User talk:Ctobola: Difference between revisions
Drboisclair (talk | contribs) |
Pastordavid (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I am glad that you are aboard here to provide your input. Sharing your research on Lutheranism adds a different perspective. Being in the LCMS myself I can tell you that there is somewhat of a shift away from the conservatism of the 30 years prior to 2001. Our new leadership over the past half dozen years has seen to that.--[[User:Drboisclair|Drboisclair]] 16:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
I am glad that you are aboard here to provide your input. Sharing your research on Lutheranism adds a different perspective. Being in the LCMS myself I can tell you that there is somewhat of a shift away from the conservatism of the 30 years prior to 2001. Our new leadership over the past half dozen years has seen to that.--[[User:Drboisclair|Drboisclair]] 16:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
== [[Talk:Lutheranism]] == |
|||
Ctobola, thank you for your input on the Lutheranism article. However, I would kindly ask that you please stop your current discussion thread regarding [[User:CTSWyneken]]. It is very uncivil, and could be regarded as a personal attack. Please restrict your comments to the content of the article, and avoid speculation or accusations about the character of contributors. |
|||
What the LC-MS or WELS say on their websites is irrelevent to a conversation about another editor - CTS is not the LC-MS. Whether their positions are right or wrong is also irrelevent; they are what they are, and should be presented as such where it is appropriate for the encyclopedia to report such things. It is not appropriate to speculate on the connection between their corporate position and the character of a specific editor. -- '''[[User:Pastordavid|Pastor David]] <sup>[[User talk:Pastordavid|†]]''' </sup><small><sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/Pastordavid|(Review)]]</sub></small> 16:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:34, 30 April 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Ctobola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Flex (talk|contribs) 12:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Discussion at talk:Lutheranism
I am glad that you are aboard here to provide your input. Sharing your research on Lutheranism adds a different perspective. Being in the LCMS myself I can tell you that there is somewhat of a shift away from the conservatism of the 30 years prior to 2001. Our new leadership over the past half dozen years has seen to that.--Drboisclair 16:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Ctobola, thank you for your input on the Lutheranism article. However, I would kindly ask that you please stop your current discussion thread regarding User:CTSWyneken. It is very uncivil, and could be regarded as a personal attack. Please restrict your comments to the content of the article, and avoid speculation or accusations about the character of contributors.
What the LC-MS or WELS say on their websites is irrelevent to a conversation about another editor - CTS is not the LC-MS. Whether their positions are right or wrong is also irrelevent; they are what they are, and should be presented as such where it is appropriate for the encyclopedia to report such things. It is not appropriate to speculate on the connection between their corporate position and the character of a specific editor. -- Pastor David † (Review) 16:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
