German battleship Bismarck: Difference between revisions
added link to Herbert Wohlfahrt |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Throughout that night, ''Bismarck'' was the target of incessant torpedo attacks by the [[Tribal class destroyer (1936)|Tribal-class destroyer]]s [[HMS Cossack (F03)|''Cossack'']], [[HMS Sikh (F82)|''Sikh'']], [[HMS Maori (F24)|''Maori'']], and [[HMS Zulu (F18)|''Zulu'']], with the Polish [[ORP Piorun (G65)|''Piorun'']]. Neither side scored a hit but the constant worrying tactics of the British helped wear down the morale of the Germans and deepened the fatigue of an already exhausted crew. |
Throughout that night, ''Bismarck'' was the target of incessant torpedo attacks by the [[Tribal class destroyer (1936)|Tribal-class destroyer]]s [[HMS Cossack (F03)|''Cossack'']], [[HMS Sikh (F82)|''Sikh'']], [[HMS Maori (F24)|''Maori'']], and [[HMS Zulu (F18)|''Zulu'']], with the Polish [[ORP Piorun (G65)|''Piorun'']]. Neither side scored a hit but the constant worrying tactics of the British helped wear down the morale of the Germans and deepened the fatigue of an already exhausted crew. |
||
Both ''Ark Royal'' and ''King George V'' had a lucky escape during the night. The British ships were unaware they had come within firing range of Kapitänleutnant Herbert Wohlfahrt's [[Unterseeboot 556| U-556]]. However ''U-556'' was returning from a combat patrol and had spent it's torpedoes. This was particularly galling for Wohlfahrt, as ''U-556'' and ''Bismarck'' had exercised together in the Baltic<ref>Jackson 2002, p. 49.</ref>. ''U-556'' continued to shadow the British forces, reporting their position and guiding other ''U-Boats'' to the area. |
Both ''Ark Royal'' and ''King George V'' had a lucky escape during the night. The British ships were unaware they had come within firing range of ''Kapitänleutnant'' [[Herbert Wohlfahrt]]'s [[Unterseeboot 556| U-556]]. However ''U-556'' was returning from a combat patrol and had spent it's torpedoes. This was particularly galling for Wohlfahrt, as ''U-556'' and ''Bismarck'' had exercised together in the Baltic<ref>Jackson 2002, p. 49.</ref>. ''U-556'' continued to shadow the British forces, reporting their position and guiding other ''U-Boats'' to the area<ref>[http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/miscellaneous/special_bond/specialbond.html The Special Bond between the Bismarck and U-556]</ref>. |
||
===Sinking=== |
===Sinking=== |
Revision as of 23:21, 18 March 2008
CG images of Bismarck from several angles as painted for Operation Rheinübung. The identification aid, a swastika, was painted over prior to the operation
| |
History | |
---|---|
Germany | |
Name | Bismarck |
Ordered | 16 November 1935 |
Builder | Blohm & Voss, Hamburg |
Laid down | 1 July 1936 |
Launched | 14 February 1939 |
Commissioned | 24 August 1940 |
Fate | Lost 27 May 1941 (see Controversy Section) |
General characteristics | |
Displacement | list error: <br /> list (help) 41,700 tonnes standard 50,900 tonnes full load |
Length | list error: <br /> list (help) 251 metres (823.5 ft) overall 241.5 metres (792.3 ft) waterline |
Beam | 36.0 metres (118.1 ft) waterline |
Draft | list error: <br /> list (help) 9.3 metres (30.5 ft) standard 10.2 metres (33.5 ft) full load |
Propulsion | list error: <br /> list (help) 12 Wagner high-pressure; 3 Blohm & Voss geared turbines; 3 three-blade propellers, 4.70 m diameter 150,170 hp (121 MW) |
Speed | 30.8 knots |
Range | 8,525 nm at 19 knots |
Complement | 2,092: 103 officers 1,989 men (1941) |
Armament | list error: <br /> list (help) 8×380 mm/L48.5 SK-C/34 (4×2) 12×150 mm/L55 SK-C/28 16×105 mm/L65 SK-C/37 / SK-C/33 16 × 37 mm/L83 SK-C/30 12×20 mm/L65 MG C/30 (Single) 8×20 mm/L65 MG C/38 (Quadruple) |
Armor | list error: <br /> list (help) Belt: 145 to 320 mm Deck: 50 to 120 mm Bulkheads: 220 mm Turrets: 130 to 360 mm Barbettes: 342 mm Conning tower: 360 mm |
Aircraft carried | 4×Arado Ar 196 A-3, with 1 double-ended catapult |
The German battleship Bismarck is one of the most famous warships of the Second World War. The lead ship of her class, she was named after the 19th-century German chancellor Otto von Bismarck. Bismarck's fame came from the Battle of the Denmark Strait in May 1941 (in which the battlecruiser HMS Hood, flagship and pride of the Royal Navy, was sunk), from Churchill's subsequent order to "Sink the Bismarck",[1] and from the relentless pursuit by the Royal Navy that ended with her loss only three days later.
