User talk:AnonMoos/Archive1

Welcome!

Hello, AnonMoos/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
• How to edit a page and write a great article
• The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
• The handy Manual of Style
• And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 17:52, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Re: Shield of the Trinity

Hello! I am a "fan" of the Shield and, as a pastor, have used in in many Bible studies and similar meetings. It is an excellent tool, and I hope you didn't interpret my edit as intending any disrespect (not intended) or tak any personal offense (also not offended). I look(ed) at the Shield as more of a symbol than a theological point, such as Justification, Incarnation, Resurrection, etc.

Upon further reflection, it seems to me that many, or at least some theological points are highly related to symbol (Genesis and Revelation are both FILLED with it really), and so I would have no problem if you were to restore the deleted category. I still think a category such as "Christian symbols" is most appropriate, but I will defer to your decision.

Thanks for your time! KHM03 22:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

I would hope that all Christian categories eventually relate to the "Christianity" category, but you never know. I'm not sure about more than that! KHM03 11:20, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Arabic

Hey what's with the Trinity fetish?

I just wanted to ask how you put Arabic script on the Mahdi page. I've seen it used around Wiki pages but I'm not sure how to add it. Do you speak Arabic? Cuñado - Talk 15:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

oops, I meant 99 names of God page, not Mahdi page. Cuñado - Talk

Thanks for contributing to Girl!

		An Award
		For your contributions to the CotW focusing on Girl in September, 2005, I, Mamawrites, award you, AnonMoos, this THANK YOU.

Jerry Lewis

I'm fairly aware of all the myths surrounding Jerry Lewis' alleged high popularity in France, common in the US. I reverted your sentence because I thought that the topic deserved a better explanation that a citation of a Weird Al Yankovic song... and I finally forgot to rewrite this part. Sorry about that. Reinserted something. David.Monniaux 16:01, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Bismillah

Thanks for the note about "blundering into [my] areas of ignorance". I'll try not to bear it in mind next time a new editor's cut-and-paste move mistake crops up on my watchlist. –Hajor 15:39, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Dear sir,

I see that you have been on WP for some time, which may have prompted your annoyance over the "move" I made. May I point out to you a WP guideline: Assume good faith? Now, refer me to the Arabic sources that proclaim basmala to be a better version or the name of Bismillah. I am a born Muslim with the obligatory knowledge of Quran, and this is the first time I have heard the word basmala referring to Bismillah. However, if basmala is kept being preferred over Bismillah here on WP, it isn't really going to erase Muslim memories which are very familiar with this line. Re: my name. While, it's none of your business, it raises academic curiosity off and on. (*Deep breath.* Your message is worthwhile, though the tone is not.) I thought you were an authority on Arabic and on Islam and would see the connection? My name is Arabic, Muslim, and it means a woman who can make a prophecy/ see into the future. With so much interest in me and my edits, did you not see my user page?

I didn't attack the de: and it: sections because I am not an omnipotent Wikipedian - and contrary to your harsh allegation, I do keep myself away from languages I have no knowledge of.

If you want to teach me the ways of Wikipedia, please be kind next time. I will listen. Here is something that I would expect of you: Don't bite the newcomers. P.S. I am a newcomer here, but neither to the world of wiki, nor Islam. Having said all this, I have no grudge, and I leave the article alone until we each can have a meaningful dialog. TheProphetess 17:10, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for writing back, it saved me some real heartache. I did make a mistake by playing around with the page without talking about it first. It's a newbie mistake, for which I was sorry when –Hajor pointed out. I was alarmed by what I maintain is a much less popular term for Bismillah, if it is indeed the name of Bismillah at all. I have read Arabic for over 25 years. NEVER did I hear basmala was a variant of Bismillah, let alone its name. I am a Muslim, and if basmala were valid, I would be the first one to defend it. Anyway, the rudimentary Arabic explanation that I left on the talk page is valid, I may not have written it well. My mother language is Urdu, which is written and read like Arabic, and is derived from Persian and Arabic, among other languages. When we start learning how to read Arabic, this is how we begin. It was for the benefit of anyone (and I cannot account for the vast variety of language exp level of the readers/ editors) who may wonder about the variants.

Here's something that might give us a clue. From Hajor's talk page:

QUOTE: Sigh. I have a feeling it is going to stretch on. Bismillah is the name of Bismillah. AnonMoos got very upset at my explanation of how Arabic is written - perhaps because he's the native speaker of a language different from my native language - and we each approached studying Arabic differently. However, I am the Muslim here, and if I were searching for "Bismillah," <<this is the spelling I'd use. Proven earlier by the Google test. I still give benefit of doubt to AnonMoos, because Bismillah when written in Arabic is a component of 3 words: ba, ism, Allah. By, (the) name, (of) Allah. Together it is read as Bis-mil-lah. Bismillah. UNQUOTE. Whew. Tonight's one of our holy nights, and I am off to pray. Thanks for writing back. I did feel that you perhaps thought I was a vandal messing up with the page... I hope now it's clear. :)

P.S. Indeed I must thank you for the concern about the word/name prophetess. It is admittedly scandalous. The word "Prophet" refers to (according to Islam, etc. of course) the Prophets of Allah. The word prophet in general is about someone who can make a prophecy - such as in the phrase prophet of doom. Likewise Messenger of Allah is different from, e.g. the messenger who arrived with a letter for you this afternoon. You know this, of course, I just wanted to give you the context. Anyway, I'll look into your suggestion, it crossed my own mind earlier. Hmmm, I had more to say but WP says talkpages aren't for usenet style chatting. I am available on e-mail if you wish. See my user page. Regards. TheProphetess 18:21, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Salafi

AnonMoos, the sections you restored weren't just deleted -- they were extensively rewritten and re-organized into the one section on current trends in Salafism. It really really messes up the article to have one treatment of these matters above, and another, more disorganized and Salafi-POV, treatment below. I'd like you to reconsider the addition of the old sections. Zora 21:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

