Jump to content

Pit bull: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 483: Line 483:
* [[List of dog fighting breeds]]
* [[List of dog fighting breeds]]
* {{cite book | last=Delise | first=Karen | title=The Pit Bull Placebo: The Media, Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression | year=2007 | month=July | publisher=Anubis Pub | location= | isbn=978-0972191418 }}
* {{cite book | last=Delise | first=Karen | title=The Pit Bull Placebo: The Media, Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression | year=2007 | month=July | publisher=Anubis Pub | location= | isbn=978-0972191418 }}
*{{cite book | last=Bullington | first=Barbara | title=Then Along Came Barney: The Story of a Dog Who Changed My Mind About Pit Bulls." | year=2009 | month=January | location=www.amazon.com | isbn=978-1440469152 }}


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 17:03, 18 February 2009

This article is about the group of breeds commonly called "Pit Bulls." For the specific breed from which the term is derived, see American Pit Bull Terrier or American Staffordshire Terrier.
Pitbulls redirects here, for the professional wrestling tag-team in ECW, see The Pitbulls
An American Pit Bull Terrier, one of several breeds often categorized as a Pit Bull
File:GhostNDarknss.jpg
A Staffordshire Bull Terrier, another breed often included in the Pit Bull Category

Pit Bull is a term commonly used to describe several breeds of dog in the Molosser family. The breeds most often placed in this category are the American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, and Staffordshire Bull Terrier.

In the media the term is vague and may include other breeds with similar physical characteristics, such as the Perro de Presa Canario, Cane Corso, Dogo Argentino, Alano Espanol, Japanese Tosa, Dogue de Bordeaux, Cordoba Fighting Dog, Alapaha Blue Blood Bulldog, American Bulldog, Boxer, Valley Bulldog, Olde English Bulldogge, Renascence Bulldogge, and Banter Bulldogge. These breeds are rarely listed by name in breed-specific legislation, but they are sometimes included when the term is defined broadly and based on physical appearance.[1]

History

The ancestors of modern Pit Bulls come from the bulldogs and terriers of England. At one time, every county in England had its own breed of terrier. Many of these still exist; however, some have evolved into new ones. Such is the case for the English White and the Black and Tan terriers, whose descendants include the bull-and-terriers, the Fox Terrier, and the Manchester Terrier. Terriers served an important purpose in England by killing vermin that might otherwise ruin crops, damage property, or spread disease such as the Black Plague. The development of sports such as rat- or badger-baiting further added to the breeds' importance.

United States poster used during World War I depicting a Pit Bull

Mastiff type dogs also have a long history in England; they are thought to have been brought by the Celts. It is also known that the Normans introduced the Alaunt. These dogs were used in battle and for guarding, but they also served utilitarian purposes, such as farm work. Specifically, these dogs accompanied farmers into the fields to assist with bringing bulls in for breeding, castration, or slaughter. The dogs, known generally as bulldogs, protected the farmer by subduing the bull if it attempted to gore him. Typically a dog would do this by biting the bull on the nose and holding on to the violently struggling bull despite injury. These traits permitted the development and rise of the bloody sports of bull-baiting and bear-baiting. In Elizabethan England, these spectacles were popular forms of entertainment, comparable to Shakespearean plays which often took place right next to the bearbaiting pits in Southwark. However, in 1835, bull-baiting and bear-baiting were abolished by Parliament as cruel, and the custom died out over the following years.

Dog fighting, which could be carried out under clandestine measures, blossomed. Since Bulldogs proved too ponderous and uninterested in dog fighting, the Bulldogs were crossed with English White and Black and Tan Terriers. They were also bred to be intelligent and level-headed during fights and remain non-aggressive toward their handlers. Part of the standard for organized dog-fighting required that the match referee who is unacquainted with the dog be able to enter the ring, pick up a dog while it was engaged in a fight, and get the respective owner to carry it out of the ring without being bitten. Dogs that bit the referee were culled.

As a result, Victorian fighting dogs (Staffordshire Bull Terriers and, though less commonly used as fighters, English Bull Terriers) generally had stable temperaments and were commonly kept in the home by the gambling men who owned them.

During the mid-1800s, immigration to the United States from Ireland and England brought an influx of these dogs to America, mainly to Boston, where they were bred to be larger and stockier, working as farm dogs in the West as much as fighting dogs in the cities. The resulting breed, also called the American Pit Bull Terrier, became known as an "all-American" dog. Pit Bull-type dogs became popular as family pets for citizens who were not involved in dog-fighting or farming. In the early 1900s they began to appear in films, one of the more famous examples being Pete the Pup from the Our Gang shorts (later known as The Little Rascals).

During World War I the breed's widespread popularity led to its being featured on pro-American propaganda posters. (see poster, left)

The Pit Bull is the only dog to have appeared on the cover of Life magazine three times.[2]

Stubby an American Pit Bull Terrier was the mascot and a member of 102nd infantry during World War I, Stubby was and is the most decorated war dog in history. Stubby was awarded the following medals for his bravery in combat: 3 Service Stripes, Yankee Division YD Patch, French Medal Battle of Verdun, 1st Annual American Legion Convention Medal Minneapolis, Minnesota Nov 1919, New Haven WW1 Veterans Medal, Republic of France Grande War Medal, St Mihiel Campaign Medal, Purple Heart, Chateau Thierry Campaign Medal, 6th Annual American Legion Convention.