History
Design of the ship started in the early 1930s, following on from Germany's development of the Deutschland class cruisers and the Gneisenau class "battlecruisers". Construction of the second French Dunkerque class battleship made redesign necessary, and Bismarck's displacement was increased to 41,700 tons. Officially, however, her tonnage was 35,000 tons to suggest parity with ships built within the limits of the Anglo-German Naval Agreement (1935) that allowed Germany to build up to five 35,000-ton battleships, the maximum displacement agreed by the major powers in the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922. Fully laden, Bismarck and her sister-ship Tirpitz would each displace more than 50,000 tons. The prototype of the proposed battleships envisaged under Plan Z, Bismarck's keel was laid down at the Blohm + Voss shipyard in Hamburg on 1 July 1936. She was launched on 14 February 1939 and commissioned on 24 August 1940 with Kapitän zur See Ernst Lindemann in command.
This formidable ship, the largest warship then commissioned, was intended primarily as a commerce raider, having a broad beam for stability in the rough seas of the North Atlantic and fuel stores as large as those of battleships intended for operations in the Pacific Ocean. Still, with eight 15 inch main guns in four turrets, substantial welded-armour protection and designed for a top speed of not less than 29 knots (she actually achieved 30.1 knots in trials in the calmer waters of the Baltic, an impressive speed when set against any comparable British battleship), Bismarck was capable of engaging any enemy battleship on reasonably equal terms. Her range of weaponry could easily decimate any convoy she encountered. The plan was for Bismarck to break through into the spacious waters of the North Atlantic, where she could refuel from German tankers and remain undetected by British and American aircraft, submarines and ships, while attacking the convoys.
Combat history
Breakout into the Atlantic
Bismarck sailed on her first and only mission, codenamed Rheinübung (Rhine Exercise) on 18 May 1941, accompanied by the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen. Other capital ships, including the battlecruisers Gneisenau and Scharnhorst, that were to have participated in the sortie were unavailable because of mechanical problems and war damage; and plans to use Bismarck's sister ship, Tirpitz, were shelved because she had not yet finished sea trials. Despite these setbacks, the mission went ahead under the command of Admiral Günther Lütjens. The Germans had various objectives: destroy as much Allied shipping as possible and force the British to suspend convoys, even temporarily; compensate for their weak submarine presence in the Atlantic; divert British naval forces from the Mediterranean to reduce the risks of the planned invasion of Crete and to allow Rommel and his forces to cross to Libya.
The British Admiralty had already suspected that a breakout was likely and Bismarck's departure was confirmed for them from a combination of Ultra intelligence (deciphered Enigma code messages), a report from the Swedish cruiser Gotland that had sighted the battleship, and the Norwegian resistance. The latter sent the following message to the British: "A battleship, assumed to be German, passed by Kristiansand heading west, escorted by three destroyers". Three days later, she was photographed by a Spitfire reconnaissance aircraft while resting in a Norwegian fjord (Grimstadfjorden, near Bergen). A subsequent bombing raid by the RAF proved fruitless, as the Germans had already left. Royal Navy cruisers and other warships were deployed to watch the various routes she could take into the Atlantic.