QWERTY.png

Hi, I've listed the cleaned-up keyboard image Image:QWERTY.png, uploaded by you, for deletion because I've redrawn it (Image:Qwerty.svg). Hope this is OK. Mysid (talk) 13:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Okay. By smaller viewbox, do you mean smaller white borders? Mysid (talk) 06:03, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Acceso a la independencia.png

Sorry! I've already uploaded the corrected version of the map. If you see another mistake, please let me know. Thanks for your advice! es:Usuario:Mortadelo2005

I don't appreciate insults

but I really don't appreciate attempts to pervert history and facts. The article doesn't mention that the Israeli occupation kills civilians, and it doesn't mention that the Palestinian armed resistance has also involved - but by no means exclusively - attacks on civilians. Both facts are reasonably well-known. The changes you wish to make would imply that all Palestinian "non-non-violent" resistance was either terrorism or suicide bombings. Not true, and see also Wikipedia:Words to avoid. Palmiro | Talk 21:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

I don't care what was there first. I'm perfectly happy to acknowledge that I replaced POV and inaccurate material with factually accurate and NPOV material. I am not denying and don't seek to deny that violent resistance by Palestinians has included attacks on civilians, and personally I deplore such attacks (that of course is my POV). Neither do I deny that the Israeli occupation has also involved (many more) attacks on civilians (which I also deplore). In the interests of balance, if we insist on specifically mentioning that aspect of the violence (which is not what the article is about), we should mention it in relation to both parties. However, if you wish to take out the reference to armed Palestinian resistance altogether, I will not make a fight about it, although I would think it better that it remained. Palmiro | Talk 17:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

OK, you say you would like the discussion to proceed on a reasonably civil basis, while at the same time accusing me of making my edit "from what I can tell, with a very specific and deliberate intention of whitewashing over brutal atrocities and crimes with a weaselling equivocating euphemism". How on earth can you justify attributing such a motivation to me? In order to help establish a civil tone, I'll explain my motivation in detail.

My main concern was accuracy and fairness. The previous version read in part "...Arab resistance often carries connotations of terrorist attacks and of suicide bombers in particular...". Well, the suicide bombs are a relatively recent phenomenon, and both armed attacks on military targets and non-violent actions were going on long before them. Furthermore, Palestinian resistance to many people carries connotations of teenagers throwing stones at heavily armed soldiers, of what many people see as heroic defiance against overwhelming force. So these connotations may appear to some people, but definitely not to all. "Armed action" seemed like a neutral term that would cover all Palestinian violent resistance (I suppose except stone-throwing) without going into details that are extraneous to the subject under discussion. Particularly, why accuse the Palestinians of terrorism when the Israeli armed forces have killed far more civilians? Incidentally, I think this principle of not delving into non-related matters should also be extended to the section on South Africa.

Your later edit read, in part, "has involved non-violent resistance as well as terrorist attacks and suicide bombings." Again, that implies that Palestinian armed resistance was all terrorism, when quite a lot of it has been armed attacks on military targets.

I hope that this helps clarify both my intentions and my edits, and I would like you to reconsider your claim that I had "a very specific and deliberate intention of whitewashing over brutal atrocities and crimes". Palmiro | Talk 18:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

let's keep the present section heading as adequate for this too. See Germanic_Neopaganism#Symbolism: This is me doing your work. dab (ᛏ) 13:26, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, apparently I was wrong in thinking that you wanted a civil discussion. Or else you have a very different conception of "civil" from me. At this stage, I'd be very happy never to have any exchanges with you again.

As for "condescending", well, how about "some Palestinians have felt the need to take up acts of non-violent resistance to improve the international Palestinian image"? Utter condescending nonsense. I know Palestinians who are engaged in non-violent resistance and "improving their international image" isn't what they are motivated by. Not to mention "armchair romantic radicals from a distance like yourself". How do you know anything about me that gives you a right to make such assumptions?

As far as I'm concerned, this conversation is at an end. Palmiro | Talk 14:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Since you ask, I was going to suggest just that formulation at a much earlier stage but was put off by your obnoxious tone and wild personal attacks.Palmiro | Talk 16:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Please take a look

Please look at israeli arabs and see what palmiri is doing there. Thanks. Zeq 20:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Category:Spiritual and religious images

I understand that you have a big thing for "spirituality" (even though this word unfortunately doesn't convey much of anything in particular to large numbers of people) -- however, the whole point of creating a cross-link to Wikimedia Commons (which I was the first to do for this category) is to provide a practical pointer to locations where further images of interest may be found. Unfortunately Commons:Category:Spirituality doesn't meet this criterion because it's almost completely empty. Furthermore, it really doesn't suit you to try to jump on a high horse of "anti-deletionism", considering that you previously deleted the link to Commons:Category:Religious symbols -- which is as highly useful as Commons:Category:Spirituality is highly useless... - AnonMoos 02:31, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

If you truly are interested in developing the category of spiritual and religious images, then your selection of one in fifty religion subcategories at the commons - religious symbols - makes no sense either. That's why I replaced it with the beliefs category. If your criterion is current size of a category, then this is a superior choice. In addition, it goes well beyond a small sample from a few religious traditions, which is the case with the religious symbolism category. I'm more than willing to go with the larger religion category and the beliefs category. Zeroing in on the symbolism subcategory alone is too narrow. — Richard_RDF^talk 03:29, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up about large PNGs

I was wondering what was going on. I've uploaded a jpg version and asked for the original to be speedy deleted. Maybe something should about it should be put on the image upload page?

