User talk:ToNeverFindTheMets: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:01, 4 April 2024

Deadpool 3 Ireland Release

Hello there. I wanted to explain why Ireland is not included in the infobox and lead while the UK is (which I explained in my edit summaries, as well): Per WP:FILMRELEASE, the infobox is too small to fit all the countries in it (as many tend to have the same-day release), as it states: "the release date(s) in the country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings." Once it premieres, that will supersede this instance, and it was made in the UK (so we include that), not Ireland, which is not as notable per these points. Thank you for your time and contributions. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we then add United Kingdom as a co-Country of Origin? ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 20:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, and it should not have been added, hence why I just reverted it. This is an American production from American studios. The fact that it was filmed in the UK does not mean its country of origin is the UK. A lot of American films and shows shoot in the UK nowadays, especially at Pinewood Studios. And Kinberg being English doesn't mean this film is an English production either. This is WP:SYNTHESIS. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once the doubt surrounding TSG and Bona Fide comes to a stop, we will likely know more on technicalities such as these. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 21:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That, again, is an assumption. We don't even know if those companies will be credited, and even if they were, that wouldn't change this from an American/United States film to be a UK co-production film just because they helped finance it before production was almost done. That is not how this works. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the consensus was to hide those companies until technicalities are learned. We write stuff here as it is stated. That is how this works.

Besides, doubt will eventually be remedied surrounding these financers. They could be credited, they could not be credited. Has TSG been credited on these sorts of films before? Will it be "like iron man 3"? We will know in time. Assuming the world doesn't blow up in the time before now and then. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm 98Tigerius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dune: Part Two seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 14:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What? ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 14:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ToNeverFindTheMets, I'm the one who jotted down the first Dune: Part Two plot. I went to an advance screeing last night, "Fan First Premier", and I wrote down the plot right after. It's authentic. You can look up the showing. DuneEditor (talk) 18:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was it as good as the critics say? Lol, sorry for being a bit of a stickler. I loved the first one myself, and it's about time a sequel fulfils a creative's vision the right way. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, it’s absolutely amazing, 10/10! It’s exceeded my high expectations and it’s a huge expansion of the last film. Everything has been improved and the cinematography, the soundtrack, the story, everything is just *chef’s kiss* DuneEditor (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friday where I live simply cannot arrive fast enough! Glad to hear it is, well, in your words, "absolutely amazing"! Happy travels to you, good editor! ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 23:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello ToNeverFindTheMets! Your additions to BRZRKR: Poetry of Madness have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. I removed the copyvio and flagged the older revisions for deletion, so it's fixed now, but try to keep this in mind as you edit. Good work otherwise and thanks for contributing! Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Keanu Reeves into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 20:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Keanu Reeves in the media has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Alright. I'll add the same shit back but word it differently. Thanks for your construction to this page. "Thanks". ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA review of Dress (Taylor Swift song)

Hi there. Please note that when reviewing a good article nomination, you should follow the instructions. In this case, as raised at the GAN talk page, I don't see that an in-depth review was provided, or that you did a spotcheck of citations to ensure source-text integrity. You also did not close the review correctly, which happily allows you to easily go back and provide a more in-depth review. If you have any questions, please ping me. Best wishes, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right-o. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 12:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your frustration with the public post about your review at WT:GAN, but your comment was absolutely unacceptable. The rest of your behavior, including your sarcastic response to Diannaa above, and your incredibly uncivil commentary at User_talk:Chris_troutman#Vampire, isn't making you look any better. I have blocked you indefinitely. You are free to make an unblock request and it will be reviewed by another admin. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am deeply sorry. Don't know what got into me. I'm just looking for a set of more understanding folks who don't make jabs at noobs. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 02:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you have to deal with this. I said something insanely wrong to Diannaa here and I posted something on their talkpage to try and amend it. Chris irked me because he had every opportunity to be gracious about my own noobish stupidity, but chose to be comically blunt about it. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 02:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant warning

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly have no clue what this message is even referring to, but I think you've misunderstood my warning. Threatening physical harm against another person, even as a joke or in hyperbole, is absolutely unacceptable, and has gotten other editors sanctioned in the past. Do not ever make a comment like this again. Consider this your only warning; the next step if it happens again will have to be administrative intervention. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was too rude to some people. I'd like to plead for another chance.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ToNeverFindTheMets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason: I was a bit rude to some people. Diana, on my talk page, though I posted on theirs something nicer, but still not good enough for a proper apology. I got pretty shitty with someone over putting me on blast on a public talk page over a good article review for a Taylor Swift song, and frankly, I tried unsaying some stuff before I was blocked by chaos. Even if others could've handled themselves better, that was never my concern. I should've been more thorough in my own kindness, and personally should have handled myself better. I hope to clear most of my other stuff on here given the grace of an admin, and start more anew. I felt accosted by a "Bite the Newcomers" joke, and frankly, should've logged off to begin with myself. I'm deeply sorry for wasting your time over me being a gullible moron and unkind to others by wiki standards, kind Admin. I hate to pitch this like Ebeneezer Scrooge trying to repent after being shown the ghosts of Christmas's time, but I'd really love a shot at giving these people the proper apologies they deserve. ~ Human After All ~

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 {{clear}}
 ----
-'''Request reason''': I was a bit rude to some people. Diana, on my talk page, though I posted on theirs something nicer. I got pretty shitty with someone over putting me on blast on a public talk page over a good article review for a [[Taylor Swift]] song, and frankly, I tried unsaying some stuff before I was blocked by chaos. Even if others could've handled themselves better, that was never my concern. I should've been more thorough in my own kindness, and personally should have handled myself better. I hope to clear most of my other stuff on here given the grace of an admin, and start more anew. I felt accosted by a "Bite the Newcomers" joke, and frankly, should've logged off to begin with myself. I'm deeply sorry for wasting your time over me being a gullible moron and unkind to others by wiki standards, kind Admin. I hate to pitch this like Ebeneezer Scrooge trying to repent after being shown the ghosts of Christmas's time, but I'd really love a shot at giving these people the proper apologies they deserve. ~ [[Human After All]]  ~
+'''Request reason''': I was a bit rude to some people. Diana, on my talk page, though I posted on theirs something nicer, but still not good enough for a proper apology. I got pretty shitty with someone over putting me on blast on a public talk page over a good article review for a [[Taylor Swift]] song, and frankly, I tried unsaying some stuff before I was blocked by chaos. Even if others could've handled themselves better, that was never my concern. I should've been more thorough in my own kindness, and personally should have handled myself better. I hope to clear most of my other stuff on here given the grace of an admin, and start more anew. I felt accosted by a "Bite the Newcomers" joke, and frankly, should've logged off to begin with myself. I'm deeply sorry for wasting your time over me being a gullible moron and unkind to others by wiki standards, kind Admin. I hate to pitch this like Ebeneezer Scrooge trying to repent after being shown the ghosts of Christmas's time, but I'd really love a shot at giving these people the proper apologies they deserve. ~ [[Human After All]]  ~
 <div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;"><!-- PARSER FUNCTIONS START HERE