Talk:Osama bin Laden: Difference between revisions
→“Islamic” dissident: Reply |
Squeakachu (talk | contribs) →Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2024: Marked the edit request as completed (Edit Request Tool) |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} |
{{Skip to talk}} |
||
{{Talk header|bottom=yes}} |
{{Talk header|bottom=yes}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=Low}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{Controversial}} |
{{Controversial}} |
||
{{Notice|image=Stop hand nuvola.svg|1='''STOP!''' Are you here about the date of death given? Please look at the '''Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)''' tab marked by the large question mark right beneath this message.}} |
{{Notice|image=Stop hand nuvola.svg|1='''STOP!''' Are you here about the date of death given? Please look at the '''Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)''' tab marked by the large question mark right beneath this message.}} |
||
Line 56: | Line 43: | ||
|topic=History |
|topic=History |
||
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|currentstatus=FGAN |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
|target=Talk:Osama bin Laden/Archive index |
|target=Talk:Osama bin Laden/Archive index |
||
|mask=Talk:Osama bin Laden/Archive <#> |
|mask=Talk:Osama bin Laden/Archive <#> |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
{{talkquote|`Azzam> ’s role during the Soviet–Afghan war period had tremendous contributions to the current state of national and international security, and can be described thus: 1. A jihad advocate who raised jihad awareness among Muslims all over the world and rallied them to participate and support jihad in Afghanistan. 2. A commander for foreign volunteers in Afghanistan, training them for jihad and deploying them to various fronts. 3. An ideologue who constructed jihad ideology to mobilise Muslims and indoctrinate fighters. 4. The founder of Maktab Al-Khidmat> which, whether intended or not, later transformed into Al-Qaeda. 5. A mentor to Bin Laden who went on to become the leader of Al-Qaeda, the leading jihadist organisation today.}} |
{{talkquote|`Azzam> ’s role during the Soviet–Afghan war period had tremendous contributions to the current state of national and international security, and can be described thus: 1. A jihad advocate who raised jihad awareness among Muslims all over the world and rallied them to participate and support jihad in Afghanistan. 2. A commander for foreign volunteers in Afghanistan, training them for jihad and deploying them to various fronts. 3. An ideologue who constructed jihad ideology to mobilise Muslims and indoctrinate fighters. 4. The founder of Maktab Al-Khidmat> which, whether intended or not, later transformed into Al-Qaeda. 5. A mentor to Bin Laden who went on to become the leader of Al-Qaeda, the leading jihadist organisation today.}} |
||
== Osama bin Ladens killing faked? == |
|||
== Reference a source for this sweeping claim in the Introduction == |
|||
"Bin Laden grew to become a highly influential ideologue in the Islamic world." |
|||
According to who? Osama bin Laden is reviled in the Islamic world and is barely given a mention in any scholarly circle. Please add a credible source for this statement. [[User:Avahoneybrown|Avahoneybrown]] ([[User talk:Avahoneybrown|talk]]) 06:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I re-worded the sentence in line with the citations in the body of the page. [[User:Shadowwarrior8|Shadowwarrior8]] ([[User talk:Shadowwarrior8|talk]]) 21:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
In the Section "Letter to the American People" the last sentence states that "TikTok began taking down videos that shared the letter." This is not accurate to any of the 5 references cited with that sentence. I have not found any official sources confirming this claim. |
|||
There is a few contradictions with the story of the revenge killing of Osama bin Laden. Major point being the legal system in the United States which has practice of giving out life sentences of 100+ years. Every foreign person shakes their head at this because very few people have a life over 120 years. Similarily fly/lure fishing is a common practice in the fishing sport of America. The practice of throwing or releasing fish back into the pond or water is common when the fish is not of certain size/weight. So in conclusion, people are asking why the US Navy aircraft carrier that took DNA samples from the carcass of Osama bin Laden threw him back into the Indian Ocean, instead of taking his remains to the US, for 100+ years of incarceration past death. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.180.127.141|87.180.127.141]] ([[User talk:87.180.127.141#top|talk]]) 17:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Please change "The letter was removed from The Guardian website after more than 20 years of being present online in the news outlet's webpage and TikTok began taking down videos that shared the letter." to The letter was removed from The Guardian website after more than 20 years of being present online in the news outlet's webpage." [[Special:Contributions/2603:6081:C640:5E5:7D26:8FB2:F459:2D18|2603:6081:C640:5E5:7D26:8FB2:F459:2D18]] ([[User talk:2603:6081:C640:5E5:7D26:8FB2:F459:2D18|talk]]) 01:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Why does "Osama" redirect to this page? == |