Thanks Megapixie 05:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Idiotarian

Hi - I'm just trying to figure out what the NPOV dispute is there. Would you mind replying at Talk:Idiotarian? I will leave a message for Dragula also. Thanks, Kaisershatner 22:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Triple Spiral

Explan: If you record the point that the sun strikes at midday every day you see that it progresses in an expanding circle - i.e. a spiral. The spiral then reverses after three months and inverts so you get four spirals over a twelve month period ergo value of three monthes hence my gestation point. Sorry about the bad spelling of 'months' Pydos 08:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

See reply at Talk:Triple spiral, AnonMoos 15:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Flower-of-Life-small.png

Hi AnonMoos, thanks for letting me know about this image obsoleting one I'd uploaded. Regards, Proto t c 15:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

sydney riots/gang rapes

Read the discussion on the talk page first! Talk:2005_Sydney_race_riots#Sydney_gang_rapes The consensus is against you at present. DaveSymonds 12:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ru-ingusxetija.png has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Ru-ingusxetija.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Southern Syria

Perhaps you can take your info about Southern Syria and Bilad al Sham to the Levant article or the Names of the Levant instead of continuing to revert. Yuber^(talk) 18:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy merge?

Hi. This is re: your comments for Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 26#Category:Spiritual Books to Category:Spiritual books. I would've done a speedy rename except the target category already exists. Is there such a thing as a speedy merge? wknight94 15:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Land of Israel

If you have time, could you comment on my suggestion here ?--Sjsilverman 17:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

K Street Project

"Coziness" doesn't really come across as an NPOV term. Could you please add who is doing the accusing? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Shield of the Trinity (bis)

I'm curious about the creation of these images. What software did you use? I do similar things, but with a very Goldbergesque collection of tools. Oh, and I appreciate your comments my Kabbalah question. Odd that such an apparently committed Christian should know about the Rose Cross Lamen.--◀Puck^talk▶ 21:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

You wrote: I often do hand-written PostScript code. On some Wikipedia image pages I include the PostScript source, such as at Image:St-Faith-Arms.png. PostScript can be converted to PDF, and rendered to a raster image in a number of ways.

Thanks for the pointer. I had no idea PostScript was editable as plain text. I've had experience writing DXF files by hand and generating graphics with routines in Basic and C so this looks like a promising tool. What is a good general purpose application for importing and exporting PostScript? I have CadStd Lite. It will export PostScript, but not import it.

You also said: due to the nature of Hebrew orthography and morphological structure (see Triconsonantal root), a significant percentage of sequences of three random Hebrew letters will be meaningful Hebrew words.

Thanks for that, too. It explains a lot. And here I was thinking it was because God speaks Hebrew. ;-)--◀Puck^talk▶ 14:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

On a whim I just went looking for Gimp for a Windows platform. I found it and it seems it may do the trick.--◀Puck^talk▶ 15:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Muhajir Page

I have reorganized the Muhajir page to be general page for all Muhajir (It is a Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Urdu word meaning Refugee) groups. This page also has links to different Muhajir groups. I would really appreciate if you would discuss this issue before reverting my changes. I have already explained the reason on the Muhajir discussion page. --User:Siddiqui 17:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Gallery

You have a lot of extremely large images on your userpage. Why not format them with gallery-tags? - Mgm|^(talk) 12:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

New count for hacker test on google

160 unique hits for "Herewith a compendium of fact and folklore about computer hackerdom". Timothy Clemans 01:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Maria Theresia

Hello! In my oppinion the right form is with "i" - "Maria Theresia" - because of the latin tradition of the Holy Roman Empire. I think that the name "Theresa" is too vernacular for an Empress, even in English. --Mihai Andrei 13:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

---

194.131.255.12 13:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Just to let you know there's now a page for John of Wallingford

Thanks for adding the farsi letters to Mahtab

Now if only I can learn how you did that.... Madangry 01:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

unsigned comment by User:DieWeibeRose

Sorry about that. --DieWeibeRose 13:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

129. or TPW

AnonMoos

Why did you edit my redirect page? The fact of the matteris that I started with 129. Then as you are pointing I chose to use letters instead of numbers and I chose TPW. Your help would be appreciated in showing me how to sign with TPW when I edit a page instead of 129. By the way an IP address is a lot longer and your name AnonMoos is very anonym to me. 129. 14:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Peace on those who like it. Thank you for the tip, although your tone does not seem to be friendly. Unfortunately your tip did not work. It does let me sign in even with TPW even if I am on a totally different computer. It thinks that there is another user called TPW. Emailing the password for TPW does not work either. I am trying now the preferences thing. As to you can keep your pornography you can "proudly" keep it on your user page even if I agree with you on this. At the same time I feel terrorist is a big word that will certainly include anybody who bomb innocent civilians. Surely someone killing himself in the way is better than the one cozily sitting in a fighter jet and destroying houses and killing innocent civilians because of the mere thought that maybe somebody is wanted there. While the first is using all what he got, the second could have made a better choice. Both of them surely do not know what peace is and who is The Peace. At the end I follow the example of Jesus and Mary as best described in the Qur'an. “Peace be upon those who are guided” is my motto. The Peace Worshipper^Talk 02:13, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Script-analysis_3.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Script-analysis_3.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Shams

Please tell me in what language "Shams" means "Inhabitant of Greater Syria". Because it sure doesn't seem to mean that in either Arabic or English, according to the sources I have available... AnonMoos 21:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry about the mistake. I tried to understand why Shams redirects to the article in the first place, as it looks like a wrong redirect. In order to disambiguate, I had to either create another page (which is what I did because I wasn't sure enough that it was a wrong redirect), or remove the redirect altogether. Thanks for fixing the mess I created. - Eagle^talk 00:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Some people need a map to find Jesus

I saw your map Image:Early-Historical-Israel-Dan-Beersheba-Judea.png, and I was wondering if you has a similar map of first-century Iudea, Samaria, Perea and Galilee? Grigory Deepdelver AKA Arch O. La^TalkTCF 23:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Lindisfarne Gospels

