Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop: Difference between revisions
→H. Roy Cullen photo: new section |
|||
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
<!-- nothing or {{resolved}} or {{Stale|user}} --> |
<!-- nothing or {{resolved}} or {{Stale|user}} --> |
||
<center><gallery> |
<center><gallery> |
||
File:Scout Association of Hong Kong 1950s-1980s.png |
:File:Scout Association of Hong Kong 1950s-1980s.png <!--Non-Free file removed by DASHBot--> |
||
</gallery></center> |
</gallery></center> |
||
Line 380: | Line 380: | ||
<!-- nothing or {{resolved}} or {{Stale|user}} --> |
<!-- nothing or {{resolved}} or {{Stale|user}} --> |
||
<center><gallery> |
<center><gallery> |
||
File:Cedars Scout Association.png |
:File:Cedars Scout Association.png <!--Non-Free file removed by DASHBot--> |
||
</gallery></center> |
</gallery></center> |
||
Revision as of 00:24, 25 March 2010
The Graphics Lab is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages: Illustrations, Photographs and Maps. For questions or suggestions one can use the talk pages: Talk:Graphics Lab, Talk:Illustrations, Talk:Photographs and Talk:Maps.
This specific page is the requests page for the photography workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved for a Wikipedia article. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Advice to requesters |
---|
All requests:
SVG requests:
|
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
For graphists: |
Graphists and other visitors to the Graphics Lab may be interested in the RSS feed of changes to this page. You may find it here. |
Graphists, if you have completed work and have not received a reply from the requester, you may place the {{GL Photography reply}} template on their talk page. |
If you are looking for something to do, there are plenty of images with watermarks to be removed and files that need cleanup. See also our sister Photography workshop at Commons |
Kate Greenaway image
-
Kate Greenaway illustration
-
crop
Article(s): Edmund Evans
Request: Improve resolution and crop out text and side illustration of flowers leaving only the illustration of the girl in the garden. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 03:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done: -Andrew c [talk] 14:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! Looks much better. When taking screenshots, is it best to save as .png or .jpg? Truthkeeper88 (talk) 20:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Image use policy#Rules of thumb #7 discusses that. I guess I should have stayed with PNG, but the optimization wizard in photoshop was making the PNG twice as large as the "high quality" JPG, so that is what I based my choice on. I'd be glad to redo this as a PNG if you, or anyone else, prefers. -Andrew c [talk] 00:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, it's lovely as is and makes the other images in the article look murky. Was just curious when/if I download similar images. Thanks again. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Image use policy#Rules of thumb #7 discusses that. I guess I should have stayed with PNG, but the optimization wizard in photoshop was making the PNG twice as large as the "high quality" JPG, so that is what I based my choice on. I'd be glad to redo this as a PNG if you, or anyone else, prefers. -Andrew c [talk] 00:50, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Silver Wolf Award
Article(s): Silver Wolf Award
Request: Not sure, it just seems fuzzy, can it be sharpened? Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- I've smoothed the pixels throughout the cloth part so as to create a smoother feel, as well as sharpened the edges a bit and retouched some of the coloring to make it more realistic and less faded in appearance. -CamT|C 23:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- After some closer examination, it seemed that what this image needed (besides some retouching) was a lite shadow to help bring out the color, so I've gone ahead and added that in as well, and done a small amount of burning to bring out some of the shadows a bit more. -CamT|C 23:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your attempt, I appreciate it. Kinda going the other direction, without shading, if we can. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Scouting in Yugoslavia
-
retouched
Article(s): Scouting in Yugoslavia
Request: Trim a little off the left hand side, maybe fix staining? Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Not sure if I went a bit overboard or not. You tell me. -Andrew c [talk] 15:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know what the original color was, may have been more sepia, but you did great on fixing the staining! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 00:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Marion Barry
-
Marion Barry
Article(s): Marion Barry
Request: Requesting to change the background to a more neutral color. The current background is kind of "loud", and quite distracting. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Desaturated the background. Original file overwritten but revertable.--Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Request taken by Fred the Oyster.
Done
Passport
-
please give this a rotate
Article(s): Passport
Request: Cleanup, straighten, fix perspective, transparent and/or remove backgrounds and borders... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken by various Wikipedians :).