|||
:{{done|Problem resolved|I have found and added a reference}} [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 01:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
It's a fairly common given name. [[Special:Contributions/2604:3D09:1785:9000:D178:A395:9F80:1C88|2604:3D09:1785:9000:D178:A395:9F80:1C88]] ([[User talk:2604:3D09:1785:9000:D178:A395:9F80:1C88|talk]]) 11:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== “Islamic” dissident == |
|||
:Good point. This encyclopedia has [[Osama_(name)|dozens of articles]] about various "Osamas", and searches for it should clearly go to the disambiguation page at [[Osama (disambiguation)]]... I have made that change. [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 11:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Your edit resulted in a [[WP:MALPLACED]] disambiguation page. If you think there is no primary topic for [[Osama]], please propose [[WP:RM|moving]] [[Osama (disambiguation)]] to the base name. [[User:Bkonrad|older]] ≠ [[User talk:Bkonrad|wiser]] 12:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Just to be clear, I don't "think there is no primary topic for [[Osama]]" per se. I, along with the IP, think re-directing "Osama" here is unencylopedic. [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 18:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Why is that unencyclopedic? And, if you don't think there is a primary topic, then the disambiguation page should be at the base name. Do not simply change the redirect target. [[User:Bkonrad|older]] ≠ [[User talk:Bkonrad|wiser]] 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::It's unencyclopedic because readers wanting to know about one of the dozens of other uses of "Osama", and who enter that term explicitly in the search box, should not have to be presented with the article of a terrorist to get there first. That such a search should go to the disambiguation page seems obvious to me.[[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 19:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::That's an opinion; but as with many other such names where one person is very strongly associated with the name, Wikipedia has for a very long time agreed that the name can redirect to such persons who are singularly extremely well-known by the name. [[User:Bkonrad|older]] ≠ [[User talk:Bkonrad|wiser]] 19:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Forcing every user who wants to know about the historic aspects of a subject, to first read the article about whatever it is which is the most popular search is of course, the operative modus here, but I will continue to defend old-school encyclopedic style, which would in no way require someone interested in the history of "Osama" to first be presented with the article of a terrorist, but that is, as you point out, simply my opinion, and I've made my case and I'm done re-iterating it. [[User:Marcus Markup|Marcus Markup]] ([[User talk:Marcus Markup|talk]]) 20:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::This isn't like "Hitler". Osama is a very common name. In the US, everyone thinks of Bin Laden, but in countries where it's a common given name, that's not the case. [[Osama (disambiguation)]] should be moved to [[Osama]]. <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>[[User:Zanahary|Zanahary]]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 02:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Support moving the dab-page, per Zanahary. [[User:Draken Bowser|Draken Bowser]] ([[User talk:Draken Bowser|talk]]) 14:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::Anyone can start a [[WP:RM|requested move]] discussion at the relevant talk page [[Talk:Osama (disambiguation)]]. Note that because of the history, this would not qualify as an uncontroversial technical move. [[User:Bkonrad|older]] ≠ [[User talk:Bkonrad|wiser]] 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::::I have started it [[Talk:Osama_(disambiguation)#Requested_move_21_October_2024|here]]. <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>[[User:Zanahary|Zanahary]]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 15:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Move discussion in progress == |
|||
:I shall change the wording to "Islamist dissident" in the lead sentence. [[User:Shadowwarrior8|Shadowwarrior8]] ([[User talk:Shadowwarrior8|talk]]) 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Surely it should also say terrorist. I get that that term is sometimes subjective, but it’s fairly objective here. [[User:Alexanderkowal|Alexanderkowal]] ([[User talk:Alexanderkowal|talk]]) 07:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::I’d rather not, per [[MOS:TERRORIST]] [[User:Yr Enw|Yr Enw]] ([[User talk:Yr Enw|talk]]) 09:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Is he not widely referred to as a terrorist in global media, not just American? Even Gaddafi called him a terrorist. [[User:Alexanderkowal|Alexanderkowal]] ([[User talk:Alexanderkowal|talk]]) 09:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::You’ve probably got a good case for it, and if other editors agree, then that trumps my own personal opinion (I am against using the word in editorial voice at all), so it’s up to you if you want to try to get consensus on it. [[User:Yr Enw|Yr Enw]] ([[User talk:Yr