The image I removed is not relevant because it is not an image of the Lindisfarne Gospels, it is modern work inspired by the Lindisfarne Gospels, of which there are thousands. (Every artist interested in Celtic Knotwork has created similar images.) This particular image does nothing to help understand the subject and could lead to serious misunderstanding. For example, that shade of green is not found in the mnauscript. Likewise, the shading found in the image (getting darker at the points and as the strands pass under other strands) is not typical of Insular art and is misleading. I have removed the image from Lindisfarne Gospels and Migration Period art for these reason. I have left it in Celtic Art because it is a fine example of modern work inspired by Insular art. Dsmdgold 14:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

symbols category

well, maybe "Neopagan symbols". "Pagan" is too wide, it could include all African, Asian, Polynesian etc. native traditions. I'm not entirely sure about even the "Neopagan" category (too eclectic). Maybe just categorize as "Neopaganism" and "Symbol" case by case. Just my thoughts, though. dab (ᛏ) 20:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

well, we are really stuck with the fact that "Paganism" is an umbrella term coined from the Christian pov. Even self-describing pagans succumb to that by often defining themselves in contradistinction to Christianity. Terms like "Forn Sidhr" are an attempt to overcome this, seeking a self-centered tradition without the need of an external "enemy" in order to define itself. I presume you are intending to group Germanic pagan symbols. How about a specific "Germanic symbols" or "Germanic pagan symbols" category then? Still, as you predicted, this will open disputes about whether a given symbol is "genuinely Germanic". I would, for example, object to the categorization of the "Fylfot" or the "Sunwheel" (not to mention the "Black Sun") as such. It may be better to just settle with a "Neopagan symbols" category. I do not intend to police categories too strictly, so I am not likely to interfere with you too much here, just make sure that if the category name implies use of the symbol in antiquity that you include only symbols for which a case for ancient use can be made. dab (ᛏ) 17:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Divisions of Islam Islamic science Eugene R. Black WCWM Masoretes Bulgarian customs Islamic art Battle of the Trench Eudes of Aquitaine The Kids Will Have Their Say Fiqh Popular Front (France) Nikah Islands of North Korea List of wrestlers over 300 pounds Franz Hartmann List of Salvadoran Americans Kink List of Korean ceramic artists and sculptors

Cleanup Seal of the Prophets Abd Shams ibn Abd al-Manaf Atenism Merge Queen of Sheba Isra and Mi'raj Abdul Qadir Jilani Add Sources Din (Arabic term) People of the Book Laylat al-Qadr Wikify Enema Optera Alavi Bohras Expand Ihram Tawalla Criticism of Hinduism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 06:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

'Jehova' merge to 'Tetragrammaton'

From a fellow Tetragrammaton editor (mostly lurker), I thought you might be interested in the nascent discussion on the Talk:Jehovah page about merging the articles. I have no opinion yet as I haven't seen what's intended, but you seem to have experience in dealing with merges to Tetragrammaton. Dbratton 19:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Salafi revised, please check it out

Avoiding some RL work, I sat down and rewrote the Salafi article. It lacks references and now that it's organized to some extent by country, could use more info. Please check and correct what needs correcting. Zora 01:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Kana

Yo. I'm currently creating and standardizing all of the articles on individual kana. I noticed your addition. Feel free to add anything to them — I speak no Japanese and am doing this mostly because there's not enough work to justify a bot! Thanks and happy editing. - Corbin ∫ 1 ɱ p s ɔ ♫ ^{Rock on, dude!} 05:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Islamikaze up for deletion

Greetings, unfortunately User:Irishpunktom didn't have the good faith to notify you that he's submitted an article you created for deletion. You may want to voice your opinion about that here. Netscott 09:52, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Moved from Talk:British Isles (terminology)

Someone asked this regarding the British_Isles_Venn_Diagram.png. I checked out the image history, and it seems that you were the one who added the ellipse around england and wales. Maybe consider at least responding on the talk page to the query. Cheers, 82.82.184.34 16:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Some kind of explanation as to why England and Wales appear as they do in the venn diagram might be appropriate. I presume this relates to Wales being part of the Kingdom of England when it unified with the Kingdom of Scotland in 1707 to form Great Britain? 194.203.110.127 15:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes. I changed the circle back to an ellipse, and moved some captions around a little, so the new version of the image should be clearer now. AnonMoos 06:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The Arms of Sir Robert Bell=

Bro, Re: Image. The Achievement of the paticular Arms is somwhat unique, in that it has two Bennu's =Christ! Re: Image. Thank you for the help, however, the image was distorted after you modified it. I restored the image of the Arms (legacy), and I am deciding on the tag. Thanks again. P.S. Nice art work! Holy Trinity ^t/c 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the insight Re: browsers etc. Id rather be your friend than your fo! cause you seem to know a fair amount re: programing. The Bennu Bird or Phoenix, is an early Christian symbol, representing Fire (Holy Spirit) and Divinity. They are seeking the Light! Anyway, thank you for the help. ^t/c 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for making a good change at my User Page. --- Faisal 18:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Shield

I just printed out the shield and will show it to a man at church tomorrow. Thanks.  - Cestus ^Cd 16:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Crescent

Thanks for adding back that clause I deleted. I think I misread it when I removed it. --P3d0 20:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Smartquotes/Directed quotes

I thought you might have something to add to this on the administrators noticeboard. Tyrenius 23:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding ==Ancient Chinese Languages Writingwise==

Some people say the above stated languages are dialects, but it is true that language is CAN ONLY be officalized via Mutual Unintelligebility. So I was just asking the question, because these modern languages can understand each other in writing; That means that the syntax of the languages are the same, but I/we can't determine if they are different languages, if I/we don't know if the Syntax of the OLd languages were mutually intelligebable. Now, the reason I did not say just '....other SYNTACTAICALLY....' but '....other in writing SYNTACTICALLY....' is because you can't understand the langages phonologically, anyways, so it I just put the '....in writing....' to clarify, but if it didn't help, then I guess that was too bad, we're all sorry, & I'm sorry for everything:'(

Please, iooiioioo@hotmail.com, thanks.

