Ahmad Shah Massoud: Difference between revisions
Rv OR. Please do not attack other editors via your edit summary's |
rv predictable tag-team warrior |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Ahmad Shah Massoud''' ({{lang-fa|احمد شاه مسعود}} ''Aḥmad Šāh Mas'ūd''; September 2, 1953 – September 9, 2001) was a political and military leader in [[Afghanistan]]. He was a central figure, known as the "Lion of Panjshir" ({{lang|fa|شیر پنجشیر}}), in the resistance against the [[Soviet war in Afghanistan|Soviet occupation]] between 1979 and 1989, served as the Defense Minister of Afghanistan against the militia of [[Gulbuddin Hekmatyar]] in the early 1990s, and led resistance against [[Mohammed Omar|Mohammed Omar's]] [[Taliban]] regime between 1996 and 2001. Massoud was assassinated on September 9, 2001, two days before the [[attacks of September 11]]. His followers call him ''Āmir Sāhib-e Shahīd'' ("Our Beloved Martyred Commander"). |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Massoud was an Afghan-[[Tajik people|Tajik]] [[Sunni]] [[Muslim]] born in the [[Panjshir Province|Panjshir]], Afghanistan. He studied engineering at [[Kabul University]] when he became involved in the anti-communist resistance. His role as a central leader against the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan earned him the nickname "Lion of Panjshir". Following the withdrawal of [[Soviet war in Afghanistan|Soviet troops from Afghanistan]] the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' named him "the Afghan who won the Cold War".<ref name="Charlie Rose">{{cite web |year=2001 |url =http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2911290068493351924# |title = Charlie Rose March 26, 2001| publisher = [[CBS]]}}</ref> In 1992, he was appointed Minister of Defense for the newly established [[Islamic State of Afghanistan]] by the peace and power-sharing agreement [[Peshawar Accord]]. He led the Islamic State's defense against attacks by [[Gulbuddin Hekmatyar]]'s alliance of militias which were backed by Pakistan and other neighboring countries. Following the rise of the Taliban in 1996, Massoud, who rejected the Taliban's and Al-Qaeda's extremist interpretation of Islam, returned to the role of an armed opposition leader, serving as the military and political leader of the multiethnic [[United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan|United Islamic Front]] (also known in the West as ''Northern Alliance'').<ref name="Webster University Press Book">{{cite book | last = Marcela Grad| authorlink = | title = Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader|edition=March 1, 2009 |page=310 | publisher = Webster University Press| isbn= }}</ref> In 1997, he helped end the civil war in neighboring Tajikistan urging parties to accept a United Nations peace plan.<ref name="Ahmed Rashid, NY Book Review">{{cite news | url =http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/nov/29/tajikistan-next-jihadi-stronghold/| title =Tajikistan: The Next Jihadi Stronghold? | accessdate = | last = Rashid| first = Ahmed| work = | publisher = The New York Review of Books| quote =In the 1980s, the top commander against the Soviets in Afghanistan, Ahmed Shah Massoud, was an Afghan Tajik who helped end the civil war in Tajikistan in 1997, and was assassinated by al-Qaeda just two days before 9/11. | year=2010}}</ref><ref>[http://andre.canessa.pagesperso-orange.fr/lettertogood.htm Prof. Andre Canessa of ''The supporting committee for the Nobel Peace Prize to Ahmad Shah Massoud'']</ref> |
||
⚫ | Massoud was assassinated |
||
⚫ | Massoud was assassinated by two Arab suicide bombers, allegedly belonging to Al-Qaeda, in Afghanistan's [[Takhar Province]] on September 9, 2001, just two days before the [[September 11 attacks]] that caused the US and NATO to invade Afghanistan, allying themselves with Massoud's forces. His earlier effort, together with the most senior leaders of Afghanistan's ethnicities, at forging a wide coalition across political and ethnic factions was instrumental in preparing the ground for the ultimate overthrow of the Taliban in 2001 and the establishment of a multiethnic government. |
||
Massoud was posthumously named "National Hero of Afghanistan" by order of Afghan President [[Hamid Karzai]]. The date of his death, September 9, is observed as a national holiday known as "Massoud Day" in Afghanistan.<ref>[http://www.lonelyplanet.com/worldguide/afghanistan/events Afghanistan Events], Lonely Planet Travel Guide.</ref> Many of his followers see him not only as a military commander but also as a spiritual leader.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> In 2002, he was nominated for the [[Nobel Peace Prize]].<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> |
|||
==Early life== |
==Early life== |
||
Line 105: | Line 109: | ||
Although repeatedly offered the position of prime minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar refused to recognize the peace and power-sharing agreement. His [[Hezb-e Islami]] militia initiated a massive bombardment campaign against the Islamic State and the capital city Kabul. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar received operational, financial and military support from neighboring [[Pakistan]].<ref name="Neamatollah Nojumi">{{Cite book| last =Neamatollah Nojumi | authorlink = | title =The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region|edition=2002 1st |pages=| publisher = Palgrave, New York }}</ref><ref name="Amin Saikal"/> The Director of the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies at the [[Australian National University]], [[Amin Saikal]], writes in ''Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival'' that without Pakistan's support Hekmatyar "would not have been able to target and destroy half of Kabul."<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> Saikal states that Pakistan wanted to install a favorable regime under Hekmatyar in Kabul so that it could use Afghan territory for access to [[Central Asia]].<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> |
Although repeatedly offered the position of prime minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar refused to recognize the peace and power-sharing agreement. His [[Hezb-e Islami]] militia initiated a massive bombardment campaign against the Islamic State and the capital city Kabul. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar received operational, financial and military support from neighboring [[Pakistan]].<ref name="Neamatollah Nojumi">{{Cite book| last =Neamatollah Nojumi | authorlink = | title =The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region|edition=2002 1st |pages=| publisher = Palgrave, New York }}</ref><ref name="Amin Saikal"/> The Director of the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies at the [[Australian National University]], [[Amin Saikal]], writes in ''Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival'' that without Pakistan's support Hekmatyar "would not have been able to target and destroy half of Kabul."<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> Saikal states that Pakistan wanted to install a favorable regime under Hekmatyar in Kabul so that it could use Afghan territory for access to [[Central Asia]].<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> |
||
Hekmatyar's |
Hekmatyar's intense rocket bombardments and the parallel escalation of violent conflict between two militias, Ittihad and Wahdat, which had been able to enter some suburbs of Kabul led to a break-down in law and order. Shia [[Iran]] and Sunni Wahabbi [[Saudi Arabia]] - as competitors for regional [[hegemony]] - encouraged violent conflict between the Ittihad and Wahdat factions. On the one side was the Shia Hazara [[Hezb-i Wahdat]] of [[Abdul Ali Mazari]] and on the other side the Sunni Pashtun [[Ittihad-i Islami]] of [[Abdul Rasul Sayyaf]].<ref name="Human Rights Watch (4)">{{cite web|date= |url =http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2005/07/06/blood-stained-hands|title = Blood-Stained Hands, Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan's Legacy of Impunity | publisher = [[Human Rights Watch]]}}</ref> According to Human Rights Watch, Iran was strongly supporting the Hezb-i Wahdat forces with Iranian intelligence officials providing direct orders while Saudi Arabia supported Sayyaf and his Ittihad-i Islami faction to maximize Wahhabi influence.<ref name="Human Rights Watch (4)"/> Kabul descended into lawlessness and chaos as described in reports by Human Rights Watch and the Afghanistan Justice Project.<ref name="Human Rights Watch (4)"/><ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project">{{cite web |year=2005|url=http://www.afghanistanjusticeproject.org/warcrimesandcrimesagainsthumanity19782001.pdf |title =Casting Shadows: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: 1978-2001 | publisher = Afghanistan Justice Project}}</ref> Massoud's Jamiat commanders, the interim government and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) repeatedly tried to negotiate ceasefires, which broke down in only a few days.<ref name="Human Rights Watch (4)"/> Another militia, the [[Junbish-i Milli]] of former communist general [[Abdul Rashid Dostum]] was backed by Uzbekistan.<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> Uzbek president Karimov was keen to see Dostum controlling as much of Afghanistan as possible especially in the north.<ref name="Amin Saikal"/> Dostum repeatedly changed allegiances. |
||
The Afghanistan Justice Project (AJP) says, that ''"while [Hekmatyar's anti-government] Hizb-i Islami is frequently named as foremost among the factions responsible for the deaths and destruction in the bombardment of Kabul, it was not the only perpetrator of these violations."''<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> According to the AJP, ''"the scale of the bombardment and kinds of weapons used represented disproportionate use of force"'' in a capital city with primarily residential areas by all the factions involved - including the government forces.<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> Crimes were committed by individuals inside the different armed factions. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar released 10,000 dangerous criminals from the main prisons into the streets of Kabul to destabilize the city and cut off Kabul from water, food and energy supplies. The Iran-controlled Wahdat of [[Abdul Ali Mazari]] as well as the Ittihad of [[Abdul Rasul Sayyaf]] supported by Saudi Arabia targeted civilians of the 'opposite side' in systematic atrocities. [[Abdul Rashid Dostum]] allowed crimes as a perceived payment for his troops.<ref name="Human Rights Watch (5)">{{cite web |year=|url=http://www.hrw.org/reports98/afghan/Afrepor0-01.htm#P81_13959|title =II. BACKGROUND | publisher = Human Rights Watch}}</ref> The [[Taliban]], placing Kabul under a two-year siege and bombardment campaign from early 1995 onwards, in later years would commit massacres against civilians compared by [[United Nations]] observers to those that happened during the [[War in Bosnia]].<ref name="Newsday 2001">{{cite news|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-10-12/news/0110120312_1_taliban-fighters-massacres-in-recent-years-mullah-mohammed-omar|title=Taliban massacres outlined for UN |author= Newsday|authorlink= |year=2001|month=October |work=|publisher= Chicago Tribune| accessdate=2011-01-21}}</ref><ref name="papillonsartpalace.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/massacre.htm|title=Confidential UN report details mass killings of civilian villagers |accessdate=2001-10-12|author= Newsday|authorlink= |year=2001|month= |work=|publisher= newsday.org}}</ref> "The major criticism of Massoud's human rights record" is the escalation of the Afshar military operation in 1993.<ref name="Roy Gutman 2"/> |
The Afghanistan Justice Project (AJP) says, that ''"while [Hekmatyar's anti-government] Hizb-i Islami is frequently named as foremost among the factions responsible for the deaths and destruction in the bombardment of Kabul, it was not the only perpetrator of these violations."''<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> According to the AJP, ''"the scale of the bombardment and kinds of weapons used represented disproportionate use of force"'' in a capital city with primarily residential areas by all the factions involved - including the government forces.<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> Crimes were committed by individuals inside the different armed factions. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar released 10,000 dangerous criminals from the main prisons into the streets of Kabul to destabilize the city and cut off Kabul from water, food and energy supplies. The Iran-controlled Wahdat of [[Abdul Ali Mazari]] as well as the Ittihad of [[Abdul Rasul Sayyaf]] supported by Saudi Arabia targeted civilians of the 'opposite side' in systematic atrocities. [[Abdul Rashid Dostum]] allowed crimes as a perceived payment for his troops.<ref name="Human Rights Watch (5)">{{cite web |year=|url=http://www.hrw.org/reports98/afghan/Afrepor0-01.htm#P81_13959|title =II. BACKGROUND | publisher = Human Rights Watch}}</ref> The [[Taliban]], placing Kabul under a two-year siege and bombardment campaign from early 1995 onwards, in later years would commit massacres against civilians compared by [[United Nations]] observers to those that happened during the [[War in Bosnia]].<ref name="Newsday 2001">{{cite news|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-10-12/news/0110120312_1_taliban-fighters-massacres-in-recent-years-mullah-mohammed-omar|title=Taliban massacres outlined for UN |author= Newsday|authorlink= |year=2001|month=October |work=|publisher= Chicago Tribune| accessdate=2011-01-21}}</ref><ref name="papillonsartpalace.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/massacre.htm|title=Confidential UN report details mass killings of civilian villagers |accessdate=2001-10-12|author= Newsday|authorlink= |year=2001|month= |work=|publisher= newsday.org}}</ref> "The major criticism of Massoud's human rights record" is the escalation of the Afshar military operation in 1993.<ref name="Roy Gutman 2"/> A report by the Afghanistan Justice Project describes Massoud as failing to prevent atrocities carried out by his forces and those of their factional ally Ittihad-i Islami against civilians on taking the suburb of Afshar during a [[Afshar operation|military operation]] against an anti-state militia allied to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar shelling residential areas in the capital city in February 1993, arguing that he should have foreseen them.<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> A meeting convened by Massoud on the next day ordered a halt to killing and looting, but that it failed to effectively stop abuses.<ref name="Afghanistan Justice Project"/> Contrary to AJP's own assessment, [[Roy Gutman]] has argued that the witness reports cited in the report implicated only the Ittihad forces, and that these had not been under Massoud's direct command.<ref name="Roy Gutman 2">Gutman, Roy (2008): How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan, Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, 1st ed., Washington D.C., p. 222</ref> |
