User talk:L0b0t

text

This user is a bibliophile. User:Fix Bayonets!//Userboxes/Confederate defend ancestors X This user does not believe in the existence of human races, except as a social construct. X This user is a grognard. text [1] Ft. ORD 3\9 MANCHU I REMEMBER THE DAYS OF D.R.F.AND BEING UNABLE TO GO ANYWHERE THAT DID NOT HAVE A PHONE:).I CAN STILL PICTURE THE BAKYARD THERE ON PLANET ORD .AND THOSE ROAD MARCHES WERE@#**#@!!! NEVER MIND THAT:) . I THINK BACK ON MY TIME AND WHAT IT MEANS THEN I THINK ABOUT YOU GUYS THAT ARE IN NOW. NO MATTER HOW HARD IT GETS REMEMBER YOU ARE A MANCHU BE WHERE THEY DONT EXPECT DOING WHAT NO ONE ELSE CAN . KEEP UP THE FIRE !!( LET THEM CHOKE ON THE SMOKE )IF YOU ARE GOING TO WRITE THE HISTORY I WOULD THINK YOU WOULD WRITE IT ALL. THE 7 I.D. WAS A GREAT PLACE TO BE , BUT I GUESS YOU HAD TO BE THERE TO UNDERSTAND. WHOOAHH!! LIGHT FIGHTER FORT ORD CA. 7th.I.D 3rd BN. 9th INF. RGT. LIGHT FIGHTER (88-92) Keep Up the Fire 86-90 2nd Manchus Oldwildbill (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Jockamo feeno ai na nay' Hey, I have no idea how that AfD discussion on the Baton Rouge crewe is going to wind up, but I'm enjoying your input and observations. Please accept this as a token of my appreciation: The Purple Barnstar For standing out in your ability to bring vibrancy and style to the Wikipedia community! Ecoleetage (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC) When this is over, let's hit Bourbon Street (or the Baton Rouge equivalent!). Ecoleetage (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Thank you so much. My very first barnstar, I shall cherish it always. Last time I was in Baton Rouge was for a friend's graduation from LSU. Laura Bush was the speaker and she brought her husband, thanks to their security precautions traffic was bad and graduation was an absolute nightmare. Cops and Secret Service everywhere. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 00:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Yes, I can understand how those guests would disrupt what should have been a memorable moment. Thanks again! Ecoleetage (talk) 02:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Hey, it appears the article wound up being kept, as per no consensus. Oh well, on to other points of interest... Ecoleetage (talk) 19:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC) John Hodgman I got a source for my edit, but I'll go ahead and follow your lead and remove every line from the John Hodgman article that is not sourced. 99.150.120.18 (talk) 01:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks for citing a source for your edit. As for following my lead, it's not so much "my lead" as it is the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living people, you may read up the policy here. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 01:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Thriving Referring to something as "thriving" is not a statement of fact. It is just your opinion, you cannot assert your opinion as a fact. 99.150.120.18 (talk) 01:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC) NO, it's the consensus of the majority of editors on that article. Do you have any evidence to suggest that NOLA does not have a thriving gay community? There are several cities in the US with thriving gay communities: San Francisco, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, New Orleans, Fire Island, Key West. New Orleans certainly has a thriving gay community when compared to nearby cities like Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Gulfport, or Biloxi. This thriving community is centered at St. Ann & Bourbon in the 1/4, NOLA has one of the oldest gay-bars in the US and is home to Southern Decadence. Why do you object to the characterization thriving? Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC) Link me to the discussion where editors came to a consensus on the inclusion of the word "thriving". You can say that the community is centered there, but you cannot classify it as a thriving community, thats a matter of opinion. You may call it "thriving", others may call it "relatively small" (in comparison to other New Orleans cultural groups) some may call it "sinful". The fact is that your asseration that it's "thriving" is no more valid than someone claiming it to be "sinfuL". 99.150.120.18 (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Apples and oranges my friend. If you have a source that says the NOLA gay community is not thriving and vibrant compared to the rest of the region, or even compared to the rest of the United States, then you are welcome to take this up at the article's talk page. Until then please keep your POV on mythology and behavior to yourself. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 21:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Starscream on family guy Whats wrong with using the original transformers show to back up the claim that starscream was miscolored in that faily guy episode? I'm pretty sure that the starscreams depiction in the original show makes the trivia verifiable and the source reliable. Do I need to put a picture box within the article showing the two starscream side by side or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.59.249 (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC) The info you are trying to add is trivial and irrelevant. It has nothing to do with the subject of the article, a specific episode of Family Guy. The coloring process for animation has many variables, plus we have no way of knowing if the color settings on your television set are accurate. This piece of trivia just has no place in the encyclopedia. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC) If it's worth mentioning that Starscream appeared, its worth mentioning that he was miscolored as yellow and blue (that makes the character look more like Thundercracker) instead of red and gray, simple as that, its a description of its content that was presented incorrectly. Plus, I've seen hundreds or articles with "irrelevant" information that has lasted through many edits. Why should this be singled out. My television color settings were accurate, so it's not just me. Once again, I think it is alright to add this if I provide pictorial evidence within the article. (72.128.59.249 (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)) And, once again, I'm saying that that information is not relevant enough to the subject of the article to justify inclusion. If a reliable, secondary source (such as a media studies text or a newspaper) has reported on the issue then it would satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC) The Wife Aquatic I've rewritten the plot on the article now. I hope it reads better. In future you should be bold and just improve it yourself. Also try not to insult the work of other editors as you did in your edit summary. After all, a badly written plot summary is better than no summary at all! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Rosamund Hello Before you delete the info about Rosamund Grosvenor again , please search the internet and the relation with Vita sackville-west and Rosamund , she was the youth lover of Vita from 1898 till about 1913 when Vita Married if its on the wrong place please move it to an other part of this article please read it here http://www.amusejanetmason.com/Anita_Cornwell_Vita_Sackville_West.htm Kind Regards (Rosamund1888 (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) (16:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) Good hello. When removing the info you speak of I was making no judgment as to its accuracy, I am just a stickler for citing sources. Please take a look at the policies and guidelines for verifiability, reliable sources, and citing sources. As long as reliable, 3rd-party source (preferably academic) has published on the topic it should be ok. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 16:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC) please look here http://books.google.nl/books?id=oEdbAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&dq=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&lr= http://books.google.nl/books?id=DD1bAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&dq=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&lr= http://books.google.nl/books?id=LApoAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&dq=%22Rosamund+Grosvenor%22&lr= —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosamund1888 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC) sources Harold Nicolson: A Biography - Page 44 Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life - Page 411 Masterplots annual - Pagina 311 Portrait of a Marriage - Page 73 al about Rosamund and Vita if you want more let me know and its well known that she had an relation with Rosamund is all over the internet take a look the and you will see its in the books i say hope you can place it back after you checked the sources so its think its relaible and verifyable and check here http://www.glbtq.com/literature/sackvillewest_v.html http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/sackvill.htm http://www.gmax.co.za/think/history/2007/070305-vitasackvillewest.html do you want mre sources ?? (Rosamund1888 (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) someone wrote this to me Hi, I noticed you keep adding information to Vita Sackville-West which other editors then remove because it is unsourced. It's necessary, when editing Wikipedia, to show where you got your information from. Which should be easy enough-- you must be getting it from somewhere! Bear in mind that many websites don't qualify as Reliable sources; you're much better off getting your information from published books. As I recall, there was some information on Rosamund Grosvenor in Portrait of a Marriage, which, if that's where you're getting your information, is a perfectly good source. This page tells you how to reference your sources correctly; if you're having trouble, ask for help on the article's talk page. I'll post some more links below which you may find helpful. Good luck, and thanks for your work on Wikipedia! --Fullobeans (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC) (Rosamund1888 (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) im doing this all in good faith , but im so new to wiki much to learn , hope you can help me a bit want to make the article more complete (Rosamund1888 (talk) 21:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) No worries, your good faith was never in doubt. I think WP:CITE would be helpful to you. It contains all you need to know about citing sources, with templates for citing different types of media. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC) okay i look into that first , but do you think Portrait of a Marriage, is a good source ?? kind regards (82.75.183.126 (talk) 21:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)) i added longbarn , and i have an cite but cant see where to put it , here it is English Garden in Our Time: From Gertrude Jekyll to Geoffrey Jellicoe page 271 , hope you can place te source and about Rosamund = on Portrait of a Marriage page 73 and Masterplots annual on page 311-312 and V. Sackville-West: A Critical Biography page29 At the same time that Vita first met Harold, and was encouraging him to visit Knole, she began an intimate affair with her school friend, Rosamund Grosvenor During 1911 Harold Nicolson was becoming increasingly important in Vita's life, although she and Rosamund Grosvenor remained in love wiki had to many options for me hope we can work together or how to do it my self Kind Regards find a bit out about refs for the Rosamund part References Portrait of a Marriage Pepita Masterplots annual Vita and Virginia: The Work and Friendship of V. Sackville-West and Virginia Edward VII's Last Loves: Alice Keppel & Agnes Keyser can you put them in ?? (Rosamund1888 (talk) 09:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)) can you give me any advice on this Rosamund Mary Dorothy GROSVENOR She waas the daughter of Honourable Algernon Grosvenor (son of Robert Grosvenor , 1st Baron Ebury who was the son of the 1st Marquess of Westminster; the 1st Marquess was the grandfather of the 1st Duke of Westminster) by his wife Catherine Simeon (of the Baronets Simeon ). She was born on 5 sept 1888 and was killed by an flying bomb 30 june 1944 when she was working at the Savoy Chapel Meets Vita Sackville-West Among the other pupils at Miss Woolf's school had been Rosamund Grosvenor. Rosamund had regularly shared lessons with Vita at Knole, Vita fell in love with Rosamund. And at an early age Vita loved her more then she ever did Violet Trefusis. Vita's 1st real freind was Rosamund Grosvenor she was 4 years older then Vita , who was invited to cheer Vita up when her father was at the boer war. References Portrait of a Marriage Pepita Masterplots annual Vita and Virginia: The Work and Friendship of V. Sackville-West and Virginia Edward VII's Last Loves: Alice Keppel & Agnes Keyser ofcourse there's more to come Kind Regards (Rosamund1888 (talk) 10:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)) Why is L0b0t deleting Cultural References in Simpsons:The Wife Aquatic? Every single other Simpsons' episode has cultural references. Why are you picking on this one (the one I happen to be updating) to delete the cultural references? Are you going back through every episode and deleting them? Or are you just picking on the one I'm editing?71.100.0.127 (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC) What you added were not cultural references but things that are either already in the article (the Perfect Storm) or just a simple soundtrack listing. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Listen. I took the time to view 20+ episodes of the Simpsons and add valid Cultural References, consistent with the references already in EVERY SINGLE EPISODE page. I spent many hours wording and entering those. Now you take it upon yourself to decide that its not necessary. Well, you aren't pope of wikipedia. I read the guidelines and I'm well within them. What you are doing amounts to harassment and vandalism just to try to thwart my contributions. You've gone through everything I've done in the past week and reverted a good deal of it. Its abusive and idiotic. Knock it off. The articles are fine, they are informative, the info I've entered is valid and adds to the value of the article. To take it upon yourself to decide that Cultural References are no longer necessary when literally THOUSANDS of them exist on every Simpsons article is high-handed and arbitrary. I won't be bullied by you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.0.127 (talk) I'm sorry you feel like I am bullying you, I assure you that is not the case. You must however familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines at Wikipedia; particularly verifiability, reliable sources, writing about fiction, and writing about television episodes. If your edits conform to those criteria there should be no problem. As an aside, please don't call other editor's work vandalism, especially in your edit summaries, to do so violates our policies regarding personal attacks and assuming good faith and could lead to community sanction. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Muslim outrage Hey, good to see you in the AfD debate on Muslim outrage -- and that was a great comment on the song, too! Hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks, I am quite well and hope you are too. Cheers. L0b0t (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)