which have broken off diplomatic relations with Taiwan also established ''de facto'' missions. In 1972, Japan established the "Interchange Association, Japan" (renamed the "[[Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association]]" in 2017),<ref>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Mao-sen|title=Foreign ministry supports name change|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/12/29/2003662107|access-date=29 December 2016|work=Taipei Times|date=29 December 2016}}</ref> headed by personnel "on leave" from the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Japan)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=s6KaAAAAIAAJ&lpg=PA125&ots=h_OoRlfhGD&dq=Interchange%20Association%2C%20Japan%201972&pg=PA125#v=onepage&q=Interchange%20Association,%20Japan%201972&f=false ''The International Energy Relations of China''], Kim Woodard
Other countries which have broken off diplomatic relations with Taiwan also established ''de facto'' missions. In 1972, Japan established the "Interchange Association, Japan" (renamed the "[[Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association]]" in 2017),<ref>{{cite news|last1=Chang|first1=Mao-sen|title=Foreign ministry supports name change|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/12/29/2003662107|access-date=29 December 2016|work=Taipei Times|date=29 December 2016|archive-date=29 December 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161229032243/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/12/29/2003662107|url-status=live}}</ref> headed by personnel "on leave" from the [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Japan)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=s6KaAAAAIAAJ&dq=Interchange+Association%2C+Japan+1972&pg=PA125 ''The International Energy Relations of China''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124540/https://books.google.com/books?id=s6KaAAAAIAAJ&dq=Interchange+Association,+Japan+1972&pg=PA125 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Kim Woodard
Stanford University Press, 1980, page 125</ref> This became known as the "Japanese formula", and would be adopted by other countries like the [[Philippines]] in 1975, which established the "Asian Exchange Center", replacing its former Embassy.<ref name="Mosher" /> This was renamed the "[[Manila Economic and Cultural Office]]" in 1989.<ref name="Enduring Dynamics" />
Stanford University Press, 1980, page 125</ref> This became known as the "Japanese formula", and would be adopted by other countries like the [[Philippines]] in 1975, which established the "Asian Exchange Center", replacing its former embassy.<ref name="Mosher" /> This was renamed the "[[Manila Economic and Cultural Office]]" in 1989.<ref name="Enduring Dynamics" />


Australia ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, but did not establish an "Australian Commerce and Industry Office" until 1981.<ref name="millar">[https://books.google.com/books?id=9UKL7t8BAGYC&pg=PA244 ''The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate: 1962–1983''], Ann Millar, UNSW Press, 2000, page 244</ref> This was under control of the Australian Chamber of Commerce.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=YNGzAAAAIAAJ&q=%22australian+commerce+and+industry+office%22+taipei+market&dq=%22australian+commerce+and+industry+office%22+taipei+market&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj86Kv3sIvLAhXKPRQKHRERBOgQ6AEIITAB ''Prospects for Australian Seafood Exports: A Case Study of the Taiwanese Market''], Malcolm Tull
Australia ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, but did not establish an "Australian Commerce and Industry Office" until 1981.<ref name="millar">[https://books.google.com/books?id=9UKL7t8BAGYC&pg=PA244 ''The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate: 1962–1983''], Ann Millar, UNSW Press, 2000, page 244</ref> This was under control of the Australian Chamber of Commerce.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=YNGzAAAAIAAJ&q=%22australian+commerce+and+industry+office%22+taipei+market ''Prospects for Australian Seafood Exports: A Case Study of the Taiwanese Market''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124557/https://books.google.com/books?id=YNGzAAAAIAAJ&q=%22australian+commerce+and+industry+office%22+taipei+market |date=30 March 2023 }}, Malcolm Tull
Asia Research Centre on Social, Political, and Economic Change, Murdoch University, 1993, page 10</ref> It was renamed the "[[Australian Office in Taipei]]" in 2012.<ref name="Taipei Times">[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/print/2012/05/30/2003534092 Australian office renamed], ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 30 May 2012</ref> By contrast, [[New Zealand]], which also ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, did not establish the "[[New Zealand Commerce and Industry Office]]" in Taipei until 1989.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=6Yu6AAAAIAAJ&q=%22New+Zealand+Commerce+and+Industry+Office%22+taipei+1990&dq=%22New+Zealand+Commerce+and+Industry+Office%22+taipei+1990&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiF_qbLh4rLAhXJyRQKHaTlBdAQ6AEITzAJ ''Republic of China Yearbook Taiwan''], Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1989, page 227</ref>
Asia Research Centre on Social, Political, and Economic Change, Murdoch University, 1993, page 10</ref> It was renamed the "[[Australian Office in Taipei]]" in 2012.<ref name="Taipei Times">[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/print/2012/05/30/2003534092 Australian office renamed] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190508010707/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/print/2012/05/30/2003534092 |date=8 May 2019 }}, ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 30 May 2012</ref> By contrast, [[New Zealand]], which also ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, did not establish the "[[New Zealand Commerce and Industry Office]]" in Taipei until 1989.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=6Yu6AAAAIAAJ&q=%22New+Zealand+Commerce+and+Industry+Office%22+taipei+1990 ''Republic of China Yearbook Taiwan''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115443/https://books.google.com/books?id=6Yu6AAAAIAAJ&q=%22New+Zealand+Commerce+and+Industry+Office%22+taipei+1990 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1989, page 227</ref>


[[South Korea]], which broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1992, has been represented by the "[[Korean Mission in Taipei]]" since 1993.<ref>[http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14674&CtNode=122 Seoul tries to mend Taipei tie] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307042046/http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14674&CtNode=122 |date=7 March 2016 }}, ''[[Taiwan Today]]'', 8 November 1996</ref> South Africa, which ended diplomatic ties in 1998, is represented by the "[[Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa]]".<ref>[http://www.southafrica.org.tw/ Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa]</ref>
[[South Korea]], which broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1992, has been represented by the "[[Korean Mission in Taipei]]" since 1993.<ref>[http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14674&CtNode=122 Seoul tries to mend Taipei tie] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307042046/http://www.taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14674&CtNode=122 |date=7 March 2016 }}, ''[[Taiwan Today]]'', 8 November 1996</ref> South Africa, which ended diplomatic ties in 1998, is represented by the "[[Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa]]".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.southafrica.org.tw/ |title=Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa |access-date=12 February 2016 |archive-date=19 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150419054832/http://www.southafrica.org.tw/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


[[India]], which has always had diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, established an "[[India–Taipei Association]]" in 1995, which is also authorised to provide consular and passport services.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.india.org.tw/about_history_en.aspx |title=About Us – India-Taipei Association |access-date=4 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161107082944/http://www.india.org.tw/about_history_en.aspx |archive-date=7 November 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
[[India]], which has always had diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, established an "[[India–Taipei Association]]" in 1995, which is also authorised to provide consular and passport services.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.india.org.tw/about_history_en.aspx |title=About Us – India-Taipei Association |access-date=4 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161107082944/http://www.india.org.tw/about_history_en.aspx |archive-date=7 November 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Singapore, despite [[Singapore–Taiwan relations|close ties]] with Taiwan, did not establish formal diplomatic relations, although it was the last [[ASEAN]] country to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, in 1990.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ASVwAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22Trade+Representative+Office+in+Taipei%22+in+1979&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=upgrade ''Contemporary Southeast Asia''], Volumes 7–8, Singapore University Press, 1985, page 215</ref> Consequently, it only established a "Trade Representative Office" in Taipei in 1979, renamed the "[[Singapore Trade Office in Taipei]]" in 1990.<ref name="AJCS">[https://books.google.com/books?id=goN0AAAAIAAJ&dq=%22Singapore+Trade+Office%22+in+Taipei+established&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Trade+Representative+Office%22 ''American Journal of Chinese Studies''], Volumes 3–4, American Association for Chinese Studies, 1996, page 170</ref>
Singapore, despite [[Singapore–Taiwan relations|close ties]] with Taiwan, did not establish formal diplomatic relations, although it was the last [[ASEAN]] country to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, in 1990.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ASVwAAAAMAAJ&q=upgrade ''Contemporary Southeast Asia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115455/https://books.google.com/books?id=ASVwAAAAMAAJ&q=upgrade |date=11 April 2023 }}, Volumes 7–8, Singapore University Press, 1985, page 215</ref> Consequently, it only established a "Trade Representative Office" in Taipei in 1979, renamed the "[[Singapore Trade Office in Taipei]]" in 1990.<ref name="AJCS">[https://books.google.com/books?id=goN0AAAAIAAJ&q=%22Trade+Representative+Office%22 ''American Journal of Chinese Studies''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115450/https://books.google.com/books?id=goN0AAAAIAAJ&q=%22Trade+Representative+Office%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Volumes 3–4, American Association for Chinese Studies, 1996, page 170</ref>


===Taiwan missions in other countries===
===Taiwan missions in other countries===
Line 49: Line 49:
[[File:Trouk.jpg|thumb|Taipei Representative Office in the U.K. in London, United Kingdom, displaying the [[Blue Sky with a White Sun|national emblem of the Republic of China]]]]
[[File:Trouk.jpg|thumb|Taipei Representative Office in the U.K. in London, United Kingdom, displaying the [[Blue Sky with a White Sun|national emblem of the Republic of China]]]]


In 2007, for example, the Irish [[Minister for Foreign Affairs (Ireland)|Minister for Foreign Affairs]], [[Dermot Ahern]], confirmed that Ireland recognised the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China, and that while the Taipei Representative Office in [[Dublin]] had a representative function in relation to economic and cultural promotion, it had no diplomatic or political status.<ref>[http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/takes/dail2007020800069 Written Answers – Diplomatic Relations.] Thursday, 8 February 2007 {{lang|ga|[[Dáil Éireann]]|italic=no}} (Ref No: 3911/07)</ref>
In 2007, for example, the Irish [[Minister for Foreign Affairs (Ireland)|Minister for Foreign Affairs]], [[Dermot Ahern]], confirmed that Ireland recognised the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China, and that while the Taipei Representative Office in [[Dublin]] had a representative function in relation to economic and cultural promotion, it had no diplomatic or political status.<ref>[http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/takes/dail2007020800069 Written Answers – Diplomatic Relations.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170724003924/http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/takes/dail2007020800069 |date=24 July 2017 }} Thursday, 8 February 2007 {{lang|ga|[[Dáil Éireann]]|italic=no}} (Ref No: 3911/07)</ref>


Before the 1990s, the names of these offices would vary considerably from country to country. For example, in the United States, Taipei's mission was known as the "Coordination Council for North American Affairs" (CCNAA),<ref>[http://www.cftc.gov/files/foia/repfoia/foirf0502b010.pdf Memorandum of Understanding between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Coordination Council for North American Affairs on the Exchange of Information Concerning Commodity Futures and Options Matters], Signed at Arlington, Virginia this 11th day of January 1993</ref> in Japan as the "[[Association of East Asian Relations]]" (AEAR),<ref name="Mosher">[https://books.google.com/books?id=3YgR77AzwuEC&pg=PA24 International Law of Recognition and the Status of the Republic of China], Hungdah Chiu, in ''The United States and the Republic of China: Democratic Friends, Strategic Allies, and Economic Partners'', Steven W. Mosher Transaction Publishers, 1992, page 24</ref> in the [[Philippines]] as the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center"<ref name="Mosher" /> and in the United Kingdom as the "Free Chinese Centre".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=wXpwXvjAAkYC&pg=PA39 ''The Cold War's Odd Couple: The Unintended Partnership Between the Republic of China and the UK, 1950–1958''], Steven Tsang, I.B.Tauris, 2006, page 39</ref>
Before the 1990s, the names of these offices would vary considerably from country to country. For example, in the United States, Taipei's mission was known as the "Coordination Council for North American Affairs" (CCNAA),<ref>[http://www.cftc.gov/files/foia/repfoia/foirf0502b010.pdf Memorandum of Understanding between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Coordination Council for North American Affairs on the Exchange of Information Concerning Commodity Futures and Options Matters] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221010211/http://www.cftc.gov/files/foia/repfoia/foirf0502b010.pdf |date=21 December 2016 }}, Signed at Arlington, Virginia this 11th day of January 1993</ref> in Japan as the "[[Association of East Asian Relations]]" (AEAR),<ref name="Mosher">[https://books.google.com/books?id=3YgR77AzwuEC&pg=PA24 International Law of Recognition and the Status of the Republic of China] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115443/https://books.google.com/books?id=3YgR77AzwuEC&pg=PA24 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Hungdah Chiu, in ''The United States and the Republic of China: Democratic Friends, Strategic Allies, and Economic Partners'', Steven W. Mosher Transaction Publishers, 1992, page 24</ref> in the [[Philippines]] as the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center"<ref name="Mosher" /> and in the United Kingdom as the "Free Chinese Centre".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=wXpwXvjAAkYC&pg=PA39 ''The Cold War's Odd Couple: The Unintended Partnership Between the Republic of China and the UK, 1950–1958''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115640/https://books.google.com/books?id=wXpwXvjAAkYC&pg=PA39 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Steven Tsang, I.B.Tauris, 2006, page 39</ref>


However, in May 1992, the AEAR offices in Japan became Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Offices,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=0ksYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Association+of+East+Asian+Relations%22+1992&dq=%22Association+of+East+Asian+Relations%22+1992&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihtNqP-dXKAhXIOBQKHbJoBBMQ6AEINjAE ''Republic of China Yearbook''] Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1998, 145</ref> as did the "Free Chinese Centre" in London.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160203004046/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/foreign-affairs/2013/04/10/375637/Former-diplomats.htm Former diplomats to Great Britain remember Thatcher], ''[[The China Post]]'', 10 April 2013</ref> In September 1994, the [[Clinton Administration]] announced that the CCNAA office in Washington could similarly be called the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=hdTMuHG2hXcC&pg=PA31 ''Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs''], Chi Su Routledge, 2008, page 31</ref>
However, in May 1992, the AEAR offices in Japan became Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Offices,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=0ksYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Association+of+East+Asian+Relations%22+1992 ''Republic of China Yearbook''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411114959/https://books.google.com/books?id=0ksYAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Association+of+East+Asian+Relations%22+1992 |date=11 April 2023 }} Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1998, 145</ref> as did the "Free Chinese Centre" in London.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160203004046/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/foreign-affairs/2013/04/10/375637/Former-diplomats.htm Former diplomats to Great Britain remember Thatcher], ''[[The China Post]]'', 10 April 2013</ref> In September 1994, the [[Clinton Administration]] announced that the CCNAA office in Washington could similarly be called the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=hdTMuHG2hXcC&pg=PA31 ''Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115449/https://books.google.com/books?id=hdTMuHG2hXcC&pg=PA31 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Chi Su Routledge, 2008, page 31</ref>


Earlier in 1989, the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center" in [[Manila]] became the "[[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines]]".<ref name="Enduring Dynamics">[https://books.google.com/books?id=wFxxAAAAMAAJ&dq=Pacific+Economic+and+Cultural+Center+in+Manila+renamed+Taipei+Economic+and+Cultural+Office+1989&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Taipei+Economic+and+Cultural+Office%22 ''Ensuring Interests: Dynamics of China-Taiwan Relations and Southeast Asia''], Khai Leong Ho, Guozhong He, Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya, 2006, page 25</ref> In 1991, the "Taiwan Marketing Service" office in [[Canberra]], Australia, established in 1988, also became a "Taipei Economic and Cultural Office", along with the "Far East Trading Company" offices in Sydney and [[Melbourne]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=esT-P4oEkrUC&pg=PA33 ''Australia and China: Partners in Asia''], Colin Mackerras, Macmillan Education, 1996, page 33</ref>
Earlier in 1989, the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center" in [[Manila]] became the "[[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines]]".<ref name="Enduring Dynamics">[https://books.google.com/books?id=wFxxAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Taipei+Economic+and+Cultural+Office%22 ''Ensuring Interests: Dynamics of China-Taiwan Relations and Southeast Asia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202010956/https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wFxxAAAAMAAJ&dq=Pacific+Economic+and+Cultural+Center+in+Manila+renamed+Taipei+Economic+and+Cultural+Office+1989&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Taipei+Economic+and+Cultural+Office%22 |date=2 February 2017 }}, Khai Leong Ho, Guozhong He, Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya, 2006, page 25</ref> In 1991, the "Taiwan Marketing Service" office in [[Canberra]], Australia, established in 1988, also became a "Taipei Economic and Cultural Office", along with the "Far East Trading Company" offices in Sydney and [[Melbourne]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=esT-P4oEkrUC&pg=PA33 ''Australia and China: Partners in Asia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115450/https://books.google.com/books?id=esT-P4oEkrUC&pg=PA33 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Colin Mackerras, Macmillan Education, 1996, page 33</ref>


Other names are still used elsewhere; for example, Taiwan's mission in Moscow is formally known as the "Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission",<ref>[http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=C527413F7300192A Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission]</ref> the mission in New Delhi is known as the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Center",<ref>[http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=128705 MoU between India-Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in India on cooperation in the field of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises], Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Cabinet, 14 October 2015</ref> while the mission in [[Pretoria]] is known as the "Taipei Liaison Office".<ref>[http://www.roc-taiwan.org/ZA/mp.asp?mp=402 Taipei Liaison Office in the RSA]</ref>
Other names are still used elsewhere; for example, Taiwan's mission in Moscow is formally known as the "Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission",<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=C527413F7300192A |title=Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission |access-date=31 January 2016 |archive-date=22 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822052341/http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=C527413F7300192A |url-status=dead }}</ref> the mission in New Delhi is known as the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Center",<ref>[http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=128705 MoU between India-Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in India on cooperation in the field of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160205000108/http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=128705 |date=5 February 2016 }}, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Cabinet, 14 October 2015</ref> while the mission in [[Pretoria]] is known as the "Taipei Liaison Office".<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.roc-taiwan.org/ZA/mp.asp?mp=402 |title=Taipei Liaison Office in the RSA |access-date=12 February 2016 |archive-date=10 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160310015737/http://www.roc-taiwan.org/ZA/mp.asp?mp=402 |url-status=live }}</ref>


In [[Papua New Guinea]] and [[Fiji]], the Taiwanese missions are known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea"<ref>[http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=4ACFA38B877F185F Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea]</ref> and "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the Republic of Fiji"<ref>[http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=5B78EEBCE18CBE9F Trade Mission of the Republic of China to the Republic of Fiji]</ref> respectively, despite both countries having diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. The [[Taipei Representative Office in Singapore]] was similarly known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China" until 1990.<ref name="AJCS" />
In [[Papua New Guinea]] and [[Fiji]], the Taiwanese missions are known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea"<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=4ACFA38B877F185F |title=Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea |access-date=22 February 2016 |archive-date=7 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307153226/http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=4ACFA38B877F185F |url-status=dead }}</ref> and "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the Republic of Fiji"<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=5B78EEBCE18CBE9F |title=Trade Mission of the Republic of China to the Republic of Fiji |access-date=22 February 2016 |archive-date=7 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307153223/http://www.mofa.gov.tw/EnMobile/OverseasOffice_Detail.aspx?s=5B78EEBCE18CBE9F |url-status=dead }}</ref> respectively, despite both countries having diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. The [[Taipei Representative Office in Singapore]] was similarly known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China" until 1990.<ref name="AJCS" />


In addition, Taiwan maintains "Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices" in Hong Kong and [[Macau]], both [[Special administrative regions of China|Special Administrative Region]]s of the People's Republic of China. Previously, Taiwan was represented in Hong Kong by the "Chung Hwa Travel Service", established in 1966.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2011/07/17/2003508415 Is name change a game changer?], ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 17 July 2011</ref> In Macau, it was represented by the "Taipei Trade and Tourism Office", established in 1989 and renamed the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" in 1999.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2002/01/07/0000118919 Macao allows Taipei office to issue visas to Chinese], ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 7 January 2002</ref> In May 2011, the "Chung Hwa Travel Service" was renamed the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Hong Kong]], and in May 2012, the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" became the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Macau]].<ref>[http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan-relations/2012/05/14/341018/Macau-representative.htm Macau representative office in Taiwan opens] ''The China Post'', 14 May 2012</ref>
In addition, Taiwan maintains "Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices" in Hong Kong and [[Macau]], both [[Special administrative regions of China|Special Administrative Region]]s of the People's Republic of China. Previously, Taiwan was represented in Hong Kong by the "Chung Hwa Travel Service", established in 1966.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2011/07/17/2003508415 Is name change a game changer?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303222005/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2011/07/17/2003508415 |date=3 March 2016 }}, ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 17 July 2011</ref> In Macau, it was represented by the "Taipei Trade and Tourism Office", established in 1989 and renamed the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" in 1999.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2002/01/07/0000118919 Macao allows Taipei office to issue visas to Chinese] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203143153/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/local/archives/2002/01/07/0000118919 |date=3 February 2016 }}, ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 7 January 2002</ref> In May 2011, the "Chung Hwa Travel Service" was renamed the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Hong Kong]], and in May 2012, the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" became the [[Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Macau]].<ref>[http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan-relations/2012/05/14/341018/Macau-representative.htm Macau representative office in Taiwan opens] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150405185318/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan-relations/2012/05/14/341018/Macau-representative.htm |date=5 April 2015 }} ''The China Post'', 14 May 2012</ref>


[[Cross-Strait relations|Relations between Taiwan and China]] are conducted through two quasi-official organisations, the [[Straits Exchange Foundation]] (SEF) in Taipei, and the [[Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits]] (ARATS) in Beijing.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Oq-EAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA153 Human rights as identities: difference and discrimination in Taiwan's China policy], Shih Chih-Yu in ''Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays from the United States and Asia'', Peter Van Ness (ed.), Routledge, 2003, page 153</ref> In 2012, the two organisations' chairmen, [[Lin Join-sane]] and [[Chen Yunlin]] announced talks on opening reciprocal representative offices, but did not commit to a timetable or reach an agreement.<ref>[http://taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=197582&ctNode=2175 SEF, ARATS push for reciprocal rep offices], ''[[Taiwan Today]]'', 17 October 2012</ref> In 2013, President [[Ma Ying-jeou]] outlined plans to establish three SEF representative offices in China, with the ARATS establishing representative offices in Taiwan.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/04/24/2003560582 Ma defends cross-strait offices proposal], ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 24 April 2013</ref> The opposition [[Democratic Progressive Party]] expressed fears that China could use the offices as a channel for intelligence gathering in Taiwan, while China expressed concerns that they could be used as possible gathering areas for student demonstrators.<ref>[http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2015/05/19/436365/PRC-has.htm PRC has qualms over representative offices: Ma] ''The China Post'', 19 May 2015</ref>
[[Cross-Strait relations|Relations between Taiwan and China]] are conducted through two quasi-official organisations, the [[Straits Exchange Foundation]] (SEF) in Taipei, and the [[Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits]] (ARATS) in Beijing.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Oq-EAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA153 Human rights as identities: difference and discrimination in Taiwan's China policy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411125520/https://books.google.com/books?id=Oq-EAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA153 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Shih Chih-Yu in ''Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays from the United States and Asia'', Peter Van Ness (ed.), Routledge, 2003, page 153</ref> In 2012, the two organisations' chairmen, [[Lin Join-sane]] and [[Chen Yunlin]] announced talks on opening reciprocal representative offices, but did not commit to a timetable or reach an agreement.<ref>[http://taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=197582&ctNode=2175 SEF, ARATS push for reciprocal rep offices] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302173821/http://taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=197582&ctNode=2175 |date=2 March 2016 }}, ''[[Taiwan Today]]'', 17 October 2012</ref> In 2013, President [[Ma Ying-jeou]] outlined plans to establish three SEF representative offices in China, with the ARATS establishing representative offices in Taiwan.<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/04/24/2003560582 Ma defends cross-strait offices proposal] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203194659/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/04/24/2003560582 |date=3 February 2016 }}, ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 24 April 2013</ref> The opposition [[Democratic Progressive Party]] expressed fears that China could use the offices as a channel for intelligence gathering in Taiwan, while China expressed concerns that they could be used as possible gathering areas for student demonstrators.<ref>[http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2015/05/19/436365/PRC-has.htm PRC has qualms over representative offices: Ma] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203041945/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2015/05/19/436365/PRC-has.htm |date=3 February 2016 }} ''The China Post'', 19 May 2015</ref>


