Talk:Famicom Detective Club: Difference between revisions
→Composer of Vol. 1: new section |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:Oof, I don't like the montage of the four covers. Too busy, too shrunk down. I would just use the first of the historical covers. (Or the modern image. I liked how the modern one was in English and how it elegantly covered both games. But I understand Wikipedia has a general preference for using the original artwork for media.) [[User:WanderingWanda|WanderingWanda]] ([[User talk:WanderingWanda|talk]]) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC) |
:Oof, I don't like the montage of the four covers. Too busy, too shrunk down. I would just use the first of the historical covers. (Or the modern image. I liked how the modern one was in English and how it elegantly covered both games. But I understand Wikipedia has a general preference for using the original artwork for media.) [[User:WanderingWanda|WanderingWanda]] ([[User talk:WanderingWanda|talk]]) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::IDK, I've come around to feeling that the current four cover montage is the best we can do at this time. I understand it's busy, but no Disk System cover is more iconic or recognizable than the other, and ''Part II'' is arguably the more well known entry. The Switch cover, while nice for a number of reasons, is inferior to the Disk System art collage in that the latter reflects the art design of the original, its episodic nature, and their age. The look of the remake is quite different. Since most of the article is talking about the originals, it is not representative of the topic to use the remake artwork. [[User:TarkusAB|<span style="color: #000000">'''TarkusAB'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:TarkusAB|<span style="color: #aa0000">'''talk'''</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/TarkusAB|<span style="color: #aa0000">'''contrib'''</span>]]</sup> 03:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC) |
::IDK, I've come around to feeling that the current four cover montage is the best we can do at this time. I understand it's busy, but no Disk System cover is more iconic or recognizable than the other, and ''Part II'' is arguably the more well known entry. The Switch cover, while nice for a number of reasons, is inferior to the Disk System art collage in that the latter reflects the art design of the original, its episodic nature, and their age. The look of the remake is quite different. Since most of the article is talking about the originals, it is not representative of the topic to use the remake artwork. [[User:TarkusAB|<span style="color: #000000">'''TarkusAB'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:TarkusAB|<span style="color: #aa0000">'''talk'''</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/TarkusAB|<span style="color: #aa0000">'''contrib'''</span>]]</sup> 03:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Composer of Vol. 1 == |
|||
The composer is given as either a pseudonym or a mononym, and the actual, full name is not known. I asked on Manual of Style/Film for what to do in such a situation, and was told that the name, pseudonym/mononym or not, should be credited. [[User:Linkdude20002001|Linkdude20002001]] ([[User talk:Linkdude20002001|talk]]) 11:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:51, 4 March 2021
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Famicom Tantei Club: Kieta Kōkeisha was copied or moved into Famicom Detective Club with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Famicom Detective Club: The Girl Who Stands Behind was copied or moved into Famicom Detective Club with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Tose
DrSanic Regarding Tose, they are a well known shadow developer, meaning they do work on contract and don't carry much in creative direction of the projects they work on. They might get mentioned in the credits, but are not normally considered "co-developers" and should be omitted from the infobox. If you can find a source stating that they worked on one or both of the original games, it could be mentioned in prose, but not the infobox. According to the Virtual Console page, they share copyright with Nintendo over the Wii Virtual Console release of the first game [1], but not the second game [2] or its remake [3]. I don't know if that means they worked on the original or only the VC version. We need better sources. TarkusABtalk/contrib 15:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Image
Do we really want to use the remake artwork for the infobox? I know that normally VG articles tend to use English cover art, but this is a classic from 33 years ago - it feels odd to then be using 2021 art, especially as the infobox artwork is meant to serve as visual recognition of the article subject. We can still "represent" the remake visually by adding its logo, as it "consists only of simple geometric shapes or text".--AlexandraIDV 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- So I understand what you are saying. I picked that artwork because I felt it was the best compromise, but I agree with your thoughts and I'm not totally convinced it's the best choice. My reasoning with picking that artwork was:
- The original artwork is virtually unknown and unrecognized outside Japan.