- Great, just a few more to go! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Done
File:Inside of an azerbaijani passport.JPG|Done
File:Frenchpassportinside.jpg|Done
File:Pasaporteargentino.jpg|Done
File:Turkish Passport First Page.jpg|Done
File:Israel Passport Page.jpg|Done
File:Albanian Italian biometric Passport.JPG|Done
Converted to File:Italian biometric passport.jpg and File:Albanian biometric passport (crop).jpg (see right)
File:Italian biometric passport.jpg|Done
File:Albanian biometric passport (crop).jpg|Done
File:Passport card.jpg|Done
File:Passport of Armenia.jpg
File:DZpasseport.jpg|Done
File:Current cover Cuban passport.JPG|Done
File:Georgian passport.jpg|Done
File:Guyana Passport.png|Done
File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg|Done
File:Is vegabréf.jpg|Done
File:IndianPassportcover.jpg|Done
File:Passport of Montenegro.jpg|Done
File:Nepal-passport-cover-old.jpg|Done
File:PasaporteEspaňol2009.jpg|Done
Commons wouldn't accept the existing filename so new version at File:PasaporteEspaHol2009.jpg
File:PasaporteEspaHol2009.jpg|Done
Commons wouldn't accept the existing filename so this is the new version -I got it to accept the overwrite, can we delete the duplicate?
File:Taiwan ROC Passport.jpg|Done
File:Togolese passport.png|Done
File:TT Passport.jpg|Done
File:Turkish Passport.jpg|Done
(repaired rip too)
File:BiometricVenPassport.jpg|Done
There's too many distortions in too many planes to get it aligned properly. The top text needed 0.55°, the CoA needs 1.43° and the bottom text needs 1.93°. I went with the top as the others distorted too much.
File:Vietnam passport 1998.JPG|Done
File:1. World Passport (Cover).jpg|Done
File:Passport of Saudi Arabia.jpg|remove watermark
Done
File:British new style passport.jpg|Done
St. Patrick's Catholic Church (St. Patrick, Ohio)
-
St. Michael's Catholic Church
Article(s): St. Patrick's Catholic Church (St. Patrick, Ohio)
Request: I believe that I'm using this image properly under fair use; if so, is it permissible to join the two images and treat the combined image as nonfree? As you can see at the article, one is below the other; I'd prefer to have the two images converted into a single image that shows the two churches side-by-side. By the way, if you don't believe it to be permissible, could you help me figure out the coding for showing the two separate files side-by-side? Nyttend (talk) 05:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Making these two images into one would be a bad idea simply due to the fact that there is a drastic difference in dimensions, and you would have to diminish the quality of one of the images to make it symmetrical. -CamT|C 05:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- So it would be a bad idea to have a version of St. Michael's that is 135px high, the same height as the photo of St. Patrick's? Since the point of my proposed image is to compare the churches — can't imagine what else could legitimately be done with this nonfree image — I don't see why my proposal wouldn't be useful. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough: I'm not proposing that you upload a new version of the original of St. Michael's; all I'm suggesting is that you download both images, reduce the one of St. Michael's to the height of the one of St. Patrick's, create a horizontal montage of the two images, and upload. Nyttend (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- We're talking about image quality here. The problem with reducing the larger image is that it will loose it's quality by being reduced. My best suggestion is finding another image of the smaller one that is larger. -CamT|C 16:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Due to the ability to resize thumbnails, we generally discourage collage images (see the infobox collage at Armenians, where there are 6 individual images). Furthermore, this would be a bit confusing on the licensing front, because the old church image is non-free. I think a coding solution to your issue would be better than making a collage, and then having to delete the original (as we cannot have multiple copies of non-free content where one should suffice).-Andrew c [talk] 18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- As Andrew c said – no image montage should be necessary in a case like this (and should generally avoided anyway). Use the template {{multiple image}} to display these two next to each other. —Quibik (talk) 18:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Due to the ability to resize thumbnails, we generally discourage collage images (see the infobox collage at Armenians, where there are 6 individual images). Furthermore, this would be a bit confusing on the licensing front, because the old church image is non-free. I think a coding solution to your issue would be better than making a collage, and then having to delete the original (as we cannot have multiple copies of non-free content where one should suffice).-Andrew c [talk] 18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- We're talking about image quality here. The problem with reducing the larger image is that it will loose it's quality by being reduced. My best suggestion is finding another image of the smaller one that is larger. -CamT|C 16:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- So it would be a bad idea to have a version of St. Michael's that is 135px high, the same height as the photo of St. Patrick's? Since the point of my proposed image is to compare the churches — can't imagine what else could legitimately be done with this nonfree image — I don't see why my proposal wouldn't be useful. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough: I'm not proposing that you upload a new version of the original of St. Michael's; all I'm suggesting is that you download both images, reduce the one of St. Michael's to the height of the one of St. Patrick's, create a horizontal montage of the two images, and upload. Nyttend (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Peter H. Burbett
-
Demo of cleaned up version. 1px median filtering used, right-hand side.