Heading north, then north-west, the German fleet made good and largely uneventful progress across the Norwegian Sea towards Greenland and the Denmark Strait between Iceland and Greenland, the gateway into the Atlantic. While in waters to the north of the Arctic Circle, it remained undetected by British air reconnaissance, which was too far south. With a mind on convoy-raiding, Lütjens was hopeful of an easy breakout into the Atlantic, aided by foggy weather, but his plans were to be frustrated.
On the evening of 23 May, the German force was detected by the radar-equipped heavy cruisers HMS Suffolk and Norfolk, that had been patrolling the Denmark Strait in the expectation of a German breakout. The rival ships exchanged fire but the heavily outgunned British cruisers sensibly retired to a safe range and shadowed the enemy while their own heavy units drew closer. However, Bismarck's forward radar had malfunctioned as the result of her heavy guns firing. This obliged Lütjens to order Prinz Eugen to move ahead of Bismarck in order to provide the squadron with forward radar coverage. This later confused the converging British forces as to the identity of each German ship, their silhouettes being similar.
Battle of the Denmark Strait
At approximately 05:30 on Saturday 24 May, as the German squadron was about to leave the Denmark Strait, Prinz Eugen's hydrophones detected the presence of two additional ships some distance to port. By 05:45 both were in sight, although the German fleet had not yet identified the enemy force. It turned out to be a British battle-group comprising the new battleship Prince of Wales, and the battlecruiser Hood, under the command of Rear Admiral Lancelot Holland. Prince of Wales had only recently been completed and was still being worked up (indeed, she sailed to meet Bismarck with about 100 civilian workers still onboard completing her fitting-out). Hood had been built as a battlecruiser and modified to give her protection more like a battleship, but still had relatively weak deck armour. That other British ships had detected them was not unexpected by the Germans but that they would turn out to be capital ships was a nasty surprise.
At 05:49 Holland ordered fire to be concentrated on the leading German ship, Prinz Eugen, believing it to be Bismarck. Fortunately for the British, the captain of Prince of Wales was soon to realise the error and changed his target. Holland amended his order on the correct ship to be engaged but this did not reach Hood's gunnery control before the first salvo. Hood fired first at 05:52, in daylight, followed very soon afterwards by Prince of Wales. The range to the German ships was c. 12.5 miles.
More than two minutes went by without a reply from the Germans, before Captain Lindemann ordered fire to be returned on the lead British ship. This was Hood, which the Germans had identified only when the British squadron made a turn towards them at 05:55. This manoeuvre was undertaken, it appears, in an attempt to place themselves in the "zone of immunity". Closer in, Hood would be less vulnerable to plunging fire and the advantage of superior German gunnery control would be lessened. The disadvantage was that, during the dash, eight of the eighteen British heavy guns could not be brought to bear.
Both Bismarck and Prinz Eugen opened fire on Hood, at a range of 11 miles. The early gunfire from the German ships was very accurate and within two minutes Hood had been hit by an 8″ shell from Prinz Eugen. It struck the British ship near the mainmast and caused a large fire which Hood's crew tried to bring under control. However, Bismarck had also been hit by Prince of Wales, causing a fuel leak from the forward tanks; therefore Lütjens ordered his cruiser to switch its guns towards Prince of Wales, which his own secondary guns were now targeting.