- The original games actually have four covers. Two games, released on two discs each, so four total separate cover arts.
- MOS:LEADIMAGE suggests that while image should be "representative", they should also "give readers visual confirmation that they've arrived at the right page" and "what our readers will expect to see".
- Once the games are released on the Switch, those versions will be primarily what is known among our readers, not the FDS logo/art.
- The logo actually differs between the Switch games, and this was the only official combined logo I could find.
- Finding a PD version of the Switch logo (without the design) may be difficult. A PD version of the FDS logo (all japanese text) isn't really helpful to our readers.
- Maybe putting both Switch logos (as seen here), the second below the other, instead of trying to find a combined version would be better. Open to suggestions. TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I think the main problem is that the two games are on a single page. This isn't like The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Season and The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages which were made at the same time, and must both be played to reach the ending. Or Pokemon Red Version and Pokemon Blue Version which are the same game with slight alterations to make them different enough to require trading with a friend. This is one game that was made and sold in 1988, and another that was made and sold in 1989. But that aside, I think the combined English logo is prefered. That's what would be on the cover art of the box...if the physical release wasn't Japan-only. Maybe it would be better to zoom in on the logo so the conflicting artwork won't be seen. Then you're left with only a logo (and some moon, buildings, and sky). I made one (counted the pixles to make sure it was perfectly centered), and it looks alright. It would do till Nintendo or America or Europe puts out the clean logo somewhere. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 04:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- We can't use custom crops like that unfortunately, but hopefully we can get an official crop like that soon. That or we show both covers or logos like Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon. TarkusABtalk/contrib 13:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
If we can show multiple covers, I'd suggest showing all four of the original FCD covers then. Tho, I suppose it would make the most sense for it to be a logo, like all the other main Nintendo pages. I guess I vote to leave it as is...for now. There will be a clean version of the logo eventually. I'll even ask NoA and NoE for it. Maybe they'll post it. Advertizing these games is cruicial to their success. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, for the mean time, maybe this (https://cdn02.nintendo-europe.com/media/images/11_square_images/games_18/nintendo_switch_download_software/SQ_NSwitchDS_FamicomDetectiveClub_Combo.jpg) would be a better depiction of the logo. I think it the logo would be slightly larger for the reader to see. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
@Alexandra IDV: @Linkdude20002001: I have changed out the image to show all four FCD covers. Curious what your thoughts are. Linkdude, sorry I changed out the image before seeing your suggestion, but I think yours is better than the first one, at least. TarkusABtalk/contrib 19:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Happy with the image, although it would be good if you could fill in the sites you got them from in the file's Source parameter instead of vaguely referring to "various internet sources".--AlexandraIDV 22:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Random Japanese blogs. TarkusABtalk/contrib 22:52, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, that looks nice. Good work! It really shows what the page is about. It's a shame that one day it'll be replaced with just the series logo, but it's like that for all the other Nintendo franchises, so I guess it's only fair. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oof, I don't like the montage of the four covers. Too busy, too shrunk down. I would just use the first of the historical covers. (Or the modern image. I liked how the modern one was in English and how it elegantly covered both games. But I understand Wikipedia has a general preference for using the original artwork for media.) WanderingWanda (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- IDK, I've come around to feeling that the current four cover montage is the best we can do at this time. I understand it's busy, but no Disk System cover is more iconic or recognizable than the other, and Part II is arguably the more well known entry. The Switch cover, while nice for a number of reasons, is inferior to the Disk System art collage in that the latter reflects the art design of the original, its episodic nature, and their age. The look of the remake is quite different. Since most of the article is talking about the originals, it is not representative of the topic to use the remake artwork. TarkusABtalk/contrib 03:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Composer of Vol. 1
The composer is given as either a pseudonym or a mononym, and the actual, full name is not known. I asked on Manual of Style/Film for what to do in such a situation, and was told that the name, pseudonym/mononym or not, should be credited. Linkdude20002001 (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)