||
[[Anthony Davis]], who studied and observed Massoud's forces from 1981 to 2001, reported that during the observed period there was ''"no pattern of repeated killings of enemy civilians or military prisoners"'' by Massoud's forces.<ref name="Roy Gutman 2"/> Several other international observers such as author Edward Girardet or John Jennings (Associated Press) who were personally on the ground during the war in Kabul state that in those cases where crimes were committed by individuals fighting inside Massoud's troops, these crimes were the responsibility of corrupted sub-commanders or individuals who used the chaos for their own purposes.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> According to these testimonies, due to a break-down of law and order in Kabul and a war on multiple fronts, Massoud could not control all of his subcommanders during the time in Kabul.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> They further state that Massoud personally had done all in his power to prevent the situation and point out, that after the chaos of Kabul, Massoud was able to control his commanders well during the resistance against the Taliban.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> |
[[Anthony Davis]], who studied and observed Massoud's forces from 1981 to 2001, reported that during the observed period there was ''"no pattern of repeated killings of enemy civilians or military prisoners"'' by Massoud's forces.<ref name="Roy Gutman 2"/> Several other international observers such as author Edward Girardet or John Jennings (Associated Press) who were personally on the ground during the war in Kabul state that in those cases where crimes were committed by individuals fighting inside Massoud's troops, these crimes were the responsibility of corrupted sub-commanders or individuals who used the chaos for their own purposes.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> According to these testimonies, due to a break-down of law and order in Kabul and a war on multiple fronts, Massoud could not control all of his subcommanders during the time in Kabul.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> They further state that Massoud personally had done all in his power to prevent the situation and point out, that after the chaos of Kabul, Massoud was able to control his commanders well during the resistance against the Taliban.<ref name="Webster University Press Book"/> |
Revision as of 15:44, 10 September 2012
Ahmad Shah Massoud | |
---|---|
File:Ahmad Shah Massoud.jpg | |
Nickname(s) | "Lion of Panjshir" |
Born | September 2, 1953 Bazarak, Panjshir, Afghanistan |
Died | September 9, 2001 Takhar Province, Afghanistan | (aged 48)
Service | Military |
Years of service | 1978-2001 † |
Rank | Commander Minister of Defense Vice President of Afghanistan |
Commands | Prominent Mujahideen commander during the Soviet war in Afghanistan, Defense Minister of Afghanistan and commander of the anti-Taliban United Islamic Front |
Battles / wars | Soviet war in Afghanistan War in Afghanistan |
Awards | National Hero of Afghanistan |
Ahmad Shah Massoud (Persian: احمد شاه مسعود Aḥmad Šāh Mas'ūd; September 2, 1953 – September 9, 2001) was a political and military leader in Afghanistan. He was a central figure, known as the "Lion of Panjshir" (شیر پنجشیر), in the resistance against the Soviet occupation between 1979 and 1989, served as the Defense Minister of Afghanistan against the militia of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in the early 1990s, and led resistance against Mohammed Omar's Taliban regime between 1996 and 2001. Massoud was assassinated on September 9, 2001, two days before the attacks of September 11. His followers call him Āmir Sāhib-e Shahīd ("Our Beloved Martyred Commander").
Massoud was an Afghan-Tajik Sunni Muslim born in the Panjshir, Afghanistan. He studied engineering at Kabul University when he became involved in the anti-communist resistance. His role as a central leader against the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan earned him the nickname "Lion of Panjshir". Following the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan the Wall Street Journal named him "the Afghan who won the Cold War".[1] In 1992, he was appointed Minister of Defense for the newly established Islamic State of Afghanistan by the peace and power-sharing agreement Peshawar Accord. He led the Islamic State's defense against attacks by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's alliance of militias which were backed by Pakistan and other neighboring countries. Following the rise of the Taliban in 1996, Massoud, who rejected the Taliban's and Al-Qaeda's extremist interpretation of Islam, returned to the role of an armed opposition leader, serving as the military and political leader of the multiethnic United Islamic Front (also known in the West as Northern Alliance).[2] In 1997, he helped end the civil war in neighboring Tajikistan urging parties to accept a United Nations peace plan.[3][4]
Massoud was assassinated by two Arab suicide bombers, allegedly belonging to Al-Qaeda, in Afghanistan's Takhar Province on September 9, 2001, just two days before the September 11 attacks that caused the US and NATO to invade Afghanistan, allying themselves with Massoud's forces. His earlier effort, together with the most senior leaders of Afghanistan's ethnicities, at forging a wide coalition across political and ethnic factions was instrumental in preparing the ground for the ultimate overthrow of the Taliban in 2001 and the establishment of a multiethnic government.
Massoud was posthumously named "National Hero of Afghanistan" by order of Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The date of his death, September 9, is observed as a national holiday known as "Massoud Day" in Afghanistan.[5] Many of his followers see him not only as a military commander but also as a spiritual leader.[2] In 2002, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.[2]
Early life
Ahmad Shah Massoud was born on September 2, 1953 in Bazarak, Panjshir, Afghanistan.[6] His family lived in Panjshir for several years before moving to Herat where his father, Dost Mohammad Khan, was appointed as the police chief.[6] Later the family moved to the country's capital Kabul where his father served as a colonel in the Afghan Army.[6]
Massoud attented the renowned Franco-Afghan Lycée Esteqlal.[2] Regarded as a gifted student, he studied engineering at Kabul University after his graduation from the Lycée.[6] Massoud spoke Persian, Pashto, Urdu and French and had good English reading skills.[2][6]
In 1973, Mohammed Daoud Khan was brought to power in a coup d'état against the Afghan King and the Republic of Afghanistan was established. The coup was orchestrated by the Parcham faction of the PDPA, the Afghan communist party backed by the Soviet Union. Neamatollah Nojumi writes in The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region:
- "The establishment of the Republic of Afghanistan [in 1973] increased the Soviet investment in Afghanistan and the PDPA influence in the government's military and civil bodies."[7]
These developments gave rise to the Islamist and Islamic movement opposed to the increasing communist and Soviet influence over Afghanistan.[8] During that time, while studying at Kabul University, Massoud became involved with the Sazman-i Jawanan-i Musulman ("Organization of Muslim Youth"), the student branch of the Jamiat-i Islami ("Islamic Society"), whose chairman then was professor Burhanuddin Rabbani.[9] Kabul University was a centre for political debate and activism during that time.[9]
By 1975, after a failed uprising by the Muslim Youth, President Daoud Khan started to dissociate himself from the Soviet Union and the communist party of Afghanistan.[8] According to Roy Gutman, after the failed counter-coup, this "opened a profound and long-lasting schism" among the Islamist and Islamic movement.[8] While Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, an Islamist extremist enjoying the backing of neighboring Pakistan, pushed for continued violent struggle against the Afghan government, Massoud and Rabbani advocated for a peaceful political campaign lobbying officials working for the government and armed forces.[2][8] Heavy disputes between Hekmatyar and Massoud in 1975 reached to such a point that Hekmatyar with the help of two Pakistani agents tried to assassinate Massoud, then 22 years old.[2][8] Massoud escaped pointing two pistols he had carried with him at Hekmatyar.[2][8] A close friend of Massoud, Jaan Mohammad, had been assassinated by Hekmatyar shortly before this incidence.[2]
In 1975, the "Islamic Society" split between supporters of Massoud and Rabbani, who led the Jamiat-i Islami, and elements surrounding Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who then founded the Hezb-i Islami. Akbarzadeh and Yasmeen describe Rabbani's approach as "moderate", "inclusive and gradualist" while they describe Hekmatyar's strategy as "radical" and antagonistic.[9]
The Soviet invasion and PDPA communism
Communist revolution in Afghanistan (1978)
The government of Mohammed Daoud Khan tried to scale back the PDPA's influence dismissing PDPA members from their government posts, appointing conservative elements instead and finally announcing the dissolution of the PDPA arresting senior party members.[7][10]
On April 27, 1978, the PDPA and military units loyal to the PDPA, killed Daoud Khan, his immediate family and bodyguards in a violent coup, and seized control of the capital Kabul.[11] The new PDPA government, led by a revolutionary council, did not enjoy the support of the masses.[12] Therefore it soon announced and implemented a hostile doctrine against any political dissent, whether inside or outside the party.[12]
The PDPA also started reforms along Marxist-Leninist and Soviet lines. The reforms and the PDPA's affinity to the Soviet Union were met with heavy resistance among the population, especially as the government attempted to enforce its Marxist policies by arresting or simply executing those who resisted.[13] Between 50,000 and 100,000 people were arrested and killed by communist troops in the countryside alone.[13] The repression plunged large parts of the country, especially the rural areas, into open revolt against the PDPA government.[14] By spring 1979 unrests had reached 24 out of 28 Afghan provinces including major urban areas. Over half of the Afghan army would either desert or join the insurrection.
Having ascertained that an uprising against the Soviet-backed communists would be supported by the people, Massoud, on July 6, 1979, started an insurrection in the Panjshir which initially failed. Drawing lessons from this failure, Massoud decided to avoid conventional confrontation with larger and better armed government troops and to instead wage a guerrilla war.[15] He subsequently took full control of Panjshir pushing out Afghan communist troops. Oliver Roy writes that in the following period Massoud's "personal prestige and the efficiency of his military organisation persuaded many local commanders to come and learn from him."[16]
Resistance against the Soviet Union (1979-1989)
Widely seen as a guerrilla genius - his country's Che Guevara, with charisma and beard to match - Massoud successfully played David to the Soviets' Goliath in the 1980s.[17]
Following the 1979 invasion and occupation of Afghanistan by Soviet troops, Massoud devised a strategic plan for expelling the invaders and overthrowing the communist regime. The first task was to establish a resistance force which had the hearts and minds of the people. The second phase was one of "active defense" of the Panjshir stronghold, while carrying out asymmetric warfare. The third phase, the "strategic offensive", would see Massoud's forces taking control of large parts of Northern Afghanistan. The fourth phase was the "general application" of Massoud's principles to the whole country, and the final demise of the Afghan communist government.
From the start of the war, Massoud's mujahideen proved to be a thorn in the side for the occupying Soviet forces by ambushing Soviet and Afghan communist convoys travelling through the Salang Pass, resulting in fuel shortages in Kabul.[18] The Soviets mounted a series of offensives against the Panjshir. Between 1980 and 1985, these offensives were conducted twice a year. Yet, despite engaging more men and hardware on each occasion, the Soviets were unable to defeat Massoud's forces. In 1982, the Soviets began deploying major combat units in the Panjshir numbering up to 30,000 men. Massoud pulled his troops back into subsidiary valleys, where they occupied fortified positions. When the Soviet columns advanced onto these positions, they fell into ambushes. When the Soviets withdrew, they handed over their positions to Afghan army garrisons, and Massoud and his mujahideen forces attacked and recaptured them one by one.[19]
In 1983, the Soviets offered Massoud a temporary truce, which he accepted in order to rebuild his own forces and give the civilian population a break from Soviet attacks. He put the respite to good use. In this time he created the Shura-e Nazar (Supervisory Council) which subsequently united 130 commanders from 12 Afghan provinces in their fight against the Soviet army. This council existed outside the fold of the Peshawar parties that were prone to internecine rivalry and bickering, and served to smooth out differences between resistance groups, due to political and ethnic divisions. It was the predecessor of what could have become a unified Islamic Afghan army.[20]
Relations with the party headquarters in Peshawar were often strained, as Rabbani insisted on giving Massoud no more weapons and supplies than to other Jamiat commanders, even those who did little fighting. To compensate for this deficiency, Massoud relied on revenues drawn from exports of emeralds[21] and lapis lazuli,[22] that are traditionally exploited in Northern Afghanistan.