Enw|talk]]) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::It’s more about reflecting a wide array of sources and if the bbc doesn’t label him a terrorist, considering it’s usually quite western centric in its foreign reporting, I don’t think there’s much of a case for it. I suppose we could look at academic sources [[User:Alexanderkowal|Alexanderkowal]] ([[User talk:Alexanderkowal|talk]]) 13:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::The classical definition of the word “terrorism” is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims”. If he does not qualify, who does? I believe he should at the very least have this word referenced in the opening sentence. “An Islamist dissident… who financed, oversaw, and committed acts of terrorism”. Without that word, it feels like whitewashing what he is widely known to have done and been. [[User:C33msies|C33msies]] ([[User talk:C33msies|talk]]) 03:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::To be fair, the BBC's obituary for him doesn't call him a terrorist. [[User:Alexanderkowal|Alexanderkowal]] ([[User talk:Alexanderkowal|talk]]) 09:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::BBC is a Left Wing Islamist Source, ofcourse it doesn't. [[Special:Contributions/2405:201:C05C:830:F4E0:11B0:BC6A:47AD|2405:201:C05C:830:F4E0:11B0:BC6A:47AD]] ([[User talk:2405:201:C05C:830:F4E0:11B0:BC6A:47AD|talk]]) 13:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::You’re [[WP:NOTHERE]], get off Facebook and talk to people [[User:Alexanderkowal|Alexanderkowal]] ([[User talk:Alexanderkowal|talk]]) 14:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Osama (disambiguation)#Requested move 21 October 2024|Talk:Osama (disambiguation)]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Osama (disambiguation)#Requested move 21 October 2024 crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 15:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Change the DOA date == |
|||
⚫ | |||
It was may 1 2011 when his death was announced, not may 2nd as labeled. Use this video as reference, it was just after midnight during the announcement but the DOD was in-fact on 05/01/2011 |
|||
[[:File:President Obama on Death of Osama bin Laden.ogv]] [[User:Zlanning|Zlanning]] ([[User talk:Zlanning|talk]]) 03:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
:[https://apnews.com/article/today-in-history-may-1-866bafd8168fdc56d8c43978e1348f91#:~:text=On%20May%201%2C%202011%2C%20President,Qaida%20leader%20met%20his%20end.) Corroborated by AP] <span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧁</span>[[User:Zanahary|Zanahary]]<span style="position: relative; top: -0.5em;">꧂</span> 07:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Change "War in Terror" in the Reception and legacy section, to "War on Terror" [[User:Bflemingdc|Bflemingdc]] ([[User talk:Bflemingdc|talk]]) 17:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Squeakachu|Squeakachu]] ([[User talk:Squeakachu|talk]]) 17:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:59, 27 October 2024
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Osama bin Laden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
STOP! Are you here about the date of death given? Please look at the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) tab marked by the large question mark right beneath this message. |
Q1: Why is the article reluctant to call him a terrorist?
A1: Wikipedia has a guideline discouraging the use of words such as "terrorist", especially if it is improperly sourced. This is not an indication of condoning "terrorist" activities, but of neutrality, and avoidance of passing judgment, affirming, or denying. A consensus was reached on this talk page that bin Laden could be described as being on the FBI's list of Most Wanted Terrorists, and a target in the War on Terror. Please debate the merit of the guideline at Wikipedia talk:Words to avoid, not here. Q2: Why does the article say he died on May 2, 2011?
A2: Independent verification affirms that a raid took place on the compound where bin Laden was killed in the early hours of the morning of May 2, Pakistan Standard Time. Per the Manual of Style, we describe his death as taking place on May 2, even though U.S. President Barack Obama made his announcement in the evening of May 1, Eastern Daylight Time. Pakistan is 5 hours ahead of GMT/UTC. I.e. midnight of May 1 on the east coast of North America is 10 a.m. on May 2 in Pakistan. |
Osama bin Laden was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2011. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Azzam's relationship with Bin Laden
[edit]Azzam's influence on Laden is lede-worthy. These are some academic sources describing a decade-long relationship between Azzam and Laden and Azzam's decisive influence on him:
From the research book Western Jihadism: A Thirty-year history
Bin Laden became a disciple of a Palestinian refugee, Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, the man known as “the father of the global jihad.” Steve Coll, who interviewed Bin Laden’s classmates and friends, writes that Bin Laden started to read Azzam’s writings during his student days
(pg. 44)
in 1979 Bin Laden met Azzam in the United States... The wives of Azzam and Bin Laden both reported that their husbands visited each other frequently in the early 1980s, in Jeddah and in Amman, Jordan, where Azzam’s family remained.