But thanks for the reply:-D

24.70.95.203 06:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Reference

I don't think Lisa Simpson needs a foot note. Just change the text so it reads something like "and some German verbs (as shown in Episode Title)". -- Steven Fisher 17:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

R-H-M

Yes... Zora and I have gotten very frustrated in the past when we had to clean up literally dozens of stubs... (and just like this article they used primary sources which weren't very encyclopedic and on topic.) It's just that no one types in RHM to find the basmala... and RHM root is not for all of the words of the basmala... I have no problem deleting it... just, there is no reason it should be a redirect. I know that AfD is probably frustrating... (personally, I don't care about this kind of stub because it doesn't create any real bias... unlike creating articles about Shia view of X) But... if it is violating an agreement maybe it can be deleted more easily? I'm not sure. The article needs to have a source about the root RHM specifically... instead of describing issues not directly related. I do agree with you... I just don't think it should be a redirect. If you want to change it back then I guess you can... but, it should be deleted unless it really discusses R-H-M. Although, it could easily fail on AfD because of eventualism. gren グレン 19:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Tahrirolvasyleh

Weasel words?

Here is Wikipedia's definition:

Weasel words are almost always intended to deceive or draw attention from something the speaker doesn't want emphasized, rather than being the inadvertent result of the speaker's or writer's poor but honest attempt at description.

A link that says the viewer can see text from the book by clicking on it, when it really just shows some text which is not necessarily from such a book, seems to be a good example of that.

--Johan77 17:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Sign for highways

Hello AnonMoos, you have altered the seize of signs of highways , e.g. , so that all the pages linked to this symbol on the german wikipedia are damaged ( I don't know, how it's the situation with the other languages). You can it on de:Wiener Außenringautobahn. Please reverte it or load your signs under an other filename. regards K@rl 08:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC) (pleas answer me here :de:Benutzer Diskussion:Karl Gruber|Karl Gruber)

Háček

There's yet another vote at talk:caron. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 04:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

"Gorean Book compendium" mini-stubs

I can understand a correction and brief instruction or hints on how to complete it, but not the casual erasure and harsh "you got it wrong, do it like this" attitude that you have.

This is at total discord with the Wikipedian / community approach that I'd come to think Wikipedia stood for. Frankly, I'm now wondering why I should bother to extend it, rather than being excited (as I was) at the thought of participating.

Frankly, your attitude to newbies is more than likely turning every person away from Wikipedia that you "correct" in such a harsh manner - in short: hindering more than you help.

If you 'correct' 10 articles each week, but turn those same 10 people away from contributing - you're simply preventing growth, rather than aiding proper growth by helping newbs.

I'm annoyed, and frankly very angry at such treatment - I appreciate you "help", but NOT your attitude.

I'm happy to be corrected - but not smacked down like a little child.

Tiberiusgrant 13:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

YHWH

Anonmoos, The talk page of YHWH should most likely have alot of its content archived. And I don't know how to do that (and since I'm at work most of the time, I haven't a moment to find out). If you have time -- and since you are on the page often -- do you think you could do that? If you don't do it, I'll TRY to do it this weekend... Rivka 21:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Londonistan

Please explain your reversion on the discussion page before reverting edits. Thanx Paki.tv 14:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Takbir

Hi, actually I meant to delete Allah-u-Akbar and leave Allahu Akbar. oops Cuñado - Talk 16:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Canterbury cross

Thank you -- it would be wonderful if you could contribute an illustration. Try this link: www.seiyaku.com/customs/crosses/canterbury.html to see a picture of a Canterbury cross. --Haddison 02:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Try this for Canterbury cross

This link may help: www.gallerybyzantium.com/canterbury.html

Look at the bigger pieces of jewelry. Haddison 13:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Early-Historical-Israel-Dan-Beersheba-Judea.png

Hello,

you appear to be marked as the creator of the above image. It claims to refer to the time of the United Monarchy. Is it therefore possible that you could put onto the map the locations of Shiloh (former capital), Gibeah (Saul's capital), and indicate which areas of the map were part of David's Judah and which were parts of Ishbaal and Absalom's Israel ? --User talk:FDuffy 13:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Death worship

I've noticed that the edit war on Death worship has been going on for almost a month. Could you briefly explain the situation? I'm willing to help mediate, but I need to understand the problem. —Viriditas | Talk 11:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for getting back to me so fast. Would it be possible for you to add references to the disputed content? I'm only trying to offer solutions that might end the edit war. —Viriditas | Talk 21:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't clear. My point is, if the text includes inline references (see WP:CITE) other contributors can get involved without having to ask you to explain the problem. As it stands, the conflict is less than clear, and basically amounts to an edit war, instead of an anon editor removing cited sources. Does that make sense? —Viriditas | Talk 23:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Citing sources will solve the dispute to the best of our ability. That is to say, anything unreferenced is fair game for removal. What we are left with is the closest approximation to the facts as we are best able to state them. This leaves no room for edit wars, and anyone engaging in said edit wars will either find themselves blocked, or in this case, page protection can be imposed, preventing anonymous IP's from editing. You see? —Viriditas | Talk 03:34, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I've moved this discussion and the one on my talk page to Talk:Death worship where we should continue talking with the anon. —Viriditas | Talk 20:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Samir Kuntar

Damn, I totally missed that - I checked the talk page and didn't see anything near the bottom. Oh well, you're right - that's a pretty bad explaination, the paragraph is definitely relevant. --james^(talk) 16:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Border Ruffian recat reversion

Thanks for paying attention to Border Ruffian. As part of the ongoing effort to keep entries in Category:American Civil War to a minimum, I recategorized this article in Category:Confederate States Army, along with several other articles related to Bleeding Kansas.