Statistics about dog bites attributable to pit bulls are difficult to analyze because the term "Pit Bull" may be used to refer to other breeds. The differences in appearance which separate dog breeds are often hard to determine. Generally, dogs are categorized by differences in outward physical attributes. Recently, the decoding of the canine genome has allowed scientific testing to determine dog breeds, but this method is not yet widely used.[3] A 1999 City Journal article stated that "Pit bulls and pit-bull crosses (not always easy to distinguish) have caused more than a third of the nation's dog-bite fatalities since 1979 and a comparable proportion of serious injuries." [4]

A comprehensive study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that the pit bull breeds are the breed most often involved in fatal dog attacks in the U.S. Out of 238 dog bite deaths for which the breed was known from 1979 to 1998, 66 were caused by pit bull attacks (over 20%), more than any other breed.[5] There is no national recording system for non-fatal dog bites in the U.S.[6]

As pets

Pit Bulls - or dogs that appear to be Pit Bulls - make up a large portion of the population living in shelters across the United States, and may be put down due to the stigma associated with the various Pit Bull breeds (or because of overcrowding).[7]

Bans

Further information: Breed-specific legislation

This table shows places where Pit Bulls have been banned or where bans were proposed.

Global

Place Status Type Date banned Details
Ontario, Canada[8] ACTIVE Province August 29, 2005 Pit Bulls are not allowed to be imported into or brought through Ontario. Severe fines are in place for bringing new Pit Bulls into Ontario. Pit Bulls owned prior to August 29, 2005 are grandfathered in. This includes any Pit Bull born within 90 days of August 29, 2005. Any one who does not own a Pit Bulls on August 29, 2005 are allowed to obtain not more than one Grandfathered Pit Bull (by gift). All grandfathered Pit Bulls of over 36 weeks of age are required to be sterilized immediately. Grandfathered Pit Bulls must be muzzled and leashed on a leash of less than 1.8 metres while in public. Compliance of said terms were to be completed within 60 days of August 29, 2005. Sale of non-grandfathered Pit Bulls to residents of Ontario is illegal.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada[9] Active City 1990 Pit Bulls are not allowed to be in Winnipeg by law.
Australia Active Country March 10, 2006 Legislation and implementation dates varies across the different states, but here is the start of a list of the legislation in the various states: New South Wales,[10] Victoria,[11] Western Australia,[12] Queensland,[13] Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania.
France[14] Active Country April 30, 1999 Ownership restricted; non-pure-breed animals resembling pit-bulls are to be surgically neutered
Norway Active Country 1991
Iceland Active Country 1995
Singapore Active
Ecuador[15] Active Country February 3, 2009
United Kingdom[16] Active Country August 12, 1991 Specific breeds and similar cross-breeds banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
Denmark Active Country Banned alongside the Tosa in 1991 along with any non-pure-bred dog where either of the races are among the parent or grandparent animals
New Zealand Active Country Must be microchipped, muzzled in public, and cannot be publicly advertised for sale
The Netherlands Cancelled Country 1993 On June 9, 2008 Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality Gerda Verburg announced the ban on Pitbulls will be canceled before the end of the year. The reason for this was that there was no reduction of biting incidents with dogs since Pit Bulls were banned. The ban was installed in 1993 after three biting incidents where three children were killed.[17] New rules will no longer select on breed or Molosser looks but require a behavior test for any large dog that shows signs of aggression[18]
Serbia Active Most of the Country 200? Pitbulls are banned and all other breeds must be muzzled and leashed in public and the owners must pay an annual fee for any injuries caused by these dogs.
Italy Active All Country 200? Pitbulls and other breeds such as Rottweilers must be muzzled and leashed in public and the owners must pay an annual fee for any injuries caused by these dogs.

United States

Place Status Region Date Details
Sioux City, IA Active County September 15, 2008 Pit bulls ban ordinance passed on September 15, 2008 http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2008/09/16/news/local/79377d0e6eca4c9f862574c600111a35.txt
Livingston County, Michigan Active County May 20, 2008 All "bully breeds" (American Staffordshire Terriers, Bull Terriers, Pit Bulls, and American Bull Dogs)
Delta, Utah[19] Active City
Independence, Missouri Active City 2006
Overland Park, Kansas Active City
Springville, Utah[20] Active City
Miami-Dade County, Florida[21] Active County 1989 Section 5 Code 17: "It is illegal in Miami-Dade County to own any dog which substantially conforms to a Pit Bull breed dog, unless it was specially registered with Miami-Dade County prior to 1989. Acquisition or keeping of a Pit Bull dog: $500.00 fine and County Court action to force the removal of the animal from Miami-Dade County."
Council Bluffs, Iowa[22] Active City 2004
Royal City, Washington[23] Active City January 12, 2007
Denver, Colorado[24] Active City 9 May 2005 First banned in 1980s, but later revoked
Prince George's County, Maryland[25] Active County 1996
Springfield, Missouri[26] Active City april 13, 2006
Oklahoma[27] Proposed State June 21, 2005
Shelbyville, Tennessee[28] Proposed City November 18, 2006
Aurora, Colorado[29] Proposed City September 27, 2005
Youngstown, Ohio[30] Active City January 10, 1999 due to the illegal dog fighting / see for OHIO http://www.pittiesplace.com/BSLinOhio.htm
Richland, Washington[23] Proposed City December 21, 2006
Tupelo, Mississippi[31] Proposed City September 28, 2006
Parker, Colorado[32] Proposed City January 17, 2006
Chicago, Illinois[33] Proposed City November 17, 2005
Enumclaw, Washington Active City
Garfield Heights, Ohio Active City October 24, 2007 60 days in jail and or $1,000 fine if owner does not comply with city law.
Sparta, Tennessee Active City
Melvindale, Michigan[34] Active City April 4, 1990 $100.00 fine or 30 days in jail.
Union County, Kentucky Active County January 1, 2008 It is illegal to breed "pit bulls" and anyone who owns a "pit bull" inside county lines must register it as a vicious animal with the county clerks office. Owners must also have them fixed. And if owners keep pets outdoors they have to be kept in a Kennel with a concrete floor and on a chain.
Wheeling, West Virginia Active City Jan. 17, 2006 Pit Bull Owners must register their dog. Must have liability insurance to own a Pit Bull. Must also have a 6 foot high fence to allow dog in yard without leash. When walking your dog you must have a muzzle on it as well as a leash no longer than 6 feet.
Kearney, Missouri Active City

