Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Assessment/Requests: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→New requests: rated as stub, but has significant amount of content |
added Category:WikiProject Video games using HotCat |
||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{historical|comment='''Reassessment is now handled by adding <code><nowiki>|reassess=y</nowiki></code> to {{Tl|WikiProject Video games}}, which adds it to [[:Category:Video game articles needing reassessment|this category]].'''}} |
|||
{{Archive box|box-width=178px|auto=long}} |
{{Archive box|box-width=178px|auto=long}} |
||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sidebar}} |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sidebar}} |
||
{{Distinguish|Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests}} |
{{Distinguish|Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests}} |
||
{{Shortcut|WP:VG/A/R}} |
{{Shortcut|WP:VG/A/R}} |
||
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to add it '''at the bottom''' of the list below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review|peer review department]] instead. |
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to add it '''at the bottom''' of the list below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review|peer review department]] instead. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
This page is '''not''' for requesting Good Article, Featured Article, or Featured List status. For such assessments, follow the instructions at [[WP:GAN|Good Article Nominations]], [[WP:FAC|Featured Article Candidates]], or [[WP:FLC|Featured List Candidates]]. |
This page is '''not''' for requesting Good Article, Featured Article, or Featured List status. For such assessments, follow the instructions at [[WP:GAN|Good Article Nominations]], [[WP:FAC|Featured Article Candidates]], or [[WP:FLC|Featured List Candidates]]. |
||
===New requests=== |
|||
<!-- Do not remove this example |
|||
# [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|Example]] - rated N-class, X-importance |
|||
Add a new request below this line in the same style as the example. Please link an article, not the talk page of one, nor a diff, nor a user subpage with a test article. Newest requests go at the bottom of the list. Please sign your name with "~~~~".--> |
|||
# [[Bloodbath of B-R5RB]] was just rated stub-class, but there is a significant amount of content. Wouldn't start or c-class be a better rating?--[[User:3family6|<font color="navy">¿3fam</font>]]'''''[[User talk:3family6|<font color="black">ily6</font>]]''''' <sub>[[Special:Contributions/3family6|<font color="purple">contribs</font>]]</sub> 18:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC) |
|||
# [[Metal Max (series)]]--[[User:Sahfkdsaj|Sahfkdsaj]] ([[User talk:Sahfkdsaj|talk]]) 14:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC) |
|||
# [[Guilty Gear]], [[Guilty Gear (video game)]], <s>[[Guilty Gear Isuka]]</s> - Improved these articles and I wanna know how good they are now. Cheers, [[User:Gabriel Yuji|Gabriel Yuji]] ([[User talk:Gabriel Yuji|talk]]) 03:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
# [[Intelligent Systems]] is currently rated Start-Class, though I wondered if it might qualify for C-Class in its current state. I did consider suggesting splitting the list of games developed into its own article, but given the length of the article as it stands, I felt that might be counter-productive at this point in time. '''[[User:jmtlr|Jack]]''' <small>[[User talk:jmtlr|talk]]</small> 15:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
# [[Steam Machine]] is currently rated Start-Class. I believe it has now reached the quality threshold of being upgraded to C-Class. [[User:DarthBotto|D<small>ARTH</small>B<small>OTTO</small>]]<sub> [[User talk:DarthBotto|talk]]•[[Special:Contributions/DarthBotto|cont]]</sub> 01:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
===Completed assessments=== |
===Completed assessments=== |
||
| Line 25: | Line 15: | ||
<!--when adding the first assessment of a month, send the previous month's assessments to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Archive 2. Newest assessments go at the bottom of the list.--> |
<!--when adding the first assessment of a month, send the previous month's assessments to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Archive 2. Newest assessments go at the bottom of the list.--> |
||
[[Category:WikiProject Video games]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 02:27, 15 June 2014
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. Reassessment is now handled by adding |reassess=y to {{WikiProject Video games}}, which adds it to this category. |
|
||
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to add it at the bottom of the list below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.
To nominate an article for A-class, go to WP:VG/ACR, start a nomination thread, and notify the project here with a link to said thread. Two uninvolved reviewers will need to review the article and agree it is an A before it can be listed as such. Please note that Good Article status is not a formal prerequisite for A-class assessment.
This page is not for requesting Good Article, Featured Article, or Featured List status. For such assessments, follow the instructions at Good Article Nominations, Featured Article Candidates, or Featured List Candidates.
Completed assessments
[edit]Recently completed assessments are listed below. Older assessments can be found in the archive.