At 06:00 Hood, which was about to turn to port to bring her full weight of armament to bear on Bismarck, was hit amidships by at least one shell from Bismarck at a distance of under 9 miles. Very shortly afterwards observers on both sides saw a huge jet of flame race skywards, followed by a rumbling explosion that split the huge ship in two. Splinters rained down on Prince of Wales, 400 yards away. Hood's stern rose and sank shortly before the bow, all within three minutes. Admiral Holland and 1,415 crewmen went down with the ship. Only three men (Ted Briggs, Bob Tilburn, and Bill Dundas) survived this disaster. They were rescued about two hours later by the destroyer Electra. The British Admiralty later concluded that the most likely explanation for the loss of Hood was a penetration of her magazines by a single 15″ shell from Bismarck, causing the subsequent catastrophic explosion. Recent research by submersible craft suggests that the initial explosion could have been in the aft 4″ magazine, followed by the aft 15″ magazine and that it may also have spread to the forward 15″ magazines via the starboard side ammunition passage.
Prince of Wales had to turn towards the German fleet to avoid hitting the wreckage left by the flagship and was hit a number of times by gunfire from both German ships. Still, her own gunfire had caused damage to Bismarck. The British battleship turned away, laying smoke, her aft turret firing briefly under local control. She had received 7 hits (3 of them from Prinz Eugen) and mechanical failures had left her with all but one of her main guns out of action. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were forced into emergency manoeuvres when they believed they had detected the sounds of torpedoes and then by the appearance of a Sunderland flying-boat. Although Captain Lindemann wanted to chase Prince of Wales and "finish her off", Admiral Lütjens ignored his suggestions since delay risked the possibility of encountering more warships and prejudiced his main task of convoy destruction. Incredibly, in a battle lasting less than 20 minutes Bismarck, with her impressive consort punching above her weight, had destroyed one capital ship and forced another to turn away, something almost unknown in the Royal Navy and which was to cause the Admiralty to hold a special board of inquiry.
Faulty intelligence had led the Germans to believe that Prince of Wales was not yet ready for action, therefore reports from Bismarck referred to her as King George V, the first of that class, which had been active for some months.
Despite the jubilation onboard Bismarck, the battleship was not safe. The British knew her position; her forward radar was out of action (a consequence of the skirmish with the British cruisers the previous day) and she had received three hits, one of which caused water to leak into and contaminate fuel oil in storage. From then on, she had to reduce speed to a maximum of 20 knots to conserve fuel. Lütjens eventually decided that he would have to head for the French coast (the dry-dock in St Nazaire) for repairs. The British continued to shadow her, Prince of Wales having rendezvoused with Norfolk and Suffolk. At one stage Bismarck rounded briefly on her pursuers, in order to give Prinz Eugen the opportunity to detach and escape with the message: "Good hunting".
The chase
Determined to avenge the sinking of Hood, the British committed every possible unit to hunting down Bismarck. During the early evening of 24 May an attack was made by a small group of Swordfish biplane torpedo bombers from 825 Naval Air Squadron of the aircraft carrier Victorious. One hit was scored resulting in a single fatality (Bismarck's first); however, the blast caused only superficial damage to Bismarck’s armoured belt.
For some time Bismarck remained under long-distance observation by the British. At about 03:00 on 25 May, the ship took advantage of her opponents' zig-zagging and performed an almost three-quarter clockwise turn behind her pursuers to escape towards the east and then south-east. Contact was lost for four hours; however, perhaps in awe of British radar capabilities, it appears that the Germans did not realise their good fortune. For reasons still unclear, Lütjens transmitted a half-hour radio message to HQ, which was intercepted thereby giving the British time to work out roughly where he was heading. However, a plotting error made onboard King George V, now in pursuit of the Germans, incorrectly calculated Bismarck’s position and caused the chase to veer too far north. Bismarck was therefore able to make good time on 25/26 May in her unhindered passage towards France and protective air cover and destroyer escort. By now, though, fuel was becoming a major concern to both sides.