==Special administrative regions of the People's Republic of China==
==Special administrative regions of the People's Republic of China==
Line 78: Line 78:
<span style="color:#E2750A;">█</span><span style="color:#F7B157;">█</span> <span style="font-size:100%;"> Sydney office and covered countries</span>]]
<span style="color:#E2750A;">█</span><span style="color:#F7B157;">█</span> <span style="font-size:100%;"> Sydney office and covered countries</span>]]


Due to Hong Kong's status as a [[Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China|Special Administrative Region]], [[Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office]]s enjoy some privileges and immunities equivalent to those of a diplomatic mission under legislation passed by host countries such as the United Kingdom,<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/63/schedule The Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Act 1996]</ref> Canada<ref>[http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/SOR-96-207/index.html Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Privileges and Immunities Order]</ref> and Australia.<ref>[http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/F1997B01641 Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 1996]</ref> Under British administration, they were known as Hong Kong Government Offices, and were headed by a Commissioner.<ref>[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/vo961125/text/61125-04.htm Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Bill], ''[[Hansard]]'', 25 November 1996</ref><ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letter-hong-kongs-road-to-democracy-1597713.html LETTER: Hong Kong's road to democracy], ''The Independent'', 23 August 1995</ref>
Due to Hong Kong's status as a [[Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China|Special Administrative Region]], [[Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office]]s enjoy some privileges and immunities equivalent to those of a diplomatic mission under legislation passed by host countries such as the United Kingdom,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/63/schedule |title=The Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Act 1996 |access-date=28 January 2016 |archive-date=25 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160325013045/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/63/schedule |url-status=live }}</ref> Canada<ref>[https://archive.today/20120710103917/http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/SOR-96-207/index.html Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Privileges and Immunities Order]</ref> and Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/F1997B01641 |title=Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 1996 |access-date=28 January 2016 |archive-date=7 June 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607212521/http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/F1997B01641 |url-status=live }}</ref> Under British administration, they were known as Hong Kong Government Offices, and were headed by a Commissioner.<ref>[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/vo961125/text/61125-04.htm Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Bill] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220924170428/https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldhansrd/vo961125/text/61125-04.htm |date=24 September 2022 }}, ''[[Hansard]]'', 25 November 1996</ref><ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letter-hong-kongs-road-to-democracy-1597713.html LETTER: Hong Kong's road to democracy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826034015/http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letter-hong-kongs-road-to-democracy-1597713.html |date=26 August 2017 }}, ''The Independent'', 23 August 1995</ref>


Similarly, foreign [[List of diplomatic missions in Hong Kong|diplomatic missions]] there function independently of their embassies in Beijing, reporting directly to their foreign ministries.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Christopher J. Marut Appointed as Director of the Taipei Office of the American Institute in Taiwan |url=http://www.ait.org.tw/en/pressrelease-pr1224.html |publisher=[[American Institute in Taiwan]] |date=8 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304002648/http://www.ait.org.tw/en/pressrelease-pr1224.html |archive-date=4 March 2016 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2010/HongKong.aspx?lang=eng |title=Inspection of The Canadian Consulate General Hong Kong |access-date=10 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141224173941/http://www.international.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2010/HongKong.aspx?lang=eng |archive-date=24 December 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> For example, the United States [[Consulate General of the United States, Hong Kong|Consulate General]] reports to the [[United States Department of State|Department of State]] with the Consul General as the "Chief of Mission".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/m/dghr/cm |title=Chiefs of Mission |date=8 September 2004 |publisher=[[United States Department of State|U.S. Department of State]]}}</ref>
Similarly, foreign [[List of diplomatic missions in Hong Kong|diplomatic missions]] there function independently of their embassies in Beijing, reporting directly to their foreign ministries.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Christopher J. Marut Appointed as Director of the Taipei Office of the American Institute in Taiwan |url=http://www.ait.org.tw/en/pressrelease-pr1224.html |publisher=[[American Institute in Taiwan]] |date=8 May 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304002648/http://www.ait.org.tw/en/pressrelease-pr1224.html |archive-date=4 March 2016 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.international.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2010/HongKong.aspx?lang=eng |title=Inspection of The Canadian Consulate General Hong Kong |access-date=10 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141224173941/http://www.international.gc.ca/about-a_propos/oig-big/2010/HongKong.aspx?lang=eng |archive-date=24 December 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> For example, the United States [[Consulate General of the United States, Hong Kong|Consulate General]] reports to the [[United States Department of State|Department of State]] with the Consul General as the "Chief of Mission".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/m/dghr/cm |title=Chiefs of Mission |date=8 September 2004 |publisher=[[United States Department of State|U.S. Department of State]] |access-date=25 May 2019 |archive-date=11 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115451/https://2001-2009.state.gov/m/dghr/cm/index.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>


{{gallery | width = 202 | height = 120
{{gallery | width = 202 | height = 120
Line 89: Line 89:
{{Clear}}
{{Clear}}


When Hong Kong was under [[British Hong Kong|British administration]], diplomatic missions of [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] countries, such as Australia,<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19820818&id=ToZWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ueYDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2063,5976865 Australian Commission Office Requirements], ''[[Sydney Morning Herald]]'', 18 August 1982</ref> [[Bangladesh]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PJKZAAAAIAAJ&dq=%22bangladesh+commission%22+hong+kong&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22bangladesh+commission%22++ ''Business Directory of Hong Kong''], Current Publications Company, 1988, page 797</ref> Canada,<ref>[http://articles.latimes.com/1992-09-17/news/mn-783_1_hong-kong 2 China Dissidents Granted Asylum, Fly to Vancouver], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 17 September 1992</ref> [[India]],<ref>[http://www.ipsnews.net/1996/02/hong-kong-indians-in-limbo-as-1997-hand-over-date-draws-nearer/ Indians in Limbo as 1997 Hand-over Date Draws Nearer], ''[[Inter Press Service]]'', 12 February 1996</ref> [[Malaysia]],<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1309&dat=19840703&id=BKRUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6o8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4121,289392 Officials puzzled by Malaysian decision], ''[[New Straits Times]]'', 3 July 1984</ref> [[New Zealand]]<ref>[http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10374547 NZer's credibility under fire in Hong Kong court], ''[[New Zealand Herald]]'', 27 March 2006</ref> [[Nigeria]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=AWG2AAAAIAAJ&q=%22nigerian+commission%22+%22hong+kong%22&dq=%22nigerian+commission%22+%22hong+kong%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj68oCej9XLAhVG0RQKHTsOA0oQ6AEIJTAC ''Asia, Inc: The Region's Business Magazine''], Volume 4, Manager International Company, 1996</ref> and Singapore<ref>[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1989-07-12/news/8902160755_1_singapore-commission-hong-kong-singapore-government Singapore Lure Stirs Crowds In Hong Kong], ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', 12 July 1989</ref> maintained Commissions. However, the Australian Commission was renamed the Consulate-General in 1986.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=nMZmAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22Australian+Commission%22+%22Hong+Kong%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Australian+Commission%22+ ''Australian Foreign Affairs Record''], Volume 56, Issues 7-12, Australian Government Public Service, 1985, page 1153</ref> Following the [[Transfer of the sovereignty of Hong Kong|transfer of sovereignty]] to China in 1997, the remaining Commissions were renamed Consulates-General.<ref>[http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/hong_kong/about_the_consulate_general.html About the Consulate-General]</ref> with the last Commissioner becoming Consul-General.<ref>[http://www.embassymagazine.com/Biog/biog_countries/biog_emb28_malaysia.html In the swing of things] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151023121518/http://www.embassymagazine.com/Biog/biog_countries/biog_emb28_malaysia.html |date=23 October 2015 }}, ''Embassy Magazine'', September 2010</ref>
When Hong Kong was under [[British Hong Kong|British administration]], diplomatic missions of [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] countries, such as Australia,<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19820818&id=ToZWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ueYDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2063,5976865 Australian Commission Office Requirements] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506121641/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19820818&id=ToZWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ueYDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2063,5976865 |date=6 May 2016 }}, ''[[Sydney Morning Herald]]'', 18 August 1982</ref> [[Bangladesh]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PJKZAAAAIAAJ&q=%22bangladesh+commission%22++ ''Business Directory of Hong Kong''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124547/https://books.google.com/books?id=PJKZAAAAIAAJ&q=%22bangladesh+commission%22++ |date=30 March 2023 }}, Current Publications Company, 1988, page 797</ref> Canada,<ref>[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-09-17-mn-783-story.html 2 China Dissidents Granted Asylum, Fly to Vancouver], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 17 September 1992</ref> [[India]],<ref>[http://www.ipsnews.net/1996/02/hong-kong-indians-in-limbo-as-1997-hand-over-date-draws-nearer/ Indians in Limbo as 1997 Hand-over Date Draws Nearer] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200926085714/http://www.ipsnews.net/1996/02/hong-kong-indians-in-limbo-as-1997-hand-over-date-draws-nearer/ |date=26 September 2020 }}, ''[[Inter Press Service]]'', 12 February 1996</ref> [[Malaysia]],<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1309&dat=19840703&id=BKRUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6o8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4121,289392 Officials puzzled by Malaysian decision] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814183452/https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1309&dat=19840703&id=BKRUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6o8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4121,289392 |date=14 August 2021 }}, ''[[New Straits Times]]'', 3 July 1984</ref> [[New Zealand]]<ref>[http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10374547 NZer's credibility under fire in Hong Kong court] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805184324/https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10374547 |date=5 August 2020 }}, ''[[New Zealand Herald]]'', 27 March 2006</ref> [[Nigeria]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=AWG2AAAAIAAJ&q=%22nigerian+commission%22+%22hong+kong%22 ''Asia, Inc: The Region's Business Magazine''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124549/https://books.google.com/books?id=AWG2AAAAIAAJ&q=%22nigerian+commission%22+%22hong+kong%22 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Volume 4, Manager International Company, 1996</ref> and Singapore<ref>[https://www.chicagotribune.com/1989/07/12/singapore-lure-stirs-crowds-in-hong-kong/ Singapore Lure Stirs Crowds In Hong Kong], ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', 12 July 1989</ref> maintained Commissions. However, the Australian Commission was renamed the consulate-general in 1986.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=nMZmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Australian+Commission%22+ ''Australian Foreign Affairs Record''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124549/https://books.google.com/books?id=nMZmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Australian+Commission%22+ |date=30 March 2023 }}, Volume 56, Issues 7-12, Australian Government Public Service, 1985, page 1153</ref> Following the [[Transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong|transfer of sovereignty]] to China in 1997, the remaining Commissions were renamed Consulates-General.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/hong_kong/about_the_consulate_general.html |title=About the Consulate-General |access-date=27 July 2015 |archive-date=29 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151029161528/http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/hong_kong/about_the_consulate_general.html |url-status=live }}</ref> with the last commissioner becoming consul-general.<ref>[http://www.embassymagazine.com/Biog/biog_countries/biog_emb28_malaysia.html In the swing of things] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151023121518/http://www.embassymagazine.com/Biog/biog_countries/biog_emb28_malaysia.html |date=23 October 2015 }}, ''Embassy Magazine'', September 2010</ref>


{{See also|Consular missions in Hong Kong}}
{{See also|Consular missions in Hong Kong}}
Line 98: Line 98:
{{see also|Consular missions in Macau}}
{{see also|Consular missions in Macau}}
[[File:Macau missions.png|thumb|250px|left|Office certified by the local government{{legend|#008000|Countries hosting an office}} {{legend|#0000ff|European Union, members not hosting an individual office}}]]
[[File:Macau missions.png|thumb|250px|left|Office certified by the local government{{legend|#008000|Countries hosting an office}} {{legend|#0000ff|European Union, members not hosting an individual office}}]]
{{clearleft}}
{{clear left}}


{{gallery | width = 202 | height = 120
{{gallery | width = 202 | height = 120
|File:Macau Office.png |Macau Office in Beijing
| |Macau Office in Beijing
|File:Macao.jpg | Macao Economic and Trade Office in Lisbon
|File:Macao.jpg | Macao Economic and Trade Office in Lisbon
|File:ptmoconsulate.JPG | Consulate General of Portugal in Macau
|File:ptmoconsulate.JPG | Consulate General of Portugal in Macau
Line 111: Line 111:


===Northern Cyprus===
===Northern Cyprus===
As the [[Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus]], declared in 1983, is only recognised as an independent state by [[Turkey]], it is represented in other countries by "Representative Offices", most notably in [[London]], [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], [[New York City|New York]], [[Brussels]], [[Islamabad]], [[Abu Dhabi]] and [[Baku]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=FQeVnXmjBzYC&lpg=PA163&dq=trnc%20representative%20offices%20de%20facto%20embassy&pg=PA163#v=onepage&q=trnc%20representative%20offices%20de%20facto%20embassy&f=false ''The Making of Informal States: Statebuilding in Northern Cyprus and Transdniestria''], Daria Isachenko, Palgrave Macmillan, page 163</ref>
As the [[Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus]], declared in 1983, is only recognised as an independent state by [[Turkey]], it is represented in other countries by "Representative Offices", most notably in [[London]], [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]], [[New York City|New York]], [[Brussels]], [[Islamabad]], [[Abu Dhabi]] and [[Baku]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=FQeVnXmjBzYC&dq=trnc+representative+offices+de+facto+embassy&pg=PA163 ''The Making of Informal States: Statebuilding in Northern Cyprus and Transdniestria''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124557/https://books.google.com/books?id=FQeVnXmjBzYC&dq=trnc+representative+offices+de+facto+embassy&pg=PA163 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Daria Isachenko, Palgrave Macmillan, page 163</ref>


===West Germany and East Germany===
===West Germany and East Germany===
Prior to the [[German reunification|reunification]] of Germany, [[West Germany|West]] and [[East Germany]] were each represented by a "permanent mission" (''Ständige Vertretung''),<ref>[http://www.the-berlin-wall.com/videos/west-germanys-permanent-mission-in-east-berlin-635/ History of the Berlin Wall]</ref> in [[East Berlin]] and [[Bonn]] respectively. These were headed by a "permanent representative", who served as a ''[[de facto]]'' ambassador.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0908/090859.html East-West German trade up 8 percent] ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'', 8 September 1982</ref> The permanent missions were established under Article 8 of the [[Basic Treaty, 1972|Basic Treaty]] in 1972.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=QaqeNM7rdDMC&pg=PA23 ''Uniting Germany: Documents and Debates, 1944–1993''], Volker Gransow, Konrad Hugo Jarausch, Berghahn Books, page 23</ref>
Prior to the [[German reunification|reunification]] of Germany, [[West Germany|West]] and [[East Germany]] were each represented by a "permanent mission" (''Ständige Vertretung''),<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.the-berlin-wall.com/videos/west-germanys-permanent-mission-in-east-berlin-635/ |title=History of the Berlin Wall |date=2 May 1974 |access-date=31 January 2016 |archive-date=21 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821070052/https://www.the-berlin-wall.com/videos/west-germanys-permanent-mission-in-east-berlin-635/ |url-status=live }}</ref> in [[East Berlin]] and [[Bonn]] respectively. These were headed by a "permanent representative", who served as a ''[[de facto]]'' ambassador.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0908/090859.html East-West German trade up 8 percent] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190524125441/https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0908/090859.html |date=24 May 2019 }} ''[[The Christian Science Monitor]]'', 8 September 1982</ref> The permanent missions were established under Article 8 of the [[Basic Treaty, 1972|Basic Treaty]] in 1972.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=QaqeNM7rdDMC&pg=PA23 ''Uniting Germany: Documents and Debates, 1944–1993''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115459/https://books.google.com/books?id=QaqeNM7rdDMC&pg=PA23 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Volker Gransow, Konrad Hugo Jarausch, Berghahn Books, page 23</ref>
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1990-1002-018, Berlin, Abhängen des Schilds der Ständigen Vertretung.jpg|thumb|On 2 October 1990, the last head of the West German Permanent Mission in East Germany, Franz Bertele, removes the shield from the office building following German reunification.]]
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1990-1002-018, Berlin, Abhängen des Schilds der Ständigen Vertretung.jpg|thumb|On 2 October 1990, the last head of the West German Permanent Mission in East Germany, Franz Bertele, removes the shield from the office building following German reunification.]]
Previously, West Germany had always claimed to represent the whole of Germany, reflected in the [[Hallstein Doctrine]], which prescribed that the Federal Republic would not establish or maintain diplomatic relations with any state that recognised the GDR.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/1989/sep/15/berlinwall.germany The Two Germanies: Rivals struggle for Germany's soul – As worries surface in Bonn about the influx from the East, there are anxieties across Europe about the likely economic and international effects], ''[[The Guardian]]'', 15 September 1989</ref> Its opposition even extended to any country (such as [[India]]) allowing East Germany to open trade missions on their territory, which Bonn viewed as ''de facto'' recognition of the government in East Berlin.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rlkIBXM7yNYC&pg=PA26 ''Germany's Cold War: The Global Campaign to Isolate East Germany, 1949–1969''], University of North Carolina Press, 2003, page 26</ref>
Previously, West Germany had always claimed to represent the whole of Germany, reflected in the [[Hallstein Doctrine]], which prescribed that the Federal Republic would not establish or maintain diplomatic relations with any state that recognised the GDR.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/1989/sep/15/berlinwall.germany The Two Germanies: Rivals struggle for Germany's soul – As worries surface in Bonn about the influx from the East, there are anxieties across Europe about the likely economic and international effects] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170225214039/https://www.theguardian.com/world/1989/sep/15/berlinwall.germany |date=25 February 2017 }}, ''[[The Guardian]]'', 15 September 1989</ref> Its opposition even extended to any country (such as [[India]]) allowing East Germany to open trade missions on their territory, which Bonn viewed as ''de facto'' recognition of the government in East Berlin.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rlkIBXM7yNYC&pg=PA26 ''Germany's Cold War: The Global Campaign to Isolate East Germany, 1949–1969''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411125626/https://books.google.com/books?id=rlkIBXM7yNYC&pg=PA26 |date=11 April 2023 }}, University of North Carolina Press, 2003, page 26</ref>


However, the GDR operated unofficial missions in Western countries, such as Britain, where "KfA Ltd", an agency of the {{lang|de|Kammer für Außenhandel}}, or Department of Foreign Trade of the [[Ministry for Foreign Affairs (East Germany)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]], was established in 1959.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rXIHeNC4pEYC&pg=PA76 ''Uneasy Allies : British–German Relations and European Integration Since 1945''], Klaus Larres, Elizabeth Meehan, OUP Oxford, 2000, page 76–77</ref> By the early 1970s, this had begun to function as a ''de facto'' East German embassy in London, including diplomats on its staff.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ig0ozf-xVpMC&pg=PA13 ''Friendly Enemies: Britain and the GDR, 1949–1990''], Stefan Berger, Norman LaPorte, Berghahn Books, 2010, page 13</ref>
However, the GDR operated unofficial missions in Western countries, such as Britain, where "KfA Ltd", an agency of the {{lang|de|Kammer für Außenhandel}}, or Department of Foreign Trade of the [[Ministry for Foreign Affairs (East Germany)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]], was established in 1959.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rXIHeNC4pEYC&pg=PA76 ''Uneasy Allies : British–German Relations and European Integration Since 1945''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115602/https://books.google.com/books?id=rXIHeNC4pEYC&pg=PA76 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Klaus Larres, Elizabeth Meehan, OUP Oxford, 2000, page 76–77</ref> By the early 1970s, this had begun to function as a ''de facto'' East German embassy in London, including diplomats on its staff.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ig0ozf-xVpMC&pg=PA13 ''Friendly Enemies: Britain and the GDR, 1949–1990''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115444/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ig0ozf-xVpMC&pg=PA13 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Stefan Berger, Norman LaPorte, Berghahn Books, 2010, page 13</ref>


After 1973, West Germany no longer asserted an [[exclusive mandate]] over the whole of Germany, but still did not consider East Germany to be a "foreign" country. Instead of being conducted through the [[Foreign Office (Germany)|Foreign Office]], relations were conducted through a separate [[Minister of Intra-German Relations|Federal Ministry for Intra-German Relations]], known until 1969 as the Federal Ministry of All-German Affairs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=kFTjpT-LZGAC&lpg=PA46&ots=Q1I9ihdoF5&dq=Federal%20Minister%20of%20All-German%20Affairs%201969&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q=Federal%20Minister%20of%20All-German%20Affairs%201969&f=false ''German Politics Today''] Geoffrey K. Roberts, Manchester University Press, 2000, page 46</ref>
After 1973, West Germany no longer asserted an [[exclusive mandate]] over the whole of Germany, but still did not consider East Germany to be a "foreign" country. Instead of being conducted through the [[Foreign Office (Germany)|Foreign Office]], relations were conducted through a separate [[Minister of Intra-German Relations|Federal Ministry for Intra-German Relations]], known until 1969 as the Federal Ministry of All-German Affairs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=kFTjpT-LZGAC&dq=Federal+Minister+of+All-German+Affairs+1969&pg=PA46 ''German Politics Today''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124555/https://books.google.com/books?id=kFTjpT-LZGAC&dq=Federal+Minister+of+All-German+Affairs+1969&pg=PA46 |date=30 March 2023 }} Geoffrey K. Roberts, Manchester University Press, 2000, page 46</ref>


In contrast, East Germany did consider West Germany a completely separate country, meaning that while the East German mission in Bonn was accredited to the West German [[German Chancellery|Chancellery]], its West German counterpart in East Berlin was accredited to East Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PFK7RkdQG14C&pg=PA107 ''Germany Divided: From the Wall to Reunification''], A. James McAdams
In contrast, East Germany did consider West Germany a completely separate country, meaning that while the East German mission in Bonn was accredited to the West German [[German Chancellery|Chancellery]], its West German counterpart in East Berlin was accredited to East Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PFK7RkdQG14C&pg=PA107 ''Germany Divided: From the Wall to Reunification''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115454/https://books.google.com/books?id=PFK7RkdQG14C&pg=PA107 |date=11 April 2023 }}, A. James McAdams
Princeton University Press, 1994, page 107</ref>
Princeton University Press, 1994, page 107</ref>


