Jump to content

German submarine U-534: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
The Museum closed [[5 February]] [[2006]]. On [[27 June]] 2007, the [[Merseytravel]] transit authority announced that it had acquired the submarine, which it plans to cut into three sections and display at the [[Woodside, Merseyside|Woodside Ferry Terminal]]. <ref>[http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/tm_method=full&objectid=19361329&siteid=50061-name_page.html Liverpool Daily Post: ''Woodside Ferry to be new home for rescued U-boat'' (July 2007)] Retrieved 25 Spetember 2007</ref>
The Museum closed [[5 February]] [[2006]]. On [[27 June]] 2007, the [[Merseytravel]] transit authority announced that it had acquired the submarine, which it plans to cut into three sections and display at the [[Woodside, Merseyside|Woodside Ferry Terminal]]. <ref>[http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/tm_method=full&objectid=19361329&siteid=50061-name_page.html Liverpool Daily Post: ''Woodside Ferry to be new home for rescued U-boat'' (July 2007)] Retrieved 25 Spetember 2007</ref>


On October 21, 2007, the Merseytravel passenger transport authority announced that the submarine would form the centrepiece of a new visitor attraction at Woodside ferry terminal. However, to facilitate the economical transportation of the boat to its new site, it will be cut into four sections. U-534 will then be displayed in this form to allow visitors better access and visibility. Merseytravel said that preserving the hull intact would have created prohibitive transport costs.<ref1> [http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2007/10/22/u-boat-s-future-is-secure-64375-19987639/]
On October 21, 2007, the Merseytravel passenger transport authority announced that the submarine would form the centrepiece of a new visitor attraction at Woodside ferry terminal. However, to facilitate the economical transportation of the boat to its new site, it will be cut into four sections. U-534 will then be displayed in this form to allow visitors better access and visibility. Merseytravel said that preserving the hull intact would have created prohibitive transport costs.<ref> [http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2007/10/22/u-boat-s-future-is-secure-64375-19987639/Liverpool Daily Post: ''U-boat's future is secured'' (October 2007)] Retrieved 22 October 2007</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 19:55, 22 October 2007

U-534 at the Nautilus Museum, Birkenhead near Liverpool, UK
U-534 at Birkenhead Docks, Merseyside, England
Part of the hull and conning tower of U-534

Unterseeboot 534 was a Type IXC/40 U-boat of the Kriegsmarine and was built in 1942 in Hamburg-Finkenwerder by Deutsche Werft AG.

She was sunk on 5 May 1945 by 10 depth charges launched from a British Liberator aircraft. She sank in the waters of Kattegat north-west of Elsinore, in position 56°39′N 11°48′E / 56.650°N 11.800°E / 56.650; 11.800. In 1993 Danish media millionaire, Karsten Ree, sponsored the raising of the submarine amid rumours of nazi gold and intense media coverage. Hopes of gold treasure were disappointed, however, as the ship contained nothing but what was to be expected. In 1996 she was transported to Birkenhead, UK and formed part of the Warship Preservation Trust's collection at the Birkenhead docks.

The Museum closed 5 February 2006. On 27 June 2007, the Merseytravel transit authority announced that it had acquired the submarine, which it plans to cut into three sections and display at the Woodside Ferry Terminal. [1]

On October 21, 2007, the Merseytravel passenger transport authority announced that the submarine would form the centrepiece of a new visitor attraction at Woodside ferry terminal. However, to facilitate the economical transportation of the boat to its new site, it will be cut into four sections. U-534 will then be displayed in this form to allow visitors better access and visibility. Merseytravel said that preserving the hull intact would have created prohibitive transport costs.[2]

References