(pg 45)
In 1983, Bin Laden joined with Azzam, his mentor from his university days, to establish Maktab Khadama¯t al-Muja¯hidīn al-’Arab (MAK), known in English as the Afghan Services Bureau of the Mujahideen, in Peshawar. The bureau funneled money and volunteers from Arab countries to the fighters in Afghanistan. Working with Azzam, Bin Laden also helped to internationalize the conflict in Afghanistan by setting up charities and recruiting volunteers in Muslim countries, the United States and Europe. On their travels to recruit and raise money for the struggle, the two men spread the word about the obligation incumbent on Muslims to join the armed struggle in defense of Muslim lands against the unbelievers. The struggle against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan came first, but Azzam left no doubt about the need to continue the jihad after victory over the communists. In 1986, Bin Laden moved to Peshawar, taking his family with him. From that point on he would maintain a base there.
(pg. 47)
Bin Laden’s operations in the United States grew out of the Salafi-jihadist network that had been put together in the 1980s to raise money for jihad and to recruit Americans to fight for the mujahideen in Afghanistan. Azzam, known as the “Father of the Global Jihad,” toured American cities in the 1980s, lecturing at mosques and visiting charities. At one point he was accompanied by Bin Laden, his disciple from university days in Jeddah.
(pg. 99)
From the book The Caravan: Abdallah Azzam and the Rise of Global Jihad
the very first meeting between Abdallah Azzam and Usama Bin Ladin happened in Indianapolis, Indiana, of all places, in early 1978
(pg. 98)
Bin Ladin was no stranger to Azzam. As we saw in Chapter 5, the two had met in America in 1978 as well as in Saudi Arabia when Azzam lived there. Moreover, Azzam had been a guest at Bin Ladin’s house in Jeddah several times in 1982 and 1983.18 As Azzam later recalled, “I used to visit him at his house in Jeddah whenever I used to go for Hajj or Umrah ... The first time he invited me to his house was in Ramadan [i.e. July 1982].”
(pg. 209)
It was Abdallah Azzam who, in early 1984, convinced Bin Ladin to go to Peshawar and on to the border areas. Azzam later said, “Brother Usama Bin Ladin came to Islamabad in 1984 bringing aid, and he was nervous about going to Peshawar, as some wise people advised him against it ... I told him: Do not listen to anyone and go to Jaji as Sheikh Sayyaf is there.”27 The visit became a turning point in Bin Ladin’s involvement in the Afghan jihad.
(pg. 211)
Bin Ladin’s justification for his war on America was merely anextension of Azzam’s idea of umma defense.
(pg. 327)
there was a degree of practical cooperation and dialogue between al-Qaida and the Services Bureau in 1988 and 1989. Tamim al-Adnani, the executive director of the Services Bureau, is recorded as having participated in several meetings with known al�Qaida figures in this period... Azzam was so keen to maintain cooperation with Usama Bin Ladin and his men that in late 1988 he proposed having bin Ladin appointed leader of all the Arabs. According to Abdallah Anas, Azzam gathered the original founders of the Services Bureau and told them to go to Usama’s house and “organize an election of sorts where Osama becomes the emir.
(pg. 362)
From the book "Father of Jihad:Abdullah Azzam's Jihad Ideas"]
`Azzam> ’s role during the Soviet–Afghan war period had tremendous contributions to the current state of national and international security, and can be described thus: 1. A jihad advocate who raised jihad awareness among Muslims all over the world and rallied them to participate and support jihad in Afghanistan. 2. A commander for foreign volunteers in Afghanistan, training them for jihad and deploying them to various fronts. 3. An ideologue who constructed jihad ideology to mobilise Muslims and indoctrinate fighters. 4. The founder of Maktab Al-Khidmat> which, whether intended or not, later transformed into Al-Qaeda. 5. A mentor to Bin Laden who went on to become the leader of Al-Qaeda, the leading jihadist organisation today.
Osama bin Ladens killing faked?