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published a study concerning deaths from canine attacks in 2000.[35] According to the study, between 1979 and 1998, one-third of all fatal dog attacks were caused by Pit Bull type dogs. The highest number of attacks (118) were by Pit Bull type dogs, the next highest being Rottweilers at 67.[36]

A followup to the study published in 2000 by Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association suggested that "generic non–breed-specific, dangerous dog laws can be enacted that place primary responsibility for a dog’s behavior on the owner, regardless of the dog’s breed. In particular, targeting chronically irresponsible dog owners may be effective."[37]

Attributes and Misconceptions

Locking jaws

According to Dr. I. Brisbin, a senior researcher with the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of South Carolina, Pit Bulls do not have a "locking jaw" mechanism:[38]

The few studies which have been conducted of the structure of the skulls, mandibles and teeth of Pit Bulls show that, in proportion to their size, their jaw structure and thus its inferred functional morphology, is no different from that of any breed of dog. There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of any kind of 'locking mechanism' unique to the structure of the jaw and/or teeth of the American Pit Bull Terrier.

[39]

A variant of the "locking jaw" story is told by Tom Skeldon, Lucas County (Ohio), dog warden, who said that an impounded Pit Bull that had been used in fighting started "going wild," biting at the walls of the kennel.[40] He shot the dog with a tranquilizer, and then left it for five minutes to let it pass out. When he came back the dog had indeed passed out, but not before it had leaped up and clamped its jaws on a cable used to open the door of the kennel. "Everything else was relaxed, the dog was out cold, but its jaws wouldn't let go of that cable, and he was hanging in midair," said Skeldon. "Not even a jaguar will do that."

However, an incident reported by the Associated Press suggests that other breeds may also fail to relax their jaws when they become unconscious. An Albuquerque police officer was attacked, in October 2005, by a Belgian Malinois, a dog used for herding and police work, with no significant commonality with "Pit Bulls." The dog bit the officer on the arm. When the officer couldn't shake free, she shot the dog, killing it. Still, other officers had to come to her aid, and pry the dead dog's jaws off the officer's arm.

Pepper spray or other pain when attacking

Pit Bulls are often not affected by capsaicin-based dog-repellent sprays. Many other dog breeds also display this resistance to pepper spray when they are attacking. Documented cases include Bull Mastiffs, Rottweilers and many German Shepherds (including Police K-9s).[41] In the words of two police officers, it is "not unusual for pepper spray not to work on dogs"[42] and "just as OC spray doesn't work on all humans, it won't work on all canines."[43]

Insurance problems

Many homeowners' insurance companies in the United States are reluctant to insure owners of dogs that are considered to be a dangerous breed. Allstate (depending on the state) may not insure homes with Pit Bulls or even Boxers, Akitas, Chow Chows, Dobermans, Rottweilers, or wolf hybrids.[44] The Automobile Club of Southern California will refuse to provide homeowner's insurance if a dog living in the home "looks like a Pit Bull".[45] The CDC estimates that 4.7 million people were bitten by dogs in 1994. By analyzing data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP), the CDC determined that 368,245 persons were treated in U.S. hospitals for nonfatal dog bites in 2001, and that approximately 2% of the U.S. population are attacked by dogs per year. These attacks most often occur on the owner's property.[46]

Some insurance companies have taken a compromise position, and will only insure Pit Bull owners if their dogs have achieved a Canine Good Citizen award.[47]

Breed specific legislation (BSL)

In response to a number of well-publicized incidents involving dogs that resemble Pit Bulls, some jurisdictions began placing restrictions on the ownership of Pit Bulls, such as the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 in the UK, an example of breed-specific legislation. Many jurisdictions have outlawed the possession of Pit Bulls, either Pit Bull breeds specifically, or in addition to other breeds that are regarded as dangerous. The DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs) office explains why Pit Bulls are prohibited in Great Britain; "The prohibited types were all considered to have been bred specifically to be fighting dogs. Organised dog fighting is illegal in Great Britain. Under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 other types of dogs can be added to the prohibited list by Order in Council."[48]

A muzzled Pit Bull.

Pit Bull Terriers are regulated in the United Kingdom under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, administered by the government agency DEFRA. It is illegal to own any of these dogs without a specific exemption from a court. Licensing is done by local governments, dogs must be muzzled and kept on a leash in public, they must be registered and insured, and receive microchip implants. In November 2002, The Princess Royal was fined £500 under the provisions of the Act.