===Rhodesia after UDI===
===Rhodesia after UDI===
Following its [[Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence|Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI)]] in 1965, [[Rhodesia]] maintained overseas missions in [[Lisbon]] and [[Lourenço Marques]] (now [[Maputo]]) until 1975<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Z4tAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=76QMAAAAIBAJ&pg=4898%2C44571 Rhodesians to quit Lisbon], ''[[Glasgow Herald]]'', 1 May 1975, page 4</ref> and an "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" in [[Pretoria]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&dq=rhodesian+cape+town+pretoria+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22 ''Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia''], Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 52</ref> The Rhodesian Information Office in [[Washington DC|Washington]] remained open, but its director, [[Ken Towsey]], and his staff were deprived of their diplomatic status.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ncZaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=jmwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5989%2C2265141 Goldberg Back British Stand In U.N. Session],''[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]'', 13 November 1965</ref> (Following the country's independence as [[Zimbabwe]], Towsey became chargé d'affaires at the new embassy.)<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/06/26/rhodesias-lobbyist-back-for-mugabe/1adf000e-80d9-40f2-9ec1-a2e720ab8278/ Rhodesia's Lobbyist Back for Mugabe], ''[[The Washington Post]]'', 26 June 1980</ref>
Following its [[Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence|Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI)]] in 1965, [[Rhodesia]] maintained overseas missions in [[Lisbon]] and [[Lourenço Marques]] (now [[Maputo]]) until 1975<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Z4tAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=76QMAAAAIBAJ&pg=4898%2C44571 Rhodesians to quit Lisbon] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160727020846/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Z4tAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=76QMAAAAIBAJ&pg=4898%2C44571 |date=27 July 2016 }}, ''[[Glasgow Herald]]'', 1 May 1975, page 4</ref> and an "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" in [[Pretoria]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&q=%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22 ''Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124553/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&q=%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 52</ref> The Rhodesian Information Office in [[Washington DC|Washington]] remained open, but its director, [[Ken Towsey]], and his staff were deprived of their diplomatic status.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ncZaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=jmwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5989%2C2265141 Goldberg Back British Stand In U.N. Session] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308032508/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ncZaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=jmwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5989%2C2265141 |date=8 March 2016 }},''[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]'', 13 November 1965</ref> (Following the country's independence as [[Zimbabwe]], Towsey became chargé d'affaires at the new embassy.)<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/06/26/rhodesias-lobbyist-back-for-mugabe/1adf000e-80d9-40f2-9ec1-a2e720ab8278/ Rhodesia's Lobbyist Back for Mugabe] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160206213207/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/06/26/rhodesias-lobbyist-back-for-mugabe/1adf000e-80d9-40f2-9ec1-a2e720ab8278/ |date=6 February 2016 }}, ''[[The Washington Post]]'', 26 June 1980</ref>
[[File:Flag of Rhodesia (1968–1979).svg|thumb|right|The flag of Rhodesia, adopted in 1968, was denounced as an illegal symbol when raised over Rhodesia House in London in 1969.<ref name="strand" />]]
[[File:Flag of Rhodesia (1968–1979).svg|thumb|right|The flag of Rhodesia, adopted in 1968, was denounced as an illegal symbol when raised over Rhodesia House in London in 1969.<ref name="strand" />]]
The High Commission in London, known as [[Rhodesia House]], continued to function until it was closed in 1969, following the decision by white Rhodesians in a [[Rhodesian constitutional referendum, 1969|referendum]] to make the country a republic, along with the British Residual Mission in [[Harare|Salisbury]].<ref>[http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1969/jun/24/rhodesia Rhodesia], ''[[Hansard]]'', HC Deb 24 June 1969 vol 785 cc1218-27</ref> Prior to its closure, the mission flew the newly adopted [[Flag of Rhodesia]] in a provocative gesture, as the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] Prime Ministers arrived in London for their [[Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference|Conference]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8qDsBKN_XQ&t=17s SMITH SHOWS THE FLAG], [[Associated Press Archive]], 6 January 1969</ref> This was considered illegal by the [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office|Foreign Office]], and prompted calls by [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] MP [[Willie Hamilton]], who condemned it as "the flag of an illegal Government in rebellion against the Crown", for its removal.<ref name="strand">[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eH9AAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zqMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2718%2C414685 M.P. calls for removal of Rhodesian flag in Strand], ''[[The Glasgow Herald]]'', 4 January 1969, page 1</ref>
The High Commission in London, known as [[Rhodesia House]], continued to function until it was closed in 1969, following the decision by white Rhodesians in a [[Rhodesian constitutional referendum, 1969|referendum]] to make the country a republic. The British Residual Mission in [[Harare|Salisbury]] was closed at the same time.<ref>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1969/jun/24/rhodesia Rhodesia] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313012729/http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1969/jun/24/rhodesia |date=13 March 2016 }}, ''[[Hansard]]'', HC Deb 24 June 1969 vol 785 cc1218-27</ref> Prior to its closure, the mission flew the newly adopted [[Flag of Rhodesia]] in a provocative gesture, as the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] Prime Ministers arrived in London for their [[Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference|Conference]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8qDsBKN_XQ&t=17s SMITH SHOWS THE FLAG] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124542/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8qDsBKN_XQ&t=17s |date=30 March 2023 }}, [[Associated Press Archive]], 6 January 1969</ref> This was considered illegal by the [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office|Foreign Office]], and prompted calls by [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] MP [[Willie Hamilton]], who condemned it as "the flag of an illegal Government in rebellion against the Crown", for its removal.<ref name="strand">[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eH9AAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zqMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2718%2C414685 M.P. calls for removal of Rhodesian flag in Strand] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308041235/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eH9AAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zqMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2718%2C414685 |date=8 March 2016 }}, ''[[The Glasgow Herald]]'', 4 January 1969, page 1</ref>


In Australia, the federal government sought to close the [[Rhodesia Information Centre]] in Sydney.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=LsNUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=spADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6314%2C341488 Rhodesia Office Will Be Closed], ''[[The Age]]'', 3 April 1972</ref> In 1973, the [[Australian Labor Party|Labor]] government of [[Gough Whitlam]] cut post and telephone links to the centre, but this was [[Bradley v Commonwealth|ruled illegal]] by the [[High Court of Australia|High Court]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PbriAAAAMAAJ&q=rhodesian+whitlam+high+court&dq=rhodesian+whitlam+high+court&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi51Pq--MfLAhUFGg4KHZIfDuIQ6AEIMTAE ''Africa Contemporary Record: Annual Survey and Documents, Volume 6''], Colin Legum, Africana Publishing Company, 1974</ref> An office was also established in [[Paris]], but was closed down by the [[French government]] in 1977.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xr4gAAAAIBAJ&sjid=02kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3922%2C4107566 US Not Closing Rhodesian Office], ''[[The Lewiston Daily Sun]]'', 27 August 1977, page 8</ref>
In Australia, the federal government sought to close the [[Rhodesia Information Centre]] in Sydney.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=LsNUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=spADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6314%2C341488 Rhodesia Office Will Be Closed] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308034851/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=LsNUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=spADAAAAIBAJ&pg=6314%2C341488 |date=8 March 2016 }}, ''[[The Age]]'', 3 April 1972</ref> In 1973, the [[Australian Labor Party|Labor]] government of [[Gough Whitlam]] cut post and telephone links to the centre, but this was [[Bradley v Commonwealth|ruled illegal]] by the [[High Court of Australia|High Court]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=PbriAAAAMAAJ&q=rhodesian+whitlam+high+court ''Africa Contemporary Record: Annual Survey and Documents, Volume 6''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115651/https://books.google.com/books?id=PbriAAAAMAAJ&q=rhodesian+whitlam+high+court |date=11 April 2023 }}, Colin Legum, Africana Publishing Company, 1974</ref> An office was also established in [[Paris]], but was closed down by the [[French government]] in 1977.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xr4gAAAAIBAJ&sjid=02kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3922%2C4107566 US Not Closing Rhodesian Office] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308084342/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xr4gAAAAIBAJ&sjid=02kFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3922%2C4107566 |date=8 March 2016 }}, ''[[The Lewiston Daily Sun]]'', 27 August 1977, page 8</ref>


Similarly, the United States recalled its consul-general from [[Harare|Salisbury]], and reduced consular staff,<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=apEhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=D5gFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2570%2C6764188 US To Restrict Sales To Rhodesia], ''[[Reading Eagle]]'', 12 December 1965</ref> but did not move to close its consulate until the declaration of a republic in 1970.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=wMPBk25aptwC&lpg=PA55&dq=%22Rhodesian%20Information%20Office%22&pg=PA55#v=onepage&q=%22Rhodesian%20Information%20Office%22&f=true ''The Superpowers and Africa: The Constraints of a Rivalry, 1960–1990''], Zaki Laïdi
Similarly, the United States recalled its consul-general from [[Harare|Salisbury]], and reduced consular staff,<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=apEhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=D5gFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2570%2C6764188 US To Restrict Sales To Rhodesia] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308031551/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=apEhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=D5gFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2570%2C6764188 |date=8 March 2016 }}, ''[[Reading Eagle]]'', 12 December 1965</ref> but did not move to close its consulate until the declaration of a republic in 1970.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=wMPBk25aptwC&dq=%22Rhodesian+Information+Office%22&pg=PA55 ''The Superpowers and Africa: The Constraints of a Rivalry, 1960–1990''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230408031621/https://books.google.com/books?id=wMPBk25aptwC&dq=%22Rhodesian+Information+Office%22&pg=PA55 |date=8 April 2023 }}, Zaki Laïdi
University of Chicago Press, 1990, page 55</ref> South Africa, however, retained its "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" after the UDI,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3ptWAAAAYAAJ&dq=%22Accredited+Diplomatic+Representative%22+rhodesia&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22Accredited+Diplomatic+Representative%22 ''Foreign Affairs for New States: Some Questions of Credentials''], Peter John Boyce,
University of Chicago Press, 1990, page 55</ref> South Africa, however, retained its "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" after the UDI,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3ptWAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Accredited+Diplomatic+Representative%22 ''Foreign Affairs for New States: Some Questions of Credentials''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115445/https://books.google.com/books?id=3ptWAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Accredited+Diplomatic+Representative%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Peter John Boyce,
University of Queensland Press, January 1977, page 13</ref> which allowed it to continue to recognise British sovereignty as well as to deal with the ''de facto'' authority of the government of [[Ian Smith]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=mb7dE6K6gJoC&lpg=PA257&ots=wUmi3J6fFe&dq=salisbury%20rhodesia%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&pg=PA257#v=onepage&q=salisbury%20rhodesia%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&f=true ''Confrontation and Accommodation in Southern Africa: The Limits of Independence''], Kenneth W. Grundy, University of California Press, 1973, page 257</ref>
University of Queensland Press, January 1977, page 13</ref> which allowed it to continue to recognise British sovereignty as well as to deal with the ''de facto'' authority of the government of [[Ian Smith]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=mb7dE6K6gJoC&dq=salisbury+rhodesia+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA257 ''Confrontation and Accommodation in Southern Africa: The Limits of Independence''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405020437/https://books.google.com/books?id=mb7dE6K6gJoC&dq=salisbury+rhodesia+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA257 |date=5 April 2023 }}, Kenneth W. Grundy, University of California Press, 1973, page 257</ref>


The self-styled "South African Diplomatic Mission" in Salisbury became the only such mission remaining in the country after 1975,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3PNt46aB_sYC&lpg=PA141&ots=dmLbiCii6N&dq=%22South%20African%20Diplomatic%20Mission%22%20salisbury&pg=PA141#v=onepage&q=%22South%20African%20Diplomatic%20Mission%22%20salisbury&f=true ''Native Vs. Settler: Ethnic Conflict in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland, and South Africa''], Thomas G. Mitchell
The self-styled "South African Diplomatic Mission" in Salisbury became the only such mission remaining in the country after 1975,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3PNt46aB_sYC&dq=%22South+African+Diplomatic+Mission%22+salisbury&pg=PA141 ''Native Vs. Settler: Ethnic Conflict in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland, and South Africa''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115455/https://books.google.com/books?id=3PNt46aB_sYC&dq=%22South+African+Diplomatic+Mission%22+salisbury&pg=PA141 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Thomas G. Mitchell
Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000, page 141</ref> when [[Portugal]] downgraded its mission to consul level,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&q=portugal+close+consulate+salisbury+rhodesia+1975&dq=portugal+close+consulate+salisbury+rhodesia+1975&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjL5aqjw9DKAhUBtRQKHa4BCa4Q6AEIKTAA ''Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia''], Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 77</ref> having recalled its consul-general from Salisbury in May 1970.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=2nIjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MWYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7488%2C4326539 Portugal Severs Key Link With Rhodesia], ''[[Sarasota Herald-Tribune]]'', 27 April 1970</ref>
Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000, page 141</ref> when [[Portugal]] downgraded its mission to consul level,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&q=portugal+close+consulate+salisbury+rhodesia+1975 ''Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411125506/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZVt0AAAAMAAJ&q=portugal+close+consulate+salisbury+rhodesia+1975 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 77</ref> having recalled its consul-general from Salisbury in May 1970.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=2nIjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MWYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7488%2C4326539 Portugal Severs Key Link With Rhodesia] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160308032138/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=2nIjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MWYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=7488%2C4326539 |date=8 March 2016 }}, ''[[Sarasota Herald-Tribune]]'', 27 April 1970</ref>


===Bophuthatswana===
===Bophuthatswana===
[[Bophuthatswana]], one of four nominally independent [[Bantustan|"homelands"]] created by South Africa under [[apartheid]], was not recognised as an independent state by any other country.<ref>[http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1988/oct/19/bophuthatswana Bophuthatswana, HC Deb], ''[[Hansard]]'', 19 October 1988 vol 138 cc872-3</ref> Consequently, it only had diplomatic relations with Pretoria, which maintained an embassy in [[Mmabatho]], its capital.<ref>[http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-02-11/news/8801090054_1_president-lucas-mangope-four-independent-homelands-bophuthatswana-cabinet South Africa Suppresses Coup In Homeland], ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', 11 February 1988</ref> However, it established representative offices internationally, including in London<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/toytown-image-hid-apartheid-tyranny-as-white-right-wingers-die-at-the-hands-of-bophuthatswana-forces-1428525.html Toytown image hid apartheid tyranny: As white right-wingers die at the hands of Bophuthatswana forces, Richard Dowden examines the racial purpose of the 'homeland'], ''[[The Independent]]'', 12 March 1994</ref> and [[Tel Aviv]].<ref name="lissoni">[https://books.google.com/books?id=PHsOCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA58&ots=nrKJeVaZUe&dq=%22Bophuthatswana%20House%22&pg=PA58#v=onepage&q=%22Bophuthatswana%20House%22&f=true Apartheid's "Little Israel"], Arianna Lissoni, in ''Apartheid Israel: The Politics of an Analogy'', Sean Jacobs, Jon Soske, Haymarket Books, 2015</ref>
[[Bophuthatswana]], one of four nominally independent [[Bantustan|"homelands"]] created by South Africa under [[apartheid]], was not recognised as an independent state by any other country.<ref>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1988/oct/19/bophuthatswana Bophuthatswana, HC Deb] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160206071740/http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1988/oct/19/bophuthatswana |date=6 February 2016 }}, ''[[Hansard]]'', 19 October 1988 vol 138 cc872-3</ref> Consequently, it only had diplomatic relations with Pretoria, which maintained an embassy in [[Mmabatho]], its capital.<ref>[http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-02-11/news/8801090054_1_president-lucas-mangope-four-independent-homelands-bophuthatswana-cabinet South Africa Suppresses Coup In Homeland] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203144454/http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1988-02-11/news/8801090054_1_president-lucas-mangope-four-independent-homelands-bophuthatswana-cabinet |date=3 February 2016 }}, ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', 11 February 1988</ref> However, it established representative offices internationally, including in London<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/toytown-image-hid-apartheid-tyranny-as-white-right-wingers-die-at-the-hands-of-bophuthatswana-forces-1428525.html Toytown image hid apartheid tyranny: As white right-wingers die at the hands of Bophuthatswana forces, Richard Dowden examines the racial purpose of the 'homeland'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203135644/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/toytown-image-hid-apartheid-tyranny-as-white-right-wingers-die-at-the-hands-of-bophuthatswana-forces-1428525.html |date=3 February 2016 }}, ''[[The Independent]]'', 12 March 1994</ref> and [[Tel Aviv]].<ref name="lissoni">[https://books.google.com/books?id=PHsOCwAAQBAJ&dq=%22Bophuthatswana+House%22&pg=PA58 Apartheid's "Little Israel"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124556/https://books.google.com/books?id=PHsOCwAAQBAJ&dq=%22Bophuthatswana+House%22&pg=PA58 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Arianna Lissoni, in ''Apartheid Israel: The Politics of an Analogy'', Sean Jacobs, Jon Soske, Haymarket Books, 2015</ref>
[[File:Flag of Bophuthatswana (1972–1994).svg|thumb|right|"[[Bophuthatswana]] House" in Tel Aviv was the only place outside [[Apartheid South Africa|South Africa]] to fly the [[Homeland (South Africa)|homeland]]'s flag.<ref name="lissoni" />]]
[[File:Flag of Bophuthatswana (1972–1994).svg|thumb|right|"[[Bophuthatswana]] House" in Tel Aviv was the only place outside [[Apartheid South Africa|South Africa]] to fly the [[Homeland (South Africa)|homeland]]'s flag.<ref name="lissoni" />]]
The opening of "Bophuthatswana House" in [[Holland Park]] in London in 1982, attended by the homeland's president, [[Lucas Mangope]], prompted demonstrations by the [[Anti-Apartheid Movement]], and while the [[British government]] gave Mangope a special travel document to enter the United Kingdom, it refused to accord the mission diplomatic status.<ref>[http://www.aamarchives.org/browse-the-archive/history/file/1080-pic8215-%E2%80%98bophuthatswana-house%E2%80%99-protest.html?tmpl=component&start=60 'Bophuthatswana House' protest], Anti-Apartheid Movement Archive</ref>
The opening of "Bophuthatswana House" in [[Holland Park]] in London in 1982, attended by the homeland's president, [[Lucas Mangope]], prompted demonstrations by the [[Anti-Apartheid Movement]], and while the [[British government]] gave Mangope a special travel document to enter the United Kingdom, it refused to accord the mission diplomatic status.<ref>[http://www.aamarchives.org/browse-the-archive/history/file/1080-pic8215-%E2%80%98bophuthatswana-house%E2%80%99-protest.html?tmpl=component&start=60 'Bophuthatswana House' protest] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160204011511/http://www.aamarchives.org/browse-the-archive/history/file/1080-pic8215-%E2%80%98bophuthatswana-house%E2%80%99-protest.html?tmpl=component&start=60 |date=4 February 2016 }}, Anti-Apartheid Movement Archive</ref>


In 1985, a "Bophuthatswana House" was opened in Tel Aviv, in a building on [[HaYarkon Street]] next to the [[Embassy of the United Kingdom, Tel Aviv|British Embassy]].<ref>[https://apnews.com/7d5875f00b219ffabf7fd5aec3836522 Foreign Ministry opposed to Bophuthatswana office in Israel], [[Associated Press]], 5 June 1985</ref> Despite the objections of the Israeli [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Israel)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]], the homeland's flag was flown from the building.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=5CVeyhyEJ_4C&lpg=PA157&vq=Mangope&pg=PA157#v=snippet&q=Mangope&f=false ''The Unspoken Alliance: Israel's Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa''], Sasha Polakow-Suransky, Pantheon Books, New York, 2010, page 157.</ref>
In 1985, a "Bophuthatswana House" was opened in Tel Aviv, in a building on [[HaYarkon Street]] next to the [[Embassy of the United Kingdom, Tel Aviv|British Embassy]].<ref>[https://apnews.com/7d5875f00b219ffabf7fd5aec3836522 Foreign Ministry opposed to Bophuthatswana office in Israel] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180810235515/https://apnews.com/7d5875f00b219ffabf7fd5aec3836522 |date=10 August 2018 }}, [[Associated Press]], 5 June 1985</ref> Despite the objections of the Israeli [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Israel)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs]], the homeland's flag was flown from the building.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=5CVeyhyEJ_4C&q=Mangope&pg=PA157 ''The Unspoken Alliance: Israel's Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124552/https://books.google.com/books?id=5CVeyhyEJ_4C&q=Mangope&pg=PA157 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, Pantheon Books, New York, 2010, page 157.</ref>


Following the end of apartheid and the reincorporation of the homeland into South Africa, the Bophuthatswana government properties were acquired by the new South African government and sold.<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/inside-file-a-des-res-in-trafalgar-square-one-proud-owner-1435342.html Inside File: A des. res. in Trafalgar Square, one proud owner], ''The Independent'', 11 May 1994</ref>
Following the end of apartheid and the reincorporation of the homeland into South Africa, the Bophuthatswana government properties were acquired by the new South African government and sold.<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/inside-file-a-des-res-in-trafalgar-square-one-proud-owner-1435342.html Inside File: A des. res. in Trafalgar Square, one proud owner] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180905221818/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/inside-file-a-des-res-in-trafalgar-square-one-proud-owner-1435342.html |date=5 September 2018 }}, ''The Independent'', 11 May 1994</ref>


===China in Hong Kong and Macau===
===China in Hong Kong and Macau===
When Hong Kong was under [[British Hong Kong|British administration]], China did not establish a consulate in what it considered to be part of its national territory.<ref>[http://www.hkjournal.org/archive/2011_fall/5.htm The Long History of United Front Activity in Hong Kong], ''Hong Kong Journal'', Cindy Yik-yi Chu, July 2011</ref> However, the [[Chinese Communist Party|Communist]] government of the People's Republic of China in Beijing, and its predecessor, the [[Kuomintang]] government of the [[Republic of China (1912–49)|Republic of China]] in [[Nanjing#Capital of the Republic of China|Nanking]] established ''de facto'' representation in the colony.
When Hong Kong was under [[British Hong Kong|British administration]], China did not establish a consulate in what it considered to be part of its national territory.<ref>[http://www.hkjournal.org/archive/2011_fall/5.htm The Long History of United Front Activity in Hong Kong] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129012715/http://hkjournal.org/archive/2011_fall/5.htm |date=29 January 2016 }}, ''Hong Kong Journal'', Cindy Yik-yi Chu, July 2011</ref> However, the [[Chinese Communist Party|Communist]] government of the People's Republic of China in Beijing, and its predecessor, the [[Kuomintang]] government of the [[Republic of China (1912–49)|Republic of China]] in [[Nanjing#Capital of the Republic of China|Nanking]] established ''de facto'' representation in the colony.


While the [[Nationalist government]] had negotiated with the British regarding the appointment of a Consul-General in Hong Kong in 1945, it decided against such an appointment, with its representative in the colony, T W Kwok (Kuo Teh-hua) instead being styled "Special Commissioner for Hong Kong".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=RSSOAAAAMAAJ&dq=kuomintang+hong+kong+consul-general&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=consul-general ''Democracy shelved: Great Britain, China, and attempts at constitutional reform in Hong Kong, 1945–1952''], Steve Yui-Sang Tsang, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1988, page 28</ref> This was in addition to his role as Nanking's Special Commissioner for [[Guangdong|Kwangtung]] and [[Guangxi|<
While the [[Nationalist government]] had negotiated with the British regarding the appointment of a Consul-General in Hong Kong in 1945, it decided against such an appointment, with its representative in the colony, T W Kwok (Kuo Teh-hua) instead being styled "Special Commissioner for Hong Kong".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=RSSOAAAAMAAJ&q=consul-general ''Democracy shelved: Great Britain, China, and attempts at constitutional reform in Hong Kong, 1945–1952''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115504/https://books.google.com/books?id=RSSOAAAAMAAJ&q=consul-general |date=11 April 2023 }}, Steve Yui-Sang Tsang, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1988, page 28</ref> This was in addition to his role as Nanking's Special Commissioner for [[Guangdong|Kwangtung]] and [[Guangxi|Kwangsi]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=IK4dRVtuINIC&dq=%22Special+Commissioner+for+Hong+Kong%22&pg=PA96 ''Hegemonies Compared: State Formation and Chinese School Politics in Postwar Singapore and Hong Kong''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115503/https://books.google.com/books?id=IK4dRVtuINIC&dq=%22Special+Commissioner+for+Hong+Kong%22&pg=PA96 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Ting-Hong Wong, Routledge Press, 2002, page 96</ref> Disagreements also arose with the British authorities, with the [[Governor of Hong Kong|Governor]], [[Alexander Grantham]], opposing an office building for the "Commissioner for Foreign Affairs of the Provinces of Kwangtung and Kuangsi" being erected on the site of the [[Kowloon Walled City|Walled City]] in [[Kowloon]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=GZu0AQAAQBAJ&dq=kuomintang+hong+kong+consul+1945&pg=PA129 ''Britain and China 1945–1950: Documents on British Policy Overseas, Series I, Volume 8''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115517/https://books.google.com/books?id=GZu0AQAAQBAJ&dq=kuomintang+hong+kong+consul+1945&pg=PA129 |date=11 April 2023 }}, S.R. Ashton, G. Bennett, K. Hamilton, Routledge, 2013 page 129</ref> In 1950, following British recognition of the People's Republic of China, the office of the Special Commissioner was closed and Kwok withdrawn.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=LNNhhpkKJ10C&dq=T+W+Kwok+hong+kong&pg=PA106 ''Via Ports: From Hong Kong to Hong Kong''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115504/https://books.google.com/books?id=LNNhhpkKJ10C&dq=T+W+Kwok+hong+kong&pg=PA106 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Alexander Grantham, Hong Kong University Press, 2012, page 106</ref>
Kwangsi]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=IK4dRVtuINIC&lpg=PA96&ots=4-PRazlRrP&dq=%22Special%20Commissioner%20for%20Hong%20Kong%22&pg=PA96#v=onepage&q=%22Special%20Commissioner%20for%20Hong%20Kong%22&f=false ''Hegemonies Compared: State Formation and Chinese School Politics in Postwar Singapore and Hong Kong''], Ting-Hong Wong, Routledge Press, 2002, page 96</ref> Disagreements also arose with the British authorities, with the [[Governor of Hong Kong|Governor]], [[Alexander Grantham]], opposing an office building for the "Commissioner for Foreign Affairs of the Provinces of Kwangtung and Kuangsi" being erected on the site of the [[Kowloon Walled City|Walled City]] in [[Kowloon]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=GZu0AQAAQBAJ&lpg=PA130&dq=kuomintang%20hong%20kong%20consul%201945&pg=PA129#v=onepage&q=kuomintang%20hong%20kong%20consul%201945&f=true ''Britain and China 1945–1950: Documents on British Policy Overseas, Series I, Volume 8''], S.R. Ashton, G. Bennett, K. Hamilton, Routledge, 2013 page 129</ref> In 1950, following British recognition of the People's Republic of China, the office of the Special Commissioner was closed and Kwok withdrawn.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=LNNhhpkKJ10C&lpg=PA106&ots=miSItLsMMK&dq=T%20W%20Kwok%20hong%20kong&pg=PA106#v=onepage&q=T%20W%20Kwok%20hong%20kong&f=true ''Via Ports: From Hong Kong to Hong Kong''], Alexander Grantham, Hong Kong University Press, 2012, page 106</ref>