I can understand that you may not agree with the recat. However, this article belongs in a subcategory -- not the "top-level" category. To avoid an edit war, I would suggest simply removing the Category:American Civil War. That keeps the article in Category:Bleeding Kansas, which is a sub-cat of Category:American Civil War.

What do you think? Twisted86 19:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Okey doke. I'll take that as an "okay with me" and remove the ACW cat. Thanks for the reply. Twisted86 05:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

RE:Image:Proposed postwar Japan occupation zones.png

It's historical, just was never implemented. -- Миборовский 08:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Abjad numerals#Uses of the Abjad system

Linking numerology to Isopsephy is misleading, so better not to have it linked to anything, or else change it explicitly to the word you want. (Besides, Isopsephy is linked in the third paragraph of the section.) Since Numerology links to Isopsephy in the See also section, I don't see what the problem is, but I refuse to get into an edit war over it. --Dennette 11:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I just discovered that Basmala#Numerology also has the same misleading link ([[Isopsephy|numerology]]), but I'm not going to touch it. --Dennette 11:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The problem is that it is misleading, because most readers will not click the link, thinking they already know what "numerology" means ... you should use use Isopsephy explicitly, and people will click the unfamiliar word and learn something. This is an English language Wikipedia, and readers who are not Muslim, or native speakers of the Arabic language, have probably never heard of "Abjad numerals." --Dennette 11:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

It's not "misleading" -- it's a link to the most specific relevant sub-area of the word in the link. Isopsephy is actually a Greek word, and the vast majority of Muslims and Arabic-speakers would have no idea what the heck it means. AnonMoos 11:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

You are confusing two distict comments:

• Numerology only mentions Isopsephy in it's See also section, and Isopsephy only mentions Numerology because I recently added the link.
• My comment about "Muslims and Arabic-speakers" related to "Abjad numerals", not "Isopsephy", and I probably should not have even mentioned it, because the discussion started with the "numerology" link in the "Abjad numerals" article, and even I don't remember how I got there in the first place.

My point is that [[Isopsephy|numerology]] is the same as having [[Dog|Cat]] or [[Cat|Mouse]], and that is what I mean by "misleading", i.e., "I'm confused ... when I click this link, it seems to lead to an entirely different word." (That is why I added a link for "numerology" to the article for "Isopsephy", since prior to that, it only appeared in the Category section.) --Dennette 12:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Indus script, Rongorongo

I deleted the whole section claiming that the Russian guy (forget name) had deciphered the script. It's a pure vanity edit and kookery; he has no scholarly credibility. He keeps inserting the self-praise from various anonIPs. It's delete on sight, not revise. Zora 08:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Basmala

Ok, I see. Thank you for correcting me.--Fox Mccloud 18:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

POTD

This is to let you know the Featured Picture you uploaded and/or nominated Image:IsometricFlaw 2.svg is scheduled to be Picture of the day on October 23, 2006, when it will be featured on the Main Page. Congratulations! howcheng {chat} 18:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Gor

Thanks for your note regarding the use of "alleged". I still think "reportedly" works better. (To me, "alleged" has criminal connotations.) But I'm not tied to it, and if you think it would be better the other way, feel free to change it back. I wasn't aware of the five year wait for the book when I made the edit, and I appreciate you letting me know. Rray 04:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Ket(h)ib(h)/v

Not that I appreciate your way of approaching this, but I will give you a respectful response nonetheless.

I recreated the article Kethib/Ketiv because the title of the article itself is spelled badly. The old article with the very poorly transliterated Kethib should be DELETED because it does not represent any transliteration scheme. If the original author wanted to follow an older system, then it would be kethibh (since the Bet is aspirated = [v]), but he/she did not. Nowadays, the majority of people who comment on Hebrew either use a standardized system for transliteration, in which כתיב would look like kĕtîb, or they use a more sound-based transliteration such as ketiv. No one who actually knows Hebrew at this time (as far as my experience goes) would ever transliterate כתיב as kethib. - Yonah

I had thought I wrote on your talk page, but I guess I didn't. I apologize for the misplacement. - Yonah mishael 02:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

As per the blocked discussion, my purpose is to separate speech of each participant. Sometimes people post in the middle of someone else's statement, and it is often (in my reading anyway) difficult to tell who is saying what. Separating my text indicates exactly what I have written on a discussion page. This is useful especially when a comment is longer than one paragraph. If I place it only in lightgrey or silver, does this offend your obviously superior senses (since everything that I do seems to be STUPID in your book -- which is hardly a form of respectful discourse)? - Yonah mishael

Re:Taborites

Interesting theory, but it is well documented that the tabor formation was named after the wagon used, and the Hussites were known for their use of the formation.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 03:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Sevener , ar:سبعية

Hey AnonMoos, I will look into that one, and attempt to fix it. Altho I have to say I have no background info about the subject because I am christian, but I will educate myself about the subject and work on translating the english sources into arabic. I will let you know when I think its done. Cheers --Lord Anubis 13:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Done

ar:سبعية --Lord Anubis 14:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hamza

Well, You are right ( As I pointed out in the arabic wiki Holy Trinity discussion page), It should be Hamza, and not just the normal Aleph, but Arabs usually neglect putting the Hamza on the character when writing, and they have adapted the same thing when typing (typing ا is easier than أ). Having studied arabic for 10 years (And it is my first language), I still forget when to put hamza or aleph. It is kinda like the french vowels in english-adopted words, how often do you type "Cafe" with a é instead of e? ie: Café ?! How come you know Arabic then ? Do you have an arabic background ? --Lord Anubis

Hamza - continued

Thanx man, ur efforts are appreciated. Aram33 is actually the man working on Arabic Christianity articles. I am contributing to that section as well, I think me & Aram are probably the only active christians on Arabic wiki, LOL. o well.