The Canadian province of Ontario, on August 29, 2005 enacted a ban on Pit Bulls. It was the first province or state in North America to do so.[49] The breeds listed in the ban[50] can no longer be sold, bred, or imported and all Pit Bull owners must leash and muzzle their Pit Bulls in public. A 60 day grace period has been put in place to allow for owners to have their Pit Bulls spayed or neutered.[51] Also it left a period to allow municipalities to adjust to the new law. Prior to the bill's passage, the Ontario government cited what it deemed the success of a Pit Bull bylaw passed by Winnipeg, Manitoba.[52] In October 2008, the Ontario Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to the law and re-affirmed its legality.[53]

As early as 1921, courts have upheld breed specific ordinances in municipalities as a legitimate exercise of police power.[54] These have not been without their Constitutional challenges. A 1991 Colorado Supreme Court case outlines the basic arguments against Pit Bull specific legislation. It incorporated cases from Arkansas, Ohio, New Mexico, Florida, et al. and several federal district courts, which upheld similar statutes. The case has become federal precedent for what classifies a constitutionally acceptable definition of a "Pit Bull" when the statute cites the United Kennel Club as the standard for defining the characteristics of the breed.[55] The Constitutional issues raised by the case cover the quintessential arguments against Pit Bull targeted legislation.

In Colorado Dog Fanciers, Inc. v. City and County of Denver,[56] the Supreme Court of Colorado reviewed en banc claims that the 1989 "Pit Bulls prohibited" city ordinance was unconstitutional. The ordinance made it:

unlawful for any person to 'own, possess, keep, exercise control over, maintain, harbor, transport, or sell within the City any Pit Bull.' § 8-55(a). The ordinance permitted an owner of a previously licensed Pit Bull to keep the dog only if the owner (1) annually renewed a 'Pit Bull license' (2) proved that the dog had been spayed or neutered and had been vaccinated against rabies, (3) kept the dog confined or securely leashed and muzzled, and (4) maintained $100,000 in liability insurance. § 8-55(d).

The ordinance defined a Pit Bull as:

Any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying a majority of physical traits of any one or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds.

The trial court held that the ordinance on its face was unconstitutional as a violation of due process rights because it placed the burden of proof on the dog owner that his animal was not a Pit Bull for purposes of the ordinance. Furthermore, the trial court severed the licensing requirement as lacking a rational basis. It judicially modified the ordinance and ordered a 120 day notice to affected owners to comply with the provisions of the modification. Both parties appealed the decision.

Petitioners opposed to the ordinance made several constitutional challenges:

  • Owners were not afforded sufficient due process when the animal would be impounded for an alleged violation of the ordinance
  • Ordinance violated due process rights by creating a legislative presumption of criminal culpability of knowingly and voluntarily possessing a Pit Bull
  • Ordinance violated due process rights by permitting a finding that an animal fell within the definition of a Pit Bull without expert testimony
  • Ordinance was vague and overbroad for treating all Pit Bulls and substantially similar breeds as inherently dangerous
  • Ordinance violated Constitutional guarantees of Equal Protection under the law by targeting Pit Bull owners while omitting owners of other presumably dangerous breeds

The Supreme Court rejected each of these claims. It found that Pit Bull owners as a class were not constitutionally suspect when identified in a statute (as opposed to race, ethnicity, and natural origin). Furthermore, the ownership of an animal was not a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, but a liberty interest to be safeguarded. Consequently, the court required only a rational basis test for the constitutionality of the ordinance. It held that state police power held a "significant state interest" in public safety and welfare, and that regulation of dogs was a proper exercise of that power.[57] The court adopted the trial court findings that, "Pit Bull attacks, unlike attacks by other dogs, occur more often, are more severe, and are more likely to result in fatalities. The trial court also found that Pit Bulls tend to be stronger than other dogs, often give no warning signals before attacking, and are less willing than other dogs to retreat from an attack, even when they are in considerable pain."[58] However, the court did not cite any scientific sources for this legal conclusion.

The Supreme Court did affirm the lower court's ruling that the burden should fall to the state in proving whether an owner's dog was a "Pit Bull" for purposes of the ordinance. Given the case's federal citations for due process claims, this is particularly significant to those statutes of other states which place the burden on the owner in contrast to the Colorado ruling. Pit Bull owners facing prosecution who hold the burden of proof for their dog could challenge the statute on due process grounds under the reasoning in Colorado Dog Fanciers.

The Colorado case did not address expert findings that specific breeds should not be banned from municipalities. Other jurisdictions have deferred the weighing of scientific evidence to the legislature, but do not accept expert testimony to the contrary if the legislature has a "rational basis for public health and safety."[59]

Subsequent to this ruling, a 2004 law passed by the Colorado General Assembly now prohibits breed specific laws. The city of Denver challenged the law on the basis of home rule wherein the city's charter could supersede state law if the issue was to be considered as "local" as opposed to that of a mixed concern, or statewide concern. The district court (not the Colorado Supreme Court) said that there was no new evidence to change its ruling on the Dog Fancier's Case and that it was a local issue. The court refused to allow evidence in which was given to the Colorado Legislature when they passed HB 04-1279 previously. Therefore, the Denver ordinance was reinstated. Over 260 "Pit Bull type" dogs have been seized from their homes and euthanised since this date, resulting in national protest by dog owners and animal rights lobbying groups.[60] Since 1989, Denver authorities have confiscated and destroyed over 1100 Pit Bulls from city residents who have violated the ordinance. Dog owners continue to bring Pit Bulls into the city.