In 1956, the Chinese [[Premier of the People's Republic of China|Premier]] [[Zhou Enlai]] requested the opening of a representative office in Hong Kong, but this also was opposed by Grantham, who advised the [[Secretary of State for the Colonies]], [[Alan Lennox-Boyd]] in 1957 that it would a) give "an aura of respectability" to pro-Communist elements, b) have "a deplorable effect" on the morale of Chinese in Hong Kong, c) give the impression to friendly countries that Britain was retreating from the colony, d) that there would be no end to the claims of the Chinese representative as to what constituted his functions, and e) become a target for [[Kuomintang]] and other anti-communist activities.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=qjIOBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA275&ots=DTT-Xyo_8b&dq=%22Special%20Commissioner%20for%20Hong%20Kong%22&pg=PA275#v=onepage&q=%22Special%20Commissioner%20for%20Hong%20Kong%22&f=false ''Government and Politics''], Steve Tsang, Hong Kong University Press, 1995, pages 276</ref>
In 1956, the Chinese [[Premier of the People's Republic of China|Premier]] [[Zhou Enlai]] requested the opening of a representative office in Hong Kong, but this also was opposed by Grantham, who advised the [[Secretary of State for the Colonies]], [[Alan Lennox-Boyd]] in 1957 that it would a) give "an aura of respectability" to pro-Communist elements, b) have "a deplorable effect" on the morale of Chinese in Hong Kong, c) give the impression to friendly countries that Britain was retreating from the colony, d) that there would be no end to the claims of the Chinese representative as to what constituted his functions, and e) become a target for [[Kuomintang]] and other anti-communist activities.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=qjIOBAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Special+Commissioner+for+Hong+Kong%22&pg=PA275 ''Government and Politics''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115502/https://books.google.com/books?id=qjIOBAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Special+Commissioner+for+Hong+Kong%22&pg=PA275 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Steve Tsang, Hong Kong University Press, 1995, pages 276</ref>


Consequently, the People's Republic of China was only represented unofficially in Hong Kong by the [[Xinhua News Agency#Hong Kong|Xinhua News Agency Hong Kong Branch]], which had been operating in the colony since 1945.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=b9gGzWigqpMC&lpg=PA46&ots=F5VoOg-Ep7&dq=xinhua%20news%20agency%20hong%20kong%20branch%20de%20facto&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q=xinhua%20news%20agency%20hong%20kong%20branch%20de%20facto&f=true ''Hong Kong: China's Challenge''], Michael B. Yahuda
Consequently, the People's Republic of China was only represented unofficially in Hong Kong by the [[Xinhua News Agency#Hong Kong|Xinhua News Agency Hong Kong Branch]], which had been operating in the colony since 1945.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=b9gGzWigqpMC&dq=xinhua+news+agency+hong+kong+branch+de+facto&pg=PA46 ''Hong Kong: China's Challenge''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115456/https://books.google.com/books?id=b9gGzWigqpMC&dq=xinhua+news+agency+hong+kong+branch+de+facto&pg=PA46 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Michael B. Yahuda
Psychology Press, 1996, pages 46–47</ref>
Psychology Press, 1996, pages 46–47</ref>
In addition to being a ''bona fide'' news agency, Xinhua also served as cover for the "underground" local branch of the [[Chinese Communist Party]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=WIbVCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA360&dq=xinhua%20de%20facto%20hong%20kong&pg=PA360#v=onepage&q=xinhua%20de%20facto%20hong%20kong&f=true ''China's Political Economy''], Wang Gungwu, John Wong World Scientific, 1998, page 360</ref> known as the Hong Kong and Macau Work Committee (HKMWC).<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=upDNEYtw4uYC&lpg=PA228&ots=9X2ej3deU9&dq=de%20facto%20embassy%20of%20the%20prc%20hong%20kong&pg=PA228#v=onepage&q=de%20facto%20embassy%20of%20the%20prc%20hong%20kong&f=true ''Elections and Democracy in Greater China''], Larry Diamond, Ramon H. Myers, OUP Oxford, 2001, page 228</ref> It also opened additional district branches on [[Hong Kong Island]], [[Kowloon]] and the [[New Territories]] in 1985 to expand its influence.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=UncTYB3LhjAC&lpg=PA155&ots=ZRdrjlILdO&dq=further%20district%20branches%20on%20Hong%20Kong%20Island%2C%20Kowloon%20and%20the%20New%20Territories%20in%201985&pg=PA155#v=onepage&q=further%20district%20branches%20on%20Hong%20Kong%20Island,%20Kowloon%20and%20the%20New%20Territories%20in%201985&f=true ''Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral Democracy''], Brian Bridges, Lok-sang Ho, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, page 155</ref>
In addition to being a ''bona fide'' news agency, Xinhua also served as cover for the "underground" local branch of the [[Chinese Communist Party]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=WIbVCgAAQBAJ&dq=xinhua+de+facto+hong+kong&pg=PA360 ''China's Political Economy''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115518/https://books.google.com/books?id=WIbVCgAAQBAJ&dq=xinhua+de+facto+hong+kong&pg=PA360 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Wang Gungwu, John Wong World Scientific, 1998, page 360</ref> known as the Hong Kong and Macau Work Committee (HKMWC).<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=upDNEYtw4uYC&dq=de+facto+embassy+of+the+prc+hong+kong&pg=PA228 ''Elections and Democracy in Greater China''], Larry Diamond, Ramon H. Myers, OUP Oxford, 2001, page 228</ref> It also opened additional district branches on [[Hong Kong Island]], [[Kowloon]] and the [[New Territories]] in 1985 to expand its influence.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=UncTYB3LhjAC&dq=further+district+branches+on+Hong+Kong+Island%2C+Kowloon+and+the+New+Territories+in+1985&pg=PA155 ''Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral Democracy''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115546/https://books.google.com/books?id=UncTYB3LhjAC&dq=further+district+branches+on+Hong+Kong+Island%2C+Kowloon+and+the+New+Territories+in+1985&pg=PA155 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Brian Bridges, Lok-sang Ho, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, page 155</ref>


Despite its unofficial status, the directors of the Xinhua Hong Kong Branch included high-ranking former diplomats such as [[Zhou Nan]], former Ambassador to the United Nations and Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs, who later negotiated the [[Sino-British Joint Declaration]] on the future of Hong Kong.<ref>[http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1533506/poet-diplomat-zhou-nan-takes-aim-occupy-central 'Poet diplomat' Zhou Nan takes aim at Occupy Central], ''[[South China Morning Post]]'', 16 June 2014</ref> His predecessor, [[Xu Jiatun]], was also vice-chairman of the [[Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee]], before fleeing to the United States in response to the military crackdown on the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|Tiananmen Square protests]], where he went into exile.<ref>[http://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/02/22/Chinas-ex-proxy-in-Hong-Kong-fired-for-betrayal/7866667198800/ China's ex-proxy in Hong Kong fired for 'betrayal'], ''[[UPI]]'', 22 February 1991</ref>
Despite its unofficial status, the directors of the Xinhua Hong Kong Branch included high-ranking former diplomats such as [[Zhou Nan]], former Ambassador to the United Nations and Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs, who later negotiated the [[Sino-British Joint Declaration]] on the future of Hong Kong.<ref>[http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1533506/poet-diplomat-zhou-nan-takes-aim-occupy-central 'Poet diplomat' Zhou Nan takes aim at Occupy Central] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151022163834/http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1533506/poet-diplomat-zhou-nan-takes-aim-occupy-central |date=22 October 2015 }}, ''[[South China Morning Post]]'', 16 June 2014</ref> His predecessor, [[Xu Jiatun]], was also vice-chairman of the [[Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee]], before fleeing to the United States in response to the military crackdown on the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989|Tiananmen Square protests]], where he went into exile.<ref>[http://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/02/22/Chinas-ex-proxy-in-Hong-Kong-fired-for-betrayal/7866667198800/ China's ex-proxy in Hong Kong fired for 'betrayal'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510090726/http://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/02/22/Chinas-ex-proxy-in-Hong-Kong-fired-for-betrayal/7866667198800/ |date=10 May 2017 }}, ''[[UPI]]'', 22 February 1991</ref>


On 18 January 2000, after the [[transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong]], the branch office of Xinhua became the [[Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region]].<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/20/world/in-watching-hong-kong-china-loses-the-shades.html In Watching Hong Kong, China Loses The Shades], ''[[The New York Times]]'', 20 February 2000</ref>
On 18 January 2000, after the [[transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong]], the branch office of Xinhua became the [[Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region]].<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/20/world/in-watching-hong-kong-china-loses-the-shades.html In Watching Hong Kong, China Loses The Shades] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160724160817/http://www.nytimes.com/2000/02/20/world/in-watching-hong-kong-china-loses-the-shades.html |date=24 July 2016 }}, ''[[The New York Times]]'', 20 February 2000</ref>


When [[Macau]] was under [[Portuguese Macau|Portuguese administration]], the People's Republic of China was unofficially represented by the Nanguang trading company.<ref name=pt>[http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/3540/1/ulsd_pm_isbn9729679169_MFernandes.pdf Portuguese behavior towards the political transition and the regional integration of Macau in the Pearl River Region], Moisés Silva Fernandes, in ''Macau and Its Neighbours in Transition'', Rufino Ramos, José Rocha Dinis, D.Y.Yuan, Rex Wilson, University of Macau, Macau Foundation, 1997, page 48</ref> This later became known as China Central Enterprise Nam Kwong (Group).<ref>[http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/html/cd/1988/198809/19880922/19880922022_1.html NAM KWONG (GROUP) COMPANY LIMITED], ''[[China Daily]]'', 22 September 1988</ref> Established in 1949, officially to promote trade ties between Macau and mainland China, it operated as the unofficial representative and "shadow government" of the People's Republic in relation to the Portuguese administration.<ref name="fernandes">[https://books.google.com/books?id=OiaaBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA155&dq=Nam%20Kwong%20macau&pg=PA155#v=onepage&q=Nam%20Kwong%20macau&f=true Macao in Sino-Portuguese Relations], Moisés Silva Fernandes, in ''Portuguese Studies Review'', Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, page 155</ref>
When [[Macau]] was under [[Portuguese Macau|Portuguese administration]], the People's Republic of China was unofficially represented by the Nanguang trading company.<ref name=pt>[http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/3540/1/ulsd_pm_isbn9729679169_MFernandes.pdf Portuguese behavior towards the political transition and the regional integration of Macau in the Pearl River Region] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304105905/http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/3540/1/ulsd_pm_isbn9729679169_MFernandes.pdf |date=4 March 2016 }}, Moisés Silva Fernandes, in ''Macau and Its Neighbours in Transition'', Rufino Ramos, José Rocha Dinis, D.Y.Yuan, Rex Wilson, University of Macau, Macau Foundation, 1997, page 48</ref> This later became known as China Central Enterprise Nam Kwong (Group).<ref>[http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/html/cd/1988/198809/19880922/19880922022_1.html NAM KWONG (GROUP) COMPANY LIMITED] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160204015141/http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/html/cd/1988/198809/19880922/19880922022_1.html |date=4 February 2016 }}, ''[[China Daily]]'', 22 September 1988</ref> Established in 1949, officially to promote trade ties between Macau and mainland China, it operated as the unofficial representative and "shadow government" of the People's Republic in relation to the Portuguese administration.<ref name="fernandes">[https://books.google.com/books?id=OiaaBAAAQBAJ&dq=Nam+Kwong+macau&pg=PA155 Macao in Sino-Portuguese Relations] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411125441/https://books.google.com/books?id=OiaaBAAAQBAJ&dq=Nam+Kwong+macau&pg=PA155 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Moisés Silva Fernandes, in ''Portuguese Studies Review'', Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, page 155</ref>


It also served to challenge the rival "Special Commissariat of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China" in the territory, which represented the [[Kuomintang]] government on [[Taiwan]].<ref name="fernandes"/> This was closed after the pro-[[Chinese Communist Party|Communist]] [[12-3 incident]] in 1966, after which the Portuguese authorities agreed to ban all Kuomintang activities in Macau.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_Ug0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=6GYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4785%2C822777 Macao Locals Favor Portuguese Rule], Sam Cohen, ''[[The Observer]]'' in ''[[Sarasota Herald-Tribune]]'', 2 June 1974, page 4H</ref> Following the [[Carnation Revolution]], [[Portugal]] redefined Macau as a "Chinese territory under Portuguese administration" in 1976.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=EalnZaeiVmAC Lisbon Seen in 1999 Macao Shift], ''The New York Times'', 8 January 1987</ref> However, [[Lisbon]] did not establish diplomatic relations with Beijing until 1979.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041211021308/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-08/24/content_1872701.htm Sino-Portugal relations], ''[[Xinhua]]'' 24 August 2004</ref>
It also served to challenge the rival "Special Commissariat of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China" in the territory, which represented the [[Kuomintang]] government on [[Taiwan]].<ref name="fernandes"/> This was closed after the pro-[[Chinese Communist Party|Communist]] [[12-3 incident]] in 1966, after which the Portuguese authorities agreed to ban all Kuomintang activities in Macau.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_Ug0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=6GYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4785%2C822777 Macao Locals Favor Portuguese Rule] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170401212830/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_Ug0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=6GYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4785%2C822777 |date=1 April 2017 }}, Sam Cohen, ''[[The Observer]]'' in ''[[Sarasota Herald-Tribune]]'', 2 June 1974, page 4H</ref> Following the [[Carnation Revolution]], [[Portugal]] redefined Macau as a "Chinese territory under Portuguese administration" in 1976.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=EalnZaeiVmAC Lisbon Seen in 1999 Macao Shift], ''The New York Times'', 8 January 1987</ref> However, [[Lisbon]] did not establish diplomatic relations with Beijing until 1979.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041211021308/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-08/24/content_1872701.htm Sino-Portugal relations], ''[[Xinhua]]'' 24 August 2004</ref>


In 1984, Nam Kwong was split into political and trading arms.<ref name="Maxwell">[https://books.google.com/books?id=99mDi7KYa1oC&lpg=PA280&dq=%22nam%20kwong%22%20macau%20xinhua&pg=PA280#v=onepage&q=%22nam%20kwong%22%20macau%20xinhua&f=true ''Naked Tropics: Essays on Empire and Other Rogues''], Kenneth Maxwell, Psychology Press, 2003, page 280</ref> On 21 September 1987, a Macau branch of Xinhua News Agency was established which, as in Hong Kong, became Beijing's unofficial representative, replacing Nam Kwong.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=1JsUAQAAMAAJ&dq=%22nam+kwong%22+macau+xinhua&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22nam+kwong%22++ ''Asia Yearbook''], ''[[Far Eastern Economic Review]]'', 1988</ref> On 18 January 2000, a month after the [[transfer of sovereignty over Macau]], the Macau branch became the [[Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Macau Special Administrative Region]].<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/insight/archives/2000/01/21/0000020843 Renamed Xinhua becomes a new force in Hong Kong's politics], ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 21 January 2000</ref>
In 1984, Nam Kwong was split into political and trading arms.<ref name="Maxwell">[https://books.google.com/books?id=99mDi7KYa1oC&dq=%22nam+kwong%22+macau+xinhua&pg=PA280 ''Naked Tropics: Essays on Empire and Other Rogues''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115504/https://books.google.com/books?id=99mDi7KYa1oC&dq=%22nam+kwong%22+macau+xinhua&pg=PA280 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Kenneth Maxwell, Psychology Press, 2003, page 280</ref> On 21 September 1987, a Macau branch of Xinhua News Agency was established which, as in Hong Kong, became Beijing's unofficial representative, replacing Nam Kwong.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=1JsUAQAAMAAJ&q=%22nam+kwong%22++ ''Asia Yearbook''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407065939/https://books.google.com/books?id=1JsUAQAAMAAJ&q=%22nam+kwong%22++ |date=7 April 2023 }}, ''[[Far Eastern Economic Review]]'', 1988</ref> On 18 January 2000, a month after the [[transfer of sovereignty over Macau]], the Macau branch became the [[Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Macau Special Administrative Region]].<ref>[http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/insight/archives/2000/01/21/0000020843 Renamed Xinhua becomes a new force in Hong Kong's politics] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170819145347/http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/insight/archives/2000/01/21/0000020843 |date=19 August 2017 }}, ''[[Taipei Times]]'', 21 January 2000</ref>


==Regions==
==Regions==
Line 181: Line 180:


===Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland===
===Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland===
The three [[Devolution in the United Kingdom|devolved]] administrations in the [[United Kingdom]] each maintain their own network of representative offices for trade and cultural purposes. The [[Scottish Government]] maintains eight representative offices around the world, managed by the External Affairs Directorate.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.gov.scot/policies/international-relations/ | title=International relations }}</ref> The [[Welsh Government]] maintains 21 representative offices in twelve countries.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://gov.wales/international-offices | title=International offices }}</ref> The [[Northern Ireland Executive]] maintains representative offices in Brussels, Beijing and Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.executiveoffice-ni.gov.uk/articles/promoting-northern-ireland | title=Promoting Northern Ireland | date=29 May 2015 }}</ref>
The three [[Devolution in the United Kingdom|devolved]] administrations in the [[United Kingdom]] each maintain their own network of representative offices for trade and cultural purposes. The [[Scottish Government]] maintains eight representative offices around the world, managed by the External Affairs Directorate.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.gov.scot/policies/international-relations/ | title=International relations | access-date=13 May 2022 | archive-date=11 April 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115447/https://www.gov.scot/policies/international-relations/ | url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Welsh Government]] maintains 21 representative offices in twelve countries.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://gov.wales/international-offices | title=International offices | date=6 November 2018 | access-date=13 May 2022 | archive-date=19 May 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220519222652/https://gov.wales/international-offices | url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Northern Ireland Executive]] maintains representative offices in Brussels, Beijing and Washington, D.C.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.executiveoffice-ni.gov.uk/articles/promoting-northern-ireland | title=Promoting Northern Ireland | date=29 May 2015 | access-date=13 May 2022 | archive-date=30 June 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630105806/https://www.executiveoffice-ni.gov.uk/articles/promoting-northern-ireland | url-status=live }}</ref>


===Catalonia===
===Catalonia===
[[File:Delegacion Cataluña Cono Sur.jpg|thumb|The Delegation of the Government of Catalonia in Buenos Aires, Argentina]]
Due to the [[Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia of 2006|further devolution of powers]] to the autonomous community of [[Catalonia]] in 2006, it was recognized the right of the Government of Catalonia to establish delegations abroad in order to carry out its own non-diplomatic "foreign action" while foreign affairs remained an exclusive matter of Spanish Government. Currently, the Catalonia's Ministry for Foreign Action and Europe maintains 17 delegations of the Government of Catalonia abroad, including the one before the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://exteriors.gencat.cat/ca/ambits-dactuacio/afers_exteriors/delegacions_govern/ |title=Delegations of the Generalitat abroad |publisher=exteriors.gencat.cat|access-date=17 December 2022 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
Due to the [[Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia of 2006|further devolution of powers]] to the autonomous community of [[Catalonia]] in 2006, the right of the Government of Catalonia to establish delegations abroad in order to carry out its own non-diplomatic "foreign action" was recognized, while foreign affairs remained an exclusive matter of the Spanish Government. Currently, Catalonia's Ministry for Foreign Action and Europe maintains 17 [[Delegation of the Government abroad (Catalonia)|delegations of the Government of Catalonia abroad]], including one before the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://exteriors.gencat.cat/ca/ambits-dactuacio/afers_exteriors/delegacions_govern/ |title=Delegations of the Generalitat abroad |publisher=exteriors.gencat.cat |access-date=17 December 2022 |df=dmy-all |archive-date=30 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221130111522/https://exteriors.gencat.cat/ca/ambits-dactuacio/afers_exteriors/delegacions_govern/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


===Montenegro (before 2006)===
===Montenegro (before 2006)===
Prior to achieving full independence in 2006, [[Montenegro]] effectively ran its own foreign policy independently of the [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]] and the [[Union of Serbia and Montenegro]], with a [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] in [[Podgorica]] and trade missions abroad operating as ''de facto'' embassies.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gk2QAgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA60&dq=trade%20missions%20de%20facto%20embassies%20montenegro&pg=PA60#v=onepage&q=trade%20missions%20de%20facto%20embassies%20montenegro&f=true Montenegro and Serbia: disassociation, negotiation, resolution?], Philip Lyon in ''De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty'' Tozun Bahcheli, Barry Bartmann, Henry Srebrnik, Routledge, 2004, page 60</ref>
Prior to achieving full independence in 2006, [[Montenegro]] effectively ran its own foreign policy independently of the [[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia]] and the [[Union of Serbia and Montenegro]], with a [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] in [[Podgorica]] and trade missions abroad operating as ''de facto'' embassies.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Gk2QAgAAQBAJ&dq=trade+missions+de+facto+embassies+montenegro&pg=PA60 Montenegro and Serbia: disassociation, negotiation, resolution?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124542/https://books.google.com/books?id=Gk2QAgAAQBAJ&dq=trade+missions+de+facto+embassies+montenegro&pg=PA60 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Philip Lyon in ''De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty'' Tozun Bahcheli, Barry Bartmann, Henry Srebrnik, Routledge, 2004, page 60</ref>