[edit]There is a few contradictions with the story of the revenge killing of Osama bin Laden. Major point being the legal system in the United States which has practice of giving out life sentences of 100+ years. Every foreign person shakes their head at this because very few people have a life over 120 years. Similarily fly/lure fishing is a common practice in the fishing sport of America. The practice of throwing or releasing fish back into the pond or water is common when the fish is not of certain size/weight. So in conclusion, people are asking why the US Navy aircraft carrier that took DNA samples from the carcass of Osama bin Laden threw him back into the Indian Ocean, instead of taking his remains to the US, for 100+ years of incarceration past death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.180.127.141 (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Why does "Osama" redirect to this page?
[edit]It's a fairly common given name. 2604:3D09:1785:9000:D178:A395:9F80:1C88 (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Good point. This encyclopedia has dozens of articles about various "Osamas", and searches for it should clearly go to the disambiguation page at Osama (disambiguation)... I have made that change. Marcus Markup (talk) 11:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your edit resulted in a WP:MALPLACED disambiguation page. If you think there is no primary topic for Osama, please propose moving Osama (disambiguation) to the base name. older ≠ wiser 12:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I don't "think there is no primary topic for Osama" per se. I, along with the IP, think re-directing "Osama" here is unencylopedic. Marcus Markup (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why is that unencyclopedic? And, if you don't think there is a primary topic, then the disambiguation page should be at the base name. Do not simply change the redirect target. older ≠ wiser 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's unencyclopedic because readers wanting to know about one of the dozens of other uses of "Osama", and who enter that term explicitly in the search box, should not have to be presented with the article of a terrorist to get there first. That such a search should go to the disambiguation page seems obvious to me.Marcus Markup (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's an opinion; but as with many other such names where one person is very strongly associated with the name, Wikipedia has for a very long time agreed that the name can redirect to such persons who are singularly extremely well-known by the name. older ≠ wiser 19:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Forcing every user who wants to know about the historic aspects of a subject, to first read the article about whatever it is which is the most popular search is of course, the operative modus here, but I will continue to defend old-school encyclopedic style, which would in no way require someone interested in the history of "Osama" to first be presented with the article of a terrorist, but that is, as you point out, simply my opinion, and I've made my case and I'm done re-iterating it. Marcus Markup (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't like "Hitler". Osama is a very common name. In the US, everyone thinks of Bin Laden, but in countries where it's a common given name, that's not the case. Osama (disambiguation) should be moved to Osama. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 02:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support moving the dab-page, per Zanahary. Draken Bowser (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Anyone can start a requested move discussion at the relevant talk page Talk:Osama (disambiguation). Note that because of the history, this would not qualify as an uncontroversial technical move. older ≠ wiser 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have started it here. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 15:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Anyone can start a requested move discussion at the relevant talk page Talk:Osama (disambiguation). Note that because of the history, this would not qualify as an uncontroversial technical move. older ≠ wiser 14:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support moving the dab-page, per Zanahary. Draken Bowser (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's an opinion; but as with many other such names where one person is very strongly associated with the name, Wikipedia has for a very long time agreed that the name can redirect to such persons who are singularly extremely well-known by the name. older ≠ wiser 19:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's unencyclopedic because readers wanting to know about one of the dozens of other uses of "Osama", and who enter that term explicitly in the search box, should not have to be presented with the article of a terrorist to get there first. That such a search should go to the disambiguation page seems obvious to me.Marcus Markup (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why is that unencyclopedic? And, if you don't think there is a primary topic, then the disambiguation page should be at the base name. Do not simply change the redirect target. older ≠ wiser 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I don't "think there is no primary topic for Osama" per se. I, along with the IP, think re-directing "Osama" here is unencylopedic. Marcus Markup (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your edit resulted in a WP:MALPLACED disambiguation page. If you think there is no primary topic for Osama, please propose moving Osama (disambiguation) to the base name. older ≠ wiser 12:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Osama (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "War in Terror" in the Reception and legacy section, to "War on Terror" Bflemingdc (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class FBI articles
- Top-importance FBI articles
- WikiProject FBI articles
- B-Class September 11, 2001 articles
- Top-importance September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject September 11, 2001 articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Saudi Arabia articles
- Mid-importance Saudi Arabia articles
- WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles
- B-Class Arab world articles
- Low-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- B-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Top-importance Crime-related articles
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- Top-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- B-Class Sudan articles
- Unknown-importance Sudan articles
- WikiProject Sudan articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- B-Class Afghanistan articles
- Mid-importance Afghanistan articles
- WikiProject Afghanistan articles
- B-Class Pakistan articles
- Low-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- B-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- B-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report