No such ban on other dogs deemed dangerous has been enacted.[61]

Ohio became the first state jurisdiction to find its breed specific legislation unconstitutional on due process grounds. In Toledo v. Tellings (March 3, 2006), a 2-1 decision, the Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals struck down breed specific legislation that restricted Pit Bull ownership in Toledo, Ohio. The law had relied on a state definition of a vicious dog as one that has bitten or killed a human, has killed another dog, or "belongs to a breed that is commonly known as a Pit Bull dog." The court held that the legislation was void for violation of a Pit Bull owner's right to due process, because the owner could not appeal a designation of his pet as a vicious dog. For the majority, Judge William Skow wrote:[62] "Since we conclude that there is no evidence that Pit Bulls are inherently dangerous or vicious, then the city ordinance limitation on ownership is also arbitrary, unreasonable, and discriminatory." The court found no rational basis for the law. The case went before the Ohio Supreme Court and a final determination was made that overruled the 6th District Appellate decision. Mr. Tellings has appealed the case to the SCOTUS (Dec, 2007) and is awaiting a decision on hearing.[63]

The State of Virginia now has Anti-BSL laws prohibiting cities and counties from banning a dog of certain breed or cross breed.

The State of Florida, Statute 767.14[64] forbids local governments in Florida from enacting breed specific laws unless the law was in place before October 1, 1990. Several communities, including Miami-Dade County, Florida had such laws in place before the law took effect and Pit Bull ownership is banned there.

In Vanater v. Village of S. Point, the Ohio federal district court held that the village criminal ordinance prohibiting the owning or harboring of pit bull terriers within the village limits was not overbroad & was rationally related to the village's duty to protect the safety of its citizens. Also, the court determined the village showed that pit bull terriers are uniquely dangerous & therefore, are proper subjects of the village's police power for the protection of the public's health & welfare. Pit Bulls also possess the quality of gameness, which is not a totally clear concept, but which can be described as the propensity to catch and maul an attacked victim unrelentingly until death occurs, or as the continuing tenacity and tendency to attack repeatedly for the purpose of killing. It is clear that the unquantifiable, unpredictable aggressiveness and gameness of Pit Bulls make them uniquely dangerous. Pit Bulls have the following distinctive behavioral characteristics: a) grasping strength, b) climbing and hanging ability, c) weight pulling ability, d) a history of frenzy, which is the trait of unusual relentless ferocity or the extreme concentration on fighting and attacking, e) a history of catching, fighting, and killing instinct, f) the ability to be extremely destructive and aggressive, g) highly tolerant of pain, h) great biting strength, i) undying tenacity and courage and they are highly unpredictable. While these traits, tendencies or abilities are not unique to Pit Bulls exclusively, Pit Bulls will have these instincts and phenotypical characteristics; most siginficantly, such characteristics can be latent and may appear without warning or provocation. The breeding history of Pit Bulls makes it impossible to rule out a violent propensity for any one dog as gameness and aggressiveness can be hidden for years. Given the Pit Bull's genetical physical strengths and abilities, a Pit Bull always poses the possibility of danger; given the Pit Bull's breeding history as a fighting dog and the latency of its aggressiveness and gameness, the Pit Bull poses a danger distinct from other breeds of dogs which do not so uniformly share those traits. While Pit Bulls are not the only breed of dog which can be dangerous or vicious, it is reasonable to single out the breed to anticipate and avoid the dangerous aggressiveness which may be undetectable in a Pit Bull. http://www.animallaw.info/cases/caus717fsupp1236.htm

Debate

The extent to which banning a particular breed is effective in reducing dog bite fatalities is contested. Some people maintain that Pit Bull attacks are directly attributable to irresponsible owners[citation needed], rather than to any inherent defect in the breed itself. Other people believe that the Pit Bull Terrier is a breed that, although not inherently dangerous, needs a particularly knowledgeable and committed handler and should not be freely available to novice owners.

Pit Bulls are said to be popular with irresponsible owners, who see these dogs as a symbol of status or machismo.[65] This type of owner may be less likely to socialize, train, or desex their pet. It is known that unneutered male dogs account for a disproportionate amount of all fatal dog attacks. Some say that many of those who do not believe in altering male dogs also believe that having and training an aggressive dog "goes with the territory," [citation needed] so to speak. Irresponsible ownership can have a great impact on how a breed is represented in attack statistics [citation needed].

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which maintains the United States' database on fatal wounds inflicted by dog bites, does not advocate breed-specific legislation, instead encouraging "Dangerous Dog" laws that focus on individual dogs of any breed that have exhibited aggressive behavior.[66] The CDC study is also admittedly flawed due to a large number of dog breeds being unknown when the study was compiled. It bears mentioning that using newspaper reports as evidence is hardly the most valid data available.

Huntsville, Alabama police raided a dog-fighting arena on 28 February 2002 and seized 10 Pit Bulls. The city's attempt to legally euthanize four Pit Bull puppies, never trained to fight, was stopped by Madison County Circuit Court Judge Joe Battle, who ruled that the Pit Bull puppies were not dangerous by virtue of their genetics alone (AP Wire; 6 April 2002).