==Dependent territories==
==Dependent territories==


===Commonwealth of Nations===
===Commonwealth of Nations===
Historically, in [[Crown colony|British colonies]], independent Commonwealth countries were represented by Commissions, which functioned independently of their [[High Commissioner (Commonwealth)|High Commissions]] in London. For example, Canada,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=IBwdAAAAIAAJ&q=%22canadian+commissioner+in+singapore%22&dq=%22canadian+commissioner+in+singapore%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRobbJoMzKAhVC1xoKHfaCDUQQ6AEIIDAA ''Colonial Reports Report on Sarawak''], Great Britain, Colonial Office
Historically, in [[Crown colony|British colonies]], independent Commonwealth countries were represented by Commissions, which functioned independently of their [[High Commissioner (Commonwealth)|High Commissions]] in London. For example, Canada,<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=IBwdAAAAIAAJ&q=%22canadian+commissioner+in+singapore%22 ''Colonial Reports Report on Sarawak''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115503/https://books.google.com/books?id=IBwdAAAAIAAJ&q=%22canadian+commissioner+in+singapore%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Great Britain, Colonial Office
1961, page 7</ref> Australia<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=G-P_-jowPoUC&lpg=PA28&dq=%22australian%20commissioner%20in%20singapore%22&pg=PA28#v=onepage&q=%22australian%20commissioner%20in%20singapore%22&f=false ''Losing the Blanket: Australia and the End of Britain's Empire''], David Goldsworthy
1961, page 7</ref> Australia<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=G-P_-jowPoUC&dq=%22australian+commissioner+in+singapore%22&pg=PA28 ''Losing the Blanket: Australia and the End of Britain's Empire''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115505/https://books.google.com/books?id=G-P_-jowPoUC&dq=%22australian+commissioner+in+singapore%22&pg=PA28 |date=11 April 2023 }}, David Goldsworthy
Melbourne University Publish, 2002, page 28</ref> and [[New Zealand]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=vFAgAAAAMAAJ&q=%22new+zealand+commission%22+singapore&dq=%22new+zealand+commission%22+singapore&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi904avnMzKAhVFOxQKHc-jCbcQ6AEILjAA ''External Affairs Review, Volume 6''], New Zealand. Dept. of External Affairs 1956, page 41</ref> maintained Commissions in Singapore, while following its independence in 1947, [[India]] established Commissions in [[Kenya]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ghAPAQAAIAAJ&dq=nairobi+%22indian+commission%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22indian+commission%22 ''Indian Coffee: Bulletin of the Indian Coffee Board, Volume 21''], Coffee Board, 1957, page 202</ref> [[Trinidad and Tobago]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=XFYvAAAAIAAJ&q=trinidad+%22indian+commission%22&dq=trinidad+%22indian+commission%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwin4fjRmczKAhWMWxQKHQNyBZ4Q6AEIPTAD ''Caribbean Studies, Volume 16''], Institute of Caribbean Studies, University of Puerto Rico, 1977, page 22</ref> and [[Mauritius]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=hgwIAQAAIAAJ&q=port+louis+%22indian+commission%22&dq=port+louis+%22indian+commission%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjC9djxl8zKAhXHUhQKHcZNDrMQ6AEIKTAC ''The Establishment and Cultivation of Modern Standard Hindi in Mauritius''], Lutchmee Parsad Ramyead, Mahatma Gandhi Institute, 1985, page 86</ref> which became High Commissions on independence. Canada formerly had a Commissioner to [[Bermuda]], although this post was held by the Consul-General to New York City,<ref>[http://w03.international.gc.ca/cra-rce/mission.aspx?lang=eng&MID=438 The Canadian Commission to Bermuda] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227192233/http://w03.international.gc.ca/cra-rce/mission.aspx?lang=eng&MID=438 |date=27 February 2014 }}</ref><ref>[http://bernews.com/2011/11/canadas-one-time-bermuda-diplomat-dies/ Canada's One-Time Bermuda Diplomat Dies]</ref> but there is now an Honorary Canadian Consulate on the island.<ref>[https://travel.gc.ca/assistance/embassies-consulates/bermuda Embassies and consulates - Bermuda]</ref> Commissions of Commonwealth countries in the dependent territory of Hong Kong, such as those of Australia, Canada and Singapore, became consulates-general in name in 1997 but continues to report directly to the respective foreign ministries.
Melbourne University Publish, 2002, page 28</ref> and [[New Zealand]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=vFAgAAAAMAAJ&q=%22new+zealand+commission%22+singapore ''External Affairs Review, Volume 6''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115503/https://books.google.com/books?id=vFAgAAAAMAAJ&q=%22new+zealand+commission%22+singapore |date=11 April 2023 }}, New Zealand. Dept. of External Affairs 1956, page 41</ref> maintained Commissions in Singapore, while following its independence in 1947, [[India]] established Commissions in [[Kenya]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ghAPAQAAIAAJ&q=%22indian+commission%22 ''Indian Coffee: Bulletin of the Indian Coffee Board, Volume 21''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115459/https://books.google.com/books?id=ghAPAQAAIAAJ&q=%22indian+commission%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Coffee Board, 1957, page 202</ref> [[Trinidad and Tobago]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=XFYvAAAAIAAJ&q=trinidad+%22indian+commission%22 ''Caribbean Studies, Volume 16''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115506/https://books.google.com/books?id=XFYvAAAAIAAJ&q=trinidad+%22indian+commission%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Institute of Caribbean Studies, University of Puerto Rico, 1977, page 22</ref> and [[Mauritius]]<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=hgwIAQAAIAAJ&q=port+louis+%22indian+commission%22 ''The Establishment and Cultivation of Modern Standard Hindi in Mauritius''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115548/https://books.google.com/books?id=hgwIAQAAIAAJ&q=port+louis+%22indian+commission%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Lutchmee Parsad Ramyead, Mahatma Gandhi Institute, 1985, page 86</ref> which became High Commissions on independence. Canada formerly had a Commissioner to [[Bermuda]], although this post was held by the Consul-General to New York City,<ref>[http://w03.international.gc.ca/cra-rce/mission.aspx?lang=eng&MID=438 The Canadian Commission to Bermuda] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227192233/http://w03.international.gc.ca/cra-rce/mission.aspx?lang=eng&MID=438 |date=27 February 2014 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://bernews.com/2011/11/canadas-one-time-bermuda-diplomat-dies/ |title=Canada's One-Time Bermuda Diplomat Dies |date=23 November 2011 |access-date=28 January 2016 |archive-date=27 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111127001753/http://bernews.com/2011/11/canadas-one-time-bermuda-diplomat-dies/ |url-status=live }}</ref> but there is now an Honorary Canadian Consulate on the island.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://travel.gc.ca/assistance/embassies-consulates/bermuda |title=Embassies and consulates - Bermuda |date=16 November 2012 |access-date=15 July 2017 |archive-date=13 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170613090640/https://travel.gc.ca/assistance/embassies-consulates/bermuda |url-status=live }}</ref> Commissions of Commonwealth countries in the dependent territory of Hong Kong, such as those of Australia, Canada and Singapore, became consulates-general in name in 1997 but continues to report directly to the respective foreign ministries.


===Southern Rhodesia===
===Southern Rhodesia===
[[File:Zimbabwean embassy in London.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Embassy of Zimbabwe, London|Rhodesia House]] was the office of the colony's [[High Commissioner]] in London. ''(2006 photograph)'']]
[[File:Zimbabwean embassy in London.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Embassy of Zimbabwe, London|Rhodesia House]] was the office of the colony's [[High Commissioner]] in London. ''(2006 photograph)'']]
[[Southern Rhodesia]], uniquely among British colonies, was represented in London by a [[Embassy of Zimbabwe, London|High Commission]] from 1923, while the British government was represented by a High Commission in [[Harare|Salisbury]] from 1951.<ref name="lloyd">[https://books.google.com/books?id=QeqwCQAAQBAJ&lpg=PA240&ots=8_udxk8wmW&dq=salisbury%20rhodesia%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&pg=PA240#v=onepage&q=salisbury%20rhodesia%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&f=true ''Diplomacy with a Difference: the Commonwealth Office of High Commissioner, 1880–2006''], Lorna Lloyd, BRILL, 2007, page 240</ref> Following the [[Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence|Unilateral Declaration of Independence]] in 1965, when the British High Commissioner was withdrawn<ref>[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1501406/Sir-John-Johnston.html Sir John Johnston], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', 25 October 2005</ref> and the Rhodesian High Commissioner requested to leave London, both High Commissions were downgraded to residual missions before being closed down in 1970.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=eYGPAAAAMAAJ&dq=Andrew+Skeen+rhodesia&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=closed+down ''The United Nations, international law, and the Rhodesian independence crisis''], Jericho Nkala, Clarendon Press, 1985, page 76</ref>
[[Southern Rhodesia]], uniquely among British colonies, was represented in London by a [[Embassy of Zimbabwe, London|High Commission]] from 1923, while the British government was represented by a High Commission in [[Harare|Salisbury]] from 1951.<ref name="lloyd">[https://books.google.com/books?id=QeqwCQAAQBAJ&dq=salisbury+rhodesia+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA240 ''Diplomacy with a Difference: the Commonwealth Office of High Commissioner, 1880–2006''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115505/https://books.google.com/books?id=QeqwCQAAQBAJ&dq=salisbury+rhodesia+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA240 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Lorna Lloyd, BRILL, 2007, page 240</ref> Following the [[Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence|Unilateral Declaration of Independence]] in 1965, when the British High Commissioner was withdrawn<ref>[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1501406/Sir-John-Johnston.html Sir John Johnston] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627104715/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1501406/Sir-John-Johnston.html |date=27 June 2018 }}, ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', 25 October 2005</ref> and the Rhodesian High Commissioner requested to leave London, both High Commissions were downgraded to residual missions before being closed down in 1970.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=eYGPAAAAMAAJ&q=closed+down ''The United Nations, international law, and the Rhodesian independence crisis''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115646/https://books.google.com/books?id=eYGPAAAAMAAJ&q=closed+down |date=11 April 2023 }}, Jericho Nkala, Clarendon Press, 1985, page 76</ref>


The self-governing colony also established a High Commission in Pretoria, following the decision of the then [[Union of South Africa]] to establish one in Salisbury, which, after South Africa's withdrawal from the Commonwealth in 1961, was renamed the "South African Diplomatic Mission" with the High Commissioner becoming the "Accredited Diplomatic Representative".<ref name="lloyd"/> Southern Rhodesia, which briefly became part of the [[Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland]], was also able to establish its own consulate in Lourenço Marques (now [[Maputo]]) in [[Mozambique]].<ref>[https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/41731/supplement/3745/data.pdf John Arthur KINSEY, Esq., Consul-General for the Federation at Lourenco Marques], [[London Gazette]], 5 June 1959</ref> In addition, it also had a "Minister for Rhodesian Affairs" in Washington, DC operating under the aegis of the [[British Embassy in Washington|British Embassy]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=dVmhhVHvTAMC&lpg=PA62&dq=%22minister%20for%20rhodesian%20affairs%22&pg=PA62#v=onepage&q=%22minister%20for%20rhodesian%20affairs%22&f=true ''Isolated States: A Comparative Analysis''], Deon Geldenhuys, Cambridge University Press, 1990, page 62</ref> as well representatives in Tokyo and [[Bonn]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rTDvVo52tEAC&pg=PA61&lpg=PA61&dq=accredited+diplomatic+representative+rhodesia&source=bl&ots=RBPpACrVT5&sig=j8jHt4wTunqrHJ3O0UzOTCdowq0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TUmeU5WzN-WO7AaO8YDoBw&ved=0CEsQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%20rhodesia&f=false ''Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law: United Nations Action in the Question of Southern Rhodesia''], Vera Gowlland-Debbas, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 1990</ref>
The self-governing colony also established a High Commission in Pretoria, following the decision of the then [[Union of South Africa]] to establish one in Salisbury, which, after South Africa's withdrawal from the Commonwealth in 1961, was renamed the "South African Diplomatic Mission" with the High Commissioner becoming the "Accredited Diplomatic Representative".<ref name="lloyd"/> Southern Rhodesia, which briefly became part of the [[Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland]], was also able to establish its own consulate in Lourenço Marques (now [[Maputo]]) in [[Mozambique]].<ref>[https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/41731/supplement/3745/data.pdf John Arthur KINSEY, Esq., Consul-General for the Federation at Lourenco Marques] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315030058/https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/41731/supplement/3745/data.pdf |date=15 March 2016 }}, [[London Gazette]], 5 June 1959</ref> In addition, it also had a "Minister for Rhodesian Affairs" in Washington, DC operating under the aegis of the [[British Embassy in Washington|British Embassy]],<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=dVmhhVHvTAMC&dq=%22minister+for+rhodesian+affairs%22&pg=PA62 ''Isolated States: A Comparative Analysis''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115458/https://books.google.com/books?id=dVmhhVHvTAMC&dq=%22minister+for+rhodesian+affairs%22&pg=PA62 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Deon Geldenhuys, Cambridge University Press, 1990, page 62</ref> as well representatives in Tokyo and [[Bonn]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=rTDvVo52tEAC&dq=accredited+diplomatic+representative+rhodesia&pg=PA61 ''Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law: United Nations Action in the Question of Southern Rhodesia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115512/https://books.google.com/books?id=rTDvVo52tEAC&dq=accredited+diplomatic+representative+rhodesia&pg=PA61 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Vera Gowlland-Debbas, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 1990</ref>


During 1965, the government of [[Rhodesia]], as the colony now called itself, made moves to establish a [[Rhodesian mission in Lisbon|mission in Lisbon]] separate from the British Embassy, with its own accredited representative, prompting protests from the British government, which insisted that the representative, Harry Reedman, should be a nominal member of the British Ambassador's staff.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=fWxAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iKMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2768,3715462&hl=en Rhodesia's Man in Lisbon: Objective Said To Be Achieved], ''The Glasgow Herald'', 22 September 1965. page 9</ref> For their part, the Portuguese authorities sought a compromise whereby they would accept Reedman as an independent representative but deny him diplomatic status.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ccm1AQAAQBAJ&lpg=PA186&ots=GJEtI3bT78&dq=rhodesian%20lisbon%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&pg=PA186#v=onepage&q=rhodesian%20lisbon%20%22accredited%20diplomatic%20representative%22&f=true ''International Diplomacy and Colonial Retreat''], Kent Fedorowich, Martin Thomas
During 1965, the government of [[Rhodesia]], as the colony now called itself, made moves to establish a [[Rhodesian mission in Lisbon|mission in Lisbon]] separate from the British Embassy, with its own accredited representative, prompting protests from the British government, which insisted that the representative, Harry Reedman, should be a nominal member of the British Ambassador's staff.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=fWxAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iKMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2768,3715462&hl=en Rhodesia's Man in Lisbon: Objective Said To Be Achieved] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307211051/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=fWxAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=iKMMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2768,3715462&hl=en |date=7 March 2016 }}, ''The Glasgow Herald'', 22 September 1965. page 9</ref> For their part, the Portuguese authorities sought a compromise whereby they would accept Reedman as an independent representative but deny him diplomatic status.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ccm1AQAAQBAJ&dq=rhodesian+lisbon+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA186 ''International Diplomacy and Colonial Retreat''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115546/https://books.google.com/books?id=ccm1AQAAQBAJ&dq=rhodesian+lisbon+%22accredited+diplomatic+representative%22&pg=PA186 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Kent Fedorowich, Martin Thomas
Routledge, 2013, page 186</ref>
Routledge, 2013, page 186</ref>


==Trade missions==
==Trade missions==
===South Africa and neighbouring countries===
===South Africa and neighbouring countries===
Under [[apartheid]], South Africa maintained trade missions in neighbouring countries with which it did not have diplomatic relations, such as [[Rhodesia]] (now [[Zimbabwe]]),<ref>[https://apnews.com/96fa7391e2061f8e2bbfda8dea8b4694 Thousands Rampage Through Harare, Upset Over Machel's Death], ''[[Associated Press]]'', 21 October 1986</ref> where, following the country's independence, the "South African Diplomatic Mission" in [[Harare|Salisbury (now Harare)]] was closed.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=uMRYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=v5IDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5283%2C3162778 Salisbury whites queue up to flee], ''[[The Age]]'', 8 July 1980</ref> A trade mission was also established in [[Maputo]], [[Mozambique]],<ref>[http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1986-11-05/news/0270130070_1_malawi-south-africa-apartheid Youths Attack South African Trade Mission], ''[[United Press International]]'', 5 November 1986</ref> in 1984, nine years after the South African consulate was closed following independence in 1975.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=iUZRAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22south+african+trade+mission%22+lourenco+marques&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22south+african+trade+mission%22+ ''South Africa, 1987–1988''], Department of Foreign Affairs, page 207</ref>
Under [[apartheid]], South Africa maintained trade missions in neighbouring countries with which it did not have diplomatic relations, such as [[Rhodesia]] (now [[Zimbabwe]]),<ref>[https://apnews.com/96fa7391e2061f8e2bbfda8dea8b4694 Thousands Rampage Through Harare, Upset Over Machel's Death] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201219024746/https://apnews.com/96fa7391e2061f8e2bbfda8dea8b4694 |date=19 December 2020 }}, ''[[Associated Press]]'', 21 October 1986</ref> where, following the country's independence, the "South African Diplomatic Mission" in [[Harare|Salisbury (now Harare)]] was closed.<ref>[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=uMRYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=v5IDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5283%2C3162778 Salisbury whites queue up to flee] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307210015/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=uMRYAAAAIBAJ&sjid=v5IDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5283%2C3162778 |date=7 March 2016 }}, ''[[The Age]]'', 8 July 1980</ref> A trade mission was also established in [[Maputo]], [[Mozambique]],<ref>[https://www.orlandosentinel.com/1986/11/05/youths-attack-south-african-trade-mission/ Youths Attack South African Trade Mission], ''[[United Press International]]'', 5 November 1986</ref> in 1984, nine years after the South African consulate was closed following independence in 1975.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=iUZRAQAAIAAJ&q=%22south+african+trade+mission%22+ ''South Africa, 1987–1988''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124543/https://books.google.com/books?id=iUZRAQAAIAAJ&q=%22south+african+trade+mission%22+ |date=30 March 2023 }}, Department of Foreign Affairs, page 207</ref>


Similarly, [[Mauritius]] maintained a trade mission in [[Johannesburg]], the country's commercial capital,<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/28/world/port-louis-journal-land-of-apartheid-befriends-an-indian-ocean-isle.html Port Louis Journal; Land of Apartheid Befriends an Indian Ocean Isle], ''The New York Times'', 28 December 1987</ref> as did Zimbabwe, after the closure of its missions in [[Pretoria]] and [[Cape Town]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=_q5A-Ve8ogIC&lpg=PA68&ots=neGYSIPxrz&dq=south%20african%20trade%20mission%20harare&pg=PA68#v=onepage&q=south%20african%20trade%20mission%20harare&f=true ''Coming To Terms: Zimbabwe in the International Arena''], Richard Schwartz
Similarly, [[Mauritius]] maintained a trade mission in [[Johannesburg]], the country's commercial capital,<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/28/world/port-louis-journal-land-of-apartheid-befriends-an-indian-ocean-isle.html Port Louis Journal; Land of Apartheid Befriends an Indian Ocean Isle] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308161628/https://www.nytimes.com/1987/12/28/world/port-louis-journal-land-of-apartheid-befriends-an-indian-ocean-isle.html |date=8 March 2021 }}, ''The New York Times'', 28 December 1987</ref> as did Zimbabwe, after the closure of its missions in [[Pretoria]] and [[Cape Town]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=_q5A-Ve8ogIC&dq=south+african+trade+mission+harare&pg=PA68 ''Coming To Terms: Zimbabwe in the International Arena''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124544/https://books.google.com/books?id=_q5A-Ve8ogIC&dq=south+african+trade+mission+harare&pg=PA68 |date=30 March 2023 }}, Richard Schwartz
I.B.Tauris, 2001, page 68</ref>
I.B.Tauris, 2001, page 68</ref>


Following majority rule in 1994, full diplomatic relations were established, and these became [[High Commissioner (Commonwealth)|High Commission]]s, after South Africa rejoined the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=aqAvAQAAIAAJ&q=%22south+african+high+commission%22+harare&dq=%22south+african+high+commission%22+harare&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiUmrKRq5HMAhUGcz4KHdDfDQ4Q6AEIMjAF ''Portfolio of South Africa''], Portfolio Publications, 1999
Following majority rule in 1994, full diplomatic relations were established, and these became [[High Commissioner (Commonwealth)|High Commission]]s, after South Africa rejoined the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=aqAvAQAAIAAJ&q=%22south+african+high+commission%22+harare ''Portfolio of South Africa''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115458/https://books.google.com/books?id=aqAvAQAAIAAJ&q=%22south+african+high+commission%22+harare |date=11 April 2023 }}, Portfolio Publications, 1999</ref>
</ref>


===South Korea and China===
===South Korea and China===
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, [[South Korea]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established trade offices in [[Beijing]] and [[Seoul]], under the auspices of the [[China Council for the Promotion of International Trade]], and [[KOTRA]], the Korea Trade Promotion Corporation respectively.<ref>[http://articles.latimes.com/1990-10-21/news/mn-4285_1_north-korea S. Korea, China Agree to Set Up Trade Offices : Asia: The diplomatic accord is another setback for Communist North Korea, an ally of Beijing.], Los Angeles Times, 21 October 1990</ref> The South Korean office in Beijing was established in January 1991, while the Chinese office was established in April of that year.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=RdmmvCKxp3MC&lpg=PA215&ots=0ogaKB4Jej&dq=KOTRA%20beijing%201991&pg=PA215#v=onepage&q=KOTRA%20beijing%201991&f=true China and South Korea in a New Triangle], ''Emerging Patterns of East Asian Investment in China: From Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong'', Sumner J. La Croix
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, [[South Korea]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established trade offices in [[Beijing]] and [[Seoul]], under the auspices of the [[China Council for the Promotion of International Trade]], and [[KOTRA]], the Korea Trade Promotion Corporation respectively.<ref>[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-10-21-mn-4285-story.html S. Korea, China Agree to Set Up Trade Offices : Asia: The diplomatic accord is another setback for Communist North Korea, an ally of Beijing.], Los Angeles Times, 21 October 1990</ref> The South Korean office in Beijing was established in January 1991, while the Chinese office was established in April of that year.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=RdmmvCKxp3MC&dq=KOTRA+beijing+1991&pg=PA215 China and South Korea in a New Triangle] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124550/https://books.google.com/books?id=RdmmvCKxp3MC&dq=KOTRA+beijing+1991&pg=PA215 |date=30 March 2023 }}, ''Emerging Patterns of East Asian Investment in China: From Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong'', Sumner J. La Croix
M.E. Sharpe, 1995, page 215</ref>
M.E. Sharpe, 1995, page 215</ref>


==Other missions==
==Other missions==
===South Africa and China===
===South Africa and China===
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1998, [[South Africa]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established "cultural centres" in [[Beijing]] and [[Pretoria]], known as the '''South African Centre for Chinese Studies''' and the '''Chinese Centre for South African Studies''' respectively.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=tKmnESFGY8MC&lpg=PA68&ots=KoYTIMlig0&dq=Chinese%20Centre%20for%20South%20African%20Studies%20Pretoria&pg=PA68#v=onepage&q=Chinese%20Centre%20for%20South%20African%20Studies%20Pretoria&f=true ''Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy: The Micro-macro Linkage Approach''], Quansheng Zhao
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1998, [[South Africa]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established "cultural centres" in [[Beijing]] and [[Pretoria]], known as the '''South African Centre for Chinese Studies''' and the '''Chinese Centre for South African Studies''' respectively.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=tKmnESFGY8MC&dq=Chinese+Centre+for+South+African+Studies+Pretoria&pg=PA68 ''Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy: The Micro-macro Linkage Approach''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115509/https://books.google.com/books?id=tKmnESFGY8MC&dq=Chinese+Centre+for+South+African+Studies+Pretoria&pg=PA68 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Quansheng Zhao
Oxford University Press, 1996, page 68</ref> Although the Centres, each headed by a Director, did not use [[diplomatic title]]s, [[national flags]], or [[Coat of arms|coats of arms]], their staff used [[diplomatic passport]]s and were issued with diplomatic identity documents, while their vehicles had [[Vehicle registration plates of the People's Republic of China#Embassies and consulates|diplomatic number plates]].<ref>[http://www.chinese-embassy.org.za/eng/zxxx/t419835.htm Establishing the SA Mission in the PRC], Embassy of the People's Republic of China, 31 March 2008</ref> They also performed visa and consular services.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=zIxFBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA424&lpg=PA424&dq=%22Chinese+Centre+for+South+African+Studies%22&source=bl&ots=MBIRvNAs_Q&sig=pxAy4eaUiFz5NnMo5tuKwWjCh30&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3iIKf6JPMAhWJSRoKHZ0QDbMQ6AEIIDAB#v=onepage&q=%22Chinese%20Centre%20for%20South%20African%20Studies%22&f=true ''Colour, Confusion and Concessions: The History of the Chinese in South Africa''], Hong Kong University Press, 1996, page 424</ref>
Oxford University Press, 1996, page 68</ref> Although the Centres, each headed by a Director, did not use [[diplomatic title]]s, [[national flags]], or [[Coat of arms|coats of arms]], their staff used [[diplomatic passport]]s and were issued with diplomatic identity documents, while their vehicles had [[Vehicle registration plates of the People's Republic of China#Embassies and consulates|diplomatic number plates]].<ref>[http://www.chinese-embassy.org.za/eng/zxxx/t419835.htm Establishing the SA Mission in the PRC] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160924145225/http://www.chinese-embassy.org.za/eng/zxxx/t419835.htm |date=24 September 2016 }}, Embassy of the People's Republic of China, 31 March 2008</ref> They also performed visa and consular services.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=zIxFBAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Chinese+Centre+for+South+African+Studies%22&pg=PA424 ''Colour, Confusion and Concessions: The History of the Chinese in South Africa''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115510/https://books.google.com/books?id=zIxFBAAAQBAJ&dq=%22Chinese+Centre+for+South+African+Studies%22&pg=PA424 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Hong Kong University Press, 1996, page 424</ref>


===Israel and China===
===Israel and China===
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, [[Israel]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established representative offices in [[Beijing]] and [[Tel Aviv]]. The Israeli office was formally known as the Liaison Office of the [[Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=2A0tMFWCdaQC&lpg=PR9&ots=8wc3nVL0MS&dq=israel%20academy%20of%20sciences%20and%20humanities%20beijing&pg=PR9#v=onepage&q=israel%20academy%20of%20sciences%20and%20humanities%20beijing&f=true ''A China Diary: Towards the Establishment of China-Israel Diplomatic Relations''], E. Zev Sufott, Frank Cass, 1997, page ix</ref> This was opened in June 1990.<ref>[https://apnews.com/5f28da673907221e05a06d63c63ba3ed Israel Strengthening Representation in China], [[Associated Press]], 9 January 1991</ref> China was similarly represented by a branch of the China International Travel Service, which also opened in 1990.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=o51KAQAAIAAJ&dq=china+de+facto+travel+office+tel+aviv+1990&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22china+international+travel+service%22 ''IDSA News Review on East Asia''], Volume 5, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 1991, page 375</ref>
Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, [[Israel]] and the [[People's Republic of China]] established representative offices in [[Beijing]] and [[Tel Aviv]]. The Israeli office was formally known as the Liaison Office of the [[Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=2A0tMFWCdaQC&dq=israel+academy+of+sciences+and+humanities+beijing&pg=PR9 ''A China Diary: Towards the Establishment of China-Israel Diplomatic Relations''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115502/https://books.google.com/books?id=2A0tMFWCdaQC&dq=israel+academy+of+sciences+and+humanities+beijing&pg=PR9 |date=11 April 2023 }}, E. Zev Sufott, Frank Cass, 1997, page ix</ref> This was opened in June 1990.<ref>[https://apnews.com/5f28da673907221e05a06d63c63ba3ed Israel Strengthening Representation in China] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210917081549/https://apnews.com/5f28da673907221e05a06d63c63ba3ed |date=17 September 2021 }}, [[Associated Press]], 9 January 1991</ref> China was similarly represented by a branch of the China International Travel Service, which also opened in 1990.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=o51KAQAAIAAJ&q=%22china+international+travel+service%22 ''IDSA News Review on East Asia''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411125442/https://books.google.com/books?id=o51KAQAAIAAJ&q=%22china+international+travel+service%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Volume 5, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 1991, page 375</ref>


===United States===
===United States===


In the U.S., “diplomatic couriers” do “enjoy the privileges and immunities specified in the Vienna Convention,” as well as “their families,” and “the members of the mission,” even “the mission” itself; with respect to a nonparty to the Vienna Convention.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/254b | title=22 U.S. Code § 254b - Privileges and immunities of mission of nonparty to Vienna Convention | access-date=27 November 2022 | archive-date=27 November 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221127014236/https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/254b | url-status=live }}</ref>


==Liaison offices==

In the U.S., “diplomatic couriers” do “enjoy the privileges and immunities specified in the Vienna Convention,” as well as “their families,” and “the members of the mission,” even “the mission” itself; with respect to a nonparty to the Vienna Convention.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/254b | title=22 U.S. Code § 254b - Privileges and immunities of mission of nonparty to Vienna Convention }}</ref>

==Liaison Offices==


===Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia===
===Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia===
Until 2019, [[Greece]] and the then [[Republic of Macedonia]] only maintained "Liaison Offices", with Greece being represented in [[Skopje]] by a mission known as the "Liaison Office of the Hellenic Republic",<ref>[http://www.mfa.gr/en/blog/greece-bilateral-relations/fyrom/ F.Y.R.O.M. – Greece's Bilateral Relations], Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greece</ref> and Macedonia by the "Liaison Office of the Republic of Macedonia" in [[Athens]].<ref>[http://www.mfa.gov.mk/index.php/en/media-centar/macedonia-in-the-world/1685-2015-11-03-15-17-16 Interview for IBNA of Darko Angelov, Head of the liaison office of Republic of Macedonia in Athens], Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Macedonia, 29 October 2015</ref> This was to the [[Macedonia naming dispute|naming dispute]] between the two states, but following the Republic of Macedonia adoption of the name "[[North Macedonia]]" and the signing of an [[Prespa agreement|agreement]] with Greece, the two countries' diplomatic missions were upgraded to embassies, with Greece's representation in [[Bitola]] and North Macedonia's representation in [[Thessaloniki]] being upgraded to Consulates-General.<ref>[https://apnews.com/64493b24185e4055adf5bf5ecdc56910 Greece, North Macedonia open embassies after name deal], [[Associated Press|AP]], May 31, 2019</ref>
Until 2019, [[Greece]] and the then [[Republic of Macedonia]] only maintained "Liaison Offices", with Greece being represented in [[Skopje]] by a mission known as the "Liaison Office of the Hellenic Republic",<ref>[http://www.mfa.gr/en/blog/greece-bilateral-relations/fyrom/ F.Y.R.O.M. – Greece's Bilateral Relations] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160201081708/http://www.mfa.gr/en/blog/greece-bilateral-relations/fyrom/ |date=1 February 2016 }}, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greece</ref> and Macedonia by the "Liaison Office of the Republic of Macedonia" in [[Athens]].<ref>[http://www.mfa.gov.mk/index.php/en/media-centar/macedonia-in-the-world/1685-2015-11-03-15-17-16 Interview for IBNA of Darko Angelov, Head of the liaison office of Republic of Macedonia in Athens] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210804230208/https://www.mfa.gov.mk/index.php/en/media-centar/macedonia-in-the-world/1685-2015-11-03-15-17-16 |date=4 August 2021 }}, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Macedonia, 29 October 2015</ref> This was to the [[Macedonia naming dispute|naming dispute]] between the two states, but following the Republic of Macedonia adoption of the name "[[North Macedonia]]" and the signing of an [[Prespa agreement|agreement]] with Greece, the two countries' diplomatic missions were upgraded to embassies, with Greece's representation in [[Bitola]] and North Macedonia's representation in [[Thessaloniki]] being upgraded to Consulates-General.<ref>[https://apnews.com/64493b24185e4055adf5bf5ecdc56910 Greece, North Macedonia open embassies after name deal] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190611182139/https://apnews.com/64493b24185e4055adf5bf5ecdc56910 |date=11 June 2019 }}, [[Associated Press|AP]], May 31, 2019</ref>


===Vietnam and the United States===
===Vietnam and the United States===
In January 1995, [[Vietnam]] and the [[United States]] established "Liaison Offices" in [[Washington DC|Washington]] and [[Hanoi]], the first such diplomatic representation in the two countries since the end of the [[Vietnam War]], when the US-backed [[South Vietnam]] [[Fall of Saigon|fell]] to the Communist-controlled [[North Vietnam|North]].<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/01/28/us-and-vietnam-agree-to-open-liaison-offices/c2835b88-f41c-4f96-8afc-8b609c60a060/ U.S., Vietnam to Establish Liaison Offices], ''The Washington Post'', Thomas W. Lippman 28 January 1995</ref> On 11 July, President Bill Clinton announced the normalisation of relations between the two countries, and the following month, both countries upgraded their Liaison Offices to Embassy status, with the United States later opening a [[consulate general]] in [[Ho Chi Minh City]] and Vietnam opening a [[consulate]] in [[San Francisco]], [[California]].<ref>[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=A2RaAAAAYAAJ&q=%22In+August+1995,+both+nations+upgraded+their+Liaison+Offices+opened+during+January+1995+to+embassy+status%22&dq=%22In+August+1995,+both+nations+upgraded+their+Liaison+Offices+opened+during+January+1995+to+embassy+status%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-qp_0087WAhXPbVAKHc-jCq8Q6AEIWjAJ ''Political Risk Yearbook: East Asia & the Pacific''], PRS Group, 2008, page 27</ref>
In January 1995, [[Vietnam]] and the [[United States]] established "Liaison Offices" in [[Washington DC|Washington]] and [[Hanoi]], the first such diplomatic representation in the two countries since the end of the [[Vietnam War]], when the US-backed [[South Vietnam]] [[Fall of Saigon|fell]] to the Communist-controlled [[North Vietnam|North]].<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/01/28/us-and-vietnam-agree-to-open-liaison-offices/c2835b88-f41c-4f96-8afc-8b609c60a060/ U.S., Vietnam to Establish Liaison Offices] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171006212554/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/01/28/us-and-vietnam-agree-to-open-liaison-offices/c2835b88-f41c-4f96-8afc-8b609c60a060/ |date=6 October 2017 }}, ''The Washington Post'', Thomas W. Lippman 28 January 1995</ref> On 11 July, President Bill Clinton announced the normalisation of relations between the two countries, and the following month, both countries upgraded their Liaison Offices to Embassy status, with the United States later opening a [[consulate general]] in [[Ho Chi Minh City]] and Vietnam opening a [[consulate]] in [[San Francisco]], [[California]].<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=A2RaAAAAYAAJ&q=%22In+August+1995,+both+nations+upgraded+their+Liaison+Offices+opened+during+January+1995+to+embassy+status%22 ''Political Risk Yearbook: East Asia & the Pacific''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115503/https://books.google.com/books?id=A2RaAAAAYAAJ&q=%22In+August+1995,+both+nations+upgraded+their+Liaison+Offices+opened+during+January+1995+to+embassy+status%22 |date=11 April 2023 }}, PRS Group, 2008, page 27</ref>


===China and the United States===
===China and the United States===
[[File:Leonard F. Woodcock.jpg|thumb|Leonard Woodcock, last Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" and first Ambassador of the United States to the People's Republic of China]]
[[File:Leonard F. Woodcock.jpg|thumb|Leonard Woodcock, last Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" and first Ambassador of the United States to the People's Republic of China]]
Following President [[Richard Nixon]]'s [[1972 Nixon visit to China|visit to China]], the United States and the People's Republic of China agreed to open "Liaison Offices" in [[Washington DC|Washington]] and Beijing in 1973, described by Secretary of State [[Henry Kissinger]] as "embassies in all but name".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ty3vX1CCS88C&pg=PA402&lpg=PA402&dq=United+States+and+the+China+agreed+to+open+%22Liaison+Offices%22+in+Washington+and+Beijing+in+1973&source=bl&ots=pSj8oxtbkq&sig=Ema6wO3_XoCJBWr3jo5F3LdY370&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHjv7d3tXKAhVH6RQKHTgLCUwQ6AEISzAI#v=onepage&q=United%20States%20and%20the%20China%20agreed%20to%20open%20%22Liaison%20Offices%22%20in%20Washington%20and%20Beijing%20in%201973&f=true ''A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency''], William P. Bundy, I.B.Tauris, 1998, page 402</ref>
Following President [[Richard Nixon]]'s [[1972 Nixon visit to China|visit to China]], the United States and the People's Republic of China agreed to open "Liaison Offices" in [[Washington DC|Washington]] and Beijing in 1973, described by Secretary of State [[Henry Kissinger]] as "embassies in all but name".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ty3vX1CCS88C&dq=United+States+and+the+China+agreed+to+open+%22Liaison+Offices%22+in+Washington+and+Beijing+in+1973&pg=PA402 ''A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230330124557/https://books.google.com/books?id=ty3vX1CCS88C&dq=United+States+and+the+China+agreed+to+open+%22Liaison+Offices%22+in+Washington+and+Beijing+in+1973&pg=PA402 |date=30 March 2023 }}, William P. Bundy, I.B.Tauris, 1998, page 402</ref>


Although the Embassy of the [[Republic of China|Republic of China on Taiwan]] remained, it increasingly became overshadowed by the "Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China",<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=yf4lWrgUzlIC&pg=PA137&lpg=PA137&dq=Liaison+Office+of+the+People%27s+Republic+of+China+in+Washington&source=bl&ots=iRndyrTvJA&sig=Ddi6y7ti6wS2rVkplsXPxwu2Cok&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiR-5XkqdTKAhVLAxoKHahRBeYQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=Liaison%20Office%20of%20the%20People's%20Republic%20of%20China%20in%20Washington&f=true ''Chiang Ching-kuo's Leadership in the Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan''], Shao Chuan Leng, University Press of America, 1993, page 137</ref> which, under Executive Order 11771, was accorded the same privileges and immunities enjoyed by the diplomatic missions accredited to the United States.<ref>[http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=106792 Executive Order 11771 – Extending Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities to the Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China in Washington, DC and to Members Thereof], RICHARD NIXON, The White House, 18 March 1974</ref>
Although the Embassy of the [[Republic of China|Republic of China on Taiwan]] remained, it increasingly became overshadowed by the "Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China",<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=yf4lWrgUzlIC&dq=Liaison+Office+of+the+People%27s+Republic+of+China+in+Washington&pg=PA137 ''Chiang Ching-kuo's Leadership in the Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230411115516/https://books.google.com/books?id=yf4lWrgUzlIC&dq=Liaison+Office+of+the+People%27s+Republic+of+China+in+Washington&pg=PA137 |date=11 April 2023 }}, Shao Chuan Leng, University Press of America, 1993, page 137</ref> which, under Executive Order 11771, was accorded the same privileges and immunities enjoyed by the diplomatic missions accredited to the United States.<ref>[http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=106792 Executive Order 11771 – Extending Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities to the Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China in Washington, DC and to Members Thereof] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171114224738/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=106792 |date=14 November 2017 }}, RICHARD NIXON, The White House, 18 March 1974</ref>


[[George H. W. Bush]], later vice-president under [[Ronald Reagan]] and President between 1989 and 1993, served as Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" in Beijing between 1974 and 1975.<ref>[http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8597.html ''The China Diary of George H. W. Bush: The Making of a Global President''], Jeffrey A. Engel, Princeton University Press, 2008</ref> The last holder of the post was [[Leonard Woodcock]], formerly president of the [[United Auto Workers]], who became the first [[Ambassador of the United States to the People's Republic of China|Ambassador]] when full diplomatic relations were established in 1979.<ref>[http://articles.latimes.com/2001/jan/18/local/me-13684 Leonard Woodcock; President of United Auto Workers Union, Envoy to China], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 18 January 2001</ref>
[[George H. W. Bush]], later vice-president under [[Ronald Reagan]] and President between 1989 and 1993, served as Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" in Beijing between 1974 and 1975.<ref>[http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8597.html ''The China Diary of George H. W. Bush: The Making of a Global President''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160611130039/http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8597.html |date=11 June 2016 }}, Jeffrey A. Engel, Princeton University Press, 2008</ref> The last holder of the post was [[Leonard Woodcock]], formerly president of the [[United Auto Workers]], who became the first [[Ambassador of the United States to the People's Republic of China|Ambassador]] when full diplomatic relations were established in 1979.<ref>[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-jan-18-me-13684-story.html Leonard Woodcock; President of United Auto Workers Union, Envoy to China], ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 18 January 2001</ref>


===North Korea and South Korea===
===North Korea and South Korea===
The joint [[Inter-Korean Liaison Office]] was established as part of [[Panmunjom Declaration]] signed by North Korean leader [[Kim Jong-un]] and South Korean President [[Moon Jae-in]] on April 27, 2018, during the [[April 2018 inter-Korean summit|2018 inter-Korean Summit]] in Panmunjom. The joint liaison office provided direct communication channel for the two Koreas.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/14/world/asia/north-south-korea-liaison-office.html North and South Korea Open Full-Time Liaison Office at Border], ''[[The New York Times]]'', September 14, 2018</ref> The office was blown up with explosives by the DPRK at 2:50 PM local time on 16 June 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-06-16|title=Alert: South Korea says North Korea blew up an inter-Korean liaison office amid rising tensions between the rivals|url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Alert-South-Korea-says-North-Korea-blew-up-an-15342664.php|access-date=2020-06-16|website=SFChronicle.com|language=en-US|archive-date=17 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200617052033/https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Alert-South-Korea-says-North-Korea-blew-up-an-15342664.php|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The joint [[Inter-Korean Liaison Office]] was established as part of [[Panmunjom Declaration]] signed by North Korean leader [[Kim Jong-un]] and South Korean President [[Moon Jae-in]] on April 27, 2018, during the [[April 2018 inter-Korean summit|2018 inter-Korean Summit]] in Panmunjom. The joint liaison office provided direct communication channel for the two Koreas.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/14/world/asia/north-south-korea-liaison-office.html North and South Korea Open Full-Time Liaison Office at Border] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925124453/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/14/world/asia/north-south-korea-liaison-office.html |date=25 September 2019 }}, ''[[The New York Times]]'', September 14, 2018</ref> The office was blown up with explosives by the DPRK at 2:50 PM local time on 16 June 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-06-16|title=Alert: South Korea says North Korea blew up an inter-Korean liaison office amid rising tensions between the rivals|url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Alert-South-Korea-says-North-Korea-blew-up-an-15342664.php|access-date=2020-06-16|website=SFChronicle.com|language=en-US|archive-date=17 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200617052033/https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Alert-South-Korea-says-North-Korea-blew-up-an-15342664.php|url-status=dead}}</ref>


===North Korea and Japan===
===North Korea and Japan===
There are no diplomatic relations between the North Korea and Japan. [[Chongryon]] functions as North Korea's ''de facto'' embassy in [[Japan]].<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/world/dprk/chosen_soren.htm |title=Chosen Soren |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |access-date=2010-10-01}}</ref><ref>"[http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view_article.php?article_id=71942 Stage set for Japan to seize North Korea's 'embassy'] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081002164145/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view_article.php?article_id=71942 |date=October 2, 2008 }}." ''[[Agence France-Presse]]''. June 18, 2007. Retrieved on January 15, 2009.</ref>
There are no diplomatic relations between the North Korea and Japan. [[Chongryon]] functions as North Korea's ''de facto'' embassy in [[Japan]].<ref>{{cite web |author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/world/dprk/chosen_soren.htm |title=Chosen Soren |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |access-date=2010-10-01 |archive-date=7 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201007180616/https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/world/dprk/chosen_soren.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>"[http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view_article.php?article_id=71942 Stage set for Japan to seize North Korea's 'embassy'] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081002164145/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view_article.php?article_id=71942 |date=October 2, 2008 }}." ''[[Agence France-Presse]]''. June 18, 2007. Retrieved on January 15, 2009.</ref>


===Kosovo and Serbia===
===Kosovo and Serbia===
Under the terms of the [[Brussels Agreement (2013)|Brussels Agreement]] signed in 2013, the governments of [[Serbia]] and [[Kosovo]] agreed to post liaison officers in each others capitals.<ref>https://normalizacija.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Споразум-о-размени-официра-за-везу-EN.pdf</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://balkaninsight.com/2013/06/17/kosovo-and-serbia-exchange-liaison-officers/ | title=Serbia and Kosovo Begin Direct Liaisons | date=17 June 2013 }}</ref> The [[Government of Kosovo]] is represented in Serbia by the [[Liaison Office of Kosovo, Belgrade]]<ref>{{cite web | url=https://ambasadat.net/Serbi | title=Beograd - Ambasadat e Republikës së Kosovës | date=25 January 2022 }}</ref> and likewise the [[Government of Serbia]] is represented in Kosovo by the [[Liaison Office of Serbia, Pristina]].<ref>https://www.kosovo-online.com/en/news/society/belgrades-liaison-officer-sent-request-pristina-visit-dejan-pantic-12-12-2022</ref> Both these missions are hosted by the [[European Union]].
Under the terms of the [[Brussels Agreement (2013)|Brussels Agreement]] signed in 2013, the governments of [[Serbia]] and [[Kosovo]] agreed to post liaison officers in each other's capitals.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://normalizacija.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BC-%D0%BE-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8-%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83-EN.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=11 April 2023 |archive-date=23 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230223135033/https://normalizacija.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BC-%D0%BE-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8-%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B7%D1%83-EN.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://balkaninsight.com/2013/06/17/kosovo-and-serbia-exchange-liaison-officers/ | title=Serbia and Kosovo Begin Direct Liaisons | date=17 June 2013 | access-date=23 February 2023 | archive-date=23 February 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230223133926/https://balkaninsight.com/2013/06/17/kosovo-and-serbia-exchange-liaison-officers/ | url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Government of Kosovo]] is represented in Serbia by the [[Liaison Office of Kosovo, Belgrade]]<ref>{{cite web | url=https://ambasadat.net/Serbi | title=Beograd - Ambasadat e Republikës së Kosovës | date=25 January 2022 | access-date=23 February 2023 | archive-date=23 February 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230223115906/https://ambasadat.net/Serbi | url-status=live }}</ref> and likewise the [[Government of Serbia]] is represented in Kosovo by the [[Liaison Office of Serbia, Pristina]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.kosovo-online.com/en/news/society/belgrades-liaison-officer-sent-request-pristina-visit-dejan-pantic-12-12-2022 |title=Belgrade's liaison officer sent a request to Pristina to visit Dejan Pantic - Kosovo Online |access-date=23 February 2023 |archive-date=19 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219074732/https://www.kosovo-online.com/en/news/society/belgrades-liaison-officer-sent-request-pristina-visit-dejan-pantic-12-12-2022 |url-status=live }}</ref> Under the terms of the [[Agreement on the path to normalisation between Kosovo and Serbia|EU proposed agreement]] that was accepted by both parties in March 2023, the liaison offices in each country are to be upgraded to Permanent Missions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-eu-proposal-agreement-path-normalisation-between-kosovo-and-serbia_en|title=Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: EU Proposal - Agreement on the path to normalisation between Kosovo and Serbia &#124; EEAS Website|website=www.eeas.europa.eu|accessdate=21 March 2023|archive-date=20 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320204024/https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-eu-proposal-agreement-path-normalisation-between-kosovo-and-serbia_en|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-implementation-annex-agreement-path-normalisation-relations-between_en|title=Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: Implementation Annex to the Agreement on the Path to Normalisation of Relations between Kosovo and Serbia &#124; EEAS Website|website=www.eeas.europa.eu|accessdate=21 March 2023|archive-date=19 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230319091913/https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-implementation-annex-agreement-path-normalisation-relations-between_en|url-status=live}}</ref>

===Republic of Somaliland===
The [[Republic of Somaliland]], which claims to be the legal successor to the short-lived [[State of Somaliland]] maintains a network of [[List of representative offices of Somaliland|liaison offices]] around the world. Several states also maintain [[List of diplomatic missions in Somaliland|missions]] in Somaliland.


==Interests sections==
==Interests sections==
{{See also|Protecting power}}
{{See also|Protecting power}}


When two nations break off diplomatic relations, their former embassies are usually turned over to third countries that act as [[protecting powers]]. The protecting power is responsible for all diplomatic communications on behalf of the protected power. When the situation improves, the feuding countries may be willing to accept diplomats from the other country on an unofficial basis. The original embassy is known as an "interests section" of the embassy of the protecting power. For example, until 2015, the Cuban Interests Section was staffed by Cubans and located in the old [[Embassy of Cuba, Washington, D.C.|Cuban Embassy in Washington]], but it was officially an interests section of the [[Embassy of Switzerland, Washington, D.C.|Swiss Embassy to the United States]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Krauss |first1=Clifford |title=Swiss to Sponsor Cuba's Diplomats |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/12/world/swiss-to-sponsor-cuba-s-diplomats.html |work=The New York Times |date=12 February 1991 |language=en}}</ref>
When two nations break off diplomatic relations, their former embassies are usually turned over to third countries that act as [[protecting powers]]. The protecting power is responsible for all diplomatic communications on behalf of the protected power. When the situation improves, the feuding countries may be willing to accept diplomats from the other country on an unofficial basis. The original embassy is known as an "interests section" of the embassy of the protecting power. For example, until 2015, the Cuban Interests Section was staffed by Cubans and located in the old [[Embassy of Cuba, Washington, D.C.|Cuban Embassy in Washington]], but it was officially an interests section of the [[Embassy of Switzerland, Washington, D.C.|Swiss Embassy to the United States]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Krauss |first1=Clifford |title=Swiss to Sponsor Cuba's Diplomats |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/12/world/swiss-to-sponsor-cuba-s-diplomats.html |work=The New York Times |date=12 February 1991 |language=en |access-date=2 December 2018 |archive-date=23 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423085035/https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/12/world/swiss-to-sponsor-cuba-s-diplomats.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 275: Line 275:
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}


{{-}}
{{Clear}}
{{Diplomacy}}
{{Diplomacy}}



Latest revision as of 01:09, 26 October 2024

A de facto embassy is an office or organisation that serves de facto as an embassy in the absence of normal or official diplomatic relations among countries, usually to represent nations which lack full diplomatic recognition, regions or dependencies of countries, or territories over which sovereignty is disputed. In some cases, diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality may be granted.[1]

Alternatively, states which have broken off direct bilateral ties will be represented by an "interests section" of another embassy, belonging to a third country that has agreed to serve as a protecting power and is recognised by both states. When relations are exceptionally tense, such as during a war, the interests section is staffed by diplomats from the protecting power. For example, when Iraq and the U.S. broke diplomatic relations due to the Gulf War, Poland became the protecting power for the United States. The United States Interests Section of the Polish Embassy in Iraq was headed by a Polish diplomat.[2] However, if the host country agrees, an interests section may be staffed by diplomats from the sending country. From 1977 to 2015, the United States Interests Section in Havana was staffed by Americans, even though it was formally a section of the Swiss Embassy to Cuba.

