Jump to content

Talk:Frogs into Princes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Short Description Options: new section - suggestions in order of preference
Line 15: Line 15:
::::Unless the consensus shifts. --[[User:Notgain|Notgain]] ([[User talk:Notgain|talk]]) 13:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Unless the consensus shifts. --[[User:Notgain|Notgain]] ([[User talk:Notgain|talk]]) 13:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Not bloody likely. Please review [[WP:MEAT]] - you cannot recruit off-Wikipedia friends for support. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Not bloody likely. Please review [[WP:MEAT]] - you cannot recruit off-Wikipedia friends for support. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

== Short Description Options ==

Here's my suggestions in order of preference for the short description:
#"1979 Book by Bandler and Grinder" (30 characters)
#Early Neuro-Linguistic Programming Book (39 characters)
#1979 book (9 characters)
#Early and Influential NLP book (30 characters)
--[[User:Notgain|Notgain]] ([[User talk:Notgain|talk]]) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:27, 9 May 2024

Useful versus True

See discussion in: Tosey, Paul; Mathison, Jane (2009). "'Useful versus True' — Theory, Knowledge and Pseudoscience". Neuro-Linguistic Programming. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230248311_10. ISBN 978-1-349-35428-3. --Notgain (talk) 03:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that talk pages are for discussions intended towards improving the article, not a general discussion forum. It's not clear that the reason that you posted this here falls into the former category. Skyerise (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Skyerise. That chapter discusses this book, Frogs into Princes which is widely discussed in the literature across many disciplines. I have not had a chance to summarise it yet for this article. Currently looking for third party sources that discuss to expand the reception and criticism section. By the way, are you ok with using sfn on this article moving forward for the citation format given that it just new? --Notgain (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. You started with ref, and ref it stays. Skyerise (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the consensus shifts. --Notgain (talk) 13:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not bloody likely. Please review WP:MEAT - you cannot recruit off-Wikipedia friends for support. Skyerise (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short Description Options

Here's my suggestions in order of preference for the short description:

  1. "1979 Book by Bandler and Grinder" (30 characters)
  2. Early Neuro-Linguistic Programming Book (39 characters)
  3. 1979 book (9 characters)
  4. Early and Influential NLP book (30 characters)

--Notgain (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]