To organize support for the mujahideen, Massoud established an administrative system that enforced law and order (nazm) in areas under his control. The Panjshir was divided into 22 bases (qarargah) governed by a military commander and a civilian administrator, and each had a judge, a prosecutor and a public defender.[23] Massoud's policies were implemented by different committees: an economic committee was charged with funding the war effort. The health committee provided health services, assisted by volunteers from foreign humanitarian non-governmental organizations, such as Aide médicale internationale. An education committee was charged with the training of the military and administrative cadre. A culture committee and a judiciary committee were also created.[24]
This expansion prompted Babrak Karmal to demand that the Red Army resume their offensives, in order to crush the Panjshir groups definitively. However, Massoud had received advance warning of the attack through his intelligence agents in the government and he evacuated all 130,000 inhabitants from the valley into the Hindukush mountains, leaving the Soviet bombings to fall on empty ground and the Soviet battalions once again to face the mountains.[25]
With the defeat of the Soviet-Afghan attacks, Massoud was able to carry out the next phase of his strategic plan, expanding the resistance movement and liberating the northern provinces of Afghanistan. In August 1986, he captured Farkhar in Takhar Province. In November 1986, his forces overran the headquarters of the government's 20th division at Nahrin in Baghlan Province, scoring an important victory for the resistance.[26] This expansion was also carried out through diplomatic means, as more mujahideen commanders were persuaded to adopt the Panjshir military system.
Despite almost constant attacks by the Red Army and the Afghan army, Massoud was able to increase his military strength. Starting in 1980 with a force of less than 1,000 ill-equipped guerillas, the Panjshir valley mujahideen grew to a 5,000-strong force by 1984.[18] After expanding his influence outside the valley, Massoud increased his resistance forces to 13,000 fighters by 1989.[27] These forces were divided into different types of units: the locals (mahalli) were tasked with static defense of villages and fortified positions. The best of the mahalli were formed into units called grup-i zarbati (shock troops), semi-mobile groups that acted as reserve forces for the defense of several strongholds. A different type of unit was the mobile group (grup-i-mutaharek), a lightly equipped commando-like formation numbering 33 men, whose mission was to carry out hit-and-run attacks outside the Panjshir, sometimes as far as 100 km from their base. These men were professional soldiers, well-paid and trained, and, from 1983 on, they provided an effective strike force against government outposts. Uniquely among the mujahideen, these groups wore uniforms, and their use of the pakul made this headwear emblematic of the Afghan resistance.
Massoud's military organization was an effective compromise between the traditional Afghan method of warfare and the modern principles of guerilla warfare that Massoud had learned from the works of Mao Zedong and Che Guevara. His forces were considered the most effective of all the various Afghan resistance movements.[28]
The United States provided Massoud with close to no support. Part of the reason was that it permitted its funding and arms distribution to be administered by Pakistan, which favored rival mujahideen leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In an interview Massoud expressed: "We thought the CIA knew everything. But they didn't. They supported some bad people [meaning Hekmatyar]."[citation needed] Primary advocates for supporting Massoud instead were State Department's Edmund McWilliams and Peter Tomsen, who were on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Others included two Heritage Foundation foreign policy analysts, Michael Johns and James A. Phillips, both of whom championed Massoud as the Afghan resistance leader most worthy of U.S. support under the Reagan Doctrine.[29][30]
Still, the Soviet army and the Afghan communist army were mainly defeated by Massoud and his mujahideen in numerous small engagements between 1984 and 1988. In 1989, after labeling the Soviet Union's military engagement in Afghanistan "a bleeding wound", Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev began a withdrawal of Soviet troops from the nation. On February 15, 1989, in what was depicted as an improbable victory for the mujahideen, the last Soviet soldier left the nation.
Fall of the Afghan communist regime (1992)
After the departure of Soviet troops in 1989, the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan regime, then headed by Mohammad Najibullah, proved unexpectedly capable of holding its own against the mujahideen. Backed by a massive influx of weapons from the Soviet Union, the Afghan armed forces reached a level of performance they had never reached under direct Soviet tutelage and were able to maintain control over all of Afghanistan's major cities. By 1992, however, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the regime began to crumble. Food and fuel shortages undermined the capacities of the government's army, and a resurgence of factionalism split the regime between Khalq and Parcham supporters.[31]
A few days after it was clear that Najibullah had lost control of the nation, his army commanders and governors arranged to turn over authority to resistance commanders and local notables throughout the country. Joint councils (shuras) were immediately established for local government in which civil and military officials of the former government were usually included. In many cases, prior arrangements for transferring regional and local authority had been made between foes.[31]
Collusions between military leaders quickly brought down the Kabul government. In mid-January 1992, within three weeks of the demise of the Soviet Union, Massoud was aware of conflict within the government's northern command. General Abdul Momim, in charge of the Hairatan border crossing at the northern end of Kabul's supply highway, and other non-Pashtun generals based in Mazari Sharif feared removal by Najibullah and replacement by Pashtun officers. The generals rebelled and the situation was taken over by Abdul Rashid Dostum, who held general rank as head of the Jowzjani militia, also based in Mazari Sharif. He and Massoud reached a political agreement, together with another major militia leader, Sayyed Mansour, of the Ismaili community based in Baghlan Province. These northern allies consolidated their position in Mazar-i-Sharif on March 21. Their coalition covered nine provinces in the north and northeast. As turmoil developed within the government in Kabul, there was no government force standing between the northern allies and the major air force base at Bagram, some seventy kilometers north of Kabul. By mid-April 1992, the Afghan air force command at Bagram had capitulated to Massoud.[31] On March 18, 1992, Najibullah announced his willingness to resign, and on April 17, as his government fell apart, he tried to escape but was stopped at Kabul Airport by Dostum's forces. He then took refuge at the United Nations mission, where he remained unharmed as long as Massoud controlled the area surroundig the mission (until 1996).
Senior communist generals and officials of the Najibullah administration acted as a transitional authority to transfer power to Ahmad Shah Massoud's alliance.[32][33] The Kabul interim authority invited Massoud to enter Kabul as the new Head of State, but he held back.[8] Massoud ordered his forces, positioned to the north of Kabul, not to enter the capital until a political solution was in place.[34] He called on all the senior Afghan party leaders, many then based in exile in Peshawar, to work out a political settlement acceptable to all sides and parties.[35]
Pakistani interference and war in Afghanistan (1992-today)
War in Kabul and other parts of the country (1992-1996)
Peace and power-sharing agreement (1992)
The international community in the form of the United Nations and most Afghan political parties decided to appoint a legitimate national government, to succeed communist rule, through an elite settlement among the different resistance parties.[35] While the external Afghan party leaders were meeting in Peshawar, the military situation around Kabul involving the internal commanders was tense. Massoud supported the Peshawar process of establishing a broad coalition government inclusive of all sides, but Hekmatyar sought to become the sole ruler of Afghanistan stating, "In our country coalition government is impossible because, this way or another, it is going to be weak and incapable of stabilizing the situation in Afghanistan."[36] Massoud pertained: "All the parties had participated in the war, in jihad in Afghanistan, so they had to have their share in the government, and in the formation of the government. Afghanistan is made up of different nationalities. We were worried about a national conflict between different tribes and different nationalities. In order to give everybody their own rights and also to avoid bloodshed in Kabul, we left the word to the parties so they should decide about the country as a whole. We talked about it for a temporary stage and then after that the ground should be prepared for a general election."[37]
A recorded radio communication between the two leaders showed the divide as Massoud asked Hekmatyar: "The Kabul regime is ready to surrender, so instead of the fighting we should gather. ... The leaders are meeting in Peshawar. ... The troops should not enter Kabul, they should enter later on as part of the government." Hekmatyar's response: "We will march into Kabul with our naked sword. No one can stop us. ... Why should we meet the leaders?" Massoud answered: "It seems to me that you don't want to join the leaders in Peshawar nor stop your threat, and you are planning to enter Kabul ... in that case I must defend the people."[2]
At that point even Massoud's adversary Osama bin Laden, who had worked extensively with Hekmatyar in Peshawar, urged Hekmatyar to "go back with your brothers" and to accept a compromise with the other resistance parties.[8] But Hekmatyar refused, confident that he would be able to gain sole power in Afghanistan.[8]
On April 24, 1992, the leaders in Peshawar agreed on and signed the Peshawar Accord establishing the post-communist Islamic State of Afghanistan. The Defense Ministry was given to Massoud while the Prime Ministership was given to Hekmatyar. Hekmatyar refused to sign. With the exception of Hekmatyar's Hezb-e Islami, all of the other parties were unified under this peace and power-sharing accord in April 1992.
War against Hekmatyar (1992-1995)
Although repeatedly offered the position of prime minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar refused to recognize the peace and power-sharing agreement. His Hezb-e Islami militia initiated a massive bombardment campaign against the Islamic State and the capital city Kabul. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar received operational, financial and military support from neighboring Pakistan.[7][35] The Director of the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies at the Australian National University, Amin Saikal, writes in Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival that without Pakistan's support Hekmatyar "would not have been able to target and destroy half of Kabul."[35] Saikal states that Pakistan wanted to install a favorable regime under Hekmatyar in Kabul so that it could use Afghan territory for access to Central Asia.[35]
Hekmatyar's intense rocket bombardments and the parallel escalation of violent conflict between two militias, Ittihad and Wahdat, which had been able to enter some suburbs of Kabul led to a break-down in law and order. Shia Iran and Sunni Wahabbi Saudi Arabia - as competitors for regional hegemony - encouraged violent conflict between the Ittihad and Wahdat factions. On the one side was the Shia Hazara Hezb-i Wahdat of Abdul Ali Mazari and on the other side the Sunni Pashtun Ittihad-i Islami of Abdul Rasul Sayyaf.[38] According to Human Rights Watch, Iran was strongly supporting the Hezb-i Wahdat forces with Iranian intelligence officials providing direct orders while Saudi Arabia supported Sayyaf and his Ittihad-i Islami faction to maximize Wahhabi influence.[38] Kabul descended into lawlessness and chaos as described in reports by Human Rights Watch and the Afghanistan Justice Project.[38][39] Massoud's Jamiat commanders, the interim government and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) repeatedly tried to negotiate ceasefires, which broke down in only a few days.[38] Another militia, the Junbish-i Milli of former communist general Abdul Rashid Dostum was backed by Uzbekistan.[35] Uzbek president Karimov was keen to see Dostum controlling as much of Afghanistan as possible especially in the north.[35] Dostum repeatedly changed allegiances.