Governments of states not recognized by the receiving state and of territories that make no claim to be sovereign states may set up offices abroad that do not have official diplomatic status as defined by the Vienna Convention. Examples include the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Offices; Somaliland's Representative Offices in London, Addis Ababa, Rome, and Washington, D.C.; the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices that represent the government of that territory; and Gibraltar House, Bermuda House and Falkland House in London, representing the three dependent territories in their "motherland". Such offices assume some of the non-diplomatic functions of diplomatic posts, such as promoting trade interests and providing assistance to its citizens and residents. They are nevertheless not diplomatic missions, their personnel are not diplomats and do not have diplomatic visas, although there may be legislation providing for personal immunities and tax privileges, as in the case of the Hong Kong offices in London and Toronto, for example.

Taiwan

[edit]
Diplomatic relations between world states and the Republic of China today
  Countries recognizing PRC only, having no relation with ROC
  Countries recognizing PRC only, but keeping an informal relation, or set the de facto embassy mutually with MFA of ROC or legislated significant series of laws
  Countries recognizing Government of ROC only

Foreign missions in Taiwan

[edit]

Many countries maintain formal diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China but operate unofficial "trade missions" or "representative offices" in Taipei to deal with Taiwan-related commercial and consular issues. Often, these delegations may forward visa applications to their nearest embassy or consulate rather than processing them locally.[3]

When the United States recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate entity of "China" in 1979, it established a non-governmental body known as the American Institute in Taiwan to serve its interests on the island. By contrast, other countries were represented by privately operated bodies; the United Kingdom was informally represented by the "Anglo-Taiwan Trade Committee", while France was similarly represented by a "Trade Office".[4]

Japan–Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei.

These were later renamed the "British Trade and Cultural Office" and "French Institute" respectively, and, were headed by career diplomats on secondment, rather than being operated by chambers of commerce or trade departments.[4]

France now maintains a "French Office in Taipei", with cultural, consular and economic sections,[5] while the "British Office"[6] and German Institute Taipei[7] perform similar functions on behalf of the United Kingdom and Germany.

Other countries which have broken off diplomatic relations with Taiwan also established de facto missions. In 1972, Japan established the "Interchange Association, Japan" (renamed the "Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association" in 2017),[8] headed by personnel "on leave" from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.[9] This became known as the "Japanese formula", and would be adopted by other countries like the Philippines in 1975, which established the "Asian Exchange Center", replacing its former embassy.[10] This was renamed the "Manila Economic and Cultural Office" in 1989.[11]

Australia ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, but did not establish an "Australian Commerce and Industry Office" until 1981.[12] This was under control of the Australian Chamber of Commerce.[13] It was renamed the "Australian Office in Taipei" in 2012.[14] By contrast, New Zealand, which also ended formal diplomatic relations in 1972, did not establish the "New Zealand Commerce and Industry Office" in Taipei until 1989.[15]

South Korea, which broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1992, has been represented by the "Korean Mission in Taipei" since 1993.[16] South Africa, which ended diplomatic ties in 1998, is represented by the "Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa".[17]

India, which has always had diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, established an "India–Taipei Association" in 1995, which is also authorised to provide consular and passport services.[18]

Singapore, despite close ties with Taiwan, did not establish formal diplomatic relations, although it was the last ASEAN country to establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, in 1990.[19] Consequently, it only established a "Trade Representative Office" in Taipei in 1979, renamed the "Singapore Trade Office in Taipei" in 1990.[20]

Taiwan missions in other countries

[edit]

Similarly, Taiwan maintains "representative offices" in other countries, which handle visa applications as well as relations with local authorities.[21] These establishments use the term "Taipei" instead of "Taiwan" or "Republic of China" since the term "Taipei" avoids implying that Taiwan is a separate country from China or that there are "Two Chinas", both of which would cause difficulties for their host countries.

Taipei Representative Office in the U.K. in London, United Kingdom, displaying the national emblem of the Republic of China

In 2007, for example, the Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dermot Ahern, confirmed that Ireland recognised the Government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China, and that while the Taipei Representative Office in Dublin had a representative function in relation to economic and cultural promotion, it had no diplomatic or political status.[22]

Before the 1990s, the names of these offices would vary considerably from country to country. For example, in the United States, Taipei's mission was known as the "Coordination Council for North American Affairs" (CCNAA),[23] in Japan as the "Association of East Asian Relations" (AEAR),[10] in the Philippines as the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center"[10] and in the United Kingdom as the "Free Chinese Centre".[24]

However, in May 1992, the AEAR offices in Japan became Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Offices,[25] as did the "Free Chinese Centre" in London.[26] In September 1994, the Clinton Administration announced that the CCNAA office in Washington could similarly be called the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office.[27]

Earlier in 1989, the "Pacific Economic and Cultural Center" in Manila became the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in the Philippines".[11] In 1991, the "Taiwan Marketing Service" office in Canberra, Australia, established in 1988, also became a "Taipei Economic and Cultural Office", along with the "Far East Trading Company" offices in Sydney and Melbourne.[28]

Other names are still used elsewhere; for example, Taiwan's mission in Moscow is formally known as the "Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission",[29] the mission in New Delhi is known as the "Taipei Economic and Cultural Center",[30] while the mission in Pretoria is known as the "Taipei Liaison Office".[31]

In Papua New Guinea and Fiji, the Taiwanese missions are known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea"[32] and "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the Republic of Fiji"[33] respectively, despite both countries having diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. The Taipei Representative Office in Singapore was similarly known as the "Trade Mission of the Republic of China" until 1990.[20]

In addition, Taiwan maintains "Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices" in Hong Kong and Macau, both Special Administrative Regions of the People's Republic of China. Previously, Taiwan was represented in Hong Kong by the "Chung Hwa Travel Service", established in 1966.[34] In Macau, it was represented by the "Taipei Trade and Tourism Office", established in 1989 and renamed the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" in 1999.[35] In May 2011, the "Chung Hwa Travel Service" was renamed the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Hong Kong, and in May 2012, the "Taipei Trade and Cultural Office" became the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Macau.[36]

Relations between Taiwan and China are conducted through two quasi-official organisations, the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) in Taipei, and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) in Beijing.[37] In 2012, the two organisations' chairmen, Lin Join-sane and Chen Yunlin announced talks on opening reciprocal representative offices, but did not commit to a timetable or reach an agreement.[38] In 2013, President Ma Ying-jeou outlined plans to establish three SEF representative offices in China, with the ARATS establishing representative offices in Taiwan.[39] The opposition Democratic Progressive Party expressed fears that China could use the offices as a channel for intelligence gathering in Taiwan, while China expressed concerns that they could be used as possible gathering areas for student demonstrators.[40]

Special administrative regions of the People's Republic of China

[edit]

Hong Kong

[edit]
Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices certified by the local government
  Countries hosting one or more offices
Bangkok office and covered countries
Berlin office and covered countries
Brussels office and covered countries
Jakarta office and covered countries
London office and covered countries
Singapore office and covered countries
Sydney office and covered countries

Due to Hong Kong's status as a Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices enjoy some privileges and immunities equivalent to those of a diplomatic mission under legislation passed by host countries such as the United Kingdom,[41] Canada[42] and Australia.[43] Under British administration, they were known as Hong Kong Government Offices, and were headed by a Commissioner.[44][45]

Similarly, foreign diplomatic missions there function independently of their embassies in Beijing, reporting directly to their foreign ministries.[46][47] For example, the United States Consulate General reports to the Department of State with the Consul General as the "Chief of Mission".[48]

When Hong Kong was under British administration, diplomatic missions of Commonwealth countries, such as Australia,[49] Bangladesh[50] Canada,[51] India,[52] Malaysia,[53] New Zealand[54] Nigeria[55] and Singapore[56] maintained Commissions. However, the Australian Commission was renamed the consulate-general in 1986.[57] Following the transfer of sovereignty to China in 1997, the remaining Commissions were renamed Consulates-General.[58] with the last commissioner becoming consul-general.[59]

Macau

[edit]

Macau, also a Special Administrative Region, similarly has the right to set up Macao Economic and Trade Offices around the world, which enjoy some privileges and immunities equivalent to those of a diplomatic mission under legislation passed by host countries such as Portugal, Belgium and others.

Office certified by the local government
  Countries hosting an office
  European Union, members not hosting an individual office

Disputed territories

[edit]

Northern Cyprus

[edit]

As the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, declared in 1983, is only recognised as an independent state by Turkey, it is represented in other countries by "Representative Offices", most notably in London, Washington, New York, Brussels, Islamabad, Abu Dhabi and Baku.[60]

West Germany and East Germany

[edit]

Prior to the reunification of Germany, West and East Germany were each represented by a "permanent mission" (Ständige Vertretung),[61] in East Berlin and Bonn respectively. These were headed by a "permanent representative", who served as a de facto ambassador.[62] The permanent missions were established under Article 8 of the Basic Treaty in 1972.[63]

On 2 October 1990, the last head of the West German Permanent Mission in East Germany, Franz Bertele, removes the shield from the office building following German reunification.

Previously, West Germany had always claimed to represent the whole of Germany, reflected in the Hallstein Doctrine, which prescribed that the Federal Republic would not establish or maintain diplomatic relations with any state that recognised the GDR.[64] Its opposition even extended to any country (such as India) allowing East Germany to open trade missions on their territory, which Bonn viewed as de facto recognition of the government in East Berlin.[65]

However, the GDR operated unofficial missions in Western countries, such as Britain, where "KfA Ltd", an agency of the Kammer für Außenhandel, or Department of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, was established in 1959.[66] By the early 1970s, this had begun to function as a de facto East German embassy in London, including diplomats on its staff.[67]

After 1973, West Germany no longer asserted an exclusive mandate over the whole of Germany, but still did not consider East Germany to be a "foreign" country. Instead of being conducted through the Foreign Office, relations were conducted through a separate Federal Ministry for Intra-German Relations, known until 1969 as the Federal Ministry of All-German Affairs.[68]

In contrast, East Germany did consider West Germany a completely separate country, meaning that while the East German mission in Bonn was accredited to the West German Chancellery, its West German counterpart in East Berlin was accredited to East Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.[69]

Rhodesia after UDI

[edit]

Following its Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) in 1965, Rhodesia maintained overseas missions in Lisbon and Lourenço Marques (now Maputo) until 1975[70] and an "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" in Pretoria.[71] The Rhodesian Information Office in Washington remained open, but its director, Ken Towsey, and his staff were deprived of their diplomatic status.[72] (Following the country's independence as Zimbabwe, Towsey became chargé d'affaires at the new embassy.)[73]

The flag of Rhodesia, adopted in 1968, was denounced as an illegal symbol when raised over Rhodesia House in London in 1969.[74]

The High Commission in London, known as Rhodesia House, continued to function until it was closed in 1969, following the decision by white Rhodesians in a referendum to make the country a republic. The British Residual Mission in Salisbury was closed at the same time.[75] Prior to its closure, the mission flew the newly adopted Flag of Rhodesia in a provocative gesture, as the Commonwealth Prime Ministers arrived in London for their Conference.[76] This was considered illegal by the Foreign Office, and prompted calls by Labour MP Willie Hamilton, who condemned it as "the flag of an illegal Government in rebellion against the Crown", for its removal.[74]

In Australia, the federal government sought to close the Rhodesia Information Centre in Sydney.[77] In 1973, the Labor government of Gough Whitlam cut post and telephone links to the centre, but this was ruled illegal by the High Court.[78] An office was also established in Paris, but was closed down by the French government in 1977.[79]

Similarly, the United States recalled its consul-general from Salisbury, and reduced consular staff,[80] but did not move to close its consulate until the declaration of a republic in 1970.[81] South Africa, however, retained its "Accredited Diplomatic Representative" after the UDI,[82] which allowed it to continue to recognise British sovereignty as well as to deal with the de facto authority of the government of Ian Smith.[83]

The self-styled "South African Diplomatic Mission" in Salisbury became the only such mission remaining in the country after 1975,[84] when Portugal downgraded its mission to consul level,[85] having recalled its consul-general from Salisbury in May 1970.[86]

Bophuthatswana

[edit]

Bophuthatswana, one of four nominally independent "homelands" created by South Africa under apartheid, was not recognised as an independent state by any other country.[87] Consequently, it only had diplomatic relations with Pretoria, which maintained an embassy in Mmabatho, its capital.[88] However, it established representative offices internationally, including in London[89] and Tel Aviv.[90]

"Bophuthatswana House" in Tel Aviv was the only place outside South Africa to fly the homeland's flag.[90]

The opening of "Bophuthatswana House" in Holland Park in London in 1982, attended by the homeland's president, Lucas Mangope, prompted demonstrations by the Anti-Apartheid Movement, and while the British government gave Mangope a special travel document to enter the United Kingdom, it refused to accord the mission diplomatic status.[91]

In 1985, a "Bophuthatswana House" was opened in Tel Aviv, in a building on HaYarkon Street next to the British Embassy.[92] Despite the objections of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the homeland's flag was flown from the building.[93]

Following the end of apartheid and the reincorporation of the homeland into South Africa, the Bophuthatswana government properties were acquired by the new South African government and sold.[94]

China in Hong Kong and Macau

[edit]

When Hong Kong was under British administration, China did not establish a consulate in what it considered to be part of its national territory.[95] However, the Communist government of the People's Republic of China in Beijing, and its predecessor, the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China in Nanking established de facto representation in the colony.

While the Nationalist government had negotiated with the British regarding the appointment of a Consul-General in Hong Kong in 1945, it decided against such an appointment, with its representative in the colony, T W Kwok (Kuo Teh-hua) instead being styled "Special Commissioner for Hong Kong".[96] This was in addition to his role as Nanking's Special Commissioner for Kwangtung and Kwangsi.[97] Disagreements also arose with the British authorities, with the Governor, Alexander Grantham, opposing an office building for the "Commissioner for Foreign Affairs of the Provinces of Kwangtung and Kuangsi" being erected on the site of the Walled City in Kowloon.[98] In 1950, following British recognition of the People's Republic of China, the office of the Special Commissioner was closed and Kwok withdrawn.[99]

In 1956, the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai requested the opening of a representative office in Hong Kong, but this also was opposed by Grantham, who advised the Secretary of State for the Colonies, Alan Lennox-Boyd in 1957 that it would a) give "an aura of respectability" to pro-Communist elements, b) have "a deplorable effect" on the morale of Chinese in Hong Kong, c) give the impression to friendly countries that Britain was retreating from the colony, d) that there would be no end to the claims of the Chinese representative as to what constituted his functions, and e) become a target for Kuomintang and other anti-communist activities.[100]

Consequently, the People's Republic of China was only represented unofficially in Hong Kong by the Xinhua News Agency Hong Kong Branch, which had been operating in the colony since 1945.[101] In addition to being a bona fide news agency, Xinhua also served as cover for the "underground" local branch of the Chinese Communist Party[102] known as the Hong Kong and Macau Work Committee (HKMWC).[103] It also opened additional district branches on Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and the New Territories in 1985 to expand its influence.[104]

Despite its unofficial status, the directors of the Xinhua Hong Kong Branch included high-ranking former diplomats such as Zhou Nan, former Ambassador to the United Nations and Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs, who later negotiated the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the future of Hong Kong.[105] His predecessor, Xu Jiatun, was also vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee, before fleeing to the United States in response to the military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests, where he went into exile.[106]

On 18 January 2000, after the transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong, the branch office of Xinhua became the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.[107]

When Macau was under Portuguese administration, the People's Republic of China was unofficially represented by the Nanguang trading company.[108] This later became known as China Central Enterprise Nam Kwong (Group).[109] Established in 1949, officially to promote trade ties between Macau and mainland China, it operated as the unofficial representative and "shadow government" of the People's Republic in relation to the Portuguese administration.[110]

It also served to challenge the rival "Special Commissariat of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of China" in the territory, which represented the Kuomintang government on Taiwan.[110] This was closed after the pro-Communist 12-3 incident in 1966, after which the Portuguese authorities agreed to ban all Kuomintang activities in Macau.[111] Following the Carnation Revolution, Portugal redefined Macau as a "Chinese territory under Portuguese administration" in 1976.[112] However, Lisbon did not establish diplomatic relations with Beijing until 1979.[113]

In 1984, Nam Kwong was split into political and trading arms.[114] On 21 September 1987, a Macau branch of Xinhua News Agency was established which, as in Hong Kong, became Beijing's unofficial representative, replacing Nam Kwong.[115] On 18 January 2000, a month after the transfer of sovereignty over Macau, the Macau branch became the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Macau Special Administrative Region.[116]

Regions

[edit]

Quebec

[edit]
The Quebec Government Office at 59 Pall Mall in London, England

The Quebec Government Offices (French: Délégations générales du Québec) are the Government of Quebec's official representations around the world. They are overseen by Quebec's Ministry of International Relations.

The network of 33 offices in 18 countries consists of eight general delegations, five delegations, thirteen government bureaux, five trade branches, and two areas of representation in multilateral affairs.

Kurdistan Region

[edit]

The Kurdistan regional Government in Iraq maintains representative offices in 13 countries and to the European Union.

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland

[edit]

The three devolved administrations in the United Kingdom each maintain their own network of representative offices for trade and cultural purposes. The Scottish Government maintains eight representative offices around the world, managed by the External Affairs Directorate.[117] The Welsh Government maintains 21 representative offices in twelve countries.[118] The Northern Ireland Executive maintains representative offices in Brussels, Beijing and Washington, D.C.[119]

Catalonia

[edit]
The Delegation of the Government of Catalonia in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Due to the further devolution of powers to the autonomous community of Catalonia in 2006, the right of the Government of Catalonia to establish delegations abroad in order to carry out its own non-diplomatic "foreign action" was recognized, while foreign affairs remained an exclusive matter of the Spanish Government. Currently, Catalonia's Ministry for Foreign Action and Europe maintains 17 delegations of the Government of Catalonia abroad, including one before the European Union.[120]

Montenegro (before 2006)

[edit]

Prior to achieving full independence in 2006, Montenegro effectively ran its own foreign policy independently of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, with a Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Podgorica and trade missions abroad operating as de facto embassies.[121]

Dependent territories

[edit]

Commonwealth of Nations

[edit]

Historically, in British colonies, independent Commonwealth countries were represented by Commissions, which functioned independently of their High Commissions in London. For example, Canada,[122] Australia[123] and New Zealand[124] maintained Commissions in Singapore, while following its independence in 1947, India established Commissions in Kenya,[125] Trinidad and Tobago,[126] and Mauritius[127] which became High Commissions on independence. Canada formerly had a Commissioner to Bermuda, although this post was held by the Consul-General to New York City,[128][129] but there is now an Honorary Canadian Consulate on the island.[130] Commissions of Commonwealth countries in the dependent territory of Hong Kong, such as those of Australia, Canada and Singapore, became consulates-general in name in 1997 but continues to report directly to the respective foreign ministries.

Southern Rhodesia

[edit]
Rhodesia House was the office of the colony's High Commissioner in London. (2006 photograph)

Southern Rhodesia, uniquely among British colonies, was represented in London by a High Commission from 1923, while the British government was represented by a High Commission in Salisbury from 1951.[131] Following the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in 1965, when the British High Commissioner was withdrawn[132] and the Rhodesian High Commissioner requested to leave London, both High Commissions were downgraded to residual missions before being closed down in 1970.[133]

The self-governing colony also established a High Commission in Pretoria, following the decision of the then Union of South Africa to establish one in Salisbury, which, after South Africa's withdrawal from the Commonwealth in 1961, was renamed the "South African Diplomatic Mission" with the High Commissioner becoming the "Accredited Diplomatic Representative".[131] Southern Rhodesia, which briefly became part of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, was also able to establish its own consulate in Lourenço Marques (now Maputo) in Mozambique.[134] In addition, it also had a "Minister for Rhodesian Affairs" in Washington, DC operating under the aegis of the British Embassy,[135] as well representatives in Tokyo and Bonn.[136]

During 1965, the government of Rhodesia, as the colony now called itself, made moves to establish a mission in Lisbon separate from the British Embassy, with its own accredited representative, prompting protests from the British government, which insisted that the representative, Harry Reedman, should be a nominal member of the British Ambassador's staff.[137] For their part, the Portuguese authorities sought a compromise whereby they would accept Reedman as an independent representative but deny him diplomatic status.[138]

Trade missions

[edit]

South Africa and neighbouring countries

[edit]

Under apartheid, South Africa maintained trade missions in neighbouring countries with which it did not have diplomatic relations, such as Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe),[139] where, following the country's independence, the "South African Diplomatic Mission" in Salisbury (now Harare) was closed.[140] A trade mission was also established in Maputo, Mozambique,[141] in 1984, nine years after the South African consulate was closed following independence in 1975.[142]

Similarly, Mauritius maintained a trade mission in Johannesburg, the country's commercial capital,[143] as did Zimbabwe, after the closure of its missions in Pretoria and Cape Town.[144]

Following majority rule in 1994, full diplomatic relations were established, and these became High Commissions, after South Africa rejoined the Commonwealth.[145]

South Korea and China

[edit]

Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, South Korea and the People's Republic of China established trade offices in Beijing and Seoul, under the auspices of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, and KOTRA, the Korea Trade Promotion Corporation respectively.[146] The South Korean office in Beijing was established in January 1991, while the Chinese office was established in April of that year.[147]

Other missions

[edit]

South Africa and China

[edit]

Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1998, South Africa and the People's Republic of China established "cultural centres" in Beijing and Pretoria, known as the South African Centre for Chinese Studies and the Chinese Centre for South African Studies respectively.[148] Although the Centres, each headed by a Director, did not use diplomatic titles, national flags, or coats of arms, their staff used diplomatic passports and were issued with diplomatic identity documents, while their vehicles had diplomatic number plates.[149] They also performed visa and consular services.[150]

Israel and China

[edit]

Prior to the establishment of full diplomatic relations in 1992, Israel and the People's Republic of China established representative offices in Beijing and Tel Aviv. The Israeli office was formally known as the Liaison Office of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.[151] This was opened in June 1990.[152] China was similarly represented by a branch of the China International Travel Service, which also opened in 1990.[153]

United States

[edit]

In the U.S., “diplomatic couriers” do “enjoy the privileges and immunities specified in the Vienna Convention,” as well as “their families,” and “the members of the mission,” even “the mission” itself; with respect to a nonparty to the Vienna Convention.[154]

Liaison offices

[edit]

Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

[edit]

Until 2019, Greece and the then Republic of Macedonia only maintained "Liaison Offices", with Greece being represented in Skopje by a mission known as the "Liaison Office of the Hellenic Republic",[155] and Macedonia by the "Liaison Office of the Republic of Macedonia" in Athens.[156] This was to the naming dispute between the two states, but following the Republic of Macedonia adoption of the name "North Macedonia" and the signing of an agreement with Greece, the two countries' diplomatic missions were upgraded to embassies, with Greece's representation in Bitola and North Macedonia's representation in Thessaloniki being upgraded to Consulates-General.[157]

Vietnam and the United States

[edit]

In January 1995, Vietnam and the United States established "Liaison Offices" in Washington and Hanoi, the first such diplomatic representation in the two countries since the end of the Vietnam War, when the US-backed South Vietnam fell to the Communist-controlled North.[158] On 11 July, President Bill Clinton announced the normalisation of relations between the two countries, and the following month, both countries upgraded their Liaison Offices to Embassy status, with the United States later opening a consulate general in Ho Chi Minh City and Vietnam opening a consulate in San Francisco, California.[159]

China and the United States

[edit]
Leonard Woodcock, last Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" and first Ambassador of the United States to the People's Republic of China

Following President Richard Nixon's visit to China, the United States and the People's Republic of China agreed to open "Liaison Offices" in Washington and Beijing in 1973, described by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger as "embassies in all but name".[160]

Although the Embassy of the Republic of China on Taiwan remained, it increasingly became overshadowed by the "Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China",[161] which, under Executive Order 11771, was accorded the same privileges and immunities enjoyed by the diplomatic missions accredited to the United States.[162]

George H. W. Bush, later vice-president under Ronald Reagan and President between 1989 and 1993, served as Chief of the "United States Liaison Office" in Beijing between 1974 and 1975.[163] The last holder of the post was Leonard Woodcock, formerly president of the United Auto Workers, who became the first Ambassador when full diplomatic relations were established in 1979.[164]

North Korea and South Korea

[edit]

The joint Inter-Korean Liaison Office was established as part of Panmunjom Declaration signed by North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in on April 27, 2018, during the 2018 inter-Korean Summit in Panmunjom. The joint liaison office provided direct communication channel for the two Koreas.[165] The office was blown up with explosives by the DPRK at 2:50 PM local time on 16 June 2020.[166]

North Korea and Japan

[edit]

There are no diplomatic relations between the North Korea and Japan. Chongryon functions as North Korea's de facto embassy in Japan.[167][168]

Kosovo and Serbia

[edit]

Under the terms of the Brussels Agreement signed in 2013, the governments of Serbia and Kosovo agreed to post liaison officers in each other's capitals.[169][170] The Government of Kosovo is represented in Serbia by the Liaison Office of Kosovo, Belgrade[171] and likewise the Government of Serbia is represented in Kosovo by the Liaison Office of Serbia, Pristina.[172] Under the terms of the EU proposed agreement that was accepted by both parties in March 2023, the liaison offices in each country are to be upgraded to Permanent Missions.[173][174]

Republic of Somaliland

[edit]

The Republic of Somaliland, which claims to be the legal successor to the short-lived State of Somaliland maintains a network of liaison offices around the world. Several states also maintain missions in Somaliland.