Article(s): Peter Hardeman Burnett
Request: Remove noise, convert to black and white. Please upload it under a new file, however. Thank you. Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
The best time to do this would have been before the crop as to get rid of noise the best way is to use a median filter. Unfortunately that blurs the image and removes detail so you have to sharpen it afterwards to try to get some of the detail back, without,of course, bringing the noise back with it. So the more resolution one has to play with the better. I've downloaded the original pre-cropped version. It's 3am here so I'll leave it for tomorrow unless someone else wants to have a go before I check in tomorrow (today).--Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've uploaded a demo of noise reduction using the median filter, it is subtle but if you look at the eyes you'll see the difference. Personally I prefer the original half-tone noise as it's more natural to the eye. I did take the liberty of cleaning up the stain/crease on the lower right, as well so some other dirt spots. All of these things are un-doable as I used different layers for each stage and used a 16bit version in Lab mode. Which version do you prefer?--Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Incidentally, it's much lighter than the Commons version as the original image had a greyscale calibration bar so I was able to get it close to how it should be. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- May I suggest using Fourier analysis for this task? It will remove most of the interference patterns while preserving the details. (Less-than-perfect JPEG quality will lessen the effectiveness of the method a bit in this case). If you haven't tried this before, Fred, then I recommend giving it a shot; it's a very powerful tool to own, if you're into image restoration! —Quibik (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I didn't know about the FFT filter (which unfortunately doesn't work on a Mac), I have used Colormancer Boundary Noise Reduction filter in the past for the same thing. But if I were doing this restoration for a paying client or for archival purposes I wouldn't use either filter. They're far too drastic. I'm old school, and work on the premise that when restoring the whole idea is to alter as few pixels as possible. Anything more isn't "restoration" but "alteration". It's fine to remove stuff like dirt, scratches, stains, crease etc as they weren't there when the image was created, and of course colour correction. Removing half-tone print patterns is a no-no as far as I'm concerned as that is an original part of the image and is a far too drastic alteration. For me, restoration is the act of getting as close to the original as possible. This is part of the reason I haven't taken part in the Commons restoration projects, apart from it being a 'busman's holiday', I don't agree with the way a lot of it is done. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- May I suggest using Fourier analysis for this task? It will remove most of the interference patterns while preserving the details. (Less-than-perfect JPEG quality will lessen the effectiveness of the method a bit in this case). If you haven't tried this before, Fred, then I recommend giving it a shot; it's a very powerful tool to own, if you're into image restoration! —Quibik (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Incidentally, it's much lighter than the Commons version as the original image had a greyscale calibration bar so I was able to get it close to how it should be. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Tim Cahill
-
Done
Article(s): Tim Cahill (politician)
Request: Crop to only show Tim Cahill (right) - Tyughjbn (talk) 21:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken by Fred the Oyster.
Done
Japanese yen
-
Done
-
Done
White or transparent didn't look right. -
Done
White or transparent didn't look right. -
Done
But due to the 'corona' around the lower one this looks awful with white, transparent or the dark grey I've used.-the corona is the plastic coin holder, can you use black and cut that down too? -
Done
Article(s): Japanese yen
Request: clear or black backgrounds, fix shading... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken by Fred the Oyster.{{Done}}
- the corona is the plastic coin holder, can you use black and cut that down too?