The Afghanistan Justice Project (AJP) says, that "while [Hekmatyar's anti-government] Hizb-i Islami is frequently named as foremost among the factions responsible for the deaths and destruction in the bombardment of Kabul, it was not the only perpetrator of these violations."[39] According to the AJP, "the scale of the bombardment and kinds of weapons used represented disproportionate use of force" in a capital city with primarily residential areas by all the factions involved - including the government forces.[39] Crimes were committed by individuals inside the different armed factions. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar released 10,000 dangerous criminals from the main prisons into the streets of Kabul to destabilize the city and cut off Kabul from water, food and energy supplies. The Iran-controlled Wahdat of Abdul Ali Mazari as well as the Ittihad of Abdul Rasul Sayyaf supported by Saudi Arabia targeted civilians of the 'opposite side' in systematic atrocities. Abdul Rashid Dostum allowed crimes as a perceived payment for his troops.[40] The Taliban, placing Kabul under a two-year siege and bombardment campaign from early 1995 onwards, in later years would commit massacres against civilians compared by United Nations observers to those that happened during the War in Bosnia.[41][42] "The major criticism of Massoud's human rights record" is the escalation of the Afshar military operation in 1993.[43] A report by the Afghanistan Justice Project describes Massoud as failing to prevent atrocities carried out by his forces and those of their factional ally Ittihad-i Islami against civilians on taking the suburb of Afshar during a military operation against an anti-state militia allied to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar shelling residential areas in the capital city in February 1993, arguing that he should have foreseen them.[39] A meeting convened by Massoud on the next day ordered a halt to killing and looting, but that it failed to effectively stop abuses.[39] Contrary to AJP's own assessment, Roy Gutman has argued that the witness reports cited in the report implicated only the Ittihad forces, and that these had not been under Massoud's direct command.[43]
Anthony Davis, who studied and observed Massoud's forces from 1981 to 2001, reported that during the observed period there was "no pattern of repeated killings of enemy civilians or military prisoners" by Massoud's forces.[43] Several other international observers such as author Edward Girardet or John Jennings (Associated Press) who were personally on the ground during the war in Kabul state that in those cases where crimes were committed by individuals fighting inside Massoud's troops, these crimes were the responsibility of corrupted sub-commanders or individuals who used the chaos for their own purposes.[2] According to these testimonies, due to a break-down of law and order in Kabul and a war on multiple fronts, Massoud could not control all of his subcommanders during the time in Kabul.[2] They further state that Massoud personally had done all in his power to prevent the situation and point out, that after the chaos of Kabul, Massoud was able to control his commanders well during the resistance against the Taliban.[2]
"Massoud was always talking to his people about not behaving badly; he told them that they were accountable to their God. But because of the rocket attacks on the city the number of troops had to be increased, so there were ten or twelve thousand troops from other sources that came in ... He [Massoud] not only did not order any [crimes], but he was deeply distressed by them. I remember once ... Massoud commented that some commanders were behaving badly, and said that he was trying to bring them to justice ..."[2]
— Eng. Mohammad Eshaq, in "Massoud" (Webster University Press 2009)
In 1993, Massoud created the Cooperative Mohammad Ghazali Culture Foundation ("Bonyad-e Farhangi wa Ta'wani Mohammad-e Ghazali") to further humanitarian assistance and politically independent Afghan culture.[2][44] The Ghazali Foundation provided free medical services during some days of the week to residents of Kabul who were unable to pay for medical treatment themselves.[2] The Ghazali Foundation's department for distribution of auxiliary goods was the first partner of the Red Cross. The Ghazali Foundation's department of family consultation was a free advisory board, which was accessible seven days a week for the indigent. Although Massoud was responsible for the financing of the foundation, he did not interfere into its cultural work. A council led the foundation and a jury consisting of impartial university lecturers decided on the works of artists. The Ghazali foundation enabled Afghan artists to exhibit their works at different places in Kabul and numerous artists and authors were honoured for their works; some of them neither proponents of Massoud nor the Islamic State government.
In March 1993, Massoud resigned his government position in exchange for peace, as requested by Hekmatyar who saw Massoud as a personal rival.[2][32][36] According to the Islamabad Accord, Burhanuddin Rabbani, belonging to the same party as Massoud, remained president while Gulbuddin Hekmatyar took the long-offered position of prime minister. Only two days after the Islamabad Accord was put into effect, however, Hekmatyar's allies of Hezb-e Wahdat were again rocketing areas in Kabul. Both the Wahhabi Pashtun Ittehad-i Islami of Abdul Rasul Sayyaf backed by Saudi Arabia and the Shia Hazara Hezb-e Wahdat supported by Iran remained involved in heavy fighting against each other.[32] Hekmatyar proved afraid to enter Kabul proper, chairing only one cabinet meeting. Pulitzer Prize-winning author Roy Gutman of the United States Institute of Peace wrote in How We Missed the Story: Osama bin Laden, the Taliban, and the Hijacking of Afghanistan:
Hekmatyar had become prime minister ... But after chairing one cabinet meeting, Hekmatyar never returned to the capital, fearing, perhaps, a lynching by Kabulis infuriated over his role in destroying their city. Even his close aides were embarrassed. Hekmatyar spokesman Qutbuddin Helal was still setting up shop in the prime minister's palace when the city came under Hezb[-i Islami] rocket fire late that month. "We are here in Kabul and he is rocketing us. Now we have to leave. We can't do anything," he told Massoud aides.[8]
Hekmatyar, who was generally opposed to coalition government but strived for undisputed power, had disputes with other parties over the selection of cabinet members and again started to launch major attacks against Kabul for one month.[32][36] The President, Burhanuddin Rabbani, was attacked when he attempted to meet Hekmatyar.[32] Massoud resumed his responsibilities as minister of defense.
In May 1993, a new attempt was made to reinstate the Islamabad Accord.[32] In August, Massoud again extented a hand to Hekmatyar in an attempt to broaden the government.[32][45] By the end of 1993, however, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and former communist general and militia leader, Abdul Rashid Dostum, were involved in secret negotiations encouraged by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, Iran's intelligence service and Uzbekistan's Karimov administration.[34][45] They planned a coup to oust the Rabbani administration and to attack Massoud in his northern areas.[32][34]
In January 1994, Hekmatyar and Dostum mounted a destructive bombardment campaign against the capital and attacked Massoud's core areas in the northeast.[32][34] Amin Saikal writes, Hekmatyar had the following objectives in all his operations including this attempted coup: "The first was to make sure that Rabbani and Massoud were not allowed to consolidate power, build a credible administration, or expand their territorial control, so that the country would remain divided into small fiefdoms, run by various Muajhideen leaders and local warlords or a council of such elements, with only some of them allied to Kabul. The second was to ensure the Rabbani government acquired no capacity to dispense patronage, and to dissuade the Kabul population from giving more than limited support to the government. The third was to make Kabul an unsafe city for representatives of the international community and to prevent the Rabbani government from attracting the international support needed to begin the post-war reconstruction of Afghanistan and generate a level of economic activity which would enhance its credibility and popularity."[36]
By mid-1994, Hekmatyar and Dostum were on the defensive in Kabul against Islamic State forces led by Massoud. By early 1995, the Islamic State had been able to secure the capital.[33] Bombardment of the capital came to a halt.[39][46][47] The government began to restore some law and order, and to start basic public services. Massoud initiated a nationwide political process with the goal of national consolidation and democratic elections.[2] But the Taliban, which had emerged over the course of 1994 in southern Afghanistan, were already at the doors of the capital city.
Southern Afghanistan had been neither under the control of foreign-backed militias nor the government in Kabul, but was ruled by local Pashtun leaders such as Gul Agha Sherzai and their militias. In 1994, the Taliban (a movement originating from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-run religious schools for Afghan refugees in Pakistan) also developed in Afghanistan as a politico-religious force, reportedly in opposition to the tyranny of the local governor.[48] When the Taliban took control of Kandahar in 1994, they forced the surrender of dozens of local Pashtun leaders who had presided over a situation of complete lawlessness and atrocities.[40] In 1994, the Taliban took power in several provinces in southern and central Afghanistan.
Taliban siege of Kabul (1995-1996)
As the Islamic State had been able to consolidate control over the capital, the government took steps to restore law and order. Courts started to work again also convicting individuals inside government troops who had committed crimes.[49] Massoud initiated a nationwide political process with the goal of national consolidation and democratic elections. He arranged a conference in three parts uniting political and cultural personalities, governors, commanders, clergymen and representatives, in order to reach a lasting agreement. Massoud, like most people in Afghanistan, saw this conference as a small hope for democracy and for free elections. His favourite for candidacy to the presidency was Dr. Mohammad Yusuf, the first democratic prime minister under Zahir Shah, the former king. In the first meeting representatives from 15 different Afghan provinces met, in the second meeting there were already 25 provinces participating.
Massoud also invited the Taliban to join the peace process wanting them to be a partner in providing stability to Afghanistan during such a process.[2] Against the advice of his security personnel, he went to talk to some Taliban leaders in Maidan Shar, Taliban territory. The Taliban declined to join the peace process leading towards general elections. When Massoud returned to Kabul unharmed, the Taliban leader who had received him as his guest paid with his life: he was killed by other senior Taliban for failing to assassinate Massoud while the possibility had presented itself.
Neighboring Pakistan exerted strong influence over the Taliban. A publication with the George Washington University describes: "Initially, the Pakistanis supported ... Gulbuddin Hekmatyar ... When Hekmatyar failed to deliver for Pakistan, the administration began to support a new movement of religious students known as the Taliban."[50] Many analysts like Amin Saikal describe the Taliban as developing into a proxy force for Pakistan's regional interests which the Taliban decline.[35] The Taliban started shelling Kabul in early 1995 but were defeated by forces of the Islamic State government under Ahmad Shah Massoud.[46] (see video) Amnesty International, referring to the Taliban offensive, wrote in a 1995 report:
"This is the first time in several months that Kabul civilians have become the targets of rocket attacks and shelling aimed at residential areas in the city."[46]
— Amnesty International, 1995
The Taliban's early victories in 1994 were followed by a series of defeats that resulted in heavy losses.[40] The Taliban's first major offensive against the important western city of Herat, under the rule of Islamic state ally Ismail Khan, in February 1995 was defeated when Massoud airlifted 2,000 of his own core forces from Kabul to help defend Herat.[51] Ahmed Rashid writes: "The Taliban had now been decisively pushed back on two fronts by the government and their political and military leadership was in disarray. Their image as potential peacemakers was badly dented, for in the eyes of many Afghans they had become nothing more than just another warlord party."[51] International observers already speculated that the Taliban as a country-wide organization might have "run its course".[52]
Mullah Omar, however, consolidated his control inside the Taliban and with foreign help rebuild and equipped his forces.[53] Pakistan increased its support to the Taliban.[35][54] Its military advisers oversaw the restructuring of Taliban forces. The country provided armored pick-up trucks and other military equipment.[52] Saudi Arabia provided the funding.[55] Furthermore, there was a massive influx of 25,000 new Taliban fighters, many of them recruited in Pakistan.[53] This enabled the Taliban to capture Herat to the west of Kabul in a surprise attack against the forces of Ismail Khan in September 1995. A nearly one-year siege and bombardment campaign against Kabul, however, was again defeated by Massoud's forces.[55]
Massoud and Rabbani meanwhile kept working on an internal Afghan peace process - successfully. By February 1996, all of Afghanistan's armed factions - except for the Taliban - had agreed to take part in the peace process and to set up a peace council to elect a new interim president.[56] Many Pashtun areas under Taliban control had representatives also advocating for a peace agreement with the Islamic State government.[57] But Taliban leader Mullah Omar and the Kandaharis surrounding him wanted to expand the war.[57] At that point the Taliban leadership and their foreign supporters decided they needed to act quickly before the government could consolidate the new understanding between the parties. The Taliban moved against Jalalabad, under the control of the Pashtun Jalalabad Shura, to the east of Kabul. Part of the Jalalabad Shura was bribed with millions of dollars by the Taliban's foreign sponsors, especially Saudi Arabia, to vacate their positions.[58] The Taliban's battle for Jalalabad was directed by Pakistani military advisers. Hundreds of Taliban crossed the Afghan-Pakistani border moving on Jalalabad from Pakistan and thereby suddenly placed to the east of Kabul.[58] This left the capital city Kabul "wide open"[58] to many sides as Ismail Khan had been defeated to the west, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar had vacated his positions to the south and the fall and surrender of Jalalabad had suddenly opened a new front to the east. At that point Massoud decided to conduct a strategic retreat through a northern corridor, according to Ahmed Rashid, "knowing he could not defend [Kabul] from attacks coming from all four points of the compass. Nor did he want to lose the support of Kabul's population by fighting for the city and causing more bloodshed."[58] On September 26, 1996, as the Taliban with military support by Pakistan and financial support by Saudi Arabia prepared for another major offensive, Massoud ordered a full retreat from Kabul.[59] The Taliban marched into Kabul on September 27, 1996, and established the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Massoud and his troops retreated to the northeast of Afghanistan which became the base for the still internationally recognized Islamic State of Afghanistan.[60][61][62]
Resistance against the Taliban (1996-2001)
United Front against the Taliban
Ahmad Shah Massoud created the United Front (Northern Alliance) against the Taliban that were preparing offensives against the areas under the control of Massoud and against those under the control of other regional leaders. (see video) The United Front included forces and leaders from different political backgrounds as well as from all ethnicities of Afghanistan including Tajiks, Pashtuns, Uzbeks, Hazaras or Turkmens. From the Taliban conquest in 1996 until November 2001 the United Front controlled territory in which roughly 30% of Afghanistan's population was living in provinces such as Badakhshan, Kapisa, Takhar and parts of Parwan, Kunar, Nuristan, Laghman, Samangan, Kunduz, Ghōr and Bamyan.