Interests sections

[edit]

When two nations break off diplomatic relations, their former embassies are usually turned over to third countries that act as protecting powers. The protecting power is responsible for all diplomatic communications on behalf of the protected power. When the situation improves, the feuding countries may be willing to accept diplomats from the other country on an unofficial basis. The original embassy is known as an "interests section" of the embassy of the protecting power. For example, until 2015, the Cuban Interests Section was staffed by Cubans and located in the old Cuban Embassy in Washington, but it was officially an interests section of the Swiss Embassy to the United States.[175]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ New Taiwan-U.S. diplomatic immunity pact a positive move: scholar Archived 24 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Focus Taiwan, 12 February 2013
  2. ^ Former Polish Director of U.S. Interests Section in Baghdad Krzysztof Bernacki Receives the Secretary's Award for Distinguished Service Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Department of State, 28 February 2003
  3. ^ De facto embassies in Taipei folding the flag, Asia Times, 14 June 2011
  4. ^ a b Privatising the State Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Béatrice Hibou, C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 2004, pages 157–158
  5. ^ "La France à Taiwan". Archived from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 30 January 2016.
  6. ^ "British Office". Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 29 January 2016.
  7. ^ "German Institute Taipei". Archived from the original on 18 March 2020. Retrieved 19 January 2020.
  8. ^ Chang, Mao-sen (29 December 2016). "Foreign ministry supports name change". Taipei Times. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 29 December 2016.
  9. ^ The International Energy Relations of China Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Kim Woodard Stanford University Press, 1980, page 125
  10. ^ a b c International Law of Recognition and the Status of the Republic of China Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Hungdah Chiu, in The United States and the Republic of China: Democratic Friends, Strategic Allies, and Economic Partners, Steven W. Mosher Transaction Publishers, 1992, page 24
  11. ^ a b Ensuring Interests: Dynamics of China-Taiwan Relations and Southeast Asia Archived 2 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Khai Leong Ho, Guozhong He, Institute of China Studies, University of Malaya, 2006, page 25
  12. ^ The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate: 1962–1983, Ann Millar, UNSW Press, 2000, page 244
  13. ^ Prospects for Australian Seafood Exports: A Case Study of the Taiwanese Market Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Malcolm Tull Asia Research Centre on Social, Political, and Economic Change, Murdoch University, 1993, page 10
  14. ^ Australian office renamed Archived 8 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Times, 30 May 2012
  15. ^ Republic of China Yearbook Taiwan Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1989, page 227
  16. ^ Seoul tries to mend Taipei tie Archived 7 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Taiwan Today, 8 November 1996
  17. ^ "Liaison Office of the Republic of South Africa". Archived from the original on 19 April 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  18. ^ "About Us – India-Taipei Association". Archived from the original on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 4 February 2016.
  19. ^ Contemporary Southeast Asia Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volumes 7–8, Singapore University Press, 1985, page 215
  20. ^ a b American Journal of Chinese Studies Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volumes 3–4, American Association for Chinese Studies, 1996, page 170
  21. ^ Visa Requirements for the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan Archived 8 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Representative Office in the U.K., 1 July 2011
  22. ^ Written Answers – Diplomatic Relations. Archived 24 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine Thursday, 8 February 2007 Dáil Éireann (Ref No: 3911/07)
  23. ^ Memorandum of Understanding between the American Institute in Taiwan and the Coordination Council for North American Affairs on the Exchange of Information Concerning Commodity Futures and Options Matters Archived 21 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Signed at Arlington, Virginia this 11th day of January 1993
  24. ^ The Cold War's Odd Couple: The Unintended Partnership Between the Republic of China and the UK, 1950–1958 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Steven Tsang, I.B.Tauris, 2006, page 39
  25. ^ Republic of China Yearbook Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine Kwang Hwa Publishing Company, 1998, 145
  26. ^ Former diplomats to Great Britain remember Thatcher, The China Post, 10 April 2013
  27. ^ Taiwan's Relations with Mainland China: A Tail Wagging Two Dogs Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Chi Su Routledge, 2008, page 31
  28. ^ Australia and China: Partners in Asia Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Colin Mackerras, Macmillan Education, 1996, page 33
  29. ^ "Representative Office in Moscow for the Taipei–Moscow Economic and Cultural Coordination Commission". Archived from the original on 22 August 2017. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
  30. ^ MoU between India-Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in India on cooperation in the field of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Archived 5 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Cabinet, 14 October 2015
  31. ^ "Taipei Liaison Office in the RSA". Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  32. ^ "Trade Mission of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in Papua New Guinea". Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  33. ^ "Trade Mission of the Republic of China to the Republic of Fiji". Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  34. ^ Is name change a game changer? Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Times, 17 July 2011
  35. ^ Macao allows Taipei office to issue visas to Chinese Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Times, 7 January 2002
  36. ^ Macau representative office in Taiwan opens Archived 5 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine The China Post, 14 May 2012
  37. ^ Human rights as identities: difference and discrimination in Taiwan's China policy Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Shih Chih-Yu in Debating Human Rights: Critical Essays from the United States and Asia, Peter Van Ness (ed.), Routledge, 2003, page 153
  38. ^ SEF, ARATS push for reciprocal rep offices Archived 2 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Taiwan Today, 17 October 2012
  39. ^ Ma defends cross-strait offices proposal Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Times, 24 April 2013
  40. ^ PRC has qualms over representative offices: Ma Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine The China Post, 19 May 2015
  41. ^ "The Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Act 1996". Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
  42. ^ Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Privileges and Immunities Order
  43. ^ "Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 1996". Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
  44. ^ Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office Bill Archived 24 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Hansard, 25 November 1996
  45. ^ LETTER: Hong Kong's road to democracy Archived 26 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent, 23 August 1995
  46. ^ "Christopher J. Marut Appointed as Director of the Taipei Office of the American Institute in Taiwan" (Press release). American Institute in Taiwan. 8 May 2012. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
  47. ^ "Inspection of The Canadian Consulate General Hong Kong". Archived from the original on 24 December 2014. Retrieved 10 January 2014.
  48. ^ "Chiefs of Mission". U.S. Department of State. 8 September 2004. Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 25 May 2019.
  49. ^ Australian Commission Office Requirements Archived 6 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Sydney Morning Herald, 18 August 1982
  50. ^ Business Directory of Hong Kong Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Current Publications Company, 1988, page 797
  51. ^ 2 China Dissidents Granted Asylum, Fly to Vancouver, Los Angeles Times, 17 September 1992
  52. ^ Indians in Limbo as 1997 Hand-over Date Draws Nearer Archived 26 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Inter Press Service, 12 February 1996
  53. ^ Officials puzzled by Malaysian decision Archived 14 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, New Straits Times, 3 July 1984
  54. ^ NZer's credibility under fire in Hong Kong court Archived 5 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine, New Zealand Herald, 27 March 2006
  55. ^ Asia, Inc: The Region's Business Magazine Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volume 4, Manager International Company, 1996
  56. ^ Singapore Lure Stirs Crowds In Hong Kong, Chicago Tribune, 12 July 1989
  57. ^ Australian Foreign Affairs Record Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volume 56, Issues 7-12, Australian Government Public Service, 1985, page 1153
  58. ^ "About the Consulate-General". Archived from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2015.
  59. ^ In the swing of things Archived 23 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Embassy Magazine, September 2010
  60. ^ The Making of Informal States: Statebuilding in Northern Cyprus and Transdniestria Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Daria Isachenko, Palgrave Macmillan, page 163
  61. ^ "History of the Berlin Wall". 2 May 1974. Archived from the original on 21 August 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
  62. ^ East-West German trade up 8 percent Archived 24 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine The Christian Science Monitor, 8 September 1982
  63. ^ Uniting Germany: Documents and Debates, 1944–1993 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volker Gransow, Konrad Hugo Jarausch, Berghahn Books, page 23
  64. ^ The Two Germanies: Rivals struggle for Germany's soul – As worries surface in Bonn about the influx from the East, there are anxieties across Europe about the likely economic and international effects Archived 25 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 15 September 1989
  65. ^ Germany's Cold War: The Global Campaign to Isolate East Germany, 1949–1969 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, University of North Carolina Press, 2003, page 26
  66. ^ Uneasy Allies : British–German Relations and European Integration Since 1945 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Klaus Larres, Elizabeth Meehan, OUP Oxford, 2000, page 76–77
  67. ^ Friendly Enemies: Britain and the GDR, 1949–1990 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Stefan Berger, Norman LaPorte, Berghahn Books, 2010, page 13
  68. ^ German Politics Today Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine Geoffrey K. Roberts, Manchester University Press, 2000, page 46
  69. ^ Germany Divided: From the Wall to Reunification Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, A. James McAdams Princeton University Press, 1994, page 107
  70. ^ Rhodesians to quit Lisbon Archived 27 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Glasgow Herald, 1 May 1975, page 4
  71. ^ Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 52
  72. ^ Goldberg Back British Stand In U.N. Session Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine,Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 13 November 1965
  73. ^ Rhodesia's Lobbyist Back for Mugabe Archived 6 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, 26 June 1980
  74. ^ a b M.P. calls for removal of Rhodesian flag in Strand Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Glasgow Herald, 4 January 1969, page 1
  75. ^ Rhodesia Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Hansard, HC Deb 24 June 1969 vol 785 cc1218-27
  76. ^ SMITH SHOWS THE FLAG Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press Archive, 6 January 1969
  77. ^ Rhodesia Office Will Be Closed Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Age, 3 April 1972
  78. ^ Africa Contemporary Record: Annual Survey and Documents, Volume 6 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Colin Legum, Africana Publishing Company, 1974
  79. ^ US Not Closing Rhodesian Office Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Lewiston Daily Sun, 27 August 1977, page 8
  80. ^ US To Restrict Sales To Rhodesia Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Reading Eagle, 12 December 1965
  81. ^ The Superpowers and Africa: The Constraints of a Rivalry, 1960–1990 Archived 8 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Zaki Laïdi University of Chicago Press, 1990, page 55
  82. ^ Foreign Affairs for New States: Some Questions of Credentials Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Peter John Boyce, University of Queensland Press, January 1977, page 13
  83. ^ Confrontation and Accommodation in Southern Africa: The Limits of Independence Archived 5 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Kenneth W. Grundy, University of California Press, 1973, page 257
  84. ^ Native Vs. Settler: Ethnic Conflict in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland, and South Africa Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Thomas G. Mitchell Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000, page 141
  85. ^ Sanctions: The Case of Rhodesia Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Harry R. Strack, Syracuse University Press, 1978, page 77
  86. ^ Portugal Severs Key Link With Rhodesia Archived 8 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 27 April 1970
  87. ^ Bophuthatswana, HC Deb Archived 6 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Hansard, 19 October 1988 vol 138 cc872-3
  88. ^ South Africa Suppresses Coup In Homeland Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Chicago Tribune, 11 February 1988
  89. ^ Toytown image hid apartheid tyranny: As white right-wingers die at the hands of Bophuthatswana forces, Richard Dowden examines the racial purpose of the 'homeland' Archived 3 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent, 12 March 1994
  90. ^ a b Apartheid's "Little Israel" Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Arianna Lissoni, in Apartheid Israel: The Politics of an Analogy, Sean Jacobs, Jon Soske, Haymarket Books, 2015
  91. ^ 'Bophuthatswana House' protest Archived 4 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Anti-Apartheid Movement Archive
  92. ^ Foreign Ministry opposed to Bophuthatswana office in Israel Archived 10 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, 5 June 1985
  93. ^ The Unspoken Alliance: Israel's Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, Pantheon Books, New York, 2010, page 157.
  94. ^ Inside File: A des. res. in Trafalgar Square, one proud owner Archived 5 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine, The Independent, 11 May 1994
  95. ^ The Long History of United Front Activity in Hong Kong Archived 29 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Hong Kong Journal, Cindy Yik-yi Chu, July 2011
  96. ^ Democracy shelved: Great Britain, China, and attempts at constitutional reform in Hong Kong, 1945–1952 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Steve Yui-Sang Tsang, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1988, page 28
  97. ^ Hegemonies Compared: State Formation and Chinese School Politics in Postwar Singapore and Hong Kong Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Ting-Hong Wong, Routledge Press, 2002, page 96
  98. ^ Britain and China 1945–1950: Documents on British Policy Overseas, Series I, Volume 8 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, S.R. Ashton, G. Bennett, K. Hamilton, Routledge, 2013 page 129
  99. ^ Via Ports: From Hong Kong to Hong Kong Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Alexander Grantham, Hong Kong University Press, 2012, page 106
  100. ^ Government and Politics Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Steve Tsang, Hong Kong University Press, 1995, pages 276
  101. ^ Hong Kong: China's Challenge Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Michael B. Yahuda Psychology Press, 1996, pages 46–47
  102. ^ China's Political Economy Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Wang Gungwu, John Wong World Scientific, 1998, page 360
  103. ^ Elections and Democracy in Greater China, Larry Diamond, Ramon H. Myers, OUP Oxford, 2001, page 228
  104. ^ Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral Democracy Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Brian Bridges, Lok-sang Ho, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, page 155
  105. ^ 'Poet diplomat' Zhou Nan takes aim at Occupy Central Archived 22 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, South China Morning Post, 16 June 2014
  106. ^ China's ex-proxy in Hong Kong fired for 'betrayal' Archived 10 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine, UPI, 22 February 1991
  107. ^ In Watching Hong Kong, China Loses The Shades Archived 24 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, 20 February 2000
  108. ^ Portuguese behavior towards the political transition and the regional integration of Macau in the Pearl River Region Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Moisés Silva Fernandes, in Macau and Its Neighbours in Transition, Rufino Ramos, José Rocha Dinis, D.Y.Yuan, Rex Wilson, University of Macau, Macau Foundation, 1997, page 48
  109. ^ NAM KWONG (GROUP) COMPANY LIMITED Archived 4 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, China Daily, 22 September 1988
  110. ^ a b Macao in Sino-Portuguese Relations Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Moisés Silva Fernandes, in Portuguese Studies Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, page 155
  111. ^ Macao Locals Favor Portuguese Rule Archived 1 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Sam Cohen, The Observer in Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 2 June 1974, page 4H
  112. ^ Lisbon Seen in 1999 Macao Shift, The New York Times, 8 January 1987
  113. ^ Sino-Portugal relations, Xinhua 24 August 2004
  114. ^ Naked Tropics: Essays on Empire and Other Rogues Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Kenneth Maxwell, Psychology Press, 2003, page 280
  115. ^ Asia Yearbook Archived 7 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Far Eastern Economic Review, 1988
  116. ^ Renamed Xinhua becomes a new force in Hong Kong's politics Archived 19 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Taipei Times, 21 January 2000
  117. ^ "International relations". Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  118. ^ "International offices". 6 November 2018. Archived from the original on 19 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  119. ^ "Promoting Northern Ireland". 29 May 2015. Archived from the original on 30 June 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  120. ^ "Delegations of the Generalitat abroad". exteriors.gencat.cat. Archived from the original on 30 November 2022. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  121. ^ Montenegro and Serbia: disassociation, negotiation, resolution? Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Philip Lyon in De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty Tozun Bahcheli, Barry Bartmann, Henry Srebrnik, Routledge, 2004, page 60
  122. ^ Colonial Reports Report on Sarawak Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Great Britain, Colonial Office 1961, page 7
  123. ^ Losing the Blanket: Australia and the End of Britain's Empire Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, David Goldsworthy Melbourne University Publish, 2002, page 28
  124. ^ External Affairs Review, Volume 6 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, New Zealand. Dept. of External Affairs 1956, page 41
  125. ^ Indian Coffee: Bulletin of the Indian Coffee Board, Volume 21 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Coffee Board, 1957, page 202
  126. ^ Caribbean Studies, Volume 16 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Institute of Caribbean Studies, University of Puerto Rico, 1977, page 22
  127. ^ The Establishment and Cultivation of Modern Standard Hindi in Mauritius Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Lutchmee Parsad Ramyead, Mahatma Gandhi Institute, 1985, page 86
  128. ^ The Canadian Commission to Bermuda Archived 27 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  129. ^ "Canada's One-Time Bermuda Diplomat Dies". 23 November 2011. Archived from the original on 27 November 2011. Retrieved 28 January 2016.
  130. ^ "Embassies and consulates - Bermuda". 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 13 June 2017. Retrieved 15 July 2017.
  131. ^ a b Diplomacy with a Difference: the Commonwealth Office of High Commissioner, 1880–2006 Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Lorna Lloyd, BRILL, 2007, page 240
  132. ^ Sir John Johnston Archived 27 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine, The Daily Telegraph, 25 October 2005
  133. ^ The United Nations, international law, and the Rhodesian independence crisis Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Jericho Nkala, Clarendon Press, 1985, page 76
  134. ^ John Arthur KINSEY, Esq., Consul-General for the Federation at Lourenco Marques Archived 15 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, London Gazette, 5 June 1959
  135. ^ Isolated States: A Comparative Analysis Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Deon Geldenhuys, Cambridge University Press, 1990, page 62
  136. ^ Collective Responses to Illegal Acts in International Law: United Nations Action in the Question of Southern Rhodesia Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Vera Gowlland-Debbas, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 1990
  137. ^ Rhodesia's Man in Lisbon: Objective Said To Be Achieved Archived 7 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Glasgow Herald, 22 September 1965. page 9
  138. ^ International Diplomacy and Colonial Retreat Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Kent Fedorowich, Martin Thomas Routledge, 2013, page 186
  139. ^ Thousands Rampage Through Harare, Upset Over Machel's Death Archived 19 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, 21 October 1986
  140. ^ Salisbury whites queue up to flee Archived 7 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Age, 8 July 1980
  141. ^ Youths Attack South African Trade Mission, United Press International, 5 November 1986
  142. ^ South Africa, 1987–1988 Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Department of Foreign Affairs, page 207
  143. ^ Port Louis Journal; Land of Apartheid Befriends an Indian Ocean Isle Archived 8 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, 28 December 1987
  144. ^ Coming To Terms: Zimbabwe in the International Arena Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Richard Schwartz I.B.Tauris, 2001, page 68
  145. ^ Portfolio of South Africa Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Portfolio Publications, 1999
  146. ^ S. Korea, China Agree to Set Up Trade Offices : Asia: The diplomatic accord is another setback for Communist North Korea, an ally of Beijing., Los Angeles Times, 21 October 1990
  147. ^ China and South Korea in a New Triangle Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Emerging Patterns of East Asian Investment in China: From Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, Sumner J. La Croix M.E. Sharpe, 1995, page 215
  148. ^ Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy: The Micro-macro Linkage Approach Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Quansheng Zhao Oxford University Press, 1996, page 68
  149. ^ Establishing the SA Mission in the PRC Archived 24 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Embassy of the People's Republic of China, 31 March 2008
  150. ^ Colour, Confusion and Concessions: The History of the Chinese in South Africa Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Hong Kong University Press, 1996, page 424
  151. ^ A China Diary: Towards the Establishment of China-Israel Diplomatic Relations Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, E. Zev Sufott, Frank Cass, 1997, page ix
  152. ^ Israel Strengthening Representation in China Archived 17 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Associated Press, 9 January 1991
  153. ^ IDSA News Review on East Asia Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Volume 5, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, 1991, page 375
  154. ^ "22 U.S. Code § 254b - Privileges and immunities of mission of nonparty to Vienna Convention". Archived from the original on 27 November 2022. Retrieved 27 November 2022.
  155. ^ F.Y.R.O.M. – Greece's Bilateral Relations Archived 1 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greece
  156. ^ Interview for IBNA of Darko Angelov, Head of the liaison office of Republic of Macedonia in Athens Archived 4 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Macedonia, 29 October 2015
  157. ^ Greece, North Macedonia open embassies after name deal Archived 11 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine, AP, May 31, 2019
  158. ^ U.S., Vietnam to Establish Liaison Offices Archived 6 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post, Thomas W. Lippman 28 January 1995
  159. ^ Political Risk Yearbook: East Asia & the Pacific Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, PRS Group, 2008, page 27
  160. ^ A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency Archived 30 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine, William P. Bundy, I.B.Tauris, 1998, page 402
  161. ^ Chiang Ching-kuo's Leadership in the Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan Archived 11 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine, Shao Chuan Leng, University Press of America, 1993, page 137
  162. ^ Executive Order 11771 – Extending Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities to the Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China in Washington, DC and to Members Thereof Archived 14 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine, RICHARD NIXON, The White House, 18 March 1974
  163. ^ The China Diary of George H. W. Bush: The Making of a Global President Archived 11 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Jeffrey A. Engel, Princeton University Press, 2008
  164. ^ Leonard Woodcock; President of United Auto Workers Union, Envoy to China, Los Angeles Times, 18 January 2001
  165. ^ North and South Korea Open Full-Time Liaison Office at Border Archived 25 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, September 14, 2018
  166. ^ "Alert: South Korea says North Korea blew up an inter-Korean liaison office amid rising tensions between the rivals". SFChronicle.com. 16 June 2020. Archived from the original on 17 June 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
  167. ^ John Pike. "Chosen Soren". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 7 October 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2010.
  168. ^ "Stage set for Japan to seize North Korea's 'embassy' Archived October 2, 2008, at the Wayback Machine." Agence France-Presse. June 18, 2007. Retrieved on January 15, 2009.
  169. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2023. Retrieved 11 April 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  170. ^ "Serbia and Kosovo Begin Direct Liaisons". 17 June 2013. Archived from the original on 23 February 2023. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
  171. ^ "Beograd - Ambasadat e Republikës së Kosovës". 25 January 2022. Archived from the original on 23 February 2023. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
  172. ^ "Belgrade's liaison officer sent a request to Pristina to visit Dejan Pantic - Kosovo Online". Archived from the original on 19 December 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
  173. ^ "Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: EU Proposal - Agreement on the path to normalisation between Kosovo and Serbia | EEAS Website". www.eeas.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023. Retrieved 21 March 2023.
  174. ^ "Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: Implementation Annex to the Agreement on the Path to Normalisation of Relations between Kosovo and Serbia | EEAS Website". www.eeas.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 21 March 2023.
  175. ^ Krauss, Clifford (12 February 1991). "Swiss to Sponsor Cuba's Diplomats". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2018.