User:Ian.thomson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:30, 3 November 2020

Black Lives Matter

Wikipedia does not care about you or me being qualified scholars. Wikipedia is not a scholarly site, but a summary of sources that speak for themselves. We all have the right to edit, but there are rules to make sure that proper sources are used for appropriate articles and editors are civil.

Stuff I've done elsewhere

I was born Methodist, raised a liberal Baptist, and now refer to myself as a Zen Baptist. Ever since I was young I've had an interest in religion and mythology. In high school I became interested in philosophy, and began reading about "occult" topics as an extension of mythology studies. I took a little time off between high school and college and spent most of it in the library going through most of the books on religion, mythology, philosophy, and occultism. I majored in English (in theory focused on composition, in practice focused on literature), minored in Secondary Education, and took way too many elective courses.

I taught IELTS speaking at China Jiliang University, in Hangzhou, Zhejiang.

Stuff I've done here

Wrote yet another guide that no one is going to read except to misinterpret as policy.
Documented how too many people usually blunder through article creation.
Created, recreated, or rewrote: Debtera, Liber Officiorum Spirituum, Livre des Esperitz, Magical Treatise of Solomon.
Rewrote: Arbatel de magia veterum, Book of Saint Cyprian, Idealism (Christian eschatology), Lesser Key of Solomon, Reuben Swinburne Clymer, Shemhamphorasch, Cassiel.
To do: Sariel, Zaphkiel, Zadkiel, Camael, Haniel, Sachiel, Jophiel (did once, but more sources now), Seven Archangels, The Solomonic Miscellany, an overhaul of List of Demons in the Ars Goetia, planned rewrites of Enochian magic and List of Enochian angels
Added big honkin' chart with names and stuff to the Decans article, plan on adding descriptions of images at some point.
Went through the articles that link to "LGBT issues and Voodoo" and changed it to "LGBT topics and Voodoo."
Worked with Dougweller in removing all mentions, uses, or links to or of http://historyhuntersinternational.org/, a blog with no evidence of credentials (if they are professors, why would they not want their name associated with that work in a more publically recognized journal?), that contains some crackpot ideas (Alexander the Great's existence should be doubted like Jesus?).
I replaced/removed all uses of The Dying God.com since it's a self-published source (and in a few cases, counter to most other sources).
Monkey's pawed someone's hopeful inquiry into us making "a presence" for their fake news site.
Reminder for future conversations: Here is where I pointed out that Buddhist, Hindu, Shinto, Sikh, Taoist, Deist, and even (Schopenhauerian) atheistic 6000-year-old young earth creationism would exist if there was any valid evidence that the world was that young.

Userboxes

This user is a WikiBadger.

This user is a WikiOgre.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Occult.

This user believes that caffeine is necessary in large doses daily.

This user is a humanist.

This user is a Liberal Christian.

Alba
This user is of Scottish ancestry.

Y'all

This here user talks Southern, y'all.

USC

This user attends or attended the University of South Carolina.

This user thinks nationalism is outdated.

WUSA
SMAR
AIPGF

This user is a White, USAmerican, straight, male, anti-racist, anti-imperialist, pro-gay feminist - and proud of it!

This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years (since 2006).

When in doubt

Do what Jack Churchill would do. If that doesn't or will not work, do what Hunter S. Thompson would do.
Go on and assume I am the second coming of Jack Chick without viewing the evidence to the contrary on this page.
Keep in mind: "I'll die before I surrender, Tim."
The difference between realism and conspiracy theorism:

Realism: 1 + 1 = 2

Conspiracy theorism: 1^[1] +^[2] 1^[3] =^[4] 2^[5] 0^[6] ergo, math is a conspiracy by Catholic Freemasons to destroy marriage through government enforced homosexuality!^[7]

^ (which must be a reference to the one world government)
^ (aha, proof this is a papist lie, so we need to subtract what follows!)
^ (this repetition of numbers is part of Kabbalistic numerology, proof that the Masons are involved)
^ (equal sign is proof that the gay mafia is involved)
^ (two represents marriage, but we have it being equated through homosexuality to two separate individuals being tied together by the Pope!)
^ (of course, since we have to subtract it, it comes out to 1 minus 1, or 0, is equal 2, which shows their opposition to marriage)
^ (they've even hidden the number 7 in here as numerological proof)

