User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:05, 14 June 2012

		The Purple Heart Barnstar
		Za całokształt. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus\| talk to me} 20:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zips

I moved the Spiš site to Zips (region) and you reversed the change stating that you are not sure if this is a region. Please note that it is indeed the english name for the slovak "Spiš" region. I did provide numerous academic texts in english confirming this. I will post them here just to make sure you have them. Please move it back to "Zips (region)" on grounds that:

An english title exists for this topic
English spelling is preferred to that of non-English languages
The spelling that reflects the majority of items on the page is preferred to less common alternatives.

Central European History , Vol. 15, No. 3 (Sep., 1982), pp. 266-296 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4545962

Czechoslovakia during the War: III—Slovakia and Ruthenia

J. R. Bulletin of International News , Vol. 21, No. 25 (Dec. 9, 1944), pp. 1047-1054 Published by: Royal Institute of International Affairs Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25643728

Education in Slovakia

Anton Štefánek The Slavonic Review , Vol. 2, No. 5 (Dec., 1923), pp. 308-327 Published by: the Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4201732

Mining and German Settlement in Slovakia, an Historical Summary

Helmut Schröcke GeoJournal , Vol. 32, No. 2, In Commemoration of Georgius Agricola, 1494–1555 (February 1994), pp. 127-135 Published by: Springer Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41146718

Beiträge zur bairischen und ostfränkischen Dialektologie: Ergebnisse der Zweiten Bayerisch-Österreichischen Dialektologentagung Wien, 27. bis 30. September 1983 by Peter Wiesinger

Review by: Herbert Penzl Language , Vol. 62, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 216-217 Published by: Linguistic Society of America Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/415630

Czechoslovakia Before Munich: The German Minority Problems and British Appeasement Policy. by J. W. Bruegel; Czechoslovakia: The Party and the People. by Andrew Oxley; Alex Pravada; Andrew Ritchie

Review by: Frank Dinka Political Science Quarterly , Vol. 89, No. 1 (Mar., 1974), pp. 217-220 Published by: The Academy of Political Science Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2148142

An Informal History of the German Language: With Chapters on Dutch and Afrikaans, Frisian and Yiddish by W. B. Lockwood

Review by: W. E. Collinson The Modern Language Review , Vol. 62, No. 1 (Jan., 1967), pp. 150-151 Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3724155 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agentxp22 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are many many many more English language sources which use "Spis" or variants. Also, using the actual current name of the place follows wikipedia naming conventions. I'm also not sure what German language works, or works about the German language have to do with the article title in the English Wikipedia.VolunteerMarek 14:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that there was a requested move, as can be seen from the talk page and the consensus was to keep it at Spis [1] (note the closure which clearly states that this is the English name).VolunteerMarek 14:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sources I provided are English texts, if you would please check, I think you will see you are mistaken. Also, you have not provided any references for your claims. This is not adhering to wikipedia standards. Agentxp22 (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's 160,000 gbooks hits to look through [2].VolunteerMarek 14:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Witam

Daj znać jak sie z Tobą można skontaktować poza Wikipedią. nie znam się dokładnie na uzywaniu tych wszystkich talk page'ów i innych, więc jesli możesz podaj maila bądź nr gg - mamy podobny cel jesli chodzi o dział kontrowersji podczas Euro 2012 wiec chciałbym porozmawiać — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeonFor (talk • contribs) 16:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mozna wyslac mi emajla przes Wikipedia's email feature (z lewej: "email this user") VolunteerMarek 15:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 :Mozna wyslac mi emajla przes Wikipedia's email feature (z lewej: "email this user") [[User:Volunteer Marek|<font color="Orange">Volunteer</font><font color="Blue">Marek</font>]] 15:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
-== Misuse of word "trolling" ==
-Please don't remove my comments and say I'm "trolling" like you did in your last edit here. I explained in edit summaries and on talk pages that Suarez wasn't British, and you didn't even get to the second para of your own source to see that I was right. Instead you edit-warred - and ''you were wrong'''. Again, please stop it. Check your sources first before editing. You insisted your grammar was good too today and reverted me. Your grammar was not correct. If you will not look at your edits while doing them, and prefer to edit-war, I will have to contact you about them. That's logical isn't it? So, again, stop using the word "troll" every time you don't like what someone says (and when you yourself have made a mistake). Regards, [[User:Malick78|Malick78]] ([[User talk:Malick78|talk]]) 21:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)