Brown
Article(s): Campbell Brown
Request: First crop the out the words on top of the photo and crop out the bottom part of the skirt. Then please upload, http://www.flickr.com/photos/34457952@N00/3112077307/. Thanks - Tyughjbn (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Not done While the flickr uploader put a creative commons tag on it, the image of Brown is a copyright violation of a CNN photo. We can't use it here. Wine Guy~Talk 04:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Requesting for improving the quality of the following images
-
Lady Gaga on The Monster Ball Tour
-
Lady Gaga on The Monster Ball Tour
-
Retouched
Article(s): Lady Gaga
Request: Please improve the quality of the images, like previously done for File:Gaga on Fame Ball1-edit.jpg. They are recent most images of the artist, but needs the improvement to be included in the infobox. --Legolas (talk2me) 11:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): I've done some work on the second one, someone with more skill can probably enhance it further though. Wine Guy~Talk 18:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the second one. However, the first one is more difficult I believe. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Tommy Douglas
-
Cropped
Article(s): Tommy Douglas
Request: Crop the photo to focus in on his on him and also try to fix the brightness and exposure level. Thanks - Tyughjbn (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): I gave it a try, it's better but probably not good enough. Wine Guy~Talk 00:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Bennett
-
Cropped
Article(s): Carolyn Bennett
Request: Crop the photo on the left and right sides to focus in on her and also try to increase the brightness level a bit. Thank you - Tyughjbn (talk) 2:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done
Here's my attempt. Not sure if you wanted any other changes. Ruminaglass 15:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I did a quick white balance adjustment and fixed color in lower right corner of crop as well. That should do it. Wine Guy~Talk 16:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Scout Association of Hong Kong
Article(s): Scout Association of Hong Kong
Request: remove wooden nickel to focus on central emblem... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Soong May-ling
Request: crop and straighten... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Request taken by Fred the Oyster. Done
- Thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Anna Bergendahl
Article(s): Anna Bergendahl
Request: Change the background to something without the white text (advertisment for an electronics reseller). Don't overwrite the old files. Thank you. Snowflake3 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Ono no Komachi
Article(s): Ono no Komachi
Request: fix side shading... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- I tried to do it without cropping though there is now a slight colour discrepancy on the right-hand side. If this isn't acceptable, let me know and I'll crop it instead. I also sorted a band of shading about 3/4 of the way across from the left. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 13:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
- Fred that's great, thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Barscunes
Article(s): Basques
Request: remove background.. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Ruminaglass.: Removed background and converted to png. Do let me know if you think that the edges need smoothening 18:08, 21 March 2010 Done
- Fantastic, thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Scouting and Guiding in Lebanon
Article(s): Scouting and Guiding in Lebanon
Request: opaque background s/b clear... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Code of Hammurabi
-
Done
Article(s): Code of Hammurabi
Request: clear background... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 06:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Fred the Oyster. Done
Oval portraits of authors as icons for their WP Portals
-
The inspiration
-
Shakespeare (note the existing oval)
-
Done
-
Dickens (please crop to a close up of the head and shoulders)
-
Done
-
Closer in, but more pixellated.
-
Wilde (The background may have to be extended to the left and right for the oval cropping to work)
-
Done
-
Poe (please ignore the existing oval and crop so that it's uniform with the others)
-
Done
Article(s): Portal:Charles Dickens, Portal:Edgar Allan Poe, Portal:Shakespeare, Portal:Oscar Wilde
Request: As a way of tidying up the appearance of the Related portals sections of these portals, it would be good to create a standard shape of icon. I propose that these portraits of authors be cropped into a uniform oval shape, the proportions of which would be based on the Chandos Portrait of William Shakespeare (above, in colour). Ham 11:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Fred the Oyster. Done
Thomas Beecham
Article(s): Thomas Beecham
Request: fix greyscale artifacting... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
Crop sides to produce vertical image
-
Holy Family Catholic Church, Frenchtown, Ohio
-
Vertical crop
Article(s): Holy Rosary Catholic Church (St. Marys, Ohio)
Request: Please crop out both sides to produce a vertical image; I'm planning to use this next to another vertical image, so I'd like both to have the same shape. Please upload under a new name, such as "Holy Family Church, Frenchtown, vertical.jpg", since the horizontal image is presently in use in settings where it's better than my proposed vertical image would be. Nyttend (talk) 02:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Request taken by Jovianeye. Done I have cropped it with an aspect ratio of 3X4. (Hope this is what you want) --JovianEye (talk) 04:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- This is perfect. I needed it for the multiple-image box near the bottom of Holy Rosary Catholic Church (St. Marys, Ohio); the other image is also a vertical image with a 3X4 ratio. Thanks much! Nyttend (talk) 12:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Request: straighten and crop... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s): Done: Fallschirmjäger 10:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Lilangeni
Article(s): Lilangeni
Request: crop, straighten... Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):
H. Roy Cullen photo
-
Black-and-white portrait of H. Roy Cullen
Article(s): Texas Oil Boom
Request: Photo has a little bit of glare to it. Anybody have software that can sharpen the image a little? Mcorazao (talk) 15:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s):