"All politicians lie" misses the point that not all untruths are equal. 2+2=4, when properly understood, is universally true. "Two missed anniversaries + two unscheduled fishing trips = one angry wife" is properly understood as a social statement rather than a mathematical one. 2+2=? and ?+2≠4 are potentially true but woefully incomplete (and if a response to later statements, intended to point to untruths). 2 + 2 = 5 is technically true in some engineering contexts (large quantities of 2 and small quantities of 5). 2+2=10 is true in Base 4 but that only matters in a couple of dead languages and some computer science contexts. 2+2=7 is just plain wrong. "2 and 2 cannot be added because they're the same thing" is a convoluted denial of reality. "Addition is a lie" is the sort of insanity that should immediately disqualify anyone from being taken seriously for anything. Mainstream politicians stick to the wife joke, 2+2=?, ?+2≠4, 2+2=5, and 2+2=10 -- statements that are potentially true within specific contexts but false in others. Mainstream but near-fascist politicians like to follow 2+2=? with "some people say 2+2=7 but I'm bad at math" to rally math-deniers while appeasing moderates. QAnon and similar movements make "Addition is a lie" statements to push the Overton window such that politicians arguing "2+2=7" with a straight face don't need to qualify their statements because at least they're still admitting that numbers are a concept. This is why we don't treat "both sides" as equally untruthful. This is why we have only articles on certain politicians lying but not others. This is why we have only articles on conspiracy theories popular among certain ends of the political spectrum but not others.

Paradoxically honorable part of my bookshelf by the son of Peter
Committed identity: 55a76a50ba8a238069e68836120151b2078697a6ac5754364eff2b46d46810c7a9d82a31a7eca39039c9eefefb716acd3f14e36375d3af6b72afb800215f19a1 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

[1] (which must be a reference to the one world government)

[2] (aha, proof this is a papist lie, so we need to subtract what follows!)

[3] (this repetition of numbers is part of Kabbalistic numerology, proof that the Masons are involved)

[4] (equal sign is proof that the gay mafia is involved)

[5] (two represents marriage, but we have it being equated through homosexuality to two separate individuals being tied together by the Pope!)

[6] (of course, since we have to subtract it, it comes out to 1 minus 1, or 0, is equal 2, which shows their opposition to marriage)

[7] (they've even hidden the number 7 in here as numerological proof)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ::Conspiracy theorism: 1<ref>(which must be a reference to the one world government)</ref> +<ref>(aha, proof this is a papist lie, so we need to ''subtract'' what follows!)</ref> 1<ref>(this repetition of numbers is part of Kabbalistic numerology, proof that the Masons are involved)</ref> =<ref>(equal sign is proof that the gay mafia is involved)</ref> <s>2</s><ref>(two represents marriage, but we have it being equated through homosexuality to two separate individuals being tied together by the Pope!)</ref> ''0''<ref>(of course, since we have to subtract it, it comes out to 1 minus 1, or 0, is equal 2, which shows their opposition to marriage)</ref> ergo, math is a conspiracy by Catholic Freemasons to destroy marriage through government enforced homosexuality!<ref>(they've even hidden the number 7 in here as numerological proof)</ref>
 {{reflist}}
+*"All politicians lie" misses the point that not all untruths are equal.  2+2=4, when properly understood, is universally true.  "Two missed anniversaries + two unscheduled fishing trips = one angry wife" is properly understood as a social statement rather than a mathematical one.  2+2=? and ?+2≠4 are potentially true but woefully incomplete (and if a response to later statements, intended to point to untruths).  [[2 + 2 = 5]] is technically true in some engineering contexts (large quantities of 2 and small quantities of 5).  2+2=10 is true in [[Base 4]] but that only matters in a couple of dead languages and some computer science contexts.  2+2=7 is just plain wrong.  "2 and 2 cannot be added because they're the same thing" is a convoluted denial of reality.  "Addition is a lie" is the sort of insanity that should immediately disqualify anyone from being taken seriously for anything.  Mainstream politicians stick to the wife joke, 2+2=?, ?+2≠4, 2+2=5, and 2+2=10 -- statements that are potentially true within specific contexts but false in others.  Mainstream but near-fascist politicians like to follow 2+2=? with "some people say 2+2=7 but I'm bad at math" to rally math-deniers while appeasing moderates.  QAnon and similar movements make "Addition is a lie" statements to push the [[Overton window]] such that politicians arguing "2+2=7" with a straight face don't need to qualify their statements because at least they're still admitting that numbers are a concept.  ''This is why [[WP:GEVAL|we don't treat "both sides" as equally untruthful]].''  This is why we have only articles on certain politicians lying but not others.  This is why we have only articles on conspiracy theories popular among certain ends of the political spectrum but not others.
 {{cob}}