Huntsville appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court, which affirmed (City of Huntsville v. Sheila Tack et al., 1010459, S.C. Alabama; 30 August 2002) the Circuit Court opinion by a 6-2 vote; the written dissent addressed procedural matters of legal status of the parties, not the nature of the dogs. The puppies were adopted. Animal Rights group PETA sent the Judge a letter calling for the execution of all the pups. Ingrid Newkirk, president of PETA, officially advocates the euthanasia of pitbull dogs brought in to animal shelters, as well as a ban on their breeding.[67] PETA's position on dog breeding in general is that it is an unnecessary practice, and is not limited to pitbulls.[68]

American Airlines banned "Rottweilers, Doberman Pinschers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Bull Terriers, American Pit Bull Terriers, and any mixed breeds containing one or more of those breeds" in August of 2002 following an incident involving an American Pit Bull Terrier puppy that escaped from luggage into the cargo hold of an airliner, causing damage to the cargo hold. The American Kennel Club lobbied the airline to lift the restriction, arguing that the incident was merely one of improper restraint, and could have involved any dog breed.

The restriction was lifted in May 2003 after a compromise was reached that requires portable dog carriers in the cargo hold to employ releasable cable ties on four corners of the door of the carrier.

Dog fights

Pit Bulls are sometimes used for dog fights, due to their strength, courage and widespread availability. Fight training means using other dogs of the same sex, as most dogs will not show aggression towards the opposite sex.

Although dog fighting is illegal in the United States, it is still practiced, and is sometimes accompanied by gambling. Dog fighting is unlawful in all fifty states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. In the Commonwealth of Virginia, for example, it is a felony to organize, promote, be employed by, or wager on a dogfight, whether one is physically present at the fight or not. In addition there is a federal law making interstate dog fighting activities a felony.

Media coverage

Positive press

Some work in hospitals and care facilities as certified therapy dogs, many are well-loved family pets, and some have even saved people's lives. There are many instances of Pit Bulls being productively employed by U.S. Customs,[69] as police K9s.[70]

Pit Bulls have been reported in the news media as "adopting" other species of animals, such as kittens (fig. 1). This is one possible origin of the breed nickname "nanny dog".[71] However, it is more widely accepted that the "nanny dog" nickname comes from Pit Bull-type dogs' innate love and tolerance of children.[citation needed]

A rescued Pit Bull called Popsicle is a United States Customs dog, and is famous for sniffing out one of the biggest cocaine busts in history.[72]

Dakota and Tahoe were certified pit bull search and rescue dogs who participated in over 200 search efforts for lost and missing people including such high profile search efforts as the search for Laci Peterson and the recovery efforts of the astronauts who lost their lives in the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Because of their heroic work the two pit bulls have been featured on Animal Planet, National Geographic, and have received countless awards.[73]

In February, 2006, New Yorker magazine writer Malcolm Gladwell published an article surveying the research on Pit Bulls which concluded that legal attempts to ban the breed were both crude and unnecessary.[74]

In February 2007 a Pit Bull named "Chief" rescued his owner's family from a spitting cobra by dashing in front of the attacking snake and taking the deadly bite himself. Chief subdued the snake but died of the venom 30 minutes later.[75]

In April 2007, columnist John Canzano of The Oregonian newspaper wrote a favorable piece on Hollywood, the Pit Bull that formerly belonged to NBA player Qyntel Woods.[76] Hollywood, renamed Stella, was adopted by a loving owner and reformed from a fighting dog to a lap dog.

Nearly fifty Pit Bulls were seized from Michael Vick's dogfighting operation in 2007. Of those dogs, one was euthanized because of aggression issues. About half were sent to Best Friends Animal Society, a Utah animal sanctuary, where they are receiving care and behavioral training. The others, which were behaviorally evaluated as being suitable candidates for adoption, went to various other groups. Bay Area Doglovers Responsible About Pit Bulls (BAD RAP), transported thirteen of these dogs in an RV across the United States to Oakland, California, where they were placed in adoptive and foster homes.[77] BAD RAP detailed the timeline of the dogs progress, from initial evaluations to fostering and adoption, on its website.[78]

Famous owners

Template:Globalize/US

  • Jonathan Davis from Korn appears walking a pit bull in the video for "Got the Life".
  • Daddy is a "pack member" of Cesar Millan's Dog Psychology Center. Hip hop artist Redman, Daddy’s original owner, gave the four-month-old puppy to Cesar.[97]
  • Pete the Pup ("Petey") from The Little Rascals series of films
  • The grindcore band Caninus features pit bulls as "vocalists"
  • In the movie, Flashdance, lead character Alexandra "Alex" Owens (played by Jennifer Beals) owns a pit bull named Grunt.
  • Jennifer Lopez has a pit bull in her "I'm Glad" video, the narrative of which is based on the film Flashdance.
  • Veronica Mars, the title character in the CW television show, has a pit bull named Backup.
  • On the cover of Weird Al Yankovic's "Straight Out of Lynwood" is a pit bull which he borrowed from a nearby couple.
  • Rapper Snoop Dogg featured a pit bull puppy in the music video for his single "Drop It Like It's Hot."
  • Rapper Armando Christian Perez is known by his stage name "pitbull".
  • Boys Like Girls have a three-legged pit bull in their "Great Escape" video.
  • Rapper Eve frequently refers to herself on record as "a pit bull in a skirt."
  • At the 2008 Republican National Convention in Minnesota, on Wednesday, September 3, 2008, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, (then-presumptive) Republican vice-presidential nominee, famously said during her acceptance speech, "I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town. I was just your average hockey mom and signed up for the PTA. I love those hockey moms. You know, they say the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick."