Massoud did not intend for the United Front to become the ruling government of Afghanistan. His vision was for the United Front to help establish a new government, where the various ethnic groups would share power and live in peace through a democratic form of government. Massoud told Roger L. Plunk, George Washington University author of the Wandering Peacemaker and international mediator, that his dream was of "an Afghanistan at peace with itself, and of the Panjshir Valley, which had been stripped of many of its trees, being once again full of flowering almond trees and laughing children."[2]
Meanwhile, the Taliban imposed on the parts of Afghanistan under their control their political and judicial interpretation of Islam issuing edicts forbidding women to work outside the home, attend school, or to leave their homes unless accompanied by a male relative.[63]
"To PHR's knowledge, no other regime in the world has [like the Taliban do] methodically and violently forced half of its population into virtual house arrest, prohibiting them on pain of physical punishment...."[63]
— Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), in "The Taliban's War on Women" (1998)
Women were required to wear the all-covering Afghan burqa, denied access to health care and education, windows needed to be covered so that women could not be seen from the outside and they were not allowed to laugh in a manner they could be heard by others.[63] The Taliban, without any real judicial process, cut people's hands or arms off when accused of stealing.[63] Taliban hit-squads watched the streets conducting arbitrary brutal public beatings.[63]
The Taliban and their allies committed systematic massacres against Afghan civilians,[41][42][64] denied UN food supplies to 160,000 starving civilians[65] and conducted a policy of scorched earth burning vast areas of fertile land and destroying tens of thousands of homes.[66][67][68][69] Several Taliban and Al-Qaeda commanders ran a network of human trafficking, abducting women and selling them into slavery and forced prostitution in Afghanistan and Pakistan.[70] Time Magazine writes: "The Taliban often argued that the brutal restrictions they placed on women were actually a way of revering and protecting the opposite sex. The behavior of the Taliban during the six years they expanded their rule in Afghanistan made a mockery of that claim."[70] In April 2001, the Taliban, similarly to Nazi procedures, issued an edict requiring Afghan Hindus to wear marks of identification when leaving their homes.[71] Hindus also were ordered to display a yellow flag on their houses and were not allowed to reside in the same houses as Muslims.[71] Hundreds of thousands of people were forced to flee to United Front-controlled territory, Pakistan and Iran.[67]
UN officials stated that there had been "15 massacres" by the Taliban between 1996 and 2001 and that "[t]hese have been highly systematic and they all lead back to the [Taliban] Ministry of Defense or to Mullah Omar himself."[41][42] "These are the same type of war crimes as were committed in Bosnia and should be prosecuted in international courts", one UN official was quoted as saying.[41] The documents also reveal the role of Arab and Pakistani support troops in these killings.[41][42]
From 1996 to 2001 there was a large influx of foreign fighters, especially Arab militants belonging to the Al-Qaeda organization led by Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. Al-Qaeda allied itself with the Taliban emirate in exchange for receiving a safe haven in Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda became a state within the Taliban-controlled areas.[72] Bin Laden sent thousands of Arab recruits to join the fight against Massoud's United Front.[72][73] His so-called 055 Brigade was responsible for mass killings of Afghan civilians.[74] A report by the United Nations quotes eyewitnesses in many villages describing Arab fighters "carrying long knives used for slitting throats and skinning people".[41][42]
Besides Al-Qaeda, according to Pakistani Afghanistan expert Ahmed Rashid, "between 1994 and 1999, an estimated 80,000 to 100,000 Pakistanis trained and fought in Afghanistan" on the side of the Taliban.[75] Peter Tomsen stated that up until 9/11 Pakistani military and ISI officers along with thousands of regular Pakistani armed forces personnel had been involved in the fighting in Afghanistan.[76] In 2001 alone, according to several international sources, 28,000-30,000 Pakistani nationals, 14,000-15,000 Afghan Taliban and 2,000-3,000 Al Qaeda militants were fighting against anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan as a roughly 45,000 strong military force.[2][74][77] In 1998, Iran accused Pakistan of sending its air force to bomb Mazar-i-Sharif in support of Taliban forces and directly accused Pakistani troops for "war crimes at Bamiyan".[78] The same year Russia said, Pakistan was responsible for the "military expansion" of the Taliban in northern Afghanistan by sending large numbers of Pakistani troops some of whom had subsequently been taken as prisoners by the anti-Taliban United Front.[79] In 2000, the UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo against military support to the Taliban, with UN officials explicitly singling out Pakistan. The UN secretary-general implicitly criticized Pakistan for its military support and the Security Council stated it was "deeply distress[ed] over reports of involvement in the fighting, on the Taliban side, of thousands of non-Afghan nationals."[80] In July 2001, several countries including the United States, accused Pakistan of being "in violation of U.N. sanctions because of its military aid to the Taliban."[81]
In total, estimates range up to one million people fleeing the Taliban, Al Qaeda and their allies.[82] Many civilians fled to the area of Ahmad Shah Massoud.[83][84] National Geographic concluded in its documentary "Inside the Taliban":
"The only thing standing in the way of future Taliban massacres is Ahmad Shah Massoud."[83]
— National Geographic, "Inside the Taliban"
In 1998, after the defeat of Abdul Rashid Dostum's faction in Mazar-i-Sharif, Ahmad Shah Massoud remained the only main leader of the United Front in Afghanistan and the only leader who was able to defend vast parts of his area against the Taliban. Most major leaders including the Islamic State's President Burhanuddin Rabbani, Abdul Rashid Dostum, and others were living in exile. The Taliban repeatedly offered Massoud a position of power to make him stop his resistance. Massoud declined. He explained in one interview:
"The Taliban say: 'Come and accept the post of prime minister and be with us', and they would keep the highest office in the country, the presidentship. But for what price?! The difference between us concerns mainly our way of thinking about the very principles of the society and the state. We can not accept their conditions of compromise, or else we would have to give up the principles of modern democracy. We are fundamentally against the system called 'the Emirate of Afghanistan'."[85]
— Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
"There should be an Afghanistan where every Afghan finds himself or herself happy. And I think that can only be assured by democracy based on consensus."[86]
— Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
Massoud wanted to convince the Taliban to join a political process leading towards democratic elections in a foreseeable future.[85][87] His proposals for peace can be seen here: Proposal for Peace, promoted by Commander Massoud. He also stated:
"The Taliban are not a force to be considered invincible. They are distanced from the people now [in 2001]. They are weaker than in the past. There is only the assistance given by Pakistan, Osama bin Laden and other extremist groups that keep the Taliban on their feet. With a halt to that assistance, it is extremely difficult to survive."[86]
— Ahmad Shah Massoud, 2001
American journalist Sebastian Junger who frequently travels to war zones stated in March 2001:
"They [the Taliban] receive a tremendous amount of support by Pakistan... without that involvement by Pakistan the Taliban would really be forced to negotiate...."[1]
— Sebastian Junger, on 'Charlie Rose' (2001)
In early 2001, the United Front employed a new strategy of local military pressure and global political appeals.[88] Resentment was increasingly gathering against Taliban rule from the bottom of Afghan society including the Pashtun areas.[88] At the same time Massoud was very wary not to revive the failed Kabul government of the early 1990s.[88] Already in 1999 the United Front leadership ordered the training of police forces specifically to keep order and protect the civilian population in case the United Front would be successful.[2]
Cross-factional negotiations
From 1999 onwards a renewed process was set into motion by the Tajik Ahmad Shah Massoud and the Pashtun Abdul Haq to unite all the ethnicities of Afghanistan. Massoud united the Tajiks, Hazara and Uzbeks as well as several Pashtun commanders under his United Front. Besides meeting with Pashtun tribal leaders and acting as a point of reference, Abdul Haq received increasing numbers of Pashtun Taliban themselves who were secretly approaching him.[89] Some commanders which had worked for the Taliban military apparatus agreed to the plan to topple the Taliban regime[90] as the Taliban lost support even among the Pashtuns. Senior diplomat and Afghanistan expert Peter Tomsen wrote that "[t]he ‘Lion of Kabul’ [Abdul Haq] and the ‘Lion of Panjshir’ [Ahmad Shah Massoud] would make a formidable anti-Taliban team if they combined forces. Haq, Massoud, and Karzai, Afghanistan’s three leading moderates, could transcend the Pashtun—non-Pashtun, north-south divide."[91] The senior Hazara and Uzbek leaders took part in the process just like later Afghan president Hamid Karzai. They agreed to work under the banner of the exiled Afghan king Zahir Shah in Rome.
In November 2000, leaders from all ethnic groups were brought together in Massoud's headquarters in northern Afghanistan travelling from other parts of Afghanistan, Europe, the United States, Pakistan and India to discuss a Loya Jirga for a settlement of Afghanistan's problems and to discuss the establishment of a post-Taliban government.[92][93] In September 2001 an international official who met with representatives of the alliance would remark, "It's crazy that you have this today ... Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazara ... They were all ready to buy in to the process".[94]
In early 2001 Ahmad Shah Massoud with leaders from all ethnicities of Afghanistan addressed the European Parliament in Brussels, asking the international community to provide humanitarian aid to the people of Afghanistan.[95] He stated that the Taliban and Al Qaeda had introduced "a very wrong perception of Islam" and that without the support of Pakistan and Bin Laden the Taliban would not be able to sustain their military campaign for up to a year.[82] On this visit to Europe he also warned that his intelligence had gathered information about a large-scale attack on U.S. soil being imminent.[96]
The areas of Massoud
Life in the areas under direct control of Massoud was different from the life in the areas under Taliban or i. e. Dostum's control. In contrast to the time of chaos in which all structures had collapsed in Kabul, Massoud was able to control his troops very well during the period starting in late 1996. Human Rights Watch notes no human rights crimes for Massoud's troops in the period from October 1996 until the assassination of Massoud in September 2001.Massoud always controlled the Panjshir, Takhar, parts of Parwan and Badakhshan during the war. Some other provinces (notably Kunduz, Baghlan, Nuristan and the north of Kabul) were captured by his forces from the Taliban and lost again from time to time as the frontlines varied.
Massoud created democratic institutions which were structured into several committees: political, health, education and economic.[2] Still, many people came to him personally when they had a dispute or problem and asked him to solve their problems.[2]
Massoud also signed the Women's Rights Declaration. In the area of Massoud, women and girls did not have to wear the Afghan burqa by law. They were allowed to work and to go to school. Although it was a time of war, girl schools were operating in some districts. In at least two known instances, Massoud personally intervened against cases of forced marriage in favour of the women to make their own choice.[2]
It is our conviction and we believe that both men and women are created by the Almighty. Both have equal rights. Women can pursue an education, women can pursue a career, and women can play a role in society -- just like men.[2]
While it was Massoud's stated personal conviction that men and women are equal and should enjoy the same rights, he also had to deal with Afghan traditions which he said would need a generation or more to overcome. In his opinion that could only be achieved through education.[2] Author Pepe Escobar wrote in Massoud: From Warrior to Statesman:
"Massoud is adamant that in Afghanistan women have suffered oppression for generations. He says that 'the cultural environment of the country suffocates women. But the Taliban exacerbate this with oppression.' His most ambitious project is to shatter this cultural prejudice and so give more space, freedom and equality to women -- they would have the same rights as men."[2]
— Pepe Escobar, in 'Massoud: From Warrior to Statesman'
Humayun Tandar, who took part as an Afghan diplomat in the 2001 International Conference on Afghanistan in Bonn, said that "strictures of language, ethnicity, region were [also] stifling for Massoud. That is why ... he wanted to create a unity which could surpass the situation in which we found ourselves and still find ourselves to this day."[2] This applied also to strictures of religion. Jean-José Puig describes how Massoud often led prayers before a meal or at times asked his fellow Muslims to lead the prayer but also did not hesitate to ask the Jewish Princeton Professor Michael Barry or his Christian friend Jean-José Puig: "Jean-José, we believe in the same God. Please, tell us the prayer before lunch or dinner in your own language."[2]
International relations
U.S. policy regarding Massoud, the Taliban and Afghanistan remains ambiguous and differed between the various U.S. government agencies.
In 1997, U.S. State Department's Robin Raphel suggested to Massoud he should surrender to the Taliban. He soundly rejected the proposal.[citation needed]
At one point in the war, in 1997, the Taliban were vulnerable and the road to the capital, Kabul, was wide open. Two top foreign policy officials in the Clinton administration flew to northern Afghanistan to convince - without success - the United Front not to take advantage of an opportunity to make crucial gains against the Taliban.[97] Before the United Front could strike, Assistant Secretary of State Rick Indefurth and American U.N. Ambassador Bill Richardson flew to northern Afghanistan and tried to convince the leadership of the United Front that this was not the time for an offensive.[97] Instead, they insisted this was the time for a cease-fire and an arms embargo. At the same time Pakistanis began a "Berlin-like airlift to resupply and re-equip the Taliban", financed with Saudi money.[97]
On another note an analyst with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Julie Sirrs, had visited Afghanistan, but only in those areas controlled by the Taliban. After returning, she had realized that this was a one-dimensional view of Afghanistan and there were gaping holes in the DOD's understanding of the situation. In 1998, she requested to officially go back to northern Afghanistan to the areas controlled by Commander Massoud.[97] Subsequently she was denied the permission to go there.[97] So she went to the Panjshir Valley on her vacation and paid the journey on herself (in 1998). U.S. congressman Dana Rohrabacher describes:
"When she got to the Panjshir Valley, she found... something vital to America's security was happening, something she was not really able to discover when she visited the Taliban-controlled areas before. Commander Massoud told her that he was facing a new enemy in Afghanistan [meaning foreign esp. Arab forces].... Apparently, bin Laden, who was making Afghanistan into his base of operations, was importing Islamic radicals from all over the world, training them as terrorists and killers and then sending them up against Massoud's troops.... She only had a short time, but she collected enough information for a preliminary report, and she headed home. The minute she got back, she found herself under severe restrictions at the Defense Intelligence Agency and restricted to whom she could brief or show any of her reports.... The commanding officer of the DIA labeled her as insubordinate, he fired her; and when she fought her dismissal, he set out to destroy her. Amidst the fight to save her job, the DIA commanding officer told her what really upset him most was her contact with Massoud, who, according to the DIA general, was one of the bad guys. This general was sending his people to be briefed by the Taliban, but any contact with Massoud was a cause for dismissal.... It was a mind set of the man who headed the Defense Intelligence Agency. Something is terribly wrong with this picture."[97]
— U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, to U.S. Congress in 2004
In the meantime, the only collaboration between Massoud and another U.S. intelligence service, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), consisted of an effort to trace Osama bin Laden following the 1998 embassy bombings.[98] The U.S. and the European Union provided no support to Massoud for the fight against the Taliban.
A change of policy, lobbied for by CIA officers on the ground who had visited the area of Massoud, regarding support to Massoud was underway in the course of 2001. According to Steve Coll's book "Ghost Wars"[88] (who won the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction):
"The CIA officers admired Massoud greatly. They saw him as a Che Guevara figure, a great actor on history's stage. Massoud was a poet, a military genius, a religious man, and a leader of enormous courage who defied death and accepted its inevitability, they thought.... In his house there were thousands of books: Persian poetry, histories of the Afghan war in multiple languages, biographies of other military and guerilla leaders. In their meetings Massoud wove sophisticated, measured references to Afghan history and global politics into his arguments. He was quiet, forceful, reserved, and full of dignity, but also light in spirit. The CIA team had gone into the Panshjir as unabashed admirers of Massoud. Now their convictions deepened...."[88]
— Steve Coll, in "Ghost Wars"
U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher also recalled: "[B]etween Bush's inauguration and 9/11, I met with the new national security staff on 3 occasions, including one meeting with Condoleezza Rice to discuss Afghanistan. There were, in fact, signs noted in an overview story in The Washington Post about a month ago that some steps were being made to break away from the previous administration's Afghan policy."[97] CIA lawyers, working with officers in the Near East Division and Counterterrorist Center, began to draft a formal, legal presidential finding for Bush's signature authorizing a new covert action program in Afghanistan, the first in a decade that sought to influence the course of the Afghan war in favour of Massoud.[88] This change in policy was finalized in August 2001 when it was too late.
After Pakistan had funded, directed and supported the Taliban's rise to power in Afghanistan, Massoud and the United Front received some assistance from India.[99] India was particularly concerned about Pakistan's Taliban strategy and the Islamic militancy in its neighborhood; it provided US$70 million in aid including two Mi-17 helicopters, three additional helicopters in 2000 and US$8 million worth of high-altitude equipment in 2001.[100] Furthermore, the alliance supposedly also received minor aid from Tajikistan, Russia and Iran because of their opposition to the Taliban and the Pakistani control over the Taliban's Emirate. Their support, however, remained limited to the most needed things. Meanwhile Pakistan engaged up to 28 000 Pakistani nationals and regular Pakistani army troops to fight alongside the Taliban and Al Qaeda forces against Massoud.[83][101]
In April 2001, the president of the European Parliament Nicole Fontaine (who called Massoud the "pole of liberty in Afghanistan") invited Massoud with the support of French and Belgian politicians to address the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium. In his speech, he asked for humanitarian aid for the people of Afghanistan. Massoud further went on to warn that his intelligence agents had gained limited knowledge about a large-scale terrorist attack on U.S. soil being imminent.[102]
Assassination
Massoud, then aged 48, was the target of a suicide attack at Khwaja Bahauddin, in Takhar Province in northeastern Afghanistan on September 9, 2001.[103][104] The attackers' names were alternately given as Dahmane Abd al-Sattar, husband of Malika El Aroud, and Bouraoui el-Ouaer; or 34-year-old Karim Touzani and 26-year-old Kacem Bakkali.[105]
The attackers claimed to be Belgians originally from Morocco. However, their passports turned out to be stolen and their nationality was later determined to be Tunisian. Waiting for almost three weeks (during which they also interviewed Burhanuddin Rabbani and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf) for an interview opportunity, on September 8, 2001, an aide to Massoud recalls the would-be suicide attackers "were so worried" and threatened to leave if the interview did not happen in the next 24 hours (until September 10, 2001). They were finally granted an interview. During the interview they set off a bomb that was composed of explosives hidden in the camera and in a battery pack belt. Commander Massoud died in a helicopter that was taking him to a military field hospital in nearby Tajikistan.[106][107] The explosion also killed Mohammed Asim Suhail, a United Front official, while Mohammad Fahim Dashty and Massoud Khalili were injured. One of the suicide attackers, Bouraoui, was also killed by the explosion while Dahmane was captured and shot while trying to escape.
Despite initial denials by the United Front, news of Massoud's death was reported almost immediately, appearing on the BBC, and in European and North American newspapers on September 10, 2001. On September 16, however, the United Front officially announced that Massoud had died of injuries in the suicide attack. Massoud was buried in his home village of Bazarak in the Panjshir Valley.[108] The funeral, although in a remote rural area, was attended by hundreds of thousands of people. (see video).
Afghan journalist Fahim Dashty summarized: "He was the only one, ever, to serve Afghanistan, to serve Afghans. To do a lot of things for Afghanistan, for Afghans. And we lost him." (see video)
Until he was assassinated, Massoud had survived assassination attempts for 26 years, including attempts made by Al Qaeda, the Taliban, the Pakistani ISI and before them the Soviet KGB, the Afghan communist KHAD and Hekmatyar. The first attempt on Massoud's life was carried out by Hekmatyar and two Pakistani ISI agents in 1975 when Massoud was only 22 years old.[8] In early 2001 Al Qaeda would-be assassins were captured by Massoud's forces while trying to enter his territory.[88]
Connection to September 11, 2001
The assassination of Massoud is considered to have a strong connection to the September 11 attacks in 2001 on U.S. soil which killed nearly 3,000 people and which appeared to be the terrorist attack that Massoud had warned against in his speech to the European Parliament several months earlier.
John P. O'Neill was a counter-terrorism expert and the Assistant Director of the FBI until late 2001. He retired from the FBI and was offered the position of director of security at the World Trade Center (WTC). He took the job at the WTC two weeks before 9/11. On September 10, 2001, John O'Neill told two of his friends, "We're due. And we're due for something big.... Some things have happened in Afghanistan. [referring to the assassination of Massoud] I don't like the way things are lining up in Afghanistan.... I sense a shift, and I think things are going to happen... soon."[109] John O'Neill died on September 11, 2001, when the south tower collapsed.[109]
U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher would later claim that he immediately saw the assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud as a sign that "something terrible [was] about to happen."[97] Rohrabacher recounted his convictions in a 2004 speech to congress: "As I mourned his loss, I struggled to fully understand the significance of his death. Then it dawned on me. It dawned on me why Massoud had been assassinated. America was going to be attacked. It would be so monstrous that bin Laden's gang in Afghanistan wanted to cut us off from a means of counterattacking them in their base of operations in Afghanistan. We would have turned to Massoud if we were attacked. That is what we would have done, and they were cutting us off from turning to Massoud, but now Massoud was dead. Perhaps his death was a signal to set the planned attack on our country in motion...."[97]
Analysts believe Osama bin Laden ordered the assassination to help his Taliban protectors and ensure he would have their protection and co-operation in Afghanistan. Following the assassination, Osama bin Laden had an emissary deliver a cassette of Dahmane speaking of his love for his wife and his decision to blow himself up as well as $500 in an envelope to settle a debt, to the assassin's widow.[110] The Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, an Afghan Wahhabi Islamist, have also been mentioned as possible organizers or collaborators of the Massoud assassins.[111] The assassins are said to have entered United Front (Northern Alliance) territory under the auspices of the Abdul Rasul Sayyaf and had his assistance in bypassing "normal security procedures."[111]
Investigative commission
In April 2003, the Karzai administration announced the setup of a commission to investigate the assassination of Massoud, as the country celebrated the 11th anniversary of the defeat of the communist government[112] The French secret service revealed on October 16, 2003 that the camera used by Massoud's assassins had been stolen in December 2000 in Grenoble, France from a photojournalist, Jean-Pierre Vincendet, who was then working on a story on that city's Christmas store window displays. By tracing the camera's serial number, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation was able to determine that Vincendet was its original owner. The French secret service and the FBI then began working on tracing the route the camera took between the time it was taken from Vincendet and the Massoud assassination.[113]
Legacy
National Hero of Afghanistan
Massoud's personal mysticism led him to fight without hatred, bitterness, or spirit of revenge, regarding armed conflict only as an imposed and necessary evil in order to defend his people's freedom, certainly not as an end in itself to be enjoyed as bloodlust or intoxication with power. He always provided protection for humanitarian relief in the most difficult and dangerous circumstances, looked for reconciliation with defeated enemies, and invariably treated his war prisoners with humanity and dignity. To this I was witness ... Such moral integrity in the midst of warfare ranks Massoud as one of the very few « philosopher kings » in history, that is, men who have been forced to wage war so as to protect their nation and people, but who detested war in itself and sought no personal political gain.[114]
Massoud was the only main Afghan leader who never left Afghanistan in the fight against the Soviet Union and later in the fight against the Taliban Emirate.[73] The National Geographic about that time concluded: "The only thing standing in the way of future Taliban massacres [was] Ahmad Shah Massoud." (see video) In the areas under his direct control such as Panjshir, some parts of Parwan and Takhar Massoud established democratic institutions. One refugee who cramped his family of 27 into an old jeep to flee from the Taliban to the area of Massoud described Massoud's territory in 1997 as "the last tolerant corner of Afghanistan".[115] About his life in Massoud's area he stated:"I feel freedom here. I like... you know, nobody bothers me. I do my job. I take care of my family. The way which I like I live in this area."[115]
In 2001, the Afghan Interim Government under president Hamid Karzai officially awarded Massoud the title of "Hero of the Afghan Nation".[73][116] One analyst in 2004 put it this way: "One man holds a greater political punch than all 18 living [Afghan] presidential candidates combined. Though already dead for three years.... Since his death on September 9, 2001 at the hands of two al Qaeda-linked Islamic radicals, Massoud has been transformed from mujahedin to national hero—if not saint. Pictures of Massoud, the Afghan mujahedin who battled the Soviets, other warlords, and the Taliban for more than 20 years, vastly outnumber those of any other Afghan including those of Karzai."[116] Dr. Abdullah Abdullah, one of the closest friends of Massoud, was Karzai's strongest rival in the Afghan Presidential Elections of 2009. Dr. Abdullah said about Massoud: "He was everything. He was a friend. He was a leader. He was a teacher without acting as a teacher."[73][117]
Journalist Sebastian Junger reports: "A lot of people who knew him felt that he was the best hope for that part of the world."[73] Junger who traveled to Afghanistan in 2000 to profile Massoud further states: "Afghanistan's government has been accused of being corrupt and weak. Massoud had a reputation for integrity and strength.... He would have been very hard for the [insurgents] to intimidate."[73] Shorish-Shamley, a women's rights activist, says: "If they [al Qaeda leaders] were hiding under a rock, he would have found them. He was that type of person. He would have found bin Laden."[73] Among supporters of the Taliban or Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's Hezb-i Islami he is obviously seen differently. Still, a 2009 CNN report concludes: "He remains today a hero on the streets of Kabul among a people who have more faith in a leader from the past than the leaders of the future." (see video)
Today Panjshir - the home of Massoud - "is arguably the most peaceful place in the entire country. A small US military reconstruction team is based here, but there are none of the signs of foreign occupation that exist elsewhere. Even Afghan soldiers are few and far between. Instead, the people like to boast about how they keep their own security," observes the United Arab Emirates newspaper The National.[118] The people of Panjshir (and Takhar) remain realistic however: "We are very sure that if they [the Taliban] come back they will not leave one man in Panjshir alive. If we don't fight they will kill us, so if we fight we will at least die with glory."[118] The National further states: "Those who knew him say he would never have accepted the Taliban's return to power and they have vowed to defend his memory."[118]
Many documentaries, books and movies have been made about Ahmad Shah Massoud. Massoud is the subject of Ken Follett's Lie Down With Lions, a novel about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. He also plays a significant role in James McGee's thriller Crow's War. Another is Fire by Sebastian Junger. Junger was one of the last Western journalists to interview Massoud in depth. The bulk of this interview was first published in March 2001 for National Geographic's Adventure Magazine, along with photographs by the renowned Iranian photographer Reza Deghati.