RE: Christian Arabic terms

I answered some of your questions on the discussion page. --Lord Anubis 16:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Holy Trinity

You are absolutely right, it is إله. typo , lol. you're better at arabic than I am .--Lord Anubis 14:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Reqimageother on U+F8FF

While I definitely agree that the addition of rasterized forms of the glyphs described in U+F8FF would turn a rather useless article into something worth reading, as I mentioned on the talk page, the character space was once used as a form of copy protection, done by inserting trademarked logos into fonts to move the unauthorized duplication from the realm of legal uncertainty to concrete copyright infringement. For this reason, I'm not sure that it will fall under blanket fair use to use rasterized versions of these glyphs in the article, particularly the Apple logo. If you have any ideas of how to work with/around this, I would love to see the article greatly refined and will of course contribute rasterized glyphs from the Mac side myself where possible. --INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 03:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Indeed, use of corporate logos are allowed under fair use. But look at the specific template:

This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright and/or trademark. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of logos

• to illustrate the organization, item, or event in question
• on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement. See Wikipedia:Fair use and Wikipedia:Logos.

Use of the logo here does not imply endorsement of the organization by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor does it imply endorsement of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation by the organization.

To the uploader: please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on Wikipedia:Image description page, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.

I'm not sure that illustrating a font glyph falls under fair use by those critera. I know the Apple logo has been removed from Apple-related userboxes that I have created in the past. You could argue that under the wording of the template we are illustrating the item in question, but I read it more as a catch-all phrase, so that if the item represents a corporation it can be used for that article, if it represents an item (ie. a product shot) it can be used for description of the product, etc. --INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 16:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Holy Spirit

AnonMoos, thanks for your comments, firstly, Muslims refer to the Angel Gabriel as : جبريل (Jibreel). Whilst Arab Christians refer to him as جبرائيل (Gabriel, Jibra'eel). secondly, I think we should redirect الله الروح القدس to الروح القدس, just like it is in English Wikipedia ("God the holy spirit" is redirected to "Holy Spirit"). I'll do that, thnx for your suggestion. keep up the good work. --Lord Anubis 18:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Trinity

I was just wondering if you erased the "Anti-Trinity arguments" from the Trinity page for any special reason or if you did it because of theological bias. -- unsigned comment by anonymous IP 68.91.35.219 23:21, 28 October 2006'

Get an account, so that you have an actual user talk page, and then I'll explain there... AnonMoos 23:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay, there you go. Now we can talk. Why did you erase the "Anty-Trinity arguments" from the Trinity page? -- unsigned comment by User:Lyons24000 by 18:25, 29 October 2006

How do you sign a comment?

Thanks

Lyons24000 20:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

---

Re: MASH Why am I being accused of vandalism, please clarify.

I and the IP address are the same person. Look, I'm really new and hopeless at certain things, but I am not a vandal. I like to contribute now and again, and I hope I'll get better at it. It's a bit intimidating to be called a vandal.Luckyles 12:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Gorean

Hi, thanks for dropping by my talk page. I disagree with you and have commented on the talk page of the Gorean article. You asked for me to improve rather than just remove, and I have suggested that a change to Gorean beliefs would be a means of helping to avoid what is currently a clear POV problem that appears to have been unable to be rectified for at least six months. MLA 08:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Time for a mini-chill pill?

OK maybe I didn't have to say that the Christianity template sucks, but I'm not sure what you mean about the other two. Cuñado - Talk 03:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

All those issues are where you disagree with me, not that I'm being un-constructive. I made a suggestion on the transliteration because I happen to be familiar with Arabic transliteration, and I wasn't insisting anything; just offering my opinion. I think you're upset because my suggestion didn't agree with what you wanted. On Salafism, I added the merge tag because the articles themselves claimed that they were talking of the same movement, and I explained it on the talk page in a reasonable way. I'm sorry that you think I'm not a constructive editor, but as I recall, on both of those pages I contributed a significant amount of formatting and cleanup. Cuñado - Talk 08:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Flower of Life

You suggested that..

• (A) Da Vinci's Challenge is "not much of a source" for a reference, and
• (B) The subsections explaining the various parts of the Flower of Life should be replaced with a list.

I respond..

• (A) That source is much better than what was previously there, which was NO references. However, I agree that the promo text from a board game is not a desirable source. It would be best if I or you were to find another source for the same information and list both sources.
• (B) The subsections listing like that was meant to be further expanded and elaborated on. Each one of those components of the flower of life deserves a great deal of attention and description. It would certainly not do it justice or be very informative to reduce it all to a simple bulleted list.

Secondly.. I just discovered that you have reverted ALL OF THE WORK that I spent an entire day working on. You simply eliminated EVERYTHING that I had written and replaced it with the old STUB of an article. This is highly unacceptable and very aggrivating! There is a code of conduct to be followed in editing Wikipedia and it certainly falls outside of these guidelines to arbitrarily decide that EVERYTHING someone has written in a lengthy expansion should all be flushed down the tube at your whim, without even the slightest regard for preserving ANY of the useful information presented. Again I remind you that the article was a simple STUB before I got there, and I expanded it significantly.