See also

  • Capp, Dawn (2004). American Pit Bull Terriers, Fact or Fiction. Doral Publishing, Inc. ISBN 0-9745407-1-4. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  • Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
  • List of dog fighting breeds
  • Delise, Karen (2007). The Pit Bull Placebo: The Media, Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression. Anubis Pub. ISBN 978-0972191418. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  • Bullington, Barbara (2009). Then Along Came Barney: The Story of a Dog Who Changed My Mind About Pit Bulls.". www.amazon.com. ISBN 978-1440469152. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

References

  1. ^ Ohio's legal definition of "Pit Bull"
  2. ^ "A LIFE Magazine "Dog" Gallery". Heraldsquarehotel.com. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  3. ^ Dog genes tell surprising tales
  4. ^ Scared of Pit Bulls? You’d Better Be!
  5. ^ Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998
  6. ^ About CDC Bite Stats
  7. ^ "Overpopulation". Pit Bull Rescue San Diego. Retrieved 22 August 2007]. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  8. ^ "Ontario moves to ban Pit Bulls". CBC News. October 15, 2004. Retrieved 2007-07-29.
  9. ^ "CBC Marketplace: Dangerous Dogs". Cbc.ca. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  10. ^ Restricted Dogs
  11. ^ City of Melbourne - Pets and animal management - Restricted-breed dogs
  12. ^ "City of Mandurah - Restricted Dog Breeds". Mandurah.wa.gov.au. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  13. ^ Restricted Breeds
  14. ^ Rural code, articles L211-11 to L211-28 and ministerial decision from April 30, 1999
  15. ^ Redacción Web. "El Telégrafo | Perros Pitbull y Rottweiler ya no podrán tenerse como mascotas". Telegrafo.com.ec. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  16. ^ UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs - Dangerous Dogs Act, 1991 and Amendment, 1997
  17. ^ "Dutch government to lift 25-year ban on pit bulls". Asia.news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2008-12-25.
  18. ^ Dutch newssite mentioning the end of the Pit Bull ban on june 9, 2008
  19. ^ "Welcome to Delta City, Utah's Official Web Site!". Deltautah.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  20. ^ Microsoft Word - Title 3.doc
  21. ^ Miami-Dade County Online Services. "Miami-Dade County - Animal Services". Miamidade.gov. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  22. ^ "Chapter 4.20 ANIMAL CONTROL". Municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  23. ^ a b [1][dead link]
  24. ^ POSTED: 2:18 pm MDT May 9, 2005. "Pit Bulls Banned Again In Denver - Denver News Story - KMGH Denver". Thedenverchannel.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ wjz.com - Prince George's County Pit Bull Ban Upheld[dead link]
  26. ^ City of Springfield, MO - Bills & Ordinances[dead link]
  27. ^ State Lawmaker Proposes Ban of Pit Bull Dogs[dead link]
  28. ^ Confehr, Clint (2006-11-18). "Shelbyville Times-Gazette: Story: Proposed Pit Bull ban draws support". T-g.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  29. ^ POSTED: 9:59 am MDT September 27, 2005. "Aurora's Proposed Pit Bull Ban Loses Some Of Its Bark - Denver News Story - KMGH Denver". Thedenverchannel.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ "Owners fight proposed Pit Bull ban - and win". Post-gazette.com. 1999-01-10. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  31. ^ http://network.bestfriends.org/mississippi/news/8009.html
  32. ^ POSTED: 6:25 pm MST January 17, 2006. "Parker May Scrap Pit Bull Ban, Beef Up Dangerous Dog Law - Health News Story - KMGH Denver". Thedenverchannel.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  33. ^   By Andy Shaw (2005-11-17). "abc7chicago.com: Chicago considers banning Pit Bulls 11/17/05". Abclocal.go.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  34. ^ [2][dead link]
  35. ^ http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf
  36. ^ at pages 838-839.
  37. ^ "Dog-Bite-Related Fatalities -United States, 1995-1996". Center for Disease Control. 1997-05-30. Retrieved 2006-12-15. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  38. ^ Toledo v. Tellings, Slip Copy, 2006 WL 513946
  39. ^ Toledo v. Tellings, Slip Copy, Paragraph 25, 2006 WL 513946
  40. ^ "Dogs' Blood Brings Big Bucks - Articles - From Animal Defenders of Westchester - We advocate on all animal protection and exploitation issues, including experimentation, factory farming, rodeos, breeders and traveling animal acts". All-creatures.org. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  41. ^ http://www.policek9.com/html/oc.html
  42. ^ "New Zealand, world, sport, business & entertainment news on". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  43. ^ [3][dead link]
  44. ^ "Washington Bill Asks Insurers to Consider Dogs' Deeds, not their Breeds". Insurancejournal.com. 2005-03-18. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  45. ^ Confidential communication from ACSC adjuster in Pasadena, CA office.
  46. ^ "Nonfatal Dog Bite-Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments - United States, 2001". Cdc.gov. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  47. ^ "American Kennel Club - Homeowners Insurance Available to Breeds Previously Excluded with CGC Certification". Akc.org. 2004-10-01. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  48. ^ http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/domestic/ddogsleaflet.pdf
  49. ^ [4][dead link]
  50. ^ [5][dead link]