The Massoud Foundation was established in 2003, as an independent, non-aligned, non-profitable and non-political organization by people who have been affected by Massoud. It provides humanitarian assistance to Afghans especially in the fields of health care and education. It also runs programs in the fields of culture, construction, agriculture and welfare.
Lion of Panjshir
Massoud was named "The Afghan who won the cold war" by the Wall Street Journal.[1] He defeated the Soviet Red Army nine times in the Panjshir.[73] The Soviet Union's defeat was not only a defeat in Afghanistan, but led to the collapse of the Soviet system and was followed by the liberation of the Central Asian and Eastern European countries from Moscow's control. His struggle against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan earned him the name "Lion of Panjshir".
"Lion of Panjshir", is a rhyme and play on words in Persian, which alludes to the strength of his resistance against the Soviet Union, the mythological exaltation of the lion in Persian literature, and finally, the place name of the Panjshir Valley, where Massoud was born. The place name of "Panjshir" Valley in Persian means (Valley of the) Five Lions. Thus, the phrase "Lion of Panjshir", which in Persian is "Shir-e-Panjshir," شیر پنجشیر is a rhyming play on words, with the connotation "Lion of the Five Lions".
Warning the world (September 11, 2001)
In spring 2001, Ahmad Shah Massoud addressed the European Parliament in Brussels stating that behind the situation in Afghanistan there was the regime in Pakistan.[82] He also stated his conviction that without the support of Pakistan, Osama Bin Laden and Saudi Arabia, the Taliban would not be able to sustain their military campaign for up to a year, also because the Afghan population was ready to rise against them.[82] Addressing the United States specifically he issued the warning that should the U.S. not work for peace in Afghanistan and put pressure on Pakistan to cease their support to the Taliban, the problems of Afghanistan would soon become the problems of the U.S. and the world.[82][119]
Declassified Defense Intelligence Agency documents from November 2001 show that Massoud had gained "limited knowledge... regarding the intentions of [al-Qaeda] to perform a terrorist act against the US on a scale larger than the 1998 bombing of the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania."[96] They also point out that he warned about such attacks.[96]
In 2002, French singer-songwriter and author Damien Saez wrote a song about 9/11 entitled "Massoud". He was also featured in the ABC Television mini-series The Path to 9/11, which aired commercial-free in the USA in 2006, on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. The mini-series depicts Massoud warning U.S. intelligence agents of the coming U.S. attack by al-Qaeda[120] and Massoud's September 9, 2001 assassination.[121]
Personal
Massoud was married to Sediqa Massoud. They have one son (Ahmad born in 1989) and five daughters (Fatima born in 1992, Mariam born in 1993, Ayesha born in 1995, Zohra born in 1996 and Nasrine born in 1998). In 2005 Sediqa Massoud published a personal account on her life with Massoud (co-authored by two women's rights activists and friends of Sediqa Massoud, Chékéba Hachemi and Marie-Francoise Colombani) called "Pour l'amour de Massoud" (For the love of Massoud) in which she describes a very decent and loving husband.
A major road in Kabul was named Great Massoud Road, and just outside the US Embassy stands a monument to Massoud. The family has a great deal of prestige in the politics of Afghanistan. One of his six brothers, Ahmad Zia Massoud, was the Vice President of Afghanistan from 2004 until 2009 under the first ever democratically elected government of Afghanistan. There have been unsuccessful attempts on the life of Ahmad Zia Massoud in 2004 and late 2009. The Associated Press reported that 8 Afghans died in the attempt on Ahmad Zia Massoud's life.[122] Ahmad Zia Massoud now leads the National Front of Afghanistan (a United Front group).
Another brother, Ahmad Wali Massoud, was Afghanistan's Ambassador to the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2006.[123] He is now a member of Abdullah Abdullah's National Coalition of Afghanistan (another United Front group).
See also
- Amrullah Saleh
- Abdullah Abdullah
- Massoud Khalili
- Malika El Aroud
- Reagan Doctrine
- Sebastian Junger's "Fire"
Notes and references
- ^ a b c "Charlie Rose March 26, 2001". CBS. 2001.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Marcela Grad. Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader (March 1, 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 310. Cite error: The named reference "Webster University Press Book" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Rashid, Ahmed (2010). "Tajikistan: The Next Jihadi Stronghold?". The New York Review of Books.
In the 1980s, the top commander against the Soviets in Afghanistan, Ahmed Shah Massoud, was an Afghan Tajik who helped end the civil war in Tajikistan in 1997, and was assassinated by al-Qaeda just two days before 9/11.
- ^ Prof. Andre Canessa of The supporting committee for the Nobel Peace Prize to Ahmad Shah Massoud
- ^ Afghanistan Events, Lonely Planet Travel Guide.
- ^ a b c d e Vollmer, Susan (2007). Legends, Leaders, Legacies. Bootheel Publishing. ISBN 978-0979523311.
- ^ a b c Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York. pp. 38–42. Cite error: The named reference "Neamatollah Nojumi" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Roy Gutman. How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan (1st ed., 2008 ed.). Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, Washington DC. p. 34. Cite error: The named reference "Roy Gutman" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c Shahram Akbarzadeh, Samina Yasmeen. Islam And the West: Reflections from Australia (2005 ed.). University of New South Wales Press. pp. 81–82.
- ^ Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York. p. 39.
- ^ Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York. p. 41.
- ^ a b Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York. p. 42.
- ^ a b Oliver Roy. Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan (1990 ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 95.
- ^ Oliver Roy. Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan (1990 ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Isby, David (1989). War in a distant country, Afghanistan: invasion and resistance. Arms and Armour Press. p. 107. ISBN 0 85368 769 2.
- ^ Oliver Roy. Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan (1990 ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 132.
- ^ Sebastian Junger Under Fire by Ted Chamberlain, National Geographic
- ^ a b van Voorst, Bruce; Iyer, Pico; Aftab, Mohammad (May 7, 1984). "Afghanistan: The bear descends on the lion". Time. New York.
- ^ Roy, p.199.
- ^ Barry, Michael (2002). Massoud, de l'islamisme à la liberté, p. 216. Paris: Audibert. Template:Language icon ISBN 2-84749-002-7
- ^ Bowersox, Gary; Snee, Lawrence; Foord, Eugene; Seal, Robert (1991). "Emeralds of the Panjshir valley, Afghanistan". www.gems-afghan.com. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved August 17, 2007.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Le pouvoir des seigneurs de guerre et la situation sécuritaire en Afghanistan" (PDF) (in French). Commission des Recours des Réfugiés. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2007. Retrieved August 16, 2007.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|publisher=
|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Davies, L. Will; Shariat, Abdullah (2004). Fighting Masoud's war, Melbourne: Lothian, p. 200. ISBN 0-7344-0590-1
- ^ Barry, p.194.
- ^ Roy, p.201.
- ^ Roy, p.213.
- ^ Isby, p.98.
- ^ Roy, p.202.
- ^ Phillips, James A. (May 18, 1992). "Winning the Endgame in Afghanistan", Heritage Foundation Backgrounder #181.
- ^ Johns, Michael (January 19, 2008). "Charlie Wilson's War Was Really America's War".
- ^ a b c The Fall of Kabul, April 1992, Library of Congress country studies. Retrieved April 2, 2007.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "The Fall of Kabul, April 1992". Library of Congress. Cite error: The named reference "Library of Congress Country Studies" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b "The United Nations Plan for Political Accommodation". Library of Congress. Cite error: The named reference "Library of Congress Country Studies (2)" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d Roy Gutman. How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan (1st ed., 2008 ed.). Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, Washington DC. Cite error: The named reference "Roy Gutman (2)" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Amin Saikal. Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival (2006 1st ed.). I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., London New York. p. 214. ISBN 1-85043-437-9.
- ^ a b c d Amin Saikal. Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival (2006 1st ed.). I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., London New York. p. 215. ISBN 1-85043-437-9. Cite error: The named reference "Amin Saikal (3)" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Neamatollah Nojumi. The Rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan: Mass Mobilization, Civil War, and the Future of the Region (2002 1st ed.). Palgrave, New York. p. 112.
- ^ a b c d "Blood-Stained Hands, Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan's Legacy of Impunity". Human Rights Watch.
- ^ a b c d e f "Casting Shadows: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: 1978-2001" (PDF). Afghanistan Justice Project. 2005.
- ^ a b c "II. BACKGROUND". Human Rights Watch.
- ^ a b c d e f Newsday (2001). "Taliban massacres outlined for UN". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2011-01-21.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) Cite error: The named reference "Newsday 2001" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ a b c d e Newsday (2001). "Confidential UN report details mass killings of civilian villagers". newsday.org. Retrieved 2001-10-12.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ a b c Gutman, Roy (2008): How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan, Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace, 1st ed., Washington D.C., p. 222
- ^ Afghanistan Online: Biography Ahmad Shah Massoud
- ^ a b Amin Saikal. Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival (2006 1st ed.). I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., London New York. p. 216. ISBN 1-85043-437-9.
- ^ a b c Amnesty International. "DOCUMENT - AFGHANISTAN: FURTHER INFORMATION ON FEAR FOR SAFETY AND NEW CONCERN: DELIBERATE AND ARBITRARY KILLINGS: CIVILIANS IN KABUL." 16 November 1995 Accessed at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA11/015/1995/en/6d874caa-eb2a-11dd-92ac-295bdf97101f/asa110151995en.html
- ^ "Afghanistan: escalation of indiscriminate shelling in Kabul". International Committee of the Red Cross. 1995.
- ^ Matinuddin, Kamal, The Taliban Phenomenon, Afghanistan 1994–1997, Oxford University Press, (1999), pp.25–6
- ^ BBC Newsnight 1995 on YouTube
- ^ "The September 11th Sourcebooks Volume VII: The Taliban File". gwu.edu. 2003.
- ^ a b Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. p. 36. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ a b "PAKISTAN'S SUPPORT OF THE TALIBAN". Human Rights Watch. 2000.
- ^ a b Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. p. 39. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ "Documents Detail Years of Pakistani Support for Taliban, Extremists". George Washington University. 2007.
