Talk:Behavioral sink: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
{{WikiProject Community|class=start}} |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Untitled== |
==Untitled== |
||
This article is awful, for which I apologise -- but I hope that it is better than what was there before. I think the major problem with this article is that the topic of the article necessarily cuts across biology, sociology, psychology, and cultural studies, all at once -- an experimental fact, interpreted in an anthropomorphic way, used as a metaphor for human society, taken up by academia and popular culture, from ''Scientific American'' and Mumford to ''Batman'' and ''2000 AD''. Can anyone who knows something about any of these subjects improve this article, please? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 00:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC) |
This article is awful, for which I apologise -- but I hope that it is better than what was there before. I think the major problem with this article is that the topic of the article necessarily cuts across biology, sociology, psychology, and cultural studies, all at once -- an experimental fact, interpreted in an anthropomorphic way, used as a metaphor for human society, taken up by academia and popular culture, from ''Scientific American'' and Mumford to ''Batman'' and ''2000 AD''. Can anyone who knows something about any of these subjects improve this article, please? -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 00:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
: Seems okay. I might suggest finding another title for the heading "Rat to human comparison". Maybe "Reactions" or "Criticisms"? [[User:Kortoso|Kortoso]] ([[User talk:Kortoso|talk]]) 21:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:01, 31 August 2015
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
This article is awful, for which I apologise -- but I hope that it is better than what was there before. I think the major problem with this article is that the topic of the article necessarily cuts across biology, sociology, psychology, and cultural studies, all at once -- an experimental fact, interpreted in an anthropomorphic way, used as a metaphor for human society, taken up by academia and popular culture, from Scientific American and Mumford to Batman and 2000 AD. Can anyone who knows something about any of these subjects improve this article, please? -- The Anome (talk) 00:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Seems okay. I might suggest finding another title for the heading "Rat to human comparison". Maybe "Reactions" or "Criticisms"? Kortoso (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)