The British had a stroke of luck on 26 May. In mid-morning a Royal Air Force Coastal Command Catalina reconnaissance aircraft from 209 Squadron, which had flown over the Atlantic from its base on Lough Erne in Northern Ireland across Donegal through a small corridor secretly provided by the Éire government[2], spotted Bismarck (via her oil-slick) and reported her position to the Admiralty. From then on, the German ship's position was known to the British, although the enemy would have to be slowed significantly if heavy units hoped to engage it out of range of German aircraft protection. All British hopes were now pinned on Force H, whose main units were the aircraft-carrier Ark Royal, the old battlecruiser Renown and the cruiser Sheffield. This battle-group, commanded by Admiral James Somerville, had been diverted north from Gibraltar.
At dusk that evening, and in atrocious weather conditions, Swordfish from Ark Royal launched an attack. The first wave mistakenly targeted the Sheffield that was by now shadowing the quarry. Although precious time was lost by this incident, it proved beneficial to the British in that the magnetic detonators on the torpedoes used against Sheffield were seen to be defective and for the following attack on Bismarck were replaced by those designed to explode on contact. In a final attack, almost in darkness at around 21:00, a hit by a single torpedo (launched by pilot John Moffat's plane) jammed Bismarck's rudder and steering gear. This rendered Bismarck virtually unmanoeuvrable, increased her list to port and she was able only to steam in a large circle in the general direction of King George V and Rodney, two frontline battleships that had been in pursuit from the west. After extensive efforts to free the jammed rudders, the fleet command finally acknowledged their by-now impossible position in several messages to naval headquarters. Lütjens promised that the ship would fight until its last shell was spent.
Throughout that night, Bismarck was the target of incessant torpedo attacks by the Tribal-class destroyers Cossack, Sikh, Maori, and Zulu, with the Polish Piorun. Neither side scored a hit but the constant worrying tactics of the British helped wear down the morale of the Germans and deepened the fatigue of an already exhausted crew.
Both Ark Royal and King George V had a lucky escape during the night. The British ships were unaware they had come within firing range of Kapitänleutnant Herbert Wohlfahrt's U-556. However U-556 was returning from a combat patrol and had spent it's torpedoes. This was particularly galling for Wohlfahrt, as U-556 and Bismarck had exercised together in the Baltic[3]. U-556 continued to shadow the British forces, reporting their position and guiding other U-Boats to the area[4].
Sinking
On the morning of Tuesday, 27 May 1941 Rodney and King George V drew closer to Bismarck, with their enemy well illuminated by the morning sun in the background. Rodney steered to the north so that her gunfire would work the length of Bismarck, while King George V took the side. They opened fire at 08:47. Bismarck returned fire, but her inability to steer, and her list to port, severely affected her shooting. Her low speed (seven knots) also made her an easy target, and she was soon hit several times, with heavy cruisers Norfolk and Dorsetshire adding their firepower. At 09:02 a heavy shell disabled both forward turrets of Bismarck and an 8-inch shell from Norfolk hit the main gun director, killing the gunnery officer. Later, another salvo destroyed the forward control post, killing most of the senior officers. Within 45 minutes, Bismarck's heavy guns were all silent. Rodney now closed to point-blank range (approximately 3 km) to pound the superstructure, while King George V fired from further out.
Bismarck continued to fly her ensign. With no sign of surrender despite the unequal struggle, the British were loath to leave Bismarck. Their fuel and shell supplies were low, a demonstration of how difficult it was for a battleship to sink a similar unit, even in an unbalanced engagement. However, when it became obvious that their enemy could not reach port, Rodney, King George V and the destroyers were sent home. Norfolk had used its last torpedoes; therefore, Dorsetshire launched three 21 in (533 mm) torpedoes, which may have hit Bismarck at comparatively short range. Although the battleship's upper works were almost completely destroyed, her engines were still functioning, and the hull appeared to be relatively sound; therefore, rather than risk her being captured, survivors have said the order to scuttle and then abandon ship was given. Many of the crew went into the water, but few sailors from the lower engine spaces got out alive. As Captain Lindemann was presumed killed with all officers after the bridge was hit by a 16 inch shell, it is unclear whether he could have given the order to scuttle. Some of the survivors, though, strongly believe they saw him going down alive with his ship.
