Talk:Southern Federal District: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:01, 17 January 2023

Russia: Human geography Start‑class High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

2022 Russian Invasion of the Ukraine

Have the provinces of the Ukraine "annexed" by the Russian Federation been added to this entity? 2601:18F:600:D40:5D3:BA5C:236B:436 (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2009-07-17 Federal subjects und Demographics

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Federal_District&diff=next&oldid=300766274 - I changed that unexplained hierarchy. 89.14.39.135 (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023-01-17 Vandalism, COPYVIO and deceptive edit summaries

User:Dmartin969 please stop it. 89.14.39.135 (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mooshberry please stop it.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Federal_District&diff=1134104972&oldid=1134104691 89.14.39.135 (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Philipnelson99 please stop it.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Federal_District&diff=1134105355&oldid=1134105229 89.14.39.135 (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southern_Federal_District&diff=1134107025&oldid=1134106337 78.55.14.88 (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, why are you removing the content? Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Figure I'll ping @Dmartin969 and @Mooshberry as well Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not specific to the subject, it also falls under WP:COPYVIO 78.55.14.88 (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain the copyright violation please? Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you're actively edit warring and changing IP addresses doesn't give you a pass for that. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Materialscientist because I think an admin might be useful here. I'm not sure how to handle this. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you and the others engaged in EW and in COPYVIO. So, just stop it, and no admin "might be useful here" 89.12.43.138 (talk) 01:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@89.12.43.138 how were we supposed to know if it was COPYVIO if you didn't explain that in the edit summary? Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the content removed for a starter? But if you didn't, why did you insert content of which you didn't know the source and if it was allowd to add it? And why did you change other stuff using the deceptive the edit summary "Reverted edits by 89.14.39.135 (talk): unexplained content removal (HG) (3.4.11)" 78.55.133.227 (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Attribution_is_required_for_copyright does that. 89.12.43.138 (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 #:::::Well, you and the others engaged in EW and in COPYVIO. So, just stop it, and no admin "might be useful here" [[Special:Contributions/89.12.43.138|89.12.43.138]] ([[User talk:89.12.43.138|talk]]) 01:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 #::::::[[User:89.12.43.138|@89.12.43.138]] how were we supposed to know if it was COPYVIO if you didn't explain that in the edit summary? [[User:Philipnelson99|Philipnelson99]] ([[User talk:Philipnelson99|talk]]) 01:49, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
-#:::::::Looking at the content removed for a starter? But if you didn't, why did you insert content of which you didn't know the source and if it was allowd to add it? And why did you change other stuff under but the edit summary deceptivly only said "Reverted edits by 89.14.39.135 (talk): unexplained content removal (HG) (3.4.11)" [[Special:Contributions/78.55.133.227|78.55.133.227]] ([[User talk:78.55.133.227|talk]]) 02:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
+#:::::::Looking at the content removed for a starter? But if you didn't, why did you insert content of which you didn't know the source and if it was allowd to add it? And why did you change other stuff using the deceptive the edit summary "Reverted edits by 89.14.39.135 (talk): unexplained content removal (HG) (3.4.11)" [[Special:Contributions/78.55.133.227|78.55.133.227]] ([[User talk:78.55.133.227|talk]]) 02:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 #::::[[Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Attribution_is_required_for_copyright]] does that. [[Special:Contributions/89.12.43.138|89.12.43.138]] ([[User talk:89.12.43.138|talk]]) 01:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)