User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Black Kite (talk | contribs) fmt |
→Rules: new section |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
hello. I saw what you wrote. Yes I agree it's a triviality, and that's part of my point. And I already discussed this (at length too) on the article talk page. The IP user doesn't care. So what do I do? I just don't like the fact that it was HIS last revert that remained just before your block protection. But the point though is that there's no "consensus" for his trivial whining about this matter, and there arguably doesn't need to be, as my modification is not some earth-shaking or horrible thing. But valid and sourced and standard. So again, what do I do here? [[User:Gabby Merger|Gabby Merger]] ([[User talk:Gabby Merger|talk]]) 01:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
hello. I saw what you wrote. Yes I agree it's a triviality, and that's part of my point. And I already discussed this (at length too) on the article talk page. The IP user doesn't care. So what do I do? I just don't like the fact that it was HIS last revert that remained just before your block protection. But the point though is that there's no "consensus" for his trivial whining about this matter, and there arguably doesn't need to be, as my modification is not some earth-shaking or horrible thing. But valid and sourced and standard. So again, what do I do here? [[User:Gabby Merger|Gabby Merger]] ([[User talk:Gabby Merger|talk]]) 01:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
* Unfortunately in the end where there is a dispute that is causing an edit-war and no side is obviously "correct" per Wikipedia policy the standard way of dealing with it is through protection. I hope the dispute can be solved on the talkpage. Obviously, when this happens, the page will be protected in what is for one side the [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wrong_Version Wrong Version], but this is of course unavoidable. Thanks, [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite#top|talk]]) 17:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
* Unfortunately in the end where there is a dispute that is causing an edit-war and no side is obviously "correct" per Wikipedia policy the standard way of dealing with it is through protection. I hope the dispute can be solved on the talkpage. Obviously, when this happens, the page will be protected in what is for one side the [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wrong_Version Wrong Version], but this is of course unavoidable. Thanks, [[User:Black Kite|Black Kite]] ([[User talk:Black Kite#top|talk]]) 17:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Rules == |
|||
I know them. '''[[User talk:Film Fan|<font color="00196c">F</font><font color="001f85">i</font><font color="00259f">l</font><font color="002bb8">m</font> <font color="0031d2">F</font><font color="0037eb">a</font><font color="0540ff">n</font>]]''' 08:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:10, 1 June 2013
Regarding dispute
hello. I saw what you wrote. Yes I agree it's a triviality, and that's part of my point. And I already discussed this (at length too) on the article talk page. The IP user doesn't care. So what do I do? I just don't like the fact that it was HIS last revert that remained just before your block protection. But the point though is that there's no "consensus" for his trivial whining about this matter, and there arguably doesn't need to be, as my modification is not some earth-shaking or horrible thing. But valid and sourced and standard. So again, what do I do here? Gabby Merger (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately in the end where there is a dispute that is causing an edit-war and no side is obviously "correct" per Wikipedia policy the standard way of dealing with it is through protection. I hope the dispute can be solved on the talkpage. Obviously, when this happens, the page will be protected in what is for one side the Wrong Version, but this is of course unavoidable. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Rules
I know them. Film Fan 08:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