Bismarck went under the waves at 10:39 that morning. Unaware of the fate of the ship, Group West, the German command base, continued to issue signals to Bismarck for some hours, until Reuters reported news from Britain that the ship had been sunk. In Britain, the House of Commons was informed of the sinking early that afternoon.
Dorsetshire and Maori stopped to rescue survivors, but a U-boat alarm caused them to leave the scene after rescuing only 110 Bismarck sailors, abandoning the surviving crew in the water. The next morning U-74, dispatched to try to rescue Bismarck's log-book (and which had heard sinking noises from a distance), and the German weather ship Sachsenwald picked up 5 survivors. In all, almost 2,100 German sailors had lost their lives.
After the sinking John Tovey said, "The Bismarck had put up a most gallant fight against impossible odds worthy of the old days of the Imperial German Navy, and she went down with her colours flying."
Role of the Luftwaffe
The Luftwaffe came under heavy criticism from Hitler for failing to help Bismarck on the morning of her final battle. Luftflotte 3 had been apprised of Bismarck's intentions as early as 24 May, and its units, mainly equipped with Heinkel He 111s, could have been positioned to help the ship. On 26 May Bismarck was within 700 miles of the French coast (as reported by Flying Officer Dennis Briggs flying a Catalina of No. 209 squadron)[5]. An attack by the He 111s, with a maximum range of 1,750 miles, could have slowed down Ark Royal and prevented the Fairey Swordfish attack which crippled Bismarck. As it was, the Luftwaffe appeared over the battle area an hour after Bismarck had sunk. 17 Kampfgeschwader 28 He 111s attacked Ark Royal but their bombs missed. Only 218 sorties were flown by the Luftwaffe in support of Rheinübung with KG 100, KG 1, KG 54 and KG 77. The only casualty of these raids was HMS Mashona, which sank on 28 May off the west coast of Ireland[6]. A Fw 200 Condor had sighted HMS Rodney but was unable to communicate the position accurately without radar, reporting her as 200 miles further from the French coast than was the case. Thus a possible chance for the Luftwaffe to attack the British battleship was lost. Meaningful missions did not start until 03:00 on 27 May, by which time Bismarck's fate was sealed[7].
Aftermath
Over the years, the ship achieved near mythological status and was popularised in 1960 by the film Sink the Bismarck! and Johnny Horton's hit song of the same title. The wreck of Bismarck was discovered on 8 June 1989 by Dr. Robert Ballard, the oceanographer also responsible for finding the Titanic. Bismarck rests upright at a depth of approximately 4,700 m (15,500 ft) about 650 kilometres west of Brest, France. Analysis of the wreck showed extensive damage to the superstructure by shelling and some minor damage to the hull by torpedo hits, but also suggested that the Germans scuttled the ship to hasten its sinking. This has never been proven by marine investigators but is confirmed by survivors. Ballard has kept the exact location of the wreck a secret to prevent other divers from taking artifacts from the ship, a practice he considers a form of grave robbing.
A later dive on the wreck also identified the location, and brought back further images, as part of a documentary sponsored by the British Channel 4 on Bismarck and Hood.
The documentary film Expedition: Bismarck (2002), directed by James Cameron and filmed using MIR submersibles, reconstructs the events leading to the sinking of Bismarck. His findings were that there was not enough damage below the waterline of the ship to confirm that she was actually sunk by shells and torpedoes. In fact, upon close inspection of the wreckage, it was confirmed that none of the torpedoes or shells penetrated the second layer of the inner hull, supporting the Germans' story of having scuttled their own ship.
Controversy surrounding the Sinking
The second Bismarck expedition in 2001 was Anglo-American and funded by a UK TV channel. It followed-on from the same team's prior discovery of the long-lost wreckage of Hood which was located and filmed for the first time.