- ^ a b Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. p. 43. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ a b Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. p. 41. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ a b c d Ahmed Rashid. Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale Nota Bene Books. p. 48. ISBN 978-0300089028.
- ^ Coll, Ghost Wars (New York: Penguin, 2005), 14.
- ^ "As the Taliban Finish Off Foes, Iran Is Looming"
- ^ "Afghan 'Lion' Fights Taliban With Rifle and Fax Machine"
- ^ "Afghan Driven From Kabul Makes Stand in North"
- ^ a b c d e "The Taliban's War on Women. A Health and Human Rights Crisis in Afghanistan" (PDF). Physicians for Human Rights. 1998.
- ^ Rashid, Ahmed (2002). Taliban: Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia. I.B.Tauris. p. 253. ISBN 978-1-86064-830-4.
- ^ U.N. says Taliban starving hungry people for military agenda, Associated Press
- ^ Goodson, Larry P. (2002). Afghanistan's Endless War: State Failure, Regional Politics and the Rise of the Taliban. University of Washington Press. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-295-98111-6.
- ^ a b "Re-Creating Afghanistan: Returning to Istalif". NPR. 2002-08-01.
- ^ Clements, Frank (2003). Conflict in Afghanistan: a historical encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 112. ISBN 978-1-85109-402-8.
- ^ Coburn, Noah (2011). Bazaar Politics: Power and Pottery in an Afghan Market Town. Stanford University Press. p. 13. ISBN [[Special:BookSources/978080477672 |978080477672 [[Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs]]]].
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: invalid character (help) - ^ a b "Lifting The Veil On Taliban Sex Slavery". Time Magazine. 2002-02-10.
- ^ a b The Indian Diaspora (Chapter 2) – Afghanistan, Central Asia and Iran
- ^ a b "BOOK REVIEW: The inside track on Afghan wars by Khaled Ahmed". Daily Times. 2008.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Brigade 055". CNN. unknown.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) Cite error: The named reference "CNN" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ a b "Afghanistan resistance leader feared dead in blast". London: Ahmed Rashid in the Telegraph. September 11, 2001.
- ^ Maley, William (2009). The Afghanistan wars. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 288. ISBN 978-0-230-21313-5.
{{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Tomsen, Peter (2011). Wars of Afghanistan. PublicAffairs. p. 322. ISBN 978-1-58648-763-8.
- ^ Edward Girardet. Killing the Cranes: A Reporter's Journey Through Three Decades of War in Afghanistan (August 3, 2011 ed.). Chelsea Green Publishing. p. 416.
- ^ "Afghanistan: Arena for a New Rivalry". Washington Post. 1998.
- ^ "Pak involved in Taliban offensive - Russia". Express India. 1998.
- ^ "Afghanistan & the United Nations". United Nations. 2012.
- ^ "U.S. presses for bin Laden's ejection". Washington Times. 2001.
- ^ a b c d e "Massoud in the European Parliament 2001". EU media. 2001. Cite error: The named reference "EU Parliament" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c "Inside the Taliban". National Geographic. 2007.
- ^ "Inside the Taliban". National Geographic. 2007.
- ^ a b "The Last Interview with Ahmad Shah Massoud". Piotr Balcerowicz. 2001.
- ^ a b "The man who would have led Afghanistan". St. Petersburg Times. 2002.
- ^ "Proposal for Peace, promoted by Commander Massoud". peace-initiatives.com. 1998.
- ^ a b c d e f g Steve Coll. Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 (February 23, 2004 ed.). Penguin Press HC. p. 720.
- ^ Tomsen, Peter (2011). Wars of Afghanistan. PublicAffairs. p. 565. ISBN 978-1586487638.
- ^ "The Afghan Solution". Lucy Morgan Edwards.
The central theme of the book is Edward's investigation into a major Afghan-led plan for toppling the Taliban: a plan which existed for two years prior to 9/11, and which had buy-in from senior tribal leaders, commanders within the military axis of the Taliban, possibly the Haqqani network, Commander Massoud and senior Taliban who were willing to bring about a new order. The ex King was to provide the 'glue' around which these different groups would coalesce.
- ^ Tomsen, Peter (2011). Wars of Afghanistan. PublicAffairs. p. 566. ISBN 978-1586487638.
- ^ "Council of Afghan opposition". Corbis. 2001.
- ^ Marcela Grad. Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader (1 March 2009 ed.). Webster University Press. p. 65.
- ^ "The lost lion of Kabul". The New Statesman. 2011.
- ^ "Massoud in the European Parliament 2001". EU media. 2001.
- ^ a b c Boettcher, Mike (November 6, 2003). "How much did Afghan leader know?". CNN.com. Retrieved June 11, 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "9/11 Represented a Dramatic Failure of Policy and People". U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher. 2004.
- ^ Risen, James. "State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration", 2006
- ^ Peter Pigott: Canada in Afghanistan
- ^ Duncan Mcleod: India and Pakistan
- ^ "History Commons". History Commons. 2010.
- ^ "April 6, 2001: Rebel Leader Warns Europe and US About Large-Scale Imminent Al-Qaeda Attacks". History Commons. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ "Taliban Foe Hurt and Aide Killed by Bomb"
- ^ "THREATS AND RESPONSES: ASSASSINATION; Afghans, Too, Mark a Day of Disaster: A Hero Was Lost"
- ^ Pinto, Maria do Ceu. "Islamist and Middle Eastern Terrorism: A Threat to Europe?". p. 72.
- ^ http://www.timofranc.com/LION%20OF%20PANJSHIR.PDF
- ^ http://www.india-defence.com/reports-3550
- ^ "Rebel Chief Who Fought The Taliban Is Buried"
- ^ a b "The Man Who Knew". PBS. 2002.
- ^ "Suicide Bomber's Widow Soldiers On" http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/elaroud/index.html
- ^ a b Anderson, Jon Lee (June 10, 2002). "The assassins", The New Yorker, Vol.78, Iss. 15; p. 72.
- ^ "AFTEREFFECTS: Briefly Noted; AFGHAN PANEL TO INVESTIGATE MASSOUD'S DEATH"
- ^ "TV camera rigged to kill Afghan rebel Masood stolen in France: police", Agence France-Presse, October 16, 2003.
- ^ Thoughts on Commander Massoud by Princeton University Prof. Michael Barry
- ^ a b "Massoud's Last Stand". Journeyman Pictures/ABC Australia. 1997. Cite error: The named reference "Journeyman Picture/ABC Australia" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b "Playing the Massoud card". Eurasianet.org. 2004. Cite error: The named reference "Eurasianet.org" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "He would have found Bin Laden". CNN. 2009.
- ^ a b c "Reconciliation plans worry Afghans in the north". The National. 2010.
- ^ Defense Intelligence Agency (2001) report http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB97/tal32.pdf
- ^ Ahmad Shah Massoud's warning to the United States, The Path to 9/11 (video clip).
- ^ Assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud, The Path to 9/11.
- ^ Associated Press Report on YouTube
- ^ Solutions to Security Challenges: Interview with Ahmad Wali Massoud, Kabul Center for Strategic Studies, 1 November 2007
Further reading
- Marcela Grad (2009): Massoud: An Intimate Portrait of the Legendary Afghan Leader; Webster University Press, 310pp
- Sediqa Massoud with Chékéba Hachemi and Marie-Francoise Colombani (2005): Pour l'amour de Massoud; Document XO Editions, 265pp (in French)
- Amin Saikal (2006): Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival; I. B. Tauris, 352pp ("One of the "Five Best" Books on Afghanistan" - Wall Street Journal)
- Roy Gutman (2008): How We Missed the Story: Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Hijacking of Afghanistan; United States Institute of Peace Press, 304pp
- Coll, Steve (2004): Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 9, 2001; Penguin Press, 695pp, ISBN 1-59420-007-6. (won the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction)
- Stephen Tanner: Afghanistan: A Military History from Alexander the Great to the Fall of the Taliban
- Christophe de Ponfilly (2001): Massoud l'Afghan; Gallimard, 437pp (in French)
- Gary W. Bowersox (2004): The Gem Hunter-True Adventures of an American in Afghanistan; Geovision, Inc. (January 22, 2004), ISBN 978-0974732312.
- Gary C. Schroen (2005): 'First In' An Insiders Account of How The CIA Spearheaded the War on Terror in Afghanistan; New York: Presido Press/Ballantine Books, ISBN 978-0-89141-872-6.
- Peter Bergen: Holy War, Inc.
- Ahmed Rashid: TALIBAN - The Story of the Afghan Warlords; ISBN 0-330-49221-7.
- A. R. Rowan: On The Trail Of A Lion: Ahmed Shah Massoud, Oil Politics and Terror
- MaryAnn T. Beverly (2007): From That Flame; Kallisti Publishing
- Roger Plunk: The Wandering Peacemaker
- References to Massoud appear in the book "A Thousand Splendid Suns" by Khaled Hosseini.
- Kara Kush, London: William Collins Sons and Co., Ltd., 1986. ISBN 0685557871 The novel Kara Kush by Idries Shah is rumored to be loosely based on the exploits of Massoud during the Afghan-Soviet War.
External links
- Massoud's Letter To The People Of America 1998
- Proposal for Peace, promoted by Commander Massoud, in English in Dari (Persian), April 19, 1998
- Template:Worldcat id
- Template:Dmoz
- Interviews
- The Last Interview with Ahmad Shah Massoud Piotr Balcerowicz, early August 2001
- "Breakfast with Massoud" by Roger Plunk The Source, December 1, 2001
- Obituaries and articles
- Ahmad Shah Massoud collected news and commentary at The New York Times
- Ahmad Shah Mas’ud (1953-2001), Bharat Rakshak Monitor, November–December 2001
- Remembering Massoud, a fighter for peace, The New York Times, September 10, 2002
- The Assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud Paul Wolf, Global Research, 14 September 2003
- 60 Years of Asian Heroes: Ahmad Shah Massoud Time, 2006
- Profile: Afghanistan's 'Lion Of Panjshir' Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, September 5, 2006
- Afghan Commander Massoud, Killed on Eve of 9/11 Attacks, is a National Hero by The LA Times, 22 September 2010
- Afghanistan - the Squandered Victory (documentary film) by the BBC
(documentary film directly from the year 1989 explaining the beginning of the turmoil to follow)
- Commander Massoud's Struggle (documentary film) by Nagakura Hiromi
(from 1992: one month after the fall of the communist regime, after Hekmatyar had been expelled to the southern outskirts of Kabul, before he restarted his heavy bombardment of Kabul with Pakistani support)
- Hekmatyar attacks Kabul but is repelled on YouTube
- Massoud is popular among the people who also trust him to rebuild their country on YouTube
- Massoud tries to prevent war between Ittehad and Wahdat on YouTube
- Massoud talks about his convictions on YouTube
- Massoud's Conversation with Hekmatyar (original document of 1992)
- Ahmad Shah Massoud - Destiny's Afghan (documentary film) by Iqbal Malhotra
- Massoud l'Afghan (documentary film) by Christophe de Ponfilly
- Massoud l'Afghan part 1 on YouTube
- New York Times Film Review
- rottentomatoes.com Film Review
- Theatrical Release
- Who Killed Massoud? (documentary film) by Didier Martiny
- Afghanistan Revealed (2000) portrait of Massoud by National Geographic photographer Reza Deghati, cinematographer Stephen Cocklin, and writer Sebastian Junger
- Afghanistan Revealed | Watch the Documentary Film Free Online | SnagFilms
- A Film Screening and Panel Discussion Focusing on the Middle East and Afghanistan
- Afghanistan Revealed | National Geographic Education Video
- AFGHANISTAN REVEALED Review | EW.com
- Junger, Sebastian. "A Lion in Winter". Adventure Magazine. National Geographic. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
- The Lion Of Panjshir (Symphony No. 2) for narrator and symphonic band by composer David Gaines
- Photographs
- 1953 births
- 2001 deaths
- Afghan Tajik people
- Afghan Muslims
- Afghan anti-communists
- Assassinated Afghan politicians
- Assassinated military personnel
- Cold War leaders
- Deaths by explosive device
- Government ministers of Afghanistan
- Guerrilla warfare theorists
- People of the Soviet war in Afghanistan
- People murdered in Afghanistan
- Guerrillas killed in action
- Military personnel killed in action
- Afghan warlords