  51. ^ "Pit bull owners protest looming Ontario ban". CTV.ca. 2005-08-29. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  52. ^ "Ministère du Procureur général - LE GOUVERNEMENT MCGUINTY VA INTERDIRE LES PIT-BULLS". Attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  53. ^ Ontario appeals court upholds ban on pit bulls
  54. ^ See McQueen v. Kittitas County, 115 Wash. 672 (1921)
  55. ^ See the 2007 federal court decision in Coalition of Human Advocates for K9's and Owners v. City and County of San Francisco, 2007 WL 641197 (N.D.Cal. 27 February 2007) citing descriptions outlined by the UKC as the standard
  56. ^ 820 P.2d 644, Colo., 1991
  57. ^ See Colorado Dog Fanciers, Inc. v. City and County of Denver (820 P.2d 644, at 652, Colo.,1991), Justice ERICKSON delivering opinion of the court
  58. ^ See Ibid at 652, see also the 2004 federal case Warboys v. Proulx, 303 F.Supp.2d 111 FN13 (D.Conn., 2004), "the Pit Bull poses a danger distinct from other breeds of dogs which do not so uniformly share those traits"
  59. ^ See Holt v. City of Maumelle, 817 S.W.2d 208 (Ark.,1991)
  60. ^ "Critics assail Denver's pit bull ban". Usatoday.Com. 2005-07-20. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  61. ^ Acevedo, Hector. "Denver Daily News". Thedenverdailynews.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  62. ^ [6]
  63. ^ "toledoblade.com". toledoblade.com. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  64. ^ "Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes". flsenate.gov. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  65. ^ "UK | Dog control laws and Pit Bulls". BBC News. 2007-09-11. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  66. ^ Centers for Disease Control. "Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998", 2000.
  67. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. "Controlling an animal as deadly as a weapon", San Francisco Chronicle, June 8, 2005.
  68. ^ PETA. [7]. Retrieved September 15, 2007.
  69. ^ "ABC News: Protecting the Nation - One Sniff at a Time". Abcnews.go.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  70. ^ "Saving pit bulls / Owners working to overcome the breed's image say the dogs' behavior depends on their treatment". Sfgate.com. 2001-07-30. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  71. ^ "Mutt-ernal Instincts - Dachshund adopts kitties, Pitbull adopts kitties, Border Collie adopts... tigers? - 2006-09-29". Dogsinthenews.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  72. ^ "U.S. Customs Today - October 2002 - Kool K-9 Popsicle retires". Cbp.gov. 2005-09-28. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  73. ^ For Pits' Sake
  74. ^ "gladwell dot com - troublemakers". Malcolmgladwell.com. 2006-02-06. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  75. ^ "Pit Bull saves 2 women from deadly cobra, dies wagging his tail - 2007-03-01". Dogsinthenews.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  76. ^ What happened to Qyntel's Pit Bull?
  77. ^ "From fighters to friends, Vick's Pit Bulls learn new life". CNN. Retrieved 2008-01-27.
  78. ^ "A Second Chance for the Vick-tims". BAD RAP. Retrieved 2008-01-27.
  79. ^ "All About Pit Bulls". Trupitbull.com. 1999-04-26. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  80. ^ "Pit Bull Breed History - Pitbull". Pitbull411.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  81. ^ a b c "Cesar Millan - Features". Cesarmillaninc.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  82. ^ http://popsugar.com/213575
  83. ^ Michael J. Fox owns a Pit Bull named Burnaby
  84. ^ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20061001/ai_n16761085
  85. ^ Jessica Biel Adopts—Again. U.S. magazine: Star. June 18, 2007. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)Page 27: "The 25-year-old brunette cutie just adopted her third Pit Bull."
  86. ^ "The Puparazzi". Thepuparazzi.blogspot.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  87. ^ Rachel Bilson. "Rachel Bilson Biography". People.com. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  88. ^ [8][dead link]
  89. ^ "Print this Article: Glass on glass". Advocate.com. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  90. ^ "Jesse James - Yahoo! TV". Tv.yahoo.com. 1969-04-19. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  91. ^ "Rachael Ray - Biography". Rachaelraymag.com. 1968-08-25. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  92. ^ "SSS Archive Three". Sss.jonstewart.net. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  93. ^ "Jon Stewart Intelligence Agency - Biography". Jonstewart.net. Retrieved 2009-02-04.
  94. ^ Dead Game, from Born Bad, (collection of shorter works) by Andrew Vachss. Vintage, 1994.
  95. ^ "Dogs of The Zero - Honey & Pokey: The Zero 5.0laf - The Official Website of Andrew Vachss". Vachss.com. 2001-07-30. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  96. ^ The American Pit Bull Registry. "American Pit Bull Registry is everything Pit Bull - Pit Bull history and heritage". Pitbullregistry.com. Retrieved 2009-02-02.
  97. ^ "Cesar Millan - Pack Profiles". Cesarmillaninc.com. Retrieved 2009-02-04.

Further reading

  • Karen, Delise (2002). Fatal Dog Attacks: The Stories Behind the Statistics. Anubis Pub. ISBN 0-9721914-0-2. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Dawn, Capp (2004). Underdogs: dogs under fire: The Truth About Pit Bulls. Doral Publishing. ISBN 0-9745407-1-4. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Delise, Karen (2007). The Pit Bull Placebo: The Media, Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression. Anubis Pub. ISBN 978-0972191418. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Government sites

Documentaries

  • A Little Vicious - Immy Humes's American tragicomedy about a pitbull on death row
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pit_bull&oldid=271602086"