The Anglo-American team (David Mearns and Bill Jurens from the USA and Professor Eric Grove from the UK) conducted its own sonar survey from scratch to find the Bismarck wreck site, based solely on available information that it was resting at the foot of the only undersea volcano in that area. Then they used ROVs to film the hull externally and concluded that the ship sank due to combat damage, having received numerous artillery and torpedo hits from the British.
Ballard criticised this documentary, citing what he considered nationalistic, biased research of limited historic value due to lack of thoroughness. A new American expedition visited the site using smaller and more agile ROVs. These provided some interior shots of Bismarck for the first time, which were aired as part of a one-hour documentary film on the National Geographic Channel (NGC).
The third survey found no underwater penetrations of the ship's fully-armoured citadel and only four direct hit holes on it above the waterline, all of them on one side, as delivered by Rodney's 16 inch (406 mm) guns. Huge dents showed that the 14 inch (356 mm) shells fired by King George V bounced off the German belt armour[citation needed]. Interior ROV footage showed that the "terrible destruction" the Anglo-American expedition reported was in fact the torpedo bulges, which were designed to absorb the energy of torpedoes and plunging shells. Underneath the torn bulge sheeting, the ship's 320 mm (12.6 inch) thick main belt armour appeared to be intact.
The American expedition's final conclusions were strikingly different from the findings of the Anglo-American team. They estimated that Bismarck could still float for at least a day when the British vessels ceased fire and could have been captured by the Royal Navy. They concluded the direct cause of sinking was due to scuttling: sabotage of engine-room valves by her crew, as claimed by German survivors. A detailed look at a modern computer analysis of the hull's eventual impact on the sea bottom explains some damage as a result of hydrodynamic impact shock inside the ship, which was still apparently girded by an uninterrupted curtain of armour.
In all 2,876 shells of various calibres were fired by the British ships. Approximately 300-400 hit. Only two hits fully penetrating the main armour were located. These holes were on the starboard side, suggesting that they were 16-inch shells from Rodney. Two other penetrations above the main armour belt were found on the port side, and appeared to be by 14-inch shells. In all 714 14-inch and 16-inch shells were fired by the two battleships, of which about 80 hit Bismarck. Only four penetrated the belt but in successive hits the shells had destroyed A turret, B turret, each gun director and the bridge.
When senior Bismarck survivor the late Freiherr von Müllenheim-Rechberg was asked for his opinion on the controversy in a British television interview he simply replied politely, "Both sides sank the Bismarck."
Criticisms of ship's design
While Bismarck was a powerful ship, the long hiatus in German capital ship building from 1919 until 1933 led to a conservative design that was to some degree flawed[8] and outmoded.[9] Borrowing from the design of the World War I Bayern class battleships and the incomplete Mackensen class battlecruisers,[10] the ship was completed with some of her vitals above her armoured belt.[11] This particular weakness left many communication systems, including her main damage control centre, open to destruction[12] and may have contributed to her relatively rapid silencing in her final engagement.
A close study of the ship's layout, however, reveals that all fire-control and damage-control rooms are doubled[citation needed] and beneath the main armour deck[citation needed] (in the citadel); and the cables from bridge and range finders were all leading through the three armoured shafts between these stations and the rooms beneath the main armoured deck[citation needed]. The drawbacks of Bismarck's "outdated" armoured design, therefore, were the shallowness of the armoured belt under sea level, the danger from plunging shells and the insufficient thickness of the layers of armour around the rudder shafts.
A further example of outmoded design was the provision of both a secondary armament of twelve 5.9-inch guns and the inclusion of a separate battery of sixteen 4.1-inch high-angle (anti-aircraft) guns. This fitting of two types of weapons lagged behind the dual-purpose secondary armaments of Allied ships that allowed them to engage both air or surface targets, thereby saving on weight used elsewhere in their designs and facilitating superior fire-control systems.[13] However, as Bismarck was supposed to operate against enemy destroyers,[citation needed] these 5.9-inch batteries were necessary to defend the ship.
