Talk:Frogs into Princes: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Useful versus True: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Please note that talk pages are for discussions intended towards improving the article, not a [[WP:NOTFORUM|general discussion forum]]. It's not clear that the reason that you posted this here falls into the former category. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
:Please note that talk pages are for discussions intended towards improving the article, not a [[WP:NOTFORUM|general discussion forum]]. It's not clear that the reason that you posted this here falls into the former category. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks Skyerise. That chapter discusses this book, Frogs into Princes which is widely discussed in the literature across many disciplines. I have not had a chance to summarise it yet for this article. Currently looking for third party sources that discuss to expand the reception and criticism section. By the way, are you ok with using sfn on this article moving forward for the citation format given that it just new? --[[User:Notgain|Notgain]] ([[User talk:Notgain|talk]]) 13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
::Thanks Skyerise. That chapter discusses this book, Frogs into Princes which is widely discussed in the literature across many disciplines. I have not had a chance to summarise it yet for this article. Currently looking for third party sources that discuss to expand the reception and criticism section. By the way, are you ok with using sfn on this article moving forward for the citation format given that it just new? --[[User:Notgain|Notgain]] ([[User talk:Notgain|talk]]) 13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::No. You started with ref, and ref it stays. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 13:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:05, 9 May 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Useful versus True
See discussion in: Tosey, Paul; Mathison, Jane (2009). "'Useful versus True' — Theory, Knowledge and Pseudoscience". Neuro-Linguistic Programming. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230248311_10. ISBN 978-1-349-35428-3. --Notgain (talk) 03:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please note that talk pages are for discussions intended towards improving the article, not a general discussion forum. It's not clear that the reason that you posted this here falls into the former category. Skyerise (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Skyerise. That chapter discusses this book, Frogs into Princes which is widely discussed in the literature across many disciplines. I have not had a chance to summarise it yet for this article. Currently looking for third party sources that discuss to expand the reception and criticism section. By the way, are you ok with using sfn on this article moving forward for the citation format given that it just new? --Notgain (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. You started with ref, and ref it stays. Skyerise (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Skyerise. That chapter discusses this book, Frogs into Princes which is widely discussed in the literature across many disciplines. I have not had a chance to summarise it yet for this article. Currently looking for third party sources that discuss to expand the reception and criticism section. By the way, are you ok with using sfn on this article moving forward for the citation format given that it just new? --Notgain (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class Alternative Views articles
- Low-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles