User talk:Perfectblue97: Difference between revisions
Request for clarification of comment |
→Request for clarification of comment: spent, not worth archiving |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Hi, I'm working on a rewrite of the parapsychology article in my [[User:Annalisa Ventola/Sandbox|Sandbox]]. You are welcome to join us if you have any input. --[[User:Annalisa_Ventola|<span style="color:#000000">Annalisa Ventola</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Annalisa Ventola|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Annalisa_Ventola|Contribs]])</sub> 03:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm working on a rewrite of the parapsychology article in my [[User:Annalisa Ventola/Sandbox|Sandbox]]. You are welcome to join us if you have any input. --[[User:Annalisa_Ventola|<span style="color:#000000">Annalisa Ventola</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Annalisa Ventola|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Annalisa_Ventola|Contribs]])</sub> 03:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Request for clarification of comment == |
|||
I am prepairting a response to your talkpage entry regarding the discussion of variations of the Winx club animated series. May you please define your use of the "commonwealth english" mentioned in your comment?--[[User:Kevin586|Kevin586]] 18:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:19, 19 May 2007
Old Conversations
Award from Dynamo_ace
Keep up the good work!-Dynamo_ace Talk
Award from Jumping cheese
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I hereby award Perfectblue97 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for all the hard work in expanding the Kim Possible pages. Keep it up! Jumping cheese Cont@ct 06:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
A Cookie for you
Whiskey for you
AfD nomination of Joss Possible
An editor has nominated Joss Possible, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joss Possible and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Slim Possible
An editor has nominated Slim Possible, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim Possible and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Parapsychology Article Sandbox
Hi, I'm working on a rewrite of the parapsychology article in my Sandbox. You are welcome to join us if you have any input. --Annalisa Ventola (Talk | Contribs) 03:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)