See also
- Tirpitz, the second ship of the Bismarck class battleships
- List of ship launches in 1939
- List of ship commissionings in 1940
- List of shipwrecks in 1941
- Last battle of the battleship Bismarck
- List of battleships of Germany
- List of naval ships of Germany
- List of Kriegsmarine ships
References
- ^ http://www.pbs.org/hood/history/battles.html
- ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar/stories/09/a2059409.shtml
- ^ Jackson 2002, p. 49.
- ^ The Special Bond between the Bismarck and U-556
- ^ Jackson 2002, p.48.
- ^ Jackson 2002, P. 53.
- ^ Jackson 2002, p. 50-52
- ^ Admiralty report CB 04039(2) Immune zone analysis of Tirpitz, King George V, Nelson, and Queen Elizabeth
- ^ Battleships Anthony Preston p105
- ^ Battleships Anthony Preston p105
- ^ Admiralty report CB 04039(2) Immune zone analysis of Tirpitz, King George V, Nelson, and Queen Elizabeth
- ^ Garzke, William, and John Dulin. Battleships: Axis and Neutral Battleships in World War II. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990
- ^ Battleships Anthony Preston p105
- Burkhard Baron von Mullenheim-Rechberg, Battleship Bismarck, A Survivor's Story (United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, 1980).
- Robert D. Ballard The Discovery of the Bismarck (Madison Publishing, Toronto, 1990).
- Jack Brower The Battleship Bismarck (Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, (Maryland), 2005) ISBN 1591140501.
- Robert Jackson. The Bismarck. Weapons of War: London, 2002. ISBN 1-86227-173-9
- John Roberts The Battlecruiser Hood (Conway Maritime Press), 2001) ISBN 0-85177-900-x
- José M. Rico, The Battleship Bismarck. The Complete History of a Legendary Ship (KBismarck.com, 2004).
- Admiralty report CB 04039(2) Immune zone analysis of Tirpitz, KGV, Nelson, and QE
- Most recently (in 2006), the Bismarck was featured on an episode of the History Channel's "Dogfights" entitled "Hunt for the Bismarck".
- The Special Bond between the Bismarck and U-556
- Bismarck Portrait of the Men Involved
Further reading
- Ludovic Kennedy, Pursuit: The Sinking of the Bismarck
- C.S. Forester, Hunting the Bismarck (first published by Michael Joseph Ltd in 1959)
- Ulrich Elfrath and Bodo Herzog, The Battleship Bismarck: A Documentary in Words and Pictures (Schifer Publishing; Atglen, Pennsylvania; 1989) (originally published in German as Schlachtschiff Bismarck, Ein Bericht in Bildern und Dokumentation, Podzun-Palles Verlag, Friedberg, 1975).
- Per Hansson, Det Største Spillet, Gyldendal, 1965
- Robert Jackson. The Bismarck. Weapons of War: London, 2002. ISBN 1-86227-173-9
- Paul J. Kemp, Bismarck and Hood: Great Naval Adversaries (Arms and Armor Press, London, 1991)
- Siegfried Breyer, Battleships and Battlecruisers 1905-1970 (Doubleday and Company; Garden City, New York, 1973) (originally published in German as Schlachtschiffe und Schlachtkreuzer 1905-1970, J.F. Lehmanns, Verlag, Munchen, 1970).
- David J. Bercuson and Holger H. Herwig The Destruction of the Bismarck (Stoddart Pulishing, Toronto, 2001).
- Graham Rhys-Jones The Loss of the Bismarck: An Avoidable Disaster (Cassell & Company, London, 1999).
- Antonio Bonomi, Stretto di Danimarca, 24 maggio 1941, "Storia Militare" magazine, December 2005.
External links
- KBismarck.com - The Battleship Bismarck
- Battleship Bismarck & Tirpitz - English
- Bismarck Legend Lives
- Maritimequest Bismarck photo gallery
- Underwater footage of the Bismarck wreck
- A detailed article about the armour protection of the Bismarck