If you would like to help improve the quality of the article then try contributing to it instead of taking away from it. If you want better sources for the information cited then either request it or find it yourself. DON'T simply delete it. If you think that information listed under subsection headings is incomplete, then add to it! DON'T delete what is there! I agree that the article could use more sources! I agree that the article could use more information! So either help contribute to that or stay out of it! DON'T ARBITRARILY DELETE ALL OF MY WORK! sloth_monkey 19:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Burkem

I'd welcome your thoughts on User_talk:Burkem#Undoing_the_damage. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 09:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Merkabah article

Please see discussion in talk page. Thanks. --Shirahadasha 02:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Mashriq

The UAE are considered part of the mashriq; or at least they consider themself to be part of "Al-mashriq al-arabi". Many things in the UAE and Qatar are named after the mashriq. For instance mashriqbank http://www.mashreqbank.com/ which is a UAE bank. The map I have on right now is the closest to "Al-mashriq al-arabi" which its map was published in one of the "Tarikh al-arab" volumes. 68.79.101.136 05:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes this is user Seblini I sent your the last message. You should do some reasearch before contributing to the masriq page. You are probably refereing to Bilad-asham or maybe the levent (term used by europeans which included syria lebanon palestine and jordan) We are talking about a term that was used by arabs accross the arab world hundreds of years ago: the mashriq. Qatar and UAE are considered part of the mashriq. some even consider the whole arab peninsula being part of the mashriq which also includes saudi arabia, yemen and oman. This map is the closest map to the mashriq map that was published in a "tarikh al-arab" volume that dates back to the 1960's. and pelase stop reverting my edits.

Dude I saw the map of the mashriq in a "tarikh al-arab" volume so dude I might have been wrong. so dude stop being so stubborn I was wrong and you were wrong; and thats the correct map.

There is no shuch thing as the english-word mashriq. we are refering to the arabic word mashriq that has been around for several hundered years and which may be used in english conversations. and this word means where the sun rises and it rises in UAE and Qatar before rising in iraq, syria and lebanon. the UAE and qatar are the farthest arabic lands to the east. therefore they are included in what is known as the lands of the mashriq. I don't know if you really beleive that its a good argument when you say "Eastern Arabia" is not the same as Mashriq. Its like saying "middle-east" is not the same as Asia; yes its not the same but part of the middle east is part of Asia just like part of eastern arabia is part of the mashriq. It is very obvious that you don't have a lot of information about this subject and I would appreciate it if you stop making random contributions.

Speech Code

After discussion with another user, I have split the Speech Code article into "Speech Code" and "Speech Code Theory". Hope that clears up the confusion. What happened is I tried to make them two separate articles and they kept getting redirected before I had the chance to clean up both.

RfC on Mattisse/Timmy12

Hello. Just letting you know that an RfC has been opened on Mattisse, here. As it provides strong circumstantial evidence that Timmy12 is a sockpuppet of Mattisse intentionally using two computers to evade checkuser, I thought you might want to comment. I don't really care what side you weigh in on, but I know you've been in a position to observe at least part of the situation and any view would be helpful. —Hanuman Das 12:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I was just notifying anyone who had complained at length on Timmy12's talk page. Wasn't sure who had seen how much of the pattern. —Hanuman Das 14:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Shield of the Trinity

This is very interesting. Looking at the Shield am I not looking at the lower Trinity of the Sephiroth? Power, Glory & Foundation - Netzach, Hod, Yesod? - above the Malkuth - Kingdom? As in 'Thine is the Kingdom, the Power and the Glory'? Inverted, as it is below, it becomes the Higher Trinity, Kether, Chochmah and Binah, which many commentators equate with the Holy Trinity? ThePeg 17:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply to your Comment

I read your comment, and pretty much agree on the large margin's and demography, but I normally use transparency on anything that uses a white b/g simply because if someone decides to put it on a Grey b/g, it still looks somewhat encyclopediac. Or maybe it's just a pet peeve :-D --IAMTHEEGGMAN^{Δdark side} 16:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

The Chrysalids

I thought these issues had been dealt with in the current version, I am unsure what issue you are referring to. PatGallacher 18:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Amazons

why the hostility, AnonMoos? Your current version is acceptable. It may have taken some 'nitpicking' to get us there, welcome to Wikipedia. dab (ᛏ) 07:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Greater Syria

I wonder if you might have some input on this. The current article seems to take it that "Greater Syria" refers exclusively to not merely the greater-Syrian position as a whole, but specifically to the SSNP interpretation of it. I'm not convinced that either is the case, but particularly not the latter (with the implications regarding Iraq, etc). Thanks, Palmiro | Talk 22:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I am no trying to delete your comment

some developer has farked up the database, and it's acting strangely. I have posted to the three times on the Tripoli Six and each time it has been deleted for no reason. Is it edit conflicts turned off or something? Paul Silverman 17:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

to assimilate or not to assimilate?

according to WP:AMOS it seems preferable to assimilate.. see WP:AMOS#Definite_article. the examples of standard transliteration provided also implement assimilation. ITAQALLAH 10:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Sundown town

I think the opening sentence needs to be present tense. It doesn't matter that sundown towns don't really exist anymore--the definition hasn't. If a town exists where certain people are kicked out after a certain time, than by golly, it's a sundown town. Past tense doesn't make sense in a definition. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 22:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays AnonMoos! | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

May you and your family have a Merry Christmas, as well as any other Holiday you may celebrate. I hope that warmth, good cheer, and love surround you during these special days. May God bless you during the Holidays. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

File:Julekort.jpg

.

Wipipedia header

Please stop removing the header from the Wipipedia AfD. This is a closed discussion and it is preferrable that it will remain completely unchanged. I've already answered your concerns over my talk page, so you might want to continue the discussion there. Just keep assuming good faith. Thank you. Michaelas10 (Talk) 12:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Your user talk page doesn't not belong to you, it belong to the Wikimedia Foundation, and everyone retain the right to discuss and post messeges there. Please do not remove my messeges but instead feel free to archive them. You may, however, remove balant attacks from there and organize duplicates. Michaelas10 (Talk) 13:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

I am not a dude dude, i am zanj

Come on now call a truce, How do you know i dont know Arabic. I am "Zanj" my username is --HalaTruth(ሀላካሕ) 02:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC) this is sad you should recognize this and know Ethiopian people speak Arabic and Amharic, in addition we are called Zanj while people in say Mozambique are not called Zanj.--HalaTruth(ሀላካሕ) 02:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)